The icon of the Arctic, the polar bear, is the ultimate survivor in one of the harshest areas on Earth. Reigning over a world of ice, tundra, and snow, this carnivore would seem to have a lineage that traces back to some mammoth creature of the icy regions.
But in fact, the polar bear’s closest ancestor is a land carnivore we associate more strongly with our forests. Over the years, scientists have uncovered an evolutionary path suggesting that polar bears are a relatively new species, and actually a subspecies, of arctos, more widely known as the brown bear. Scientific evidence has found that the brown bear, a species that also includes grizzly bears, was a “precursor” to polar bears, which then went on to develop specializations for inhabiting the harsh Arctic.
Proving their genetic compatibility, brown bears and polar bears can mate and produce viable, or fertile, offspring. It is this reproductive viability that establishes that an animal belongs within a given species. In 2006, a hybrid grizzly/polar bear, which some call a “pizzly,” was discovered in the Canadian Arctic, providing researchers proof that polar bears and grizzly bears can interbreed, even in the wild. And when researchers in Alaska compared the DNA of brown bears from around the world, looking for genetic links, they made an interesting discovery about one population of brown bears in particular. Analysis of the DNA of a distinct population of brown bears living on Alaska’s ABC islands, 900 miles south of the nearest polar bear, revealed that the ABC bears were even more closely related to polar bears genetically than they were to other brown bears.
So just when did polar bears arise as a separate subspecies? Genetic models show that the emergence of the polar bear could have taken place as recently as 70,000 years ago or as many as 1.5 million years ago. For many years, a fossil found at Kew Bridge in London was considered the oldest polar bear specimen. The fossil then placed the evolution around 70,000 years ago. But recently, scientists uncovered a fossilized jawbone from an island in the Arctic Ocean midway between Norway and the North Pole, dated to be at least 100,000 years old. Scientists believe this jawbone may represent the remains of the oldest-known polar bear, thus marking the appearance of the polar bear earlier than previously thought.
Relying on the fossil record and DNA analysis, scientists have been able to arrive at a clearer picture of the polar bear’s evolutionary path over the millennia. Some 200,000 years ago, when glaciers covered much of Eurasia, the Arctic Ocean was completely frozen. It was during this challenging period that brown bears began to wander in search of food. Approximately 125,000 years ago a population of brown bears in the far north of their range was likely split off from their brown bear ancestors, perhaps because of competition for food. The population likely became isolated by massive glaciers and, while most died in the harsh environment, those bears with an evolutionary advantage — ideal coat color and thickness for extreme cold — survived and bred. Over thousands of years, this population of bears underwent further evolutionary change, adapting even more specialized traits for surviving the harsh polar environment. When life in the North demanded teeth better shaped for ripping apart seals than munching berries, the polar bear’s molar teeth changed significantly from those of the brown bear. The bears also grew white fur, which camouflaged them in their snow-covered surroundings and gave them a hunting advantage. Scientists believe that at first these bears scavenged seal carcasses that had washed ashore, and gradually began to hunt the seals by waiting at the water’s edge as the seals surfaced to breathe. This is believed to be an important step in the evolution of a new subspecies of bear — maritimus or the polar bear.
Nature once exerted such extreme pressure on the brown bear that it eventually gave rise to a new, better-adapted subspecies, the polar bear. Now, once again, evolutionary forces are acting on this long-enduring species. As the Arctic warms, the polar bear’s unique specializations that once lent it an evolutionary edge, may now be the creature’s downfall. A changing climate may name a new king of the Arctic — the fierce and opportunistic brown bear.





(21 votes)

I’m crying. How sad
waw! u know i never new that grizzlies evolved into polar bear! this is great info! thank you nature.
