>> THIS WEEK ON TO THE >> THIS WEEK ON TO THE CONTRARY... >> THIS WEEK ON TO THE CONTRARY... FIRST, OBAMA AND CLINTON.

CONTRARY... FIRST, OBAMA AND CLINTON.

SHOULD SHE RUN AGAINST HIM ON FIRST, OBAMA AND CLINTON.

SHOULD SHE RUN AGAINST HIM ON WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES?

SHOULD SHE RUN AGAINST HIM ON WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES?

THEN ASYLUM FOR IMMIGRANT WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES?

THEN ASYLUM FOR IMMIGRANT VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE?

THEN ASYLUM FOR IMMIGRANT VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE?

BEHIND THE HEADLINES SHELTERS VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE?

BEHIND THE HEADLINES SHELTERS FOR THE CHILDREN OF INDIAN SEX BEHIND THE HEADLINES SHELTERS FOR THE CHILDREN OF INDIAN SEX WORKERS.

♪] ♪] >> HELLO I'M BONNIE ERBE WELCOME ♪] >> HELLO I'M BONNIE ERBE WELCOME TO TO THE CONTRARY, A DISCUSSION >> HELLO I'M BONNIE ERBE WELCOME TO TO THE CONTRARY, A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL FRIENDS FROM TO TO THE CONTRARY, A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL FRIENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

OF NEWS AND SOCIAL FRIENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST IN HONOR OF LABOR DAY, DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST IN HONOR OF LABOR DAY, OBAMA, CLINTON AND WORKING UP FIRST IN HONOR OF LABOR DAY, OBAMA, CLINTON AND WORKING WOMEN.

OBAMA, CLINTON AND WORKING WOMEN.

THIS WEEK PRESIDENT OBAMA TOUTED WOMEN.

THIS WEEK PRESIDENT OBAMA TOUTED HIS ADMINISTRATION'S SUPPORT FOR THIS WEEK PRESIDENT OBAMA TOUTED HIS ADMINISTRATION'S SUPPORT FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS CITED HIS HIS ADMINISTRATION'S SUPPORT FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS CITED HIS EFFORTS TO FIGHT PAY WOMEN AND GIRLS CITED HIS EFFORTS TO FIGHT PAY DISCRIMINATION AND PROMOTE A EFFORTS TO FIGHT PAY DISCRIMINATION AND PROMOTE A COMPREHENSIVE WORKING FAMILIES DISCRIMINATION AND PROMOTE A COMPREHENSIVE WORKING FAMILIES AGENDA THAT INCLUDES FAMILY COMPREHENSIVE WORKING FAMILIES AGENDA THAT INCLUDES FAMILY FRIENDLY WORKING PLACES.

AGENDA THAT INCLUDES FAMILY FRIENDLY WORKING PLACES.

HILLARY CLINTON SUPPORTERS FRIENDLY WORKING PLACES.

HILLARY CLINTON SUPPORTERS PROMOTED THE FORMER SECRETARY OF HILLARY CLINTON SUPPORTERS PROMOTED THE FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE'S RECORD ON WOMEN AND PROMOTED THE FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE'S RECORD ON WOMEN AND GIRLS AS HER TOP PRIORITY AT THE STATE'S RECORD ON WOMEN AND GIRLS AS HER TOP PRIORITY AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT.

GIRLS AS HER TOP PRIORITY AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT.

CLINTON AND OBAMA WILL BOTH STATE DEPARTMENT.

CLINTON AND OBAMA WILL BOTH APPEAR AT A DNC WOMEN'S FORUM CLINTON AND OBAMA WILL BOTH APPEAR AT A DNC WOMEN'S FORUM NEXT MONTH AND THE QUESTION IS APPEAR AT A DNC WOMEN'S FORUM NEXT MONTH AND THE QUESTION IS SHOULD SHE RUN WITH OR AGAINST NEXT MONTH AND THE QUESTION IS SHOULD SHE RUN WITH OR AGAINST OBAMA'S RECORD ON WORKING SHOULD SHE RUN WITH OR AGAINST OBAMA'S RECORD ON WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES?

OBAMA'S RECORD ON WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES?

CLINTON HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF WOMEN'S ISSUES?

CLINTON HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF PRESIDENT OBAMA'S FOREIGN CLINTON HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF PRESIDENT OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICIES.

PRESIDENT OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICIES.

OTHER DEMOCRATIC SENATE AND POLICIES.

OTHER DEMOCRATIC SENATE AND HOUSE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING OTHER DEMOCRATIC SENATE AND HOUSE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING SO BETSEY WELCOME TO THE SHOW, HOUSE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING SO BETSEY WELCOME TO THE SHOW, SHOULD HILLARY ASSUMING SHE IS SO BETSEY WELCOME TO THE SHOW, SHOULD HILLARY ASSUMING SHE IS RUNNING BE RUNNING AWAY FROM THE SHOULD HILLARY ASSUMING SHE IS RUNNING BE RUNNING AWAY FROM THE PRESIDENT ON WORKING WOMEN'S RUNNING BE RUNNING AWAY FROM THE PRESIDENT ON WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES OR WITH HIM?

PRESIDENT ON WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES OR WITH HIM?

>> SHE SHOULD RUN ON HER OWN ISSUES OR WITH HIM?

>> SHE SHOULD RUN ON HER OWN RECORD.

>> SHE SHOULD RUN ON HER OWN RECORD.

THAT WHAT SHE HAS.

RECORD.

THAT WHAT SHE HAS.

SHE DOES NOT NEED TO RELY ON THAT WHAT SHE HAS.

SHE DOES NOT NEED TO RELY ON ANOTHER PRESIDENT FOR HER SHE DOES NOT NEED TO RELY ON ANOTHER PRESIDENT FOR HER RECORD.

ANOTHER PRESIDENT FOR HER RECORD.

>> I BELIEVE THAT IT WILL BE RECORD.

>> I BELIEVE THAT IT WILL BE DIFFICULT FOR HER TO ERASE THE >> I BELIEVE THAT IT WILL BE DIFFICULT FOR HER TO ERASE THE INCUMBENCY.

DIFFICULT FOR HER TO ERASE THE INCUMBENCY.

SHE WAS PART OF THAT INCUMBENCY.

SHE WAS PART OF THAT ADMINISTRATION AND SHE IS GOING SHE WAS PART OF THAT ADMINISTRATION AND SHE IS GOING TO HAVE TO ANSWER TO THE THINGS ADMINISTRATION AND SHE IS GOING TO HAVE TO ANSWER TO THE THINGS THAT HAPPENED DURING IT.

TO HAVE TO ANSWER TO THE THINGS THAT HAPPENED DURING IT.

>> WELL, I THINK SHE NEEDS TO THAT HAPPENED DURING IT.

>> WELL, I THINK SHE NEEDS TO CONTRAST HERSELF TO HIM.

>> WELL, I THINK SHE NEEDS TO CONTRAST HERSELF TO HIM.

SHE HAS TO BE HER OWN CANDIDATE.

CONTRAST HERSELF TO HIM.

SHE HAS TO BE HER OWN CANDIDATE.

I THINK THAT THE ISSUE FOR HER SHE HAS TO BE HER OWN CANDIDATE.

I THINK THAT THE ISSUE FOR HER IS GOING TO BE HOW TO NAVIGATE I THINK THAT THE ISSUE FOR HER IS GOING TO BE HOW TO NAVIGATE IN A WAY SHE IS HER OWN PERSON IS GOING TO BE HOW TO NAVIGATE IN A WAY SHE IS HER OWN PERSON AND TAKE THE BEST OF PRESIDENT IN A WAY SHE IS HER OWN PERSON AND TAKE THE BEST OF PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE BEST OF HILLARY AND TAKE THE BEST OF PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE BEST OF HILLARY CLINTON.

OBAMA AND THE BEST OF HILLARY CLINTON.

>> OUR COUNTRY HAS HAD A CLINTON.

>> OUR COUNTRY HAS HAD A TENDENCY TO ROTATE THE PARTIES >> OUR COUNTRY HAS HAD A TENDENCY TO ROTATE THE PARTIES BETWEEN THE PARTIES.

TENDENCY TO ROTATE THE PARTIES BETWEEN THE PARTIES.

AND HILLARY IS GOING TO HAVE THE BETWEEN THE PARTIES.

AND HILLARY IS GOING TO HAVE THE SHADOW CAST OVER HER CAMPAIGN NO AND HILLARY IS GOING TO HAVE THE SHADOW CAST OVER HER CAMPAIGN NO MATTER WHAT.

SHADOW CAST OVER HER CAMPAIGN NO MATTER WHAT.

>> SHE HAS BEEN DOING IT MATTER WHAT.

>> SHE HAS BEEN DOING IT SUCCESSFULLY ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS >> SHE HAS BEEN DOING IT SUCCESSFULLY ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS SO FAR.

SUCCESSFULLY ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS SO FAR.

HOW CAN SHE TELL US YOU KNOW SO FAR.

HOW CAN SHE TELL US YOU KNOW WHAT HAS PRESIDENT OBAMA DONE ON HOW CAN SHE TELL US YOU KNOW WHAT HAS PRESIDENT OBAMA DONE ON WOMEN'S WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES WHAT HAS PRESIDENT OBAMA DONE ON WOMEN'S WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES PARTICULARLY AND HOW CAN SHE DO WOMEN'S WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES PARTICULARLY AND HOW CAN SHE DO MORE OR DIFFERENT?

PARTICULARLY AND HOW CAN SHE DO MORE OR DIFFERENT?

>> YES, IT WILL BE HARD.

MORE OR DIFFERENT?

>> YES, IT WILL BE HARD.

THE ADMINISTRATION ISSUED A >> YES, IT WILL BE HARD.

THE ADMINISTRATION ISSUED A STATEMENT IN WHICH THEY LISTED THE ADMINISTRATION ISSUED A STATEMENT IN WHICH THEY LISTED 46 PROGRAMS THAT RANGE FROM STATEMENT IN WHICH THEY LISTED 46 PROGRAMS THAT RANGE FROM PROGRAMS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF 46 PROGRAMS THAT RANGE FROM PROGRAMS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR IN TERMS OF PAY EXWI IT, PROGRAMS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR IN TERMS OF PAY EXWI IT, THE DEPARTMENT OF OFFENSE, LABOR IN TERMS OF PAY EXWI IT, THE DEPARTMENT OF OFFENSE, EQUITY ISSUES AND COMBAT THE DEPARTMENT OF OFFENSE, EQUITY ISSUES AND COMBAT POLICIES AND ALL THE STATE EQUITY ISSUES AND COMBAT POLICIES AND ALL THE STATE DEPARTMENT POLICIES THAT HILLARY POLICIES AND ALL THE STATE DEPARTMENT POLICIES THAT HILLARY LISTED AS HER OWN APOLICEMENTS.

DEPARTMENT POLICIES THAT HILLARY LISTED AS HER OWN APOLICEMENTS.

THIS IS A ADMINISTRATION THAT LISTED AS HER OWN APOLICEMENTS.

THIS IS A ADMINISTRATION THAT HAS A SOLID RECORD ON WOMEN AND THIS IS A ADMINISTRATION THAT HAS A SOLID RECORD ON WOMEN AND SHE NEEDS TO BUILD ON T SHE HAS HAS A SOLID RECORD ON WOMEN AND SHE NEEDS TO BUILD ON T SHE HAS HER OWN EXPERIENCES AS A FIRST SHE NEEDS TO BUILD ON T SHE HAS HER OWN EXPERIENCES AS A FIRST LADY AND A SENATOR AND SHE HAS A HER OWN EXPERIENCES AS A FIRST LADY AND A SENATOR AND SHE HAS A LOT OF DOMESTIC EXPERIENCE THAT LADY AND A SENATOR AND SHE HAS A LOT OF DOMESTIC EXPERIENCE THAT SHE CAN BRING TO BEAR WHEN LOT OF DOMESTIC EXPERIENCE THAT SHE CAN BRING TO BEAR WHEN DESCRIBING WHAT SHE IS GOING TO SHE CAN BRING TO BEAR WHEN DESCRIBING WHAT SHE IS GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO FOR WOMEN.

DESCRIBING WHAT SHE IS GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO FOR WOMEN.

>> BETSEY?

BE ABLE TO DO FOR WOMEN.

>> BETSEY?

>> I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS YOU >> BETSEY?

>> I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS YOU ARE COMPARING APPLES AND >> I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS YOU ARE COMPARING APPLES AND ORANGES.

ARE COMPARING APPLES AND ORANGES.

OBAMA HAS THE ENTIRE FEDERAL ORANGES.

OBAMA HAS THE ENTIRE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AT HIS CALLING.

OBAMA HAS THE ENTIRE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AT HIS CALLING.

SHE WAS IN THE SENATE FOR EIGHT GOVERNMENT AT HIS CALLING.

SHE WAS IN THE SENATE FOR EIGHT YEARS.

SHE WAS IN THE SENATE FOR EIGHT YEARS.

SHE SAT ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND YEARS.

SHE SAT ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND SHE WAS ON DEFENSE AND SHE SAT ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND SHE WAS ON DEFENSE AND ENVIRONMENT.

SHE WAS ON DEFENSE AND ENVIRONMENT.

THOSE ARE DIFFERENT ISSUES AND ENVIRONMENT.

THOSE ARE DIFFERENT ISSUES AND NOT AS EASY TO GET WORKING THOSE ARE DIFFERENT ISSUES AND NOT AS EASY TO GET WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES INTO IT.

NOT AS EASY TO GET WORKING WOMEN'S ISSUES INTO IT.

AND THE STATE DEPARTMENT, WOMEN'S ISSUES INTO IT.

AND THE STATE DEPARTMENT, THOUGH, AND SHE PUSHED VERY HARD AND THE STATE DEPARTMENT, THOUGH, AND SHE PUSHED VERY HARD EVERY TRIP SHE HAD TO MAKE SURE THOUGH, AND SHE PUSHED VERY HARD EVERY TRIP SHE HAD TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS SOME KIND OF AN EVERY TRIP SHE HAD TO MAKE SURE THERE WAS SOME KIND OF AN ACCOMPLISHMENT FOR WOMEN THERE WAS SOME KIND OF AN ACCOMPLISHMENT FOR WOMEN INITIATIVES.

ACCOMPLISHMENT FOR WOMEN INITIATIVES.

YOU GO TO THE DIVERSITY.

INITIATIVES.

YOU GO TO THE DIVERSITY.

SHE LOOKED AT GIRLS IN AFRICA.

YOU GO TO THE DIVERSITY.

SHE LOOKED AT GIRLS IN AFRICA.

SHE WORKED ON TRADE MISSIONS IN SHE LOOKED AT GIRLS IN AFRICA.

SHE WORKED ON TRADE MISSIONS IN ASIA.

SHE WORKED ON TRADE MISSIONS IN ASIA.

ALL OF THESE THINGS I THINK IS ASIA.

ALL OF THESE THINGS I THINK IS SOMETHING SHE CAN TALK ABOUT AS ALL OF THESE THINGS I THINK IS SOMETHING SHE CAN TALK ABOUT AS SHE STARTS TO RUN.

SOMETHING SHE CAN TALK ABOUT AS SHE STARTS TO RUN.

>> WHAT ADVICE WOULD YOU BE SHE STARTS TO RUN.

>> WHAT ADVICE WOULD YOU BE GIVING HER.

>> WHAT ADVICE WOULD YOU BE GIVING HER.

>> DEAR HILLARY, TELL ME 10 GIVING HER.

>> DEAR HILLARY, TELL ME 10 THINGS THAT YOU DIFFER WITH FROM >> DEAR HILLARY, TELL ME 10 THINGS THAT YOU DIFFER WITH FROM PRESIDENT OBAMA ON.

THINGS THAT YOU DIFFER WITH FROM PRESIDENT OBAMA ON.

TELL ME THAT?

PRESIDENT OBAMA ON.

TELL ME THAT?

THAT IS GOING TO MAKE MY JOB TELL ME THAT?

THAT IS GOING TO MAKE MY JOB HARDER BECAUSE I WILL TRY TO THAT IS GOING TO MAKE MY JOB HARDER BECAUSE I WILL TRY TO LINK HER TO THIS PRESIDENT AS HARDER BECAUSE I WILL TRY TO LINK HER TO THIS PRESIDENT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

LINK HER TO THIS PRESIDENT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

>> RIGHT.

MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

>> RIGHT.

AND CALLING IT OBAMA -- >> RIGHT.

AND CALLING IT OBAMA -- >> WE LOOK AT THAT AND SAY THESE AND CALLING IT OBAMA -- >> WE LOOK AT THAT AND SAY THESE ARE THE SAME POLICIES.

>> WE LOOK AT THAT AND SAY THESE ARE THE SAME POLICIES.

THERE WILL BE A BIT OF THE BRAIN ARE THE SAME POLICIES.

THERE WILL BE A BIT OF THE BRAIN DRAIN HOW ARE THEY GOING TO GET THERE WILL BE A BIT OF THE BRAIN DRAIN HOW ARE THEY GOING TO GET THE BEST PEOPLE OUT OF THE PARTY DRAIN HOW ARE THEY GOING TO GET THE BEST PEOPLE OUT OF THE PARTY WHEN YOU HAVE HAD TWO TERMS WITH THE BEST PEOPLE OUT OF THE PARTY WHEN YOU HAVE HAD TWO TERMS WITH YOUR GUY.

WHEN YOU HAVE HAD TWO TERMS WITH YOUR GUY.

IT WILL BE A TOUGH CASE.

YOUR GUY.

IT WILL BE A TOUGH CASE.

SHE IS DARNED IF SHE DOES AND IT WILL BE A TOUGH CASE.

SHE IS DARNED IF SHE DOES AND DARNED IF SHE DOESN'T.

SHE IS DARNED IF SHE DOES AND DARNED IF SHE DOESN'T.

>> IT'S GREAT TO SUPPORT WOMEN'S DARNED IF SHE DOESN'T.

>> IT'S GREAT TO SUPPORT WOMEN'S ISSUES AND IMPLEMENT LAWS THAT >> IT'S GREAT TO SUPPORT WOMEN'S ISSUES AND IMPLEMENT LAWS THAT ARE SUPPORTIVE OF WOMEN'S NEEDS.

ISSUES AND IMPLEMENT LAWS THAT ARE SUPPORTIVE OF WOMEN'S NEEDS.

THAT BEING SAID IT'S IMPORTANT ARE SUPPORTIVE OF WOMEN'S NEEDS.

THAT BEING SAID IT'S IMPORTANT FOR IF SHE SHOULD RUN THAT SHE THAT BEING SAID IT'S IMPORTANT FOR IF SHE SHOULD RUN THAT SHE USE THE OTHER HER OTHER ASSETS.

FOR IF SHE SHOULD RUN THAT SHE USE THE OTHER HER OTHER ASSETS.

SHE WAS IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT.

USE THE OTHER HER OTHER ASSETS.

SHE WAS IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT.

SHE NEEDS TO SAY WHAT SHE DID SHE WAS IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT.

SHE NEEDS TO SAY WHAT SHE DID WHILE SHE WAS THERE WAS SHE SHE NEEDS TO SAY WHAT SHE DID WHILE SHE WAS THERE WAS SHE SUCCESSFUL.

WHILE SHE WAS THERE WAS SHE SUCCESSFUL.

HAVING A LIST OF 46 PROGRAMS SUCCESSFUL.

HAVING A LIST OF 46 PROGRAMS IMPLEMENTED WE DON'T NECESSARILY HAVING A LIST OF 46 PROGRAMS IMPLEMENTED WE DON'T NECESSARILY KNOW HOW SUCCESSFUL OR NOT IMPLEMENTED WE DON'T NECESSARILY KNOW HOW SUCCESSFUL OR NOT SUCCESSFUL THEY ARE.

KNOW HOW SUCCESSFUL OR NOT SUCCESSFUL THEY ARE.

WE DON'T KNOW THE OUTCOMES AND SUCCESSFUL THEY ARE.

WE DON'T KNOW THE OUTCOMES AND PROBABLY WON'T KNOW FOR A WE DON'T KNOW THE OUTCOMES AND PROBABLY WON'T KNOW FOR A LONGTIME BUT IT'S IMPORTANT THAT PROBABLY WON'T KNOW FOR A LONGTIME BUT IT'S IMPORTANT THAT SHE HAS TO SHOW THAT SHE IS ALL LONGTIME BUT IT'S IMPORTANT THAT SHE HAS TO SHOW THAT SHE IS ALL ENCOMPASSING CANDIDATE NOT JUST SHE HAS TO SHOW THAT SHE IS ALL ENCOMPASSING CANDIDATE NOT JUST ON ONE ISSUE ALONE.

ENCOMPASSING CANDIDATE NOT JUST ON ONE ISSUE ALONE.

>> AND I WOULD SAY MY ISSUE WITH ON ONE ISSUE ALONE.

>> AND I WOULD SAY MY ISSUE WITH OBAMA IS NOT SO MUCH WITH THE >> AND I WOULD SAY MY ISSUE WITH OBAMA IS NOT SO MUCH WITH THE POLICIES AS HIS OFTENNING.

OBAMA IS NOT SO MUCH WITH THE POLICIES AS HIS OFTENNING.

I THINK HE IS BEING WEAK ON POLICIES AS HIS OFTENNING.

I THINK HE IS BEING WEAK ON GOVERNING.

I THINK HE IS BEING WEAK ON GOVERNING.

AND THAT WAS ALWAYS A CONCERN.

GOVERNING.

AND THAT WAS ALWAYS A CONCERN.

I WAS A BIG HILLARY SUPPORTER AND THAT WAS ALWAYS A CONCERN.

I WAS A BIG HILLARY SUPPORTER UNTIL THE END AND I FELT IT WAS I WAS A BIG HILLARY SUPPORTER UNTIL THE END AND I FELT IT WAS MY BIG CONCERN AND IT CAME TRUE.

UNTIL THE END AND I FELT IT WAS MY BIG CONCERN AND IT CAME TRUE.

HE WAS NOT SOMEONE THAT HAD MY BIG CONCERN AND IT CAME TRUE.

HE WAS NOT SOMEONE THAT HAD EXPERIENCE.

HE WAS NOT SOMEONE THAT HAD EXPERIENCE.

SHE HAS VAST EXPERIENCE.

EXPERIENCE.

SHE HAS VAST EXPERIENCE.

AND SHE HAS SHOWN SHE IS A GOOD SHE HAS VAST EXPERIENCE.

AND SHE HAS SHOWN SHE IS A GOOD ADMINISTRATOR SHE WAS A GOOD AND SHE HAS SHOWN SHE IS A GOOD ADMINISTRATOR SHE WAS A GOOD SECRETARY OF STATE SHE WAS AN ADMINISTRATOR SHE WAS A GOOD SECRETARY OF STATE SHE WAS AN EFFECTIVE POSITIVE SENATOR.

SECRETARY OF STATE SHE WAS AN EFFECTIVE POSITIVE SENATOR.

SHE HAS TO BE ON THE RECORD SHE EFFECTIVE POSITIVE SENATOR.

SHE HAS TO BE ON THE RECORD SHE IS AN EFFECTIVE PERSON IN ALL SHE HAS TO BE ON THE RECORD SHE IS AN EFFECTIVE PERSON IN ALL THE JOBS SHE HAS HELD.

IS AN EFFECTIVE PERSON IN ALL THE JOBS SHE HAS HELD.

>> LET'S SWITCH TO WOMEN RUNNING THE JOBS SHE HAS HELD.

>> LET'S SWITCH TO WOMEN RUNNING FOR THE SENATE AND OF COURSE THE >> LET'S SWITCH TO WOMEN RUNNING FOR THE SENATE AND OF COURSE THE BIG QUESTION POLITICALLY RIGHT FOR THE SENATE AND OF COURSE THE BIG QUESTION POLITICALLY RIGHT NOW IS WILL THE SENATE REMAIN IN BIG QUESTION POLITICALLY RIGHT NOW IS WILL THE SENATE REMAIN IN DEMOCRATIC HANDS OR SWITCH OVER NOW IS WILL THE SENATE REMAIN IN DEMOCRATIC HANDS OR SWITCH OVER TO REPUBLICANS.

DEMOCRATIC HANDS OR SWITCH OVER TO REPUBLICANS.

WHAT AND I'VE SEEN POLLS KAY TO REPUBLICANS.

WHAT AND I'VE SEEN POLLS KAY HAGEN ONE POLL OUT THIS WEEK WHAT AND I'VE SEEN POLLS KAY HAGEN ONE POLL OUT THIS WEEK SHOWED HER TWO POINTS AHEAD OF HAGEN ONE POLL OUT THIS WEEK SHOWED HER TWO POINTS AHEAD OF HER REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER IN SHOWED HER TWO POINTS AHEAD OF HER REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER IN NORTH CAROLINA.

HER REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER IN NORTH CAROLINA.

WHEREAS A MONTH AGO SHE WAS 10 NORTH CAROLINA.

WHEREAS A MONTH AGO SHE WAS 10 POINTS BEHIND.

WHEREAS A MONTH AGO SHE WAS 10 POINTS BEHIND.

WHAT IS GOING ON THERE?

POINTS BEHIND.

WHAT IS GOING ON THERE?

>> I THINK PEOPLE ARE BEGINNING WHAT IS GOING ON THERE?

>> I THINK PEOPLE ARE BEGINNING TO WAKE UP.

>> I THINK PEOPLE ARE BEGINNING TO WAKE UP.

LABOR DAY IS THE START OF ANY TO WAKE UP.

LABOR DAY IS THE START OF ANY CAMPAIGN.

LABOR DAY IS THE START OF ANY CAMPAIGN.

AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT, MANY OF CAMPAIGN.

AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT, MANY OF THE PEOPLE HAVE HEARD NOTHING AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT, MANY OF THE PEOPLE HAVE HEARD NOTHING BUT NEGATIVES AS THE OUTSIDE THE PEOPLE HAVE HEARD NOTHING BUT NEGATIVES AS THE OUTSIDE MONEY HAS BEEN FLOODING INTO THE BUT NEGATIVES AS THE OUTSIDE MONEY HAS BEEN FLOODING INTO THE TARGETED STATES.

MONEY HAS BEEN FLOODING INTO THE TARGETED STATES.

WHAT YOU WILL SEE IS NOT SO MUCH TARGETED STATES.

WHAT YOU WILL SEE IS NOT SO MUCH WINNING CANDIDATES MAKING THE WHAT YOU WILL SEE IS NOT SO MUCH WINNING CANDIDATES MAKING THE DIFFERENCE BUT WOMEN VOTERS.

WINNING CANDIDATES MAKING THE DIFFERENCE BUT WOMEN VOTERS.

BECAUSE TRADITIONALLY WOMEN DIFFERENCE BUT WOMEN VOTERS.

BECAUSE TRADITIONALLY WOMEN VOTERS HAVE GONE TO DEMOCRATIC BECAUSE TRADITIONALLY WOMEN VOTERS HAVE GONE TO DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES.

VOTERS HAVE GONE TO DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES.

THERE WAS A SURVEY JUST DONE BY CANDIDATES.

THERE WAS A SURVEY JUST DONE BY CROSSROADS WHICH ACKNOWLEDGES THERE WAS A SURVEY JUST DONE BY CROSSROADS WHICH ACKNOWLEDGES THIS.

CROSSROADS WHICH ACKNOWLEDGES THIS.

TALKS ABOUT HOW THE REPUBLICAN THIS.

TALKS ABOUT HOW THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS SEEN AS OUT OF TOUCH TALKS ABOUT HOW THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS SEEN AS OUT OF TOUCH AND INSENSITIVE TO WOMEN'S PARTY IS SEEN AS OUT OF TOUCH AND INSENSITIVE TO WOMEN'S ISSUES THAT WILL PLAY INTO THE AND INSENSITIVE TO WOMEN'S ISSUES THAT WILL PLAY INTO THE RACE MORE THAN ANY INDIVIDUAL ISSUES THAT WILL PLAY INTO THE RACE MORE THAN ANY INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE.

RACE MORE THAN ANY INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE.

>> WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER WOMEN CANDIDATE.

>> WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER WOMEN SENATORS?

>> WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER WOMEN SENATORS?

HOW IS FOR EXAMPLE, LOUISIANA SENATORS?

HOW IS FOR EXAMPLE, LOUISIANA SENATOR DOING WHO HAD IS HAVING HOW IS FOR EXAMPLE, LOUISIANA SENATOR DOING WHO HAD IS HAVING MARY WHO IS HAVING A TERRIBLE SENATOR DOING WHO HAD IS HAVING MARY WHO IS HAVING A TERRIBLE TIME FOR A WHILE.

MARY WHO IS HAVING A TERRIBLE TIME FOR A WHILE.

>> I WOULD NEVER USE LOUISIANA TIME FOR A WHILE.

>> I WOULD NEVER USE LOUISIANA AS AN EXAMPLE FOR THE REST OF >> I WOULD NEVER USE LOUISIANA AS AN EXAMPLE FOR THE REST OF THE UNITED STATES.

AS AN EXAMPLE FOR THE REST OF THE UNITED STATES.

THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT ELECTION THE UNITED STATES.

THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT ELECTION CYCLE.

THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT ELECTION CYCLE.

LIKELY WILL GO TO A RUNOFF AT CYCLE.

LIKELY WILL GO TO A RUNOFF AT WHICH CASE ALL BETS ARE OFF LIKELY WILL GO TO A RUNOFF AT WHICH CASE ALL BETS ARE OFF BECAUSE IT BECOMES A NATIONAL WHICH CASE ALL BETS ARE OFF BECAUSE IT BECOMES A NATIONAL EFFORT TO SAVE THE SENATE OR BECAUSE IT BECOMES A NATIONAL EFFORT TO SAVE THE SENATE OR SAVE US FROM THE NIGHTMARE OF EFFORT TO SAVE THE SENATE OR SAVE US FROM THE NIGHTMARE OF PARTY SWITCHERS.

SAVE US FROM THE NIGHTMARE OF PARTY SWITCHERS.

THERE WILL BE SO MUCH MONEY PARTY SWITCHERS.

THERE WILL BE SO MUCH MONEY FLOODED IN COME NOVEMBER WHO THERE WILL BE SO MUCH MONEY FLOODED IN COME NOVEMBER WHO KNOWS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.

FLOODED IN COME NOVEMBER WHO KNOWS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.

>> DEMOCRATS DID NOT EXPECT KNOWS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN.

>> DEMOCRATS DID NOT EXPECT THIS.

>> DEMOCRATS DID NOT EXPECT THIS.

THE REPUBLICANS WERE GOING TO THIS.

THE REPUBLICANS WERE GOING TO WIN THE SENATE.

THE REPUBLICANS WERE GOING TO WIN THE SENATE.

WE ARE.

WIN THE SENATE.

WE ARE.

THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TO COME AT WE ARE.

THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TO COME AT THIS WITH A LOT OF MONEY WITH THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TO COME AT THIS WITH A LOT OF MONEY WITH THIS UNEXPECTED NEW SEATS UP FOR THIS WITH A LOT OF MONEY WITH THIS UNEXPECTED NEW SEATS UP FOR GRABS PROBABLY TAKE THEM OVER.

THIS UNEXPECTED NEW SEATS UP FOR GRABS PROBABLY TAKE THEM OVER.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS GOING GRABS PROBABLY TAKE THEM OVER.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS GOING TO MEAN MOVING FORWARD FOR I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS GOING TO MEAN MOVING FORWARD FOR WOMEN.

TO MEAN MOVING FORWARD FOR WOMEN.

I HOPE IT ENCOURAGES WOMEN TO WOMEN.

I HOPE IT ENCOURAGES WOMEN TO RUN AND SAY WE HAVE BOTH HOUSES I HOPE IT ENCOURAGES WOMEN TO RUN AND SAY WE HAVE BOTH HOUSES LET'S DO IT.

RUN AND SAY WE HAVE BOTH HOUSES LET'S DO IT.

LET ME STEP UP TO THE PLATE AND LET'S DO IT.

LET ME STEP UP TO THE PLATE AND THAT IS WHERE I WANT TO SEE MORE LET ME STEP UP TO THE PLATE AND THAT IS WHERE I WANT TO SEE MORE WOMEN CANDIDATES.

THAT IS WHERE I WANT TO SEE MORE WOMEN CANDIDATES.

WHO DO YOU THINK THE WEAKEST WOMEN CANDIDATES.

WHO DO YOU THINK THE WEAKEST DEMOCRATIC SENATORS ARE?

WHO DO YOU THINK THE WEAKEST DEMOCRATIC SENATORS ARE?

>> THE WEAKEST IT'S DIFFICULT TO DEMOCRATIC SENATORS ARE?

>> THE WEAKEST IT'S DIFFICULT TO COME OUT AND SAY.

>> THE WEAKEST IT'S DIFFICULT TO COME OUT AND SAY.

I DON'T WANT TO NAIL ANYBODY.

COME OUT AND SAY.

I DON'T WANT TO NAIL ANYBODY.

LAND DREW IS A BIG ONE AND I DON'T WANT TO NAIL ANYBODY.

LAND DREW IS A BIG ONE AND RESIDENCY IS A BIG ONE.

LAND DREW IS A BIG ONE AND RESIDENCY IS A BIG ONE.

>> AND IS OBAMACARE STILL A BIG RESIDENCY IS A BIG ONE.

>> AND IS OBAMACARE STILL A BIG ISSUE IN THE STATES?

>> AND IS OBAMACARE STILL A BIG ISSUE IN THE STATES?

>> I DON'T THINK IT IS A BIG ISSUE IN THE STATES?

>> I DON'T THINK IT IS A BIG ISSUE IN EVERY STATE.

>> I DON'T THINK IT IS A BIG ISSUE IN EVERY STATE.

WE ARE MESSAGING OFF OF ISSUE IN EVERY STATE.

WE ARE MESSAGING OFF OF OBAMACARE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WE ARE MESSAGING OFF OF OBAMACARE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HOW WE CAN RIP IT APART AND WE OBAMACARE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HOW WE CAN RIP IT APART AND WE CANNOT REPEAL WE WILL RIP IT HOW WE CAN RIP IT APART AND WE CANNOT REPEAL WE WILL RIP IT APART AND THAT WHAT IS GOING TO CANNOT REPEAL WE WILL RIP IT APART AND THAT WHAT IS GOING TO HAVE TO HAPPEN.

APART AND THAT WHAT IS GOING TO HAVE TO HAPPEN.

>> YOU KNOW, YOU WERE TALKING HAVE TO HAPPEN.

>> YOU KNOW, YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT HAVING MORE WOMEN >> YOU KNOW, YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT HAVING MORE WOMEN CANDIDATES AND I HOPE WE START ABOUT HAVING MORE WOMEN CANDIDATES AND I HOPE WE START TO SEE THAT TREND.

CANDIDATES AND I HOPE WE START TO SEE THAT TREND.

IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT SO MANY TO SEE THAT TREND.

IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT SO MANY WOMEN WHO MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT SO MANY WOMEN WHO MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN RUNNING DON'T GET THE FINANCIAL WOMEN WHO MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN RUNNING DON'T GET THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

RUNNING DON'T GET THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

PARTICULARLY I HAVE TO SAY EVEN SUPPORT.

PARTICULARLY I HAVE TO SAY EVEN IN THE G.O.P..

PARTICULARLY I HAVE TO SAY EVEN IN THE G.O.P..

THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTIVE OF WOMEN IN THE G.O.P..

THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTIVE OF WOMEN CANDIDATES OR MINORITY THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTIVE OF WOMEN CANDIDATES OR MINORITY CANDIDATES.

CANDIDATES OR MINORITY CANDIDATES.

I MEAN IT'S ALWAYS LOOKING AT CANDIDATES.

I MEAN IT'S ALWAYS LOOKING AT WHO CAN WIN RATHER THAN LIFTING I MEAN IT'S ALWAYS LOOKING AT WHO CAN WIN RATHER THAN LIFTING PEOPLE UP SO THEY CAN HAVE THE WHO CAN WIN RATHER THAN LIFTING PEOPLE UP SO THEY CAN HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RUN.

PEOPLE UP SO THEY CAN HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO RUN.

IF THEY DON'T WIN THEY DON'T WIN OPPORTUNITY TO RUN.

IF THEY DON'T WIN THEY DON'T WIN BUT YOU WANT TO GET YOUR MESSAGE IF THEY DON'T WIN THEY DON'T WIN BUT YOU WANT TO GET YOUR MESSAGE OUT.

BUT YOU WANT TO GET YOUR MESSAGE OUT.

AND IT WOULD BE WONDERFUL TO SEE OUT.

AND IT WOULD BE WONDERFUL TO SEE MORE WOMEN IN THAT ROLE.

AND IT WOULD BE WONDERFUL TO SEE MORE WOMEN IN THAT ROLE.

>> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

MORE WOMEN IN THAT ROLE.

>> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER@BONNIE >> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER@BONNIE ERBE.

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER@BONNIE ERBE.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, TWO ERBE.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, TWO DEVELOPMENTS PROVE IT'S BEING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, TWO DEVELOPMENTS PROVE IT'S BEING TAKEN MORE SERIOUSLY.

DEVELOPMENTS PROVE IT'S BEING TAKEN MORE SERIOUSLY.

FIRST, THE NFL TOUGHENED ITS TAKEN MORE SERIOUSLY.

FIRST, THE NFL TOUGHENED ITS POLICY IN PLAYERS WHO ENGAGE IN FIRST, THE NFL TOUGHENED ITS POLICY IN PLAYERS WHO ENGAGE IN DOMESTIC ABUSE REACTING TO POLICY IN PLAYERS WHO ENGAGE IN DOMESTIC ABUSE REACTING TO CRITICISM OF A TWO-GAME DOMESTIC ABUSE REACTING TO CRITICISM OF A TWO-GAME SUSPENSION FOR RAY RICE, THE CRITICISM OF A TWO-GAME SUSPENSION FOR RAY RICE, THE LEAGUE WILL NOW SUSPEND SUSPENSION FOR RAY RICE, THE LEAGUE WILL NOW SUSPEND OFFENDERS FOR SIX GAMES THE LEAGUE WILL NOW SUSPEND OFFENDERS FOR SIX GAMES THE FIRST TIME AND A LIFETIME BAN OFFENDERS FOR SIX GAMES THE FIRST TIME AND A LIFETIME BAN FOR A SECOND OFFENSE.

FIRST TIME AND A LIFETIME BAN FOR A SECOND OFFENSE.

AND FOR THE FIRST TIME, AN FOR A SECOND OFFENSE.

AND FOR THE FIRST TIME, AN IMMIGRATION BOARD RULED THAT A AND FOR THE FIRST TIME, AN IMMIGRATION BOARD RULED THAT A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MAY IMMIGRATION BOARD RULED THAT A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MAY BE GRANTED ASYLUM IN THE UNITED VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MAY BE GRANTED ASYLUM IN THE UNITED STATES.

BE GRANTED ASYLUM IN THE UNITED STATES.

THE CASE INVOLVES A GUATEMALAN STATES.

THE CASE INVOLVES A GUATEMALAN WOMAN WHO FLED HER ABUSIVE THE CASE INVOLVES A GUATEMALAN WOMAN WHO FLED HER ABUSIVE HUSBAND AND COUNTRY IN 2005.

WOMAN WHO FLED HER ABUSIVE HUSBAND AND COUNTRY IN 2005.

SHE SAYS THE LOCAL POLICE HUSBAND AND COUNTRY IN 2005.

SHE SAYS THE LOCAL POLICE OFFERED HER NO SUPPORT OR SHE SAYS THE LOCAL POLICE OFFERED HER NO SUPPORT OR SECURITY.

OFFERED HER NO SUPPORT OR SECURITY.

WHILE HER CASE WILL BE HEARD, SECURITY.

WHILE HER CASE WILL BE HEARD, THERE'S NO GUARANTEE SHE WILL WHILE HER CASE WILL BE HEARD, THERE'S NO GUARANTEE SHE WILL WIN.

THERE'S NO GUARANTEE SHE WILL WIN.

SHE AND THOUSANDS OF OTHERS WIN.

SHE AND THOUSANDS OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED MUST FIRST SHE AND THOUSANDS OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED MUST FIRST PROVE THEY WERE ABUSED AND THAT SIMILARLY SITUATED MUST FIRST PROVE THEY WERE ABUSED AND THAT THEIR COUNTRIES DO NOT PROTECT PROVE THEY WERE ABUSED AND THAT THEIR COUNTRIES DO NOT PROTECT THEM FROM ABUSE.

THEIR COUNTRIES DO NOT PROTECT THEM FROM ABUSE.

IMMIGRATION LAWYERS SAY THESE THEM FROM ABUSE.

IMMIGRATION LAWYERS SAY THESE CASES TAKE MANY YEARS TO DECIDE.

IMMIGRATION LAWYERS SAY THESE CASES TAKE MANY YEARS TO DECIDE.

WHILE PLAINTIFFS ARE ALLOWED TO CASES TAKE MANY YEARS TO DECIDE.

WHILE PLAINTIFFS ARE ALLOWED TO REMAIN IN THE U.S WHILE PLAINTIFFS ARE ALLOWED TO REMAIN IN THE U.S SO LET'S START FIRST WITH THE REMAIN IN THE U.S SO LET'S START FIRST WITH THE ASYLUM ISSUE AND GET TO THE NFL.

SO LET'S START FIRST WITH THE ASYLUM ISSUE AND GET TO THE NFL.

IS THIS A VICTORY FOR WOMEN IN ASYLUM ISSUE AND GET TO THE NFL.

IS THIS A VICTORY FOR WOMEN IN THE SENSE THAT IT IS NOW SPOUSAL IS THIS A VICTORY FOR WOMEN IN THE SENSE THAT IT IS NOW SPOUSAL ABUSE, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS THE SENSE THAT IT IS NOW SPOUSAL ABUSE, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS BEING TAKEN MORE SERIOUSLY BY ABUSE, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS BEING TAKEN MORE SERIOUSLY BY IMMIGRATION COURTS?

BEING TAKEN MORE SERIOUSLY BY IMMIGRATION COURTS?

>> I THINK SO DEFINITELY.

IMMIGRATION COURTS?

>> I THINK SO DEFINITELY.

IT'S REFLECTIVE OF THE FACT >> I THINK SO DEFINITELY.

IT'S REFLECTIVE OF THE FACT THAT, YES, THESE WOMEN ARE AT IT'S REFLECTIVE OF THE FACT THAT, YES, THESE WOMEN ARE AT RISK OF ASYLUM IS ABOUT THAT, YES, THESE WOMEN ARE AT RISK OF ASYLUM IS ABOUT PROTECTING SOMEONE FROM ALMOST RISK OF ASYLUM IS ABOUT PROTECTING SOMEONE FROM ALMOST IMMINENT DEATH.

PROTECTING SOMEONE FROM ALMOST IMMINENT DEATH.

SO WE HAD A POLITICAL REASONS IMMINENT DEATH.

SO WE HAD A POLITICAL REASONS RAISED, RELIGION, ALL SORTS OF SO WE HAD A POLITICAL REASONS RAISED, RELIGION, ALL SORTS OF OTHERS AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HAS RAISED, RELIGION, ALL SORTS OF OTHERS AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HAS BEEN A STRUGGLE TO HAVE IT OTHERS AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HAS BEEN A STRUGGLE TO HAVE IT RECOGNIZED.

BEEN A STRUGGLE TO HAVE IT RECOGNIZED.

THIS DECISION ALTHOUGH MANY RECOGNIZED.

THIS DECISION ALTHOUGH MANY INTERPRET IT NARROWLY FOCUSED THIS DECISION ALTHOUGH MANY INTERPRET IT NARROWLY FOCUSED IMPACTING GUATEMALAN WOMEN AND INTERPRET IT NARROWLY FOCUSED IMPACTING GUATEMALAN WOMEN AND ALSO IN THE CONTEXT WHICH THE IMPACTING GUATEMALAN WOMEN AND ALSO IN THE CONTEXT WHICH THE GOVERNMENT IS UNWILLING TO ALSO IN THE CONTEXT WHICH THE GOVERNMENT IS UNWILLING TO PROTECT THEM THAT WILL BE ABLE GOVERNMENT IS UNWILLING TO PROTECT THEM THAT WILL BE ABLE TO SEEK ASYLUM IS A VICTORY.

PROTECT THEM THAT WILL BE ABLE TO SEEK ASYLUM IS A VICTORY.

>> I TAKE ISSUE WITH THE NARROW TO SEEK ASYLUM IS A VICTORY.

>> I TAKE ISSUE WITH THE NARROW FOCUS BECAUSE IT IS THAT.

>> I TAKE ISSUE WITH THE NARROW FOCUS BECAUSE IT IS THAT.

IT WILL OPEN THE FLOODGATES FOCUS BECAUSE IT IS THAT.

IT WILL OPEN THE FLOODGATES HERE.

IT WILL OPEN THE FLOODGATES HERE.

I LIKE EVERY OTHER WOMAN WE HERE.

I LIKE EVERY OTHER WOMAN WE NEVER WANT TO TREAT OUR VICTIMS I LIKE EVERY OTHER WOMAN WE NEVER WANT TO TREAT OUR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE POORLY.

NEVER WANT TO TREAT OUR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE POORLY.

AND COMING FROM OTHER COUNTRIES OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE POORLY.

AND COMING FROM OTHER COUNTRIES WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO HELP AND COMING FROM OTHER COUNTRIES WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO HELP THOSE.

WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO HELP THOSE.

THIS IS A SAFE HARBOR FOR THE THOSE.

THIS IS A SAFE HARBOR FOR THE WOMEN BUT WE DON'T WANT TO START THIS IS A SAFE HARBOR FOR THE WOMEN BUT WE DON'T WANT TO START THINGS THAT CAN OPEN THE WOMEN BUT WE DON'T WANT TO START THINGS THAT CAN OPEN THE FLOODGATES IN THE YEARS TO COME.

THINGS THAT CAN OPEN THE FLOODGATES IN THE YEARS TO COME.

>> YOU ARE A LAWYER, NOT AN FLOODGATES IN THE YEARS TO COME.

>> YOU ARE A LAWYER, NOT AN IMMIGRATION LAWYER BUT A LAWYER, >> YOU ARE A LAWYER, NOT AN IMMIGRATION LAWYER BUT A LAWYER, HOW DO YOU PROVE ABUSE IMMIGRATION LAWYER BUT A LAWYER, HOW DO YOU PROVE ABUSE PARTICULARLY IF YOU DON'T HAVE HOW DO YOU PROVE ABUSE PARTICULARLY IF YOU DON'T HAVE PICTURES TAKEN AT THE TIME.

PARTICULARLY IF YOU DON'T HAVE PICTURES TAKEN AT THE TIME.

AND THE POLICE AREN'T GATHERING PICTURES TAKEN AT THE TIME.

AND THE POLICE AREN'T GATHERING EVIDENCE.

AND THE POLICE AREN'T GATHERING EVIDENCE.

>> I TAKE YOU KNOW MY COMMENT EVIDENCE.

>> I TAKE YOU KNOW MY COMMENT AND RESPONSE TO YOUR COMMENT OF >> I TAKE YOU KNOW MY COMMENT AND RESPONSE TO YOUR COMMENT OF FLOODGATES IN IMMIGRATION ASYLUM AND RESPONSE TO YOUR COMMENT OF FLOODGATES IN IMMIGRATION ASYLUM IT'S GOING TO BE HARD TO OPEN FLOODGATES IN IMMIGRATION ASYLUM IT'S GOING TO BE HARD TO OPEN FLOODGATES BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO IT'S GOING TO BE HARD TO OPEN FLOODGATES BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO PRESENT EVIDENCE AND IT'S HARD.

FLOODGATES BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO PRESENT EVIDENCE AND IT'S HARD.

WITNESSES.

PRESENT EVIDENCE AND IT'S HARD.

WITNESSES.

>> WHAT ABOUT THE ASPECT WITNESSES.

>> WHAT ABOUT THE ASPECT REPORTED SAYING THAT JUST THE >> WHAT ABOUT THE ASPECT REPORTED SAYING THAT JUST THE ADMISSION THAT THIS WILL BE REPORTED SAYING THAT JUST THE ADMISSION THAT THIS WILL BE TAKEN AS A FACTOR IS LETTING ADMISSION THAT THIS WILL BE TAKEN AS A FACTOR IS LETTING THOUSANDS MAYBE TENS OF TAKEN AS A FACTOR IS LETTING THOUSANDS MAYBE TENS OF THOUSANDS I DO NOT KNOW BUT THOUSANDS MAYBE TENS OF THOUSANDS I DO NOT KNOW BUT THOUSANDS -- THOUSANDS I DO NOT KNOW BUT THOUSANDS -- IT'S LETTING THEM STAY IN THE THOUSANDS -- IT'S LETTING THEM STAY IN THE COUNTRY UNTIL THIS ISSUE IS IT'S LETTING THEM STAY IN THE COUNTRY UNTIL THIS ISSUE IS RESOLVED.

COUNTRY UNTIL THIS ISSUE IS RESOLVED.

WHICH THE IMMIGRATION LAWYERS RESOLVED.

WHICH THE IMMIGRATION LAWYERS WERE SAYING WAS A VICTORY FOR WHICH THE IMMIGRATION LAWYERS WERE SAYING WAS A VICTORY FOR THESE WOMEN BECAUSE THE LONGER WERE SAYING WAS A VICTORY FOR THESE WOMEN BECAUSE THE LONGER THEY STAY IN THE COUNTRY THE THESE WOMEN BECAUSE THE LONGER THEY STAY IN THE COUNTRY THE MORE LIKELY THEY ARE TO GET THEY STAY IN THE COUNTRY THE MORE LIKELY THEY ARE TO GET CITIZENSHIP.

MORE LIKELY THEY ARE TO GET CITIZENSHIP.

>> TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS HERE.

CITIZENSHIP.

>> TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS HERE.

YES YOU ARE RIGHT.

>> TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS HERE.

YES YOU ARE RIGHT.

IF YOU ARE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY FOR YES YOU ARE RIGHT.

IF YOU ARE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY FOR ASYLUM YOU CAN SAY AND THE IF YOU ARE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY FOR ASYLUM YOU CAN SAY AND THE PEOPLE ABLE TO JUSTIFY THAT THEY ASYLUM YOU CAN SAY AND THE PEOPLE ABLE TO JUSTIFY THAT THEY HAVE A CREDIBLE CASE THEY WILL PEOPLE ABLE TO JUSTIFY THAT THEY HAVE A CREDIBLE CASE THEY WILL BE ABLE TO STAY.

HAVE A CREDIBLE CASE THEY WILL BE ABLE TO STAY.

THEN THERE IS HOW DO YOU PROVE BE ABLE TO STAY.

THEN THERE IS HOW DO YOU PROVE YOUR CASE WHICH BECOMES HARDER THEN THERE IS HOW DO YOU PROVE YOUR CASE WHICH BECOMES HARDER LEVEL OF PROOF.

YOUR CASE WHICH BECOMES HARDER LEVEL OF PROOF.

PARTICULARLY BECAUSE POLITICAL LEVEL OF PROOF.

PARTICULARLY BECAUSE POLITICAL PROSECUTION IS EASIER TO PARTICULARLY BECAUSE POLITICAL PROSECUTION IS EASIER TO DOCUMENT BECAUSE IT IS IN A PROSECUTION IS EASIER TO DOCUMENT BECAUSE IT IS IN A LARGER CONTEXT THAN DOMESTIC DOCUMENT BECAUSE IT IS IN A LARGER CONTEXT THAN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

LARGER CONTEXT THAN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

THAT IS THE NEXT CHALLENGE IF VIOLENCE.

THAT IS THE NEXT CHALLENGE IF THIS BODY OF LAW IS GOING TO GO THAT IS THE NEXT CHALLENGE IF THIS BODY OF LAW IS GOING TO GO ANYWHERE IN TERMS OF PROTECTING THIS BODY OF LAW IS GOING TO GO ANYWHERE IN TERMS OF PROTECTING THESE WOMEN.

ANYWHERE IN TERMS OF PROTECTING THESE WOMEN.

>> AND I CERTAINLY MY HEART GOES THESE WOMEN.

>> AND I CERTAINLY MY HEART GOES OUT TO ANY WOMAN WHO IS A VICTIM >> AND I CERTAINLY MY HEART GOES OUT TO ANY WOMAN WHO IS A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC ABUSE.

OUT TO ANY WOMAN WHO IS A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC ABUSE.

I AM CONCERNED THAT THE DOOR IS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE.

I AM CONCERNED THAT THE DOOR IS GOING TO OPEN FROM ALL COUNTRIES I AM CONCERNED THAT THE DOOR IS GOING TO OPEN FROM ALL COUNTRIES AND NOT THAT WE SHOULD TURN GOING TO OPEN FROM ALL COUNTRIES AND NOT THAT WE SHOULD TURN EVERYONE AWAY OR TAKE EVERYONE AND NOT THAT WE SHOULD TURN EVERYONE AWAY OR TAKE EVERYONE IN.

EVERYONE AWAY OR TAKE EVERYONE IN.

WE NEED TO FIND A COHESIVE PLAN IN.

WE NEED TO FIND A COHESIVE PLAN WHERE WE CAN MAYBE EDUCATE AND WE NEED TO FIND A COHESIVE PLAN WHERE WE CAN MAYBE EDUCATE AND HELP THESE COUNTRIES TO WHERE WE CAN MAYBE EDUCATE AND HELP THESE COUNTRIES TO UNDERSTAND HOW TO TREAT THESE HELP THESE COUNTRIES TO UNDERSTAND HOW TO TREAT THESE ISSUES AND TO DO IT CORRECTLY AS UNDERSTAND HOW TO TREAT THESE ISSUES AND TO DO IT CORRECTLY AS OPPOSED TO SAYING YOU CAN COME ISSUES AND TO DO IT CORRECTLY AS OPPOSED TO SAYING YOU CAN COME AND LIVE HERE AND WE ARE NOT OPPOSED TO SAYING YOU CAN COME AND LIVE HERE AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO WORRY ABOUT WHAT IS AND LIVE HERE AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO WORRY ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON WHERE YOU LIVE.

GOING TO WORRY ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON WHERE YOU LIVE.

>> MY BIGGER CONCERN IS THE GOING ON WHERE YOU LIVE.

>> MY BIGGER CONCERN IS THE OVERALL IMMIGRATION SYSTEM AND >> MY BIGGER CONCERN IS THE OVERALL IMMIGRATION SYSTEM AND HOW IT'S BROKEN.

OVERALL IMMIGRATION SYSTEM AND HOW IT'S BROKEN.

AND IT'S NOT JUST A MATTER OF HOW IT'S BROKEN.

AND IT'S NOT JUST A MATTER OF WOMEN SUFFERING FROM DOMESTIC AND IT'S NOT JUST A MATTER OF WOMEN SUFFERING FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BUT WOMEN ARE WOMEN SUFFERING FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BUT WOMEN ARE ENCOUNTERING PROBLEMS GETTING VIOLENCE BUT WOMEN ARE ENCOUNTERING PROBLEMS GETTING INTO THE COUNTRY EVEN WHEN THEY ENCOUNTERING PROBLEMS GETTING INTO THE COUNTRY EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE A GREAT DEAL TO CONTRIBUTE INTO THE COUNTRY EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE A GREAT DEAL TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE COUNTRY.

HAVE A GREAT DEAL TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE COUNTRY.

AND I'M HAPPY ABOUT THE CASE TO THE COUNTRY.

AND I'M HAPPY ABOUT THE CASE DECIDED THIS WEEK WE SHOULD NOT AND I'M HAPPY ABOUT THE CASE DECIDED THIS WEEK WE SHOULD NOT BE PLANNING OUR IMMIGRATION DECIDED THIS WEEK WE SHOULD NOT BE PLANNING OUR IMMIGRATION POLICY BASE ON ONE COURT CASE BE PLANNING OUR IMMIGRATION POLICY BASE ON ONE COURT CASE HERE, ONE CHANGE THERE.

POLICY BASE ON ONE COURT CASE HERE, ONE CHANGE THERE.

WE NEED TO OPEN THE THING UP AND HERE, ONE CHANGE THERE.

WE NEED TO OPEN THE THING UP AND START OVER AGAIN.

WE NEED TO OPEN THE THING UP AND START OVER AGAIN.

>> START OVER HOW?

START OVER AGAIN.

>> START OVER HOW?

>> COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION.

>> START OVER HOW?

>> COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION.

I KNOW IT IS A DIRTY WORD ON THE >> COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION.

I KNOW IT IS A DIRTY WORD ON THE HILL BUT THEY HAVE TO TAKE THIS I KNOW IT IS A DIRTY WORD ON THE HILL BUT THEY HAVE TO TAKE THIS UP.

HILL BUT THEY HAVE TO TAKE THIS UP.

>> SPELL THAT OUT.

UP.

>> SPELL THAT OUT.

IN THAT PACKAGE WHAT DO YOU >> SPELL THAT OUT.

IN THAT PACKAGE WHAT DO YOU WANT?

IN THAT PACKAGE WHAT DO YOU WANT?

>> EVERYTHING.

WANT?

>> EVERYTHING.

YOU HAVE HIGHLY SKILLED WORKERS >> EVERYTHING.

YOU HAVE HIGHLY SKILLED WORKERS AND FAMILIES WHO WANT TO BE YOU HAVE HIGHLY SKILLED WORKERS AND FAMILIES WHO WANT TO BE REUNITED.

AND FAMILIES WHO WANT TO BE REUNITED.

ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT REUNITED.

ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES ARE RUNNING INTO ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES ARE RUNNING INTO PROBLEMS.

COMMUNITIES ARE RUNNING INTO PROBLEMS.

MANY OF THE SYSTEMS ARE PROBLEMS.

MANY OF THE SYSTEMS ARE OUTDATED.

MANY OF THE SYSTEMS ARE OUTDATED.

WE HAVE SYSTEMS WHERE THERE IS A OUTDATED.

WE HAVE SYSTEMS WHERE THERE IS A PER COUNTRY LIMIT HOW MANY WE HAVE SYSTEMS WHERE THERE IS A PER COUNTRY LIMIT HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED IN EACH YEAR.

PER COUNTRY LIMIT HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED IN EACH YEAR.

THINGS ARE ANTIQUATED AND THEY PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED IN EACH YEAR.

THINGS ARE ANTIQUATED AND THEY DO NOT REFLECT THE POPULATION IN THINGS ARE ANTIQUATED AND THEY DO NOT REFLECT THE POPULATION IN OTHER COUNTRIES THAT IT BECOMES DO NOT REFLECT THE POPULATION IN OTHER COUNTRIES THAT IT BECOMES A REAL PROBLEM FOR PEOPLE TRYING OTHER COUNTRIES THAT IT BECOMES A REAL PROBLEM FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO GET IN.

A REAL PROBLEM FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO GET IN.

START THE SYSTEM OVER.

TO GET IN.

START THE SYSTEM OVER.

>> WHAT PEOPLE HAVE A PROBLEM START THE SYSTEM OVER.

>> WHAT PEOPLE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ON MY SIDE OF THINGS IS THE >> WHAT PEOPLE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ON MY SIDE OF THINGS IS THE PATHWAYS TO CITIZENSHIP.

WITH ON MY SIDE OF THINGS IS THE PATHWAYS TO CITIZENSHIP.

IT'S LIKE YOU'VE GOT LEGAL PATHWAYS TO CITIZENSHIP.

IT'S LIKE YOU'VE GOT LEGAL SKILLED WORKERS WHO CAN IT'S LIKE YOU'VE GOT LEGAL SKILLED WORKERS WHO CAN CONTRIBUTE TO OUR ECONOMY AND SKILLED WORKERS WHO CAN CONTRIBUTE TO OUR ECONOMY AND THEN YOU HAVE ILLEGAL FOLKS WHO CONTRIBUTE TO OUR ECONOMY AND THEN YOU HAVE ILLEGAL FOLKS WHO WHERE DO WE STOP IN GIVING THESE THEN YOU HAVE ILLEGAL FOLKS WHO WHERE DO WE STOP IN GIVING THESE PEOPLE THE SAME PATHWAY TO WHERE DO WE STOP IN GIVING THESE PEOPLE THE SAME PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP?

PEOPLE THE SAME PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP?

ARE THEY ALL DESERVING?

CITIZENSHIP?

ARE THEY ALL DESERVING?

SO THAT IS WHAT IS AT THE CRUX ARE THEY ALL DESERVING?

SO THAT IS WHAT IS AT THE CRUX OF THE MATTER HERE.

SO THAT IS WHAT IS AT THE CRUX OF THE MATTER HERE.

