Sacred Ground [home]
homeground zerofreedom towerarchitects

the innovative design study
An examination of the nine critically praised design proposals for Ground Zero.

After the six initial design proposals for rebuilding at Ground Zero were met with an overwhelmingly negative response from the public and critics alike in July 2002, the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation (LMDC) quickly changed gears and a month later invited architects from around the world to submit fresh ideas and plans for the site in what it termed the "Innovative Design Study."

The LMDC received 406 submissions from teams of architects around the world and, in September 2002, it chose six panelists to winnow down the list. The panelists -- Toshiko Mori, chair of the architecture department at the Harvard Design School; Eugenie Birch, chair of the city and regional planning department at the University of Pennsylvania; Richard Swett, architect and former congressman from New Hampshire; Kinshasha Holman Conwill, a New York City arts and management consultant; Terence Riley, chief architecture curator of the Museum of Modern Art; and Michael Van Valkenburgh, professor of landscape architecture at Harvard -- selected seven teams of architects, who offered nine different designs for the site.

In contrast to the reaction to the initial designs, the Innovative Design Study proposals were received with enthusiasm. A New York Post editorial written after the plans were released was headlined, "An Embarrassment of Riches," while a New York Daily News editorial opined that the plans were "overflowing with creativity and vision and raw emotion." The New York Times editorialized that "New York City received a gift of its kind it has almost never received before," and that the plans were "proud, bold and capable of helping us reimagine who we are in the wake of 9/11."


ids images
start the slideshow

Here is a look at the nine proposals that were selected for the Innovative Design Study.



· Innovative Design Study
Here on the LMDC's Web site are slideshows of the various architects' presentations, and the short essays they submitted with their designs.

· A Vision for Lower Manhattan: Context and Program for the Innovative Design Study
Also on the LMDC's Web site is the program that outlined the priorities and parameters for the designs.

· Rebuilding Lower Manhattan
This page on The New York Times' Web site contains a multimedia presentation in which the architects themselves narrate a slideshow of their projects and discuss their ideas.

· Designing Downtown
The New Yorker's architectural critic Paul Goldberger describes how the Innovative Design Study came about after the rejection of the original six proposals from Beyer Blinder Belle and evaluates the various designs. (The New Yorker, Jan. 6, 2003)



home · introduction · the designs for ground zero · the freedom tower · the architects · limits of architecture
links · chronology · discussion · producer's chat · press reaction · tapes & transcripts · credits · privacy policy
FRONTLINE home · wgbh · pbsi

posted sept. 7, 2004

FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of wgbh educational foundation.
background photograph courtesy LMDC
web site copyright 1995-2014 WGBH educational foundation