Visit Your Local PBS Station PBS Home PBS Home Programs A-Z TV Schedules Watch Video Support PBS Shop PBS Search PBS

The Wolf That Changed America
Wolf Wars: America's Campaign to Eradicate the Wolf

Wolves have been feared, hated, and persecuted for hundreds of years in North America. Before the arrival of Europeans, Native Americans incorporated wolves into their legends and rituals, portraying them as ferocious warriors in some traditions and thieving spirits in others. European Americans, however, simply despised wolves. Many, including celebrated painter and naturalist John James Audubon, believed wolves ought to be eradicated for the threat they posed to valuable livestock. This attitude enabled a centuries-long extermination campaign that nearly wiped out the gray wolf in the continental United States by 1950.

 

Origins of Wolf Hatred

In the New World, two top predators – wolves and men – that otherwise would have avoided each other clashed over livestock. In Vicious: Wolves and Men in America, Jon T. Coleman writes:

Wolves had a ghostly presence in colonial landscapes. Settlers heard howls, but they rarely spotted their serenaders. The fearsome beasts avoided humans. People frightened them, and colonists knew this: “They are fearefull Curres,” reported Thomas Morton in 1637, “and will runne away from a man (that meeteth them by chance at a banke end) as fast as any fearefull dogge.”

Because humans and wolves frightened one another, they logically avoided confrontation, opening space between the species. But that space closed when European colonists brought horses, cattle, sheep and pigs with them over the perilous journey across the Atlantic. Without these animals – sources of food and transportation for the European settlers – the colonies would have failed. But because most early colonial communities were small, livestock often grazed on the periphery of the settlements with little protection. Their pastures abutted and bled into the wild, exposing the animals to hungry wolves in search of prey. Wolves quickly learned that docile cattle and sheep made easy meals. Suddenly, colonists found their livelihoods in danger, and they lashed out at wolves, both with physical violence and folklore that ensured wolf hatred would be passed down from one generation to the next.

 

Amateur and Professional Wolf Baiting

The campaign to eradicate wolves in North America began with private landowners and farmers baiting and trapping wolves. Often, colonists turned wolf baiting into both sport and protection for their livestock. Jon T. Coleman describes an incident that took place in the winter of 1814 deep in the Ohio River Valley, in which John James Audubon assists a farmer as he mutilates trapped wolves.

During the fall, a pack of wolves had robbed [the farmer] of “nearly the whole of his sheep and one of his colts.” For him, it made sense to devote his winter labor to digging pits, weaving platforms, hunting bait, and setting and checking his traps twice daily. The animals had injured him, and “he was now ‘paying them off in full.’” Audubon’s reaction to the slaying of the wolves is less understandable … The ingenious pit traps amazed him, as did the fearsome predators’ meek behavior and the childlike glee the farmer took in his work. The violence Audubon witnessed, however, did not shock him. Watching a pack of dogs rip apart terrified and defenseless animals was a “sport” both he and the farmer found enjoyable.

Further west, in Yellowstone National Park, wolf baiting and hunting had become a lucrative profession. Paul Schullery, in his guidebook to Yellowstone wolves (The Yellowstone Wolf: A Guide & Sourcebook), describes the profession and the devastating affect it had on the Yellowstone wolf population: “At least as early as 1877, ungulate carcasses in the park were poisoned with strychnine by free-lance ‘wolfers’ for ‘wolf or wolverine bait.’ By 1880, [Yellowstone National Park] Superintendent [Philetus] Norris stated in his annual report that ‘…the value of their [wolves and coyotes] hides and their easy slaughter with strychnine-poisoned carcasses have nearly led to their extermination.’”

In the Southwest, as settlers depleted bison, elk, deer, and moose populations – the wolves’ natural prey – the predators turned more and more to picking off livestock. In states like New Mexico where cattle ranching was big business, ranchers responded by turning to professional wolfers and bounty hunters. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reports, “To protect livestock, ranchers and government agencies began an eradication campaign. Bounty programs initiated in the 19th century continued as late as 1965, offering $20 to $50 per wolf. Wolves were trapped, shot, dug from their dens, and hunted with dogs. Poisoned animal carcasses were left out for wolves, a practice that also killed eagles, ravens, foxes, bears, and other animals that fed on the tainted carrion.”

