Ex-WikiLeaks Spokesman Destroyed Thousands of Unpublished Docs


August 22, 2011

Former WikiLeaks spokesman Daniel Domscheit-Berg has told Der Spiegel that he destroyed more than 3,500 unpublished files he took with him when he left the group. Domscheit-Berg says he shredded the files — which according to WikiLeaks’ Twitter feed include the U.S. “no-fly” list, five gigabytes of material from Bank of America and whistleblower data on neo-Nazi organizations — because he wanted “to ensure that the sources are not compromised.”

WikiLeaks hit back at Domscheit-Berg both on its Twitter feed and in a statement from Julian Assange, in which Assange maintained “WikiLeaks does not record or retain source identifying information” and suggested Domscheit-Berg has ties to U.S. and Israeli intelligence.

The very personal feud between the two men goes back to the fall of 2010, when Domscheit-Berg left Wikileaks to form a competitor, OpenLeaks. Before that, Domscheit-Berg says the two men disagreed over WikiLeaks’ direction, including how fast the organization should grow, and whether WikiLeaks should redact the names of U.S. informants in the Afghan and Iraq war logs.

“[It] was at this time … when [Assange] started to behave irresponsibly and when he also made clear that you might have a different view, but he doesn’t care very much about your views, and it’s either his way or the highway,” Domscheit-Berg told FRONTLINE producer Martin Smith back in April. “It just got really abusive.” For his part, Assange described Domscheit-Berg to us as “unstable” and said that hiring him was “the greatest mistake.”

Domscheit-Berg and Assange also disagreed over WikiLeaks’ publication of nearly 300,000 classified U.S. diplomatic cables. At that point, Bradley Manning had already been arrested and had allegedly mentioned the leak of the cables in his online chats with former hacker Adrian Lamo. “It was clear for me these diplomatic cables should not be released,” Domscheit-Berg told us. “There’s a very hard distinction you have to take. What is more important, bringing the truth to the light or protecting one person? … My gut and my heart say you should protect the person.”

While Assange told us in April that WikiLeaks was “continuing to step up its publishing speed,” its online submission system has been down for more than a year and the only way to leak documents to the group is to send them via snail mail to a P.O. Box in Australia. And though it was released to the public in January, OpenLeaks, which says it will make whistleblowing “safer” and “more widespread,” does not appear to be accepting submissions yet either.

Update (Aug. 24): The dispute over exactly which files Domscheit-Berg destroyed has gotten murkier. “I can confirm that there was a No-Fly list in the batch,” Domscheit-Berg told Wired‘s Kim Zetter in an e-mail yesterday, but he said that WikiLeaks’ claims about other destroyed documents, such as the Bank of America files, were “false and misleading.”

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

Handling of Public Protests a 'Stress Test' for Police Reform
Violent outbursts have marked the period of unrest since George Floyd died May 25, after Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin pinned the 46-year-old Black man to the ground by his neck. In many cases, police have responded with force to disperse protesters, captured on cameras nationwide — including in Cleveland, Chicago, Seattle and Portland, all cities that were already under court-enforced agreements to reform their police departments. Independent monitors overseeing those agreements say it's possible police could find themselves out of compliance for how they've responded to the recent unrest.
September 18, 2020
Amid George Floyd Protests, a Critical Question: Can the Feds Fix American Policing?
As millions of people rallied in the streets this summer demanding an end to police violence, more than a dozen cities were quietly working on their own police reform process — in conference rooms and court hearings.  
September 16, 2020
A Newark Officer Was Filmed Punching Someone. Jelani Cobb Asked a Police Union Head If It Was Justified.
Their resulting conversation in the new FRONTLINE documentary “Policing the Police 2020” illustrates the debate over use of force in policing: what’s legal, what’s justified and whether those definitions should change.
September 15, 2020
Countdown to "The Choice 2020: Trump vs. Biden"
Starting today with Mary Trump, we're pre-releasing key interviews from the making of our Sept. 22 special, "The Choice 2020: Trump vs. Biden."
September 14, 2020