Why Have There Been So Few Sexual Assault Prosecutions In the Agriculture Industry?


In partnership with:
June 25, 2013

The FBI lists rape as the second most serious violent crime behind murder. But only one out of 20 victims will ever see a rapist convicted of a felony.

Police make arrests in fewer than one-third of the rape and sexual assault cases brought to their attention, according to a recent Department of Justice report. And most cases are never reported to police in the first place.

Unless a woman reports to police soon after the rape, before showering or changing clothes, there is often very little evidence of the alleged crime.  It costs law enforcement about $1,000 to run a full DNA test on a rape kit, and forensic evidence often only proves that sex — not necessarily rape — took place. Absent additional witnesses, the man can still argue it was consensual.

For undocumented women who are raped or sexually assaulted — and who may fear losing their jobs or being deported if they bring charges against their attacker — the stakes are significantly higher, according to attorneys and immigration advocates.

Robert Reich, professor of public policy at UC Berkeley and former U.S. Secretary of Labor, believes law enforcement faces a “fundamental schizophrenia” between enforcing immigration laws and protecting the civil and human rights of people in this country.  “How can sheriffs carry out both missions? The answer is that they can’t,” Reich said.

But the FBI and Department of Justice think otherwise.  They insist that rape and sexual assault should be investigated and prosecuted by local authorities.

“Rape is considered a local crime. It would be fair to say it is not in our jurisdiction,” said Beth Lefebvre, a spokesperson for the FBI.  “Even serial killers sometimes do not fall under federal jurisdiction,” she said.  “We can’t open a federal case on a local rape.  It’s just the law.”

However, Reich argues that in the 1960s, the FBI stepped in to investigate the murder of civil rights workers in Mississippi because local police, who were complicit in the killings, were unwilling to investigate.

“If local law enforcement can’t or won’t handle it, because of some set of institutional or personal biases, then it would seem to me that we’ve got to rely on the FBI and national law enforcement,” Reich said. “Why shouldn’t the Justice Department be prosecuting people for violating the most fundamental of civil rights?”

Lisel Holdenried, an attorney with California Rural Legal Assistance (CRLA) who represents agricultural workers, knows how rare it is for even the most egregious cases to result in criminal prosecutions.  CRLA has represented dozens of female farmworkers who claim they were sexually assaulted.  But only one recent case has resulted in a criminal conviction.

The case involved a supervisor at a berry farm in San Benito County, Calif. who allegedly penetrated one of his female workers with a foreign object and forced her to touch his genitals.

The supervisor pleaded no contest to two counts of sexual battery and began serving a three-year prison sentence in April 2013.

“The case is an anomaly,” Holdenried explained.  Her client immediately told the farm’s human resources manager, who brought her to the sheriff’s office where she filed a report within five hours of the incident.

“At the end of the day, that’s what’s supposed to happen,” Holdenried said.

In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

As Purdue Pharma Agrees to Settle with the DOJ, Revisit Its Role in the Opioid Crisis
The proposed $8.3 billion settlement between Purdue Pharma, maker of OxyContin, and the federal government is the latest in a battle over who is responsible for the nation’s opioid crisis, as covered by FRONTLINE in "Chasing Heroin" and "Opioids, Inc."
October 21, 2020
With Election 2020 Underway, a Key Provision of the Voting Rights Act Languishes
Against the backdrop of a pandemic and a divisive presidential election, legislation to restore key provisions of the Voting Rights Act, following the landmark 2013 Supreme Court 2013 decision Shelby v. Holder, remains locked in Congress.
October 21, 2020
We Investigated 'Whose Vote Counts.' Our Findings Unfold Tonight.
A note from our executive producer about the new documentary 'Whose Vote Counts,' premiering Oct. 20.
October 20, 2020
How Associating Mail-in Ballots with Voter Fraud Became a Political Tool
Unsubstantiated warnings of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election echo a 1980s case involving Black civil rights activists and then-Alabama Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
October 20, 2020