A.FRUEAUFF FOUNDATION.

A.FRUEAUFF FOUNDATION.

>> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE A.FRUEAUFF FOUNDATION.

>> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY" >> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY" FIRST, HILLARY VERSUS ELIZABETH?

CONTRARY" FIRST, HILLARY VERSUS ELIZABETH?

THEN, HOBBY LOBBY'S NEXT FIRST, HILLARY VERSUS ELIZABETH?

THEN, HOBBY LOBBY'S NEXT PROJECT, A BIBLE MUSEUM IN THEN, HOBBY LOBBY'S NEXT PROJECT, A BIBLE MUSEUM IN WASHINGTON.

BEHIND THE PROJECT, A BIBLE MUSEUM IN WASHINGTON.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: WHY FEMALE GENITAL WASHINGTON.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: WHY FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION IS AN AMERICAN HEADLINES: WHY FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION IS AN AMERICAN PROBLEM.

MUTILATION IS AN AMERICAN PROBLEM.

HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

PROBLEM.

HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST, WOMEN DOMINATE THE PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST, WOMEN DOMINATE THE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL FIELD.

UP FIRST, WOMEN DOMINATE THE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL FIELD.

HILLARY CLINTON MAY NEED TO BE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL FIELD.

HILLARY CLINTON MAY NEED TO BE LOOKING TO HER LEFT AS SHE HILLARY CLINTON MAY NEED TO BE LOOKING TO HER LEFT AS SHE CONSIDERS HER SECOND RUN FOR THE LOOKING TO HER LEFT AS SHE CONSIDERS HER SECOND RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY.

CONSIDERS HER SECOND RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY.

SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN OF PRESIDENCY.

SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN OF MASSACHUSETTS IS GETTING WHAT SENATOR ELIZABETH WARREN OF MASSACHUSETTS IS GETTING WHAT SOME ARE CALLING A "ROCK STAR MASSACHUSETTS IS GETTING WHAT SOME ARE CALLING A "ROCK STAR RECEPTION" FROM LIBERALS AS SHE SOME ARE CALLING A "ROCK STAR RECEPTION" FROM LIBERALS AS SHE CAMPAIGNS FOR DEMOCRATIC RECEPTION" FROM LIBERALS AS SHE CAMPAIGNS FOR DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

CAMPAIGNS FOR DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

READY FOR WARREN LAUNCHED THIS CANDIDATES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

READY FOR WARREN LAUNCHED THIS WEEK WITH A WEBSITE, FACEBOOK READY FOR WARREN LAUNCHED THIS WEEK WITH A WEBSITE, FACEBOOK PAGE AND TWITTER ACCOUNT.

WEEK WITH A WEBSITE, FACEBOOK PAGE AND TWITTER ACCOUNT.

SUPPORTERS PLAN TO BE AT ALL OF PAGE AND TWITTER ACCOUNT.

SUPPORTERS PLAN TO BE AT ALL OF THE SENATOR'S APPEARANCES TO SUPPORTERS PLAN TO BE AT ALL OF THE SENATOR'S APPEARANCES TO ENCOURAGE HER TO RUN.

THE SENATOR'S APPEARANCES TO ENCOURAGE HER TO RUN.

THIS WEEKEND AT AN ANNUAL ENCOURAGE HER TO RUN.

THIS WEEKEND AT AN ANNUAL CONVENTION OF PROGRESSIVES, THIS WEEKEND AT AN ANNUAL CONVENTION OF PROGRESSIVES, CALLED NETROOTS NATION, THOSE CONVENTION OF PROGRESSIVES, CALLED NETROOTS NATION, THOSE SUPPORTERS ARE COMING FACE TO CALLED NETROOTS NATION, THOSE SUPPORTERS ARE COMING FACE TO FACE WITH SUPER-PAC READY FOR SUPPORTERS ARE COMING FACE TO FACE WITH SUPER-PAC READY FOR HILLARY.

FACE WITH SUPER-PAC READY FOR HILLARY.

THAT PAC HAS RAISED $89 -- EIGHT HILLARY.

THAT PAC HAS RAISED $89 -- EIGHT MILLIONED TO AND IS WORKING ON A THAT PAC HAS RAISED $89 -- EIGHT MILLIONED TO AND IS WORKING ON A GRASS ROOTS CAMPAIGN FOR THEIR MILLIONED TO AND IS WORKING ON A GRASS ROOTS CAMPAIGN FOR THEIR CANDIDATE, WHO STILL LEADS ALL GRASS ROOTS CAMPAIGN FOR THEIR CANDIDATE, WHO STILL LEADS ALL THE POLLS.

CANDIDATE, WHO STILL LEADS ALL THE POLLS.

WARREN CONTINUES TO SAY SHE IS THE POLLS.

WARREN CONTINUES TO SAY SHE IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

WARREN CONTINUES TO SAY SHE IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

DEBRA CARNAHAN NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

DEBRA CARNAHAN COULD SHE BE A SPOILER FOR DEBRA CARNAHAN COULD SHE BE A SPOILER FOR HILLARY CLIP TON THIS.

COULD SHE BE A SPOILER FOR HILLARY CLIP TON THIS.

>> I DON'T THINK SHE'S A SPOILER HILLARY CLIP TON THIS.

>> I DON'T THINK SHE'S A SPOILER I THINK SHE'S AN ASSET FOR >> I DON'T THINK SHE'S A SPOILER I THINK SHE'S AN ASSET FOR HILLARY CLINTON.

I THINK SHE'S AN ASSET FOR HILLARY CLINTON.

>> I AGREE, I DON'T THINK SHE'S HILLARY CLINTON.

>> I AGREE, I DON'T THINK SHE'S AN ASSET BUT A LONG LINE THAT >> I AGREE, I DON'T THINK SHE'S AN ASSET BUT A LONG LINE THAT YOU HAVE TO STAND BEHIND I DON'T AN ASSET BUT A LONG LINE THAT YOU HAVE TO STAND BEHIND I DON'T THINK SHE'S THERE YET.

YOU HAVE TO STAND BEHIND I DON'T THINK SHE'S THERE YET.

>> I THIS IT'S GREAT.

THINK SHE'S THERE YET.

>> I THIS IT'S GREAT.

I THINK AMERICA NEEDS MORE WOMEN >> I THIS IT'S GREAT.

I THINK AMERICA NEEDS MORE WOMEN IN POLITICS, I DON'T UNDERSTAND I THINK AMERICA NEEDS MORE WOMEN IN POLITICS, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY IT HAS TO BE EITHER OR AND IN POLITICS, I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY IT HAS TO BE EITHER OR AND WHY NOT BOTH?

WHY IT HAS TO BE EITHER OR AND WHY NOT BOTH?

>> OBVIOUSLY COMPETITION IS WHY NOT BOTH?

>> OBVIOUSLY COMPETITION IS GREAT.

>> OBVIOUSLY COMPETITION IS GREAT.

MY QUESTION IS, WHO IS GOING TO GREAT.

MY QUESTION IS, WHO IS GOING TO GO MORE TO THE RIGHT, IF SHE MY QUESTION IS, WHO IS GOING TO GO MORE TO THE RIGHT, IF SHE DOES RUN BETWEEN HER AND GO MORE TO THE RIGHT, IF SHE DOES RUN BETWEEN HER AND MRS. CLINTON WHO IS GOING TO DOES RUN BETWEEN HER AND MRS. CLINTON WHO IS GOING TO MOVE MORE TO THE RIGHT IN THIS MRS. CLINTON WHO IS GOING TO MOVE MORE TO THE RIGHT IN THIS CONTEST.

MOVE MORE TO THE RIGHT IN THIS CONTEST.

>> WHAT IN THE WORLD DO YOU MEAN CONTEST.

>> WHAT IN THE WORLD DO YOU MEAN BY AN ASSET?

>> WHAT IN THE WORLD DO YOU MEAN BY AN ASSET?

HOW COULD SHE BE AN ASSET?

BY AN ASSET?

HOW COULD SHE BE AN ASSET?

>> I THINK BECAUSE SHE HAS SAID HOW COULD SHE BE AN ASSET?

>> I THINK BECAUSE SHE HAS SAID SHE'S NOT GOING TO RUN, THAT'S >> I THINK BECAUSE SHE HAS SAID SHE'S NOT GOING TO RUN, THAT'S PRETTY DEFINITIVE.

SHE'S NOT GOING TO RUN, THAT'S PRETTY DEFINITIVE.

>> UNTIL THE POLLS START SHOWING PRETTY DEFINITIVE.

>> UNTIL THE POLLS START SHOWING THAT SHE SHOULD RUN.

>> UNTIL THE POLLS START SHOWING THAT SHE SHOULD RUN.

>> FOR RIGHT NOW, I TAKE HER AT THAT SHE SHOULD RUN.

>> FOR RIGHT NOW, I TAKE HER AT HER WORD.

>> FOR RIGHT NOW, I TAKE HER AT HER WORD.

SECONDLY ANOTHER STRONG WOMAN HER WORD.

SECONDLY ANOTHER STRONG WOMAN OUT THERE CAMPAIGNING, I THINK SECONDLY ANOTHER STRONG WOMAN OUT THERE CAMPAIGNING, I THINK ONLY HELPS HILLARY AND HELPS THE OUT THERE CAMPAIGNING, I THINK ONLY HELPS HILLARY AND HELPS THE PERCEPTION THAT, YES, WE ARE ONLY HELPS HILLARY AND HELPS THE PERCEPTION THAT, YES, WE ARE READY FOR MORE WOMEN LEADERSHIP PERCEPTION THAT, YES, WE ARE READY FOR MORE WOMEN LEADERSHIP AND HIGHER POSITIONS MORE READY FOR MORE WOMEN LEADERSHIP AND HIGHER POSITIONS MORE VISIBLY.

AND HIGHER POSITIONS MORE VISIBLY.

MAKES HILLARY LOOK STRONGER AS VISIBLY.

MAKES HILLARY LOOK STRONGER AS WOMAN, THAT SHE'S NOT THE ONLY MAKES HILLARY LOOK STRONGER AS WOMAN, THAT SHE'S NOT THE ONLY ONE OUT THERE.

WOMAN, THAT SHE'S NOT THE ONLY ONE OUT THERE.

>> THERE IS A SAYING THAT, ONE OUT THERE.

>> THERE IS A SAYING THAT, NOBODY BELIEVES A RUMOR UNTIL >> THERE IS A SAYING THAT, NOBODY BELIEVES A RUMOR UNTIL IT'S DENIED.

NOBODY BELIEVES A RUMOR UNTIL IT'S DENIED.

YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK IT'S IT'S DENIED.

YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO BE THAT EASY.

YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO BE THAT EASY.

I THINK DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS GOING TO BE THAT EASY.

I THINK DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS GETTING -- BUT YOU'VE GOT BIDEN, I THINK DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS GETTING -- BUT YOU'VE GOT BIDEN, O'MALLEY WHO HAS RAISED MILLIONS GETTING -- BUT YOU'VE GOT BIDEN, O'MALLEY WHO HAS RAISED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

O'MALLEY WHO HAS RAISED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.

YOU'VE GOT -- THERE'S ANOTHER OF DOLLARS.

YOU'VE GOT -- THERE'S ANOTHER CANDIDATEA LOT OF CANDIDATES YOU'VE GOT -- THERE'S ANOTHER CANDIDATEA LOT OF CANDIDATES THAT LONG AHEAD OF ELIZABETH.

CANDIDATEA LOT OF CANDIDATES THAT LONG AHEAD OF ELIZABETH.

BUT SHE'S BASKING IN THE GLOW OF THAT LONG AHEAD OF ELIZABETH.

BUT SHE'S BASKING IN THE GLOW OF ATTENTION.

BUT SHE'S BASKING IN THE GLOW OF ATTENTION.

>> I AGREE THAT SHE IS AN ASSET ATTENTION.

>> I AGREE THAT SHE IS AN ASSET BUT NOT FOR THE SAME THING THAT >> I AGREE THAT SHE IS AN ASSET BUT NOT FOR THE SAME THING THAT YOU SAID.

BUT NOT FOR THE SAME THING THAT YOU SAID.

AMERICA IS RANKING 5th FOR THE YOU SAID.

