Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else.
Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm.
Summer Ballentine, Associated Press
Summer Ballentine, Associated Press
COLUMBIA, Mo. (AP) — Missouri voters were deciding Tuesday whether to expand Medicaid health care coverage to thousands more low-income adults after years of resistance from Republican lawmakers.
The vote on health care, as well as primaries for statewide offices and congressional seats, comes as confirmed coronavirus cases have been increasing in Missouri.
Election officials in Missouri’s largest cities, Kansas City and St. Louis, said voter turnout was steady Tuesday, though each had about a couple of dozen workers who were no-shows when the polls opened. They attributed that partly to coronavirus concerns but said substitutes were quickly dispatched.
Missouri’s Republican-led Legislature has repeatedly rejected Medicaid expansion proposals over the past decade, prompting supporters to turn to the initiative process.
Idaho, Maine, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Utah have all expanded Medicaid through ballot questions following inaction by state lawmakers, according to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. Oklahoma became the 37th state to expand eligibility for Medicaid under the federal law last month.
Missouri’s Medicaid program currently does not cover most adults without children, and its income eligibility threshold for parents is one of the lowest in the nation at about one-fifth of the poverty level.
READ MORE: How laid-off Americans may ‘fall through the cracks’ of the health care system during COVID-19
Jim Roberts, 62, an employee in the Clay County Prosecutor’s office in Liberty, was among those who voted for Medicaid expansion Tuesday. He said it is important to consider the needs of others, particularly when so many have health concerns because of the pandemic or insurance worries due to the economic downturn.
“I believe the economy is going to bounce back strongly but not anytime soon,” Roberts said. “Jesus said ‘The poor will be with you always,’ but we still need to address the concerns of those who are less fortunate.”
Bonnie Ciro, 73, a hairdresser in Liberty, said she voted against the proposal because she doesn’t trust politicians to use the money, and she doesn’t want to pay higher taxes.
“It’s too much money,” Ciro said. “I think it’s a scam, I don’t trust what they say. (Politicians) tell you one thing and then do another thing with these kinds of programs.”
The ballot proposal would expand eligibility under the terms of the 2010 federal health care law signed by President Barack Obama. That law provides a higher-than-usual federal funding share for states that expand Medicaid coverage to adults earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level, about $17,600 for an individual or $30,000 for a family of three.
Democratic Auditor Nicole Galloway’s office estimated that expanding Medicaid could cost the state at least $200 million or save as much as $1 billion annually by 2026. Republican opponents cite the potential costs as reason to oppose the ballot initiative.
“Amendment 2 will be a knockout blow to the state budget as more services will be cut or eliminated to pay for the health care of able-bodied adults,” state House Budget Chairman Cody Smith said.
By proposing a constitutional amendment instead of a new law, Missouri supporters have ensured that lawmakers will be unable to change it without going back to voters.
WATCH: Pandemic intensifies universal health care conversation
Backers include the Missouri Hospital Association and groups with particular sway over Republicans, such as the Missouri Catholic Conference and Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
Republican Gov. Mike Parson, who opposes Medicaid expansion and is up for election this year, in May moved the vote on the proposal up from the Nov. 3 general election to Tuesday’s primary. Parson said the earlier vote will give the state more time to financially prepare for Medicaid expansion, if it passes. He said his decision was not about politics.
Galloway is trying to unseat Parson. Her campaign has said Parson switched the day of the vote on Medicaid because fewer people typically vote in August compared to November, possibly giving opponents a better chance of defeating the measure.
Voter turnout during the 2016 presidential general election in Missouri was almost three times higher than turnout for that year’s August primary. Even in 2018, a record year for turnout during a primary, roughly 1 million more voters turned up at the polls in November compared to August.
Local election authorities have projected a statewide voter turnout of nearly 37% Tuesday.
Voters on Tuesday also will pick the Republican and Democratic candidates for Congress, the Missouri governor’s seat and other statewide offices, and state legislative seats.
Parson and Galloway have primary opponents, but both are expected to be nominated by their respective political parties.
St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, whose job performance has been lauded by some civil rights activists and criticized by President Donald Trump and other leading Republicans, faces a challenge from former homicide prosecutor Mary Pat Carl.
Associated Press writers Margaret Stafford in Liberty, Missouri, and David A. Lieb in Jefferson City, Missouri, contributed to this report.
Support Provided By:
Additional Support Provided By: