By — PBS News Hour PBS News Hour Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/international-jan-june09-iaea_03-27 Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter IAEA Members Hit Stalemate on New Leadership World Mar 27, 2009 4:10 PM EDT The stalemate leaves the future direction of the U.N. nuclear watchdog in limbo and opens the door to new candidates who might bridge rich-poor divisions by the agency’s next meeting. Friday’s meeting of the IAEA’s 35-nation board was adjourned prematurely after neither Yukiya Amano of Japan nor Abdul Samad Minty of South Africa got a required two-thirds majority needed for victory to succeed Director General Mohamed ElBaradei. Board chairwoman Taous Feroukhi of Algeria is expected to invite member nations to submit — or resubmit — candidates within the next four weeks before a new meeting. Both Amano and Minty could try again — something the South African appeared to rule out in comments after the end of the secret balloting. Amano was generally endorsed by Western nations, who hold a majority on the board. He led throughout six rounds of voting over two days, in one instance falling short of the threshold by only a single vote. But he failed to win support with developing nations, most of whom endorsed Minty. In comments tinged with reproach, Minty suggested that Western nations had missed an opportunity to bridge differences with developing countries by failing to endorse his candidacy. “We were hopeful that those that advocated change and a relationship with the developing world based on trust and partnership would — in this important election process — have implemented these noble ideas,” he said, according to the Associated Press. “Sadly, it appears as this has only remained as good intentions.” His comments — and the clear split in the vote along political lines — reflected the deep divisions within the agency between the United States and its allies and countries critical of the West for its alleged indifference to the problems of poorer nations. The IAEA had wished to avoid a long delay installing a new chief as it confronts mounting challenges, including Iran’s disputed pursuit of nuclear technology that could yield atomic bombs and a shortage of financial means to uphold the IAEA’s anti-proliferation mandate. However, the board resorted to two runoff, “yes, no or abstain” ballots Friday for each candidate. Amano garnered 22 “yes” votes, 12 “no” with one abstention. Minty collected 15 “yes” votes, 19 “no” with one abstention. “The slate of candidates is considered to have been wiped clean,” said Ambassador Taous Feroukhi of Algeria, chairman of the Vienna-based governing board, according to Reuters. Several new contenders, including several Latin Americans, may be waiting in the wings to enter the race before the next closed-door governors’ ballot in May. A Japanese foreign ministry official told Japanese journalists Amano would reenter the race. Minty said he would have consultations with supporters before deciding what to do. Feroukhi said both Amano and Minty had strong credentials, but told Reuters: “A consensus candidate (is needed), someone who doesn’t mark out clear differences like this … between the developed and developing countries. Someone for both.” The IAEA has a politically tricky mission — to catch secret nuclear bomb programs and to coordinate global cooperation in sharing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Feroukhi planned consultations to see if a consensus might emerge for one compromise candidate, in keeping with multilateral tradition and to avoid internal IAEA divisions later. Possible nominees include: Luis Echavarri, the Spanish director of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s nuclear energy agency Rogelio Pfirter, the Argentinean head of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in The Hague and a seasoned former nuclear treaty negotiator Milenko Skoknic, Chile’s ambassador to the IAEA and Feroukhi’s predecessor as board chairman. ElBaradei, who shared the Nobel peace prize with his agency in 2005, leaves office in November after 12 years. He was recently marked by spats with the Bush administration over what he saw as its warlike approach to resolving Iran’s nuclear issue. Agency officials have said they hope a change in U.S. foreign policy under President Barack Obama might shore up efforts to prevent the stealthy spread of nuclear weapons technology. He has signaled a readiness to talk without preconditions with Iran and Syria, both subject to IAEA investigations now at an impasse, and eventually double what ElBaradei has called a “shoestring” IAEA budget not up to tackling challenges ahead. We're not going anywhere. Stand up for truly independent, trusted news that you can count on! Donate now By — PBS News Hour PBS News Hour
The stalemate leaves the future direction of the U.N. nuclear watchdog in limbo and opens the door to new candidates who might bridge rich-poor divisions by the agency’s next meeting. Friday’s meeting of the IAEA’s 35-nation board was adjourned prematurely after neither Yukiya Amano of Japan nor Abdul Samad Minty of South Africa got a required two-thirds majority needed for victory to succeed Director General Mohamed ElBaradei. Board chairwoman Taous Feroukhi of Algeria is expected to invite member nations to submit — or resubmit — candidates within the next four weeks before a new meeting. Both Amano and Minty could try again — something the South African appeared to rule out in comments after the end of the secret balloting. Amano was generally endorsed by Western nations, who hold a majority on the board. He led throughout six rounds of voting over two days, in one instance falling short of the threshold by only a single vote. But he failed to win support with developing nations, most of whom endorsed Minty. In comments tinged with reproach, Minty suggested that Western nations had missed an opportunity to bridge differences with developing countries by failing to endorse his candidacy. “We were hopeful that those that advocated change and a relationship with the developing world based on trust and partnership would — in this important election process — have implemented these noble ideas,” he said, according to the Associated Press. “Sadly, it appears as this has only remained as good intentions.” His comments — and the clear split in the vote along political lines — reflected the deep divisions within the agency between the United States and its allies and countries critical of the West for its alleged indifference to the problems of poorer nations. The IAEA had wished to avoid a long delay installing a new chief as it confronts mounting challenges, including Iran’s disputed pursuit of nuclear technology that could yield atomic bombs and a shortage of financial means to uphold the IAEA’s anti-proliferation mandate. However, the board resorted to two runoff, “yes, no or abstain” ballots Friday for each candidate. Amano garnered 22 “yes” votes, 12 “no” with one abstention. Minty collected 15 “yes” votes, 19 “no” with one abstention. “The slate of candidates is considered to have been wiped clean,” said Ambassador Taous Feroukhi of Algeria, chairman of the Vienna-based governing board, according to Reuters. Several new contenders, including several Latin Americans, may be waiting in the wings to enter the race before the next closed-door governors’ ballot in May. A Japanese foreign ministry official told Japanese journalists Amano would reenter the race. Minty said he would have consultations with supporters before deciding what to do. Feroukhi said both Amano and Minty had strong credentials, but told Reuters: “A consensus candidate (is needed), someone who doesn’t mark out clear differences like this … between the developed and developing countries. Someone for both.” The IAEA has a politically tricky mission — to catch secret nuclear bomb programs and to coordinate global cooperation in sharing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Feroukhi planned consultations to see if a consensus might emerge for one compromise candidate, in keeping with multilateral tradition and to avoid internal IAEA divisions later. Possible nominees include: Luis Echavarri, the Spanish director of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s nuclear energy agency Rogelio Pfirter, the Argentinean head of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in The Hague and a seasoned former nuclear treaty negotiator Milenko Skoknic, Chile’s ambassador to the IAEA and Feroukhi’s predecessor as board chairman. ElBaradei, who shared the Nobel peace prize with his agency in 2005, leaves office in November after 12 years. He was recently marked by spats with the Bush administration over what he saw as its warlike approach to resolving Iran’s nuclear issue. Agency officials have said they hope a change in U.S. foreign policy under President Barack Obama might shore up efforts to prevent the stealthy spread of nuclear weapons technology. He has signaled a readiness to talk without preconditions with Iran and Syria, both subject to IAEA investigations now at an impasse, and eventually double what ElBaradei has called a “shoestring” IAEA budget not up to tackling challenges ahead. We're not going anywhere. Stand up for truly independent, trusted news that you can count on! Donate now