What do you think? Leave a respectful comment.

For newborn babies, human touch may be a brain booster. Photo by Sally Anscombe/via Getty Images

Why a baby’s first touch may set their sense of the world

Relative to other primates, human children enter the world underdeveloped, namely when it comes to our brains. Human gestation would require an additional 9 to 12 months for babies to obtain the same neurological maturity as chimpanzee newborns. As a consequence, our first exposure to the real world sets our developmental trajectory.

This rule may apply most acutely with a baby’s first touch, based on new research from Vanderbilt University and Nationwide Children’s Hospital. Their findings show a baby’s earliest encounters with touch dictate how a child will later perceive caresses and other tactile stimulation. In particular, early medical procedures can dampen a premature child’s ability to perceive gentle touch in the long run.

But rather than toss blame or simply outline deficits in kids, the study presents a new test for determining how to interact with newborns to ensure their sensory development remains on track.

“We’re pretty sure that kangaroo care, breastfeeding and massage are positive,” said Dr. Nathalie Maitre, a neonatologist at Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. “But what we need to be able to do is design interventions in the NICU [neonatal intensive care unit] that are more supportive from a tactile standpoint.”

Maitre reached this conclusion by analyzing the brain activity of 125 newborns (59 full-term and 57 preterm). Each child strapped on an electroencephalogram (EEG) helmet, which tracked their brain responses to gentle puff of air against one of their hands. As a control, the researchers used to a “fake” puff that the baby could still hear, but that was directed away from the hand.

They found the brains of full-term infants lit up with consistent activity within precise time windows, but premature infants reacted differently.

“The more preterm a baby was, the more and more their response to touch was attenuated, compared to full-term infants,” Maitre said. “[Preterm newborns] just don’t process touch the same way, and certainly they don’t process it the way a full-term baby would.”

This photograph shows measuring preterm baby brain function using high-density EEG. Photo by Nationwide Children's

This photograph shows measuring preterm baby brain function using high-density EEG. Photo by Nationwide Children’s

Many factors may influence this contrast. When babies sit in a womb, they receive continuous tactile stimulation. The compression and contractions of the uterus swaddle a baby’s sensory system, but also insulate it from the stress of things like gravity or changes in temperature. The same buffering occurs with the other senses.

“Babies are exposed to sound in the womb, but it’s not the same kind of sound. The sound is filtered. The sound doesn’t come with the whole range of frequencies. It’s muted in volume, ” Maitre said. “Whereas in the NICU, it’s alarms, voices that are not usually directed the baby or muffled by the isolet.”

Most of this sensory exposure for preterm children isn’t inherently harmful, but it is atypical relative to spending one’s final gestational weeks inside a womb. Maitre said this atypical experience may explain why many preterm infants can find a touch — even a gentle one — unpleasant, or why some fail to react or overreact to sounds.

“Infants receiving neonatal intensive care are highly sensitive to their environment,” Dr. Rebeccah Slater, a pediatric neuroscientist at University of Oxford, told NewsHour via email. “This study suggests that the experiences an infant will have while receiving neonatal intensive care can alter how the infant brain responds to light touch when they are ready to be discharged from hospital.”

Slater was drawn in particular to the study’s findings on pain. The investigation showed supportive care — breastfeeding and skin-to-skin care — elicited a stronger brain response in newborns. Meanwhile, painful experiences — medical procedures that involved skin punctures or tube insertions — dampened a child’s response to touch.

This suppression occurred even though these medical procedures included the use of pain relievers, like pediatric opioids, or sugar water. Likewise, Slater’s group has found medical remedies may unintentionally mask behavioral responses to pain.

“Newborn infants who require medical treatment can undergo frequent invasive procedures during a critical period of neurodevelopment,” Slated said. “However, adequate pain relief is infrequently and inconsistently provided.”

What does all of this info mean for doctors and parents? By establishing a clear pattern of brain activity for a regular response to touch, Maitre and her colleagues created a benchmark for measuring the effectiveness of neonatal care. As they write in study, published in Current Biology, “NICU treatments used to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes rely heavily on touch,” and the team plans to dig deeper into what types of touch are the most beneficial in the long run.

Meanwhile, Maitre recommends that parents take advantage of NICU follow-up clinics if possible. Doctors can gauge if a child’s tactile sensitivity and whether the infant is either unaware or too aware of their senses.

Sign up to get our Science email.

We’ll explore the wide worlds of science, health and technology with content from our science squad and other places we're finding news

* indicates required

Latest News