Push to Reform the Freedom of Information Act Collapses in House


The Capitol dome is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Dec. 11, 2012. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

December 12, 2014

A bill to reform the Freedom of Information Act, a key pillar of federal open government laws, was defeated this week after the House of Representatives failed to hold a vote on the plan before adjourning for the year.

The death of the FOIA Improvement Act marked a stinging defeat for government transparency advocates, and came despite broad bipartisan support in Congress. The bill won unanimous approval in the Senate on Monday, and in February, a nearly identical version of the measure cleared the House by a 410-0 vote.

But despite widespread support for the measure in both chambers of Congress, Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio) tabled the bill on Thursday, leaving the future of the two-year reform effort in doubt.

“And Boehner kills #FOIA improvements,” tweeted Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), one of the Senate co-sponsors of the bill.

The Freedom of Information Act, passed in 1966, was intended to allow the public prompt access to government documents. The law requires federal agencies to respond to information requests within 20 days, and to state their reasons for denying a request or redacting information. The law was intended to allow agencies to withhold disclosures that would harm national defense.

The law hasn’t always worked as planned, though, leaving government agencies with backlogs that in some instances date back decades.

President Obama, in an attempt to address the problem, issued an order to federal agencies on his first day in office in 2009. Agencies were to adopt a “presumption in favor of disclosure,” proactively releasing documents rather than making them secret. In other words, agencies were to comply with FOIA requests.

But the order didn’t stick.

According to a March 2014 audit by the National Security Archive, a non-governmental research institute and heavy user of the Freedom of Information Act, half of all federal agencies, including all agencies responsible for defense and counterterrorism, had failed to adapt their policies to fit the president’s order.

The FOIA Improvement Act, co-sponsored by Leahy and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), was designed to turn that largely unheeded order into law.

A keystone of the bill was a provision limiting the use of the so-called B(5) exemption, which allows agencies to withhold internal communications, as well as communications that are sent between agencies during deliberations over policy. The legislation would limit that exemption to documents that are less than 25 years old.

Open government advocates argue that this exemption could be applied to nearly any government document, and note that the use of the exemption has skyrocketed recently. It was used to deny more than 80,000 requests for information in 2013, or 12 percent of FOIA requests that year, the highest number of denials recorded during the Obama administration, according to an Associated Press investigation.

Now the proposed reforms will have to wait until the next session of Congress, when it’s unclear if lawmakers will take up them up again. As Boehner said on Thursday before closing this year’s House session, “I have no knowledge of what the plan is for that bill.”

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

As Purdue Pharma Agrees to Settle with the DOJ, Revisit Its Role in the Opioid Crisis
The proposed $8.3 billion settlement between Purdue Pharma, maker of OxyContin, and the federal government is the latest in a battle over who is responsible for the nation’s opioid crisis, as covered by FRONTLINE in "Chasing Heroin" and "Opioids, Inc."
October 21, 2020
With Election 2020 Underway, a Key Provision of the Voting Rights Act Languishes
Against the backdrop of a pandemic and a divisive presidential election, legislation to restore key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, following the landmark 2013 Supreme Court 2013 decision Shelby v. Holder, remains locked in Congress.
October 21, 2020
We Investigated 'Whose Vote Counts.' Our Findings Unfold Tonight.
A note from our executive producer about the new documentary 'Whose Vote Counts,' premiering Oct. 20.
October 20, 2020
How Associating Mail-in Ballots with Voter Fraud Became a Political Tool
Unsubstantiated warnings of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election echo a 1980s case involving Black civil rights activists and then-Alabama Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
October 20, 2020