My Father, My Brother, and Me

Producers' Forum

Video Stories - Watch short stories Dave Iverson and Michael Schwarz filmed over the past two years while making My Father, My Brother, and Me.

Tiny Cells, Big Debate

By David Iverson on January 16, 2009 5:33 AM | Comments (1)

In November of 1998, two things happened that put Parkinson's in the headlines.

One was Michael J. Fox stepping forward and revealing his struggle with the disease, and the other had to do with a research breakthrough: the discovery of embryonic stem cells as a potential route to a cure. While the first sparked both admiration and support, the second proved far more contentious. Because embryonic stem cells can become any tissue in the body, they've been the source of enormous hope for fixing certain conditions, Parkinson's among them. But because the source of the cells are tiny frozen embryos left over from fertility clinics, it's also been the source of controversy, and within a few years, President Bush established strictly limited federal funding guidelines for embryonic stem cell research (guidelines that the Obama administration is expected to change ... keep your eye on the headlines in the coming weeks).

Like so many topics in our political culture, this debate has often been polarizing, colored by rhetoric instead of reason. But two of the most articulate commentators on this topic are columnists Michael Kinsley and Charles Krauthammer. Kinsley has Parkinson's and wrote a wonderfully candid column about his own "coming out" in 2001 that also includes his views on stem cells as an option we can't afford not to explore. Krauthammer suffers from a spinal cord injury that might also someday benefit from embryonic stem cell research, but he raises thoughtful concerns about the moral issues. While he thinks the guidelines established by the Bush administration were too narrow, he worries that we may be rushing into very murky terrain. Here's one of his columns on the subject.

You'll hear from both of them in our film -- it's now less than two weeks to our online launch! -- but I would also encourage you to browse their writings. Their views are worth exploring beyond what we were able to fit in our 60 minute show.

And as always, we're interested in hearing what you think as well. Where do you come down on this important debate?  



Charmin said on February 4, 2009 9:48 AM:

As a mother I can understand the objection to embryonic stem cell research, but as a person that this or another catastrophic disease could effect I can see the need for it. In our country we allow abortion and disposal of embryos with the signing of a form, is it not safe to say that we should allow an embryonic parent the same right to say that they would rather have their unused embryos used for research over being destroyed. If we use the logic that by using an embryo for research is "killing" a potential person, then the same logic dictates that all embryos are potential people and therefore can not be destroyed at any time - even after they are no longer deemed viable, as this would be "killing" a potential person. While I have never had personal experience with Parkinsons disease, I have friends that could potentially be helped with stem cell therapy due to their struggles with A.L.S., Alzhiemers, and spinal injury. If the people mandating the legislation, or one of their loved ones, were suddenly given a diagnosis of an illness that could be potentially be treated with stem cell therapy, my guess is that they would change their tune and be an advocate, not an opponent.

Leave a comment

posted january 29, 2009

my father, my brother, and me home page · watch online · dvd/transcript · credits · site map
FRONTLINE series home · privacy policy · journalistic guidelines

FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
Web Site Copyright ©1995-2014 WGBH Educational Foundation