>> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE >> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY" >> THIS WEEK ON "TO THE CONTRARY" FIRST, A SURPRISING AGE SPLIT CONTRARY" FIRST, A SURPRISING AGE SPLIT OVER OBAMACARE.

FIRST, A SURPRISING AGE SPLIT OVER OBAMACARE.

THEN, MIXED-RACE COUPLES MAY BE OVER OBAMACARE.

THEN, MIXED-RACE COUPLES MAY BE MARRIAGE AVERSE.

THEN, MIXED-RACE COUPLES MAY BE MARRIAGE AVERSE.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: HILLARY OR MARRIAGE AVERSE.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: HILLARY OR NO HILLARY THIS WOMAN WANTS TO BEHIND THE HEADLINES: HILLARY OR NO HILLARY THIS WOMAN WANTS TO SEE A WOMAN ELECTED PRESIDENT IN NO HILLARY THIS WOMAN WANTS TO SEE A WOMAN ELECTED PRESIDENT IN 2016.

HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL WELCOME TO "TO THE CONTRARY," A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST, HEALTH CARE REFORM.

PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST, HEALTH CARE REFORM.

IN A FEW WEEKS AMERICANS CAN UP FIRST, HEALTH CARE REFORM.

IN A FEW WEEKS AMERICANS CAN START SIGNING UP FOR OBAMACARE IN A FEW WEEKS AMERICANS CAN START SIGNING UP FOR OBAMACARE HEALTH INSURANCE.

START SIGNING UP FOR OBAMACARE HEALTH INSURANCE.

BUT THAT WON'T END THE DEBATE.

HEALTH INSURANCE.

BUT THAT WON'T END THE DEBATE.

THERE'S STILL A ROBUST CAMPAIGN BUT THAT WON'T END THE DEBATE.

THERE'S STILL A ROBUST CAMPAIGN LED MAINLY BY REPUBLICANS TO THERE'S STILL A ROBUST CAMPAIGN LED MAINLY BY REPUBLICANS TO DEFUND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

LED MAINLY BY REPUBLICANS TO DEFUND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

THE ADMINISTRATION ALONG WITH DEFUND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

THE ADMINISTRATION ALONG WITH CORPORATE PARTNERS IS SPENDING THE ADMINISTRATION ALONG WITH CORPORATE PARTNERS IS SPENDING ALMOST THREE-QUARTERS OF A CORPORATE PARTNERS IS SPENDING ALMOST THREE-QUARTERS OF A BILLION DOLLARS TO EDUCATE THE ALMOST THREE-QUARTERS OF A BILLION DOLLARS TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC, ESPECIALLY YOUNG HEALTHY BILLION DOLLARS TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC, ESPECIALLY YOUNG HEALTHY ADULTS, ABOUT OBAMACARE.

PUBLIC, ESPECIALLY YOUNG HEALTHY ADULTS, ABOUT OBAMACARE.

THIS WEEK A NEW SURVEY FINDS ADULTS, ABOUT OBAMACARE.

THIS WEEK A NEW SURVEY FINDS THAT OUTREACH MAY BE WORKING.

THIS WEEK A NEW SURVEY FINDS THAT OUTREACH MAY BE WORKING.

THE MORNING CONSULT TRACKING THAT OUTREACH MAY BE WORKING.

THE MORNING CONSULT TRACKING POLL SHOWS 56% OF ADULTS 18 TO THE MORNING CONSULT TRACKING POLL SHOWS 56% OF ADULTS 18 TO 29 YEARS OLD SUPPORT THE LAW, POLL SHOWS 56% OF ADULTS 18 TO 29 YEARS OLD SUPPORT THE LAW, AND 35% ARE ALMOST CERTAIN OR 29 YEARS OLD SUPPORT THE LAW, AND 35% ARE ALMOST CERTAIN OR VERY LIKELY TO ENROLL.

AND 35% ARE ALMOST CERTAIN OR VERY LIKELY TO ENROLL.

ON THE OTHER SIDE, 58% OF VERY LIKELY TO ENROLL.

ON THE OTHER SIDE, 58% OF AMERICANS OVER 65 DISAPPROVE OF ON THE OTHER SIDE, 58% OF AMERICANS OVER 65 DISAPPROVE OF THE LAW.

AMERICANS OVER 65 DISAPPROVE OF THE LAW.

ONLY 8% ARE LIKELY TO CONSIDER THE LAW.

ONLY 8% ARE LIKELY TO CONSIDER PURCHASING FROM THE EXCHANGES.

ONLY 8% ARE LIKELY TO CONSIDER PURCHASING FROM THE EXCHANGES.

CONGRESSWOMAN NORTON WILL YOUNG, PURCHASING FROM THE EXCHANGES.

CONGRESSWOMAN NORTON WILL YOUNG, HEALTHY AMERICANS SAVE OBAMA CONGRESSWOMAN NORTON WILL YOUNG, HEALTHY AMERICANS SAVE OBAMA CARE?

HEALTHY AMERICANS SAVE OBAMA CARE?

>> REFRESHING, BONNIE.

CARE?

>> REFRESHING, BONNIE.

ENTIRE COHORT THAT IGNORES THE >> REFRESHING, BONNIE.

ENTIRE COHORT THAT IGNORES THE 40th REPUBLICAN REPEAL OF ENTIRE COHORT THAT IGNORES THE 40th REPUBLICAN REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE AND DECIDES THAT 40th REPUBLICAN REPEAL OF HEALTH CARE AND DECIDES THAT OBAMA CARE IS GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH CARE AND DECIDES THAT OBAMA CARE IS GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH.

OBAMA CARE IS GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH.

>> WHAT THE RESEARCH SHOWS IS HEALTH.

>> WHAT THE RESEARCH SHOWS IS THAT EVERY AGE GROUP THAT LEARNS >> WHAT THE RESEARCH SHOWS IS THAT EVERY AGE GROUP THAT LEARNS THAT 'BECOME MA CARE MAY BE THAT EVERY AGE GROUP THAT LEARNS THAT 'BECOME MA CARE MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH CARE THAT 'BECOME MA CARE MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH CARE COVERAGE INCREASINGLY IS NOT FOR HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH CARE COVERAGE INCREASINGLY IS NOT FOR 'BECOME MACARE.

COVERAGE INCREASINGLY IS NOT FOR 'BECOME MACARE.

I THINK DEBATE CONTINUES EVEN 'BECOME MACARE.

I THINK DEBATE CONTINUES EVEN AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE.

I THINK DEBATE CONTINUES EVEN AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE.

>> I THINK YOUNG PEOPLE WILL AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE.

>> I THINK YOUNG PEOPLE WILL SAVE, THIS IS WHAT IS SO MUCH >> I THINK YOUNG PEOPLE WILL SAVE, THIS IS WHAT IS SO MUCH FUN ABOUT FOOTBALL AND POLITICS SAVE, THIS IS WHAT IS SO MUCH FUN ABOUT FOOTBALL AND POLITICS THE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM IS SO FUN ABOUT FOOTBALL AND POLITICS THE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM IS SO OFTEN WRONG.

THE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM IS SO OFTEN WRONG.

ONLY A QUARTER OF YOUNG PEOPLE OFTEN WRONG.

ONLY A QUARTER OF YOUNG PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT OBAMA CARE UNDERSTAND ONLY A QUARTER OF YOUNG PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT OBAMA CARE UNDERSTAND THAT THESE EXCHANGES ARE DOING KNOW ABOUT OBAMA CARE UNDERSTAND THAT THESE EXCHANGES ARE DOING ACCORDING TO THE COMMONWEALTH THAT THESE EXCHANGES ARE DOING ACCORDING TO THE COMMONWEALTH FUND.

ACCORDING TO THE COMMONWEALTH FUND.

I DON'T THINK THAT MY GENERATION FUND.

I DON'T THINK THAT MY GENERATION CAN BE RELIED TO SAVE THIS I DON'T THINK THAT MY GENERATION CAN BE RELIED TO SAVE THIS LEGISLATION.

CAN BE RELIED TO SAVE THIS LEGISLATION.

>> BUT WHY THE AGE SPLIT?

LEGISLATION.

>> BUT WHY THE AGE SPLIT?

ONE WOULD THINK NORMALLY THAT >> BUT WHY THE AGE SPLIT?

ONE WOULD THINK NORMALLY THAT OLDER AMERICANS WHO HAVE GROWN ONE WOULD THINK NORMALLY THAT OLDER AMERICANS WHO HAVE GROWN UP LOOKING FORWARD TO SOCIAL OLDER AMERICANS WHO HAVE GROWN UP LOOKING FORWARD TO SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE WOULD BE UP LOOKING FORWARD TO SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE WOULD BE MORE FOR IT AND YOUNGER SECURITY AND MEDICARE WOULD BE MORE FOR IT AND YOUNGER WOULDN'T.

MORE FOR IT AND YOUNGER WOULDN'T.

>> HOW SHAMEFUL.

WOULDN'T.

>> HOW SHAMEFUL.

THE ONLY GROUP OF AMERICANS WHO >> HOW SHAMEFUL.

THE ONLY GROUP OF AMERICANS WHO HAVE HAD THE BENEFIT OF 100% THE ONLY GROUP OF AMERICANS WHO HAVE HAD THE BENEFIT OF 100% COVERAGE OF HEALTH CARE SAY TO HAVE HAD THE BENEFIT OF 100% COVERAGE OF HEALTH CARE SAY TO THEIR GRANDCHILDREN AND CHILDREN COVERAGE OF HEALTH CARE SAY TO THEIR GRANDCHILDREN AND CHILDREN NO SUCH HEALTH CARE FOR YOU.

THEIR GRANDCHILDREN AND CHILDREN NO SUCH HEALTH CARE FOR YOU.

SHAME ON THOSE OVER 65 WHO WANT NO SUCH HEALTH CARE FOR YOU.

SHAME ON THOSE OVER 65 WHO WANT TO DEFY COVERAGE THAT'S NOT AS SHAME ON THOSE OVER 65 WHO WANT TO DEFY COVERAGE THAT'S NOT AS GOOD TO THE REST OF AMERICANS.

TO DEFY COVERAGE THAT'S NOT AS GOOD TO THE REST OF AMERICANS.

>> LET ME DEFEND GRANDPARENTS GOOD TO THE REST OF AMERICANS.

>> LET ME DEFEND GRANDPARENTS FOR A SECOND HERE.

>> LET ME DEFEND GRANDPARENTS FOR A SECOND HERE.

[ LAUGHTER ] FOR A SECOND HERE.

[ LAUGHTER ] THESE ARE FOLKS WHO HAVE ALSO [ LAUGHTER ] THESE ARE FOLKS WHO HAVE ALSO HAD EXPERIENCE WITH MEDICARE, THESE ARE FOLKS WHO HAVE ALSO HAD EXPERIENCE WITH MEDICARE, MANY MEDICAID.

HAD EXPERIENCE WITH MEDICARE, MANY MEDICAID.

AND THEY OF HAVING MORE AND MORE MANY MEDICAID.

AND THEY OF HAVING MORE AND MORE OF THEIR DOCTORS SAY, I DON'T AND THEY OF HAVING MORE AND MORE OF THEIR DOCTORS SAY, I DON'T THAT I THAT ANY MORE BECAUSE THE OF THEIR DOCTORS SAY, I DON'T THAT I THAT ANY MORE BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT AND RED TAPE THAT IS THAT I THAT ANY MORE BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT AND RED TAPE THAT IS INVOLVED IS TOO MUCH FOR ME TO GOVERNMENT AND RED TAPE THAT IS INVOLVED IS TOO MUCH FOR ME TO HANDLE.

INVOLVED IS TOO MUCH FOR ME TO HANDLE.

I THEY THEY KNOW THAT'S WHAT'S HANDLE.

I THEY THEY KNOW THAT'S WHAT'S COMING FOR EVERYBODY WITH OWE I THEY THEY KNOW THAT'S WHAT'S COMING FOR EVERYBODY WITH OWE MOM BEEN -- OBAMA CARE.

COMING FOR EVERYBODY WITH OWE MOM BEEN -- OBAMA CARE.

THEY USUALLY DON'T HAVE HEALTH MOM BEEN -- OBAMA CARE.

THEY USUALLY DON'T HAVE HEALTH CARE PROBLEMS -- THEY USUALLY DON'T HAVE HEALTH CARE PROBLEMS -- >> THIS IS WHAT -- BUT WAIT WAIT CARE PROBLEMS -- >> THIS IS WHAT -- BUT WAIT WAIT A MINUTE.

>> THIS IS WHAT -- BUT WAIT WAIT A MINUTE.

>> THEY GO, THIS LOOKS GOOD.

A MINUTE.

>> THEY GO, THIS LOOKS GOOD.

SIGN ME UP.

>> THEY GO, THIS LOOKS GOOD.

SIGN ME UP.

>> BUT WHY -- THAT'S WHAT'S SIGN ME UP.

>> BUT WHY -- THAT'S WHAT'S SURPRISING YOUNG PEOPLE DON'T -- >> BUT WHY -- THAT'S WHAT'S SURPRISING YOUNG PEOPLE DON'T -- >> THEY HAVEN'T EXPERIENCED SURPRISING YOUNG PEOPLE DON'T -- >> THEY HAVEN'T EXPERIENCED MEDICARE AND >> THEY HAVEN'T EXPERIENCED MEDICARE AND GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED HEALTH MEDICARE AND GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED HEALTH CARE.

GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED HEALTH CARE.

>> THAT'S NOT SURPRISING.

CARE.

>> THAT'S NOT SURPRISING.

>> NO, NO, IT'S NOT THAT.

>> THAT'S NOT SURPRISING.

>> NO, NO, IT'S NOT THAT.

THEY ARE ALL POOR FIRST OF ALL, >> NO, NO, IT'S NOT THAT.

THEY ARE ALL POOR FIRST OF ALL, YOU GET OUT OF COLLEGE YOU DON'T THEY ARE ALL POOR FIRST OF ALL, YOU GET OUT OF COLLEGE YOU DON'T HAVE MONEY OR YOU GET OUT OF YOU GET OUT OF COLLEGE YOU DON'T HAVE MONEY OR YOU GET OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL, WORSE, YOU HAVE MONEY OR YOU GET OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL, WORSE, YOU CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE MONEY TO HIGH SCHOOL, WORSE, YOU CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE MONEY TO PAY FOR THINGS OTHER THAN CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE MONEY TO PAY FOR THINGS OTHER THAN RENT -- PUTTING HOUSE OVER YOUR PAY FOR THINGS OTHER THAN RENT -- PUTTING HOUSE OVER YOUR HEAD AND FOOD ON THE TABLE.

RENT -- PUTTING HOUSE OVER YOUR HEAD AND FOOD ON THE TABLE.

THEY DON'T HAVE PEOPLE -- HEAD AND FOOD ON THE TABLE.

THEY DON'T HAVE PEOPLE -- >> LOT OF THEM AREN'T BUYING THEY DON'T HAVE PEOPLE -- >> LOT OF THEM AREN'T BUYING CARS.

>> LOT OF THEM AREN'T BUYING CARS.

>> BONNIE, A LOT OF FOLKS NOTE CARS.

>> BONNIE, A LOT OF FOLKS NOTE THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE FREE.

>> BONNIE, A LOT OF FOLKS NOTE THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE FREE.

EVEN IN THE EXCHANGES THIS IS THIS IS NOT GOING TO BE FREE.

EVEN IN THE EXCHANGES THIS IS NOT FREE HEALTH CARE.

EVEN IN THE EXCHANGES THIS IS NOT FREE HEALTH CARE.

IT'S GOING TO COST AND MANY -- NOT FREE HEALTH CARE.

IT'S GOING TO COST AND MANY -- >> NOT MUCH.

IT'S GOING TO COST AND MANY -- >> NOT MUCH.

>> HOW MUCH IS IT?

>> NOT MUCH.

>> HOW MUCH IS IT?

>> IT DEPENDS WHERE YOU'RE GOING >> HOW MUCH IS IT?

>> IT DEPENDS WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO BE AND WHAT WE'RE LEARN INK >> IT DEPENDS WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO BE AND WHAT WE'RE LEARN INK MANY STATES PREMIUMS ARE ALREADY TO BE AND WHAT WE'RE LEARN INK MANY STATES PREMIUMS ARE ALREADY GOING UP AND IT'S COSTING FAR MANY STATES PREMIUMS ARE ALREADY GOING UP AND IT'S COSTING FAR MORE EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK THAN GOING UP AND IT'S COSTING FAR MORE EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK THAN OBAMA PROMISED.

MORE EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK THAN OBAMA PROMISED.

>> IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT KAISER OBAMA PROMISED.

>> IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT KAISER JUST RELEASED A REPORT THEY >> IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT KAISER JUST RELEASED A REPORT THEY RELEASED THAT IT'S GOING TO BE JUST RELEASED A REPORT THEY RELEASED THAT IT'S GOING TO BE LOWER THAN THEY THOUGHT ABOUT 06 RELEASED THAT IT'S GOING TO BE LOWER THAN THEY THOUGHT ABOUT 06 TO 70 DOLLARS FOR THE PEOPLE WHO LOWER THAN THEY THOUGHT ABOUT 06 TO 70 DOLLARS FOR THE PEOPLE WHO GET THE BRONZE PACKAGE, WHICH IS TO 70 DOLLARS FOR THE PEOPLE WHO GET THE BRONZE PACKAGE, WHICH IS FOR THE YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE GET THE BRONZE PACKAGE, WHICH IS FOR THE YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE VERY HEALTHY.

FOR THE YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE VERY HEALTHY.

BUT WHAT I THINK SO GREAT ABOUT VERY HEALTHY.

BUT WHAT I THINK SO GREAT ABOUT THESE NUMBERS -- BUT WHAT I THINK SO GREAT ABOUT THESE NUMBERS -- >> FUNDS NOR HEALTH INSURANCE?

THESE NUMBERS -- >> FUNDS NOR HEALTH INSURANCE?

>> THAT'S WHAT I THINK THE >> FUNDS NOR HEALTH INSURANCE?

>> THAT'S WHAT I THINK THE KAISER REPORT IS SAYING.

>> THAT'S WHAT I THINK THE KAISER REPORT IS SAYING.

65 AND OLDER THOSE PEOPLE ARE KAISER REPORT IS SAYING.

65 AND OLDER THOSE PEOPLE ARE IRRELEVANT AS FAR AS THIS IS 65 AND OLDER THOSE PEOPLE ARE IRRELEVANT AS FAR AS THIS IS CONCERNED FOR OBAMA CARE THESE IRRELEVANT AS FAR AS THIS IS CONCERNED FOR OBAMA CARE THESE NUMBERS COULD NOT BE BETTER.

CONCERNED FOR OBAMA CARE THESE NUMBERS COULD NOT BE BETTER.

BECAUSE THIS PROGRAM IS GOING TO NUMBERS COULD NOT BE BETTER.

BECAUSE THIS PROGRAM IS GOING TO SUCCEED OR FAIL BASED ON WHAT BECAUSE THIS PROGRAM IS GOING TO SUCCEED OR FAIL BASED ON WHAT THESE YOUNG HEALTHY PEOPLE DO.

SUCCEED OR FAIL BASED ON WHAT THESE YOUNG HEALTHY PEOPLE DO.

IF THESE NUMBERS ARE RIGHT THIS THESE YOUNG HEALTHY PEOPLE DO.

IF THESE NUMBERS ARE RIGHT THIS IS PREDICTS VERY WELL FOR NEXT IF THESE NUMBERS ARE RIGHT THIS IS PREDICTS VERY WELL FOR NEXT MONTH.

IS PREDICTS VERY WELL FOR NEXT MONTH.

>> WHEN YOU LOOK AT THOSE MONTH.

>> WHEN YOU LOOK AT THOSE NUMBERS 70 BUCKS A MONTH NOR A >> WHEN YOU LOOK AT THOSE NUMBERS 70 BUCKS A MONTH NOR A YOUNG PERSON WHO DOES NOT HAVE A NUMBERS 70 BUCKS A MONTH NOR A YOUNG PERSON WHO DOES NOT HAVE A JOB IS A LOT OF MONEY.

YOUNG PERSON WHO DOES NOT HAVE A JOB IS A LOT OF MONEY.

IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO JUST GO JOB IS A LOT OF MONEY.

IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO JUST GO AHEAD AND TAKE THE PENALTY FOR IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO JUST GO AHEAD AND TAKE THE PENALTY FOR NOT HAVING HEALTH CARE THAN TO AHEAD AND TAKE THE PENALTY FOR NOT HAVING HEALTH CARE THAN TO PAY -- NOT HAVING HEALTH CARE THAN TO PAY -- >> IS GOING TO COST HOW MUCH?

PAY -- >> IS GOING TO COST HOW MUCH?

>> THE PENALTY FOR NOT HAVING >> IS GOING TO COST HOW MUCH?

>> THE PENALTY FOR NOT HAVING THE HEALTH CARE ALSO VARIES STEP >> THE PENALTY FOR NOT HAVING THE HEALTH CARE ALSO VARIES STEP DEPENDING ON CERTAIN THINGS.

THE HEALTH CARE ALSO VARIES STEP DEPENDING ON CERTAIN THINGS.

>> WE'RE TALKING ABOUT -- GO DEPENDING ON CERTAIN THINGS.

>> WE'RE TALKING ABOUT -- GO AHEAD.

>> WE'RE TALKING ABOUT -- GO AHEAD.

>> THEY'RE TO THE DOING THAT AHEAD.

>> THEY'RE TO THE DOING THAT BECAUSE THEY ARE SHOPPING FOR >> THEY'RE TO THE DOING THAT BECAUSE THEY ARE SHOPPING FOR INFORMATION.

BECAUSE THEY ARE SHOPPING FOR INFORMATION.

AND THAT IS WHAT YOUNG PEOPLE DO INFORMATION.

AND THAT IS WHAT YOUNG PEOPLE DO AND WHAT THE IDEOLOGICAL DRIVEN AND THAT IS WHAT YOUNG PEOPLE DO AND WHAT THE IDEOLOGICAL DRIVEN AT THIS TABLE HAVE NOT DONE.

AND WHAT THE IDEOLOGICAL DRIVEN AT THIS TABLE HAVE NOT DONE.

THEY HAVE JUST DECIDED IT'S BAD.

AT THIS TABLE HAVE NOT DONE.

THEY HAVE JUST DECIDED IT'S BAD.

WHAT THESE YOUNG PEOPLE ARE THEY HAVE JUST DECIDED IT'S BAD.

WHAT THESE YOUNG PEOPLE ARE DOING ARE COMMUNICATING THROUGH WHAT THESE YOUNG PEOPLE ARE DOING ARE COMMUNICATING THROUGH THEIR MULTI-MEDIA, SOCIAL MEDIA, DOING ARE COMMUNICATING THROUGH THEIR MULTI-MEDIA, SOCIAL MEDIA, FIND CAN OUT, MY GOODNESS, ALSO THEIR MULTI-MEDIA, SOCIAL MEDIA, FIND CAN OUT, MY GOODNESS, ALSO A LOT OF THE INFORMATION HAS FIND CAN OUT, MY GOODNESS, ALSO A LOT OF THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DRIVEN BY THE A LOT OF THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DRIVEN BY THE ADMINISTRATION AT YOUNG PEOPLE BEEN DRIVEN BY THE ADMINISTRATION AT YOUNG PEOPLE RECOGNIZING THAT THEY REALLY ARE ADMINISTRATION AT YOUNG PEOPLE RECOGNIZING THAT THEY REALLY ARE THE BOTTOM LINE FOR THIS.

RECOGNIZING THAT THEY REALLY ARE THE BOTTOM LINE FOR THIS.

>> I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHERE THE BOTTOM LINE FOR THIS.

>> I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHERE EVERYBODY IS COMING TO THIS >> I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHERE EVERYBODY IS COMING TO THIS CONCLUSION THAT YOUNG PEOPLE ARE EVERYBODY IS COMING TO THIS CONCLUSION THAT YOUNG PEOPLE ARE GOING TO END UP BUYING IN TO THE CONCLUSION THAT YOUNG PEOPLE ARE GOING TO END UP BUYING IN TO THE HE CAN CHANGES.

GOING TO END UP BUYING IN TO THE HE CAN CHANGES.

WHERE IS THAT INFORMATION COMING HE CAN CHANGES.

WHERE IS THAT INFORMATION COMING FROM?

WHERE IS THAT INFORMATION COMING FROM?

BECAUSE WE'RE NOT SEEING IT.

FROM?

BECAUSE WE'RE NOT SEEING IT.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE STUDY THAT WE BECAUSE WE'RE NOT SEEING IT.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE STUDY THAT WE LOOKED AT ONLY 11% OF YOUNG IF YOU LOOK AT THE STUDY THAT WE LOOKED AT ONLY 11% OF YOUNG PEOPLE SAID THAT THEY WERE LOOKED AT ONLY 11% OF YOUNG PEOPLE SAID THAT THEY WERE DEFINITELY GOING TO BE BUYING IN PEOPLE SAID THAT THEY WERE DEFINITELY GOING TO BE BUYING IN TO THE EXCHANGES, 24% SAID THEY DEFINITELY GOING TO BE BUYING IN TO THE EXCHANGES, 24% SAID THEY WERE LIKELY TOE BUY IN TO THE TO THE EXCHANGES, 24% SAID THEY WERE LIKELY TOE BUY IN TO THE EXCHANGES, ONLY 11% SAID THAT WERE LIKELY TOE BUY IN TO THE EXCHANGES, ONLY 11% SAID THAT THEY WERE DEFINITELY GOING TO -- EXCHANGES, ONLY 11% SAID THAT THEY WERE DEFINITELY GOING TO -- >> HERE IS THE QUESTION FOR YOU.

THEY WERE DEFINITELY GOING TO -- >> HERE IS THE QUESTION FOR YOU.

I ASKED A YOUNG PERSON WHETHER >> HERE IS THE QUESTION FOR YOU.

I ASKED A YOUNG PERSON WHETHER HE WAS GOING TO BUY IN TO THE I ASKED A YOUNG PERSON WHETHER HE WAS GOING TO BUY IN TO THE EXCHANGE AND HE SAID, OF COURSE, HE WAS GOING TO BUY IN TO THE EXCHANGE AND HE SAID, OF COURSE, I SAID, WHY?

EXCHANGE AND HE SAID, OF COURSE, I SAID, WHY?

AND HE SAID, BECAUSE JOBS NO I SAID, WHY?

AND HE SAID, BECAUSE JOBS NO LONGER COME WITH HEALTH AND HE SAID, BECAUSE JOBS NO LONGER COME WITH HEALTH INSURANCE.

LONGER COME WITH HEALTH INSURANCE.

>> IS THAT A REASON?

INSURANCE.

>> IS THAT A REASON?

>> EVEN NEWER JOBS.

>> IS THAT A REASON?

>> EVEN NEWER JOBS.

WE NOW KNOW OBAMA CARE NOT >> EVEN NEWER JOBS.

WE NOW KNOW OBAMA CARE NOT OFFICIALLY GONE IN TO AFFECT.

WE NOW KNOW OBAMA CARE NOT OFFICIALLY GONE IN TO AFFECT.

THE REPORT CAME OUT A COUPLE OFFICIALLY GONE IN TO AFFECT.

THE REPORT CAME OUT A COUPLE WEEKS AGO SHOWING THEY NOW THE REPORT CAME OUT A COUPLE WEEKS AGO SHOWING THEY NOW PROVEN OVER 250 BUSINESSES WEEKS AGO SHOWING THEY NOW PROVEN OVER 250 BUSINESSES ACROSS THE COUNTRY SOME VERY PROVEN OVER 250 BUSINESSES ACROSS THE COUNTRY SOME VERY LARGE ONES HAVE EITHER ACROSS THE COUNTRY SOME VERY LARGE ONES HAVE EITHER COMPLETELY CUT JOBS, REDUCED LARGE ONES HAVE EITHER COMPLETELY CUT JOBS, REDUCED HOURS SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO PAY COMPLETELY CUT JOBS, REDUCED HOURS SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO PAY HEALTHCARE COSTS, HE'S RIGHT HOURS SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO PAY HEALTHCARE COSTS, HE'S RIGHT ABOUT THAT.

HEALTHCARE COSTS, HE'S RIGHT ABOUT THAT.

THE WHOLE GOAL HERE FOLKS, ABOUT THAT.

THE WHOLE GOAL HERE FOLKS, EVERYBODY NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THE WHOLE GOAL HERE FOLKS, EVERYBODY NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THIS, IS TO GET ANYBODY OUT OF EVERYBODY NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THIS, IS TO GET ANYBODY OUT OF PRIVATE INSURANCE, THEY DON'T THIS, IS TO GET ANYBODY OUT OF PRIVATE INSURANCE, THEY DON'T WANT THAT EX TEST ANY MORE WANT PRIVATE INSURANCE, THEY DON'T WANT THAT EX TEST ANY MORE WANT EVERYBODY IN THE GOVERNMENT HE WANT THAT EX TEST ANY MORE WANT EVERYBODY IN THE GOVERNMENT HE CAN CHANGES.

EVERYBODY IN THE GOVERNMENT HE CAN CHANGES.

PASSING A LAW THAT DRIVES CAN CHANGES.

PASSING A LAW THAT DRIVES BUSINESSES TO HAVE TO GIVE UP PASSING A LAW THAT DRIVES BUSINESSES TO HAVE TO GIVE UP HEALTH CARE COVERAGE PUTS MORE BUSINESSES TO HAVE TO GIVE UP HEALTH CARE COVERAGE PUTS MORE PEOPLE IN -- HEALTH CARE COVERAGE PUTS MORE PEOPLE IN -- >> THE PRIVATE INSURANCE PEOPLE IN -- >> THE PRIVATE INSURANCE INDUSTRY.

>> THE PRIVATE INSURANCE INDUSTRY.

THAT IS NOT -- INDUSTRY.

THAT IS NOT -- >> WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

THAT IS NOT -- >> WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

WHO IS GOING TO PROVIDE THE >> WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

WHO IS GOING TO PROVIDE THE INSURANCE?

WHO IS GOING TO PROVIDE THE INSURANCE?

[ ALL TALKING AT ONCE ] INSURANCE?

[ ALL TALKING AT ONCE ] >> I THOUGHT INSURANCE COMPANIES [ ALL TALKING AT ONCE ] >> I THOUGHT INSURANCE COMPANIES USED TO BE THE BAD GUYS.

>> I THOUGHT INSURANCE COMPANIES USED TO BE THE BAD GUYS.

>> THE INSURANCE COMPANIES WERE USED TO BE THE BAD GUYS.

>> THE INSURANCE COMPANIES WERE VERY MUCH IN THE COALITION IN >> THE INSURANCE COMPANIES WERE VERY MUCH IN THE COALITION IN THE BEGINNING AND THE INSURANCE VERY MUCH IN THE COALITION IN THE BEGINNING AND THE INSURANCE COMPANIES -- THE BEGINNING AND THE INSURANCE COMPANIES -- >> BECAUSE OF THIS -- COMPANIES -- >> BECAUSE OF THIS -- >> THEY ARE GOING TO GET MORE >> BECAUSE OF THIS -- >> THEY ARE GOING TO GET MORE CUSTOMERS.

>> THEY ARE GOING TO GET MORE CUSTOMERS.

>> BY UNCLE SAM PAY LESS FOR CUSTOMERS.

>> BY UNCLE SAM PAY LESS FOR THOSE FOLKS -- >> BY UNCLE SAM PAY LESS FOR THOSE FOLKS -- >> WE ARE PAYING -- PEOPLE ARE THOSE FOLKS -- >> WE ARE PAYING -- PEOPLE ARE PAYING SUPPLEMENTS.

>> WE ARE PAYING -- PEOPLE ARE PAYING SUPPLEMENTS.

[ ALL TALKING AT ONCE ] PAYING SUPPLEMENTS.

[ ALL TALKING AT ONCE ] >> WE HAD UNINSURED PEOPLE WITH [ ALL TALKING AT ONCE ] >> WE HAD UNINSURED PEOPLE WITH VERY LITTLE MONEY WHO NOW CAN >> WE HAD UNINSURED PEOPLE WITH VERY LITTLE MONEY WHO NOW CAN GET INSURANCE WITH THE VERY LITTLE MONEY WHO NOW CAN GET INSURANCE WITH THE SUPPLEMENTS COMING FROM THE GET INSURANCE WITH THE SUPPLEMENTS COMING FROM THE GOVERNMENT THAT MEANS MORE SUPPLEMENTS COMING FROM THE GOVERNMENT THAT MEANS MORE CUSTOMERS -- GOVERNMENT THAT MEANS MORE CUSTOMERS -- >> BUT THE GOVERNMENT -- CUSTOMERS -- >> BUT THE GOVERNMENT -- >> LET ME -- >> BUT THE GOVERNMENT -- >> LET ME -- >> LISTEN, ONE AT A TIME OR >> LET ME -- >> LISTEN, ONE AT A TIME OR NOBODY GETS HEARD.

>> LISTEN, ONE AT A TIME OR NOBODY GETS HEARD.

>> I JUST WANTED TO GO BACK TO NOBODY GETS HEARD.

>> I JUST WANTED TO GO BACK TO YOUR ORIGINAL POINT.

>> I JUST WANTED TO GO BACK TO YOUR ORIGINAL POINT.

HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST YOUNG YOUR ORIGINAL POINT.

HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST YOUNG PEOPLE TO OPT OUT OF THIS.

HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST YOUNG PEOPLE TO OPT OUT OF THIS.

