 |
Blood Basics > The Blood Supply
Bad Blood
The following is excerpted from BLOOD: A HISTORY OF MEDICINE AND COMMERCE (ISBN 0-688-17649-6) by Douglas Starr (pgs. 207-212).
Chapter 12: Bad Blood
The blood business boomed in the 1960s and '70s. The enterprise had become so
decentralized by now that no one knew how much was collected, although most
estimates put it well above six million pints a year in the U.S. alone, easily
surpassing peak collections during the war. The liquid's uses multiplied as
well, as Cohn's dream of component therapy approached realization. Rather than
using whole-blood transfusions, doctors increasingly administered individual
components such as red cells, white cells, platelets, and plasma. Plasma itself
was giving way to an increasing number of fractionation products, including
albumin, gamma globulins, blood-typing sera, and clotting factors for people
with hemophilia. Doctors used more blood in more ways than ever before.
At this point the blood business divided. Hospitals and blood banks continued
collecting whole blood, but plasma became an industrial affair. A new process
called plasmapheresis propelled the separation. The system involved removing
blood from the donor, centrifuging it to separate the plasma, and then
re-infusing the red cells. The procedure was uncomfortable and could take a
couple of hours (at least until it was automated in the mid-1980s), which made
it necessary to pay the donors.
Plasmapheresis proved invaluable to the drug industry, allowing manufacturers
to harvest greater volumes of the raw plasma they desired. The process was safer
than harvesting whole blood, since removing only plasma did not lead to anemia.
Furthermore, while it takes weeks for the body to regenerate red cells, plasma
can be replenished in a couple of days. All this meant that drug firms could
collect more often than before: Previously they had had to wait a couple of
months between purchases of blood from a given donor; now they could buy from
him twice a week--104 times a year instead of 6.
What happened next can best be envisioned by imagining that someone invented
a very fast and cheap way of drilling for oil at the same time that the industry
discovered petrochemicals. Almost overnight, the collection business boomed.
Hundreds of new plasma centers sprang up to meet the demands of the burgeoning
"biologics" industry, as it came to be called. Some belonged to the drug firms
that had pioneered fractionation under Cohn; others belonged to small
independents, specializing in collecting and selling the raw material. Like
drilling rigs at an oil field, they sprouted wherever the resource seemed
promising--around army bases and college campuses, in downtrodden neighborhoods,
and along the Mexican-American border. From there the "source plasma" was sent
to the nation's biologics manufacturers, who, in order to process it
economically, pooled it in vats containing thousands of pints.
New classes of people became involved--shadier buyers, more desperate
sellers. Experts had warned about the potential for abuse. During a 1966
conference at Cohn's Protein Foundation, Dr. Tibor Greenwalt, a leader in
nonprofit blood banking, cautioned against "exploiting for its proteins a
population which is least able to donate them"--yet that gave little pause to
commercial entrepreneurs. Tom Asher, a fifty-year veteran of the plasma industry
who worked as a manager for the Hyland division of Baxter Laboratories, ruefully
recalled that his company set up its first center at Fourth and Town streets in
Los Angeles--"absolute dead center, Skid Row. We'd immunize donors with tetanus
to increase their antibodies for tetanus gamma globulin. When hurried, our
doctor, who was also the bouncer, would occasionally give them shots of tetanus
antigen right through their trousers." Later the company took to "bankrolling
all sorts of characters" to meet the booming demand for source plasma, many with
questionable ethics. Another Los Angeles center, called Doctors Blood Bank and
run by two local pathologists, paid donors in chits redeemable at a local liquor
store.
Stuart Bauer, a writer for New York magazine, investigated the world
of down-and-out plasma sellers by becoming one himself. After a loved one died
of transfusion-related hepatitis, Bauer went undercover, donning old clothes and
selling his plasma thirteen times over a period of seven weeks. His tale was a
bleak one of hardened collectors and avaricious doctors, and of the winos,
addicts, malnourished, and destitute whose plasma they "farmed" at the center in
Times Square. Among the chilling scenes in his article is one about the
experience of donation:
The pain of insertion comes in three overlapping waves. The first two waves--the
puncturing of the skin and the piercing of the radial vein--are dicey enough,
but stubbing a toe or biting the tongue are really worse. It is the third wave,
the least painful part, that carries the freight. For when the body of the
catheter is fitted inside the vein, distending it, it catches you--of all
places--in the heart, which registers the intrusion with a chilly ping.
When the next beat comes the heart's resumption has a choked rhythm . . . and
you resolve from here on in to cater to your heart. But the only favor it occurs
to you you can do is not to breathe too deeply. So you take in air in miserly
little sniffs. And root for your heart as you would for a long-distance runner
who had stumbled. ...
"Ever wonder what it's like?" [he asks the nurse].
"... Wonder what what's like?"
"Being on the other end of a hollow needle the size of a swizzle stick? ... It's like being impaled on the antenna of a car radio, that's what it's like."
Later he describes a scene in which the doctor at the center finds an elderly
donor lying quite still with his mouth and eyes open. "How are we today,
Sydney?" he asks the old man. But Sydney is dead. After the body is removed, the
doctor remarks that during his years of association with the center the man had
donated almost half a million cubic centimeters of blood. " 'One always hates to
lose a veteran donor with a gamma globulin like his. ...'"
