Judge Rejects $765 Million NFL Concussion Settlement

Share:

January 14, 2014

A federal judge has declined to approve a proposed $765 million settlement between the NFL and thousands of former players suing the league over head injuries, ruling that the agreement may not go far enough to cover every player who may need aid.

The agreement, which was reached in August, set aside $675 million to compensate players for a specific list of injuries. League veterans who have been diagnosed with Lou Gehrig’s disease, for example, would be eligible for awards as high as $5 million. As much as $4 million would be awarded for a death involving traumatic brain injury, while players suffering from dementia would be be eligible for payments as high as $3 million.

More than 4,500 have signed on to the lawsuit, but according to U.S. District Judge Anita Brody, as many as 20,000 former players may one day be eligible for payment under the terms of the deal.

“I am primarily concerned that not all retired NFL football players who ultimately receive a qualifying diagnosis, or their related claimants, will be paid,” Brody wrote in her decision on Tuesday.

“Even if only 10 percent of retired NFL football players eventually receive a qualifying diagnosis,” she wrote, “it is difficult to see how the monetary award fund would have the funds available over its lifespan to pay all claimants at these significant award levels.”

Brody’s decision does not shatter the settlement. She ordered both sides to provide documentation showing that the deal will be large enough to cover all eligible parties.

The ruling marks a setback for the NFL in its bid to end a legal battle ignited by the discovery of the degenerative brain disease, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) in the brain of the late Pittsburgh Steelers center, Mike Webster.

In 2011, players brought suit against the NFL, claiming league officials knowingly concealed a link between traumatic brain injury and professional football. The backstory of the case is the focus of the FRONTLINE investigation, League of Denial: The NFL’s Concussion Crisis.

By settling the lawsuit the NFL avoided a potentially embarrassing discovery phase that was likely to draw new attention to the medical histories of league alumni. The agreement also ensured that league officials would not have to testify under oath about its handling of brain injuries. Players had initially sought $2 billion, but the suit ended up in court-ordered mediation after the judge told players’ attorneys their case was in “real danger of being dismissed,” ESPN’s Outside the Lines reported earlier this year.

“We respect Judge Brody’s request for additional information as a step towards preliminary approval,” a league spokesman said in a statement to FRONTLINE. “We will work with the plaintiffs’ attorneys to supply that information promptly to the court and special master. We are confident that the settlement is fair and adequate, and look forward to demonstrating that to the court.”

If Brody ultimately approves the agreement, players will have a 60-day window to decide on whether or not to opt in.


Jason M. Breslow

Jason M. Breslow, Digital Editor

Twitter:

@jbrezlow

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

Cheat Codes: Students Search For Shortcuts as Virtual Schooling Expands
Cheating has always been an issue in schools, but there is little getting in the way for students today. Shared answers have become even more accessible as districts have adopted or expanded their use of popular online learning programs.
October 23, 2020
As Purdue Pharma Agrees to Settle with the DOJ, Revisit Its Role in the Opioid Crisis
The proposed $8.3 billion settlement between Purdue Pharma, maker of OxyContin, and the federal government is the latest in a battle over who is responsible for the nation’s opioid crisis, as covered by FRONTLINE in "Chasing Heroin" and "Opioids, Inc."
October 21, 2020
With Election 2020 Underway, a Key Provision of the Voting Rights Act Languishes
Against the backdrop of a pandemic and a divisive presidential election, legislation to restore key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, following the landmark 2013 Supreme Court 2013 decision Shelby v. Holder, remains locked in Congress.
October 21, 2020
We Investigated 'Whose Vote Counts.' Our Findings Unfold Tonight.
A note from our executive producer about the new documentary 'Whose Vote Counts,' premiering Oct. 20.
October 20, 2020