Go
Get Adobe Flash player
You need Flash Player 9 and javascript enabled to see the content of this site.

Can Animals Predict Disaster?
Introduction

An elephant trumpets wildly, breaks a chain holding it to a tree, and flees to higher ground — just before a massive tsunami crashes ashore, drowning hundreds of thousands of people.

Did the elephant know the deadly wave was coming?

That’s the question explored by NATURE’s Can Animals Predict Disaster?

In interviews with scientists and eyewitnesses, NATURE probes the evidence that some animals may have senses that allow them to predict impending natural disasters long before we can.

Some creatures, for instance, may be able to “hear” infrasound, — sounds produced by natural phenomena, including earthquakes, volcanoes, and storms, that are inaudible to the human ear. This ability may give elephants and other animals enough time to react and flee to safety.

Another explanation may lie in animals’ sensitivities to electromagnetic field variations. Quantum geophysicist Motoji Ikeya has found that certain animals react to changes in electrical currents. He now regularly monitors a catfish, the most sensitive of the creatures he has tested, to aid him in warning others of coming disaster.

Follow NATURE as it reexamines ancient ideas about how animals can predict disaster which are now gaining credence in scientific circles.

To order a copy of Can Animals Predict Disaster?, visit the NATURE Shop.

Online content for Can Animals Predict Disaster? was originally posted November 2005.

(35 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...
15 Responses to “Introduction”
  1. Tim Little says:

    This was dreadful. The science, for lack of a better term, was prosaic and irrelevant. No body of scientists dismiss animal perception as superior to the sensory perceptions of those in the other classes of animals.

    What these “researchers” have demonstrated is animals can detect just those stimuli that scientists can track with electronic equipment.

    The show ignored the question “are animal observations superior or more accurate than scientific equipment”.

    The ONLY item where actual science was used was in tracking the elephant during the tsunami where the elephant was clearly oblivious to the entire event.

    There was also no objective examination of the lack of animal corpses.

    Will there be a follow-up done by skeptical “evidence-based” scientists?

  2. Chip McCloskey says:

    I was completely appalled at the elephant that was shown wearing 3 feet of chain around his/her feet. This should be investigated as animal cruelty. Please tell me you didnt just film this and walk away allowing the horrific condition obviously shown in your show.

  3. pedram says:

    how animals can predict earthquake

  4. Danny M Reed says:

    At a resonant frequency of 18 to 19 hertz human vision is interrupted.

  5. Samantha says:

    thise is cool!!!!!!!!

  6. kayla s says:

    thats so cool that something could be so smart

  7. sharice says:

    [ eye really think that thats c00l i never knew that a animal could be so smart it's like if their smarter than me or any person!!!]

  8. rite rice says:

    i think this freakin stuff is kool

  9. Claryy says:

    yOo How ya Dead SeriOus Believe Thiss ?? WOW !!! ya Beinqq Lied oO2

  10. rite rice says:

    this is coOl

  11. nasiaboo says:

    hd

  12. reese babe says:

    [this is really really cool and cats rock!!!!!]

  13. deffdgr says:

    xsdgb

  14. jorge says:

    i think this is good question that it was answer

Leave a Reply

Please note that the THIRTEEN editorial staff reserves the right to not post comments it deems to be inappropriate and/or malicious in nature, as well as edit comments for length, clarity and fairness. No solicitations or advertisements will be allowed. Users may link to other Web sites relevant to discussion, but most often links to commercial Web sites will not be permitted.

Produced by THIRTEEN    ©2010 Educational Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved.