Court-Martial Recommended for WikiLeaks Suspect

January 12, 2012

For more, watch our films WikiSecrets and The Private Life of Bradley Manning.

Pfc. Bradley Manning should be referred to a general court-martial, Lt. Col. Paul Almanza, the investigating officer assigned to Manning’s pre-trial hearing, recommended today.

Almanza has been deliberating on the evidence presented in the hearing since it ended just before the Christmas holiday.  Today he announced that the charges were in proper order, and “reasonable grounds exist to believe that the accused committed the offenses alleged.”

Manning is charged with “aiding the enemy, wrongfully causing intelligence to be published on the internet knowing that it is accessible to the enemy; theft of public property or records; transmitting defense information; fraud and related activity in connection with computers;” and for violating Army regulations related to information security.  Manning could face the death penalty if convicted, although prosecutors have already said they will not pursue it.

Almanza’s recommendation has been sent to the Special Court-Martial Convening Authority, which is typically a pro-forma move, since it is unlikely that crimes of this nature would be dealt with in a special, as opposed to general court-martial. (Special Courts-Martial generally deal with less serious charges.)  The Special Court-Martial Convening Authority will then forward the matter to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority, Maj. Gen. Michael S. Linnington.  Maj. Gen. Linnington will then decide whether or not to recommend a general court martial for Pfc. Manning.

The recommendation of the investigating officer is almost always followed, so barring a deal or some other surprise, it’s quite likely that Bradley Manning will be facing a court-martial some time this spring.

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Support Provided By Learn more