|
Yanks for
Stalin
Interview Transcript
Stephen
Kotkin (cont)
This
can be achieved only one way, by the borrowing, or, the purchase
of technology and know how from the Capitalists. So, why would
the Capitalist sell all their best stuff to something which they
are in part afraid and which is an admitted dictatorship, because
the Bolsheviks never claimed to be anything but a dictatorship.
The reason is because in 1929 the stock market experienced difficulties,
bank problems, and there weren't very many people in the advanced
countries who were buying, or building, new steel plants, or chemical
plants or aviation factories and large firms like General Electric
exist not because they support one political system or another,
but because they need to satisfy their shareholders and they have
a bottom line, which they watch. So, here was one very big
customer at a time when the rest of the world was under pressure.
They were so willing to sell whatever they had, that they were
tripping over themselves to get into Moscow and to talk with the
Bolsheviks. People who they may claim to be godless, Communist,
to be feared, to be hated, but also potentially paying in gold
rubals, that is to say convertible rubals, before technology.
The list of Capitalist firms which built Stalin's industrialized
Soviet Union is a who's who of the most famous and advanced Capitalist
firms of the 20th Century. It includes not only American
ones, but Italians and Germans, etceteras. Later on they
would be embarrassed by this collaboration and remove this episode
from their company histories, which were produced in the Cold
War period after 1945. But, at the time, they were competing
with each other for a stake of Stalin's industrialization
of Soviet industrial program. Now, could the Soviets
had done it without this? Well, they would have been able
to industrialize more slowly. They would have been able
to industrialize with perhaps less advanced technology.
They would have, perhaps, not have had the same kinds of tank
factories, submarines, turbines and oil refineries, all the other
technology which they purchased. They would have been able
to do something, but not at the same level, or speed, as a result
of the collaboration of the Capitalists. Now, what did the
Capitalist get out of this? Did it work for them?
Were they able to sell their technology, make a profit, etceteras?
The answer is a mixed picture because the firms would sell, for
example, a steel plant, or the technology for blast furnaces,
cold world steel mills and finished product steel making, for
example to make railroad....to make rails. So, they (break)
Q.
Tell me about it.....
A.
How did the Capitalist do in this deal, in their business dealings
with the Soviet government? The answer is a very mixed picture.
If they would sell , for example, an entire steel plant from the
blast furnaces all the way through to the finished rolled steel
and the rails that were produced, it was often the case that the
Soviets would pay only for one plant. Then, they would take
the drawings and the technology, which was for that one plant,
and reproduce it somewhere else, having paid only for one.
So, they would get three or four or five steel plants for the
price of one. This was, of course, a violation of their
contracts, but the firms weren't selling to anybody else.
Moreover, the American firm was afraid the German firm would get
the contract and the Soviets were playing off one Capitalist firm
against another. So, they had to look the other way when
there was this kind of violation of the contract of reproducing
the drawings for factories in other places that hadn't been properly
paid for. This was true of all the industry. Many
of the companies, moreover, weren't paid in full. The Soviets
would agree to a certain amount to pay and then they would pay
only a partial amount of that and there would be negotiations
that would drag on for quite a while, when they were going to
pay the rest. In many cases, they didn't pay in full.
Contracts were abrogated unilaterally in some cases by the Soviet
side, but, nonetheless, the Capitalist firms didn't have anywhere
else to go, and , moreover, it was profitable for them because
many of the ones who had their contracts violated, who weren't
paid in full, who had their technology reproduced elsewhere without
it being paid for, continued to seek contracts with the Soviet
government right through the 1930's. So, the answer is,
it was a mutually beneficial collaboration even though they spoke
different languages and they didn't really understand business
in the same way. The technology was transferred, the Soviets
definitely benefited, the Capitalists firmed evidently benefited
otherwise they would not have been in the business in the first
place because they were there only for profit motives. The
picture that emerges is one that seems to be a successful economic
model. Here you have a peasant country which is approximately
80% peasant, which has a little bit of industry only in a few
places, mostly in Moscow and in St. Petersburg, the two main capitals,
which is heavily reliant on foreign capital for industrialization
before the revolution and which cannot produce all the strategic
goods for its main industries, especially for it's navy and its
army. From that picture, further technology transfer with the
Capitalists firms, you get a virtually self-sufficient, heavily
industrialized economy , admittedly it is extremely wasteful,
admittedly the consumption of raw materials and energy,
the amount of workers employed is much greater than any Capitalist
firm would tolerate. On the other hand, ten years, fifteen
years prior, they didn't have any of this technology. They
were reliant on the Capitalist not only for not only capital,
but the technology. Now, they have it of their own and,
moreover, they could take it and refine it, reproduce it and use
it for purposes other than what they paid for and so the technology
transfer cannot be over estimated in its importance for the Soviet
Union. But, I must emphasize that the Capitalists went in
there voluntarily and they stayed in there even when they were
mistreated.
1
| 2
| 3
| 4
| 5
| 6
| 7
| 8
| 9
| 10
|