AMERICA IS RANKING 5th FOR THE NUMBER OF WOMEN THAT THEY HAVE AMERICA IS RANKING 5th FOR THE NUMBER OF WOMEN THAT THEY HAVE IN GOVERNMENT.

NUMBER OF WOMEN THAT THEY HAVE IN GOVERNMENT.

I THINK THE MORE WOMEN WE CAN IN GOVERNMENT.

I THINK THE MORE WOMEN WE CAN SEE THAT ARE QUALIFIED TO RUN I THINK THE MORE WOMEN WE CAN SEE THAT ARE QUALIFIED TO RUN FOR THE TOP JOB THAT ARE RUNNING SEE THAT ARE QUALIFIED TO RUN FOR THE TOP JOB THAT ARE RUNNING FOR THE TOP JOB, THAT IS A GREAT FOR THE TOP JOB THAT ARE RUNNING FOR THE TOP JOB, THAT IS A GREAT MESSAGE TO WOMEN, PERIOD.

FOR THE TOP JOB, THAT IS A GREAT MESSAGE TO WOMEN, PERIOD.

AROUND THE WORLD.

MESSAGE TO WOMEN, PERIOD.

AROUND THE WORLD.

>> YOU KNOW, I THINK BETWEEN THE AROUND THE WORLD.

>> YOU KNOW, I THINK BETWEEN THE TWO, IT WOULD BE AN INTERESTING >> YOU KNOW, I THINK BETWEEN THE TWO, IT WOULD BE AN INTERESTING CONTEST AND I DON'T KNOW IF I TWO, IT WOULD BE AN INTERESTING CONTEST AND I DON'T KNOW IF I AGREE SO MUCH AS AN ASSET AS I CONTEST AND I DON'T KNOW IF I AGREE SO MUCH AS AN ASSET AS I THINK A THORN IN HILLARY'S SIDE AGREE SO MUCH AS AN ASSET AS I THINK A THORN IN HILLARY'S SIDE TO SOME DEGREE.

THINK A THORN IN HILLARY'S SIDE TO SOME DEGREE.

SOME OF THE THINGS THAT -- TO SOME DEGREE.

SOME OF THE THINGS THAT -- >> RIGHT.

SOME OF THE THINGS THAT -- >> RIGHT.

BOTH AND -- >> RIGHT.

BOTH AND -- >> FORCE HILLARY IF ANYTHING TO BOTH AND -- >> FORCE HILLARY IF ANYTHING TO GO FURTHER LEFT.

>> FORCE HILLARY IF ANYTHING TO GO FURTHER LEFT.

I CAN JUST SEE THE SAME -- THE GO FURTHER LEFT.

I CAN JUST SEE THE SAME -- THE LEFT WING OF THE PARTY JUST LIKE I CAN JUST SEE THE SAME -- THE LEFT WING OF THE PARTY JUST LIKE RIGHT WING OF THE REPUBLICAN LEFT WING OF THE PARTY JUST LIKE RIGHT WING OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY TAKING THE PARTY DOWN RIGHT WING OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY TAKING THE PARTY DOWN TOWARDS NOMINATION OF ELIZABETH PARTY TAKING THE PARTY DOWN TOWARDS NOMINATION OF ELIZABETH WARREN WHO HAS ABSOLUTELY -- TOWARDS NOMINATION OF ELIZABETH WARREN WHO HAS ABSOLUTELY -- SHREWDLY NO CHANCE OF WINNING.

WARREN WHO HAS ABSOLUTELY -- SHREWDLY NO CHANCE OF WINNING.

>> HAVING DONE NUMEROUS SHREWDLY NO CHANCE OF WINNING.

>> HAVING DONE NUMEROUS CAMPAIGNS IN MY LIFE AND >> HAVING DONE NUMEROUS CAMPAIGNS IN MY LIFE AND NUMEROUS PRIMARIES ONE OF THE CAMPAIGNS IN MY LIFE AND NUMEROUS PRIMARIES ONE OF THE WORST THINGS YOU CAN HAVE IS A NUMEROUS PRIMARIES ONE OF THE WORST THINGS YOU CAN HAVE IS A CORONATION.

WORST THINGS YOU CAN HAVE IS A CORONATION.

WE SAW THAT LAST TIME WITH CORONATION.

WE SAW THAT LAST TIME WITH BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY THAT'S WE SAW THAT LAST TIME WITH BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY THAT'S WHY I SAY SHE'S AN ASSET.

BARACK OBAMA AND HILLARY THAT'S WHY I SAY SHE'S AN ASSET.

SHE'S STRONG.

WHY I SAY SHE'S AN ASSET.

SHE'S STRONG.

I DON'T THINK SHE CAN BEAT SHE'S STRONG.

I DON'T THINK SHE CAN BEAT HILLARY.

I DON'T THINK SHE CAN BEAT HILLARY.

I THINK SHE WILL EVENTUALLY GO HILLARY.

I THINK SHE WILL EVENTUALLY GO BACK AND SUPPORT HILLARY.

I THINK SHE WILL EVENTUALLY GO BACK AND SUPPORT HILLARY.

SHE SAID SHE'S SUPPORTING HER BACK AND SUPPORT HILLARY.

SHE SAID SHE'S SUPPORTING HER NOW.

SHE SAID SHE'S SUPPORTING HER NOW.

IT'S EXACTLY WHY WE HAVE THIS NOW.

IT'S EXACTLY WHY WE HAVE THIS PAC WITH HILLARY, DOESN'T WANT IT'S EXACTLY WHY WE HAVE THIS PAC WITH HILLARY, DOESN'T WANT TO BE OUT IN FRONT SO EARLY AND PAC WITH HILLARY, DOESN'T WANT TO BE OUT IN FRONT SO EARLY AND BEING ATTACKED.

TO BE OUT IN FRONT SO EARLY AND BEING ATTACKED.

ELIZABETH TAKES AWAY SOME OF THE BEING ATTACKED.

ELIZABETH TAKES AWAY SOME OF THE ATTACKS ON HILLARY, SOME OF THE ELIZABETH TAKES AWAY SOME OF THE ATTACKS ON HILLARY, SOME OF THE FOCUS.

ATTACKS ON HILLARY, SOME OF THE FOCUS.

I THINK SHE'S AN ASSET.

FOCUS.

I THINK SHE'S AN ASSET.

I REALLY DO.

I THINK SHE'S AN ASSET.

I REALLY DO.

>> CAN DO WITH OBAMA, JOIN MY I REALLY DO.

>> CAN DO WITH OBAMA, JOIN MY ADMINISTRATION, WHY DON'T YOU BE >> CAN DO WITH OBAMA, JOIN MY ADMINISTRATION, WHY DON'T YOU BE MY SECRETARY OF STATE OR VICE ADMINISTRATION, WHY DON'T YOU BE MY SECRETARY OF STATE OR VICE PRESIDENT THAT'S THAT PEOPLE MY SECRETARY OF STATE OR VICE PRESIDENT THAT'S THAT PEOPLE SAYING MORE WOMEN THE BETTER.

PRESIDENT THAT'S THAT PEOPLE SAYING MORE WOMEN THE BETTER.

>> RIGHT.

SAYING MORE WOMEN THE BETTER.

>> RIGHT.

HAS TO BE -- >> RIGHT.

HAS TO BE -- >> WHAT ABOUT THE OTHERS, AT HAS TO BE -- >> WHAT ABOUT THE OTHERS, AT THIS POINT, I KEEP THINKING IN >> WHAT ABOUT THE OTHERS, AT THIS POINT, I KEEP THINKING IN MY MIND THAT 2016 IS GOING TO BE THIS POINT, I KEEP THINKING IN MY MIND THAT 2016 IS GOING TO BE ANOTHER -- GOING TO COME IN AS MY MIND THAT 2016 IS GOING TO BE ANOTHER -- GOING TO COME IN AS FRONT RUNNER, SOMEBODY COMES OUT ANOTHER -- GOING TO COME IN AS FRONT RUNNER, SOMEBODY COMES OUT OF NO WHERE AND SHE -- OR SELF FRONT RUNNER, SOMEBODY COMES OUT OF NO WHERE AND SHE -- OR SELF DESTRUCTS AS SHE SORT DOMESTIC OF NO WHERE AND SHE -- OR SELF DESTRUCTS AS SHE SORT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SEVERAL WEEKS AGO, THE DESTRUCTS AS SHE SORT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SEVERAL WEEKS AGO, THE LINE ABOUT, WE WERE BROKE.

VIOLENCE SEVERAL WEEKS AGO, THE LINE ABOUT, WE WERE BROKE.

AND TRIED TO BACKTRACK.

LINE ABOUT, WE WERE BROKE.

AND TRIED TO BACKTRACK.

ALL THE BAD PUBLICITY AROUND AND TRIED TO BACKTRACK.

ALL THE BAD PUBLICITY AROUND CHELSEA'S JOB, SHE WOULD NOT BE ALL THE BAD PUBLICITY AROUND CHELSEA'S JOB, SHE WOULD NOT BE GETTING.

CHELSEA'S JOB, SHE WOULD NOT BE GETTING.

SOMEBODY IS GOING TO COME IN GETTING.

SOMEBODY IS GOING TO COME IN FROM, I WONDER QUITE FRANKLY WHY SOMEBODY IS GOING TO COME IN FROM, I WONDER QUITE FRANKLY WHY SENATOR GILLIBRAND FROM NEW YORK FROM, I WONDER QUITE FRANKLY WHY SENATOR GILLIBRAND FROM NEW YORK IS NOT BASH -- SHE COULD GET SENATOR GILLIBRAND FROM NEW YORK IS NOT BASH -- SHE COULD GET INDEPENDENT AND SOME IS NOT BASH -- SHE COULD GET INDEPENDENT AND SOME CONSERVATIVE VOTES IN THE INDEPENDENT AND SOME CONSERVATIVE VOTES IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.

CONSERVATIVE VOTES IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.

WHY ISN'T THERE MORE TALK ABOUT GENERAL ELECTION.

WHY ISN'T THERE MORE TALK ABOUT HER RIGHT NOW?

WHY ISN'T THERE MORE TALK ABOUT HER RIGHT NOW?

WARREN JUST NOT PRESIDENTIAL HER RIGHT NOW?

WARREN JUST NOT PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL WITH HER STANCES AS FAR WARREN JUST NOT PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL WITH HER STANCES AS FAR LEFT AS THEY ARE.

MATERIAL WITH HER STANCES AS FAR LEFT AS THEY ARE.

>> RIGHT.

LEFT AS THEY ARE.

>> RIGHT.

YOU KNOW, MAYBE THERE IS TALK >> RIGHT.

YOU KNOW, MAYBE THERE IS TALK ABOUT HER BECAUSE MAYBE SHE'S YOU KNOW, MAYBE THERE IS TALK ABOUT HER BECAUSE MAYBE SHE'S NOT INTERESTED IN DOING IT, ABOUT HER BECAUSE MAYBE SHE'S NOT INTERESTED IN DOING IT, NUMBER ONE.

NOT INTERESTED IN DOING IT, NUMBER ONE.

THAT IS A POSSIBILITY.

NUMBER ONE.

THAT IS A POSSIBILITY.

NOT EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE THAT IS A POSSIBILITY.

NOT EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT, ALTHOUGH MOST DO.

NOT EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT, ALTHOUGH MOST DO.

>> OLYMPIA SNOW, SUSAN COLLINS.

PRESIDENT, ALTHOUGH MOST DO.

>> OLYMPIA SNOW, SUSAN COLLINS.

>> OLYMPIA SNOW IS NOT A >> OLYMPIA SNOW, SUSAN COLLINS.

>> OLYMPIA SNOW IS NOT A DEMOCRAT.

>> OLYMPIA SNOW IS NOT A DEMOCRAT.

WE NEED DIVERSITY.

DEMOCRAT.

WE NEED DIVERSITY.

WHEN YOU TALKED ABOUT THE WE NEED DIVERSITY.

