By — Geoff Bennett Geoff Bennett By — Frank Carlson Frank Carlson By — Mike Fritz Mike Fritz Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/tressie-mcmillan-cottom-joins-geoff-bennett-for-our-settle-in-podcast Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Transcript Audio For our podcast “Settle In,” Geoff Bennett spoke with University of North Carolina sociologist and New York Times columnist Tressie McMillan Cottom. They explored what's caused a loss of trust in institutions, what the Trump administration has revealed about the way power works in this country and how to find hope during the onslaught of difficult daily news. Read the Full Transcript Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy. They may contain errors. Amna Nawaz: We turn now to our PBS News podcast "Settle In."In the latest episode, we explore what's caused a loss of trust in institutions, what the Trump administration has revealed about the way power works in this country, and how to find hope during the onslaught of difficult daily news. Geoff Bennett: I recently spoke about all of this with the University of North Carolina Professor and New York Times columnist Tressie McMillan Cottom. Here's an excerpt.How much of our political dysfunction is actually an attention problem? And how much has the media economy reshaped what kinds of stories and people get rewarded? Tressie McMillan Cottom, The New York Times: Yes, I think there is something to the fact that obviously our attention has been monetized in a way that is really antithetical to how human curiosity has worked for millennia.But I do think we overstate that fact, because it kind of sounds like, when you start talking about so many things are competing for our attention, and so we just can't capture people long enough to tell them what matters, right, and to move them politically, I think it's a bit of a cop-out, right?It is true that it is hard to compete with TikTok and it is difficult to compete with memes. And it is absolutely true that the media ecosystem now rewards the production of cheap, emotion-driven content over meaningful information and news.But it is also the case that that is not naturally occurring. That too was a political choice. It is a political choice not to regulate technology companies. It was a political choice. I would point out that both the Democrats and the Republicans have had an opportunity to do and have failed to do so.No one has shown a political appetite, real, strong political appetite for regulating technology companies, because at the root of that is what I would argue is the real problem, which is extreme wealth inequality and the extent to which money has infiltrated the -- our systems of governance and certainly campaign financing.And so we have been willing to cede our attention in the name of money, but that was a political choice. And now we find ourselves reckoning with the fact that attention cannot be captured long enough to tell people the truth, the objective truth, about what is happening to them.But that is, again, a lesson about what happens when one side has more power than the other. I don't think that is a foregone conclusion, however. It is absolutely a political choice to say that our media ecosystem needs to have a civic core to it, right? It is not a foregone conclusion that we all need to just accept artificial intelligence is here and we need to turn over our privacy and our citizenship rights to it.Those are choices, right? And I think that, when we focus too much on whether or not people spend too much time on TikTok, it lets a lot of political actors off the hook. Geoff Bennett: Amid this sense of exhaustion, what does renewal look like, when it's not that people are apathetic? It's just that people are tired. They're worn out. Tressie McMillan Cottom: Yes, there is a lot of exhaustion.I would argue, though, that much in the way that we sort of have misconstrued the idea of taking care of ourselves and taking care of each other, as, you know, self-care, solve your problems with a bubble bath, we kind of have that problem writ large with politics, right, that if you are exhausted and overwhelmed by the onslaught of negative news, that you sort of need to retreat, right, and you need to withdraw.When, in fact, everything from research to history to art will tell you it's the exact opposite, that sometimes we aren't exhausted because we are aware of too much. We are exhausted because we are doing too little.The antidote, I think, to political exhaustion, the type that we are talking about is that we are getting so much passive information and we have so few opportunities to act. We are tired then not from doing too much, but from doing too little.People who feel agentic aren't as tired. They are not as easily overwhelmed. So, if you are exhausted by the onslaught of bad news, go to a protest. If you are exhausted by social policy that is demonizing children, start teaching children how to read.The more time you spend doing something, whatever it is possible for you to do in your space in the world, the less exhausted you are by the onslaught of information that really wins when it can convince you that the only thing you can do is watch what is happening to you. Geoff Bennett: And you can find that full conversation and all episodes of "Settle In" from PBS News on our YouTube page and wherever you get your podcasts. Listen to this Segment Watch Watch the Full Episode PBS NewsHour from Jan 26, 2026 By — Geoff Bennett Geoff Bennett Geoff Bennett serves as co-anchor and co-managing editor of PBS News Hour. He also serves as an NBC News and MSNBC political contributor. @GeoffRBennett By — Frank Carlson Frank Carlson @frankncarlson By — Mike Fritz Mike Fritz Mike Fritz is the deputy senior producer for field segments at PBS NewsHour.