>> BUT I WOULD NOT LEAVE OUT THE OF THE MATTER HERE.

>> BUT I WOULD NOT LEAVE OUT THE FACT THAT THE ILLEGAL WORKERS >> BUT I WOULD NOT LEAVE OUT THE FACT THAT THE ILLEGAL WORKERS ARE CONTRIBUTING A GREAT DEAL TO FACT THAT THE ILLEGAL WORKERS ARE CONTRIBUTING A GREAT DEAL TO OUR ECONOMY.

ARE CONTRIBUTING A GREAT DEAL TO OUR ECONOMY.

>> THEY DO.

OUR ECONOMY.

>> THEY DO.

>> A KEEP A LOT OF WAGES >> THEY DO.

>> A KEEP A LOT OF WAGES SURPRESSED.

>> A KEEP A LOT OF WAGES SURPRESSED.

>> AND IT IS A CHALLENGE BECAUSE SURPRESSED.

>> AND IT IS A CHALLENGE BECAUSE IT IS A COMPLEX ISSUE.

>> AND IT IS A CHALLENGE BECAUSE IT IS A COMPLEX ISSUE.

AND I THINK YOU CAN UNDERSTAND IT IS A COMPLEX ISSUE.

AND I THINK YOU CAN UNDERSTAND BOTH SIDES.

AND I THINK YOU CAN UNDERSTAND BOTH SIDES.

EVEN SOMEONE WHO IS SUPPORTIVE BOTH SIDES.

EVEN SOMEONE WHO IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE BILL THAT WAS PASSED IN EVEN SOMEONE WHO IS SUPPORTIVE OF THE BILL THAT WAS PASSED IN THE SENATE.

OF THE BILL THAT WAS PASSED IN THE SENATE.

BUT WE DON'T HAVE A LOGICAL THE SENATE.

BUT WE DON'T HAVE A LOGICAL DEBATE WE ARE HAVING A BUT WE DON'T HAVE A LOGICAL DEBATE WE ARE HAVING A DYSFUNCTIONAL DEBATE.

DEBATE WE ARE HAVING A DYSFUNCTIONAL DEBATE.

IT'S ILLUSTRATING THE DYSFUNCTIONAL DEBATE.

IT'S ILLUSTRATING THE DYSFUNCTIONALITY OF CONGRESS.

IT'S ILLUSTRATING THE DYSFUNCTIONALITY OF CONGRESS.

THAT IS THE PROBLEM.

DYSFUNCTIONALITY OF CONGRESS.

THAT IS THE PROBLEM.

NOT THAT WE ARE UNABLE TO HAVE THAT IS THE PROBLEM.

NOT THAT WE ARE UNABLE TO HAVE IMMIGRATION REFORM SO WE HAVE NOT THAT WE ARE UNABLE TO HAVE IMMIGRATION REFORM SO WE HAVE THE DECISIONS COMING OUT OF THE IMMIGRATION REFORM SO WE HAVE THE DECISIONS COMING OUT OF THE BIA AND OBAMA TRYING TO HAVE THE DECISIONS COMING OUT OF THE BIA AND OBAMA TRYING TO HAVE EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND WE DON'T BIA AND OBAMA TRYING TO HAVE EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND WE DON'T HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH.

EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND WE DON'T HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH.

>> MY CONCERN IS THE MORE HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH.

>> MY CONCERN IS THE MORE EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE, THE >> MY CONCERN IS THE MORE EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE, THE RULES GO OUT THE WINDOW.

EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE, THE RULES GO OUT THE WINDOW.

AND THERE HAS TO BE A POINT RULES GO OUT THE WINDOW.

AND THERE HAS TO BE A POINT WHERE WE HAVE TO HONE IN ON THIS AND THERE HAS TO BE A POINT WHERE WE HAVE TO HONE IN ON THIS AND MANAGE IT BETTER AND I DON'T WHERE WE HAVE TO HONE IN ON THIS AND MANAGE IT BETTER AND I DON'T KNOW REDOING THE SYSTEM, I DON'T AND MANAGE IT BETTER AND I DON'T KNOW REDOING THE SYSTEM, I DON'T AGREE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE KNOW REDOING THE SYSTEM, I DON'T AGREE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION BUT WE NEED TO HAVE AGREE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION BUT WE NEED TO HAVE SET RULES AND WE HAD THEM AT ONE IMMIGRATION BUT WE NEED TO HAVE SET RULES AND WE HAD THEM AT ONE POINT.

SET RULES AND WE HAD THEM AT ONE POINT.

YOU TO COME INTO THE COUNTRY A POINT.

YOU TO COME INTO THE COUNTRY A SPECIFIC WAY AND WAIT IN LINE.

YOU TO COME INTO THE COUNTRY A SPECIFIC WAY AND WAIT IN LINE.

AND NOW WE ARE JUST MAKING THESE SPECIFIC WAY AND WAIT IN LINE.

AND NOW WE ARE JUST MAKING THESE EXCEPTIONS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE AND NOW WE ARE JUST MAKING THESE EXCEPTIONS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE RUNNING THROUGH THE BORDERS.

EXCEPTIONS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE RUNNING THROUGH THE BORDERS.

>> AND LET'S SWITCH OVER TO THE RUNNING THROUGH THE BORDERS.

>> AND LET'S SWITCH OVER TO THE NFL THE LITTLE TIME WE HAVE >> AND LET'S SWITCH OVER TO THE NFL THE LITTLE TIME WE HAVE LEFT.

NFL THE LITTLE TIME WE HAVE LEFT.

I HEARD REACTIONS THIS IS GREAT LEFT.

I HEARD REACTIONS THIS IS GREAT TO WAIT, THERE SHOULD BE A I HEARD REACTIONS THIS IS GREAT TO WAIT, THERE SHOULD BE A LIFETIME BAN ON THE FIRST TO WAIT, THERE SHOULD BE A LIFETIME BAN ON THE FIRST OFFENSE.

LIFETIME BAN ON THE FIRST OFFENSE.

WHY WAIT UNTIL THE SECOND?

OFFENSE.

WHY WAIT UNTIL THE SECOND?

>> I THINK IT'S GREAT THAT THE WHY WAIT UNTIL THE SECOND?

>> I THINK IT'S GREAT THAT THE NFL THE COMMISSIONER HAS SPOKEN >> I THINK IT'S GREAT THAT THE NFL THE COMMISSIONER HAS SPOKEN OUT.

NFL THE COMMISSIONER HAS SPOKEN OUT.

IT'S UNFORTUNATE BECAUSE OUT.

IT'S UNFORTUNATE BECAUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS NOT JUST IT'S UNFORTUNATE BECAUSE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS NOT JUST PREVALENT IN THE NFL, BASEBALL, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS NOT JUST PREVALENT IN THE NFL, BASEBALL, BASKETBALL A NUMBER OF PLAYERS PREVALENT IN THE NFL, BASEBALL, BASKETBALL A NUMBER OF PLAYERS WHO HAVE BEEN IN TROUBLE FOR IT.

BASKETBALL A NUMBER OF PLAYERS WHO HAVE BEEN IN TROUBLE FOR IT.

AND SO I THINK THAT IT'S GREAT WHO HAVE BEEN IN TROUBLE FOR IT.

AND SO I THINK THAT IT'S GREAT THAT THE ISSUE IS BEING MORE AND SO I THINK THAT IT'S GREAT THAT THE ISSUE IS BEING MORE DISCUSSED.

THAT THE ISSUE IS BEING MORE DISCUSSED.

IT IS SAD TO ME BECAUSE I SAW DISCUSSED.

IT IS SAD TO ME BECAUSE I SAW LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS AND A IT IS SAD TO ME BECAUSE I SAW LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS AND A LOT OF THE MEN WHO WERE ASKED LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS AND A LOT OF THE MEN WHO WERE ASKED WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS AND LOT OF THE MEN WHO WERE ASKED WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS AND THEY GO WELL, YOU KNOW HE IS A WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS AND THEY GO WELL, YOU KNOW HE IS A GOOD PLAYER MAYBE IT WAS ONE THEY GO WELL, YOU KNOW HE IS A GOOD PLAYER MAYBE IT WAS ONE MISTAKE HE WON'T DO IT AGAIN.

GOOD PLAYER MAYBE IT WAS ONE MISTAKE HE WON'T DO IT AGAIN.

HE IS A HUMAN BEING AND IT'S MISTAKE HE WON'T DO IT AGAIN.

HE IS A HUMAN BEING AND IT'S POSSIBLE HE COULD DO IT AGAIN HE IS A HUMAN BEING AND IT'S POSSIBLE HE COULD DO IT AGAIN AND IT FRUSTRATES ME WHEN RAY POSSIBLE HE COULD DO IT AGAIN AND IT FRUSTRATES ME WHEN RAY RICE HAD THE INCIDENT OF AND IT FRUSTRATES ME WHEN RAY RICE HAD THE INCIDENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HE WAS WITH A RICE HAD THE INCIDENT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HE WAS WITH A FEIAN SAY AND SHE BECAME HIS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HE WAS WITH A FEIAN SAY AND SHE BECAME HIS WIFE AND AS A LAWYER CAN YOU NOT FEIAN SAY AND SHE BECAME HIS WIFE AND AS A LAWYER CAN YOU NOT TESTIFY AGAINST YOUR SPOUSE.

WIFE AND AS A LAWYER CAN YOU NOT TESTIFY AGAINST YOUR SPOUSE.

SO HE WAS ABLE TO CIRCUMVENT ANY TESTIFY AGAINST YOUR SPOUSE.

SO HE WAS ABLE TO CIRCUMVENT ANY SERIOUS CHARGES FOR HIS SO HE WAS ABLE TO CIRCUMVENT ANY SERIOUS CHARGES FOR HIS BEHAVIOR.

SERIOUS CHARGES FOR HIS BEHAVIOR.

>> I -- BEHAVIOR.

>> I -- GIVE HIM CREDIT FOR REACTING AND >> I -- GIVE HIM CREDIT FOR REACTING AND GIVE CREDIT TO THE WOMEN THAT GIVE HIM CREDIT FOR REACTING AND GIVE CREDIT TO THE WOMEN THAT MOBILIZED AND PUT PRESSURE ON GIVE CREDIT TO THE WOMEN THAT MOBILIZED AND PUT PRESSURE ON THE NFL TO TAKE A POSITION.

MOBILIZED AND PUT PRESSURE ON THE NFL TO TAKE A POSITION.

THEY HAVE A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH THE NFL TO TAKE A POSITION.

THEY HAVE A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH INJURIES AND A LOT OF OTHER THEY HAVE A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH INJURIES AND A LOT OF OTHER ISSUES RELATED TO YOU KNOW, THE INJURIES AND A LOT OF OTHER ISSUES RELATED TO YOU KNOW, THE ROLE IN SOCIETY AT LARGE.

ISSUES RELATED TO YOU KNOW, THE ROLE IN SOCIETY AT LARGE.

SO THEY TOOK, I THINK A STRONG ROLE IN SOCIETY AT LARGE.

SO THEY TOOK, I THINK A STRONG POSITION.

SO THEY TOOK, I THINK A STRONG POSITION.

WE CAN ARGUE FIRST WHAT TWO OR POSITION.

WE CAN ARGUE FIRST WHAT TWO OR THREE CHANCES BUT THE DOCUMENT WE CAN ARGUE FIRST WHAT TWO OR THREE CHANCES BUT THE DOCUMENT IS STRONG AND IT BUILDS AROUND THREE CHANCES BUT THE DOCUMENT IS STRONG AND IT BUILDS AROUND COLLABORATION WITH WOMEN'S IS STRONG AND IT BUILDS AROUND COLLABORATION WITH WOMEN'S GROUPS AND IT BUILDS A TRAINING COLLABORATION WITH WOMEN'S GROUPS AND IT BUILDS A TRAINING AND AWARENESS PROGRAM FOR THE GROUPS AND IT BUILDS A TRAINING AND AWARENESS PROGRAM FOR THE FOOTBALL LEAGUE.

AND AWARENESS PROGRAM FOR THE FOOTBALL LEAGUE.

I THINK IT IS A GOOD STEP.

FOOTBALL LEAGUE.

I THINK IT IS A GOOD STEP.

>> I HAVE ONE CONCERN ABOUT I THINK IT IS A GOOD STEP.

