By — PBS News Hour PBS News Hour Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/science-jan-june09-satellite_02-12 Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter More Satellite Collisions Could Occur, Experts Say Science Feb 12, 2009 2:35 PM EDT Tuesday’s unprecedented crash involved a privately owned U.S. communications satellite and a defunct Russian military satellite. While the hundreds of new speeding bits of space junk could threaten the manned International Space Station and other satellites, the geopolitical fallout could be even greater, according to some experts. “This is an event that really makes us realize that things are not so straightforward as we originally thought,” Francisco Diego, a senior research fellow in physics and astronomy at University College London, told Reuters. “I couldn’t put a number on the probability of this happening again, but now that it has happened, it changes things a lot and it becomes a concern.” In a statement Thursday, Bethesda, Md.-based communications group Iridium denied that it was responsible for the crash over Siberia. The collision scattered space debris in orbits 300 to 800 miles above Earth, according to Maj. Gen. Alexander Yakushin, chief of staff for the Russian military’s Space Forces. Iridium said it planned to move one of its in-orbit spare satellites into the constellation to replace the lost craft within 30 days. The collision occurred at roughly 485 miles above the planet, an altitude used by satellites that monitor weather and carry telephone communications among other things, Air Force Col. Les Kodlick of the U.S. Strategic Command said. The International Space Station flies at a lower altitude and is the command’s top priority in attempting to prevent collisions. “If you want a global coverage with high resolution, this is where you go,” said Bo Andersen, director general of the Norwegian Space Agency, referring to the altitude. “If you go much further down, you get more drag from the atmosphere which shortens the life of the satellite; if you go higher up, the resolution gets worse,” he said. The collision happened not far from the orbit of a defunct weather satellite blown up by a ground-based missile in a Chinese weapons test in 2007. European and U.S. officials argue the resulting debris made it harder to identify crash risks. Scientists say predicting collisions is difficult because of the unpredictable behavior of other objects, solar radiation and the gravitational effect of the moon and Earth, while molecular wisps of atmosphere can gently skew orbits. “You can calculate potential collisions some time in advance but orbits change, especially when you have a defunct satellite which you cannot correct,” Andersen said. The Russian satellite lacked a propulsion system and could not have been nudged out of the way. It was not immediately clear if Iridium, which owned the U.S. satellite, tried to avoid the collision or had an early warning about what space officials call a “close conjunction.” Igor Lisov, a prominent Russian space expert, said Thursday he did not understand why NASA’s debris experts and Iridium had failed to prevent the collision, since the Iridium satellite was active and its orbit could be adjusted. “It could have been a computer failure or a human error,” he said, according to the Associated Press. “It also could be that they only were paying attention to smaller debris and ignoring the defunct satellites.” Both the U.S. Space Surveillance Network and Russian Space Forces are tracking the debris, believed to be traveling at speeds of around 660 feet per second. NASA said it would take weeks to know the full magnitude of the crash, but both NASA and Russia’s Roscosmos agencies said there was little risk to the International Space Station and its three crew members. Russian Mission Control spokesman Valery Lyndin noted the station’s orbit has been adjusted in the past to dodge space debris. Among the 18,000-plus objects being tracked in space by the U.S. Strategic Command are operational and defunct satellites, spent rocket boosters and debris that is 3.9 inches in diameter or larger. Nicholas Johnson, an orbital expert at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, said it was uncertain how much new debris had been created by the crash. “It takes a while for the debris to spread out and for us to get an accurate head count,” he said. NASA contracts with the Department of Defense for orbital tracking services and regularly maneuvers its spacecraft to avoid any crashes. U.S. officials said the space junk posed no threat to the space shuttle set to launch Feb. 22 with seven astronauts, though they planned to review the issue. The Iridium orbiter weighed 1,235 pounds and the decommissioned Kosmos-2251 military communications craft weighed nearly a ton. The Kosmos was launched in 1993 and went out of service two years later in 1995, Yakushin said. Some Soviet-built, nuclear-powered satellites long out of action in higher orbits may also be vulnerable to collisions, Lisov said. If one of them collides with the debris, the radioactive fallout would pose no threat to Earth, Lisov said, but its speeding wreckage could multiply the hazard to other satellites. European space scientists said they were aware of the potential for a close encounter between Russian and U.S. satellites before they crashed, but the difficulty of predicting orbits and “noise” from thousands of pieces of debris made a definitive prediction of a collision impossible. “The ‘catalog’ of objects and debris showed a possible approach between the paths of the two satellites but an approach doesn’t necessarily mean a collision, and you would need more information to be certain,” Philippe Goudy, deputy director of the French space operations control centre at Toulouse, told Reuters. Some satellites fly within a few hundred meters of each other every day, Johnson told Space.com. Each year, there are about six instances in which old satellites and satellite parts break apart in what scientists call “fragmentation events.” Satellite components or spent rocket stages have accidentally collided three times before in the last 20 years. “This is the first time we’ve had two intact spacecraft collide, so it is a big deal,” he said. “But you know, it’s not unexpected.” We're not going anywhere. Stand up for truly independent, trusted news that you can count on! Donate now By — PBS News Hour PBS News Hour
Tuesday’s unprecedented crash involved a privately owned U.S. communications satellite and a defunct Russian military satellite. While the hundreds of new speeding bits of space junk could threaten the manned International Space Station and other satellites, the geopolitical fallout could be even greater, according to some experts. “This is an event that really makes us realize that things are not so straightforward as we originally thought,” Francisco Diego, a senior research fellow in physics and astronomy at University College London, told Reuters. “I couldn’t put a number on the probability of this happening again, but now that it has happened, it changes things a lot and it becomes a concern.” In a statement Thursday, Bethesda, Md.-based communications group Iridium denied that it was responsible for the crash over Siberia. The collision scattered space debris in orbits 300 to 800 miles above Earth, according to Maj. Gen. Alexander Yakushin, chief of staff for the Russian military’s Space Forces. Iridium said it planned to move one of its in-orbit spare satellites into the constellation to replace the lost craft within 30 days. The collision occurred at roughly 485 miles above the planet, an altitude used by satellites that monitor weather and carry telephone communications among other things, Air Force Col. Les Kodlick of the U.S. Strategic Command said. The International Space Station flies at a lower altitude and is the command’s top priority in attempting to prevent collisions. “If you want a global coverage with high resolution, this is where you go,” said Bo Andersen, director general of the Norwegian Space Agency, referring to the altitude. “If you go much further down, you get more drag from the atmosphere which shortens the life of the satellite; if you go higher up, the resolution gets worse,” he said. The collision happened not far from the orbit of a defunct weather satellite blown up by a ground-based missile in a Chinese weapons test in 2007. European and U.S. officials argue the resulting debris made it harder to identify crash risks. Scientists say predicting collisions is difficult because of the unpredictable behavior of other objects, solar radiation and the gravitational effect of the moon and Earth, while molecular wisps of atmosphere can gently skew orbits. “You can calculate potential collisions some time in advance but orbits change, especially when you have a defunct satellite which you cannot correct,” Andersen said. The Russian satellite lacked a propulsion system and could not have been nudged out of the way. It was not immediately clear if Iridium, which owned the U.S. satellite, tried to avoid the collision or had an early warning about what space officials call a “close conjunction.” Igor Lisov, a prominent Russian space expert, said Thursday he did not understand why NASA’s debris experts and Iridium had failed to prevent the collision, since the Iridium satellite was active and its orbit could be adjusted. “It could have been a computer failure or a human error,” he said, according to the Associated Press. “It also could be that they only were paying attention to smaller debris and ignoring the defunct satellites.” Both the U.S. Space Surveillance Network and Russian Space Forces are tracking the debris, believed to be traveling at speeds of around 660 feet per second. NASA said it would take weeks to know the full magnitude of the crash, but both NASA and Russia’s Roscosmos agencies said there was little risk to the International Space Station and its three crew members. Russian Mission Control spokesman Valery Lyndin noted the station’s orbit has been adjusted in the past to dodge space debris. Among the 18,000-plus objects being tracked in space by the U.S. Strategic Command are operational and defunct satellites, spent rocket boosters and debris that is 3.9 inches in diameter or larger. Nicholas Johnson, an orbital expert at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, said it was uncertain how much new debris had been created by the crash. “It takes a while for the debris to spread out and for us to get an accurate head count,” he said. NASA contracts with the Department of Defense for orbital tracking services and regularly maneuvers its spacecraft to avoid any crashes. U.S. officials said the space junk posed no threat to the space shuttle set to launch Feb. 22 with seven astronauts, though they planned to review the issue. The Iridium orbiter weighed 1,235 pounds and the decommissioned Kosmos-2251 military communications craft weighed nearly a ton. The Kosmos was launched in 1993 and went out of service two years later in 1995, Yakushin said. Some Soviet-built, nuclear-powered satellites long out of action in higher orbits may also be vulnerable to collisions, Lisov said. If one of them collides with the debris, the radioactive fallout would pose no threat to Earth, Lisov said, but its speeding wreckage could multiply the hazard to other satellites. European space scientists said they were aware of the potential for a close encounter between Russian and U.S. satellites before they crashed, but the difficulty of predicting orbits and “noise” from thousands of pieces of debris made a definitive prediction of a collision impossible. “The ‘catalog’ of objects and debris showed a possible approach between the paths of the two satellites but an approach doesn’t necessarily mean a collision, and you would need more information to be certain,” Philippe Goudy, deputy director of the French space operations control centre at Toulouse, told Reuters. Some satellites fly within a few hundred meters of each other every day, Johnson told Space.com. Each year, there are about six instances in which old satellites and satellite parts break apart in what scientists call “fragmentation events.” Satellite components or spent rocket stages have accidentally collided three times before in the last 20 years. “This is the first time we’ve had two intact spacecraft collide, so it is a big deal,” he said. “But you know, it’s not unexpected.” We're not going anywhere. Stand up for truly independent, trusted news that you can count on! Donate now