FOUNDATION.

FOUNDATION.

>> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE FOUNDATION.

>> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY" >> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY" FIRST, WORKING WOMEN VERSUS CONTRARY" FIRST, WORKING WOMEN VERSUS THEIR PARENTS ON THIS EQUAL PAY FIRST, WORKING WOMEN VERSUS THEIR PARENTS ON THIS EQUAL PAY DAY, THEN WOMEN CANDIDATES AND THEIR PARENTS ON THIS EQUAL PAY DAY, THEN WOMEN CANDIDATES AND THE SUPREME COURT RULING ON DAY, THEN WOMEN CANDIDATES AND THE SUPREME COURT RULING ON DONOR CAPS.

THE SUPREME COURT RULING ON DONOR CAPS.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: MODERN DONOR CAPS.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: MODERN TECHNOLOGY, IS IT SLAVERY OR BEHIND THE HEADLINES: MODERN TECHNOLOGY, IS IT SLAVERY OR EMPOWERMENT?

TECHNOLOGY, IS IT SLAVERY OR EMPOWERMENT?

HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

EMPOWERMENT?

HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST, A NEW TWIST TO A PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST, A NEW TWIST TO A LONGSTANDING ISSUE.

UP FIRST, A NEW TWIST TO A LONGSTANDING ISSUE.

WOMEN TODAY OUTEARN THEIR LONGSTANDING ISSUE.

WOMEN TODAY OUTEARN THEIR MOTHERS BUT NOT THEIR FATHERS.

WOMEN TODAY OUTEARN THEIR MOTHERS BUT NOT THEIR FATHERS.

70% OF MEN TODAY EARN MORE THAN MOTHERS BUT NOT THEIR FATHERS.

70% OF MEN TODAY EARN MORE THAN THEIR FATHERS.

70% OF MEN TODAY EARN MORE THAN THEIR FATHERS.

INFORMATION COMES FROM A NEW PEW THEIR FATHERS.

INFORMATION COMES FROM A NEW PEW REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC MOBILITY INFORMATION COMES FROM A NEW PEW REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC MOBILITY OF WOMEN COMPARED WITH THEIR REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC MOBILITY OF WOMEN COMPARED WITH THEIR PARENTS.

OF WOMEN COMPARED WITH THEIR PARENTS.

THE STUDY FINDS DAUGHTERS OF PARENTS.

THE STUDY FINDS DAUGHTERS OF WORKING MOMS ARE MORE LIKELY TO THE STUDY FINDS DAUGHTERS OF WORKING MOMS ARE MORE LIKELY TO BECOME WORKING WOMEN THEMSELVES.

WORKING MOMS ARE MORE LIKELY TO BECOME WORKING WOMEN THEMSELVES.

BUT THE PART THAT CAUGHT OUR BECOME WORKING WOMEN THEMSELVES.

BUT THE PART THAT CAUGHT OUR ATTENTION WAS DAUGHTERS OF WOMEN BUT THE PART THAT CAUGHT OUR ATTENTION WAS DAUGHTERS OF WOMEN WHO DID NOT WORK HAD THE HIGHEST ATTENTION WAS DAUGHTERS OF WOMEN WHO DID NOT WORK HAD THE HIGHEST FAMILY INCOME.

WHO DID NOT WORK HAD THE HIGHEST FAMILY INCOME.

IT'S NOT BECAUSE THESE GROWN FAMILY INCOME.

IT'S NOT BECAUSE THESE GROWN DAUGHTERS EARNED MORE MONEY; IT'S NOT BECAUSE THESE GROWN DAUGHTERS EARNED MORE MONEY; INSTEAD, THEY MARRIED HIGHER DAUGHTERS EARNED MORE MONEY; INSTEAD, THEY MARRIED HIGHER EARNING MEN.

INSTEAD, THEY MARRIED HIGHER EARNING MEN.

THE REPORT COMPARED WOMEN WHO EARNING MEN.

THE REPORT COMPARED WOMEN WHO TURNED 40 IN THE 60S OR 70S WITH THE REPORT COMPARED WOMEN WHO TURNED 40 IN THE 60S OR 70S WITH WOMEN WHO HIT THAT AGE AFTER THE TURNED 40 IN THE 60S OR 70S WITH WOMEN WHO HIT THAT AGE AFTER THE YEAR 2000.

WOMEN WHO HIT THAT AGE AFTER THE YEAR 2000.

THIS INFO COMES ON THE EVE OF YEAR 2000.

THIS INFO COMES ON THE EVE OF EQUAL PAY DAY.

THIS INFO COMES ON THE EVE OF EQUAL PAY DAY.

THE DATE, APRIL 8TH, SYMBOLIZES EQUAL PAY DAY.

THE DATE, APRIL 8TH, SYMBOLIZES HOW LONG WOMEN MUST WORK TO THE DATE, APRIL 8TH, SYMBOLIZES HOW LONG WOMEN MUST WORK TO MATCH MEN'S EARNINGS DURING THE HOW LONG WOMEN MUST WORK TO MATCH MEN'S EARNINGS DURING THE PREVIOUS YEAR.

MATCH MEN'S EARNINGS DURING THE PREVIOUS YEAR.

MEGAN BEYER PREVIOUS YEAR.

MEGAN BEYER HOW MUCH OF AN INFLUENCE ARE MEGAN BEYER HOW MUCH OF AN INFLUENCE ARE MOTHERS ON THEIR DAUGHTERS' HOW MUCH OF AN INFLUENCE ARE MOTHERS ON THEIR DAUGHTERS' EARNING.

MOTHERS ON THEIR DAUGHTERS' EARNING.

>> AS THE MOTHER OF MILLENNIALS EARNING.

>> AS THE MOTHER OF MILLENNIALS I'M NOT SURE BUT IT'S OUR FAULT.

>> AS THE MOTHER OF MILLENNIALS I'M NOT SURE BUT IT'S OUR FAULT.

I DON'T THINK THAT IT IS MOTHERS I'M NOT SURE BUT IT'S OUR FAULT.

I DON'T THINK THAT IT IS MOTHERS HAD AS MUCH TO DO WITH IT AS IT I DON'T THINK THAT IT IS MOTHERS HAD AS MUCH TO DO WITH IT AS IT HAS TO DID WITH TECHNOLOGICAL HAD AS MUCH TO DO WITH IT AS IT HAS TO DID WITH TECHNOLOGICAL AND SOCIETAL CHANGES THAT HAVE HAS TO DID WITH TECHNOLOGICAL AND SOCIETAL CHANGES THAT HAVE HAPPENED.

AND SOCIETAL CHANGES THAT HAVE HAPPENED.

>> I'M SURE.

HAPPENED.

>> I'M SURE.

THE MOMMA'S LOW PAY HAD >> I'M SURE.

THE MOMMA'S LOW PAY HAD ENCOURAGED YOUNG WOMEN TO TRY THE MOMMA'S LOW PAY HAD ENCOURAGED YOUNG WOMEN TO TRY DADDY'S LINE OF WORK.

ENCOURAGED YOUNG WOMEN TO TRY DADDY'S LINE OF WORK.

>> I DO THINK MOTHERS AND FARTS DADDY'S LINE OF WORK.

>> I DO THINK MOTHERS AND FARTS HAVE A HUGE INFLUENCE, I AM THE >> I DO THINK MOTHERS AND FARTS HAVE A HUGE INFLUENCE, I AM THE CHILD OF IMMIGRANTS I THINK MY HAVE A HUGE INFLUENCE, I AM THE CHILD OF IMMIGRANTS I THINK MY PARENTS SACRIFICES INSPIRES ME CHILD OF IMMIGRANTS I THINK MY PARENTS SACRIFICES INSPIRES ME TO WORK HARDER.

PARENTS SACRIFICES INSPIRES ME TO WORK HARDER.

>> BUT HOW COME AS IT TURNS OUT TO WORK HARDER.

>> BUT HOW COME AS IT TURNS OUT THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT THE >> BUT HOW COME AS IT TURNS OUT THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT THE MOTHERS -- THE DAUGHTERS RATHER THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT THE MOTHERS -- THE DAUGHTERS RATHER OF NONWORKING MOTHERS WHO MOTHERS -- THE DAUGHTERS RATHER OF NONWORKING MOTHERS WHO MARRIED WEALTHY MEN ARE MAKING OF NONWORKING MOTHERS WHO MARRIED WEALTHY MEN ARE MAKING MORE MONEY BY REPEATING THAT MARRIED WEALTHY MEN ARE MAKING MORE MONEY BY REPEATING THAT PATTERN THAN ARE WOMEN HA ARE -- MORE MONEY BY REPEATING THAT PATTERN THAN ARE WOMEN HA ARE -- >> THAT'S CAREER WOMEN.

PATTERN THAN ARE WOMEN HA ARE -- >> THAT'S CAREER WOMEN.

THAT SHOWS THE INFLUENCE OF >> THAT'S CAREER WOMEN.

THAT SHOWS THE INFLUENCE OF MOTHERS.

THAT SHOWS THE INFLUENCE OF MOTHERS.

THEY SAW THEIR MOTHERS DOING MOTHERS.

THEY SAW THEIR MOTHERS DOING WELL DOING NOTHING, EXCUSE ME.

THEY SAW THEIR MOTHERS DOING WELL DOING NOTHING, EXCUSE ME.

BUT DOING WELL BEING AT HOME.

WELL DOING NOTHING, EXCUSE ME.

BUT DOING WELL BEING AT HOME.

>> THEY'RE GOING TO -- GET BUT DOING WELL BEING AT HOME.

>> THEY'RE GOING TO -- GET REALLY UPSET, DOING NOTHING IN >> THEY'RE GOING TO -- GET REALLY UPSET, DOING NOTHING IN THE WORKPLACE.

REALLY UPSET, DOING NOTHING IN THE WORKPLACE.

>> STRIKE THAT.

THE WORKPLACE.

>> STRIKE THAT.

>> BUT THEY SAW THEIR MOTHERS >> STRIKE THAT.

>> BUT THEY SAW THEIR MOTHERS ABLE TO HAVE A LIFE AT HOME WITH >> BUT THEY SAW THEIR MOTHERS ABLE TO HAVE A LIFE AT HOME WITH THEM, WITH CHAIR CHILDREN.

ABLE TO HAVE A LIFE AT HOME WITH THEM, WITH CHAIR CHILDREN.

THEY LIKE THAT LIFE THAT'S A THEM, WITH CHAIR CHILDREN.

THEY LIKE THAT LIFE THAT'S A CARDINAL PRINCIPLE.

THEY LIKE THAT LIFE THAT'S A CARDINAL PRINCIPLE.

YOU OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE CARDINAL PRINCIPLE.

YOU OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE LIFE YOU WANT.

YOU OUGHT TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE LIFE YOU WANT.

IF YOU WANT TO GO OUT TO WORK LIFE YOU WANT.

IF YOU WANT TO GO OUT TO WORK THAT'S WHAT YOU DESERVE.

IF YOU WANT TO GO OUT TO WORK THAT'S WHAT YOU DESERVE.

THESE ARE WOMEN WHO LIKE THE THAT'S WHAT YOU DESERVE.

THESE ARE WOMEN WHO LIKE THE LIFE THEY HAD, THEY'RE PHYSICAL THESE ARE WOMEN WHO LIKE THE LIFE THEY HAD, THEY'RE PHYSICAL IN THE SAME PATTERN AND I DON'T LIFE THEY HAD, THEY'RE PHYSICAL IN THE SAME PATTERN AND I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH IT.

IN THE SAME PATTERN AND I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH IT.

>> AND DON'T YOU THINK IT'S A HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH IT.

>> AND DON'T YOU THINK IT'S A FUNCTION PERHAPS OF THE >> AND DON'T YOU THINK IT'S A FUNCTION PERHAPS OF THE DEMOGRAPHIC IN A FAMILY WHERE FUNCTION PERHAPS OF THE DEMOGRAPHIC IN A FAMILY WHERE THEY COULD SURVIVE ON A SINGLE DEMOGRAPHIC IN A FAMILY WHERE THEY COULD SURVIVE ON A SINGLE INCOME AND BROUGHT UP IN THAT THEY COULD SURVIVE ON A SINGLE INCOME AND BROUGHT UP IN THAT ENVIRONMENT.

INCOME AND BROUGHT UP IN THAT ENVIRONMENT.

IT COULD BE THAT YOU'RE BROUGHT ENVIRONMENT.

IT COULD BE THAT YOU'RE BROUGHT UP IN DEMOGRAPHIC WHERE YOU'RE IT COULD BE THAT YOU'RE BROUGHT UP IN DEMOGRAPHIC WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO MEET POTENTIAL SPOUSES UP IN DEMOGRAPHIC WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO MEET POTENTIAL SPOUSES WHO MIGHT ALSO BE ABLE TO DO GOING TO MEET POTENTIAL SPOUSES WHO MIGHT ALSO BE ABLE TO DO THAT.

WHO MIGHT ALSO BE ABLE TO DO THAT.

PRIVILEGED IN TERMS OF THAT.

PRIVILEGED IN TERMS OF EDUCATION, IN TERMS OF WHERE PRIVILEGED IN TERMS OF EDUCATION, IN TERMS OF WHERE YOU'RE BROUGHT UP EDUCATION, IN TERMS OF WHERE YOU'RE BROUGHT UP GEOGRAPHICALLY.

YOU'RE BROUGHT UP GEOGRAPHICALLY.

ALL OF THOSE THINGS CAN PLAY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY.

ALL OF THOSE THINGS CAN PLAY IN TO IT.

ALL OF THOSE THINGS CAN PLAY IN TO IT.

>> THAT'S CORRECT.

TO IT.

>> THAT'S CORRECT.

HIGHER EDUCATION IS SINGLE BEST >> THAT'S CORRECT.

HIGHER EDUCATION IS SINGLE BEST DETERMINATE OF HOW MUCH MONEY HIGHER EDUCATION IS SINGLE BEST DETERMINATE OF HOW MUCH MONEY YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE ALONG THE DETERMINATE OF HOW MUCH MONEY YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE ALONG THE LINE.

YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE ALONG THE LINE.

THIS.

LINE.

THIS.

>> THIS STUDY TURNS THAT ON THIS.

>> THIS STUDY TURNS THAT ON ITS HEAD.

>> THIS STUDY TURNS THAT ON ITS HEAD.

DOESN'T SAY THAT THE DAUGHTERS ITS HEAD.

DOESN'T SAY THAT THE DAUGHTERS OF MOTHERS WHO MARRIED WEALTHY DOESN'T SAY THAT THE DAUGHTERS OF MOTHERS WHO MARRIED WEALTHY MEN AND WHO MAY HAVE BEEN OF MOTHERS WHO MARRIED WEALTHY MEN AND WHO MAY HAVE BEEN WEALTHY THEMSELVES THROUGH MEN AND WHO MAY HAVE BEEN WEALTHY THEMSELVES THROUGH INHERITANCE BUT DAUGHTERS OF WEALTHY THEMSELVES THROUGH INHERITANCE BUT DAUGHTERS OF WOMEN WHO DID NOT WORK OUTSIDE INHERITANCE BUT DAUGHTERS OF WOMEN WHO DID NOT WORK OUTSIDE THE HOME ARE EARNING LESSOR EVEN WOMEN WHO DID NOT WORK OUTSIDE THE HOME ARE EARNING LESSOR EVEN IT DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER THE HOME ARE EARNING LESSOR EVEN IT DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER THEY'RE EDUCATED OR NOT ALTHOUGH IT DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER THEY'RE EDUCATED OR NOT ALTHOUGH YOU THINK THEY WOULD BE.

THEY'RE EDUCATED OR NOT ALTHOUGH YOU THINK THEY WOULD BE.

BUT THAT THEY REPEAT THIS YOU THINK THEY WOULD BE.

BUT THAT THEY REPEAT THIS PATTERN.

BUT THAT THEY REPEAT THIS PATTERN.

>> IN THE STUDY THEY TALK ABOUT PATTERN.

>> IN THE STUDY THEY TALK ABOUT EDUCATION ACTUALLY.

>> IN THE STUDY THEY TALK ABOUT EDUCATION ACTUALLY.

IT DID POINT OUT THAT THE WOMEN EDUCATION ACTUALLY.

IT DID POINT OUT THAT THE WOMEN WHO -- DAUGHTERS MAKING MORE NOW IT DID POINT OUT THAT THE WOMEN WHO -- DAUGHTERS MAKING MORE NOW WERE THE ONES WHO HAD A HIGHER WHO -- DAUGHTERS MAKING MORE NOW WERE THE ONES WHO HAD A HIGHER EDUCATION LEVEL AS WELL.

WERE THE ONES WHO HAD A HIGHER EDUCATION LEVEL AS WELL.

THEY WERE ALSO THE ONES WHO WERE EDUCATION LEVEL AS WELL.

THEY WERE ALSO THE ONES WHO WERE MORE LIKELY TO BE MARRIED TO MEN THEY WERE ALSO THE ONES WHO WERE MORE LIKELY TO BE MARRIED TO MEN WHO HAD HIGHER EDUCATION LEVELS MORE LIKELY TO BE MARRIED TO MEN WHO HAD HIGHER EDUCATION LEVELS AS WELL.

WHO HAD HIGHER EDUCATION LEVELS AS WELL.

I DO THINK THAT THE OPPORTUNITY AS WELL.

I DO THINK THAT THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO TO GOOD COLLEGES BECAUSE I DO THINK THAT THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO TO GOOD COLLEGES BECAUSE THEY CAME FROM HOMES WHERE THERE TO GO TO GOOD COLLEGES BECAUSE THEY CAME FROM HOMES WHERE THERE WAS MORE MONEY DID HELP WITH THEY CAME FROM HOMES WHERE THERE WAS MORE MONEY DID HELP WITH THAT.

WAS MORE MONEY DID HELP WITH THAT.

>> TELL ME ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE THAT.

>> TELL ME ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE AS THE DAUGHTER OF IMMIGRANTS, >> TELL ME ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE AS THE DAUGHTER OF IMMIGRANTS, HOW DID YOU GET IN TO POLITICAL AS THE DAUGHTER OF IMMIGRANTS, HOW DID YOU GET IN TO POLITICAL CONSULTING?

HOW DID YOU GET IN TO POLITICAL CONSULTING?

>> THAT'S A LONG STORY, IN THIS CONSULTING?

>> THAT'S A LONG STORY, IN THIS CONVERSATION, I GOT IN POLITICS >> THAT'S A LONG STORY, IN THIS CONVERSATION, I GOT IN POLITICS I WAS INSPIRED BY THE SACRIFICES CONVERSATION, I GOT IN POLITICS I WAS INSPIRED BY THE SACRIFICES THEY MADE.

I WAS INSPIRED BY THE SACRIFICES THEY MADE.

WE TALK ABOUT GIRLS MAKING MORE THEY MADE.

WE TALK ABOUT GIRLS MAKING MORE THAN THEIR MOTHERS, BIG THING WE WE TALK ABOUT GIRLS MAKING MORE THAN THEIR MOTHERS, BIG THING WE HAVE TOMORROW POWER GIRLS AND THAN THEIR MOTHERS, BIG THING WE HAVE TOMORROW POWER GIRLS AND ENCOURAGE THEM TO GO IN THE HAVE TOMORROW POWER GIRLS AND ENCOURAGE THEM TO GO IN THE FIELDS THAT TRADITIONALLY ARE ENCOURAGE THEM TO GO IN THE FIELDS THAT TRADITIONALLY ARE OCCUPIED BY MEN.

FIELDS THAT TRADITIONALLY ARE OCCUPIED BY MEN.

HAVE THE GET THEM MORE IN TO OCCUPIED BY MEN.

HAVE THE GET THEM MORE IN TO MATH AND SCIENCES AND HAVE THEM HAVE THE GET THEM MORE IN TO MATH AND SCIENCES AND HAVE THEM COMPETE FAR THESE JOBS.

MATH AND SCIENCES AND HAVE THEM COMPETE FAR THESE JOBS.

THE SILICON VALLEY, I COULD COMPETE FAR THESE JOBS.

THE SILICON VALLEY, I COULD COUNT IN MY HAND HOW MANY FEMALE THE SILICON VALLEY, I COULD COUNT IN MY HAND HOW MANY FEMALE ENGINEERS I MET HOW MANY HEADS COUNT IN MY HAND HOW MANY FEMALE ENGINEERS I MET HOW MANY HEADS OF START-UP COMPANIES THAT WERE ENGINEERS I MET HOW MANY HEADS OF START-UP COMPANIES THAT WERE WOMEN.

OF START-UP COMPANIES THAT WERE WOMEN.

WE NEED MORE OF THOSE KIND OF WOMEN.

WE NEED MORE OF THOSE KIND OF PEOPLE.

WE NEED MORE OF THOSE KIND OF PEOPLE.

WE HAVE TO EMPOWER THESE PEOPLE PEOPLE.

WE HAVE TO EMPOWER THESE PEOPLE TO FOLLOW THOSE JOBS BE AT THE WE HAVE TO EMPOWER THESE PEOPLE TO FOLLOW THOSE JOBS BE AT THE TOP LEVELS.

TO FOLLOW THOSE JOBS BE AT THE TOP LEVELS.

>> DO YOU THINK THAT IS WHAT IS TOP LEVELS.

>> DO YOU THINK THAT IS WHAT IS KEEPING US FROM -- FOR SO LONG >> DO YOU THINK THAT IS WHAT IS KEEPING US FROM -- FOR SO LONG FROM CLOSING THE PAY GAP?

KEEPING US FROM -- FOR SO LONG FROM CLOSING THE PAY GAP?

>> IT'S ONE.

FROM CLOSING THE PAY GAP?

>> IT'S ONE.

I THINK REALITY IS, WOMEN WE >> IT'S ONE.

I THINK REALITY IS, WOMEN WE HAVE MUCH BIGGER -- WE PUT I THINK REALITY IS, WOMEN WE HAVE MUCH BIGGER -- WE PUT AGAINST OURSELVES AND SOCIETY HAVE MUCH BIGGER -- WE PUT AGAINST OURSELVES AND SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY OF TAKING CARE OF AGAINST OURSELVES AND SOCIETY RESPONSIBILITY OF TAKING CARE OF FAMILIES, BE IT CHILDREN OR OUR RESPONSIBILITY OF TAKING CARE OF FAMILIES, BE IT CHILDREN OR OUR PARENTS AND THAT TRADITIONAL FAMILIES, BE IT CHILDREN OR OUR PARENTS AND THAT TRADITIONAL FALL UPON US.

PARENTS AND THAT TRADITIONAL FALL UPON US.

AND I HOPE THAT I HAVE GREAT FALL UPON US.

AND I HOPE THAT I HAVE GREAT PARTNER AND WE WILL MAKE AND I HOPE THAT I HAVE GREAT PARTNER AND WE WILL MAKE DECISIONS TOGETHER.

PARTNER AND WE WILL MAKE DECISIONS TOGETHER.

BUT THE REALITY IS A LOT OF DECISIONS TOGETHER.

BUT THE REALITY IS A LOT OF TIMES IT'S WOMEN THAT ARE MAKING BUT THE REALITY IS A LOT OF TIMES IT'S WOMEN THAT ARE MAKING THESE DECISIONS.

TIMES IT'S WOMEN THAT ARE MAKING THESE DECISIONS.

>> PART IS THE CULTURE.

THESE DECISIONS.

>> PART IS THE CULTURE.

OUR CORPORATIONS DON'T HAVE >> PART IS THE CULTURE.

OUR CORPORATIONS DON'T HAVE STIPENDED FOR CHILD CARE, PAID OUR CORPORATIONS DON'T HAVE STIPENDED FOR CHILD CARE, PAID MATERNITY LEGAL, MANY OF THEM.

STIPENDED FOR CHILD CARE, PAID MATERNITY LEGAL, MANY OF THEM.

OUR SOCIETY HAS NOT ADAPTED TO MATERNITY LEGAL, MANY OF THEM.

OUR SOCIETY HAS NOT ADAPTED TO RESPOND TO THIS DUAL INCOME OUR SOCIETY HAS NOT ADAPTED TO RESPOND TO THIS DUAL INCOME PARADIGM THAT WE NOW LIVE IN.

RESPOND TO THIS DUAL INCOME PARADIGM THAT WE NOW LIVE IN.

BACK IN THE '60S AND '70s IT PARADIGM THAT WE NOW LIVE IN.

BACK IN THE '60S AND '70s IT DIDN'T -- WE DIDN'T EXPECT IT TO BACK IN THE '60S AND '70s IT DIDN'T -- WE DIDN'T EXPECT IT TO BECAUSE THERE WEREN'T THAT MANY DIDN'T -- WE DIDN'T EXPECT IT TO BECAUSE THERE WEREN'T THAT MANY WOMEN IN THE LABOR FORCE.

BECAUSE THERE WEREN'T THAT MANY WOMEN IN THE LABOR FORCE.

WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE DRAMATIC WOMEN IN THE LABOR FORCE.

WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE DRAMATIC CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF WOMEN WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE DRAMATIC CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF WOMEN WHO ARE OUT WORKING AND THE CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF WOMEN WHO ARE OUT WORKING AND THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH OF ANY WHO ARE OUT WORKING AND THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH OF ANY RESPONSE COMING FROM GOVERNMENT DALLAS-FORT WORTH OF ANY RESPONSE COMING FROM GOVERNMENT IN TERMS OF PUBLIC POLICY LIKE RESPONSE COMING FROM GOVERNMENT IN TERMS OF PUBLIC POLICY LIKE PAID MATERNITY LEAVE OR IN TERMS OF PUBLIC POLICY LIKE PAID MATERNITY LEAVE OR COMPANIES ACCOMMODATING THIS.

PAID MATERNITY LEAVE OR COMPANIES ACCOMMODATING THIS.

IT'S AMAZING -- COMPANIES ACCOMMODATING THIS.

IT'S AMAZING -- >> LET ME GO BACK TO THAT, NOT IT'S AMAZING -- >> LET ME GO BACK TO THAT, NOT MAKING MORE THAN THEIR FATHERS.

>> LET ME GO BACK TO THAT, NOT MAKING MORE THAN THEIR FATHERS.

IS A VERY PREGNANT FACT THAT MAKING MORE THAN THEIR FATHERS.

IS A VERY PREGNANT FACT THAT MEANS THAT THEIR FATHER WAS A IS A VERY PREGNANT FACT THAT MEANS THAT THEIR FATHER WAS A FACTORY WORKER FOR A LAWYER OR MEANS THAT THEIR FATHER WAS A FACTORY WORKER FOR A LAWYER OR DOCTOR OR INDIAN CHIEF.

FACTORY WORKER FOR A LAWYER OR DOCTOR OR INDIAN CHIEF.

IN OTHER WORDS, YOUR FATHER DOCTOR OR INDIAN CHIEF.

IN OTHER WORDS, YOUR FATHER COULD HAVE BEEN A HIGHLY PAID IN OTHER WORDS, YOUR FATHER COULD HAVE BEEN A HIGHLY PAID PROFESSIONAL STILL NOT MAKING COULD HAVE BEEN A HIGHLY PAID PROFESSIONAL STILL NOT MAKING MORE THAN HE IS.

PROFESSIONAL STILL NOT MAKING MORE THAN HE IS.

YOUR FATHER COULD HAVE BEEN A MORE THAN HE IS.

YOUR FATHER COULD HAVE BEEN A LOW PAID WORKER.

YOUR FATHER COULD HAVE BEEN A LOW PAID WORKER.

STILL NOT MAKING MORE ON THE LOW PAID WORKER.

STILL NOT MAKING MORE ON THE AVERAGE THAN HE IS.

STILL NOT MAKING MORE ON THE AVERAGE THAN HE IS.

IT DOES SHOW YOU THAT THE PAY AVERAGE THAN HE IS.

IT DOES SHOW YOU THAT THE PAY GAP PROBLEM IS ACROSS THE BOARD IT DOES SHOW YOU THAT THE PAY GAP PROBLEM IS ACROSS THE BOARD EVEN FOR WOMEN WHO GET EDUCATION GAP PROBLEM IS ACROSS THE BOARD EVEN FOR WOMEN WHO GET EDUCATION THEY ARE NOT -- EVEN FOR WOMEN WHO GET EDUCATION THEY ARE NOT -- >> I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF TALK THEY ARE NOT -- >> I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF TALK ABOUT LACK OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT >> I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF TALK ABOUT LACK OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT AND THAT SOME OTHER WESTERN ABOUT LACK OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT AND THAT SOME OTHER WESTERN COUNTRIES HAVE BUT A LOT OF AND THAT SOME OTHER WESTERN COUNTRIES HAVE BUT A LOT OF WOMEN ARE ENTREPRENEURS.

COUNTRIES HAVE BUT A LOT OF WOMEN ARE ENTREPRENEURS.

AND ONE THING ABOUT BECOMING AN WOMEN ARE ENTREPRENEURS.

AND ONE THING ABOUT BECOMING AN ENTREPRENEUR IS YOU MAKE AS MUCH AND ONE THING ABOUT BECOMING AN ENTREPRENEUR IS YOU MAKE AS MUCH AS THE MEN, IN FACT WOMEN FIRST ENTREPRENEUR IS YOU MAKE AS MUCH AS THE MEN, IN FACT WOMEN FIRST OF ALL START THE MAJORITY OF AS THE MEN, IN FACT WOMEN FIRST OF ALL START THE MAJORITY OF SMALL COMPANIES AND OF ALL START THE MAJORITY OF SMALL COMPANIES AND ENTREPRENEURS OVERALL, FEMALE SMALL COMPANIES AND ENTREPRENEURS OVERALL, FEMALE ENTREPRENEURS ARE JUST AS LIKELY ENTREPRENEURS OVERALL, FEMALE ENTREPRENEURS ARE JUST AS LIKELY TO MAKE AS MUCH IF NOT MORE THAN ENTREPRENEURS ARE JUST AS LIKELY TO MAKE AS MUCH IF NOT MORE THAN THEIR MALE COUNTERPART.

TO MAKE AS MUCH IF NOT MORE THAN THEIR MALE COUNTERPART.

SO WHY AREN'T WOMEN CATCHING UP THEIR MALE COUNTERPART.

SO WHY AREN'T WOMEN CATCHING UP IN THAT WAY?

SO WHY AREN'T WOMEN CATCHING UP IN THAT WAY?

>> BECAUSE THEY ARE MOSTLY NOT IN THAT WAY?

>> BECAUSE THEY ARE MOSTLY NOT ENTREPRENEURS.

>> BECAUSE THEY ARE MOSTLY NOT ENTREPRENEURS.

IT TAKES A LOT OF RISK FOR WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS.

IT TAKES A LOT OF RISK FOR WOMEN FIRST OF ALL TO GET A JOB.

IT TAKES A LOT OF RISK FOR WOMEN FIRST OF ALL TO GET A JOB.

REMEMBER THIS IS A FIRST GENERAL FIRST OF ALL TO GET A JOB.

REMEMBER THIS IS A FIRST GENERAL OPERATION OF WOMEN GOING TO WORK REMEMBER THIS IS A FIRST GENERAL OPERATION OF WOMEN GOING TO WORK AND NEXT GENERATION A GOOD OPERATION OF WOMEN GOING TO WORK AND NEXT GENERATION A GOOD NUMBER BUT SIZABLE NUMBER OF AND NEXT GENERATION A GOOD NUMBER BUT SIZABLE NUMBER OF WOMEN WILLING TO TAKE WHAT IS NUMBER BUT SIZABLE NUMBER OF WOMEN WILLING TO TAKE WHAT IS REALLY A VERY HUGE RISK OF WOMEN WILLING TO TAKE WHAT IS REALLY A VERY HUGE RISK OF STARTING THEIR OWN BUSINESS.

REALLY A VERY HUGE RISK OF STARTING THEIR OWN BUSINESS.

>> MOST INTERESTING PART OF THE STARTING THEIR OWN BUSINESS.

>> MOST INTERESTING PART OF THE SURVEY I FOUND WAS THAT THEY >> MOST INTERESTING PART OF THE SURVEY I FOUND WAS THAT THEY SHOWED THAT WOMEN WHO WORKED SURVEY I FOUND WAS THAT THEY SHOWED THAT WOMEN WHO WORKED MORE THAN 40 HOURS A WEEK, CLOSE SHOWED THAT WOMEN WHO WORKED MORE THAN 40 HOURS A WEEK, CLOSE TO 50 HOURS A WEEK, WERE MORE THAN 40 HOURS A WEEK, CLOSE TO 50 HOURS A WEEK, WERE ACTUALLY MAKING $9 MORE AN HOUR TO 50 HOURS A WEEK, WERE ACTUALLY MAKING $9 MORE AN HOUR THAN THEIR MOTHERS WERE.

ACTUALLY MAKING $9 MORE AN HOUR THAN THEIR MOTHERS WERE.

THEN THEY LOOKED AT THE MEN AND THAN THEIR MOTHERS WERE.

THEN THEY LOOKED AT THE MEN AND SHOWED THAT THE MEN ACTUALLY THEN THEY LOOKED AT THE MEN AND SHOWED THAT THE MEN ACTUALLY WERE NOW WORKING ONLY A LITTLE SHOWED THAT THE MEN ACTUALLY WERE NOW WORKING ONLY A LITTLE BIT OVER 40 HOURS A WEEK AND WERE NOW WORKING ONLY A LITTLE BIT OVER 40 HOURS A WEEK AND THEY WERE ONLY MAKING $5 AN HOUR BIT OVER 40 HOURS A WEEK AND THEY WERE ONLY MAKING $5 AN HOUR MORE AS A RESULT.

THEY WERE ONLY MAKING $5 AN HOUR MORE AS A RESULT.

I ACTUALLY DO THINK SOME OF THIS MORE AS A RESULT.

I ACTUALLY DO THINK SOME OF THIS IS CATCHING UP.

I ACTUALLY DO THINK SOME OF THIS IS CATCHING UP.

IT'S THE WOMEN NOW WHO ARE IS CATCHING UP.

IT'S THE WOMEN NOW WHO ARE WORKING MORE HOURS AND MAKING IT'S THE WOMEN NOW WHO ARE WORKING MORE HOURS AND MAKING MORE MONEY IN THAT SENSE AND MEN WORKING MORE HOURS AND MAKING MORE MONEY IN THAT SENSE AND MEN WORKING LESS HOURS AND MAKING MORE MONEY IN THAT SENSE AND MEN WORKING LESS HOURS AND MAKING LESS MONEY.

WORKING LESS HOURS AND MAKING LESS MONEY.

I THINK SOME OF THIS ACTUALLY LESS MONEY.

I THINK SOME OF THIS ACTUALLY WILL CATCH UP VERY SOON.

I THINK SOME OF THIS ACTUALLY WILL CATCH UP VERY SOON.

>> LAST WORD?

WILL CATCH UP VERY SOON.

>> LAST WORD?

>> WELL, I JUST THINK THAT >> LAST WORD?

>> WELL, I JUST THINK THAT COMPANIES NEED TO HANG ON TO >> WELL, I JUST THINK THAT COMPANIES NEED TO HANG ON TO THESE WOMEN.

COMPANIES NEED TO HANG ON TO THESE WOMEN.

THE STUDY LOOKED AT WOMEN IN THESE WOMEN.

THE STUDY LOOKED AT WOMEN IN THEIR 40s HAVING CHILDREN THE STUDY LOOKED AT WOMEN IN THEIR 40s HAVING CHILDREN THAT'S WHEN THE PIPELINE LEAKED THEIR 40s HAVING CHILDREN THAT'S WHEN THE PIPELINE LEAKED THESE VERY TALENTED WOMEN THAT THAT'S WHEN THE PIPELINE LEAKED THESE VERY TALENTED WOMEN THAT THEY PAID TO TRAIN.

THESE VERY TALENTED WOMEN THAT THEY PAID TO TRAIN.

IT'S A LOSS FOR BUSINESS, LOSS THEY PAID TO TRAIN.

IT'S A LOSS FOR BUSINESS, LOSS FOR THE FAMILIES AND LOSS FOR IT'S A LOSS FOR BUSINESS, LOSS FOR THE FAMILIES AND LOSS FOR THE CHILDREN OF THESE FOR THE FAMILIES AND LOSS FOR THE CHILDREN OF THESE HOUSEHOLDS.

THE CHILDREN OF THESE HOUSEHOLDS.

>> ALL RIGHT.

HOUSEHOLDS.

>> ALL RIGHT.

LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

>> ALL RIGHT.

LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE AND @TOTHECONTRARY.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE AND @TOTHECONTRARY.

FROM THE PAY GAP TO CAMPAIGN @BONNIEERBE AND @TOTHECONTRARY.

FROM THE PAY GAP TO CAMPAIGN DONATIONS.

FROM THE PAY GAP TO CAMPAIGN DONATIONS.

WILL WOMEN CANDIDATES BENEFIT DONATIONS.

WILL WOMEN CANDIDATES BENEFIT FROM THIS WEEK'S SUPREME COURT WILL WOMEN CANDIDATES BENEFIT FROM THIS WEEK'S SUPREME COURT DECISION ON CAMPAIGN FINANCING?

FROM THIS WEEK'S SUPREME COURT DECISION ON CAMPAIGN FINANCING?

THE "SHE SHOULD RUN" CAMPAIGN DECISION ON CAMPAIGN FINANCING?

THE "SHE SHOULD RUN" CAMPAIGN TELLS US IT'S CAUTIOUSLY THE "SHE SHOULD RUN" CAMPAIGN TELLS US IT'S CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC THE RULING COULD BE TELLS US IT'S CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC THE RULING COULD BE GOOD NEWS FOR WOMEN.

OPTIMISTIC THE RULING COULD BE GOOD NEWS FOR WOMEN.

THE MCCUTCHEON V. FEC ELIMINATES GOOD NEWS FOR WOMEN.

THE MCCUTCHEON V. FEC ELIMINATES THE LIMITS ON HOW MUCH AN THE MCCUTCHEON V. FEC ELIMINATES THE LIMITS ON HOW MUCH AN INDIVIDUAL DONOR CAN CONTRIBUTE THE LIMITS ON HOW MUCH AN INDIVIDUAL DONOR CAN CONTRIBUTE IN ONE ELECTION SEASON.

INDIVIDUAL DONOR CAN CONTRIBUTE IN ONE ELECTION SEASON.

IT'S BEEN WIDELY TOUTED AS A SOP IN ONE ELECTION SEASON.

IT'S BEEN WIDELY TOUTED AS A SOP TO PARTY LEADERS AND DEEP IT'S BEEN WIDELY TOUTED AS A SOP TO PARTY LEADERS AND DEEP POCKETED DONORS.

TO PARTY LEADERS AND DEEP POCKETED DONORS.

BUT THE "SHE SHOULD RUN" POCKETED DONORS.

BUT THE "SHE SHOULD RUN" CAMPAIGN SAYS, QUOTE, "ONE OF BUT THE "SHE SHOULD RUN" CAMPAIGN SAYS, QUOTE, "ONE OF THE SILVER LININGS OF THE CAMPAIGN SAYS, QUOTE, "ONE OF THE SILVER LININGS OF THE RULING IS IT MIGHT PUT MORE THE SILVER LININGS OF THE RULING IS IT MIGHT PUT MORE MONEY IN THE HANDS OF THE RULING IS IT MIGHT PUT MORE MONEY IN THE HANDS OF THE PARTIES INSTEAD OF OUTSIDE MONEY IN THE HANDS OF THE PARTIES INSTEAD OF OUTSIDE GROUPS.

PARTIES INSTEAD OF OUTSIDE GROUPS.

TRADITIONALLY, PARTIES HAVE GROUPS.

TRADITIONALLY, PARTIES HAVE PROVEN BETTER AT SUPPORTING TRADITIONALLY, PARTIES HAVE PROVEN BETTER AT SUPPORTING WOMEN CANDIDATES THAN PROVEN BETTER AT SUPPORTING WOMEN CANDIDATES THAN ISSUE-ORIENTED POLITICAL ACTION WOMEN CANDIDATES THAN ISSUE-ORIENTED POLITICAL ACTION COMMITEES."

ISSUE-ORIENTED POLITICAL ACTION COMMITEES."

IN 2012 WOMEN WERE 20% OF THE COMMITEES."

IN 2012 WOMEN WERE 20% OF THE CANDIDATES.

IN 2012 WOMEN WERE 20% OF THE CANDIDATES.

THE TWO MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES CANDIDATES.

THE TWO MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES DONATED 35% OF THEIR FUNDS TO THE TWO MAJOR POLITICAL PARTIES DONATED 35% OF THEIR FUNDS TO WOMEN CANDIDATES.

DONATED 35% OF THEIR FUNDS TO WOMEN CANDIDATES.

THE NATION'S 20 LARGEST PACS WOMEN CANDIDATES.

THE NATION'S 20 LARGEST PACS GAVE 18% TO WOMEN CANDIDATES.

THE NATION'S 20 LARGEST PACS GAVE 18% TO WOMEN CANDIDATES.

CONTINENTAL GUESS WOMAN NORTON GAVE 18% TO WOMEN CANDIDATES.

CONTINENTAL GUESS WOMAN NORTON WHY ARE PARTIES BETTER TO WOMEN CONTINENTAL GUESS WOMAN NORTON WHY ARE PARTIES BETTER TO WOMEN THAN PACS AND I'M STUCK ON THAT WHY ARE PARTIES BETTER TO WOMEN THAN PACS AND I'M STUCK ON THAT FIGURE THAT WAS IN THE REPORT THAN PACS AND I'M STUCK ON THAT FIGURE THAT WAS IN THE REPORT SAYING THAT PACs GAVE ONLY 18% FIGURE THAT WAS IN THE REPORT SAYING THAT PACs GAVE ONLY 18% YET PARTIES GIVE 35% OF THEIR SAYING THAT PACs GAVE ONLY 18% YET PARTIES GIVE 35% OF THEIR FUNDS TO WOMEN CANDIDATES.

YET PARTIES GIVE 35% OF THEIR FUNDS TO WOMEN CANDIDATES.

BUT HOW MUCH IS GIVEN OVERALL FUNDS TO WOMEN CANDIDATES.

BUT HOW MUCH IS GIVEN OVERALL PACs VERSUS PARTIES, WHICH BUT HOW MUCH IS GIVEN OVERALL PACs VERSUS PARTIES, WHICH GETS MORE?

PACs VERSUS PARTIES, WHICH GETS MORE?

>> WOMEN WILL BE BEHIND THE GETS MORE?

>> WOMEN WILL BE BEHIND THE GAME.

>> WOMEN WILL BE BEHIND THE GAME.

PACs USUALLY GIVE MONEY TO GAME.

PACs USUALLY GIVE MONEY TO PEOPLE WHO ARE INCUMBENT.

PACs USUALLY GIVE MONEY TO PEOPLE WHO ARE INCUMBENT.

>> I THINK PACs USUALLY SPEND PEOPLE WHO ARE INCUMBENT.

>> I THINK PACs USUALLY SPEND MONEY ON ISSUES, THE AD >> I THINK PACs USUALLY SPEND MONEY ON ISSUES, THE AD CAMPAIGNS.

MONEY ON ISSUES, THE AD CAMPAIGNS.

>> ISSUES, YES.

CAMPAIGNS.

>> ISSUES, YES.

GIVING TO PEOPLE BASED ON WHAT >> ISSUES, YES.

GIVING TO PEOPLE BASED ON WHAT COMMITTEE THEY'RE ON AND SINCE GIVING TO PEOPLE BASED ON WHAT COMMITTEE THEY'RE ON AND SINCE WOMEN ARE BEHIND IN THE FIRST COMMITTEE THEY'RE ON AND SINCE WOMEN ARE BEHIND IN THE FIRST PLACE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GET WOMEN ARE BEHIND IN THE FIRST PLACE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GET THAT MONEY.

PLACE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO GET THAT MONEY.

I'M GOING TO SAY I THINK?

THAT MONEY.

I'M GOING TO SAY I THINK?

IS MAKING LEMONS OUT OF I'M GOING TO SAY I THINK?

IS MAKING LEMONS OUT OF LEMONADE.

IS MAKING LEMONS OUT OF LEMONADE.

THE NOTION THAT THEY LEFT TO LEMONADE.

THE NOTION THAT THEY LEFT TO FACE THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE HOW THE NOTION THAT THEY LEFT TO FACE THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE HOW HOW MUCH YOU CAN CONTRIBUTE FACE THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE HOW HOW MUCH YOU CAN CONTRIBUTE MEANS MAYBE SOME OF THIS MONEY HOW MUCH YOU CAN CONTRIBUTE MEANS MAYBE SOME OF THIS MONEY WILL GO TO PARTIES MAYBE WE'LL MEANS MAYBE SOME OF THIS MONEY WILL GO TO PARTIES MAYBE WE'LL GET SOME EQUILIBRIUM OR EQUALITY WILL GO TO PARTIES MAYBE WE'LL GET SOME EQUILIBRIUM OR EQUALITY OUT OF IT, I HOPE SO.

GET SOME EQUILIBRIUM OR EQUALITY OUT OF IT, I HOPE SO.

BUT I THINK THE TREND IS A VERY OUT OF IT, I HOPE SO.

BUT I THINK THE TREND IS A VERY BAD ONE FOR WOMEN.

BUT I THINK THE TREND IS A VERY BAD ONE FOR WOMEN.

>> ALSO HAVE TO LOOK AT THE BAD ONE FOR WOMEN.

>> ALSO HAVE TO LOOK AT THE MOTIVE OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE >> ALSO HAVE TO LOOK AT THE MOTIVE OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GIVING THE MONEY.

MOTIVE OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GIVING THE MONEY.

THE HIGH DOLLAR DONORS.

GIVING THE MONEY.

THE HIGH DOLLAR DONORS.

IF YOU ARE GIVING TO A PAC, FOR THE HIGH DOLLAR DONORS.

IF YOU ARE GIVING TO A PAC, FOR INSTANCE, LIKE THE PACs THEY IF YOU ARE GIVING TO A PAC, FOR INSTANCE, LIKE THE PACs THEY JUST WANT TO GET THE PEOPLE WHO INSTANCE, LIKE THE PACs THEY JUST WANT TO GET THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ELECTED, MOST LIKELY TO VOTE JUST WANT TO GET THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ELECTED, MOST LIKELY TO VOTE IN THE DIRECTION THAT THEY WANT ARE ELECTED, MOST LIKELY TO VOTE IN THE DIRECTION THAT THEY WANT THEM TO.

IN THE DIRECTION THAT THEY WANT THEM TO.

THEY DON'T CARE IF THEY'RE WOMEN THEM TO.

THEY DON'T CARE IF THEY'RE WOMEN OR MEN, HOW LIKELY ARE YOU TO THEY DON'T CARE IF THEY'RE WOMEN OR MEN, HOW LIKELY ARE YOU TO VOTE FOR MY INTEREST.

OR MEN, HOW LIKELY ARE YOU TO VOTE FOR MY INTEREST.

WHERE AS THE PARTIES THEY'RE NOT VOTE FOR MY INTEREST.

WHERE AS THE PARTIES THEY'RE NOT AS CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.

WHERE AS THE PARTIES THEY'RE NOT AS CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.

NOT HOW LIKELY ARE YOU, IT'S AS CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.

NOT HOW LIKELY ARE YOU, IT'S WILL YOU, GREAT.

NOT HOW LIKELY ARE YOU, IT'S WILL YOU, GREAT.

THERE FOR THEY CAN FOCUS A WILL YOU, GREAT.

THERE FOR THEY CAN FOCUS A LITTLE BIT MORE ON DIVERSITY THERE FOR THEY CAN FOCUS A LITTLE BIT MORE ON DIVERSITY GETTING MORE WOMEN ELECTED FOR LITTLE BIT MORE ON DIVERSITY GETTING MORE WOMEN ELECTED FOR THAT REASON.

GETTING MORE WOMEN ELECTED FOR THAT REASON.

>> I THINK GREAT FOR WOMEN.

THAT REASON.

>> I THINK GREAT FOR WOMEN.

I LOOK AT A LOT OF FEMALE >> I THINK GREAT FOR WOMEN.

I LOOK AT A LOT OF FEMALE CANDIDATES ALL THESE WOMEN ARE I LOOK AT A LOT OF FEMALE CANDIDATES ALL THESE WOMEN ARE IN PRIMARIES.

CANDIDATES ALL THESE WOMEN ARE IN PRIMARIES.

LOT OF THESE WOMEN HISTORICALLY IN PRIMARIES.

LOT OF THESE WOMEN HISTORICALLY HARDER FOR THEM TO RAISE MONEY LOT OF THESE WOMEN HISTORICALLY HARDER FOR THEM TO RAISE MONEY THAN MALE COUNTER PARTS.

HARDER FOR THEM TO RAISE MONEY THAN MALE COUNTER PARTS.

THESE WOMEN ALLOW MORE THAN MALE COUNTER PARTS.

THESE WOMEN ALLOW MORE RESOURCES.

THESE WOMEN ALLOW MORE RESOURCES.

IT'S -- THEY ASK THE BIG DONORS RESOURCES.

IT'S -- THEY ASK THE BIG DONORS TO GET THE BIG DONATIONS.

IT'S -- THEY ASK THE BIG DONORS TO GET THE BIG DONATIONS.

SOME GAVE TO PRIMARY, SHOULD GO TO GET THE BIG DONATIONS.

SOME GAVE TO PRIMARY, SHOULD GO BACK TO THAT DONOR I WON THE SOME GAVE TO PRIMARY, SHOULD GO BACK TO THAT DONOR I WON THE PRIMARY I WANT YOUR SUPPORT NOW.

BACK TO THAT DONOR I WON THE PRIMARY I WANT YOUR SUPPORT NOW.

AND THESE COMMITTEES HAVE ALWAYS PRIMARY I WANT YOUR SUPPORT NOW.

AND THESE COMMITTEES HAVE ALWAYS BEEN VERY SUPPORTIVE.

AND THESE COMMITTEES HAVE ALWAYS BEEN VERY SUPPORTIVE.

I KNOW REPUBLICAN SIDE, TO GET BEEN VERY SUPPORTIVE.

I KNOW REPUBLICAN SIDE, TO GET MORE WOMEN ELECTED TO CONGRESS.

I KNOW REPUBLICAN SIDE, TO GET MORE WOMEN ELECTED TO CONGRESS.

JUST GOING TO HELP MORE WOMEN MORE WOMEN ELECTED TO CONGRESS.

JUST GOING TO HELP MORE WOMEN GET TO CONGRESS, THAT THE GREAT.

JUST GOING TO HELP MORE WOMEN GET TO CONGRESS, THAT THE GREAT.

WE NEED MORE WOMEN IN GET TO CONGRESS, THAT THE GREAT.

WE NEED MORE WOMEN IN GOVERNMENT.

WE NEED MORE WOMEN IN GOVERNMENT.

>> I DON'T SEE THIS AS A GOOD GOVERNMENT.

>> I DON'T SEE THIS AS A GOOD THING.

>> I DON'T SEE THIS AS A GOOD THING.

IT'S GONE FROM ONE MAN, ONE THING.

IT'S GONE FROM ONE MAN, ONE VOTE, ONE MAN, ONE WOMAN ONE IT'S GONE FROM ONE MAN, ONE VOTE, ONE MAN, ONE WOMAN ONE VOTE, YOU PAY TO PLAY.

VOTE, ONE MAN, ONE WOMAN ONE VOTE, YOU PAY TO PLAY.

I LIVED IN EUROPE THE LAST FOUR VOTE, YOU PAY TO PLAY.

I LIVED IN EUROPE THE LAST FOUR YEARS THERE'S NO HOER WESTERN I LIVED IN EUROPE THE LAST FOUR YEARS THERE'S NO HOER WESTERN DEMOCRACY THAT HAS THIS OCEAN OF YEARS THERE'S NO HOER WESTERN DEMOCRACY THAT HAS THIS OCEAN OF MONEY IN THE PROCESS AND IN FACT DEMOCRACY THAT HAS THIS OCEAN OF MONEY IN THE PROCESS AND IN FACT WHEN YOU TALK TO PEOPLE WHO ARE MONEY IN THE PROCESS AND IN FACT WHEN YOU TALK TO PEOPLE WHO ARE THINKING ABOUT PULLING OUT OF WHEN YOU TALK TO PEOPLE WHO ARE THINKING ABOUT PULLING OUT OF CHINA NOW BECAUSE THE POLITICAL THINKING ABOUT PULLING OUT OF CHINA NOW BECAUSE THE POLITICAL INSTABILITY COMPANIES ARE CHINA NOW BECAUSE THE POLITICAL INSTABILITY COMPANIES ARE RECOGNIZING THAT THEY DON'T INSTABILITY COMPANIES ARE RECOGNIZING THAT THEY DON'T REALLY WANT TO BE THERE BECAUSE RECOGNIZING THAT THEY DON'T REALLY WANT TO BE THERE BECAUSE THERE'S NO RULE OF LAW.

REALLY WANT TO BE THERE BECAUSE THERE'S NO RULE OF LAW.

I SAID TO COUPLE OF THEM, WHAT THERE'S NO RULE OF LAW.

I SAID TO COUPLE OF THEM, WHAT ABOUT AMERICA.

I SAID TO COUPLE OF THEM, WHAT ABOUT AMERICA.

OUR LABOR RATES ARE FAVORABLE.

ABOUT AMERICA.

OUR LABOR RATES ARE FAVORABLE.

BASICALLY WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT OUR LABOR RATES ARE FAVORABLE.

BASICALLY WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT THE LEGAL -- THEY WERE WORRIED BASICALLY WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT THE LEGAL -- THEY WERE WORRIED ABOUT THE SEQUESTER, THE SEIZING THE LEGAL -- THEY WERE WORRIED ABOUT THE SEQUESTER, THE SEIZING UP OF THE DECISION MAKING ABOUT THE SEQUESTER, THE SEIZING UP OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS AND THEY -- THEY SAID UP OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS AND THEY -- THEY SAID CORRUPTION IS LEGALIZED BY YOUR PROCESS AND THEY -- THEY SAID CORRUPTION IS LEGALIZED BY YOUR SUPREME COURT.

CORRUPTION IS LEGALIZED BY YOUR SUPREME COURT.

SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO LEAVE THE SUPREME COURT.

SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO LEAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO FIND OUT WHAT SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO LEAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO FIND OUT WHAT PEOPLE THINK OF YOU.

NEIGHBORHOOD TO FIND OUT WHAT PEOPLE THINK OF YOU.

IT'S A BLACK EYE.

PEOPLE THINK OF YOU.

IT'S A BLACK EYE.

WE'RE GOING FURTHER DOWN THIS IT'S A BLACK EYE.

WE'RE GOING FURTHER DOWN THIS ROAD OF LETTING MONEY INFECT WE'RE GOING FURTHER DOWN THIS ROAD OF LETTING MONEY INFECT POLITICS.

ROAD OF LETTING MONEY INFECT POLITICS.

IN KELP MOCK CAN:SEE IT'S POLITICS.

IN KELP MOCK CAN:SEE IT'S DANGEROUS THING.

IN KELP MOCK CAN:SEE IT'S DANGEROUS THING.

WEENIE THAT FROM OUR OWN DANGEROUS THING.

WEENIE THAT FROM OUR OWN HISTORY.

WEENIE THAT FROM OUR OWN HISTORY.

>> ALREADY GO BACK AND SAY, YOU HISTORY.

>> ALREADY GO BACK AND SAY, YOU CAN NOW GIVE TO EVERYBODY.

>> ALREADY GO BACK AND SAY, YOU CAN NOW GIVE TO EVERYBODY.

MORE AND MORE.

CAN NOW GIVE TO EVERYBODY.

MORE AND MORE.

>> BUT THAT'S WHY ANY THEY'RE MORE AND MORE.

>> BUT THAT'S WHY ANY THEY'RE GOING TO OPEN UP AS MUCH OF THE >> BUT THAT'S WHY ANY THEY'RE GOING TO OPEN UP AS MUCH OF THE OPPONENTS BECAUSE DONORS DON'T GOING TO OPEN UP AS MUCH OF THE OPPONENTS BECAUSE DONORS DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE OR DON'T OPPONENTS BECAUSE DONORS DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE OR DON'T NECESSARILY WANT TO GIVE MORE NECESSARILY HAVE OR DON'T NECESSARILY WANT TO GIVE MORE MONEY THAN THEY'RE GIVING NOW.

NECESSARILY WANT TO GIVE MORE MONEY THAN THEY'RE GIVING NOW.

THOSE THAT DO WANT TO GIVE MORE MONEY THAN THEY'RE GIVING NOW.

THOSE THAT DO WANT TO GIVE MORE MONEY ARE ALREADY FINDING WAYS THOSE THAT DO WANT TO GIVE MORE MONEY ARE ALREADY FINDING WAYS TO DO THAT.

MONEY ARE ALREADY FINDING WAYS TO DO THAT.

THAT IS WHY THEY STARTED THESE TO DO THAT.

THAT IS WHY THEY STARTED THESE MAJOR POLITICAL GROUPS THAT ARE THAT IS WHY THEY STARTED THESE MAJOR POLITICAL GROUPS THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THE PARTY COMMITTEE MAJOR POLITICAL GROUPS THAT ARE OUTSIDE OF THE PARTY COMMITTEE FOR WHICH THEY CAN DIRECTLY OUTSIDE OF THE PARTY COMMITTEE FOR WHICH THEY CAN DIRECTLY CONTROL Y.

WOULD YOU GIVE TO A FOR WHICH THEY CAN DIRECTLY CONTROL Y.

WOULD YOU GIVE TO A PARTY COMMITTEE WHEN YOU CAN CONTROL Y.

WOULD YOU GIVE TO A PARTY COMMITTEE WHEN YOU CAN JUST START YOUR OWN GROUP.

PARTY COMMITTEE WHEN YOU CAN JUST START YOUR OWN GROUP.

>> LET ME ASK YOU THIS, IS IT JUST START YOUR OWN GROUP.

>> LET ME ASK YOU THIS, IS IT FAIR TO DERIVE FROM THIS PANEL >> LET ME ASK YOU THIS, IS IT FAIR TO DERIVE FROM THIS PANEL THE TWO DEMOCRATS ARE NOT IN FAIR TO DERIVE FROM THIS PANEL THE TWO DEMOCRATS ARE NOT IN FAVOR THE TWO REPUBLICANS ARE.

THE TWO DEMOCRATS ARE NOT IN FAVOR THE TWO REPUBLICANS ARE.

THAT REPUBLICAN WOMEN WILL DO FAVOR THE TWO REPUBLICANS ARE.

THAT REPUBLICAN WOMEN WILL DO WELL BUT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN WON'T THAT REPUBLICAN WOMEN WILL DO WELL BUT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN WON'T DO WELL?

WELL BUT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN WON'T DO WELL?

>> I TELL YOU ONE THING.

DO WELL?

>> I TELL YOU ONE THING.

REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE A VERY >> I TELL YOU ONE THING.

REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE A VERY POOR JOB IN GETTING WOMEN TO THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE A VERY POOR JOB IN GETTING WOMEN TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND -- POOR JOB IN GETTING WOMEN TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND -- >> AREN'T THEY STEPPING IT UP -- HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND -- >> AREN'T THEY STEPPING IT UP -- >> ABSOLUTELY STEPPING UP.

>> AREN'T THEY STEPPING IT UP -- >> ABSOLUTELY STEPPING UP.

IT IS ABOUT MONEY.

>> ABSOLUTELY STEPPING UP.

IT IS ABOUT MONEY.

IT IS ABOUT -- IT IS ABOUT MONEY.

IT IS ABOUT -- >> WE HAVE SO MUCH MORE IN THAT, IT IS ABOUT -- >> WE HAVE SO MUCH MORE IN THAT, THREE TO ONE DEMOCRATS TO WOMEN?

>> WE HAVE SO MUCH MORE IN THAT, THREE TO ONE DEMOCRATS TO WOMEN?

REPUBLICANS, THAT'S NOT ABOUT -- THREE TO ONE DEMOCRATS TO WOMEN?

REPUBLICANS, THAT'S NOT ABOUT -- >> WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOW A LOT REPUBLICANS, THAT'S NOT ABOUT -- >> WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOW A LOT OF GREAT WOMEN RUNNING IN >> WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOW A LOT OF GREAT WOMEN RUNNING IN CONGRESS RIGHT NOW LOOK GO AT OF GREAT WOMEN RUNNING IN CONGRESS RIGHT NOW LOOK GO AT AMEA LOVE, ALL THESE FANTASTIC CONGRESS RIGHT NOW LOOK GO AT AMEA LOVE, ALL THESE FANTASTIC WOMEN RUNNING FOR CONGRESS AMEA LOVE, ALL THESE FANTASTIC WOMEN RUNNING FOR CONGRESS MAKING SURE THEY HAVE THE MONEY WOMEN RUNNING FOR CONGRESS MAKING SURE THEY HAVE THE MONEY TO COMPETE IN THESE COMPETITIVE MAKING SURE THEY HAVE THE MONEY TO COMPETE IN THESE COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS.

TO COMPETE IN THESE COMPETITIVE ELECTIONS.

OPENING THOSE FLOOD GATES -- I ELECTIONS.

OPENING THOSE FLOOD GATES -- I DON'T KNOW BLOOD GATES BUT MORE OPENING THOSE FLOOD GATES -- I DON'T KNOW BLOOD GATES BUT MORE RESOURCES -- DON'T KNOW BLOOD GATES BUT MORE RESOURCES -- >> THE TEA PARTY CAN COMPETE RESOURCES -- >> THE TEA PARTY CAN COMPETE AGAINST -- >> THE TEA PARTY CAN COMPETE AGAINST -- >> IT'S NOT THAT I'M IN FAVOR OF AGAINST -- >> IT'S NOT THAT I'M IN FAVOR OF IT.

>> IT'S NOT THAT I'M IN FAVOR OF IT.

I REALLY AM NOT IN FAVOR OR IT.

I REALLY AM NOT IN FAVOR OR AGAINST IT, I DON'T CARE EITHER I REALLY AM NOT IN FAVOR OR AGAINST IT, I DON'T CARE EITHER WAY.

AGAINST IT, I DON'T CARE EITHER WAY.

I'M JUST SAYING THAT I DON'T WAY.

I'M JUST SAYING THAT I DON'T THINK IT WILT BE THE FLOOD GATE I'M JUST SAYING THAT I DON'T THINK IT WILT BE THE FLOOD GATE OPENING THAT DEMOCRATS THINK IT THINK IT WILT BE THE FLOOD GATE OPENING THAT DEMOCRATS THINK IT WILL BE.

OPENING THAT DEMOCRATS THINK IT WILL BE.

AND I DON'T NECESSARILY ALSO WILL BE.

AND I DON'T NECESSARILY ALSO THINK IT WILL BE THE FLOOD GATE AND I DON'T NECESSARILY ALSO THINK IT WILL BE THE FLOOD GATE OPENING FOR WOMEN THAT MAYBE THINK IT WILL BE THE FLOOD GATE OPENING FOR WOMEN THAT MAYBE CONSERVATIVES -- OPENING FOR WOMEN THAT MAYBE CONSERVATIVES -- >> IT'S MORE OPPORTUNITIES.

CONSERVATIVES -- >> IT'S MORE OPPORTUNITIES.

WHO WOMEN NEED MORE >> IT'S MORE OPPORTUNITIES.

WHO WOMEN NEED MORE OPPORTUNITIES.

WHO WOMEN NEED MORE OPPORTUNITIES.

>> QUICK.

OPPORTUNITIES.

>> QUICK.

>> I THIS IT'S GOOD NEWS FOR >> QUICK.

>> I THIS IT'S GOOD NEWS FOR OIL, FOR GUNS, FOR HEDGE FUNDS.

>> I THIS IT'S GOOD NEWS FOR OIL, FOR GUNS, FOR HEDGE FUNDS.

PEOPLE HAVE MONEY WE'VE SEEN HOW OIL, FOR GUNS, FOR HEDGE FUNDS.

PEOPLE HAVE MONEY WE'VE SEEN HOW THEIR MONEY HAS PLAYED I THINK PEOPLE HAVE MONEY WE'VE SEEN HOW THEIR MONEY HAS PLAYED I THINK LOT OF TIMES IT'S NOT GREAT FOR THEIR MONEY HAS PLAYED I THINK LOT OF TIMES IT'S NOT GREAT FOR THE AVERAGE VOTER WHO FEELS LIKE LOT OF TIMES IT'S NOT GREAT FOR THE AVERAGE VOTER WHO FEELS LIKE THEIR VOICE ISN'T BEING HEARD.

THE AVERAGE VOTER WHO FEELS LIKE THEIR VOICE ISN'T BEING HEARD.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: THEIR VOICE ISN'T BEING HEARD.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: IS MODERN TECHNOLOGY EMPOWERING BEHIND THE HEADLINES: IS MODERN TECHNOLOGY EMPOWERING OR ENSLAVING US?

IS MODERN TECHNOLOGY EMPOWERING OR ENSLAVING US?

MOBILE DEVICES ADD TO WORKPLACE OR ENSLAVING US?

MOBILE DEVICES ADD TO WORKPLACE FLEXIBILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY.

MOBILE DEVICES ADD TO WORKPLACE FLEXIBILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY.

BUT EMPLOYEES FACE CHALLENGES AS FLEXIBILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY.

BUT EMPLOYEES FACE CHALLENGES AS THE LINES BETWEEN WORK AND LIFE BUT EMPLOYEES FACE CHALLENGES AS THE LINES BETWEEN WORK AND LIFE BECOME INCREASINGLY BLURRED BY THE LINES BETWEEN WORK AND LIFE BECOME INCREASINGLY BLURRED BY TECHNOLOGY.

BECOME INCREASINGLY BLURRED BY TECHNOLOGY.

>> PEOPLE TO BE ANYWHERE, ANY TECHNOLOGY.

>> PEOPLE TO BE ANYWHERE, ANY TIME SO THEY CAN ATTEND TO WORK >> PEOPLE TO BE ANYWHERE, ANY TIME SO THEY CAN ATTEND TO WORK TASKS.

TIME SO THEY CAN ATTEND TO WORK TASKS.

SO, I THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE TASKS.

SO, I THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE EMPOWERING CAUSE PEOPLE WOULD SO, I THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE EMPOWERING CAUSE PEOPLE WOULD FEEL THAT, "OKAY...TECHNOLOGY EMPOWERING CAUSE PEOPLE WOULD FEEL THAT, "OKAY...TECHNOLOGY HELPS ME TO DO MY WORK WHILE FEEL THAT, "OKAY...TECHNOLOGY HELPS ME TO DO MY WORK WHILE BEING AWAY FROM WORK."

HELPS ME TO DO MY WORK WHILE BEING AWAY FROM WORK."

>> UTHPALA TENNAKOON, AN BEING AWAY FROM WORK."

>> UTHPALA TENNAKOON, AN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AT MOUNT >> UTHPALA TENNAKOON, AN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AT MOUNT ROYAL UNIVERSITY IN CANADA ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AT MOUNT ROYAL UNIVERSITY IN CANADA DECIDED TO STUDY TECHNOLOGY AND ROYAL UNIVERSITY IN CANADA DECIDED TO STUDY TECHNOLOGY AND WORK AFTER LIVING THROUGH ITS DECIDED TO STUDY TECHNOLOGY AND WORK AFTER LIVING THROUGH ITS IMPACT.

WORK AFTER LIVING THROUGH ITS IMPACT.

SHE SURVEYED MANAGERS AND IMPACT.

SHE SURVEYED MANAGERS AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES IN TWO SHE SURVEYED MANAGERS AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES IN TWO VERY DIFFERENT COUNTRIES--- PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES IN TWO VERY DIFFERENT COUNTRIES--- CANADA AND SRI LANKA.

VERY DIFFERENT COUNTRIES--- CANADA AND SRI LANKA.

>> ONE VERY INTERESTING THING CANADA AND SRI LANKA.

>> ONE VERY INTERESTING THING WAS THERE WAS NO BIG DIFFERENCE >> ONE VERY INTERESTING THING WAS THERE WAS NO BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COUNTRIES AT ALL AND WAS THERE WAS NO BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COUNTRIES AT ALL AND WHAT I FOUND WAS PEOPLE TEND TO BETWEEN THE COUNTRIES AT ALL AND WHAT I FOUND WAS PEOPLE TEND TO TAKE WORK HOME A LOT.

WHAT I FOUND WAS PEOPLE TEND TO TAKE WORK HOME A LOT.

>> TENNAKOON FOUND TWO NEGATIVE TAKE WORK HOME A LOT.

>> TENNAKOON FOUND TWO NEGATIVE EFFECTS.

>> TENNAKOON FOUND TWO NEGATIVE EFFECTS.

THE FIRST IS "WORK-TO-LIFE EFFECTS.

THE FIRST IS "WORK-TO-LIFE CONFLICT".

THE FIRST IS "WORK-TO-LIFE CONFLICT".

>> YOU'RE USING YOUR SMART PHONE CONFLICT".

>> YOU'RE USING YOUR SMART PHONE CHECKING YOUR EMAIL ON THE >> YOU'RE USING YOUR SMART PHONE CHECKING YOUR EMAIL ON THE BLACKBERRY ALL THE TIME WHILE AT CHECKING YOUR EMAIL ON THE BLACKBERRY ALL THE TIME WHILE AT THE DINNER TABLE OR AT YOUR BLACKBERRY ALL THE TIME WHILE AT THE DINNER TABLE OR AT YOUR KIDS' GAME.

THE DINNER TABLE OR AT YOUR KIDS' GAME.

IT ACTUALLY TAKES AWAY YOUR KIDS' GAME.

IT ACTUALLY TAKES AWAY YOUR ATTENTION AND YOUR TIME AND IT ACTUALLY TAKES AWAY YOUR ATTENTION AND YOUR TIME AND ENERGY THAT YOU HAVE THAT YOU ATTENTION AND YOUR TIME AND ENERGY THAT YOU HAVE THAT YOU SHOULD BE USING TOWARDS YOUR ENERGY THAT YOU HAVE THAT YOU SHOULD BE USING TOWARDS YOUR NONWORK SITUATIONS OR BUT YOU SHOULD BE USING TOWARDS YOUR NONWORK SITUATIONS OR BUT YOU ARE USING IT TOWARDS WORK NONWORK SITUATIONS OR BUT YOU ARE USING IT TOWARDS WORK SITUATIONS WHICH CREATE THE ARE USING IT TOWARDS WORK SITUATIONS WHICH CREATE THE CONFLICT BETWEEN WORK AND LIFE.

SITUATIONS WHICH CREATE THE CONFLICT BETWEEN WORK AND LIFE.

>> THE SECOND IS A NEGATIVE CONFLICT BETWEEN WORK AND LIFE.

>> THE SECOND IS A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON "LIFE-TO-WORK >> THE SECOND IS A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON "LIFE-TO-WORK ENRICHMENT".

IMPACT ON "LIFE-TO-WORK ENRICHMENT".

>> WHEN YOU SPEND TIME IN ENRICHMENT".

>> WHEN YOU SPEND TIME IN SOMETHING THAT YOU LOVE TO DO >> WHEN YOU SPEND TIME IN SOMETHING THAT YOU LOVE TO DO WHETHER WITH YOUR FAMILY OR IN A SOMETHING THAT YOU LOVE TO DO WHETHER WITH YOUR FAMILY OR IN A LEISURE ACTIVITY, WHATEVER IT WHETHER WITH YOUR FAMILY OR IN A LEISURE ACTIVITY, WHATEVER IT IS, THOSE POSITIVE THINGS THAT LEISURE ACTIVITY, WHATEVER IT IS, THOSE POSITIVE THINGS THAT YOU FEEL ARE TRANSFERRED TO YOUR IS, THOSE POSITIVE THINGS THAT YOU FEEL ARE TRANSFERRED TO YOUR WORK DOMAIN.

YOU FEEL ARE TRANSFERRED TO YOUR WORK DOMAIN.

YOU'LL FEEL REFRESHED.

WORK DOMAIN.

YOU'LL FEEL REFRESHED.

YOU'LL FEEL MORE PRODUCTIVE.

YOU'LL FEEL REFRESHED.

YOU'LL FEEL MORE PRODUCTIVE.

LOTS OF STUDIES HAVE FOUND THAT YOU'LL FEEL MORE PRODUCTIVE.

LOTS OF STUDIES HAVE FOUND THAT THE DISCONNECTEDNESS FROM WORK LOTS OF STUDIES HAVE FOUND THAT THE DISCONNECTEDNESS FROM WORK HELPS YOU TO RE-ENERGIZE AND THE DISCONNECTEDNESS FROM WORK HELPS YOU TO RE-ENERGIZE AND REJUVENATE YOURSELF HELPS YOU TO RE-ENERGIZE AND REJUVENATE YOURSELF FOR ANOTHER DAY'S WORK.

REJUVENATE YOURSELF FOR ANOTHER DAY'S WORK.

>> SOME EMPLOYERS ARE MAKING FOR ANOTHER DAY'S WORK.

>> SOME EMPLOYERS ARE MAKING SURE EMPLOYEES GET DOWN TIME.

>> SOME EMPLOYERS ARE MAKING SURE EMPLOYEES GET DOWN TIME.

>> SOME ORGANIZATIONS HAVE SURE EMPLOYEES GET DOWN TIME.

>> SOME ORGANIZATIONS HAVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED TECHNOLOGY >> SOME ORGANIZATIONS HAVE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED TECHNOLOGY BLACKOUT PERIODS.

ALREADY IMPLEMENTED TECHNOLOGY BLACKOUT PERIODS.

SO, DURING MAYBE 7 P.M TO 7 A.M. BLACKOUT PERIODS.

SO, DURING MAYBE 7 P.M TO 7 A.M. YOU WON'T RESPOND TO EMAILS.

SO, DURING MAYBE 7 P.M TO 7 A.M. YOU WON'T RESPOND TO EMAILS.

>> SOME PEOPLE SET BOUNDARIES YOU WON'T RESPOND TO EMAILS.

>> SOME PEOPLE SET BOUNDARIES FOR THEMSELVES.

>> SOME PEOPLE SET BOUNDARIES FOR THEMSELVES.

THEY WON'T ANSWER EMAILS OUTSIDE FOR THEMSELVES.

THEY WON'T ANSWER EMAILS OUTSIDE OF BUSINESS HOURS OR TAKE CALLS THEY WON'T ANSWER EMAILS OUTSIDE OF BUSINESS HOURS OR TAKE CALLS DURING DINNER TIME.

OF BUSINESS HOURS OR TAKE CALLS DURING DINNER TIME.

HAVING SEPARATE EMAIL ACCOUNTS DURING DINNER TIME.

HAVING SEPARATE EMAIL ACCOUNTS ALSO HELPS.

HAVING SEPARATE EMAIL ACCOUNTS ALSO HELPS.

BUT EXPECTATIONS ARE NOT ALWAYS ALSO HELPS.

BUT EXPECTATIONS ARE NOT ALWAYS CLEAR.

BUT EXPECTATIONS ARE NOT ALWAYS CLEAR.

>> THERE ARE SITUATIONS WHEN CLEAR.

>> THERE ARE SITUATIONS WHEN YOUR BOSS SENDS YOU AN EMAIL AT >> THERE ARE SITUATIONS WHEN YOUR BOSS SENDS YOU AN EMAIL AT 10 O'CLOCK IN THE NIGHT ARE YOU YOUR BOSS SENDS YOU AN EMAIL AT 10 O'CLOCK IN THE NIGHT ARE YOU EXPECTED TO RESPOND TO IT?

10 O'CLOCK IN THE NIGHT ARE YOU EXPECTED TO RESPOND TO IT?

>> BUT THERE ARE CASES WHERE EXPECTED TO RESPOND TO IT?

>> BUT THERE ARE CASES WHERE TECHNOLOGY AT THE OFFICE IS >> BUT THERE ARE CASES WHERE TECHNOLOGY AT THE OFFICE IS EMPOWERING.

TECHNOLOGY AT THE OFFICE IS EMPOWERING.

>> WHEN PEOPLE TEND TO DO SOME EMPOWERING.

>> WHEN PEOPLE TEND TO DO SOME OF THE PERSONAL TASKS USING >> WHEN PEOPLE TEND TO DO SOME OF THE PERSONAL TASKS USING TECHNOLOGY IN THE WORKPLACE MY OF THE PERSONAL TASKS USING TECHNOLOGY IN THE WORKPLACE MY STUDY FOUND THAT IT ACTUALLY TECHNOLOGY IN THE WORKPLACE MY STUDY FOUND THAT IT ACTUALLY REDUCES THAT WORK-TO-LIFE STUDY FOUND THAT IT ACTUALLY REDUCES THAT WORK-TO-LIFE CONFLICT BECAUSE THE EMPLOYEES REDUCES THAT WORK-TO-LIFE CONFLICT BECAUSE THE EMPLOYEES RELIEVE SOME OF THEIR STRESSES.

