Inside the First “All-Out War” Over a Supreme Court Nominee

May 20, 2019

Last week, Alabama enacted a law that essentially banned abortion. Lawmakers have stated that, in part, it was designed to prompt a challenge to Roe v. Wade.

In the aftermath, all eyes have been on the U.S. Supreme Court.

There has been a crush of anti-abortion legislation since Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation last fall tilted the court toward a conservative majority. Opponents of abortion now have what they believe is the best chance in a generation to overturn the landmark ruling. And they have Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to thank for it.

On Tuesday, the FRONTLINE documentary Supreme Revenge investigates the decades of consequential political brinkmanship that shaped the court’s current makeup. The film finds that for McConnell, Kavanaugh’s high-stakes confirmation to the swing seat vacated by Justice Anthony Kennedy was a crowning achievement. It was the culmination of a promise to retaliate for what the senator saw as unfair treatment of President Ronald Reagan’s Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork in the late 1980s.

The above excerpt from Supreme Revenge goes inside Bork’s failed nomination, which sparked the conservative desire for revenge that would ultimately help shape the court for decades to come.

In a heated effort to prevent Bork’s confirmation, liberal Democrats launched protests, phone banks and attack ads. In the Senate, Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) led the charge. “‘Just know that we’ll have to destroy him,'” former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) tells FRONTLINE he recalls Kennedy saying.

Democrats said they were spurred to action by Bork’s record on civil rights and social issues. “Everything that Bork had written and stood for meant that the civil rights and affirmative action push of… the civil rights movement was in danger,” Ethan Bronner, author of “Battle for Justice,” tells FRONTLINE.

But to McConnell — then a first-term senator — and other Republicans, the anti-Bork effort was an unfair attack based on the judge’s conservative ideology.

“It was the first moment that you saw all-out war over a Supreme Court nominee,” Republican pollster Frank Luntz tells FRONTLINE. “It really was the first example of the politics of destruction of the modern era.”

As the film goes on to detail, McConnell vowed that he and his Republican colleagues would fight back. And they did: “The forces for Bork who suffered that very painful defeat didn’t give up, didn’t go home to sulk,” Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times tells FRONTLINE in the documentary. “They went underground and built an infrastructure to create a new reality, a new reality for our judicial politics…”

For the full story on how that new reality came to be, watch Supreme Revenge. From FRONTLINE filmmaker Michael Kirk and his team, the documentary draws on dozens of interviews with key current and former U.S. senators — including Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) — White House and congressional staffers, insiders from multiple presidential administrations, legal experts, authors and journalists. Thirty-nine extended interviews from the making of Supreme Revenge will go live on FRONTLINE’s website in tandem with the documentary’s premiere, offering firsthand insights from three decades of Supreme Court confirmation battles that led to the Kavanaugh vote.

As conversation about the future of Roe v. Wade swirls, the film and these interviews are a must-watch look at how McConnell and his allies have come to dominate the court.

Supreme Revenge premieres Tuesday, May 21, 2019 on PBS,, and the PBS Video App (check local listings). The newest installment of the FRONTLINE Transparency Project, featuring 39 extended interviews from the making of Supreme Revenge, will launch that same evening.

Patrice Taddonio

Patrice Taddonio, Digital Writer & Audience Development Strategist, FRONTLINE



In order to foster a civil and literate discussion that respects all participants, FRONTLINE has the following guidelines for commentary. By submitting comments here, you are consenting to these rules:

Readers' comments that include profanity, obscenity, personal attacks, harassment, or are defamatory, sexist, racist, violate a third party's right to privacy, or are otherwise inappropriate, will be removed. Entries that are unsigned or are "signed" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We reserve the right to not post comments that are more than 400 words. We will take steps to block users who repeatedly violate our commenting rules, terms of use, or privacy policies. You are fully responsible for your comments.

blog comments powered by Disqus

More Stories

We Investigated 'Whose Vote Counts.' Our Findings Unfold Tonight.
A note from our executive producer about the new documentary 'Whose Vote Counts,' premiering Oct. 20.
October 20, 2020
How Associating Mail-in Ballots with Voter Fraud Became a Political Tool
Unsubstantiated warnings of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election echo a 1980s case involving Black civil rights activists and then-Alabama Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
October 20, 2020
Here's Why Concerns About Absentee Ballot Fraud Are Overhyped
We analyzed a conservative foundation's catalog of absentee ballot fraud and found no credible threat to the 2020 election.
October 20, 2020
How McConnell's Bid to Reshape the Federal Judiciary Extends Beyond the Supreme Court
Just as Sen. Mitch McConnell helped cement a conservative majority on the Supreme Court for decades to come, judicial experts and journalists who spoke to FRONTLINE credit him with holding open lower federal court vacancies that President Trump then filled with conservative judges at a breakneck pace.
October 16, 2020