 

Government-Sanctioned Wolf Extermination Programs   

  

Government wolf trapper

Towards the end of the 19th Century, wealthy livestock owners increased both their demand for wider grazing ranges and their influence over policymakers in Washington, D.C. In 1885, the federal government established the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey, initially chartered to research insects and birds. However, the livestock lobby quickly diverted the Bureau’s attention to wolves. Stockowners complained that their land was infested with wolves, calling them “breeding grounds.” They demanded the federal government secure their land for safe pasturage.

In 1906, the U.S. Forest Service acquiesced to the stockowners and enlisted the help of the Bureau of Biological Survey to clear cattle ranges of gray wolves. In other words, the Bureau became a wolf-extermination unit. Bruce Hampton writes in The Great American Wolf:

That same year [1906], bureau biologist Vernon Bailey traveled to Wyoming and New Mexico to investigate the extent of wolf and coyote depredations. Upon Bailey’s return to Washington, D.C., President Roosevelt invited him to the White House to see what he had learned. Although there is no record of their conversation, immediately following Bailey’s meeting the President, the Biological Survey recommended that the government begin “devising methods for the destruction of the animals [wolves].”

By the middle of the 20th Century, government-sponsored extermination had wiped out nearly all gray wolves in the Lower 48 states. Only a small population remained in northeastern Minnesota and Michigan. Yet the Bureau of Biological Survey was still disseminating anti-wolf propaganda as late as 1940. One poster from the time read:

According to estimates of stockmen [the Custer Wolf, pictured in the poster] killed $25,000 worth of cattle during the seven years he was known in the vicinity of Custer, South Dakota … A local bounty of $500 failed to secure his capture. A Department hunter ended his career of destruction by a skillfully set trap. Many notorious wolves are known to have killed cattle valued at $3000 to $5000 in a year. More than 3,849 wolves have been destroyed by the predatory animal work of the Department and its cooperators since the work was organized in 1915.

It was not until the late sixties, when a greater understanding of natural ecosystems began changing attitudes in the scientific community and the National Park Service, that the plight of wolves in North America began to improve.

In 1973, Congress gave gray wolves protection under the Endangered Species Act. According to Douglas Smith and Gary Ferguson, in Yellowstone National Park, where the last gray wolf was killed in 1926, “the entire [gray wolf] restoration program was guided by directives contained in the Endangered Species Act – a law created to ground a decades-old cornerstone of science that says the healthiest, most stable natural systems tend to be those with high levels of biodiversity.”

Since then, wolf populations throughout the country have increased. In 1995 and 1996, researchers in Yellowstone National Park released 31 Canadian gray wolves back into the wild. The event was hailed as a testament to the conservation movement’s efforts to revive wild wolf populations in America. Yet antiwolf attitudes persist. Shortly after the release of the Yellowstone wolves a hunter shot and killed Wolf Number 10. Smith and Ferguson write about the incident: “As disturbing as the shooting itself was, more unsavory still was the reaction of a handful of locals who cheered the killing, calling it an act of heroism.”

Photos © Arizona Historical Society

 

Sources

Coleman, Jon T. Vicious: Wolves and Men in America. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 2004.

Hampton, Bruce. The Great American Wolf. New York: Henry Holt and Company, Inc., 1997.

Robinson, Michael J. Predatory Bureaucracy: The Extermination of Wolves and the Transformation of the West. University Press of Colorado, 2005.

Schullery, Paul. The Yellowstone Wolf: A Guide & Sourcebook. Worland, Wymoning: High Plains Publishing Company, Inc., 1996.

Smith, Douglas W. and Gary Ferguson. Decade of the Wolf: Returning the Wild to Yellowstone. Guilford, Connecticut: The Lyons Press, 2005.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Gray Wolf Fact Sheet. [updated January 2007; cited November 2008]

   Print    Email    comments (19)

(7 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...
19 responses
virginia sabourin -- November 17th, 2008 at 2:39 pm

an excellent article on mankinds threat to the wolf and nature itself. I think we should respect the wolf and help them as much as possible to expand their territory and pack growth…but the cattlemen have more money and power…..it is very, very sad how we are killing off many species of wildlife with our pollution and greed for land and money…there is no profit in helping the wolf….very sad indeed…

steven -- November 18th, 2008 at 7:36 pm

The wolf is a noble beast that must be protected.

http://80.249.98.16/mhill/barney/images/teen-wolf.jpg

Floyd Bond -- November 22nd, 2008 at 1:12 pm

The wolf is part of our ecosystem. We simply cannot wipe out the wolf without having seriuos affects on our own lives.We should be very thankful we have national parks like Yellowstone and people such as Doug Smith and others who work everyday very hard for the conservation of our wolves.It is very sad that there are still people that believe the wolves should be wiped out.

Anne -- November 23rd, 2008 at 6:56 pm

Destruction of the earth, partly by eradicating a creature, the wolf, that has always been a vital part of the ecosystem, is extremely ignorant and borders on insanity. Take a long, hard look at what all the invaders to Indian land have done. The Indians always respected and loved the Earth and all its inhabitants, and had a deep understanding of the role all beings, plant or animal, played in the balance. When there’s nothing else to destroy, that makes them feel so empowered, what will they do? Destroy each other, I presume. Humans that remain ignorant need to become aware of the fact that some things are irreplaceable and all the money in the world won’t matter. This will inevitably affect humans, as all the other destruction of the Earth has. There are other ways to protect livestock, besides gunning down innocent wolves, who are living by instinct, that is necessary to their survival.

val -- November 24th, 2008 at 12:28 am

The show on Nature was touching and informative. I have enjoyed peoples comments too. Please tell anyone you know about the wolfs place in the environment.

Cheryl Crone -- November 24th, 2008 at 7:46 am

The assault against wolves comes from many different facets. This is a nation of laws. It seems to me nobody wins unless the law is on your side—including the majestic wolf. We need federal laws to override Alaska, Idaho, Minnesota that continues to have bounties on wolves. We also lack concerned and knowledgeable political leadership. One issue that puzzles me is the sport hunter, and the rancher, Ernest T. Seton was able to resolve the issue of killing wildlife .I pray others will too. Put away their pride and have an image and reputation to be proud of.
We need the scientific data that Doug Smith and people like him collect to prove the positive impact wolves have on our ecosystem.
Now with Thanksgiving Day very near I am thankful for the awakening that the wolf is a treasure,and needs and deserves respect and protection. Thank-you PBS for being part of the enlightenment.

Refugio Gonzalez -- November 29th, 2008 at 3:01 am

THE CREATOR CREATED ALL THAT EXISTS ON THE EARTH.
THE QUESTION THAT WE ALL ASK IS, WHY TERMINATE ALL
WHAT NOT BELONGS TO US.
WE SHOULD ALL CHERISH WHAT WAS PUT ON THIS EARTH.
ONLY TAKE AND EAT WHAT IS NEEDED,FOR THE QUESTION IS
WILL WE STILL EXIST.
ONLY THE CREATOR KNOWS.
ARE YOU OR I THE CREATOR???

Heather -- November 30th, 2008 at 4:37 am

The issues surrounding wolves is a tough one for me and I put my thoughts out there in hopes someone can relate. I am a land manager for the government. I work with ranchers all the time. Their first argument is usually that the wolves don’t belong because they are not native to a given area and their supplemental argument is the mannner in which the wolves prey on their livestock. They say they are doing the humane thing for all prey of wolves by killing them. The bottom line is though that the wolves hurt ranchers financially. From a land management point of view, what may financially hurt a rancher is not necessarily the governments problem. But then there is this belief that livestock benefit the land and that rest can hurt the land so therefor land managers are asked to build relationships with the rancher. I personally do not believe in predator control for ecological reasons but to ranchers it economically necessary. What most people do not understand is that government agencies like USFS and BLM were created to regulate, not eliminate, grazing of livestock. It has always been biased towards livestock producers. So the question is, why aren’t people looking at changing the goals of government land management?

samantha -- December 11th, 2008 at 7:48 pm

i think we should be kind to the wolves

Ben wood -- January 20th, 2009 at 2:06 pm

I think wolves shouldn’t be In Idaho they are killing all the farmers livstock and costing them lots of money

Randy -- March 30th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

Most of you must be from the city and went to a art store seen a picture of the majestic wolf bought it and think its wonderful, well when it gets to the point that our kids can’t play in the back yard without a parent watching over them with a high power rifle because wolf packs are in the area were we live tell you what you deal with the drug dealers and rapist best you know how and we will deal with the wolfs best we know how.

Hidden -- April 15th, 2009 at 11:58 pm

People who kill wolves are lupifobic the people who hate wolves that posted here are stupid and should hide under rocks and die. 10 years I’ve been around wolves and they don’t harm anyone unless you prevoke them
the Ranchers and such want people to hate them because they are greedy!
My family has ranched some generations and we only had problems with coyotes
as to Randy I have the impression you are from the city because wolves that attack children from backyards have serious problems
A mountain lion or bear possibly but a wolf?
NO! ya know what? No! Just no!
Bad case of Lupiphobia there!
as to Refugio Gonzalez thank you your post is one of the most sensible! It speeks volumes

Elizabeth -- May 13th, 2009 at 10:10 am

I’m sorry, but I don’t know if I feel comfortable letting people like you “deal with the wolfs best [you] know how” if you can’t even write a simple comment intelligently. It is people like you that aid in the misunderstanding of such beautiful creatures.

Brad Fowler -- May 13th, 2009 at 7:18 pm

I am a sportsman who lives in Idaho and I have to admit that I felt the reintroduction of the wolf was unnessisary. I signed every anti-wolf paper that was placed in front of me, and I believed every thing that was told to me by my “friends” concerning how the wolves need to go away. It wasnt until I started to look into the issues myself that I started to have an understanding as to why they were being brought back. I can tell you all about why, but that will not do any good as it would only create more ignorance. Study it for yourselves. But do not look to the standard sources (ie defenders of wildlife, or Outdoor Life magazine) because they may have some of the facts, but they let emotion in with the facts to influence the opinions of the readers. The unbias data that comes from the biologists is the only place to find all of the facts. Doug Smith in Yellowstone National Park is a good place to start.
Once you have an understanding of these animals then you can share your knowledge. Have your opinions, but base those opinions on the facts.
Dont call me pro wolf, but I am pro wolf hunting. And it is not because I hate them, It is because I have sought out the facts, and I do respect them as an important roll player in the ecosystem.

Greg wolf -- July 8th, 2009 at 7:19 pm

heh, that’s awkward if your last name is wolf at that time

An Easy Four Bucks -- September 2nd, 2009 at 2:26 pm

[...] Idaho’s state government a few bucks. The program obviously has some folks in a lather, as history shows that rapacious hunting was responsible for the gray wolf’s longtime residency on the [...]

dean morgan -- October 21st, 2009 at 10:48 am

hi im from wales in the uk, ive had a special affinity for these beautifull animals for all y life! never seen one live but plan to visit canada next year! we really must ensure this animal survives, everything we kill and persecute will be to our detrement! the wolf is our brother as is mother earth and father sky! and brad as i respect your opinion i believe its man who has to go away! the indians lived with the wolves and survived that was until the introduction of european man the great white hunter! mans reign on this earth is allmost over cherish what we have before its too late!

wolf -- October 28th, 2009 at 8:56 am

just kill em all

Hay jo -- November 21st, 2009 at 11:01 pm

Gray wolves are not wanted by most hunters they only kill for sport and need to lower their numbers unlike the native timberwolf in montana who got wiped out they only kill for fun not for food so i say get ridd of them

post a comment
Please note that the THIRTEEN editorial staff reserves the right to not post comments it deems to be inappropriate and/or malicious in nature, as well as edit comments for length, clarity and fairness. No solicitations or advertisements will be allowed. Users may link to other Web sites relevant to discussion, but most often links to commercial Web sites will not be permitted.

Produced by THIRTEEN    ©2009 Educational Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved.

Major corporate support for Nature is provided by SC Johnson, Canon, CPB.