The video for this story is not available, but you can still read the transcript below.
No image

Historian Taylor Branch on the ‘Clinton Tapes’

Pulitzer Prize-winning author and historian Taylor Branch speaks with Jeffrey Brown about his new book, "The Clinton Tapes."

Read the Full Transcript


    It's an intimate look at the modern presidency compiled from late-night conversations at the White House between Bill Clinton and his friend, journalist and historian Taylor Branch.

    The talks recorded from 1993 to 2001 range from personal observations, to domestic politics, and international flash points, and became the basis for a new book, "The Clinton Tapes: Wrestling History with the President."

    Taylor Branch is Pulitzer Prize-winning author of a three-volume biography of Martin Luther King Jr. and his times. He joins me now.

    Welcome to you.


    Thank you, Jeffrey.


    Let's establish first what this is and what it's — it's not. It's not a direct transcript of these tapes. You would have a conversation, and then hand the tapes to the president.


    Handed them to him.

    It was designed, at my advice, to build his confidence that he could control them, and that he could put as much material unguarded and candid for the future record as possible. And, to do that, he — he needed to have control over them. So, he actually took the tapes that I recorded on my machines.

    I had two, in case one malfunctioned. He took them and hid them away. I didn't find out for years where he was hiding them himself. But, in the second term, he started having to leave and asking me to put them away in his little — in his closet up in a drawer where his socks were.


    And you — you were then — on your drive away, you would record your thoughts and take notes later on. And that became the basis of this book.


    That's right. I had to drive home to Baltimore, so I would pop another tape in there, and because I believe in presidential history and — so much, I wanted to record everything I could remember about those contacts. And that became the basis for the book.


    And you describe this in the book as — quote — "somewhere between politics, journalism and history."

    Now, what does that — what does that mean? How — how should we read this?