http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-29-2009/religion-and-the-courts/3114/ An online companion to the weekly television news program Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:24:04 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-29-2009/religion-and-the-courts/3114/comment-page-1/#comment-1649 daniwitz13 Sat, 30 May 2009 07:22:49 +0000 http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3114#comment-1649 Let me get this straight. A Homosexual is a person sexually attracted to members of one’s own sex, and are about 3% of our Nation, and totally different from the 97% of our Nation. They are attracted to the same gender, prefers the same gender and oriented to the same gender. But why is gender the only stand-out preference? Why not a preference for a certain race, a certain religion, a blonde, a Democrat, or any other preference? Why only gender? Does just having a sexual attraction for someone, no matter how different from the norm, allow our courts, legislatures, and our movie stars, to gain the same status with the greatest institution on Planet Earth, Marriage. This is not just another club or company. This is what civilization is all about. Of the 7 trillion people on the planet, everyone of them (barring engineered) came from the mating of a Man and Woman. Not one of them came from a same sex mating. Every Homosexual came from a Mother and a Father. Marriage predates our constitution, and is so biological and evolutionally correct, that one wonders how something aberrant, so insignificant, just a matter of preference, have equal footing with the greatest Institution on Earth. The Institution of a Man and Woman. It stands alone as the source of our civilization. Let me get this straight. A Homosexual is a person sexually attracted to members of one’s own sex, and are about 3% of our Nation, and totally different from the 97% of our Nation. They are attracted to the same gender, prefers the same gender and oriented to the same gender. But why is gender the only stand-out preference? Why not a preference for a certain race, a certain religion, a blonde, a Democrat, or any other preference? Why only gender? Does just having a sexual attraction for someone, no matter how different from the norm, allow our courts, legislatures, and our movie stars, to gain the same status with the greatest institution on Planet Earth, Marriage. This is not just another club or company. This is what civilization is all about. Of the 7 trillion people on the planet, everyone of them (barring engineered) came from the mating of a Man and Woman. Not one of them came from a same sex mating. Every Homosexual came from a Mother and a Father. Marriage predates our constitution, and is so biological and evolutionally correct, that one wonders how something aberrant, so insignificant, just a matter of preference, have equal footing with the greatest Institution on Earth. The Institution of a Man and Woman. It stands alone as the source of our civilization.

]]>