By — Geoff Mulvihill, Associated Press Geoff Mulvihill, Associated Press Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/what-to-know-about-the-status-of-snap-food-aid-as-a-vote-nears-to-end-the-shutdown Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter What to know about the status of SNAP food aid as a vote nears to end the shutdown Nation Nov 12, 2025 12:07 PM EST Many Americans who rely on SNAP benefits to help buy groceries are approaching their third week without aid after President Donald Trump’s administration cut off the program due to the federal government shutdown. The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday opted not to order the government to fully fund a program that serves about 1 in 8 Americans, staying out of a legal debate on whether lower courts were right to make such an order — and maintaining uncertainty about when millions of people will see their benefits. READ MORE: Supreme Court expected to rule on whether full SNAP payments must resume But the U.S. House could send Trump legislation as soon as Wednesday to end the shutdown, a move that would also restore full SNAP funding for November. Here are things to know about how it could go. When SNAP funds become available could vary by state Seesawing court rulings and messages from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers SNAP, have meant that beneficiaries in some states already have received their full monthly allocations while in others they have received nothing. Some states have issued partial payments. States say it’s faster to provide full benefits than it is to do the calculations and computer programming required for partial amounts. At least 19 states plus the District of Columbia issued full benefits to at least some recipients last week, an Associated Press tally found. Among those are Minnesota and New Jersey. Many of them managed to do it in a day or so, in the narrow window between the Nov. 6 court ruling that required the federal government to make full payments and one Nov. 7 by the U.S. Supreme Court that stopped it. Carolyn Vega, a policy analyst with the advocacy group Share Our Strength, said she expects most SNAP participants who haven’t received yet anything in November — including in South Carolina and West Virginia — to receive their benefits within about a week. But there’s a complication. So far, 16 states — including Illinois and Texas — have loaded the EBT cards used in SNAP with partial benefits. Vega said some of those states might run into some technical hurdles to issue the remaining amount. Delays in benefits can be a problem for recipients Even if there’s some clarity that benefits are on the way, exactly when they arrive will matter to millions of Americans. WATCH: How SNAP reductions are impacting local food banks About 42 million lower-income Americans receive SNAP benefits, on average about $190 monthly per person. Many say the benefits don’t and aren’t intended to cover the full cost of groceries in a regular month, even with careful budgeting. It’s worse when benefits are delayed. Doretha Washington, 41, of St. Louis, and her husband have themselves and six children to feed and not enough money to cover that cost. Her husband works servicing heating and cooling systems, but the family still needs SNAP to get by. They had received nothing in November, although Missouri said Tuesday that partial benefits would be issued. “Now it’s making things difficult because we can’t pay our bills in full and keep food in here,” Washington said this week. “I’m down to three days of food and trying to figure out what to do.” She’s has been rationing what they have. Other people have turned to food charities, but are sometimes finding long lines and low supplies. Cutting off funds left state governments scrambling The USDA told states on Oct. 24 that it would not fund the program for November if the shutdown continued. That left states scrambling. Most Democratic-led states sued to have the funding restored. Some Democratic and Republican-led states launched efforts to pay for SNAP benefits using state money, boost food banks and deploy the National Guard to help with food distribution. Another group of states used their money allotted for SNAP benefits only after a judge ordered the Trump administration to cover the full cost for the month. The legislation to reopen the government passed by the Senate on Monday calls for states to be reimbursed for spending their funds to run programs usually paid for by the federal government. It’s not immediately clear, though, which situations might qualify in the case of SNAP. A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue. Donate now By — Geoff Mulvihill, Associated Press Geoff Mulvihill, Associated Press
Many Americans who rely on SNAP benefits to help buy groceries are approaching their third week without aid after President Donald Trump’s administration cut off the program due to the federal government shutdown. The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday opted not to order the government to fully fund a program that serves about 1 in 8 Americans, staying out of a legal debate on whether lower courts were right to make such an order — and maintaining uncertainty about when millions of people will see their benefits. READ MORE: Supreme Court expected to rule on whether full SNAP payments must resume But the U.S. House could send Trump legislation as soon as Wednesday to end the shutdown, a move that would also restore full SNAP funding for November. Here are things to know about how it could go. When SNAP funds become available could vary by state Seesawing court rulings and messages from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers SNAP, have meant that beneficiaries in some states already have received their full monthly allocations while in others they have received nothing. Some states have issued partial payments. States say it’s faster to provide full benefits than it is to do the calculations and computer programming required for partial amounts. At least 19 states plus the District of Columbia issued full benefits to at least some recipients last week, an Associated Press tally found. Among those are Minnesota and New Jersey. Many of them managed to do it in a day or so, in the narrow window between the Nov. 6 court ruling that required the federal government to make full payments and one Nov. 7 by the U.S. Supreme Court that stopped it. Carolyn Vega, a policy analyst with the advocacy group Share Our Strength, said she expects most SNAP participants who haven’t received yet anything in November — including in South Carolina and West Virginia — to receive their benefits within about a week. But there’s a complication. So far, 16 states — including Illinois and Texas — have loaded the EBT cards used in SNAP with partial benefits. Vega said some of those states might run into some technical hurdles to issue the remaining amount. Delays in benefits can be a problem for recipients Even if there’s some clarity that benefits are on the way, exactly when they arrive will matter to millions of Americans. WATCH: How SNAP reductions are impacting local food banks About 42 million lower-income Americans receive SNAP benefits, on average about $190 monthly per person. Many say the benefits don’t and aren’t intended to cover the full cost of groceries in a regular month, even with careful budgeting. It’s worse when benefits are delayed. Doretha Washington, 41, of St. Louis, and her husband have themselves and six children to feed and not enough money to cover that cost. Her husband works servicing heating and cooling systems, but the family still needs SNAP to get by. They had received nothing in November, although Missouri said Tuesday that partial benefits would be issued. “Now it’s making things difficult because we can’t pay our bills in full and keep food in here,” Washington said this week. “I’m down to three days of food and trying to figure out what to do.” She’s has been rationing what they have. Other people have turned to food charities, but are sometimes finding long lines and low supplies. Cutting off funds left state governments scrambling The USDA told states on Oct. 24 that it would not fund the program for November if the shutdown continued. That left states scrambling. Most Democratic-led states sued to have the funding restored. Some Democratic and Republican-led states launched efforts to pay for SNAP benefits using state money, boost food banks and deploy the National Guard to help with food distribution. Another group of states used their money allotted for SNAP benefits only after a judge ordered the Trump administration to cover the full cost for the month. The legislation to reopen the government passed by the Senate on Monday calls for states to be reimbursed for spending their funds to run programs usually paid for by the federal government. It’s not immediately clear, though, which situations might qualify in the case of SNAP. A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue. Donate now