This isn’t sad– it shows the amazing adaptability of life! Nothing is permanent: not animals, not continents, not planets, not stars. There is nothing that isn’t changing in this world, least of all life. That we so lament change is the greatest failure of modern thought; that we pretend to so radically effect change on global scales is the greatest absurdity. This fixation on stasis hints that homo sapiens may be at an evolutionary dead end. Hopefully, this is not so, but rather, only a temporary cultural obsession. Hopefully it is not an indication that the brain which has carried us so far has assumed its final form to which no further change is possible. Otherwise our species will have no further evolutionary prospect than that of the cockroach. Ironically, our wish for permanence will have been granted, at least in the freezing of our own minds.
The author of this section plainly understands how evolution works- the bears that happen to have traits that enable them to survive the new conditions live, the rest die. However, he/she lapses into confusing language that could be interpreted to mean that the species- or even individuals- reacted to the new conditions by somehow creating structures that met the need. “When life in the North demanded teeth better shaped for ripping apart seals… the polar bear’s molar teeth changed significantly from those of the brown bear.” Please be more careful about this! There are many people in the US who have no understanding of evolution and resist teaching about it in schools- lets not confuse them further.
I hear people say that animals like these should, basically, pull up their socks and adapt, as if this were a choice individuals could make. Some species have genes that allow a wide range of behavior response; otherwise, individuals are stuck with the morpholgy and behavioral constraints they are born with and if these don’t work in the new conditions they die (or at least fail to reproduce). If species could react to specific pressures, evolution would happen faster and there would be more hope for animals caught in the rapid change our planet is experiencing.
As sad as it is, perhaps grizzlies and polar bears will be forced to become interbreed again and (if humans ever get global warming under control) then the bears will become two varieties again.
I hope we can prevent global warming in time to prevent the extinction of bears.
You provide no proof or scientific statements or sources for your speculation.
Until it is verified I take it with a grain of salt.
This is sad! I’m gonna cry!
I like polar bears. With my pie.
awwwww poor babiess.
hello agnes
lolll. you guys are ridonculous.
i love yer french accent mikey [:
Thedentition of polar bears has evolved smoothly from brown bears to U. maritimus tyrannus, the first polar bear, to the present day dentition of modern polar bears. These changes are consistent with the evolution of many species over the millions of years life has been present. It’s not a new concept Pat
Dolan. And a simple google search on the evolution of polar bears will lead anyone to many papers confirming the relationship of brown bears and polar bears. Unless of course you can’t read or wish to revel in your own opinions despite the facts.
BTW, adaption and evolution via species variation is a well known concept. Brown bears have a great deal of variation in hair color etc. With intense pressure of selection on a small population of animals you can see very rapid changes in a relatively short period of time.
One particular finch on the Galopolus Islands was greatly diminished in population by the recent arrival of another species of Finch with a larger beak. The larger beaked animal was able to eat certain berries better than the one with a smaller one. The population of the larger one exploded too much resulting in fierce competition for the larger berries which became much less common. This forced a great reduction in the larger beaked population of birds allowing the smaller beaked Finch to flourish again. It had adapted to other sources of food from diverse sources as a result of the initial pressures from the larger beaked bird. This happened since the time of Darwin’s expedition and actually really very recently.
A related principle applies to the emregence of antibiotic resistant bacteria over a short period of time. Evolution is not always something that happens slowly over millions of years. It can be quick.
Kurtz-
You’re not nearly as insightful as you perceive. Your notion that change in the biosphere, such as evolution, extinction, etc., are inevitable is obviously true, but your suggestion that humans have not 1) physically altered every component of the biosphere, which includes the atmosphere, and 2) increased the rates of species extinctions is simply absurd.
Every living thing on the earth changes after years, even humans. The reason why we change is so that we can survive better or adapt.
I agree with Pat Dolan that the language is confusing. The above description sounds more like a
demonstration of Larmarck’s evolutionary theory of inheritance of acquired traits than like Darwin’s
theory involving survival of those members of the species with traits best suited to live in a particular environment. The language used implies that a species or individual may react to new conditions by creating structure that meet a need. It would follow that these acquired traits could then be passed on to offspring.
It is not a speculation they spend years and hard work uncovering this information. They understand the pieces to the puzzle unlike those who speculate they are not doing the research to back up their theories.
wow this is so harsh poor bears whish i could do somethiing