IT'S $95 OR 1% OF THEIR ANNUAL PEOPLE TO OPT OUT OF THIS.

IT'S $95 OR 1% OF THEIR ANNUAL INCOME BACK TO YOUR POINT ABOUT IT'S $95 OR 1% OF THEIR ANNUAL INCOME BACK TO YOUR POINT ABOUT IT BEING 70 DOLLARS A MONTH I'D INCOME BACK TO YOUR POINT ABOUT IT BEING 70 DOLLARS A MONTH I'D RATHER PAY $95 JUST OPT OUT.

IT BEING 70 DOLLARS A MONTH I'D RATHER PAY $95 JUST OPT OUT.

>> LET YOU KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

RATHER PAY $95 JUST OPT OUT.

>> LET YOU KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER >> LET YOU KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE.

FROM HEALTHCARE TO ROMANCE.

@BONNIEERBE.

FROM HEALTHCARE TO ROMANCE.

MORE INTERRACIAL COUPLES ARE FROM HEALTHCARE TO ROMANCE.

MORE INTERRACIAL COUPLES ARE DATING, BUT THEY'RE NOT GETTING MORE INTERRACIAL COUPLES ARE DATING, BUT THEY'RE NOT GETTING MARRIED AT THE SAME RATE AS DATING, BUT THEY'RE NOT GETTING MARRIED AT THE SAME RATE AS OTHER COUPLES.

MARRIED AT THE SAME RATE AS OTHER COUPLES.

THE CENSUS BUREAU REPORTS OTHER COUPLES.

THE CENSUS BUREAU REPORTS INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE HAS DOUBLED THE CENSUS BUREAU REPORTS INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE HAS DOUBLED SINCE THE YEAR 2000.

INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE HAS DOUBLED SINCE THE YEAR 2000.

BUT MIXED RACE COUPLES STILL SINCE THE YEAR 2000.

BUT MIXED RACE COUPLES STILL MAKE UP JUST 4% OF MARRIAGES.

BUT MIXED RACE COUPLES STILL MAKE UP JUST 4% OF MARRIAGES.

RESEARCHERS FOUND MIXED RACE MAKE UP JUST 4% OF MARRIAGES.

RESEARCHERS FOUND MIXED RACE COUPLES ARE MORE LIKELY TO LIVE RESEARCHERS FOUND MIXED RACE COUPLES ARE MORE LIKELY TO LIVE TOGETHER THAN MARRY.

COUPLES ARE MORE LIKELY TO LIVE TOGETHER THAN MARRY.

THIS COULD BE DUE TO FAMILY.

TOGETHER THAN MARRY.

THIS COULD BE DUE TO FAMILY.

HOW ONE VIEWS ANOTHER RACE IS THIS COULD BE DUE TO FAMILY.

HOW ONE VIEWS ANOTHER RACE IS PASSED DOWN THROUGH GENERATIONS.

HOW ONE VIEWS ANOTHER RACE IS PASSED DOWN THROUGH GENERATIONS.

WHILE YOUNGER PEOPLE MAY HAVE NO PASSED DOWN THROUGH GENERATIONS.

WHILE YOUNGER PEOPLE MAY HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH INTERRACIAL DATING WHILE YOUNGER PEOPLE MAY HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH INTERRACIAL DATING OR MARRIAGE, OLDER GENERATIONS PROBLEM WITH INTERRACIAL DATING OR MARRIAGE, OLDER GENERATIONS ARE MORE RESISTANT.

OR MARRIAGE, OLDER GENERATIONS ARE MORE RESISTANT.

RACIAL BOUNDARIES HAVE AFFECTED ARE MORE RESISTANT.

RACIAL BOUNDARIES HAVE AFFECTED AMERICAN SOCIETY, AND WILL RACIAL BOUNDARIES HAVE AFFECTED AMERICAN SOCIETY, AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO UNTIL AMERICAN SOCIETY, AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO UNTIL COLOR-BLINDNESS IS BLURRED.

CONTINUE TO DO SO UNTIL COLOR-BLINDNESS IS BLURRED.

JUST GOT MARRIED, IS RACE A COLOR-BLINDNESS IS BLURRED.

JUST GOT MARRIED, IS RACE A FACTOR STILL FOR PEOPLE YOUR AGE JUST GOT MARRIED, IS RACE A FACTOR STILL FOR PEOPLE YOUR AGE AND MARRIAGE?

FACTOR STILL FOR PEOPLE YOUR AGE AND MARRIAGE?

>> I THINK THAT THIS IS MUCH AND MARRIAGE?

>> I THINK THAT THIS IS MUCH MORE OF A CULTURAL ISSUE THAN IT >> I THINK THAT THIS IS MUCH MORE OF A CULTURAL ISSUE THAN IT IS A RACIAL ISSUE.

MORE OF A CULTURAL ISSUE THAN IT IS A RACIAL ISSUE.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE OVERALL IS A RACIAL ISSUE.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE OVERALL NUMBER OF YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE IF YOU LOOK AT THE OVERALL NUMBER OF YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE LIVING TOGETHER VERSUS GETTING NUMBER OF YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE LIVING TOGETHER VERSUS GETTING MARRIED OR PEOPLE GENERALLY, LIVING TOGETHER VERSUS GETTING MARRIED OR PEOPLE GENERALLY, THERE -- THE CDC SHOWS THAT FOR MARRIED OR PEOPLE GENERALLY, THERE -- THE CDC SHOWS THAT FOR WOMEN WHO ARE 18 TO 44 THAT THE THERE -- THE CDC SHOWS THAT FOR WOMEN WHO ARE 18 TO 44 THAT THE MAJORITY OF THOSE WOMEN ARE MORE WOMEN WHO ARE 18 TO 44 THAT THE MAJORITY OF THOSE WOMEN ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE LIVING WITH A MAJORITY OF THOSE WOMEN ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE LIVING WITH A PARTNER THAN MARRIED.

LIKELY TO BE LIVING WITH A PARTNER THAN MARRIED.

AND I THINK THAT IS WHY THIS PARTNER THAN MARRIED.

AND I THINK THAT IS WHY THIS CULTURAL NOT RACIAL.

AND I THINK THAT IS WHY THIS CULTURAL NOT RACIAL.

>> AMONG YOUR FRIENDS, DO YOU CULTURAL NOT RACIAL.

>> AMONG YOUR FRIENDS, DO YOU SEE MORE BIRACIAL COUPLES LIVING >> AMONG YOUR FRIENDS, DO YOU SEE MORE BIRACIAL COUPLES LIVING TOGETHER THAN GETTING MARRIED?

SEE MORE BIRACIAL COUPLES LIVING TOGETHER THAN GETTING MARRIED?

>> YOU KNOW, I HAVEN'T REALLY TOGETHER THAN GETTING MARRIED?

>> YOU KNOW, I HAVEN'T REALLY NOTICED THAT TREND.

>> YOU KNOW, I HAVEN'T REALLY NOTICED THAT TREND.

THAT'S NOT SOMETHING I THINK NOTICED THAT TREND.

THAT'S NOT SOMETHING I THINK THAT GENERALLY PEOPLE MY AGE THAT'S NOT SOMETHING I THINK THAT GENERALLY PEOPLE MY AGE LOOK AT.

THAT GENERALLY PEOPLE MY AGE LOOK AT.

THE 50th MARCH ON WASHINGTON I LOOK AT.

THE 50th MARCH ON WASHINGTON I JUST DON'T THINK THAT GENERALLY THE 50th MARCH ON WASHINGTON I JUST DON'T THINK THAT GENERALLY THE PEOPLE ARE LOOKING AT COLOR JUST DON'T THINK THAT GENERALLY THE PEOPLE ARE LOOKING AT COLOR OF SKIN WHEN IT COMES TO -- THE PEOPLE ARE LOOKING AT COLOR OF SKIN WHEN IT COMES TO -- >> CULTURAL AND RACIAL IS OFTEN OF SKIN WHEN IT COMES TO -- >> CULTURAL AND RACIAL IS OFTEN THE SAME THING BECAUSE OF THE >> CULTURAL AND RACIAL IS OFTEN THE SAME THING BECAUSE OF THE WAY WE GROW UP AND OUR CULTURE.

THE SAME THING BECAUSE OF THE WAY WE GROW UP AND OUR CULTURE.

I THINK THAT THESE NUMBERS ARE WAY WE GROW UP AND OUR CULTURE.

I THINK THAT THESE NUMBERS ARE GOING TO REMAIN LOW AND THAT I THINK THAT THESE NUMBERS ARE GOING TO REMAIN LOW AND THAT PEOPLE ARE TRYING OUT GOING TO REMAIN LOW AND THAT PEOPLE ARE TRYING OUT INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE FOR FIRST PEOPLE ARE TRYING OUT INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE FOR FIRST TIME AND WHY JUST JUMP IN TO IT INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE FOR FIRST TIME AND WHY JUST JUMP IN TO IT ESPECIALLY WHEN YOUR FAMILY TIME AND WHY JUST JUMP IN TO IT ESPECIALLY WHEN YOUR FAMILY MIGHT BE UPSET.

ESPECIALLY WHEN YOUR FAMILY MIGHT BE UPSET.

LET'S SEE WHAT IT'S LIKE.

MIGHT BE UPSET.

LET'S SEE WHAT IT'S LIKE.

IN FACT WE SEE THIS LIVING LET'S SEE WHAT IT'S LIKE.

IN FACT WE SEE THIS LIVING TOGETHER IS THE WAY OF THAT IN FACT WE SEE THIS LIVING TOGETHER IS THE WAY OF THAT ENTIRE GENERATION.

TOGETHER IS THE WAY OF THAT ENTIRE GENERATION.

THEY MIGHT BE TRIKE OUT A LOT OF ENTIRE GENERATION.

THEY MIGHT BE TRIKE OUT A LOT OF THINGS BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT THEY MIGHT BE TRIKE OUT A LOT OF THINGS BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT GETTING MARRIED SOON.

THINGS BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT GETTING MARRIED SOON.

>> I DO THINK IT'S GREAT BECAUSE GETTING MARRIED SOON.

>> I DO THINK IT'S GREAT BECAUSE THE YOUNG GENERATION IS COLOR >> I DO THINK IT'S GREAT BECAUSE THE YOUNG GENERATION IS COLOR BLIND.

THE YOUNG GENERATION IS COLOR BLIND.

WHEN YOU THINK THAT IN MY BLIND.

WHEN YOU THINK THAT IN MY LIFETIME LOVING VERSUS VIRGINIA, WHEN YOU THINK THAT IN MY LIFETIME LOVING VERSUS VIRGINIA, RICHARD LOVING GOT MARRIED IN LIFETIME LOVING VERSUS VIRGINIA, RICHARD LOVING GOT MARRIED IN 1958 WITHIN COUPLE YEARS THEY RICHARD LOVING GOT MARRIED IN 1958 WITHIN COUPLE YEARS THEY HAD POLICE RAIDING THEIR 1958 WITHIN COUPLE YEARS THEY HAD POLICE RAIDING THEIR BEDROOM, THEY WERE FORCED OUT OF HAD POLICE RAIDING THEIR BEDROOM, THEY WERE FORCED OUT OF VIRGINIA.

BEDROOM, THEY WERE FORCED OUT OF VIRGINIA.

FINALLY HE WENT TO ROBERT VIRGINIA.

FINALLY HE WENT TO ROBERT KENNEDY WHO HOOKED HIM UP WITH FINALLY HE WENT TO ROBERT KENNEDY WHO HOOKED HIM UP WITH THE UCLU IT WAS THIS COURT CASE KENNEDY WHO HOOKED HIM UP WITH THE UCLU IT WAS THIS COURT CASE THAT LOST EVERY OTHER APPEAL THE UCLU IT WAS THIS COURT CASE THAT LOST EVERY OTHER APPEAL THAT THEY WENT TO THE SUPREME THAT LOST EVERY OTHER APPEAL THAT THEY WENT TO THE SUPREME COURT.

THAT THEY WENT TO THE SUPREME COURT.

THAT WAS THE END OF THESE LAWS COURT.

THAT WAS THE END OF THESE LAWS IN 17 STATES THAT PROHIBITED THAT WAS THE END OF THESE LAWS IN 17 STATES THAT PROHIBITED COUPLES FROM HAVING A LOVING IN 17 STATES THAT PROHIBITED COUPLES FROM HAVING A LOVING RELATIONSHIP.

COUPLES FROM HAVING A LOVING RELATIONSHIP.

SO I LOVE THE FACT THAT WE'RE RELATIONSHIP.

SO I LOVE THE FACT THAT WE'RE GETTING TO THIS POINT AND SO I LOVE THE FACT THAT WE'RE GETTING TO THIS POINT AND RELATIONSHIPS, PEOPLE HAVE THEIR GETTING TO THIS POINT AND RELATIONSHIPS, PEOPLE HAVE THEIR INDEPENDENT CHOICES TO MAKE AND RELATIONSHIPS, PEOPLE HAVE THEIR INDEPENDENT CHOICES TO MAKE AND THAT THEY'RE DOING SO WITHOUT INDEPENDENT CHOICES TO MAKE AND THAT THEY'RE DOING SO WITHOUT LOOKING AT RACE.

THAT THEY'RE DOING SO WITHOUT LOOKING AT RACE.

>> I THINK WE'VE GOT NUMBERS AND LOOKING AT RACE.

>> I THINK WE'VE GOT NUMBERS AND STATISTICS BUT ANYBODY JUST >> I THINK WE'VE GOT NUMBERS AND STATISTICS BUT ANYBODY JUST WALKING OUTSIDE ANECDOTALLY STATISTICS BUT ANYBODY JUST WALKING OUTSIDE ANECDOTALLY SHE'S A LOT MORE INTERRACIAL WALKING OUTSIDE ANECDOTALLY SHE'S A LOT MORE INTERRACIAL COUPLES OUT THERE WHETHER SHE'S A LOT MORE INTERRACIAL COUPLES OUT THERE WHETHER THEY'RE MARRIED OR DATING OR COUPLES OUT THERE WHETHER THEY'RE MARRIED OR DATING OR WHAT HAVE YOU.

THEY'RE MARRIED OR DATING OR WHAT HAVE YOU.

I CAN TELL FROM I WAS GROWING WHAT HAVE YOU.

I CAN TELL FROM I WAS GROWING UP, I WAS BORN AFTER THAT I CAN TELL FROM I WAS GROWING UP, I WAS BORN AFTER THAT DECISION BY THE WAY, YOU JUST UP, I WAS BORN AFTER THAT DECISION BY THE WAY, YOU JUST SEE IT AND PEOPLE DON'T THINK -- DECISION BY THE WAY, YOU JUST SEE IT AND PEOPLE DON'T THINK -- CHURCHES I'VE GONE TO THERE IS SEE IT AND PEOPLE DON'T THINK -- CHURCHES I'VE GONE TO THERE IS MORE INTERRACIAL COUPLES IN A CHURCHES I'VE GONE TO THERE IS MORE INTERRACIAL COUPLES IN A LOT OF DIFFERENT PLACES THAN MORE INTERRACIAL COUPLES IN A LOT OF DIFFERENT PLACES THAN THERE USED TO BE M. A GREAT LOT OF DIFFERENT PLACES THAN THERE USED TO BE M. A GREAT THING.

THERE USED TO BE M. A GREAT THING.

>> DO YOU THINK THAT THEY ARE THING.

>> DO YOU THINK THAT THEY ARE DATING MORE -- THAT THEY'RE >> DO YOU THINK THAT THEY ARE DATING MORE -- THAT THEY'RE STILL BARRIER TO GETTING DATING MORE -- THAT THEY'RE STILL BARRIER TO GETTING MARRIED?

STILL BARRIER TO GETTING MARRIED?

FRAN CHESS EXTRA'S POINT SINCE MARRIED?

FRAN CHESS EXTRA'S POINT SINCE WOMEN 18 TO 44 GENERALLY ARE -- FRAN CHESS EXTRA'S POINT SINCE WOMEN 18 TO 44 GENERALLY ARE -- >> RIGHT, EXACTLY.

WOMEN 18 TO 44 GENERALLY ARE -- >> RIGHT, EXACTLY.

>> I DON'T SEE THAT.

>> RIGHT, EXACTLY.

>> I DON'T SEE THAT.

OF COURSE I DON'T THINK IT'S A >> I DON'T SEE THAT.

OF COURSE I DON'T THINK IT'S A GREAT TREND THAT EVERYBODY IS OF COURSE I DON'T THINK IT'S A GREAT TREND THAT EVERYBODY IS LIVING TOGAS OPPOSED TO GETTING GREAT TREND THAT EVERYBODY IS LIVING TOGAS OPPOSED TO GETTING MARRIED.

LIVING TOGAS OPPOSED TO GETTING MARRIED.

I HAVEN'T SEEN IT JUST FROM MY MARRIED.

I HAVEN'T SEEN IT JUST FROM MY OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

I HAVEN'T SEEN IT JUST FROM MY OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

MOST OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

MOST OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE SERIOUSLY DATING, A MIXED MOST OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE SERIOUSLY DATING, A MIXED COUPLE, THEY STILL GOT MARRIED.

SERIOUSLY DATING, A MIXED COUPLE, THEY STILL GOT MARRIED.

>> I GUESS JUST SNOT SOMETHING COUPLE, THEY STILL GOT MARRIED.

>> I GUESS JUST SNOT SOMETHING THAT I WOULD HAVE NOTICED >> I GUESS JUST SNOT SOMETHING THAT I WOULD HAVE NOTICED BECAUSE I WAS ALSO BORN AFTER THAT I WOULD HAVE NOTICED BECAUSE I WAS ALSO BORN AFTER THAT SO THAT IS JUST NOT BECAUSE I WAS ALSO BORN AFTER THAT SO THAT IS JUST NOT SOMETHING THAT COMES UP IN YOUR THAT SO THAT IS JUST NOT SOMETHING THAT COMES UP IN YOUR DAILY LIFE.

SOMETHING THAT COMES UP IN YOUR DAILY LIFE.

IN 2013, I WAS ACTUALLY KIND OF DAILY LIFE.

IN 2013, I WAS ACTUALLY KIND OF SURPRISED WE WERE TALKING ABOUT IN 2013, I WAS ACTUALLY KIND OF SURPRISED WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING THAT SURPRISED WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING THAT HAD NEVER, EVER OCCURRED TO ME I THIS BECAUSE IT'S SOMETHING THAT HAD NEVER, EVER OCCURRED TO ME I GUESS TO BE ON THE LOOK OUT FOR.

HAD NEVER, EVER OCCURRED TO ME I GUESS TO BE ON THE LOOK OUT FOR.

>> BUT THE NUMBERS ARE SO SMALL.

GUESS TO BE ON THE LOOK OUT FOR.

>> BUT THE NUMBERS ARE SO SMALL.

I THINK IT DOES STILL OCCUR TO >> BUT THE NUMBERS ARE SO SMALL.

I THINK IT DOES STILL OCCUR TO THE AVERAGE PERSON AND MOST I THINK IT DOES STILL OCCUR TO THE AVERAGE PERSON AND MOST PEOPLE STILL ARE LOOKING FOR THE AVERAGE PERSON AND MOST PEOPLE STILL ARE LOOKING FOR MATES WITHIN THEIR OWN CULTURE, PEOPLE STILL ARE LOOKING FOR MATES WITHIN THEIR OWN CULTURE, THEIR OWN RACIAL GROUP.

MATES WITHIN THEIR OWN CULTURE, THEIR OWN RACIAL GROUP.

>> PART IS WHERE YOU LIVE.

THEIR OWN RACIAL GROUP.

>> PART IS WHERE YOU LIVE.

IF YOU'RE IN URBAN CENTERS YOU >> PART IS WHERE YOU LIVE.

IF YOU'RE IN URBAN CENTERS YOU SEE MORE OF THE MIXED COUPLES.

IF YOU'RE IN URBAN CENTERS YOU SEE MORE OF THE MIXED COUPLES.

BUT ALSO -- WHERE YOU GROW UP, SEE MORE OF THE MIXED COUPLES.

BUT ALSO -- WHERE YOU GROW UP, YOU'RE IN PREDOMINANTLY WHITE BUT ALSO -- WHERE YOU GROW UP, YOU'RE IN PREDOMINANTLY WHITE COMMUNITY YOU'RE GOING TO DATE YOU'RE IN PREDOMINANTLY WHITE COMMUNITY YOU'RE GOING TO DATE PREDOMINANTLY WHITE PEOPLE.

COMMUNITY YOU'RE GOING TO DATE PREDOMINANTLY WHITE PEOPLE.

IT'S CERTAINLY NOT THE NORM BUT PREDOMINANTLY WHITE PEOPLE.

IT'S CERTAINLY NOT THE NORM BUT I DON'T THINK -- IT'S CERTAINLY NOT THE NORM BUT I DON'T THINK -- >> WHAT IS THE COMMUNITY -- I DON'T THINK -- >> WHAT IS THE COMMUNITY -- >> WHEN I WENT TO COLLEGE I WENT >> WHAT IS THE COMMUNITY -- >> WHEN I WENT TO COLLEGE I WENT TO SCHOOL IN THE SOUTH AND I >> WHEN I WENT TO COLLEGE I WENT TO SCHOOL IN THE SOUTH AND I ACTUALLY DATED A GUY OF ANOTHER TO SCHOOL IN THE SOUTH AND I ACTUALLY DATED A GUY OF ANOTHER RACE AND I WILL TELL YOU WE GOT ACTUALLY DATED A GUY OF ANOTHER RACE AND I WILL TELL YOU WE GOT LOOKS WHEN WE WALKED IN TO SOME RACE AND I WILL TELL YOU WE GOT LOOKS WHEN WE WALKED IN TO SOME RESTAURANTS.

LOOKS WHEN WE WALKED IN TO SOME RESTAURANTS.

BUT YOU KNOW WHAT, TODAY I WOULD RESTAURANTS.

BUT YOU KNOW WHAT, TODAY I WOULD NEVER -- I DON'T THINK THAT BUT YOU KNOW WHAT, TODAY I WOULD NEVER -- I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD EASTBOUND HAPPEN THERE.

NEVER -- I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD EASTBOUND HAPPEN THERE.

>> YOU KNOW I DO THINK IT IS WOULD EASTBOUND HAPPEN THERE.

>> YOU KNOW I DO THINK IT IS GOOD THAT WE REMEMBER THE >> YOU KNOW I DO THINK IT IS GOOD THAT WE REMEMBER THE BUTLER, THE MOVIE "THE BUTLER" GOOD THAT WE REMEMBER THE BUTLER, THE MOVIE "THE BUTLER" MADE US RECOGNIZE WATCHING THAT BUTLER, THE MOVIE "THE BUTLER" MADE US RECOGNIZE WATCHING THAT MOVIE THAT WE HAD APARTHEID MADE US RECOGNIZE WATCHING THAT MOVIE THAT WE HAD APARTHEID GOING ON, LAWS ON THE BOOKS THAT MOVIE THAT WE HAD APARTHEID GOING ON, LAWS ON THE BOOKS THAT LEGISLATED THE SEPARATION OF OUR GOING ON, LAWS ON THE BOOKS THAT LEGISLATED THE SEPARATION OF OUR RACES AND I JUST THINK IT'S GOOD LEGISLATED THE SEPARATION OF OUR RACES AND I JUST THINK IT'S GOOD TO REMEMBER THE CONTEXT AND TO RACES AND I JUST THINK IT'S GOOD TO REMEMBER THE CONTEXT AND TO SEE THIS AS A GOOD THING.

TO REMEMBER THE CONTEXT AND TO SEE THIS AS A GOOD THING.

>> HOW MUCH DOES FAMILY OPINION SEE THIS AS A GOOD THING.

>> HOW MUCH DOES FAMILY OPINION MATTER ANY MORE IN MARRIAGE?

>> HOW MUCH DOES FAMILY OPINION MATTER ANY MORE IN MARRIAGE?

>> THAT'S PROBABLY THE CENTRAL MATTER ANY MORE IN MARRIAGE?

>> THAT'S PROBABLY THE CENTRAL INGREDIENT.

>> THAT'S PROBABLY THE CENTRAL INGREDIENT.

YOU WANT TO BE WITH SOMEBODY BUT INGREDIENT.

YOU WANT TO BE WITH SOMEBODY BUT DON'T WANT TO GO THROUGH THE YOU WANT TO BE WITH SOMEBODY BUT DON'T WANT TO GO THROUGH THE HASSLE OF TELLING YOUR MOMMA.

DON'T WANT TO GO THROUGH THE HASSLE OF TELLING YOUR MOMMA.

[ LAUGHTER ] HASSLE OF TELLING YOUR MOMMA.

[ LAUGHTER ] >> MY EXPERIENCE IS THE PARENTS [ LAUGHTER ] >> MY EXPERIENCE IS THE PARENTS ARE AGAINST IT THE CHILDREN ARE >> MY EXPERIENCE IS THE PARENTS ARE AGAINST IT THE CHILDREN ARE GOING TO DO IT.

ARE AGAINST IT THE CHILDREN ARE GOING TO DO IT.

[LAUGHTER] GOING TO DO IT.