WHEN YOU TALKED ABOUT THE SENATE, TOLD THIS OLD STORY I WHEN YOU TALKED ABOUT THE SENATE, TOLD THIS OLD STORY I COVERED CAPITOL HILL IN THE SENATE, TOLD THIS OLD STORY I COVERED CAPITOL HILL IN THE '80S, RUBY DOSH A SENATOR COVERED CAPITOL HILL IN THE '80S, RUBY DOSH A SENATOR REPUBLICAN FROM MINNESOTA AND '80S, RUBY DOSH A SENATOR REPUBLICAN FROM MINNESOTA AND ANOTHER -- ONE OF THE SENATORS REPUBLICAN FROM MINNESOTA AND ANOTHER -- ONE OF THE SENATORS FROM HAWAII WHO WAS BORN IN ANOTHER -- ONE OF THE SENATORS FROM HAWAII WHO WAS BORN IN JAPAN, I BELIEVE.

FROM HAWAII WHO WAS BORN IN JAPAN, I BELIEVE.

AND THEY ARE SITTING THERE JAPAN, I BELIEVE.

AND THEY ARE SITTING THERE WATCHING THE STEP AT IN SESSION AND THEY ARE SITTING THERE WATCHING THE STEP AT IN SESSION AND BOSH WOULD TURN TO THE WATCHING THE STEP AT IN SESSION AND BOSH WOULD TURN TO THE SENATOR SAY, YOU KNOW, WE'RE THE AND BOSH WOULD TURN TO THE SENATOR SAY, YOU KNOW, WE'RE THE ONLY TWO GUYS IN THIS ROOM, AT SENATOR SAY, YOU KNOW, WE'RE THE ONLY TWO GUYS IN THIS ROOM, AT THAT POINT IT WAS GUYS, WHO ONLY TWO GUYS IN THIS ROOM, AT THAT POINT IT WAS GUYS, WHO AREN'T RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

THAT POINT IT WAS GUYS, WHO AREN'T RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

THAT'S BECAUSE WE CAN'T.

AREN'T RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

THAT'S BECAUSE WE CAN'T.

[ LAUGHTER ] THAT'S BECAUSE WE CAN'T.

[ LAUGHTER ] >> I WAS GOING TO SAY, ALTHOUGH [ LAUGHTER ] >> I WAS GOING TO SAY, ALTHOUGH MAY NOT SUPPORT THE PARTY IN THE >> I WAS GOING TO SAY, ALTHOUGH MAY NOT SUPPORT THE PARTY IN THE FIGHT FOR THE NEXT PRESIDENCY, I MAY NOT SUPPORT THE PARTY IN THE FIGHT FOR THE NEXT PRESIDENCY, I WILL SAY, IT IS A REFRESHING FIGHT FOR THE NEXT PRESIDENCY, I WILL SAY, IT IS A REFRESHING THING TO SEE THAT WE HAVE MORE WILL SAY, IT IS A REFRESHING THING TO SEE THAT WE HAVE MORE WOMEN.

THING TO SEE THAT WE HAVE MORE WOMEN.

WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT.

WOMEN.

WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT.

WE HAD -- BACK IN '80S WE HAD WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT.

WE HAD -- BACK IN '80S WE HAD FERRARA THAT WAS LIKE THE WE HAD -- BACK IN '80S WE HAD FERRARA THAT WAS LIKE THE TEASER, LIKE, A WOMAN MIGHT BE FERRARA THAT WAS LIKE THE TEASER, LIKE, A WOMAN MIGHT BE AIL TO RUN.

TEASER, LIKE, A WOMAN MIGHT BE AIL TO RUN.

IN THAT SENSE I THINK IT'S A AIL TO RUN.

IN THAT SENSE I THINK IT'S A GOOD THING.

IN THAT SENSE I THINK IT'S A GOOD THING.

>> BUT I DON'T THINK THE GUYS GOOD THING.

>> BUT I DON'T THINK THE GUYS ARE -- O'MALLEY, YOU GOT A WHOLE >> BUT I DON'T THINK THE GUYS ARE -- O'MALLEY, YOU GOT A WHOLE LOT OF OTHERS THAT IF HILLARY ARE -- O'MALLEY, YOU GOT A WHOLE LOT OF OTHERS THAT IF HILLARY DOESN'T RUN THEY'RE ALL GOING TO LOT OF OTHERS THAT IF HILLARY DOESN'T RUN THEY'RE ALL GOING TO JUMP IN.

DOESN'T RUN THEY'RE ALL GOING TO JUMP IN.

>> ARE THEY GOING TO JUMP IN IF JUMP IN.

>> ARE THEY GOING TO JUMP IN IF SHE DOES -- EVEN IF SHE DOES >> ARE THEY GOING TO JUMP IN IF SHE DOES -- EVEN IF SHE DOES RUN?

SHE DOES -- EVEN IF SHE DOES RUN?

SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE THE SOLE RUN?

SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE THE SOLE CANDIDATE FOR THE NOMINATION.

SHE'S NOT GOING TO BE THE SOLE CANDIDATE FOR THE NOMINATION.

>> I THINK IT'S -- CLINTON CANDIDATE FOR THE NOMINATION.

>> I THINK IT'S -- CLINTON DYNASTY IS PRETTY STRONG.

>> I THINK IT'S -- CLINTON DYNASTY IS PRETTY STRONG.

>> READY FOR HILLARY.

DYNASTY IS PRETTY STRONG.

>> READY FOR HILLARY.

>> WHEN YOU'RE EVALUATING THE >> READY FOR HILLARY.

>> WHEN YOU'RE EVALUATING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, I DON'T >> WHEN YOU'RE EVALUATING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, I DON'T THINK IF YOU WANT TO BE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, I DON'T THINK IF YOU WANT TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES THINK IF YOU WANT TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE FIRE IN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE FIRE IN THE BELLY, CERTAIN AMOUNT OF EGO, YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE FIRE IN THE BELLY, CERTAIN AMOUNT OF EGO, GOT TO BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN DO BELLY, CERTAIN AMOUNT OF EGO, GOT TO BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN DO IT, YOU HAVE TO REALLY WANT IT GOT TO BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN DO IT, YOU HAVE TO REALLY WANT IT BECAUSE IT'S GRUELING, AND THESE IT, YOU HAVE TO REALLY WANT IT BECAUSE IT'S GRUELING, AND THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO STAND BECAUSE IT'S GRUELING, AND THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO STAND ASIDE JUST BECAUSE HILLARY SAYS PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO STAND ASIDE JUST BECAUSE HILLARY SAYS I WANT IT.

ASIDE JUST BECAUSE HILLARY SAYS I WANT IT.

>> YEAH.

I WANT IT.

>> YEAH.

ALL RIGHT.

>> YEAH.

ALL RIGHT.

LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

ALL RIGHT.

LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE AND @TOTHECONTRARY.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE AND @TOTHECONTRARY.

FROM POLITICS TO RELIGION.

@BONNIEERBE AND @TOTHECONTRARY.

FROM POLITICS TO RELIGION.

THE FAMILY THAT OWNS HOBBY LOBBY FROM POLITICS TO RELIGION.

THE FAMILY THAT OWNS HOBBY LOBBY PLANS TO BUILD A BIBLE MUSEUM THE FAMILY THAT OWNS HOBBY LOBBY PLANS TO BUILD A BIBLE MUSEUM IN WASHINGTON, D.C. PLANS TO BUILD A BIBLE MUSEUM IN WASHINGTON, D.C. JUST TWO BLOCKS FROM THE IN WASHINGTON, D.C. JUST TWO BLOCKS FROM THE NATIONAL MALL.

JUST TWO BLOCKS FROM THE NATIONAL MALL.

THE GREEN FAMILY WON A SUPREME NATIONAL MALL.

THE GREEN FAMILY WON A SUPREME COURT CASE THAT ALLOWS THEIR THE GREEN FAMILY WON A SUPREME COURT CASE THAT ALLOWS THEIR COMPANY TO DENY CONTRACEPTION COURT CASE THAT ALLOWS THEIR COMPANY TO DENY CONTRACEPTION COVERAGE TO ITS EMPLOYEES.

COMPANY TO DENY CONTRACEPTION COVERAGE TO ITS EMPLOYEES.

FAMILY MEMBERS HAVE CALLED THE COVERAGE TO ITS EMPLOYEES.

FAMILY MEMBERS HAVE CALLED THE BIBLE "A RELIABLE HISTORICAL FAMILY MEMBERS HAVE CALLED THE BIBLE "A RELIABLE HISTORICAL DOCUMENT."

BIBLE "A RELIABLE HISTORICAL DOCUMENT."

PROPONENTS OF THE SEPARATION OF DOCUMENT."

PROPONENTS OF THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE BELIEVE THE PROPONENTS OF THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE BELIEVE THE GREENS WANT TO EVANGELIZE, NOT CHURCH AND STATE BELIEVE THE GREENS WANT TO EVANGELIZE, NOT EDUCATE.

GREENS WANT TO EVANGELIZE, NOT EDUCATE.

SECULARISTS ARE PARTICULARLY EDUCATE.

SECULARISTS ARE PARTICULARLY CONCERNED WITH THE MUSEUM'S SECULARISTS ARE PARTICULARLY CONCERNED WITH THE MUSEUM'S PROXIMITY TO CONGRESS, SAYING IT CONCERNED WITH THE MUSEUM'S PROXIMITY TO CONGRESS, SAYING IT COULD BE USED TO TRY TO PROXIMITY TO CONGRESS, SAYING IT COULD BE USED TO TRY TO INFLUENCE LAWS.

COULD BE USED TO TRY TO INFLUENCE LAWS.

AND HOBBY LOBBY HAS REASON TO INFLUENCE LAWS.

AND HOBBY LOBBY HAS REASON TO WANT TO AFFECT LEGISLATION.

AND HOBBY LOBBY HAS REASON TO WANT TO AFFECT LEGISLATION.

REPUBLICANS RECENTLY BLOCKED A WANT TO AFFECT LEGISLATION.

REPUBLICANS RECENTLY BLOCKED A BILL THAT WOULD OVERRIDE THE REPUBLICANS RECENTLY BLOCKED A BILL THAT WOULD OVERRIDE THE SUPREME COURT DECISION, BUT THE BILL THAT WOULD OVERRIDE THE SUPREME COURT DECISION, BUT THE DEMOCRATS WERE ONLY FOUR VOTES SUPREME COURT DECISION, BUT THE DEMOCRATS WERE ONLY FOUR VOTES SHORT.

DEMOCRATS WERE ONLY FOUR VOTES SHORT.

WITH ELECTIONS LOOMING, SENATE SHORT.

WITH ELECTIONS LOOMING, SENATE MAJORITY LEADER HARRY REID HAS WITH ELECTIONS LOOMING, SENATE MAJORITY LEADER HARRY REID HAS VOWED THE DEMOCRATS WILL MAJORITY LEADER HARRY REID HAS VOWED THE DEMOCRATS WILL CONTINUE TO PRESS THE ISSUE.

VOWED THE DEMOCRATS WILL CONTINUE TO PRESS THE ISSUE.

SO, DARLENES WASHINGTON NEED A CONTINUE TO PRESS THE ISSUE.

SO, DARLENES WASHINGTON NEED A BIBLE MUSEUM?

SO, DARLENES WASHINGTON NEED A BIBLE MUSEUM?

>> IF THEY WANT TO PAY FOR IT, BIBLE MUSEUM?

>> IF THEY WANT TO PAY FOR IT, SO BE IT.

>> IF THEY WANT TO PAY FOR IT, SO BE IT.

I THINK IT'S HUMOROUS THAT IT SO BE IT.

I THINK IT'S HUMOROUS THAT IT WILL BE A FEW BLOCKS FROM I THINK IT'S HUMOROUS THAT IT WILL BE A FEW BLOCKS FROM CONGRESS, YOU HAVE THE HERITAGE WILL BE A FEW BLOCKS FROM CONGRESS, YOU HAVE THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION, YOU HAVE A WHOLE CONGRESS, YOU HAVE THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION, YOU HAVE A WHOLE BOAT LOAD OF DIFFERENT FOUNDATION, YOU HAVE A WHOLE BOAT LOAD OF DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS, FAMILY RESEARCH BOAT LOAD OF DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL.

ORGANIZATIONS, FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL.

IF HE WANTS TO DO IT, HE'S USING COUNCIL.