>> I HAVE ONE CONCERN ABOUT THIS.

>> I HAVE ONE CONCERN ABOUT THIS.

BECAUSE I WORRY ABOUT THOSE THIS.

BECAUSE I WORRY ABOUT THOSE WOMEN WHO ARE MARRIED TO THE BECAUSE I WORRY ABOUT THOSE WOMEN WHO ARE MARRIED TO THE ATHLETES.

WOMEN WHO ARE MARRIED TO THE ATHLETES.

WILL THEY COME OUT AND SAY HE ATHLETES.

WILL THEY COME OUT AND SAY HE DID THIS TO ME AT THE RISK OF WILL THEY COME OUT AND SAY HE DID THIS TO ME AT THE RISK OF HIM LOSING HIS CAREER?

DID THIS TO ME AT THE RISK OF HIM LOSING HIS CAREER?

AND SO THERE IS AN ISSUE THERE HIM LOSING HIS CAREER?

AND SO THERE IS AN ISSUE THERE THAT WE MAY HAVE TO READDRESS.

AND SO THERE IS AN ISSUE THERE THAT WE MAY HAVE TO READDRESS.

>> THE PEOPLE ARE PAID TO BE THAT WE MAY HAVE TO READDRESS.

>> THE PEOPLE ARE PAID TO BE AGGRESSIVE.

>> THE PEOPLE ARE PAID TO BE AGGRESSIVE.

IT WAS ABOUT TIME.

AGGRESSIVE.

IT WAS ABOUT TIME.

THERE'S SHOULD BE NO HOLDS IT WAS ABOUT TIME.

THERE'S SHOULD BE NO HOLDS BARRED.

THERE'S SHOULD BE NO HOLDS BARRED.

IT COULD HAVE BEEN MORE BARRED.

IT COULD HAVE BEEN MORE AGGRESSIVE.

IT COULD HAVE BEEN MORE AGGRESSIVE.

I THINK WHAT THE COMMISSIONER AGGRESSIVE.

I THINK WHAT THE COMMISSIONER SAID AND DONE WILL HAVE A I THINK WHAT THE COMMISSIONER SAID AND DONE WILL HAVE A TRICKLE DOWN EFFECT.

SAID AND DONE WILL HAVE A TRICKLE DOWN EFFECT.

>> I AM SURPRISED HE PIVOTED SO TRICKLE DOWN EFFECT.

>> I AM SURPRISED HE PIVOTED SO QUICK.

>> I AM SURPRISED HE PIVOTED SO QUICK.

>> I HEARD AND READ SOMEWHERE QUICK.

>> I HEARD AND READ SOMEWHERE ON-LINE IT WAS BECAUSE THERE WAS >> I HEARD AND READ SOMEWHERE ON-LINE IT WAS BECAUSE THERE WAS A CHANGE OR PETITION SIGNED BY ON-LINE IT WAS BECAUSE THERE WAS A CHANGE OR PETITION SIGNED BY 140,000 PEOPLE TO GET SOMETHING A CHANGE OR PETITION SIGNED BY 140,000 PEOPLE TO GET SOMETHING DONE.

140,000 PEOPLE TO GET SOMETHING DONE.

>> BUT YOU DON'T ALWAYS SEE THEM DONE.

>> BUT YOU DON'T ALWAYS SEE THEM REACTING SO QUICKLY AND I'M >> BUT YOU DON'T ALWAYS SEE THEM REACTING SO QUICKLY AND I'M PLEASED HE HAS DONE THIS.

REACTING SO QUICKLY AND I'M PLEASED HE HAS DONE THIS.

>> BEHIND THE HEADLINES.

PLEASED HE HAS DONE THIS.

>> BEHIND THE HEADLINES.

IN THE MIDST OF MUMBAI'S RED >> BEHIND THE HEADLINES.

IN THE MIDST OF MUMBAI'S RED LIGHT DISTRICT THERE IS ONE IN THE MIDST OF MUMBAI'S RED LIGHT DISTRICT THERE IS ONE BRIGHT LIGHT.

LIGHT DISTRICT THERE IS ONE BRIGHT LIGHT.

NIGHT SHELTERS FOR CHILDREN.

BRIGHT LIGHT.

NIGHT SHELTERS FOR CHILDREN.

SHELTERS OFFER PROTECTION AND NIGHT SHELTERS FOR CHILDREN.

SHELTERS OFFER PROTECTION AND SECURITY AS WELL AS HOPE FOR A SHELTERS OFFER PROTECTION AND SECURITY AS WELL AS HOPE FOR A BETTER LIFE.

SECURITY AS WELL AS HOPE FOR A BETTER LIFE.

>> WHAT HIT ME VERY HARD WAS THE BETTER LIFE.

>> WHAT HIT ME VERY HARD WAS THE LITTLE INFANTS WHO COULD NOT >> WHAT HIT ME VERY HARD WAS THE LITTLE INFANTS WHO COULD NOT FEND FOR THEMSELVES BEING LITTLE INFANTS WHO COULD NOT FEND FOR THEMSELVES BEING DRUGGED AND PUT OFF TO SLEEP FEND FOR THEMSELVES BEING DRUGGED AND PUT OFF TO SLEEP BELOW THE BEDS THEIR MOTHERS DRUGGED AND PUT OFF TO SLEEP BELOW THE BEDS THEIR MOTHERS THERE, THE MOTHERS WERE FORCED BELOW THE BEDS THEIR MOTHERS THERE, THE MOTHERS WERE FORCED TO SERVICE CUSTOMERS.

THERE, THE MOTHERS WERE FORCED TO SERVICE CUSTOMERS.

IT WAS THAT SIGHT AND IT WAS ALL TO SERVICE CUSTOMERS.

IT WAS THAT SIGHT AND IT WAS ALL THAT WAS HAPPENING TO THE IT WAS THAT SIGHT AND IT WAS ALL THAT WAS HAPPENING TO THE CHILDREN IN THE EVENINGS THAT THAT WAS HAPPENING TO THE CHILDREN IN THE EVENINGS THAT ACTUALLY GOT US TO THINK ABOUT CHILDREN IN THE EVENINGS THAT ACTUALLY GOT US TO THINK ABOUT HOW CAN WE PROTECT THESE ACTUALLY GOT US TO THINK ABOUT HOW CAN WE PROTECT THESE CHILDREN.

HOW CAN WE PROTECT THESE CHILDREN.

>> SEEING THAT PROBLEM, SOCIAL CHILDREN.

>> SEEING THAT PROBLEM, SOCIAL WORKER PRIT PRIT PRIT PATKAR >> SEEING THAT PROBLEM, SOCIAL WORKER PRIT PRIT PRIT PATKAR SETUP SHELTERS FOR INDIAN WORKER PRIT PRIT PRIT PATKAR SETUP SHELTERS FOR INDIAN PROSTITUTES.

SETUP SHELTERS FOR INDIAN PROSTITUTES.

SHE RECEIVES AWARDS FOR HER WORK PROSTITUTES.

SHE RECEIVES AWARDS FOR HER WORK NOW BUT IT WASN'T ALWAYS THE SHE RECEIVES AWARDS FOR HER WORK NOW BUT IT WASN'T ALWAYS THE CASE.

NOW BUT IT WASN'T ALWAYS THE CASE.

>> PEOPLE THOUGHT I WAS MAD.

CASE.

>> PEOPLE THOUGHT I WAS MAD.

PEOPLE THOUGHT THAT WE WERE >> PEOPLE THOUGHT I WAS MAD.

PEOPLE THOUGHT THAT WE WERE ENCOURAGING PROSTITUTES TO BE PEOPLE THOUGHT THAT WE WERE ENCOURAGING PROSTITUTES TO BE EVEN MORE FRIVOLOUS BY TAKING ENCOURAGING PROSTITUTES TO BE EVEN MORE FRIVOLOUS BY TAKING CARE OF THEIR CHILDREN.

EVEN MORE FRIVOLOUS BY TAKING CARE OF THEIR CHILDREN.

PEOPLE FELT I WAS INTO SOMETHING CARE OF THEIR CHILDREN.

PEOPLE FELT I WAS INTO SOMETHING SENSATIONAL.

PEOPLE FELT I WAS INTO SOMETHING SENSATIONAL.

PEOPLE ALSO CRITICIZED ME BY SENSATIONAL.

PEOPLE ALSO CRITICIZED ME BY SAYING WHY SHOULD DEVELOPMENTAL PEOPLE ALSO CRITICIZED ME BY SAYING WHY SHOULD DEVELOPMENTAL FUNDS BE DIVERTED FOR THE SAYING WHY SHOULD DEVELOPMENTAL FUNDS BE DIVERTED FOR THE WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT OF FUNDS BE DIVERTED FOR THE WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTES.

WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTES.

>> DESPITE CHALLENGES, PATKAR CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTES.

>> DESPITE CHALLENGES, PATKAR GAINED SUPPORT AND ACCESS TO AN >> DESPITE CHALLENGES, PATKAR GAINED SUPPORT AND ACCESS TO AN EMPTY PUBLIC SCHOOL CLASSROOM IN GAINED SUPPORT AND ACCESS TO AN EMPTY PUBLIC SCHOOL CLASSROOM IN ONE OF THE LARGEST RED LIGHT EMPTY PUBLIC SCHOOL CLASSROOM IN ONE OF THE LARGEST RED LIGHT DISTRICTS IN MUMBAI.

ONE OF THE LARGEST RED LIGHT DISTRICTS IN MUMBAI.

IN 1986, THE CLASSROOM OPENED AS DISTRICTS IN MUMBAI.

IN 1986, THE CLASSROOM OPENED AS THE FIRST NIGHT CARE CENTER.

IN 1986, THE CLASSROOM OPENED AS THE FIRST NIGHT CARE CENTER.

>> TODAY, WE WORK IN THREE RED THE FIRST NIGHT CARE CENTER.

>> TODAY, WE WORK IN THREE RED LIGHT AREAS.

>> TODAY, WE WORK IN THREE RED LIGHT AREAS.

AND I FEEL VERY PROUD TO SAY LIGHT AREAS.

AND I FEEL VERY PROUD TO SAY THAT YOU WILL NOT FIND A SINGLE AND I FEEL VERY PROUD TO SAY THAT YOU WILL NOT FIND A SINGLE CHILD IN THE RED LIGHT AREAS NOT THAT YOU WILL NOT FIND A SINGLE CHILD IN THE RED LIGHT AREAS NOT GOING TO SCHOOL.

CHILD IN THE RED LIGHT AREAS NOT GOING TO SCHOOL.

>> THE SHELTERS ARE NOT JUST A GOING TO SCHOOL.

>> THE SHELTERS ARE NOT JUST A SANCTUARY FOR CHILDREN THERE ARE >> THE SHELTERS ARE NOT JUST A SANCTUARY FOR CHILDREN THERE ARE SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL SANCTUARY FOR CHILDREN THERE ARE SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMSISM IF YOU ARE TALKING SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMSISM IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS AND PROGRAMSISM IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS AND CHILDREN'S RIGHT TO PROTECTION ABOUT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS AND CHILDREN'S RIGHT TO PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT, THEN EVERY CHILDREN'S RIGHT TO PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT, THEN EVERY CHILD SHOULD HAVE ACCESS TO AND DEVELOPMENT, THEN EVERY CHILD SHOULD HAVE ACCESS TO EDUCATION.

CHILD SHOULD HAVE ACCESS TO EDUCATION.

BECAUSE WITHOUT EDUCATION, WE EDUCATION.

BECAUSE WITHOUT EDUCATION, WE CANNOT BE TALKING ABOUT BECAUSE WITHOUT EDUCATION, WE CANNOT BE TALKING ABOUT DEVELOPMENT AT ALL.

CANNOT BE TALKING ABOUT DEVELOPMENT AT ALL.

EVERY CHILD ENROLLS IN A FORMAL DEVELOPMENT AT ALL.

EVERY CHILD ENROLLS IN A FORMAL SCHOOL.

EVERY CHILD ENROLLS IN A FORMAL SCHOOL.

AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE GRADUATED SCHOOL.

AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE GRADUATED FROM SCHOOLS HAVE GONE TO AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE GRADUATED FROM SCHOOLS HAVE GONE TO COLLEGES.

FROM SCHOOLS HAVE GONE TO COLLEGES.

>> PROSTITUTION IS LEGAL IN COLLEGES.

