



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mormons and Proposition 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/</link>
	<description>An online companion to the weekly television news program</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:20:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Pinnegar</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-3008</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Pinnegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-3008</guid>
		<description>This is my comment and not Hatchco. Let&#039;s take this out of Judges hand and put it in the power of the people. Let the American people as a whole vote on this and let it be done with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my comment and not Hatchco. Let&#8217;s take this out of Judges hand and put it in the power of the people. Let the American people as a whole vote on this and let it be done with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-2359</guid>
		<description>The church has stated that it simply is excercising it&#039;s &quot;freedom of speech&quot;. But, as a tax exempt non-profit organization, where does &quot;freedom of speech&quot; for an organized relgious group end and &quot;separation of church and state&quot; begin? 

I&#039;m shocked and saddened that the very liberties my great- great- great grandfathers sacrificed for here in America (the leader of the French Hugenot Party is my grandfather) are being threatened back to the days when the Catholic church WAS the law in Europe, and the Church of England was it&#039;s only opposition. 

Is there any wonder the true Gospel was restored in a land not yet perverted by the lack of separation of church and state? 

Then why would the LDS faith, which I dearly love, and which was horrifically persecuted by early Americans for their marriage beliefs (plural marriage), and for their very religious rights (they were oftentimes driven from County to County, State to State, a hated people) ever dream of touching the Political process or of ever judging, condemning, or dividing those who have a different belief in marriage than they do?

I only ask everyone in Utah this one question: What is the highest suicide rate in your State? Answer: It&#039;s among gay Mormon men because the Church would rather them just &quot;go away&quot; than be organized and accepted. Is the Church committing murder with the sword of indifference? 

A church that has taken liberties with marriage (multiple plural marriages) will never have a right to take those same liberties from others, ever, unless they opt to marry once again, &quot;Church and State&quot; in a very dangerous hypocritical, polygamous union taking us all back to the days when &quot;Bloody Mary&quot; (I bet most Mormons don&#039;t even know the story) actually carried out violence in order to force the Catholic prayer coda. 

And, truly, do believing members REALLY have a voice in this?! Ha! 

The Church professses to want freedom of speech but it&#039;s members are clearly denied it and made to feel that they are not &quot;worthy&quot; or &quot;believing&quot; enough and that they are being separated as wheat and chaff for the Last Days.

I&#039;m shocked at how often sisters in the above documentary have been attacked on this website. I have yet to read an intelligent response from the angry &quot;Armies of Helaman&quot; who feel the need to defend the Churches stealth involvement in the Political process, while completely ignoring what is happening to children all over the world who would love to be adopted by a clean, trustworthy, loving gay family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The church has stated that it simply is excercising it&#8217;s &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221;. But, as a tax exempt non-profit organization, where does &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221; for an organized relgious group end and &#8220;separation of church and state&#8221; begin? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m shocked and saddened that the very liberties my great- great- great grandfathers sacrificed for here in America (the leader of the French Hugenot Party is my grandfather) are being threatened back to the days when the Catholic church WAS the law in Europe, and the Church of England was it&#8217;s only opposition. </p>
<p>Is there any wonder the true Gospel was restored in a land not yet perverted by the lack of separation of church and state? </p>
<p>Then why would the LDS faith, which I dearly love, and which was horrifically persecuted by early Americans for their marriage beliefs (plural marriage), and for their very religious rights (they were oftentimes driven from County to County, State to State, a hated people) ever dream of touching the Political process or of ever judging, condemning, or dividing those who have a different belief in marriage than they do?</p>
<p>I only ask everyone in Utah this one question: What is the highest suicide rate in your State? Answer: It&#8217;s among gay Mormon men because the Church would rather them just &#8220;go away&#8221; than be organized and accepted. Is the Church committing murder with the sword of indifference? </p>
<p>A church that has taken liberties with marriage (multiple plural marriages) will never have a right to take those same liberties from others, ever, unless they opt to marry once again, &#8220;Church and State&#8221; in a very dangerous hypocritical, polygamous union taking us all back to the days when &#8220;Bloody Mary&#8221; (I bet most Mormons don&#8217;t even know the story) actually carried out violence in order to force the Catholic prayer coda. </p>
<p>And, truly, do believing members REALLY have a voice in this?! Ha! </p>
<p>The Church professses to want freedom of speech but it&#8217;s members are clearly denied it and made to feel that they are not &#8220;worthy&#8221; or &#8220;believing&#8221; enough and that they are being separated as wheat and chaff for the Last Days.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m shocked at how often sisters in the above documentary have been attacked on this website. I have yet to read an intelligent response from the angry &#8220;Armies of Helaman&#8221; who feel the need to defend the Churches stealth involvement in the Political process, while completely ignoring what is happening to children all over the world who would love to be adopted by a clean, trustworthy, loving gay family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decker</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>Decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-2051</guid>
		<description>There are a few people here who seem to have hit the nail on the head.  Prop 8 is about the majority stating their beliefs.  The Church (LDS) is one of many that requested help from its members to support this proposition.