IF HE WANTS TO DO IT, HE'S USING HIS OWN MONEY WHICH IS REALLY IF HE WANTS TO DO IT, HE'S USING HIS OWN MONEY WHICH IS REALLY THE IMPORTANT ISSUE, THEN I HIS OWN MONEY WHICH IS REALLY THE IMPORTANT ISSUE, THEN I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.

THE IMPORTANT ISSUE, THEN I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.

AS LONG AS NOT GETTING DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.

AS LONG AS NOT GETTING GOVERNMENT MONEY FOR IT, I DON'T AS LONG AS NOT GETTING GOVERNMENT MONEY FOR IT, I DON'T SEE THE PROBLEM WITH IT AT ALL.

GOVERNMENT MONEY FOR IT, I DON'T SEE THE PROBLEM WITH IT AT ALL.

>> I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH SEE THE PROBLEM WITH IT AT ALL.

>> I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH SOMEBODY USING THEIR OWN MONEY >> I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH SOMEBODY USING THEIR OWN MONEY IS BUILD A MUSEUM.

SOMEBODY USING THEIR OWN MONEY IS BUILD A MUSEUM.

I DO THINK IT'S INTERESTING, IS BUILD A MUSEUM.

I DO THINK IT'S INTERESTING, THOUGH, THAT THERE WAS HUGE I DO THINK IT'S INTERESTING, THOUGH, THAT THERE WAS HUGE OUTCRY FROM THE RIGHT WHEN THEY THOUGH, THAT THERE WAS HUGE OUTCRY FROM THE RIGHT WHEN THEY WANTED TO BUILD A COMMUNITY OUTCRY FROM THE RIGHT WHEN THEY WANTED TO BUILD A COMMUNITY CENTER FROM 9/11 LIKE ONE BLOCK WANTED TO BUILD A COMMUNITY CENTER FROM 9/11 LIKE ONE BLOCK FROM THE 9/11 SITE THAT WAS CENTER FROM 9/11 LIKE ONE BLOCK FROM THE 9/11 SITE THAT WAS MUSLIM, OH, YOU CAN'T BUILD THAT FROM THE 9/11 SITE THAT WAS MUSLIM, OH, YOU CAN'T BUILD THAT EVEN THOUGH THAT WAS INDEPENDENT MUSLIM, OH, YOU CAN'T BUILD THAT EVEN THOUGH THAT WAS INDEPENDENT MONEY AND COMMUNITY CENTER.

EVEN THOUGH THAT WAS INDEPENDENT MONEY AND COMMUNITY CENTER.

WHY IS THIS THEN DIFFERENT THAN MONEY AND COMMUNITY CENTER.

WHY IS THIS THEN DIFFERENT THAN THAT CONTROVERSY AT THE TIME.

WHY IS THIS THEN DIFFERENT THAN THAT CONTROVERSY AT THE TIME.

>> THIS IS CHRISTIAN.

THAT CONTROVERSY AT THE TIME.

>> THIS IS CHRISTIAN.

>> I THINK THE QUESTION IF A >> THIS IS CHRISTIAN.

>> I THINK THE QUESTION IF A MUSLIM FAMILY WANT TO BUILD A >> I THINK THE QUESTION IF A MUSLIM FAMILY WANT TO BUILD A BUILDING DEDICATED TO THE MOSQUE MUSLIM FAMILY WANT TO BUILD A BUILDING DEDICATED TO THE MOSQUE ON THE NATIONAL MALL WE'D HAVE BUILDING DEDICATED TO THE MOSQUE ON THE NATIONAL MALL WE'D HAVE VERY DIFFERENT CONVERSATION.

ON THE NATIONAL MALL WE'D HAVE VERY DIFFERENT CONVERSATION.

THAT CENTER THAT THEY WERE GOING VERY DIFFERENT CONVERSATION.

THAT CENTER THAT THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE BY THE 9/11 GROUNDS WAS THAT CENTER THAT THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE BY THE 9/11 GROUNDS WAS QUICKLY CALLED THE GROUND ZERO TO HAVE BY THE 9/11 GROUNDS WAS QUICKLY CALLED THE GROUND ZERO MOSQUE.

QUICKLY CALLED THE GROUND ZERO MOSQUE.

MY GOODNESS, THAT WAS A -- YOU MOSQUE.

MY GOODNESS, THAT WAS A -- YOU NEVER HEAR ABOUT IT ANY MORE.

MY GOODNESS, THAT WAS A -- YOU NEVER HEAR ABOUT IT ANY MORE.

I JUST THINK RELIGION DOESN'T NEVER HEAR ABOUT IT ANY MORE.

I JUST THINK RELIGION DOESN'T BELONG IN LEGISLATION, ISN'T I JUST THINK RELIGION DOESN'T BELONG IN LEGISLATION, ISN'T THAT THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS BELONG IN LEGISLATION, ISN'T THAT THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS COUNTRY?

THAT THE WHOLE POINT OF THIS COUNTRY?

>> GO AHEAD.

COUNTRY?

>> GO AHEAD.

>> YOU KNOW, AS LONG AS THERE'S >> GO AHEAD.

>> YOU KNOW, AS LONG AS THERE'S SOMEBODY OUT THERE, I JUST THINK >> YOU KNOW, AS LONG AS THERE'S SOMEBODY OUT THERE, I JUST THINK IT'S VERY ODD THAT JUST BECAUSE SOMEBODY OUT THERE, I JUST THINK IT'S VERY ODD THAT JUST BECAUSE ONE EXTREMIST FAMILY, THEY ON IT'S VERY ODD THAT JUST BECAUSE ONE EXTREMIST FAMILY, THEY ON THE EXTREME RIGHT WING, THEY'RE ONE EXTREMIST FAMILY, THEY ON THE EXTREME RIGHT WING, THEY'RE NOT -- THEY ARE EVANGELICAL THE EXTREME RIGHT WING, THEY'RE NOT -- THEY ARE EVANGELICAL THEY'RE TRYING TO DICTATE NOT -- THEY ARE EVANGELICAL THEY'RE TRYING TO DICTATE CORPORATE POLICY BASED ON THEIR THEY'RE TRYING TO DICTATE CORPORATE POLICY BASED ON THEIR OWN RELIGION BECAUSE THEY HAVE CORPORATE POLICY BASED ON THEIR OWN RELIGION BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE MONEY THAT THEY SHOULD BE OWN RELIGION BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE MONEY THAT THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO THIS IN WASHINGTON.

THE MONEY THAT THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO THIS IN WASHINGTON.

AND I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THEY ABLE TO DO THIS IN WASHINGTON.

AND I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THEY WILL BE VISITORS TO THIS MUSEUM.

AND I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THEY WILL BE VISITORS TO THIS MUSEUM.

EVANGELICALS COME TO WASHINGTON.

WILL BE VISITORS TO THIS MUSEUM.

EVANGELICALS COME TO WASHINGTON.

>> I'M ACTUALLY ALL FOR IT.

EVANGELICALS COME TO WASHINGTON.

>> I'M ACTUALLY ALL FOR IT.

I THINK LOOK AT THE HISTORY, >> I'M ACTUALLY ALL FOR IT.

I THINK LOOK AT THE HISTORY, LOOK AT OUR ROOTS, THERE'S THIS I THINK LOOK AT THE HISTORY, LOOK AT OUR ROOTS, THERE'S THIS WHOLE NATION EXCEPT FOR NATIVE LOOK AT OUR ROOTS, THERE'S THIS WHOLE NATION EXCEPT FOR NATIVE AMERICANS WAS FOUNDED ON FAITH.

WHOLE NATION EXCEPT FOR NATIVE AMERICANS WAS FOUNDED ON FAITH.

YOU LOOK AT THE PLEDGE OF AMERICANS WAS FOUNDED ON FAITH.

YOU LOOK AT THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

YOU LOOK AT THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

YOU LOOK AT THE DECLARATION OF ALLEGIANCE.

YOU LOOK AT THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

YOU LOOK AT THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

WHEN I DID MY SWEARING IN, SO INDEPENDENCE.

WHEN I DID MY SWEARING IN, SO HELP ME GOD.

WHEN I DID MY SWEARING IN, SO HELP ME GOD.

>> THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND HELP ME GOD.

>> THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE.

>> THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE.

>> I THINK IT'S PART OF OUR STATE.

>> I THINK IT'S PART OF OUR HERITAGE.

>> I THINK IT'S PART OF OUR HERITAGE.

I THINK HAVE MUSEUM THAT HERITAGE.

I THINK HAVE MUSEUM THAT REFLECTS THE HISTORY -- I THINK HAVE MUSEUM THAT REFLECTS THE HISTORY -- >> I THINK ANYBODY WOULD BE -- REFLECTS THE HISTORY -- >> I THINK ANYBODY WOULD BE -- LET ME JUST -- WOULD BE >> I THINK ANYBODY WOULD BE -- LET ME JUST -- WOULD BE PROTESTING IT, FOR EXAMPLE, LET ME JUST -- WOULD BE PROTESTING IT, FOR EXAMPLE, THERE'S MUSEUM OF THE OLD PROTESTING IT, FOR EXAMPLE, THERE'S MUSEUM OF THE OLD TESTAMENT IN ISRAEL AND IT'S THERE'S MUSEUM OF THE OLD TESTAMENT IN ISRAEL AND IT'S VERY HISTORICAL, IT'S TESTAMENT IN ISRAEL AND IT'S VERY HISTORICAL, IT'S EDUCATIONAL.

VERY HISTORICAL, IT'S EDUCATIONAL.

THEY HAVE PIECES OF THE DEAD SEA EDUCATIONAL.

THEY HAVE PIECES OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS BUT NOT AT ALL EVANGEL THEY HAVE PIECES OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS BUT NOT AT ALL EVANGEL CALL BECAUSE THE JEWISH RELIGION SCROLLS BUT NOT AT ALL EVANGEL CALL BECAUSE THE JEWISH RELIGION IS NOT EVANGELICAL.

CALL BECAUSE THE JEWISH RELIGION IS NOT EVANGELICAL.

BUT CHRISTIANITY S. I'M SAYING IS NOT EVANGELICAL.

BUT CHRISTIANITY S. I'M SAYING THERE IS AN -- YOU'RE IGNORING BUT CHRISTIANITY S. I'M SAYING THERE IS AN -- YOU'RE IGNORING THE DIFFERENCE WHICH IS THE THERE IS AN -- YOU'RE IGNORING THE DIFFERENCE WHICH IS THE EVANGELICAL, THE CONVERSION, THE DIFFERENCE WHICH IS THE EVANGELICAL, THE CONVERSION, TRYING TO PRESSURE PEOPLE IN TO EVANGELICAL, THE CONVERSION, TRYING TO PRESSURE PEOPLE IN TO ADAPTING CHRISTIANITY THAT TRYING TO PRESSURE PEOPLE IN TO ADAPTING CHRISTIANITY THAT EXISTS.

ADAPTING CHRISTIANITY THAT EXISTS.

THAT'S OFFENSIVE TO ALL EXISTS.

THAT'S OFFENSIVE TO ALL AMERICANS WHO AREN'T.

THAT'S OFFENSIVE TO ALL AMERICANS WHO AREN'T.

>> THERE'S A PRESUMPTION THAT AMERICANS WHO AREN'T.

>> THERE'S A PRESUMPTION THAT THEY'RE GOING TO PROTEAS LA >> THERE'S A PRESUMPTION THAT THEY'RE GOING TO PROTEAS LA ADVERTISE.

THEY'RE GOING TO PROTEAS LA ADVERTISE.

>> YOU FULLY BELIEVE -- ADVERTISE.

>> YOU FULLY BELIEVE -- >> I HAVE TO -- WE WERE NOT >> YOU FULLY BELIEVE -- >> I HAVE TO -- WE WERE NOT FOUNDED ON JUDEA-CHRISTIAN >> I HAVE TO -- WE WERE NOT FOUNDED ON JUDEA-CHRISTIAN BELIEFS.

FOUNDED ON JUDEA-CHRISTIAN BELIEFS.

NOT FOUNDED ON RELIGION IF YOU BELIEFS.