Not all those who sold their plasma were exploited. Some donors, with rare
blood types or immunity factors, could sell their plasma at a premium. This was
especially true of women who had developed a sensitivity to the Rh factor, the
condition in which a baby with Rh-positive blood triggers an immune reaction in
its Rh-negative mother. Two disciples of Karl Landsteiner, Drs. Philip Levine
and Alexander Weiner, had shown that an Rh-negative woman could be immunized
against the disease by injecting her with Rh antibodies immediately after the
birth of her first Rh-positive child, and by the late 1960s this injection
became commercially available. The source of this rare antibody--called "Big D"
in blood-banking circles--was other Rh-negative mothers who had given birth to
an Rh-positive child. The women most prized for plasma donation were
"high-titre" mothers whose antibody concentrations were unusually high. A woman
with such a rare combination of biology and circumstance could become wealthy
from selling her plasma several times a month. One such woman, Dorothy Garber of
Miami, Florida, had such a high concentration of the Big D antibody that she was
able to earn more than $80,000 a year.
For every Dorothy Garber, however, there were thousands of less fortunate
sellers--the unemployed, indigent, and substance-addicted--who would line up
outside the centers in ragged neighborhoods to sell their plasma for $10 a pint.
A "high percentage of our donors are either illiterate or functionally
illiterate," the director of a South Carolina plasma center run by Cutter
Laboratories wrote in an undated memo. "They have great difficulties reading
words with more than two syllables and even more trouble understanding the
meaning [of] those words. I am fairly sure most of the other Plasmacenters have
the same problems."
The most disenfranchised group of donors was prisoners, who became an
important source of plasma-derived products, mainly gamma globulin. Gamma
globulins can be fractionated from anybody's plasma, but the best way to gather
them is to find someone who has been exposed to a disease and has produced a
high concentration of the antibodies in question. One way to collect gamma
globulins would be to comb the population for survivors of diseases such as
rabies or tetanus. A far more practical method is to inject a donor with a light
dose of the pathogen and wait a few days for his immune system to gear up. This
"hyperimmune" plasma can be fractionated to produce a highly concentrated and
specific gamma globulin.
Prisoners proved ideal for this procedure. They were desperate enough to need
the money (or furlough time, the reward in some prisons) but not likely to
disappear, as were the transients from Skid Row. Soon prisons became an
important source of gamma globulins for pharmaceutical firms such as Cutter and
Hyland and the subcontractors who served them. Unfortunately, they operated in a
regulatory vacuum. Under so-called short-supply provisions governing vital
resources, drug companies could buy certain materials from unlicensed,
uninspected vendors. Plasma was one such vital material. So, although federal
health and safety rules covered the drug companies that processed the
plasma, they exempted the smaller firms that merely collected it. A
dangerous situation developed in which drug companies maintained reasonably safe
and hygienic prison centers but the subcontractors who supplied them often did
not.
The most notorious of these cases involved a chain of prison facilities owned
by an Oklahoma physician named Austin R. Stough. Stough was a prison doctor for
the Oklahoma State Penitentiary when he became aware of the emerging market for
plasma. He opened a plasma center in the penitentiary, then expanded to
institutions in Arkansas and Alabama. There he injected volunteer prisoners with
the antigens for several diseases, collected their hyperimmune plasma, and sold
it as raw material to the major biologics firms. By the mid-1960s, Stough had
set up centers in five prisons in the South and was supplying the raw material
for a quarter of the nation's hyperimmune gamma globulin.
Soon the prison donors started getting sick. One man nearly died when a
technician reinfused him with someone else's red cells; another expired after a
series of injections designed to boost his antibodies to whooping cough.
Hepatitis rates jumped at several of the prisons. Five months after Stough's
center opened in Kilby Prison in Alabama, the hepatitis rate among inmates
soared from zero or one case a month to fifteen, then entered a sustained rate
of twenty to thirty cases a month, including four deaths. Then forty-two men
became sick at two other prisons in Alabama. "They're dropping like flies out
here," said a penciled note from an inmate at Kilby. By the time the epidemic
had run its course, the National Communicable Disease Center in Atlanta (the
forerunner to the Centers for Disease Control) reported that 544 cases could
firmly be linked to Stough's operation and that the real number probably
approached a thousand. They could not make an exact estimate, because many
health records had been lost or destroyed.
There was no doubt as to the cause of the infections. Stough ran a sloppy
operation, with poorly trained technicians and unsanitary equipment. Even his
customers knew it--an inspector for Cutter Laboratories reported that he was
"appalled" by the conditions. Yet, right until the time that Stough was forced
to abandon his plasma business, the major drug firms remained a loyal clientele.
To them it was a question of supply. Having cultivated corrections officials
with generous retainers, Stough had gained unparalleled access to the resource.
Besides, reasoned the companies and federal officials, gamma globulins did not
transmit hepatitis--as far as they could tell, the products derived from prison
plasma were safe. Coldly and legally speaking, what happened to the prisoners
was not really their concern.
Such indifference could not last for long. Dark stories were emerging about commercial blood and plasma in America, about a system that was poorly regulated and out of control. It also became evident that American blood products were not entirely safe. They had become tainted by a virus that, spread through transfusions and contaminated plasma, was killing hundreds, perhaps thousands, per year.
Reprinted by permission of the author from BLOOD: A HISTORY OF MEDICINE AND COMMERCE by Douglas Starr. Copyright © 1998 by Douglas Starr. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
|
 |