>> PROSTITUTION IS LEGAL IN INDIA AND THERE ARE ESTIMATED TO >> PROSTITUTION IS LEGAL IN INDIA AND THERE ARE ESTIMATED TO BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN TWO AND INDIA AND THERE ARE ESTIMATED TO BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN TWO AND THREE MILLION SEX WORKERS MANY BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN TWO AND THREE MILLION SEX WORKERS MANY OF THE CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTES THREE MILLION SEX WORKERS MANY OF THE CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTES END UP AS PROSTITUTES OF THE CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTES END UP AS PROSTITUTES THEMSELVES.

END UP AS PROSTITUTES THEMSELVES.

BUT THE SHELTERS AT LEAST TRY TO THEMSELVES.

BUT THE SHELTERS AT LEAST TRY TO PUT AN END TO THE CYCLE.

BUT THE SHELTERS AT LEAST TRY TO PUT AN END TO THE CYCLE.

>> IF YOU INVEST IN THESE PUT AN END TO THE CYCLE.

>> IF YOU INVEST IN THESE CHILDREN AND IF YOU CREATE THE >> IF YOU INVEST IN THESE CHILDREN AND IF YOU CREATE THE ENABLING ENVIRONMENT, YOU CAN CHILDREN AND IF YOU CREATE THE ENABLING ENVIRONMENT, YOU CAN ABOLISH INTERGENERATIONAL ENABLING ENVIRONMENT, YOU CAN ABOLISH INTERGENERATIONAL TRAFFICKING.

ABOLISH INTERGENERATIONAL TRAFFICKING.

>> THE NIGHT SHELTERS PROVIDE TRAFFICKING.

>> THE NIGHT SHELTERS PROVIDE SERVICES FOR YOUNG WOMEN AND MEN >> THE NIGHT SHELTERS PROVIDE SERVICES FOR YOUNG WOMEN AND MEN RESCUED FROM THE SEX TRADE.

SERVICES FOR YOUNG WOMEN AND MEN RESCUED FROM THE SEX TRADE.

>> WE HAVE AN ENTIRE PROGRAM FOR RESCUED FROM THE SEX TRADE.

>> WE HAVE AN ENTIRE PROGRAM FOR THOSE YOUNG GIRLS WHO ARE >> WE HAVE AN ENTIRE PROGRAM FOR THOSE YOUNG GIRLS WHO ARE RESCUED OR YOUNG WOMEN RESCUED THOSE YOUNG GIRLS WHO ARE RESCUED OR YOUNG WOMEN RESCUED FROM THE SEX TRADE.

RESCUED OR YOUNG WOMEN RESCUED FROM THE SEX TRADE.

WE DO HELP THEM WITH SOCIAL FROM THE SEX TRADE.

WE DO HELP THEM WITH SOCIAL COUNSELING, LEGAL INTERVENTION, WE DO HELP THEM WITH SOCIAL COUNSELING, LEGAL INTERVENTION, WE HAVE REINTEGRATION.

COUNSELING, LEGAL INTERVENTION, WE HAVE REINTEGRATION.

>> PATKAR'S SHELTER SERVES AS A WE HAVE REINTEGRATION.

>> PATKAR'S SHELTER SERVES AS A MODEL FOR OTHER ORGANIZATIONS >> PATKAR'S SHELTER SERVES AS A MODEL FOR OTHER ORGANIZATIONS WORKING TO ELIMINATE MODEL FOR OTHER ORGANIZATIONS WORKING TO ELIMINATE INTERGENERATIONAL TRAFFICKING WORKING TO ELIMINATE INTERGENERATIONAL TRAFFICKING AND PROSTITUTION.

INTERGENERATIONAL TRAFFICKING AND PROSTITUTION.

>> WE HAVE THESE CHILDREN COMING AND PROSTITUTION.

>> WE HAVE THESE CHILDREN COMING BACK AND TALKING ABOUT THEIR >> WE HAVE THESE CHILDREN COMING BACK AND TALKING ABOUT THEIR STORIES TO THE MOTHERS, TO THE BACK AND TALKING ABOUT THEIR STORIES TO THE MOTHERS, TO THE WORLD, TO OTHER CHILDREN STORIES TO THE MOTHERS, TO THE WORLD, TO OTHER CHILDREN INSPIRING THEM THROUGH THEIR WORLD, TO OTHER CHILDREN INSPIRING THEM THROUGH THEIR STORIES AND THEIR JOURNEY.

INSPIRING THEM THROUGH THEIR STORIES AND THEIR JOURNEY.

SO YEAH, IS THIS WHAT WE HAVE STORIES AND THEIR JOURNEY.

SO YEAH, IS THIS WHAT WE HAVE MANAGED TO ACCOMPLISH AND I SO YEAH, IS THIS WHAT WE HAVE MANAGED TO ACCOMPLISH AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE PEOPLE MANAGED TO ACCOMPLISH AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE PEOPLE INVESTING MORE ON THESE WOULD LIKE TO SEE PEOPLE INVESTING MORE ON THESE CHILDREN.

INVESTING MORE ON THESE CHILDREN.

PEOPLE INVESTING MORE ON LARGER CHILDREN.

PEOPLE INVESTING MORE ON LARGER ISSUES OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE PEOPLE INVESTING MORE ON LARGER ISSUES OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE AND CHILD PROTECTION.

ISSUES OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE AND CHILD PROTECTION.

>> I JUST CAN'T IMAGINE DRUGGING AND CHILD PROTECTION.

>> I JUST CAN'T IMAGINE DRUGGING A CHILD AND LEAVING IT UNDER THE >> I JUST CAN'T IMAGINE DRUGGING A CHILD AND LEAVING IT UNDER THE BED WHILE THEY ARE HAVING A CHILD AND LEAVING IT UNDER THE BED WHILE THEY ARE HAVING COMMERCIAL SEX.

BED WHILE THEY ARE HAVING COMMERCIAL SEX.

HOW DID WE GET THERE?

COMMERCIAL SEX.

HOW DID WE GET THERE?

AND HOW DO WE GET OUT OF THERE?

HOW DID WE GET THERE?

AND HOW DO WE GET OUT OF THERE?

>> ASTONISHING FIGURES, MARR AND HOW DO WE GET OUT OF THERE?

>> ASTONISHING FIGURES, MARR INDIA AND HOW INDIA GOT THERE IS >> ASTONISHING FIGURES, MARR INDIA AND HOW INDIA GOT THERE IS LITTLE LACK OF, I GUESS, CARING INDIA AND HOW INDIA GOT THERE IS LITTLE LACK OF, I GUESS, CARING ABOUT INDIVIDUAL LIVES THERE.

LITTLE LACK OF, I GUESS, CARING ABOUT INDIVIDUAL LIVES THERE.

IT'S NOT AMERICA.

ABOUT INDIVIDUAL LIVES THERE.

IT'S NOT AMERICA.

AND DESPITE IT BEING THE WORLD'S IT'S NOT AMERICA.

AND DESPITE IT BEING THE WORLD'S LARGEST DEMOCRACY AND IT'S SCARY AND DESPITE IT BEING THE WORLD'S LARGEST DEMOCRACY AND IT'S SCARY OUT OF IN MUMBAI THE NEW YORK OF LARGEST DEMOCRACY AND IT'S SCARY OUT OF IN MUMBAI THE NEW YORK OF INDIA, VERY COSMOPOLITAN IT IS A OUT OF IN MUMBAI THE NEW YORK OF INDIA, VERY COSMOPOLITAN IT IS A $1 BILLION INDUSTRY INDIA, VERY COSMOPOLITAN IT IS A $1 BILLION INDUSTRY PROSTITUTION.

$1 BILLION INDUSTRY PROSTITUTION.

82 CHILDREN EACH DAY ARE FORCED PROSTITUTION.

82 CHILDREN EACH DAY ARE FORCED INTO SEX SLAVERY.

82 CHILDREN EACH DAY ARE FORCED INTO SEX SLAVERY.

>> QUICKLY BEST WAY TO END IT?

INTO SEX SLAVERY.

>> QUICKLY BEST WAY TO END IT?

>> BEST WAY TO END IT IS DOING >> QUICKLY BEST WAY TO END IT?

>> BEST WAY TO END IT IS DOING WHAT THIS ORGANIZATION IS DOING.

>> BEST WAY TO END IT IS DOING WHAT THIS ORGANIZATION IS DOING.

EDUCATION, EDUCATION, EDUCATION, WHAT THIS ORGANIZATION IS DOING.

EDUCATION, EDUCATION, EDUCATION, WITH MORE FUNDS.

EDUCATION, EDUCATION, EDUCATION, WITH MORE FUNDS.

>> THE STORY IS ABOUT THE WORST WITH MORE FUNDS.

>> THE STORY IS ABOUT THE WORST OF INDIA, THE SITUATION OF THE >> THE STORY IS ABOUT THE WORST OF INDIA, THE SITUATION OF THE CHILDREN AND THE PROSTITUTES AND OF INDIA, THE SITUATION OF THE CHILDREN AND THE PROSTITUTES AND ABOUT THE BEST OF INDIA.

CHILDREN AND THE PROSTITUTES AND ABOUT THE BEST OF INDIA.

THAT WOMAN WHAT A HEART.

ABOUT THE BEST OF INDIA.

THAT WOMAN WHAT A HEART.

HOW COURAGEOUS.

THAT WOMAN WHAT A HEART.

HOW COURAGEOUS.

HOW HER ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS HOW COURAGEOUS.

HOW HER ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS GIVING THE KIDS A CHANCE IT IS A HOW HER ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS GIVING THE KIDS A CHANCE IT IS A BEAUTIFUL STORY.

GIVING THE KIDS A CHANCE IT IS A BEAUTIFUL STORY.

>> YOU KNOW AS A CHILD YOU DO BEAUTIFUL STORY.

>> YOU KNOW AS A CHILD YOU DO NOT PICK WHO YOU ARE GOING TO BE >> YOU KNOW AS A CHILD YOU DO NOT PICK WHO YOU ARE GOING TO BE BORN TO AND IT'S UNFORTUNATE THE NOT PICK WHO YOU ARE GOING TO BE BORN TO AND IT'S UNFORTUNATE THE CHILDREN HAVE TO LIVE HIS LIFE BORN TO AND IT'S UNFORTUNATE THE CHILDREN HAVE TO LIVE HIS LIFE AND WHAT A COMPASSIONATE PERSON CHILDREN HAVE TO LIVE HIS LIFE AND WHAT A COMPASSIONATE PERSON TO GIVE THEM THIS OPPORTUNITY.

AND WHAT A COMPASSIONATE PERSON TO GIVE THEM THIS OPPORTUNITY.

>> WHAT ABOUT BIRTH CONTROL TO TO GIVE THEM THIS OPPORTUNITY.

>> WHAT ABOUT BIRTH CONTROL TO SEX WORKERS?

>> WHAT ABOUT BIRTH CONTROL TO SEX WORKERS?

>> AS FAR AS THAT NEEDS TO BE AN SEX WORKERS?

>> AS FAR AS THAT NEEDS TO BE AN ONGOING ISSUE WHEN YOU LOOK AT >> AS FAR AS THAT NEEDS TO BE AN ONGOING ISSUE WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS.

ONGOING ISSUE WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS.

BUT FOR THE CHILDREN WHO ARE THIS.

BUT FOR THE CHILDREN WHO ARE HERE THIS IS THE PERFECT BUT FOR THE CHILDREN WHO ARE HERE THIS IS THE PERFECT SOLUTION IT GIVES THEM AN HERE THIS IS THE PERFECT SOLUTION IT GIVES THEM AN OPPORTUNITY THAT THEIR MOTHERS SOLUTION IT GIVES THEM AN OPPORTUNITY THAT THEIR MOTHERS NEVER HAD.

OPPORTUNITY THAT THEIR MOTHERS NEVER HAD.

>> ALL RIGHT.

NEVER HAD.

>> ALL RIGHT.

THAT IS IT FOR THIS EDITION.

>> ALL RIGHT.

THAT IS IT FOR THIS EDITION.

VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

THAT IS IT FOR THIS EDITION.

VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK TO VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK TO THE CONTRARY SEE YOU NEXT WEEK.

FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR SEE AN FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR SEE AN ON-LINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR SEE AN ON-LINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE OF TO THE CONTRARY VISIT BOSTON