 |
Blood Basics > Blood in War
Post-War Blood Systems
Blood proved one of the key resources of World War II. It
was only logical, then, that as nations rebuilt themselves
after the conflict, establishing blood systems became a
priority. In doing so, each nation embarked on its own
course, influenced by its particular experience and
philosophy.
United States
The United States, which showed that blood could be
managed on an industrial scale, continued to employ it
asa medical commodity. Throughout the nation blood banks and the Red Cross
collected blood from volunteers. Yet even they could not meet the growing demand.
Soon a new breed of blood collector took up the slack -- the freewheeling, for-profit
collection center that paid people for their blood.
Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical industry began to manage the plasma supply. Using
paid plasma donors, the industry collected, processed, and distributed plasma products
throughout America and much of the world. The combination of non-profit and for-profit
blood and plasma collectors, hospitals, universities, government labs and research
institutes made America the powerhouse of the blood world.
United Kingdom
The politics of transfusion were simple for the British:
Having nationalized their health system after the war,
they considered blood a resource for the people, and
placed it in the hands of the government. Blood and its
derivatives were managed by to the newly established
National Blood Service, part of the Ministry of Health. The
nation maintained 14 regional Transfusion Centres. Each
Centre collected, preserved, and distributed blood to
blood banks and hospitals in its region. The system
seemed so effective and fair that it shone for many years as an international example.
France
For sheer idealism no country approached France, where blood donation had become
associated with the Resistance. In the years following the war the nation established an
annual Day of Blood, in which whole communities would come out to give. Later they
developed a national blood policy, the keystone of which was a concept called
"benevolat" -- meaning blood should be voluntarily given, with no payment to donors or
commercialism of any kind. Under this concept blood was not merely a resource, but
part of a nationwide social contract. Even prisoners were encouraged to give, as
participating was seen as a humanizing influence. The French saw their system as a
model of efficiency and idealism, part of an enduring social bond in which all French
people could feel uplifted and proud.
The Soviet Union
In the Soviet Union, as in many Communist nations, transfusion became a state
enterprise. Blood was collected in factories or in the military and paid for with money,
food rations, or vacation days. Despite the rewards, people saw the system as
coercive: "You will give blood" became an invitation that the citizens could not refuse.
People saw blood as so coupled to repressive regimes that when Communism fell,
blood systems throughout Eastern Europe temporarily collapsed.
Germany and Japan
Blood banks were established haphazardly in the wreckage of post-war Germany.
Doctors throughout West Germany would grab any materials available and establish
little facilities wherever they could put them. (Sometime they'd collect the Coke bottles
discarded by American GIs, sterilize them, and use them to store blood.) The staff at
many of these makeshift blood banks paid for donations with money and food.
Meanwhile, the German Red Cross tried to establish a nationwide voluntary system.
With commercial collectors in most of the cities, the Red Cross focused on the rural
parts of Germany. This was the most volatile period of the Cold War, so they built
processing centers well away from major cities in case of an atomic attack. Red Cross
vans would travel through the countryside, collecting blood from volunteers at factories
and small towns. Thus, a dual system evolved: paid clinical centers in the cities and the
voluntary Red Cross stations in rural areas.
In war-ravaged Japan, an improvised blood system developed that had more in
common with the black market than with a system devoted to health. Hospitals
obtained blood through independent blood brokers who, for a commission, would
supply them with donors. Aside from a cursory examination for blood type, many
hospitals did not test for disease. Blood-borne syphilis caused several scandals until the
country began to modernize its blood system in the late 1940s.
-- Douglas Starr
|
 |