NOT FOUNDED ON RELIGION IF YOU GO BACK READ THE WRITINGS OF NOT FOUNDED ON RELIGION IF YOU GO BACK READ THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON, JAMES MADISON, GO BACK READ THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON, JAMES MADISON, GEORGE WASHINGTON THEY ACTUALLY THOMAS JEFFERSON, JAMES MADISON, GEORGE WASHINGTON THEY ACTUALLY TALK ABOUT SEPARATION OF CHURCH GEORGE WASHINGTON THEY ACTUALLY TALK ABOUT SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE AND KEEPING RELIGION TALK ABOUT SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE AND KEEPING RELIGION OUT OF IT.

AND STATE AND KEEPING RELIGION OUT OF IT.

IN GOD WE TRUST WAS PUT OP OUR OUT OF IT.

IN GOD WE TRUST WAS PUT OP OUR MONEY BACK I THINK IT WAS IN THE IN GOD WE TRUST WAS PUT OP OUR MONEY BACK I THINK IT WAS IN THE '50s THAT IT WAS PUT ON.

MONEY BACK I THINK IT WAS IN THE '50s THAT IT WAS PUT ON.

WE DON'T SAY "IN GOD WE TRUST" '50s THAT IT WAS PUT ON.

WE DON'T SAY "IN GOD WE TRUST" IN THE DECLARATION OF WE DON'T SAY "IN GOD WE TRUST" IN THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

IN THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

LET'S NOT SAY THAT ANY MORE INDEPENDENCE.

LET'S NOT SAY THAT ANY MORE BECAUSE IT'S NOT TRUE.

LET'S NOT SAY THAT ANY MORE BECAUSE IT'S NOT TRUE.

WE WERE FOUNDED ON RELIGIOUS BECAUSE IT'S NOT TRUE.

WE WERE FOUNDED ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.

WE WERE FOUNDED ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.

ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.

FREEDOM.

ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.

AND THAT IS IN THE WRITINGS OF ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.

AND THAT IS IN THE WRITINGS OF THE FOUNDERS OF THE PEOPLE THAT AND THAT IS IN THE WRITINGS OF THE FOUNDERS OF THE PEOPLE THAT WROTE IT.

THE FOUNDERS OF THE PEOPLE THAT WROTE IT.

THERE IS CAUSE FOR ALARM, WROTE IT.

THERE IS CAUSE FOR ALARM, BECAUSE WHEN I HEAR YOU SAYING THERE IS CAUSE FOR ALARM, BECAUSE WHEN I HEAR YOU SAYING THIS, TO ME THAT'S JUST SAME BECAUSE WHEN I HEAR YOU SAYING THIS, TO ME THAT'S JUST SAME THING TO BONNIE'S POINT THAT THIS, TO ME THAT'S JUST SAME THING TO BONNIE'S POINT THAT IS -- THIS IS OUR COUNTRY, THIS THING TO BONNIE'S POINT THAT IS -- THIS IS OUR COUNTRY, THIS IS WHAT WE'RE FOUNDED ON.

IS -- THIS IS OUR COUNTRY, THIS IS WHAT WE'RE FOUNDED ON.

WE'RE CHRISTIAN COUNTRY NOT IS WHAT WE'RE FOUNDED ON.

WE'RE CHRISTIAN COUNTRY NOT FOUNDED ON THE -- WE'RE CHRISTIAN COUNTRY NOT FOUNDED ON THE -- >> TO MAKE PRESUMPTION THAT FOUNDED ON THE -- >> TO MAKE PRESUMPTION THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE >> TO MAKE PRESUMPTION THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE PROSELYTIZING, IT'S FALSE.

THEY'RE GOING TO BE PROSELYTIZING, IT'S FALSE.

THEY HAVE -- START HAVING PROSELYTIZING, IT'S FALSE.

THEY HAVE -- START HAVING PREACHERS AND MINISTERS HAVING THEY HAVE -- START HAVING PREACHERS AND MINISTERS HAVING SERMON THAT IS A CHURCH THAT'S PREACHERS AND MINISTERS HAVING SERMON THAT IS A CHURCH THAT'S NOT WHAT IS HAPPENING.

SERMON THAT IS A CHURCH THAT'S NOT WHAT IS HAPPENING.

>> IT'S NOT SO RANDOM, LIKE THIS NOT WHAT IS HAPPENING.

>> IT'S NOT SO RANDOM, LIKE THIS COMPANY IS -- >> IT'S NOT SO RANDOM, LIKE THIS COMPANY IS -- >> WHY SHOULD THEY HAVE THE COMPANY IS -- >> WHY SHOULD THEY HAVE THE RIGHT -- >> WHY SHOULD THEY HAVE THE RIGHT -- >> THEY'RE ALREADY INFLUENCING RIGHT -- >> THEY'RE ALREADY INFLUENCING LEGISLATION.

>> THEY'RE ALREADY INFLUENCING LEGISLATION.

HOBBY LOBBY -- LEGISLATION.

HOBBY LOBBY -- >> RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT THAT HOBBY LOBBY -- >> RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT THAT SUPREME COURT UPHELD WAS PASSED >> RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT THAT SUPREME COURT UPHELD WAS PASSED IN 1993 WAS PRESIDENT CLINTON SUPREME COURT UPHELD WAS PASSED IN 1993 WAS PRESIDENT CLINTON SIGNING OFF ON IT.

IN 1993 WAS PRESIDENT CLINTON SIGNING OFF ON IT.

THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS HOBBY SIGNING OFF ON IT.

THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS HOBBY LOBBY DOESN'T PREVENT WOMEN FROM THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS HOBBY LOBBY DOESN'T PREVENT WOMEN FROM HAVING CONTRACEPTIVES.

LOBBY DOESN'T PREVENT WOMEN FROM HAVING CONTRACEPTIVES.

>> BUT THEY COVER 16 OF THEM.

HAVING CONTRACEPTIVES.

>> BUT THEY COVER 16 OF THEM.

FOUR THAT WON'T COVER FOR >> BUT THEY COVER 16 OF THEM.

FOUR THAT WON'T COVER FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS AND THOSE FOUR THAT WON'T COVER FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS AND THOSE WOMEN CAN GET -- RELIGIOUS REASONS AND THOSE WOMEN CAN GET -- >> THAT'S THE -- WOMEN CAN GET -- >> THAT'S THE -- >> FROM THE -- >> THAT'S THE -- >> FROM THE -- >> HERE IS THE PROBLEM WITH >> FROM THE -- >> HERE IS THE PROBLEM WITH HOBBY LOBBY THEY ARE NOT A >> HERE IS THE PROBLEM WITH HOBBY LOBBY THEY ARE NOT A PERSON.

HOBBY LOBBY THEY ARE NOT A PERSON.

THEY ARE A COMPANY.

PERSON.

THEY ARE A COMPANY.

YOU HAVE A COMPANY GOING, I'M THEY ARE A COMPANY.

YOU HAVE A COMPANY GOING, I'M GOING TO TELL YOU WHAT BIRTH YOU HAVE A COMPANY GOING, I'M GOING TO TELL YOU WHAT BIRTH CONTROL I WILL PAY FOR BECAUSE GOING TO TELL YOU WHAT BIRTH CONTROL I WILL PAY FOR BECAUSE OF MY RELIGIOUS -- CONTROL I WILL PAY FOR BECAUSE OF MY RELIGIOUS -- >> THEY'RE ALREADY IMPOSING OF MY RELIGIOUS -- >> THEY'RE ALREADY IMPOSING THEIR -- >> THEY'RE ALREADY IMPOSING THEIR -- >> HIDE BEHIND THE CORPORATE THEIR -- >> HIDE BEHIND THE CORPORATE VEIL.

>> HIDE BEHIND THE CORPORATE VEIL.

>> THE COURT INTERPRETED THAT VEIL.

>> THE COURT INTERPRETED THAT FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS CAN BE A >> THE COURT INTERPRETED THAT FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS CAN BE A PERSON JUST AS NOT FOR PROFIT FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS CAN BE A PERSON JUST AS NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS CAN BE A PERSON.

PERSON JUST AS NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS CAN BE A PERSON.

THEY SHOULDN'T BE PUNISHED CORPORATIONS CAN BE A PERSON.

THEY SHOULDN'T BE PUNISHED BECAUSE THEY HAPPEN TO BE A THEY SHOULDN'T BE PUNISHED BECAUSE THEY HAPPEN TO BE A FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION.

BECAUSE THEY HAPPEN TO BE A FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION.

>> SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO IMPOSE FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION.

>> SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO IMPOSE THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.

>> SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO IMPOSE THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.

>> THAT'S WHAT THE -- THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.

>> THAT'S WHAT THE -- >> ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.

>> THAT'S WHAT THE -- >> ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.

>> RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT ALLOWS >> ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.

>> RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT ALLOWS THIS TO HAPPEN.

>> RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT ALLOWS THIS TO HAPPEN.

>> OKAY.

THIS TO HAPPEN.

>> OKAY.

DO WE THINK -- WHY DID ATTEMPT >> OKAY.

DO WE THINK -- WHY DID ATTEMPT TOE OVERRIDE THIS IN THE SENATE DO WE THINK -- WHY DID ATTEMPT TOE OVERRIDE THIS IN THE SENATE FAIL AND WILL IT -- ANY CHANCE TOE OVERRIDE THIS IN THE SENATE FAIL AND WILL IT -- ANY CHANCE IT WILL PASS IN THE FUTURE?

FAIL AND WILL IT -- ANY CHANCE IT WILL PASS IN THE FUTURE?

>> MY UNDERSTANDING WAS HARRY IT WILL PASS IN THE FUTURE?

>> MY UNDERSTANDING WAS HARRY REID WANTED IT TO FAIL BECAUSE >> MY UNDERSTANDING WAS HARRY REID WANTED IT TO FAIL BECAUSE OF THE LANGUAGE IN IT THAT HE REID WANTED IT TO FAIL BECAUSE OF THE LANGUAGE IN IT THAT HE WANTED TO CHANGE THE LANGUAGE OF THE LANGUAGE IN IT THAT HE WANTED TO CHANGE THE LANGUAGE AROUND AND GOING TO BRING IT UP WANTED TO CHANGE THE LANGUAGE AROUND AND GOING TO BRING IT UP AGAIN TOWARDS THE END OF THE AROUND AND GOING TO BRING IT UP AGAIN TOWARDS THE END OF THE YEAR.

AGAIN TOWARDS THE END OF THE YEAR.

>> YOU THINK IT WILL PASS?

YEAR.

>> YOU THINK IT WILL PASS?

>> INDEPENDENT -- >> YOU THINK IT WILL PASS?

>> INDEPENDENT -- >> DEPENDS ON WHO WINS.

>> INDEPENDENT -- >> DEPENDS ON WHO WINS.

THERE'S A STRONG POSSIBILITY >> DEPENDS ON WHO WINS.

THERE'S A STRONG POSSIBILITY THAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL TAKE THERE'S A STRONG POSSIBILITY THAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL TAKE IT.

THAT THE REPUBLICANS WILL TAKE IT.

>> AREN'T YOU TALKING ABOUT -- IT.

>> AREN'T YOU TALKING ABOUT -- >> BEFORE THE NEW CONGRESS WOULD >> AREN'T YOU TALKING ABOUT -- >> BEFORE THE NEW CONGRESS WOULD COME IN.

>> BEFORE THE NEW CONGRESS WOULD COME IN.

THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BRING IT COME IN.

THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BRING IT UP AGAIN.

THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BRING IT UP AGAIN.

>> AND I MEAN -- UP AGAIN.

>> AND I MEAN -- >> SOME PEOPLE -- GO AHEAD.

>> AND I MEAN -- >> SOME PEOPLE -- GO AHEAD.

>> ON THEIR WAY OUT.

>> SOME PEOPLE -- GO AHEAD.

>> ON THEIR WAY OUT.

>> WHAT ABOUT IF THIS MUSEUM, >> ON THEIR WAY OUT.

>> WHAT ABOUT IF THIS MUSEUM, FOR EXAMPLE, STARTS HOLDING >> WHAT ABOUT IF THIS MUSEUM, FOR EXAMPLE, STARTS HOLDING EVENTS JUST FOR MEMBERS OF FOR EXAMPLE, STARTS HOLDING EVENTS JUST FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO TRY TO PERSUADE THEM EVENTS JUST FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO TRY TO PERSUADE THEM ON LEGISLATION, YOU DON'T HAVE CONGRESS TO TRY TO PERSUADE THEM ON LEGISLATION, YOU DON'T HAVE LOBBY THEM ON LEGISLATION, YOU ON LEGISLATION, YOU DON'T HAVE LOBBY THEM ON LEGISLATION, YOU DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT?

