Big Brother Is Watching You Drive

Share:
In this March 18, 2011 photo, Maplewood, Minn. police officer Steven Hiebert prepares to go out on patrol using the License Plate Ready System, which consists of a camera that photographs license plates and then compares them with those in a database of stolen vehicles. (AP Photo/Star Tribune,Jim Gehrz)

In this March 18, 2011 photo, Maplewood, Minn. police officer Steven Hiebert prepares to go out on patrol using the License Plate Ready System, which consists of a camera that photographs license plates and then compares them with those in a database of stolen vehicles. (AP Photo/Star Tribune,Jim Gehrz) (AP Photo/Star Tribune,Jim Gehrz)

July 17, 2013

Law enforcement agencies nationwide increasingly rely on automatic license-plate readers to track and store information on American drivers, a new report found, in the latest revelation in how the government gathers data on its citizens.

About 75 percent of federal, state and local agencies use these readers — cameras mounted on patrol cars, road signs and bridges — that photograph vehicles, scan license plates and record the time and date, according to the report (pdf) by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The system checks the plate numbers against a “hot list” of cars that have been stolen or used in a crime, and alerts police when it finds a match. But it also stores records on millions of innocent drivers.

FRONTLINE reported on the plate readers in the film Top Secret America, which showed that the federal government has encouraged their use as part of its effort to use state and local law enforcement agencies to help gather intelligence. (Watch the clip to see a plate reader in action.)

The use of these cameras is expanding, bolstered by millions in federal and state grants, the report found. The Department of Homeland Security alone spent more than $50 million in grants to help law enforcement agencies buy readers over the past five years. A full 85 percent of agencies said they planned to increase their use in the next five years, according to a 2011 survey (pdf) conducted by the Police Executive Research Forum.

But even as their use increases, the plate readers don’t generate many hits. In Maryland, for example, the system registered one hit for every 500 plates recorded. Of the hits, 97 percent were for a suspended or revoked registration, or a violation of the state emissions inspection program.

And while some departments delete the data after hours or days, others keep records for years or even indefinitely, even on cars not linked to a crime. Departments are also beginning to pool the data in regional databases, such as those at the 70-some fusion centers set up nationwide to coordinate counterterrorism efforts among law enforcement, which could lead to even less regulation of the data.

Private companies have also gotten into the business, building up huge databases to sell to law enforcement. MVTrac, for example, says it was data on “a large majority” of registered vehicles in the U.S., the report found. The Digital Recognition Network gathers data on up to 50 million cars each month. Vigilant Solutions has more than 800 million license plate records in its database, which is used by the Department of Homeland Security and more than two thousand other law enforcement agencies, the report said.

One major concern with the readers, the ACLU said, is that the scans could be used by police to track innocent people, or target groups based on their ethnic background or personal or political beliefs. In at least one instance in the U.S., that’s already happened.

In New York, police officers in unmarked cars used license plate readers to record the attendees at local mosques, the Associated Press found, as part of a broader effort to spy on the city’s Muslim community.

The ACLU filed hundreds of Freedom of Information Act requests for the data from state, federal and local agencies, asking how they regulated use of the automatic readers. Read the full report here (pdf). Find out about what’s happening in your state here.


Sarah Childress

Sarah Childress, Senior Editor & Director of Local Projects, FRONTLINE

Twitter:

@sarah_childress

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

In First Debate, President Trump Again Declines to Unequivocally Condemn White Supremacist Groups
His avoidance of doing so on the presidential debate stage echoed his response to the deadly Charlottesville rally.
September 30, 2020
4 FRONTLINE Documentaries to Watch on Tonight’s Presidential Debate Topics
From the coronavirus to the Supreme Court, watch these FRONTLINE documentaries for context on four key subjects that are slated for discussion in the presidential debate.
September 29, 2020
FRONTLINE (PBS) Wins Four News & Documentary Emmy Awards
FRONTLINE has been honored with four 2020 News & Documentary Emmy Awards.
September 23, 2020
Behind ‘The Choice’: How We Filmed 47 Interviews in a Pandemic
FRONTLINE shares a behind-the-scenes look at how filmmakers conducted 47 remote interviews for "The Choice 2020: Trump vs. Biden" against the backdrop of COVID-19.
September 22, 2020