CONFLICT BECAUSE THE EMPLOYEES RELIEVE SOME OF THEIR STRESSES.

>> TENAKOON CAN'T DETERMINE FOR RELIEVE SOME OF THEIR STRESSES.

>> TENAKOON CAN'T DETERMINE FOR SURE WHETHER TECHNOLOGY IS >> TENAKOON CAN'T DETERMINE FOR SURE WHETHER TECHNOLOGY IS ENSLAVING OR EMPOWERING.

SURE WHETHER TECHNOLOGY IS ENSLAVING OR EMPOWERING.

SHE SAYS ULTIMATELY, WORK-LIFE ENSLAVING OR EMPOWERING.

SHE SAYS ULTIMATELY, WORK-LIFE BALANCE DEPENDS ON THE SHE SAYS ULTIMATELY, WORK-LIFE BALANCE DEPENDS ON THE INDIVIDUAL.

BALANCE DEPENDS ON THE INDIVIDUAL.

>> I ACTUALLY INTERVIEWED SOME INDIVIDUAL.

>> I ACTUALLY INTERVIEWED SOME PEOPLE WHO QUIT THEIR JOBS >> I ACTUALLY INTERVIEWED SOME PEOPLE WHO QUIT THEIR JOBS BECAUSE THEY DID NOT WANT TO BE PEOPLE WHO QUIT THEIR JOBS BECAUSE THEY DID NOT WANT TO BE IN THE CULTURE ANYMORE.

BECAUSE THEY DID NOT WANT TO BE IN THE CULTURE ANYMORE.

SOMETIMES, PEOPLE CAN TOLERATE IN THE CULTURE ANYMORE.

SOMETIMES, PEOPLE CAN TOLERATE THAT AND NOT BE UNCOMFORTABLE AT SOMETIMES, PEOPLE CAN TOLERATE THAT AND NOT BE UNCOMFORTABLE AT ALL ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE THAT AND NOT BE UNCOMFORTABLE AT ALL ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE YOUNG IN THEIR CAREER.

ALL ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE YOUNG IN THEIR CAREER.

WHEN THEY ARE TRYING TO BUILD YOUNG IN THEIR CAREER.

WHEN THEY ARE TRYING TO BUILD THEIR CAREER UP.

WHEN THEY ARE TRYING TO BUILD THEIR CAREER UP.

BUT, ONCE YOU HAVE OTHER THEIR CAREER UP.

BUT, ONCE YOU HAVE OTHER OBLIGATIONS COMING UP THEN YOUR BUT, ONCE YOU HAVE OTHER OBLIGATIONS COMING UP THEN YOUR DEMAND CHANGES.

OBLIGATIONS COMING UP THEN YOUR DEMAND CHANGES.

>> SO, WHICH IS IT, DEMAND CHANGES.

>> SO, WHICH IS IT, FRANCESCA CHAMBERS >> SO, WHICH IS IT, FRANCESCA CHAMBERS >> NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU ANSWER FRANCESCA CHAMBERS >> NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU ANSWER YOUR E-MAILS OR YOUR PHONE IN >> NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU ANSWER YOUR E-MAILS OR YOUR PHONE IN THE MISSES OF THE NIGHT BUT YOU.

YOUR E-MAILS OR YOUR PHONE IN THE MISSES OF THE NIGHT BUT YOU.

NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU WORK 60 THE MISSES OF THE NIGHT BUT YOU.

NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU WORK 60 HOURS A WEEK BUT YOU.

NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU WORK 60 HOURS A WEEK BUT YOU.

NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU CHOOSE JOB HOURS A WEEK BUT YOU.

NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU CHOOSE JOB OR PROFESSION LIKE THAT BUT YOU.

NO ONE CAN MAKE YOU CHOOSE JOB OR PROFESSION LIKE THAT BUT YOU.

I WAS IN THE NICE INDUSTRY AND OR PROFESSION LIKE THAT BUT YOU.

I WAS IN THE NICE INDUSTRY AND WORK IN POLITICS.

I WAS IN THE NICE INDUSTRY AND WORK IN POLITICS.

I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT I'M GOING WORK IN POLITICS.

I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT I'M GOING TO BE EXPECTED SOMETIMES AROUND I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT I'M GOING TO BE EXPECTED SOMETIMES AROUND THE CLOCK TO WORK AT SOMETHING TO BE EXPECTED SOMETIMES AROUND THE CLOCK TO WORK AT SOMETHING BIG HAPPENS BECAUSE THAT'S MY THE CLOCK TO WORK AT SOMETHING BIG HAPPENS BECAUSE THAT'S MY JOB.

BIG HAPPENS BECAUSE THAT'S MY JOB.

I NEED TO BRING THE NEWS TO YOU.

JOB.

I NEED TO BRING THE NEWS TO YOU.

I CHOSE THAT FOR MYSELF THOSE I NEED TO BRING THE NEWS TO YOU.

I CHOSE THAT FOR MYSELF THOSE ARE THE CONSEQUENCES THAT I HAVE I CHOSE THAT FOR MYSELF THOSE ARE THE CONSEQUENCES THAT I HAVE TO DEAL WITH AS A RESULT.

ARE THE CONSEQUENCES THAT I HAVE TO DEAL WITH AS A RESULT.

>> I AGREE THAT IT'S EMPOWERING.

TO DEAL WITH AS A RESULT.

>> I AGREE THAT IT'S EMPOWERING.

BUT ALSO MEANS THAT PEOPLE HAVE >> I AGREE THAT IT'S EMPOWERING.

BUT ALSO MEANS THAT PEOPLE HAVE GOT TO NOW ACQUIRE A NEW BUT ALSO MEANS THAT PEOPLE HAVE GOT TO NOW ACQUIRE A NEW DISCIPLINE.

GOT TO NOW ACQUIRE A NEW DISCIPLINE.

THE DISCIPLINE WAS BUILT IN DISCIPLINE.

THE DISCIPLINE WAS BUILT IN BEFORE BECAUSE YOU WERE AWAY THE DISCIPLINE WAS BUILT IN BEFORE BECAUSE YOU WERE AWAY FROM WORK.

BEFORE BECAUSE YOU WERE AWAY FROM WORK.

NOW WE SEE THINGS THAT HAVE TO FROM WORK.

NOW WE SEE THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE TROUBLING.

NOW WE SEE THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE TROUBLING.

WHEN YOU SEE PEOPLE CROSSING THE BE TROUBLING.

WHEN YOU SEE PEOPLE CROSSING THE STREET, NOT EVEN LOOKING TO SEE WHEN YOU SEE PEOPLE CROSSING THE STREET, NOT EVEN LOOKING TO SEE WHETHER THEY'RE GOING TO BE STREET, NOT EVEN LOOKING TO SEE WHETHER THEY'RE GOING TO BE KILLED IN ORDER TO LOOK -- YOU WHETHER THEY'RE GOING TO BE KILLED IN ORDER TO LOOK -- YOU KNOW THIS HAS BECOME TOO MUCH.

KILLED IN ORDER TO LOOK -- YOU KNOW THIS HAS BECOME TOO MUCH.

>> THE CITIES HAVE MADE DRIVING KNOW THIS HAS BECOME TOO MUCH.

>> THE CITIES HAVE MADE DRIVING WHILE TEXTING.

>> THE CITIES HAVE MADE DRIVING WHILE TEXTING.

>> BUT NOT WALKING.

WHILE TEXTING.

>> BUT NOT WALKING.

>> NOW THEY HAVE TO GO DO IT FOR >> BUT NOT WALKING.

>> NOW THEY HAVE TO GO DO IT FOR WALKING.

>> NOW THEY HAVE TO GO DO IT FOR WALKING.

>> EVEN WORSE, YOU CAN NOW SIT WALKING.

>> EVEN WORSE, YOU CAN NOW SIT IN MEETING WITH PEOPLE OR EVEN >> EVEN WORSE, YOU CAN NOW SIT IN MEETING WITH PEOPLE OR EVEN IN PELITE CONVERSATION WITH IN MEETING WITH PEOPLE OR EVEN IN PELITE CONVERSATION WITH PEOPLE WHERE THEY FEEL THEY MUST IN PELITE CONVERSATION WITH PEOPLE WHERE THEY FEEL THEY MUST PULL OUT THEIR SMART PHONE.

PEOPLE WHERE THEY FEEL THEY MUST PULL OUT THEIR SMART PHONE.

>> EXCUSE ME, ELEANOR -- I HAVE PULL OUT THEIR SMART PHONE.

>> EXCUSE ME, ELEANOR -- I HAVE MY PHONE.

>> EXCUSE ME, ELEANOR -- I HAVE MY PHONE.

I'M TALKING.

MY PHONE.

I'M TALKING.

>> SOMEBODY WHO HAS -- ALWAYS I'M TALKING.

>> SOMEBODY WHO HAS -- ALWAYS KEEP IN TOUCH, LET ME TELL YOU >> SOMEBODY WHO HAS -- ALWAYS KEEP IN TOUCH, LET ME TELL YOU ONE THING I DO.

KEEP IN TOUCH, LET ME TELL YOU ONE THING I DO.

THERE ARE TIMES WHEN PEOPLE SAY, ONE THING I DO.

THERE ARE TIMES WHEN PEOPLE SAY, DID YOU SEE YOUR E-MAIL, I SAY, THERE ARE TIMES WHEN PEOPLE SAY, DID YOU SEE YOUR E-MAIL, I SAY, NO.

DID YOU SEE YOUR E-MAIL, I SAY, NO.

I'VE BEEN AT WORK ALL DAY I NO.

I'VE BEEN AT WORK ALL DAY I SPENT TURN IT ON BECAUSE I WANT I'VE BEEN AT WORK ALL DAY I SPENT TURN IT ON BECAUSE I WANT TO GET WORK DONE.

SPENT TURN IT ON BECAUSE I WANT TO GET WORK DONE.

EACH HAS TO ACQUIRE AN TO GET WORK DONE.

EACH HAS TO ACQUIRE AN INTERDISCIPLINE THAT WE NEVER EACH HAS TO ACQUIRE AN INTERDISCIPLINE THAT WE NEVER HAD TO GET BEFORE AND I THINK INTERDISCIPLINE THAT WE NEVER HAD TO GET BEFORE AND I THINK IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE I HAD TO GET BEFORE AND I THINK IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE I THINK WE ARE THE GENERATION THAT IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE I THINK WE ARE THE GENERATION THAT IS FASCINATED WITH THESE THINK WE ARE THE GENERATION THAT IS FASCINATED WITH THESE DEVICES.

IS FASCINATED WITH THESE DEVICES.

PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET USED TO DEVICES.

PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET USED TO THESE DEVICES, PEOPLE.

PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET USED TO THESE DEVICES, PEOPLE.

THEY WON'T BE AS DISTRACTING.

THESE DEVICES, PEOPLE.

THEY WON'T BE AS DISTRACTING.

WON'T BE AS NEW AND WE WON'T THEY WON'T BE AS DISTRACTING.

WON'T BE AS NEW AND WE WON'T NEED TO DO IT ANY MORE.

WON'T BE AS NEW AND WE WON'T NEED TO DO IT ANY MORE.

>> ALSO, I THINK THERE'S A WAY NEED TO DO IT ANY MORE.

>> ALSO, I THINK THERE'S A WAY OF CUTTING DOWN ON THE E-MAILS >> ALSO, I THINK THERE'S A WAY OF CUTTING DOWN ON THE E-MAILS YOU SEND OUT.

OF CUTTING DOWN ON THE E-MAILS YOU SEND OUT.

WHAT I STARTED TO DO IF I YOU SEND OUT.

WHAT I STARTED TO DO IF I STARTED AN E-MAIL TO SOMEONE I WHAT I STARTED TO DO IF I STARTED AN E-MAIL TO SOMEONE I SAVE IT AS A DRAFT.

STARTED AN E-MAIL TO SOMEONE I SAVE IT AS A DRAFT.

THEN I THINK THREE MORE REASONS SAVE IT AS A DRAFT.

THEN I THINK THREE MORE REASONS WHY I HAVE TO E-MAIL THEM LIKE THEN I THINK THREE MORE REASONS WHY I HAVE TO E-MAIL THEM LIKE IN THE NEXT THREE HOURS I PUT IT WHY I HAVE TO E-MAIL THEM LIKE IN THE NEXT THREE HOURS I PUT IT ALL IN ONE E-MAIL.

IN THE NEXT THREE HOURS I PUT IT ALL IN ONE E-MAIL.

I THINK JUST AS WE'VE BECOME ALL IN ONE E-MAIL.

I THINK JUST AS WE'VE BECOME MORE SENSITIVE ABOUT PRINTING I THINK JUST AS WE'VE BECOME MORE SENSITIVE ABOUT PRINTING THINGS OUT, WE DON'T HAVE TO MORE SENSITIVE ABOUT PRINTING THINGS OUT, WE DON'T HAVE TO PRINT THAT OUT.

THINGS OUT, WE DON'T HAVE TO PRINT THAT OUT.

I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO START PRINT THAT OUT.

I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO START REALIZING, I DON'T NEED TO SEND I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO START REALIZING, I DON'T NEED TO SEND AN E-MAIL THREE TIMES TODAY I'LL REALIZING, I DON'T NEED TO SEND AN E-MAIL THREE TIMES TODAY I'LL SEND ONE E-MAIL.

AN E-MAIL THREE TIMES TODAY I'LL SEND ONE E-MAIL.

I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU'RE SEND ONE E-MAIL.

I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU'RE SENDING ME E-MAILS.

I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU'RE SENDING ME E-MAILS.

I THINK WE ARE.

SENDING ME E-MAILS.

I THINK WE ARE.

GOING TO BE DISCIPLINE.

I THINK WE ARE.

GOING TO BE DISCIPLINE.

LEARN HOW TO USE IT A LITTLE BIT GOING TO BE DISCIPLINE.

LEARN HOW TO USE IT A LITTLE BIT MORE STRATEGICALLY.

LEARN HOW TO USE IT A LITTLE BIT MORE STRATEGICALLY.

>> I THINK TECHNOLOGY IS MORE STRATEGICALLY.

>> I THINK TECHNOLOGY IS FANTASTIC WITH BEING ABLE TO >> I THINK TECHNOLOGY IS FANTASTIC WITH BEING ABLE TO WORK FROM HOME.

FANTASTIC WITH BEING ABLE TO WORK FROM HOME.

DOING ALL THESE DIFFERENT WORK FROM HOME.

DOING ALL THESE DIFFERENT THINGS.

DOING ALL THESE DIFFERENT THINGS.

IT IS NEW.

THINGS.

IT IS NEW.

I THINK 40 YEARS AGO IF YOU WERE IT IS NEW.

I THINK 40 YEARS AGO IF YOU WERE WALKING AROUND WITH SOMETHING, I THINK 40 YEARS AGO IF YOU WERE WALKING AROUND WITH SOMETHING, HOW ARE YOU WALKING AROUND WITH WALKING AROUND WITH SOMETHING, HOW ARE YOU WALKING AROUND WITH A CALCULATOR.

HOW ARE YOU WALKING AROUND WITH A CALCULATOR.

IT'S STILL SOMEWHAT NEW.

A CALCULATOR.

IT'S STILL SOMEWHAT NEW.

I JUST THINK OF MY GRANDMOTHER IT'S STILL SOMEWHAT NEW.

I JUST THINK OF MY GRANDMOTHER WHEN SHE WAS BORN THERE WAS NOT I JUST THINK OF MY GRANDMOTHER WHEN SHE WAS BORN THERE WAS NOT EVEN TOLL VISION.

WHEN SHE WAS BORN THERE WAS NOT EVEN TOLL VISION.

IT'S ONE OF THESE TECHNOLOGIES EVEN TOLL VISION.

IT'S ONE OF THESE TECHNOLOGIES THAT WE KEEP ADAPTING BUT IT'S IT'S ONE OF THESE TECHNOLOGIES THAT WE KEEP ADAPTING BUT IT'S INDIVIDUALS HAVE TO MAKE THAT WE KEEP ADAPTING BUT IT'S INDIVIDUALS HAVE TO MAKE PERSONAL CHOICES ON WHEN YOU'RE INDIVIDUALS HAVE TO MAKE PERSONAL CHOICES ON WHEN YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE IT, WHEN YOU'RE PERSONAL CHOICES ON WHEN YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE IT, WHEN YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE IT.

GOING TO HAVE IT, WHEN YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE IT.

BUT IN GENERAL IT'S A PLUS FOR NOT GOING TO HAVE IT.

BUT IN GENERAL IT'S A PLUS FOR EVERYTHING.

BUT IN GENERAL IT'S A PLUS FOR EVERYTHING.

>> I COULD BE REAL DISRUPTER FOR EVERYTHING.

>> I COULD BE REAL DISRUPTER FOR FAMILY LIFE.

>> I COULD BE REAL DISRUPTER FOR FAMILY LIFE.

I WORRY ABOUT THAT.

FAMILY LIFE.

I WORRY ABOUT THAT.

BRING KIDS IN TO THE DEVICES I WORRY ABOUT THAT.

BRING KIDS IN TO THE DEVICES WHEN THEY LITERALLY CAN'T TALK BRING KIDS IN TO THE DEVICES WHEN THEY LITERALLY CAN'T TALK YET.

WHEN THEY LITERALLY CAN'T TALK YET.

THAT'S GREAT BECAUSE IT HELPS YET.

THAT'S GREAT BECAUSE IT HELPS WITH THE BRAIN ACTIVITY THAT IS THAT'S GREAT BECAUSE IT HELPS WITH THE BRAIN ACTIVITY THAT IS GOOD.

WITH THE BRAIN ACTIVITY THAT IS GOOD.

AND IT STOPS ACTIVITY AMONG THE GOOD.

AND IT STOPS ACTIVITY AMONG THE FAMILY MEMBERS.

AND IT STOPS ACTIVITY AMONG THE FAMILY MEMBERS.

WHO REALLY HAVE TO GET AHOLD OF FAMILY MEMBERS.

WHO REALLY HAVE TO GET AHOLD OF IT AS A PARENT, IF THEY ARE WHO REALLY HAVE TO GET AHOLD OF IT AS A PARENT, IF THEY ARE GOING TO RAISE TECHNOLOGY IT AS A PARENT, IF THEY ARE GOING TO RAISE TECHNOLOGY GENERATION THAT THEY DON'T CARE GOING TO RAISE TECHNOLOGY GENERATION THAT THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THEM, ISN'T GOING TO PAY GENERATION THAT THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THEM, ISN'T GOING TO PAY ANY ATTENTION BECAUSE THEY WERE ABOUT THEM, ISN'T GOING TO PAY ANY ATTENTION BECAUSE THEY WERE LISTENING TO THEIR DEVICES.

ANY ATTENTION BECAUSE THEY WERE LISTENING TO THEIR DEVICES.

>> AT THE SAME TIME I'M ALWAYS LISTENING TO THEIR DEVICES.

>> AT THE SAME TIME I'M ALWAYS SURPRISED BY 4-YEAR-OLD NEPHEW >> AT THE SAME TIME I'M ALWAYS SURPRISED BY 4-YEAR-OLD NEPHEW NO, SIR HOW TO USE AN iPAD.

SURPRISED BY 4-YEAR-OLD NEPHEW NO, SIR HOW TO USE AN iPAD.

HOW DID YOU GET TO DO THAT?

NO, SIR HOW TO USE AN iPAD.

HOW DID YOU GET TO DO THAT?

AGAIN, I THINK THERE IS PROS AND HOW DID YOU GET TO DO THAT?

AGAIN, I THINK THERE IS PROS AND CONS EVER EVERYTHING IN LIFE.

AGAIN, I THINK THERE IS PROS AND CONS EVER EVERYTHING IN LIFE.

IN GENERAL THIS CAN EMPOWER A CONS EVER EVERYTHING IN LIFE.

IN GENERAL THIS CAN EMPOWER A LOT OF PEOPLE.

IN GENERAL THIS CAN EMPOWER A LOT OF PEOPLE.

ONE OF MY FRIENDS, REALLY FUNNY LOT OF PEOPLE.

ONE OF MY FRIENDS, REALLY FUNNY PICTURE IT WAS AD FOR RADIO ONE OF MY FRIENDS, REALLY FUNNY PICTURE IT WAS AD FOR RADIO SLACK.

PICTURE IT WAS AD FOR RADIO SLACK.

IT HAD LIKE 20 DIFFERENT SLACK.

IT HAD LIKE 20 DIFFERENT DEVICES.

IT HAD LIKE 20 DIFFERENT DEVICES.

MY iPHONE DOES ALL OF THEM.

DEVICES.

MY iPHONE DOES ALL OF THEM.

IT'S KIND OF INCREDIBLE JUST HOW MY iPHONE DOES ALL OF THEM.

IT'S KIND OF INCREDIBLE JUST HOW FAR WE'VE COME.

IT'S KIND OF INCREDIBLE JUST HOW FAR WE'VE COME.

>> THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IS FAR WE'VE COME.

>> THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IS SENDING BOUNDARIES WITH YOUR >> THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IS SENDING BOUNDARIES WITH YOUR BOSS, WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE SENDING BOUNDARIES WITH YOUR BOSS, WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE TIME, DO YOU EXPECT TO E-MAIL AT BOSS, WHAT IS INAPPROPRIATE TIME, DO YOU EXPECT TO E-MAIL AT THIS TIME.

TIME, DO YOU EXPECT TO E-MAIL AT THIS TIME.

AND ALSO IN YOUR LIFE WITH YOUR THIS TIME.

AND ALSO IN YOUR LIFE WITH YOUR HUSBAND OR WIFE.

AND ALSO IN YOUR LIFE WITH YOUR HUSBAND OR WIFE.

MY HUSBAND AND I SET A TIME VERY HUSBAND OR WIFE.

MY HUSBAND AND I SET A TIME VERY SPECIFIC TIME ON THE WEEKEND TO MY HUSBAND AND I SET A TIME VERY SPECIFIC TIME ON THE WEEKEND TO WORK ON WORK STUFF THEN DON'T DO SPECIFIC TIME ON THE WEEKEND TO WORK ON WORK STUFF THEN DON'T DO OUTSIDE THAT HAVE WE HAVE THIS WORK ON WORK STUFF THEN DON'T DO OUTSIDE THAT HAVE WE HAVE THIS TIME TO SPEND WITH EACH OTHER, OUTSIDE THAT HAVE WE HAVE THIS TIME TO SPEND WITH EACH OTHER, THAT'S THE KEY.

TIME TO SPEND WITH EACH OTHER, THAT'S THE KEY.

>> IS THERE A DIFFERENCE WHAT 50 THAT'S THE KEY.

>> IS THERE A DIFFERENCE WHAT 50 YEARS FROM NOW, IF THE PLANET IS >> IS THERE A DIFFERENCE WHAT 50 YEARS FROM NOW, IF THE PLANET IS STILL HERE DESPITE CLIMATE YEARS FROM NOW, IF THE PLANET IS STILL HERE DESPITE CLIMATE CHANGE THAT WHEN EVERYBODY HAS STILL HERE DESPITE CLIMATE CHANGE THAT WHEN EVERYBODY HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP, EVERYBODY HAS CHANGE THAT WHEN EVERYBODY HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP, EVERYBODY HAS BEEN RAISED FULLY VERSED IN BEEN BROUGHT UP, EVERYBODY HAS BEEN RAISED FULLY VERSED IN TECHNOLOGY.

BEEN RAISED FULLY VERSED IN TECHNOLOGY.

WITH IT L BE DIFFERENT THEN?

TECHNOLOGY.

WITH IT L BE DIFFERENT THEN?

>> I DO.

WITH IT L BE DIFFERENT THEN?

>> I DO.

IF YOU LOOK AT JUST HOW THE LAST >> I DO.

IF YOU LOOK AT JUST HOW THE LAST GENERATION STARTED WITH IF YOU LOOK AT JUST HOW THE LAST GENERATION STARTED WITH FACEBOOK.

GENERATION STARTED WITH FACEBOOK.

I THOUGHT FACEBOOK WAS FACEBOOK.

I THOUGHT FACEBOOK WAS INTRODUCED WHEN MY GIRLS WERE I THOUGHT FACEBOOK WAS INTRODUCED WHEN MY GIRLS WERE TEENAGERS, THEY VIEW IT VERY INTRODUCED WHEN MY GIRLS WERE TEENAGERS, THEY VIEW IT VERY DIFFERENTLY NOW.

TEENAGERS, THEY VIEW IT VERY DIFFERENTLY NOW.

THEY WERE OBSESSED WITH IT.

DIFFERENTLY NOW.

THEY WERE OBSESSED WITH IT.

>> JUST LIKE TELEVISION.

THEY WERE OBSESSED WITH IT.

>> JUST LIKE TELEVISION.

>> THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION.

>> JUST LIKE TELEVISION.

>> THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND >> THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.

VISIT OUR WEBSITE PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.

WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, TO PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.

WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, TO THE CONTRARY, SEE YOU NEXT WEEK.

FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN ONLINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN ONLINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE OF "TO THE CONTRARY" PLEASE ONLINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE OF "TO THE CONTRARY" PLEASE VISIT OUR PBS WEBSITE AT OF "TO THE CONTRARY" PLEASE VISIT OUR PBS WEBSITE AT WWW.PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.