Homosexuality is against the revealed word of God through all time.  No one should be stating that those attractions aren&#039;t valid and real.  Promiscuous heterosexual relationships abound as well.  The Church does not condone those relationships either.  As others have stated, God loves the sinner, and despises the sin.  He wants all to come to Him, by their choice, on His terms.

The Prop 8 hysteria directed against the LDS Church, both from those who purport to be LDS and those who are adamantly not, is nothing more than religious bigotry.  The hate crimes instigated by those who attacked each other are contemptuous.  Those hate crimes seem predominantly to be started by those opposed to the Mormons and their Constitutionally upheld right to oppose same-sex marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few people here who seem to have hit the nail on the head.  Prop 8 is about the majority stating their beliefs.  The Church (LDS) is one of many that requested help from its members to support this proposition.</p>
<p>Homosexuality is against the revealed word of God through all time.  No one should be stating that those attractions aren&#8217;t valid and real.  Promiscuous heterosexual relationships abound as well.  The Church does not condone those relationships either.  As others have stated, God loves the sinner, and despises the sin.  He wants all to come to Him, by their choice, on His terms.</p>
<p>The Prop 8 hysteria directed against the LDS Church, both from those who purport to be LDS and those who are adamantly not, is nothing more than religious bigotry.  The hate crimes instigated by those who attacked each other are contemptuous.  Those hate crimes seem predominantly to be started by those opposed to the Mormons and their Constitutionally upheld right to oppose same-sex marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t you just hear echoes of the Ayatollahs and Talibans in these &quot;we know what God wants, so we&#039;re going to hijack the civil law to impose our beliefs on everyone else&quot; comments?  This pernicious mindset is contrary to the very essence of what America stands for:  the freedom of the individual to control his or her own life without government interference, so long as no direct harm is being done to other individuals.

It is truly pathetic that these holier-than-thou Pharisees lack the ability to see how outrageous their statements are.  They expect others to receive mere pronouncements of their theology grandiosely titled as &quot;Proclamation To The World&quot; and such, and they naively think it will be accepted by others as a sufficient basis to adopt viciously discriminatory laws denying the most basic rights to millions of their fellow citizens.  They feel free to denigrate people different from themselves with inane terms like &quot;lifestyle choices&quot;, always a dead giveaway of masked bigotry and prejudice.  The only &quot;lifestyle choice&quot; involved here is that of narrow-minnded religious belief, not of sexual orientation.

The decision of the Mormon Church to involve its members and their LD$ money heavily in the Proposition 8 campaign was cynically designed to curry favor with exactly those religious constituencies that continue to harbor serious reservations about their Church and its theology. 
(&quot;Hey, maybe those Mormons aren&#039;t so bad after all ... and they&#039;re just as anti-gay as we are!&quot;)
Unfortunately, they&#039;ve caused enormous damage to the previously admirable reputation of their Church for intelligence and tolerance for those who believe differently than they do (&quot;We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.&quot;  Articles of Faith)

We have no problem with the Mormons not marrying same-sex couples in their churches, just as we have no quarrel with Orthodox Jews abstaining from cheeseburgers or Jehovah&#039;s Witnesses refusing blood transfusions.  But when it comes to the equal protection of the law for all of our citizens, we don&#039;t need religious bullies trying to force others to live in conformance to their sectarian theologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t you just hear echoes of the Ayatollahs and Talibans in these &#8220;we know what God wants, so we&#8217;re going to hijack the civil law to impose our beliefs on everyone else&#8221; comments?  This pernicious mindset is contrary to the very essence of what America stands for:  the freedom of the individual to control his or her own life without government interference, so long as no direct harm is being done to other individuals.</p>
<p>It is truly pathetic that these holier-than-thou Pharisees lack the ability to see how outrageous their statements are.  They expect others to receive mere pronouncements of their theology grandiosely titled as &#8220;Proclamation To The World&#8221; and such, and they naively think it will be accepted by others as a sufficient basis to adopt viciously discriminatory laws denying the most basic rights to millions of their fellow citizens.  They feel free to denigrate people different from themselves with inane terms like &#8220;lifestyle choices&#8221;, always a dead giveaway of masked bigotry and prejudice.  The only &#8220;lifestyle choice&#8221; involved here is that of narrow-minnded religious belief, not of sexual orientation.</p>
<p>The decision of the Mormon Church to involve its members and their LD$ money heavily in the Proposition 8 campaign was cynically designed to curry favor with exactly those religious constituencies that continue to harbor serious reservations about their Church and its theology.<br />
(&#8221;Hey, maybe those Mormons aren&#8217;t so bad after all &#8230; and they&#8217;re just as anti-gay as we are!&#8221;)<br />
Unfortunately, they&#8217;ve caused enormous damage to the previously admirable reputation of their Church for intelligence and tolerance for those who believe differently than they do (&#8221;We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.&#8221;  Articles of Faith)</p>
<p>We have no problem with the Mormons not marrying same-sex couples in their churches, just as we have no quarrel with Orthodox Jews abstaining from cheeseburgers or Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses refusing blood transfusions.  But when it comes to the equal protection of the law for all of our citizens, we don&#8217;t need religious bullies trying to force others to live in conformance to their sectarian theologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twall</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Twall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 21:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>I think what Kim McCall meant was that Brigham Young was opposed to the constitution on the United States.  He just made a mistake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what Kim McCall meant was that Brigham Young was opposed to the constitution on the United States.  He just made a mistake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ Lumberjack</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ Lumberjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>I cannot believe what the Mormon Church did here.  I&#039;m from Arizona, where aside from Utah, our state founding pretty much was the Mormons, and had a huge influence.  And we prospered from this.

The problem is, that this Prop 8 has gone nationwide.  People in states far away from any Mormons now know about the Mormons, or at least they think they do, and certainly have an opinion.  And unlike me, who grew up in Arizona, and lived next to Mormons, the rest of the country will always remember you guys for Prop 8.  When the country thinks of Mormons, they will think of Prop 8.

That group that denied gays the right to marry because it was too much a burden on your moral conscience.  I would think that since the Mormons have gone through hell in this country with discrimination and being kicked out from one place to the other, maybe they would have some sympathy for a group that was just simply wanting to marry.  I guess not so.

You guys have taken a huge step back in regards to acceptance.  I live in AZ, so I know you guys are cool.  The rest of the country, not so much.  Most of the self proclaimed Christians in this country doesn&#039;t even believe you&#039;re Christians.  

Prop 8 will live with you guys for a long time.  You will be known first and foremost as &quot;that group that hates gays&quot;.  You&#039;ll have to live with that.  As you paid for it, and championed for it.

