Judge Approves NFL Concussion Settlement

A Seattle Seahawks helmet on the field during warms up before the NFL Super Bowl XLVIII football game against the Denver Broncos at MetLife Stadium on Sunday, Feb. 2, 2014, in East Rutherford, N.J. The Seahawks won the game 43-8. (AP Photo/Perry Knotts)

Photo: A Seattle Seahawks helmet on the field during warms up before the NFL Super Bowl XLVIII football game on Sunday, Feb. 2, 2014. (AP Photo/Perry Knotts)

July 7, 2014

A federal judge on Monday granted preliminary approval to a settlement between the NFL and roughly 4,500 former players who are suing the league for allegedly concealing the long-term health risks of concussions.

The ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Anita Brody clears the way for a vote on the proposed settlement by the league’s roughly 18,000 retired players and their beneficiaries.

“A class action settlement that offers prompt relief is superior to the likely alternative — years of expensive, difficult and uncertain litigation with no assurance of recovery, while retired players’ physical and mental conditions continue to deteriorate,” Brody wrote.

Judge Brody’s decision comes just 10 days after the NFL agreed to remove a cap on any damages it will pay as part of the settlement. In January, she rejected an original settlement of $765 million, saying she did not believe that the $675 million set aside for damages would be enough to compensate every player who might one day require aid.

The agreement allows for payments as high as $5 million for league veterans diagnosed with Lou Gehrig’s disease; as much as $4 million for a death involving traumatic brain injury; and as much as $3 million for players suffering from dementia. It includes $75 million for baseline medical exams for retired players and $10 million for concussion research and education, but it does not require the NFL to admit that it hid any information from players about the dangers of repeated hits to the head.

“This is an extraordinary settlement for retired NFL players and their families — from those who suffer with neurocognitive illnesses today, to those who are currently healthy but fear they may develop symptoms decades into the future,” plaintiffs’ attorneys Sol Weiss and Christopher Seeger said in a statement.

Recently, several players have voiced reservations about the agreement. Last week, a group of seven retired players filed a motion in federal court in Philadelphia, urging Brody to reject the settlement. The players called the agreement a “lousy deal” for players whose symptoms do not qualify them for compensation.

Still, with the cap on damages now removed, many legal experts predict the settlement will win approval from a majority of the league’s retired players. Players will have until October to decider whether to opt out or object to the deal. A hearing on the final settlement is scheduled for November.

Jason M. Breslow

Jason M. Breslow, Digital Editor



In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

Cheat Codes: Students Search For Shortcuts as Virtual Schooling Expands
Cheating has always been an issue in schools, but there is little getting in the way for students today. Shared answers have become even more accessible as districts have adopted or expanded their use of popular online learning programs.
October 23, 2020
As Purdue Pharma Agrees to Settle with the DOJ, Revisit Its Role in the Opioid Crisis
The proposed $8.3 billion settlement between Purdue Pharma, maker of OxyContin, and the federal government is the latest in a battle over who is responsible for the nation’s opioid crisis, as covered by FRONTLINE in "Chasing Heroin" and "Opioids, Inc."
October 21, 2020
With Election 2020 Underway, a Key Provision of the Voting Rights Act Languishes
Against the backdrop of a pandemic and a divisive presidential election, legislation to restore key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, following the landmark 2013 Supreme Court 2013 decision Shelby v. Holder, remains locked in Congress.
October 21, 2020
We Investigated 'Whose Vote Counts.' Our Findings Unfold Tonight.
A note from our executive producer about the new documentary 'Whose Vote Counts,' premiering Oct. 20.
October 20, 2020