LOBBY THEM ON LEGISLATION, YOU DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT?

>> THEY GOT ALL KINDS OF DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT?

>> THEY GOT ALL KINDS OF LOBBYING GROUPS THAT GO AND THEY >> THEY GOT ALL KINDS OF LOBBYING GROUPS THAT GO AND THEY DO THAT NOW.

LOBBYING GROUPS THAT GO AND THEY DO THAT NOW.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE MUSEUM.

DO THAT NOW.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE MUSEUM.

I BELIEVE WHAT THEY'RE SAYING YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE MUSEUM.

I BELIEVE WHAT THEY'RE SAYING THEY WANT A MUSEUM TO RECOGNIZE I BELIEVE WHAT THEY'RE SAYING THEY WANT A MUSEUM TO RECOGNIZE HISTORICAL VALUE OF THE BIBLE, THEY WANT A MUSEUM TO RECOGNIZE HISTORICAL VALUE OF THE BIBLE, WHY CAN'T WE -- WE SHOULD ACCEPT HISTORICAL VALUE OF THE BIBLE, WHY CAN'T WE -- WE SHOULD ACCEPT THAT.

WHY CAN'T WE -- WE SHOULD ACCEPT THAT.

I DON'T THINK WE HAVE AS MUCH THAT.

I DON'T THINK WE HAVE AS MUCH NOISE IF IT WAS FOR THE KORAN.

I DON'T THINK WE HAVE AS MUCH NOISE IF IT WAS FOR THE KORAN.

>> CAN I ASK YOU SOMETHING?

NOISE IF IT WAS FOR THE KORAN.

>> CAN I ASK YOU SOMETHING?

>> AROUND A MOSQUE CLOSE TO >> CAN I ASK YOU SOMETHING?

>> AROUND A MOSQUE CLOSE TO 9/11.

>> AROUND A MOSQUE CLOSE TO 9/11.

>> BECAUSE THE INDIVIDUALS WHO 9/11.

>> BECAUSE THE INDIVIDUALS WHO KILLED OVER 3,000 PEOPLE WERE >> BECAUSE THE INDIVIDUALS WHO KILLED OVER 3,000 PEOPLE WERE EXTREMIST RADICAL MUSLIMS.

KILLED OVER 3,000 PEOPLE WERE EXTREMIST RADICAL MUSLIMS.

THE ISSUE IS THAT, NOT TO SAY EXTREMIST RADICAL MUSLIMS.

THE ISSUE IS THAT, NOT TO SAY THAT THE INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD THE ISSUE IS THAT, NOT TO SAY THAT THE INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD USE THAT -- THE MOSQUE OR THE THAT THE INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD USE THAT -- THE MOSQUE OR THE CENTER RATHER ARE OF THE SAME USE THAT -- THE MOSQUE OR THE CENTER RATHER ARE OF THE SAME CLOTH.

CENTER RATHER ARE OF THE SAME CLOTH.

BUT THE FACT IS -- CLOTH.

BUT THE FACT IS -- >> THOSE TERRORISTS -- BUT THE FACT IS -- >> THOSE TERRORISTS -- >> THEY TERRORIZE MUSLIMS AS >> THOSE TERRORISTS -- >> THEY TERRORIZE MUSLIMS AS WELL.

>> THEY TERRORIZE MUSLIMS AS WELL.

>> YOU'RE LUMPING ALL -- WELL.

>> YOU'RE LUMPING ALL -- >> THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO DIED >> YOU'RE LUMPING ALL -- >> THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO DIED ON 9/11.

>> THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO DIED ON 9/11.

[ ALL TALKING AT ONCE ] ON 9/11.

[ ALL TALKING AT ONCE ] >> LOT MORE HISTORY ABOUT THE [ ALL TALKING AT ONCE ] >> LOT MORE HISTORY ABOUT THE BIBLE THAN THERE IS ABOUT -- >> LOT MORE HISTORY ABOUT THE BIBLE THAN THERE IS ABOUT -- >> MAYBE THE QUESTION OUGHT TO BIBLE THAN THERE IS ABOUT -- >> MAYBE THE QUESTION OUGHT TO BE, SHOULD WE HAVE SOME TYPE OF >> MAYBE THE QUESTION OUGHT TO BE, SHOULD WE HAVE SOME TYPE OF COMPREHENSIVE POLICY OF HOW BE, SHOULD WE HAVE SOME TYPE OF COMPREHENSIVE POLICY OF HOW CLOSE RELIGIOUS SPACE IS TO, COMPREHENSIVE POLICY OF HOW CLOSE RELIGIOUS SPACE IS TO, INSTITUTIONS, OR MUSEUMS CAN BE CLOSE RELIGIOUS SPACE IS TO, INSTITUTIONS, OR MUSEUMS CAN BE TO THE NATIONAL MALL AND MAYBE INSTITUTIONS, OR MUSEUMS CAN BE TO THE NATIONAL MALL AND MAYBE THAT'S THE QUESTION THAT NEEDS TO THE NATIONAL MALL AND MAYBE THAT'S THE QUESTION THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED AND THAT WOULD THAT'S THE QUESTION THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED AND THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING FOR CONGRESS TO TO BE ADDRESSED AND THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING FOR CONGRESS TO LOOK AT.

BE SOMETHING FOR CONGRESS TO LOOK AT.

>> ALL RIGHT.

LOOK AT.

>> ALL RIGHT.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: >> ALL RIGHT.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: FEMALE MUTILATION OR FGM IS AN BEHIND THE HEADLINES: FEMALE MUTILATION OR FGM IS AN AMERICAN PROBLEM.

FEMALE MUTILATION OR FGM IS AN AMERICAN PROBLEM.

ACTIVISTS SAY IT HAPPENS IN THE AMERICAN PROBLEM.

ACTIVISTS SAY IT HAPPENS IN THE UNITED STATES.

ACTIVISTS SAY IT HAPPENS IN THE UNITED STATES.

BUT MORE OFTEN YOUNG GIRLS UNITED STATES.

BUT MORE OFTEN YOUNG GIRLS LIVING HERE ARE TRICKED BY THEIR BUT MORE OFTEN YOUNG GIRLS LIVING HERE ARE TRICKED BY THEIR FAMILIES INTO SUMMER VACATIONS LIVING HERE ARE TRICKED BY THEIR FAMILIES INTO SUMMER VACATIONS ABROAD TO UNDERGO THE PROCEDURE FAMILIES INTO SUMMER VACATIONS ABROAD TO UNDERGO THE PROCEDURE KNOWN AS VACATION CUTTING.

ABROAD TO UNDERGO THE PROCEDURE KNOWN AS VACATION CUTTING.

>> THESE KIDS ARE INNOCENT, KNOWN AS VACATION CUTTING.

>> THESE KIDS ARE INNOCENT, THEY'RE YOUR AVERAGE AMERICAN >> THESE KIDS ARE INNOCENT, THEY'RE YOUR AVERAGE AMERICAN TEENAGERS.

THEY'RE YOUR AVERAGE AMERICAN TEENAGERS.

SOMETIMES YOUNGER THAN TEENAGERS.

SOMETIMES YOUNGER THAN TEENAGERS.

SOMETIMES YOUNGER THAN TEENAGERS.

AND YOU KNOW THEY GO BACK AND TEENAGERS.

AND YOU KNOW THEY GO BACK AND EXPERIENCE THIS AND THEN THEY AND YOU KNOW THEY GO BACK AND EXPERIENCE THIS AND THEN THEY COME BACK TO FACE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE THIS AND THEN THEY COME BACK TO FACE AMERICAN TEENS.

COME BACK TO FACE AMERICAN TEENS.

THEIR FRIENDS AT SCHOOL, PEOPLE TEENS.

THEIR FRIENDS AT SCHOOL, PEOPLE THAT CAN'T UNDERSTAND.

THEIR FRIENDS AT SCHOOL, PEOPLE THAT CAN'T UNDERSTAND.

EVEN IF THEY TRY TO EXPLAIN.

THAT CAN'T UNDERSTAND.

EVEN IF THEY TRY TO EXPLAIN.

IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT YOU EVEN IF THEY TRY TO EXPLAIN.

IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN'T TALK ABOUT; YOUR LIFE IS IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN'T TALK ABOUT; YOUR LIFE IS CHANGED FOREVER.

CAN'T TALK ABOUT; YOUR LIFE IS CHANGED FOREVER.

>> THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CHANGED FOREVER.

>> THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DEFINES FEMALE GENITAL >> THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DEFINES FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION AS THE PARTIAL OR DEFINES FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION AS THE PARTIAL OR TOTAL REMOVAL OF, OR INJURY TO, MUTILATION AS THE PARTIAL OR TOTAL REMOVAL OF, OR INJURY TO, THE FEMALE GENITALIA FOR TOTAL REMOVAL OF, OR INJURY TO, THE FEMALE GENITALIA FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS.

THE FEMALE GENITALIA FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS.

AS A ONE-WEEK-OLD BABY IN NON-MEDICAL REASONS.

AS A ONE-WEEK-OLD BABY IN GAMBIA, JAHA DUKUREH WAS AS A ONE-WEEK-OLD BABY IN GAMBIA, JAHA DUKUREH WAS SUBJECTED TO FGM.

GAMBIA, JAHA DUKUREH WAS SUBJECTED TO FGM.

NOW, AN AMERICAN CITIZEN, SUBJECTED TO FGM.

NOW, AN AMERICAN CITIZEN, DUKUREH USES HER EXPERIENCE TO NOW, AN AMERICAN CITIZEN, DUKUREH USES HER EXPERIENCE TO RAISE AWARENESS OF THE BARBARIC DUKUREH USES HER EXPERIENCE TO RAISE AWARENESS OF THE BARBARIC PRACTICE.

RAISE AWARENESS OF THE BARBARIC PRACTICE.

>> GROWING UP AND COMING TO PRACTICE.

>> GROWING UP AND COMING TO AMERICA AND >> GROWING UP AND COMING TO AMERICA AND DISCOVERING ALL THE FREEDOMS AMERICA AND DISCOVERING ALL THE FREEDOMS THAT WE HAVE IN THIS COUNTRY AND DISCOVERING ALL THE FREEDOMS THAT WE HAVE IN THIS COUNTRY AND ALL THE LIBERTIES.

THAT WE HAVE IN THIS COUNTRY AND ALL THE LIBERTIES.

MADE ME REALIZE JUST ALL THE LIBERTIES.

MADE ME REALIZE JUST HOW HORRIFIC THIS PRACTICE IS MADE ME REALIZE JUST HOW HORRIFIC THIS PRACTICE IS AND WHY WE NEED TO END IT.

HOW HORRIFIC THIS PRACTICE IS AND WHY WE NEED TO END IT.

>> THE UNITED NATIONS HAS AND WHY WE NEED TO END IT.

>> THE UNITED NATIONS HAS DECLARED THE PRACTICE A HUMAN >> THE UNITED NATIONS HAS DECLARED THE PRACTICE A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION.

DECLARED THE PRACTICE A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION.

IT'S BEEN FEDERALLY OUTLAWED IN RIGHTS VIOLATION.

IT'S BEEN FEDERALLY OUTLAWED IN THE U.S.

SINCE 1996 AND LAST IT'S BEEN FEDERALLY OUTLAWED IN THE U.S.

SINCE 1996 AND LAST YEAR "VACATION CUTTING" BECAME THE U.S.

SINCE 1996 AND LAST YEAR "VACATION CUTTING" BECAME ILLEGAL UNDER THE NATIONAL YEAR "VACATION CUTTING" BECAME ILLEGAL UNDER THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT.

ILLEGAL UNDER THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT.

BUT A LACK OF ENFORCEMENT AND DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT.