One step forward, two steps back.  No wonder your missionaries are getting the cold shoulder.  People think when they open the door to Elder Right or Elder Wrong, it&#039;s gonna be about gay marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot believe what the Mormon Church did here.  I&#8217;m from Arizona, where aside from Utah, our state founding pretty much was the Mormons, and had a huge influence.  And we prospered from this.</p>
<p>The problem is, that this Prop 8 has gone nationwide.  People in states far away from any Mormons now know about the Mormons, or at least they think they do, and certainly have an opinion.  And unlike me, who grew up in Arizona, and lived next to Mormons, the rest of the country will always remember you guys for Prop 8.  When the country thinks of Mormons, they will think of Prop 8.</p>
<p>That group that denied gays the right to marry because it was too much a burden on your moral conscience.  I would think that since the Mormons have gone through hell in this country with discrimination and being kicked out from one place to the other, maybe they would have some sympathy for a group that was just simply wanting to marry.  I guess not so.</p>
<p>You guys have taken a huge step back in regards to acceptance.  I live in AZ, so I know you guys are cool.  The rest of the country, not so much.  Most of the self proclaimed Christians in this country doesn&#8217;t even believe you&#8217;re Christians.  </p>
<p>Prop 8 will live with you guys for a long time.  You will be known first and foremost as &#8220;that group that hates gays&#8221;.  You&#8217;ll have to live with that.  As you paid for it, and championed for it.</p>
<p>One step forward, two steps back.  No wonder your missionaries are getting the cold shoulder.  People think when they open the door to Elder Right or Elder Wrong, it&#8217;s gonna be about gay marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>The LDS view on Prop 8 is not logical nor is it moral.  The people that are wanting to be treated equally are not being treated fairly and the LDS Curch is doing this for the publicity and converts they may gain from it.  How can the sanctity of marriage be degraided when people who are gay or lesbian or even supporting it will not be allowed into the Temple anyhow to be sealed.  
People have the right to be treated fairly and with rspect.  I grew up in the segregation of the old South and remember how that process of change came about.  People stood on the corners carrying signs protesting integration.  They now look like blithering fools.
  The LDS Church looks no less foolish and their intentions are obvious.  They want the members.  This is nothing more than a ploy for numbers.  Nothing else comes to any organisation other than larger numbers and, ...money.  To attempt to put down a whole segment of society due to your incapabilities towards them is wrong.  Christ forgave the guy in the cross, you would put them up there and drive the nails into their hands yourself.  People can see whatyou are doin.  Your members are quitting over it, your converts are dropping due to your christlike actions.  anyone that would join a Church over politics...well, the church and that person deserve each other.

Don, in Las Vegas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LDS view on Prop 8 is not logical nor is it moral.  The people that are wanting to be treated equally are not being treated fairly and the LDS Curch is doing this for the publicity and converts they may gain from it.  How can the sanctity of marriage be degraided when people who are gay or lesbian or even supporting it will not be allowed into the Temple anyhow to be sealed.<br />
People have the right to be treated fairly and with rspect.  I grew up in the segregation of the old South and remember how that process of change came about.  People stood on the corners carrying signs protesting integration.  They now look like blithering fools.<br />
  The LDS Church looks no less foolish and their intentions are obvious.  They want the members.  This is nothing more than a ploy for numbers.  Nothing else comes to any organisation other than larger numbers and, &#8230;money.  To attempt to put down a whole segment of society due to your incapabilities towards them is wrong.  Christ forgave the guy in the cross, you would put them up there and drive the nails into their hands yourself.  People can see whatyou are doin.  Your members are quitting over it, your converts are dropping due to your christlike actions.  anyone that would join a Church over politics&#8230;well, the church and that person deserve each other.</p>
<p>Don, in Las Vegas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boo in Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>Boo in Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>Bob #61 claims that &quot;former&quot; Bishops of the Mormon Church should not identify themselves as such because it misleads, and, to him, it identifies the perpetrator as an &quot;imposter.&quot; 

Bob is free to make whatever judgments he will, but if knows his church teachings well he implies, he should know that once one is ordained a bishop, one REMAINS a bishop permanently.  The &quot;former&quot; description suggests only that, for now, the Bishop does not have responsibility for a particular congregation. 

Incidentally, &quot;our lay church&quot; is a phrase I&#039;ve never heard before and I am a current life-long member with roots dating back to the earliest days of the church.  

However, one&#039;s former position does indeed mean something.  

