Bellies full of microplastic rob baby fish of their basic instincts
When exposed to microplastics, baby fish stop eating natural food and prefer consuming the pollutant, according to a report from ecologists at Uppsala University in Sweden. The dietary switch derails the basic instincts of the fish, the researchers found, elevating the likelihood of being caught by predators. The findings may explain why populations of European perch (Perca fluviatilis) — the main species analyzed in the study — have declined in the Baltic Sea.
“Perch are common and popular recreational fish in Sweden,” said Oona Lönnstedt, an Uppsala ecologist and the project’s leader. “But they have seen continuous and rapid declines in density and abundance since the mid-1990s in the Baltic Sea.”
Microplastics litter the Earth’s oceans. The particles typically measure less than five millimeters (one-fifth of an inch) in size, and recent estimates suggest up to 236,000 metric tons wash into the oceans each year. That’s equivalent to the weight of 1,300 blue whales, and it may represent just one percent of the total contained in oceans. The Baltic Sea carries about 25 to 40 plastic particles per gallon of water — or 229 quadrillion pieces across its entire volume.
Lönnstedt’s study examined how microplastics influence every stage of European perch development. The team started with eggs collected from the Baltic Sea. They raised 60 of these embryos in three tanks carrying either no microplastics, an average amount observed in parts of the Baltic Sea (40 particles per gallon) or an extreme level (300 particles per gallon).
Sans pollution, the eggs hatched about 96 percent of the time, but birth rates fell with both average (89 percent) and extreme (81 percent) quantities of microplastics.Things got weirder when the animals grew older. The researchers raised European perch for 10 days in regular water with the perch’s favorite food, brine shrimp, and then added microplastics to the tanks.
“The biggest surprise in this study was the fact that larvae preferentially ate microplastic particles,” said Lönnstedt, whose study was published June 2 in the journal Science. “They literally stuffed themselves with the microbeads and ignored their natural food source.”
Larval fish exposed to microplastics also became lethargic, spent more time in a motionless state and swam shorter distances across their aquarium.
One way baby perch survive their vulnerable youth is by smelling predators. Much like stinky gym socks, predators exude repulsive scents that the baby fish can sniff and avoid. When the team squirted drops of these chemical alarms into the tanks, they found fish with microplastics were less likely to flee. The microplastics impaired the perch’s olfactory reflexes.There could be two potential reasons for this. Either the plastic particles exude toxic chemicals that interfere with nerve development, effectively altering their behaviors and olfactory responses,” Lönnstedt said. “Alternatively, the fish are lacking so much energy, due to plastic-filled stomachs, that they simply have no energy…and consequently ignore the chemical threat cues of predators.” This dampened fear response translated into real-world doom. In a separate experiment, the team added a perch predator — Northern pike (Esox lucius) and then monitored survival for 24 hours. Without microplastics, 46 percent of baby perch survived the night. Average microplastic levels cut 24-hour survival by another 20 percent. None survived against predators with high levels of microplastics.
Perch may not be suffering alone. Since completing this study, Lönnstedt and her colleagues have recorded similar (unpublished) patterns in other species of larval fish, both tropical (coral reef damselfish) and temperate (pike and flounder).
“In this way, the plastic contaminants are transferred from the small prey fish to the larger predatory pike and are likely to bioaccumulate in the food chain,” Lönnstedt said. “If this process takes place in the marine ecosystem, plastics can affect the health of food webs, which include humans as an apex predator.”
“Now we know that polystyrene is harmful, but we also need to compare it to the other common polymers such as polyethylene and PVC,” Lönnstedt said. “If we can target the chemical that is most harmful, at least this could hopefully be phased out of production.”