BUT A LACK OF ENFORCEMENT AND ATTACHMENT TO CULTURAL BUT A LACK OF ENFORCEMENT AND ATTACHMENT TO CULTURAL TRADITIONS LEAVE AT LEAST ATTACHMENT TO CULTURAL TRADITIONS LEAVE AT LEAST 228,000 AMERICAN WOMEN AND GIRLS TRADITIONS LEAVE AT LEAST 228,000 AMERICAN WOMEN AND GIRLS WITH OR AT RISK OF FGM ACCORDING 228,000 AMERICAN WOMEN AND GIRLS WITH OR AT RISK OF FGM ACCORDING TO THE 2000 U.S. CENSUS.

WITH OR AT RISK OF FGM ACCORDING TO THE 2000 U.S. CENSUS.

>> IN OUR CULTURE VIRGINITY IS TO THE 2000 U.S. CENSUS.

>> IN OUR CULTURE VIRGINITY IS VERY IMPORTANT AND WHEN WE GO >> IN OUR CULTURE VIRGINITY IS VERY IMPORTANT AND WHEN WE GO THROUGH FGM PARENTS THINK VERY IMPORTANT AND WHEN WE GO THROUGH FGM PARENTS THINK THEY'RE ACTUALLY DOING US A THROUGH FGM PARENTS THINK THEY'RE ACTUALLY DOING US A FAVOR BECAUSE SOMETIMES FGM IS A THEY'RE ACTUALLY DOING US A FAVOR BECAUSE SOMETIMES FGM IS A CONDITION FOR MARRIAGE.

FAVOR BECAUSE SOMETIMES FGM IS A CONDITION FOR MARRIAGE.

IF YOU DIDN'T GO THROUGH FGM NO CONDITION FOR MARRIAGE.

IF YOU DIDN'T GO THROUGH FGM NO ONE WOULD REALLY WANT TO MARRY IF YOU DIDN'T GO THROUGH FGM NO ONE WOULD REALLY WANT TO MARRY YOU AND SOMETIMES IT ENSURES ONE WOULD REALLY WANT TO MARRY YOU AND SOMETIMES IT ENSURES YOUR VIRGINITY UNTIL MARRIAGE YOU AND SOMETIMES IT ENSURES YOUR VIRGINITY UNTIL MARRIAGE BECAUSE THE FACT THAT YOU DON'T YOUR VIRGINITY UNTIL MARRIAGE BECAUSE THE FACT THAT YOU DON'T DESIRE SEX.

BECAUSE THE FACT THAT YOU DON'T DESIRE SEX.

>> FGM IS MOST PREVALENT IN DESIRE SEX.

>> FGM IS MOST PREVALENT IN AFRICA, THE MIDDLE EAST AND >> FGM IS MOST PREVALENT IN AFRICA, THE MIDDLE EAST AND WESTERN ASIA.

AFRICA, THE MIDDLE EAST AND WESTERN ASIA.

AT LEAST 8,000 GIRLS ARE WESTERN ASIA.

AT LEAST 8,000 GIRLS ARE MUTILATED DAILY WORLDWIDE.

AT LEAST 8,000 GIRLS ARE MUTILATED DAILY WORLDWIDE.

ACTIVISTS AGAINST FGM SAY IT MUTILATED DAILY WORLDWIDE.

ACTIVISTS AGAINST FGM SAY IT TAKES PLACE ON U.S.

SOIL AMONG ACTIVISTS AGAINST FGM SAY IT TAKES PLACE ON U.S.

SOIL AMONG ILLEGAL, UNDOCUMENTED TAKES PLACE ON U.S.

SOIL AMONG ILLEGAL, UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS.

ILLEGAL, UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS.

>> NORMALLY IT'S NOT DONE BY IMMIGRANTS.

>> NORMALLY IT'S NOT DONE BY DOCTORS AND THE INSTRUMENTS THAT >> NORMALLY IT'S NOT DONE BY DOCTORS AND THE INSTRUMENTS THAT ARE USED ARE NOT STERILIZED, IT DOCTORS AND THE INSTRUMENTS THAT ARE USED ARE NOT STERILIZED, IT SOMETIMES USED ON A NUMBER OF ARE USED ARE NOT STERILIZED, IT SOMETIMES USED ON A NUMBER OF PEOPLE AND IN CASES LIKE THAT IT SOMETIMES USED ON A NUMBER OF PEOPLE AND IN CASES LIKE THAT IT CAN LEAD TO STDS AND ALSO PEOPLE AND IN CASES LIKE THAT IT CAN LEAD TO STDS AND ALSO INFECTIONS AND A LOT OF OTHER CAN LEAD TO STDS AND ALSO INFECTIONS AND A LOT OF OTHER HEALTH ISSUES EVEN AFTER YOU INFECTIONS AND A LOT OF OTHER HEALTH ISSUES EVEN AFTER YOU GROW UP.

HEALTH ISSUES EVEN AFTER YOU GROW UP.

>> DUKUREH JOINED EQUALITY NOW GROW UP.

>> DUKUREH JOINED EQUALITY NOW AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF >> DUKUREH JOINED EQUALITY NOW AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO HIGHLIGHT THE AND MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO HIGHLIGHT THE PROBLEM OF FGM IN THE UNITED REPRESENTATIVES TO HIGHLIGHT THE PROBLEM OF FGM IN THE UNITED STATES AND CALL FOR ACTION.

PROBLEM OF FGM IN THE UNITED STATES AND CALL FOR ACTION.

>> THINK OF A YOUNG GIRL GOING STATES AND CALL FOR ACTION.

>> THINK OF A YOUNG GIRL GOING THROUGH THIS >> THINK OF A YOUNG GIRL GOING THROUGH THIS UNKNOWINGLY OR WITHOUT HER THROUGH THIS UNKNOWINGLY OR WITHOUT HER PERMISSION TO IN ESSENCE CHANGE UNKNOWINGLY OR WITHOUT HER PERMISSION TO IN ESSENCE CHANGE HER LIFE FOREVER.

PERMISSION TO IN ESSENCE CHANGE HER LIFE FOREVER.

IT IS SAID THAT FGM IS TO HER LIFE FOREVER.

IT IS SAID THAT FGM IS TO PRESERVE THE VIRGINITY OF THESE IT IS SAID THAT FGM IS TO PRESERVE THE VIRGINITY OF THESE GIRLS AND TO KEEP THEM PURE PRESERVE THE VIRGINITY OF THESE GIRLS AND TO KEEP THEM PURE UNTIL MARRIAGE BUT IT IS REALLY GIRLS AND TO KEEP THEM PURE UNTIL MARRIAGE BUT IT IS REALLY TAKING THEIR SPIRIT AWAY.

UNTIL MARRIAGE BUT IT IS REALLY TAKING THEIR SPIRIT AWAY.

THEIR LIFE AWAY IF YOU WILL.

TAKING THEIR SPIRIT AWAY.

THEIR LIFE AWAY IF YOU WILL.

AND THEIR DECISION AWAY.

THEIR LIFE AWAY IF YOU WILL.

AND THEIR DECISION AWAY.

>> REPRESENTATIVES SHEILA AND THEIR DECISION AWAY.

>> REPRESENTATIVES SHEILA JACKSON LEE AND JOSEPH CROWLEY >> REPRESENTATIVES SHEILA JACKSON LEE AND JOSEPH CROWLEY ARE LOBBYING OTHER LAWMAKERS AND JACKSON LEE AND JOSEPH CROWLEY ARE LOBBYING OTHER LAWMAKERS AND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO ARE LOBBYING OTHER LAWMAKERS AND THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO ORGANIZE A NATIONAL ACTION PLAN THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO ORGANIZE A NATIONAL ACTION PLAN THAT WILL END FGM IN THE U.S. ORGANIZE A NATIONAL ACTION PLAN THAT WILL END FGM IN THE U.S.

WITHIN A GENERATION.

THAT WILL END FGM IN THE U.S.

WITHIN A GENERATION.

>> WE NEED TO ALERT EDUCATORS WITHIN A GENERATION.

>> WE NEED TO ALERT EDUCATORS AND COUNSELORS HOW TO LOOK FOR >> WE NEED TO ALERT EDUCATORS AND COUNSELORS HOW TO LOOK FOR GIRLS AT RISK AND WHAT TO DO AND COUNSELORS HOW TO LOOK FOR GIRLS AT RISK AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT THAT.

GIRLS AT RISK AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT THAT.

WE WANT TO EXPLORE A NATIONAL ABOUT THAT.

WE WANT TO EXPLORE A NATIONAL HOTLINE SO PEOPLE WHO KNOW GIRLS WE WANT TO EXPLORE A NATIONAL HOTLINE SO PEOPLE WHO KNOW GIRLS WHO ARE AT RISK CAN CALL IN AND HOTLINE SO PEOPLE WHO KNOW GIRLS WHO ARE AT RISK CAN CALL IN AND FIND OUT HOW THEY CAN APPROACH WHO ARE AT RISK CAN CALL IN AND FIND OUT HOW THEY CAN APPROACH THIS SENSITIVE ISSUE.

FIND OUT HOW THEY CAN APPROACH THIS SENSITIVE ISSUE.

WE WANT HHS TO CARRY OUT A STUDY THIS SENSITIVE ISSUE.

WE WANT HHS TO CARRY OUT A STUDY OF HOW MANY GIRLS HERE IN THE WE WANT HHS TO CARRY OUT A STUDY OF HOW MANY GIRLS HERE IN THE UNITED STATES ARE EXPOSED TO THE OF HOW MANY GIRLS HERE IN THE UNITED STATES ARE EXPOSED TO THE RISK.

UNITED STATES ARE EXPOSED TO THE RISK.

>> DUKUREH SAYS THE MOST RECENT RISK.

>> DUKUREH SAYS THE MOST RECENT RESEARCH IS MORE THAN A DECADE >> DUKUREH SAYS THE MOST RECENT RESEARCH IS MORE THAN A DECADE OLD, AND NEEDS TO BE UPDATED.

RESEARCH IS MORE THAN A DECADE OLD, AND NEEDS TO BE UPDATED.

SO SHE'S STARTED A PETITION OLD, AND NEEDS TO BE UPDATED.

SO SHE'S STARTED A PETITION DRIVE TO SPARK GOVERNMENT SO SHE'S STARTED A PETITION DRIVE TO SPARK GOVERNMENT ACTION.

DRIVE TO SPARK GOVERNMENT ACTION.

>> WE'RE NOT GIVING UP ON THIS ACTION.

>> WE'RE NOT GIVING UP ON THIS PETITION, WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY >> WE'RE NOT GIVING UP ON THIS PETITION, WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY UNTIL THEY RESPOND TO IT.

PETITION, WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY UNTIL THEY RESPOND TO IT.

EVEN IF IT TAKES A MILLION UNTIL THEY RESPOND TO IT.

EVEN IF IT TAKES A MILLION SIGNATURES WE ARE GOING TO WAIT EVEN IF IT TAKES A MILLION SIGNATURES WE ARE GOING TO WAIT FOR THAT DAY WHEN AMERICA SIGNATURES WE ARE GOING TO WAIT FOR THAT DAY WHEN AMERICA RECOGNIZES FGM AS AN AMERICAN FOR THAT DAY WHEN AMERICA RECOGNIZES FGM AS AN AMERICAN PROBLEM.

RECOGNIZES FGM AS AN AMERICAN PROBLEM.

>> SO, HOW IS THE U.S.

SUPPOSED PROBLEM.

>> SO, HOW IS THE U.S.

SUPPOSED TO DEAL WITH THIS?

>> SO, HOW IS THE U.S.

SUPPOSED TO DEAL WITH THIS?

HONESTLY ALL I CAN THINK OF IS TO DEAL WITH THIS?

HONESTLY ALL I CAN THINK OF IS SCREENING PEOPLE WHO COME IN TO HONESTLY ALL I CAN THINK OF IS SCREENING PEOPLE WHO COME IN TO THIS COUNTRY WHICH WOULD BE AN SCREENING PEOPLE WHO COME IN TO THIS COUNTRY WHICH WOULD BE AN INTRUSIVE KIND OF QUESTIONING THIS COUNTRY WHICH WOULD BE AN INTRUSIVE KIND OF QUESTIONING THAT WOULD GO ON AND PHYSICAL INTRUSIVE KIND OF QUESTIONING THAT WOULD GO ON AND PHYSICAL EXAM AND IF YOU HAVE BEEN OR YOU THAT WOULD GO ON AND PHYSICAL EXAM AND IF YOU HAVE BEEN OR YOU CAN'T COME HERE IF YOU ENGAGE IN EXAM AND IF YOU HAVE BEEN OR YOU CAN'T COME HERE IF YOU ENGAGE IN THIS HORRENDOUS PRACTICE.

