Given this history of environmental leadership, the policies enacted in California in 2006 should come as no surprise. But their range, practicality and aggressiveness are remarkable even for this progressive state. This episode will examine the two landmark bills passed in 2006 that are designed to regulate the state's greenhouse gas emissions: Assembly Bill 32, California's Global Warming Solutions Act; and Senate Bill 1368, a companion bill to Assembly Bill 32. The episode will also revisit some of the legislation that preceded these laws.
The essence of the two bills is that California has mandated a 25 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, and the state will also not import energy that fails to meet these same emissions standards. The first bill (AB 32) is vast in its reach and authorizes the California Air Resources Board to begin the process of measuring the amount of CO2 and other greenhouse gases coming from emitters (power plants, industries, even vehicles), and to ultimately enforce limits with financial penalties. The law also authorizes market-based emissions trading, where and when it is appropriate, to achieve the maximum gains at the lowest cost. Essentially the "cap and trade" emissions trading model allows the emitters with the lowest emissions to hold that reduction as credit and sell it to an emitter that is still above the limit, making it more profitable to reduce emissions even beyond the mandated limits.
Governor Schwarzenegger released the following statement regarding the deal struck between the Administration and the legislature on AB 32: "We can now move forward with developing a market-based system that makes California a world leader in the effort to reduce carbon emissions. The success of our system will be an example for other states and nations to follow as the fight against climate change continues. AB 32 strengthens our economy, cleans our environment and once again, establishes California as the leader in environmental protection."
Now the question on environmental activists' minds is, "Will the federal government follow California's lead?"
2. Why are there state policies and federal policies? Do they always have the same goals? Why or why not?
Link to resources to conduct research on these topics.
2. What important requirement does the companion bill, SB 1368, mandate for the energy that California imports from out of state? In what ways will this mandate encourage innovation?
3. What reasons do federal authorities cite for choosing not to implement these policies nationwide? Do you agree with these reasons? Why or why not?
NATIONAL STANDARDS FROM MCREL STANDARD