Years ago I considered taking a fairly a high-level position with a church-owned corporation. Part of the vetting process included interviews with several apostles, including the current President of the Church, Thomas S. Monson. During our conversation he noted that all of the senior officers of this particular organization were &quot;former or current Stake Presidents and Bishops.&quot;  This was particularly memorable to me because, at the time, I had not previously served in either capacity. 

Obviously, ones &quot;former&quot; callings means something to President Monson and other leaders of the church.  And, I think they mean something to most other people on the planet.  Except Bob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob #61 claims that &#8220;former&#8221; Bishops of the Mormon Church should not identify themselves as such because it misleads, and, to him, it identifies the perpetrator as an &#8220;imposter.&#8221; </p>
<p>Bob is free to make whatever judgments he will, but if knows his church teachings well he implies, he should know that once one is ordained a bishop, one REMAINS a bishop permanently.  The &#8220;former&#8221; description suggests only that, for now, the Bishop does not have responsibility for a particular congregation. </p>
<p>Incidentally, &#8220;our lay church&#8221; is a phrase I&#8217;ve never heard before and I am a current life-long member with roots dating back to the earliest days of the church.  </p>
<p>However, one&#8217;s former position does indeed mean something.  </p>
<p>Years ago I considered taking a fairly a high-level position with a church-owned corporation. Part of the vetting process included interviews with several apostles, including the current President of the Church, Thomas S. Monson. During our conversation he noted that all of the senior officers of this particular organization were &#8220;former or current Stake Presidents and Bishops.&#8221;  This was particularly memorable to me because, at the time, I had not previously served in either capacity. </p>
<p>Obviously, ones &#8220;former&#8221; callings means something to President Monson and other leaders of the church.  And, I think they mean something to most other people on the planet.  Except Bob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>This is such a no brainer to me.  As a member of the church if you understand the doctrine and the emphasis on families you can understand the strong urge from the leadership to the members to actively fight for marriage.  We believe a marriage is ordained of God. And is between a man and a woman for the sole purpose to bring his children in the world.  Most people understand that takes two of the opposite sex. Now our church usually never gets involved in politics unless it is something that our church is strongly opposed of. This is one of those things. End of story. Our church is based on the belief in a living prophet who speaks on behalf of God. If you really believe that, then you believe that since the prophet has spoken it God has spoken it. Can anyone really dispute God? It sounds like the problem is the faith that the prophet actually speaks for God.  If you can&#039;t believe that, then maybe this isn&#039;t the right faith for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a no brainer to me.  As a member of the church if you understand the doctrine and the emphasis on families you can understand the strong urge from the leadership to the members to actively fight for marriage.  We believe a marriage is ordained of God. And is between a man and a woman for the sole purpose to bring his children in the world.  Most people understand that takes two of the opposite sex. Now our church usually never gets involved in politics unless it is something that our church is strongly opposed of. This is one of those things. End of story. Our church is based on the belief in a living prophet who speaks on behalf of God. If you really believe that, then you believe that since the prophet has spoken it God has spoken it. Can anyone really dispute God? It sounds like the problem is the faith that the prophet actually speaks for God.  If you can&#8217;t believe that, then maybe this isn&#8217;t the right faith for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/episodes/may-22-2009/mormons-and-proposition-8/3019/comment-page-2/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/?p=3019#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>One request:  Please do not refer to yourself as a &quot;former Mormon Bishop&quot; or &quot;active member&quot;.  Doing so appears to insinuate that you have a broader understanding of the Gospel, or that you have special credibility.  Our Lay church teaches exactly the opposite.  Your &quot;former position&quot; means nothing.  What claiming this status really does to those of us who know our religion is reveal you as an imposter, or at least someone with no credibility as you never really understood our beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One request:  Please do not refer to yourself as a &#8220;former Mormon Bishop&#8221; or &#8220;active member&#8221;.  Doing so appears to insinuate that you have a broader understanding of the Gospel, or that you have special credibility.  Our Lay church teaches exactly the opposite.  Your &#8220;former position&#8221; means nothing.  What claiming this status really does to those of us who know our religion is reveal you as an imposter, or at least someone with no credibility as you never really understood our beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