CAN'T COME HERE IF YOU ENGAGE IN THIS HORRENDOUS PRACTICE.

>> WE HAVE TO START WITH KNOWING THIS HORRENDOUS PRACTICE.

>> WE HAVE TO START WITH KNOWING WHAT TO LOOK FOR.

>> WE HAVE TO START WITH KNOWING WHAT TO LOOK FOR.

I'VE WORKED ON THIS ISSUE SO WHAT TO LOOK FOR.

I'VE WORKED ON THIS ISSUE SO LONG IN MY CAREER NOW HAVING TO I'VE WORKED ON THIS ISSUE SO LONG IN MY CAREER NOW HAVING TO UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S HAPPENING LONG IN MY CAREER NOW HAVING TO UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S HAPPENING IN AMERICA, WE HAVE TO CHANGE UNDERSTAND THAT IT'S HAPPENING IN AMERICA, WE HAVE TO CHANGE OUR APPROACH, MUCH LIKE SEX IN AMERICA, WE HAVE TO CHANGE OUR APPROACH, MUCH LIKE SEX TRAFFICKING, VIEWING IT AS THIS OUR APPROACH, MUCH LIKE SEX TRAFFICKING, VIEWING IT AS THIS PROBLEM THAT HAPPENS IN FAR-AWAY TRAFFICKING, VIEWING IT AS THIS PROBLEM THAT HAPPENS IN FAR-AWAY COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL PROBLEM THAT HAPPENS IN FAR-AWAY COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL ISSUE TO REALLY DOMESTIC ONE COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL ISSUE TO REALLY DOMESTIC ONE THAT IS HAPPENING TO AMERICAN ISSUE TO REALLY DOMESTIC ONE THAT IS HAPPENING TO AMERICAN WOMEN AND GIRLS AND WE REALLY THAT IS HAPPENING TO AMERICAN WOMEN AND GIRLS AND WE REALLY HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT VIOLENCE WOMEN AND GIRLS AND WE REALLY HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN KNOWS NO BORDER.

HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN KNOWS NO BORDER.

>> I MEAN, IT'S ALREADY AGAINST AGAINST WOMEN KNOWS NO BORDER.

>> I MEAN, IT'S ALREADY AGAINST THE LAW, VACATION CUTS AGAINST >> I MEAN, IT'S ALREADY AGAINST THE LAW, VACATION CUTS AGAINST THE LAW.

THE LAW, VACATION CUTS AGAINST THE LAW.

WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP TO FORCE THE LAW.

WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP TO FORCE THOSE LAWS?

WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP TO FORCE THOSE LAWS?

>> THE GIRLS HAVE TO KNOW THAT THOSE LAWS?

>> THE GIRLS HAVE TO KNOW THAT THEY CAN GO SOME, WHERE RIGHT?

>> THE GIRLS HAVE TO KNOW THAT THEY CAN GO SOME, WHERE RIGHT?

VACATION CUTTING, THE SUMMERTIME THEY CAN GO SOME, WHERE RIGHT?

VACATION CUTTING, THE SUMMERTIME THAT THEY GO IS KNOWN AS CUTTING VACATION CUTTING, THE SUMMERTIME THAT THEY GO IS KNOWN AS CUTTING SEASON.

THAT THEY GO IS KNOWN AS CUTTING SEASON.

IF THE GIRLS KNOW THAT THEY GO SEASON.

IF THE GIRLS KNOW THAT THEY GO SOMEWHERE HERE TO GET HELP THEY IF THE GIRLS KNOW THAT THEY GO SOMEWHERE HERE TO GET HELP THEY NEED TO ALERT THE AUTHORITIES SOMEWHERE HERE TO GET HELP THEY NEED TO ALERT THE AUTHORITIES BEFORE THEY GET ON THAT PLANE, NEED TO ALERT THE AUTHORITIES BEFORE THEY GET ON THAT PLANE, BEFORE THEY'RE OVERSEAS.

BEFORE THEY GET ON THAT PLANE, BEFORE THEY'RE OVERSEAS.

THE RIGHTS THAT -- BEFORE THEY'RE OVERSEAS.

THE RIGHTS THAT -- >> HOW CAN YOU GET THEM TO ALERT THE RIGHTS THAT -- >> HOW CAN YOU GET THEM TO ALERT THE AUTHORITIES?

>> HOW CAN YOU GET THEM TO ALERT THE AUTHORITIES?

>> I'M JUST TAKING TO ME IT'S A THE AUTHORITIES?

>> I'M JUST TAKING TO ME IT'S A PROBLEM SORT OF WITHOUT A >> I'M JUST TAKING TO ME IT'S A PROBLEM SORT OF WITHOUT A SOLUTION UNLESS WE WANT TO GET PROBLEM SORT OF WITHOUT A SOLUTION UNLESS WE WANT TO GET REALLY INVASIVE IN TERMS OF WHOM SOLUTION UNLESS WE WANT TO GET REALLY INVASIVE IN TERMS OF WHOM WE ALLOW IN TO THIS COUNTRY.

REALLY INVASIVE IN TERMS OF WHOM WE ALLOW IN TO THIS COUNTRY.

>> MAYBE IT'S NOT SUCH A BAD WE ALLOW IN TO THIS COUNTRY.

>> MAYBE IT'S NOT SUCH A BAD IDEA THEN IN THE INITIAL PERIOD >> MAYBE IT'S NOT SUCH A BAD IDEA THEN IN THE INITIAL PERIOD WHERE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IDEA THEN IN THE INITIAL PERIOD WHERE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT SCREENING THE PEOPLE COMING WHERE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT SCREENING THE PEOPLE COMING THROUGH IMMIGRATION.

SCREENING THE PEOPLE COMING THROUGH IMMIGRATION.

WHATEVER STEPS WE HAVE TO TAKE.

THROUGH IMMIGRATION.

WHATEVER STEPS WE HAVE TO TAKE.

I HAVE NO IDEA.

WHATEVER STEPS WE HAVE TO TAKE.

I HAVE NO IDEA.

>> WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT A LOT I HAVE NO IDEA.

>> WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT A LOT OF GIRLS THAT WOMEN AND GIRLS >> WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT A LOT OF GIRLS THAT WOMEN AND GIRLS THAT WE'VE WORKED WITH THEY'RE OF GIRLS THAT WOMEN AND GIRLS THAT WE'VE WORKED WITH THEY'RE NOT EVEN -- THEY ARE CUT BY THAT WE'VE WORKED WITH THEY'RE NOT EVEN -- THEY ARE CUT BY BLADES THAT ARE UNSTERILE, THIS NOT EVEN -- THEY ARE CUT BY BLADES THAT ARE UNSTERILE, THIS CAN GIVE YOU LONG-TERM REPROCEED BLADES THAT ARE UNSTERILE, THIS CAN GIVE YOU LONG-TERM REPROCEED DICKTIVE HEALTH -- CAN GIVE YOU LONG-TERM REPROCEED DICKTIVE HEALTH -- >> IT'S AN ISSUE OF EDUCATION.

DICKTIVE HEALTH -- >> IT'S AN ISSUE OF EDUCATION.

NOBODY BUT UNEDUCATED PARENT IS >> IT'S AN ISSUE OF EDUCATION.

NOBODY BUT UNEDUCATED PARENT IS GOING TO LET A CHILD GO THROUGH NOBODY BUT UNEDUCATED PARENT IS GOING TO LET A CHILD GO THROUGH THIS.

GOING TO LET A CHILD GO THROUGH THIS.

>> LET ME JUST SAY THIS, THIS IS THIS.

>> LET ME JUST SAY THIS, THIS IS MORE LONG TERM, BUT HAVING BEEN >> LET ME JUST SAY THIS, THIS IS MORE LONG TERM, BUT HAVING BEEN TO ETHIOPIA -- ETHIOPIA, I MET MORE LONG TERM, BUT HAVING BEEN TO ETHIOPIA -- ETHIOPIA, I MET WITH THE DOCTOR WHO WIPED THIS TO ETHIOPIA -- ETHIOPIA, I MET WITH THE DOCTOR WHO WIPED THIS OUT IN SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA IT'S WITH THE DOCTOR WHO WIPED THIS OUT IN SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA IT'S THROUGH EDUCATION, NOW WHAT'S OUT IN SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA IT'S THROUGH EDUCATION, NOW WHAT'S HAPPENING THERE IS UNFORTUNATELY THROUGH EDUCATION, NOW WHAT'S HAPPENING THERE IS UNFORTUNATELY THE GIRLS WHO WERE CUT ARE NO HAPPENING THERE IS UNFORTUNATELY THE GIRLS WHO WERE CUT ARE NO LONGER DESIRABLE AS WIVES THE GIRLS WHO WERE CUT ARE NO LONGER DESIRABLE AS WIVES BECAUSE MEN FOUND THAT THE WOMEN LONGER DESIRABLE AS WIVES BECAUSE MEN FOUND THAT THE WOMEN WERE NOT CUT WANT TO HAVE SEX BECAUSE MEN FOUND THAT THE WOMEN WERE NOT CUT WANT TO HAVE SEX MORE OFTEN BECAUSE IT'S PLESHAL.

WERE NOT CUT WANT TO HAVE SEX MORE OFTEN BECAUSE IT'S PLESHAL.

THEY EDUCATED, IT'S NOT EASIER MORE OFTEN BECAUSE IT'S PLESHAL.

THEY EDUCATED, IT'S NOT EASIER FOR CHILD BIRTH WHICH IS ONE OF THEY EDUCATED, IT'S NOT EASIER FOR CHILD BIRTH WHICH IS ONE OF THE THINGS THEY THINK YOU'LL FOR CHILD BIRTH WHICH IS ONE OF THE THINGS THEY THINK YOU'LL HAVE EASIER CHILD BIRTH, ALSO, THE THINGS THEY THINK YOU'LL HAVE EASIER CHILD BIRTH, ALSO, WE HAVE TO EDUCATE, HAVE TO STEP HAVE EASIER CHILD BIRTH, ALSO, WE HAVE TO EDUCATE, HAVE TO STEP ON SOME TOES PEOPLE BACK OFF MY WE HAVE TO EDUCATE, HAVE TO STEP ON SOME TOES PEOPLE BACK OFF MY RELIGION, NOT IN THE UNITED ON SOME TOES PEOPLE BACK OFF MY RELIGION, NOT IN THE UNITED STATES.

RELIGION, NOT IN THE UNITED STATES.

>> YOU CAPTAIN -- STATES.

>> YOU CAPTAIN -- >> MUTILATION OF SOMEONE.

>> YOU CAPTAIN -- >> MUTILATION OF SOMEONE.

>> YOU CAN'T HIDE BEHIND >> MUTILATION OF SOMEONE.

>> YOU CAN'T HIDE BEHIND CRIMINAL ACTIVITY UNDER THIS >> YOU CAN'T HIDE BEHIND CRIMINAL ACTIVITY UNDER THIS VAIL OF CULTURAL.

CRIMINAL ACTIVITY UNDER THIS VAIL OF CULTURAL.

ALSO SHOWS HOW MUCH VALUE VAIL OF CULTURAL.

ALSO SHOWS HOW MUCH VALUE WOMEN'S VIRGINITY.

ALSO SHOWS HOW MUCH VALUE WOMEN'S VIRGINITY.

THIS IS WHAT WE NEED TO WOMEN'S VIRGINITY.

THIS IS WHAT WE NEED TO APPROACH.

THIS IS WHAT WE NEED TO APPROACH.

WOMEN'S SEXUALITY.

APPROACH.

WOMEN'S SEXUALITY.

>> ALL RIGHT.

WOMEN'S SEXUALITY.

>> ALL RIGHT.

THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION.

>> ALL RIGHT.

THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE, PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE, PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.

VISIT OUR WEBSITE, PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.

WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, "TO PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.

WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, "TO THE CONTRARY," SEE YOU NEXT WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, "TO THE CONTRARY," SEE YOU NEXT WEEK.