How the Stock Market & U.S. Household Income Diverged After the 2008 Crash
Above, a still from the documentary "The Power of the Fed," which looks at the Federal Reserve policy of quantitative easing, developed in the wake of the 2008 crash. Under QE, the stock market and U.S. median household income have followed differing trajectories.
When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, the Federal Reserve tried to avoid economic meltdown by lowering interest rates to near-zero and buying up trillions of dollars in securities — an attempt to make it cheaper for cash-strapped Americans to borrow money and to shore up the financial system.
As reported in the new FRONTLINE documentary The Power of the Fed, that same strategy helped the economy recover after the 2008 financial crisis, but it also left many American households behind.
Mohamad El-Erian — who in 2009 ran the world’s largest bond fund, PIMCO — told FRONTLINE the Fed’s response to the 2008 crash benefitted investors more than ordinary American workers.
“The Fed was very successful, in terms of moving asset prices. It was much less successful in moving the economy,” El-Erian said in The Power of the Fed, resulting in what he called a major disconnect “between Main Street and Wall Street, between the economy and finance.”
To illustrate that disconnect, FRONTLINE has charted the performance of two major stock indices — the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite — against the growth of median household income in the U.S. from 2005 to 2019, the latest year for which household income data is available.
According to Michael Ash, a professor of economics and public policy at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, median household income is a useful tool for assessing how ordinary Americans are faring: “a good Main Street measure of economic wellbeing,” he told FRONTLINE.
Growth of the Stock Market vs. U.S. Household Income
Charting percent change, 2005 to 2019
- Household Income
- S&P 500