[LAUGHTER] >> I'M NOT MARRIED AT THIS POINT [LAUGHTER] >> I'M NOT MARRIED AT THIS POINT THEY MIGHT BE HAPPY WITH >> I'M NOT MARRIED AT THIS POINT THEY MIGHT BE HAPPY WITH ANYBODY -- JUST KIDDING.

THEY MIGHT BE HAPPY WITH ANYBODY -- JUST KIDDING.

>> AS LONG AS HE'S -- ANYBODY -- JUST KIDDING.

>> AS LONG AS HE'S -- >> THAT'S A HUGE FACTOR.

>> AS LONG AS HE'S -- >> THAT'S A HUGE FACTOR.

I DON'T THINK THAT'S TRUE TO >> THAT'S A HUGE FACTOR.

I DON'T THINK THAT'S TRUE TO JUST ANY COMMUNITY L. YOU'RE I DON'T THINK THAT'S TRUE TO JUST ANY COMMUNITY L. YOU'RE BLACK, YOU'RE WHITE, WHATEVER JUST ANY COMMUNITY L. YOU'RE BLACK, YOU'RE WHITE, WHATEVER YOUR ETHNIC BACKGROUND FAMILIES BLACK, YOU'RE WHITE, WHATEVER YOUR ETHNIC BACKGROUND FAMILIES HE IS ESPECIALLY MEMBERS OF YOUR YOUR ETHNIC BACKGROUND FAMILIES HE IS ESPECIALLY MEMBERS OF YOUR FAMILY KIND OF WANT TO YOU STICK HE IS ESPECIALLY MEMBERS OF YOUR FAMILY KIND OF WANT TO YOU STICK WITH THAT.

FAMILY KIND OF WANT TO YOU STICK WITH THAT.

>> THAT'S WHY I SAY IT'S WITH THAT.

>> THAT'S WHY I SAY IT'S CULTURAL FOR THE RACIAL TO A >> THAT'S WHY I SAY IT'S CULTURAL FOR THE RACIAL TO A CERTAIN EXTENT BECAUSE OF THAT.

CULTURAL FOR THE RACIAL TO A CERTAIN EXTENT BECAUSE OF THAT.

THAT'S JUST A CULTURE THING THAT CERTAIN EXTENT BECAUSE OF THAT.

THAT'S JUST A CULTURE THING THAT FAMILIES TEND TO QUESTION WHO THAT'S JUST A CULTURE THING THAT FAMILIES TEND TO QUESTION WHO YOU'RE DATING AND YOU'RE DATING FAMILIES TEND TO QUESTION WHO YOU'RE DATING AND YOU'RE DATING CHOICES THAT THIS PERSON IS YOU'RE DATING AND YOU'RE DATING CHOICES THAT THIS PERSON IS GOING TO BECOME A MEMBER OF CHOICES THAT THIS PERSON IS GOING TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THEIR FAMILY SO THEY'RE VERY GOING TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THEIR FAMILY SO THEY'RE VERY INTERESTED IN THAT.

THEIR FAMILY SO THEY'RE VERY INTERESTED IN THAT.

I THINK THAT REGARDLESS OF RACE, INTERESTED IN THAT.

I THINK THAT REGARDLESS OF RACE, FAMILIES CAN BE A BARRIER TO I THINK THAT REGARDLESS OF RACE, FAMILIES CAN BE A BARRIER TO GETTING MARRIED -- FAMILIES CAN BE A BARRIER TO GETTING MARRIED -- >> BUT THEIR CHILDREN, THIS IS GETTING MARRIED -- >> BUT THEIR CHILDREN, THIS IS STILL A -- THESE NUMBERS >> BUT THEIR CHILDREN, THIS IS STILL A -- THESE NUMBERS NOTWITHSTANDING I DON'T FIND STILL A -- THESE NUMBERS NOTWITHSTANDING I DON'T FIND THEM HUGE OR AWESOME, I'M NOT NOTWITHSTANDING I DON'T FIND THEM HUGE OR AWESOME, I'M NOT THAT SURPRISED.

THEM HUGE OR AWESOME, I'M NOT THAT SURPRISED.

THEY KNOW THAT THIS IS STILL A THAT SURPRISED.

THEY KNOW THAT THIS IS STILL A COUNTRY WHERE YOU HAVE TO THINK THEY KNOW THAT THIS IS STILL A COUNTRY WHERE YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN, HOW THEY COUNTRY WHERE YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN, HOW THEY WILL BE RAISED, AND STILL THE ABOUT THE CHILDREN, HOW THEY WILL BE RAISED, AND STILL THE SOCIETY, STILL LIVE IN CITIES WILL BE RAISED, AND STILL THE SOCIETY, STILL LIVE IN CITIES THAT ARE INCREASINGLY RACIALLY SOCIETY, STILL LIVE IN CITIES THAT ARE INCREASINGLY RACIALLY AND SUBURBS THAT ARE THAT ARE INCREASINGLY RACIALLY AND SUBURBS THAT ARE INCREASINGLY RACIALLY THE SAME.

AND SUBURBS THAT ARE INCREASINGLY RACIALLY THE SAME.

THESE THINGS NEED TO BE THOUGHT INCREASINGLY RACIALLY THE SAME.

THESE THINGS NEED TO BE THOUGHT THROUGH BEFORE YOU GET MARRIED.

THESE THINGS NEED TO BE THOUGHT THROUGH BEFORE YOU GET MARRIED.

>> THE ALL RIGHT.

THROUGH BEFORE YOU GET MARRIED.

>> THE ALL RIGHT.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: MANY >> THE ALL RIGHT.

BEHIND THE HEADLINES: MANY AMERICANS ARE ALREADY FOCUSED ON BEHIND THE HEADLINES: MANY AMERICANS ARE ALREADY FOCUSED ON THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE.

AMERICANS ARE ALREADY FOCUSED ON THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE.

SO IS POLITICAL ACTION THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL RACE.

SO IS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, EMILY'S LIST.

SO IS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, EMILY'S LIST.

LAUNCHING THE MADAM PRESIDENT COMMITTEE, EMILY'S LIST.

LAUNCHING THE MADAM PRESIDENT CAMPAIGN, IT HOPES 2016 WILL BE LAUNCHING THE MADAM PRESIDENT CAMPAIGN, IT HOPES 2016 WILL BE THE YEAR A WOMAN FINALLY LANDS CAMPAIGN, IT HOPES 2016 WILL BE THE YEAR A WOMAN FINALLY LANDS IN THE OVAL OFFICE.

THE YEAR A WOMAN FINALLY LANDS IN THE OVAL OFFICE.

FOR 28 YEARS, EMILY'S LIST HAS IN THE OVAL OFFICE.

FOR 28 YEARS, EMILY'S LIST HAS BACKED DEMOCRATIC, PRO-CHOICE FOR 28 YEARS, EMILY'S LIST HAS BACKED DEMOCRATIC, PRO-CHOICE WOMEN RUNNING FOR OFFICE.

BACKED DEMOCRATIC, PRO-CHOICE WOMEN RUNNING FOR OFFICE.

NOW IT WANTS A WOMAN TO WIN THE WOMEN RUNNING FOR OFFICE.

NOW IT WANTS A WOMAN TO WIN THE HIGHEST U.S.

POLITICAL OFFICE, NOW IT WANTS A WOMAN TO WIN THE HIGHEST U.S.

POLITICAL OFFICE, THE PRESIDENCY.

HIGHEST U.S.

POLITICAL OFFICE, THE PRESIDENCY.

>> WE FELT REALLY STRONGLY THAT THE PRESIDENCY.

>> WE FELT REALLY STRONGLY THAT IT WAS TIME TO REALLY INITIATE A >> WE FELT REALLY STRONGLY THAT IT WAS TIME TO REALLY INITIATE A CONVERSATION ACROSS THE COUNTRY IT WAS TIME TO REALLY INITIATE A CONVERSATION ACROSS THE COUNTRY ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF WOMEN'S CONVERSATION ACROSS THE COUNTRY ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF WOMEN'S EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP, MAYORS, ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF WOMEN'S EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP, MAYORS, GOVERNORS, AND ULTIMATELY THE EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP, MAYORS, GOVERNORS, AND ULTIMATELY THE WHITE HOUSE.

GOVERNORS, AND ULTIMATELY THE WHITE HOUSE.

HIGHLIGHT THE AMAZING WOMEN WE WHITE HOUSE.

HIGHLIGHT THE AMAZING WOMEN WE HAVE IN THE PIPELINE NOW AND THE HIGHLIGHT THE AMAZING WOMEN WE HAVE IN THE PIPELINE NOW AND THE WOMEN THAT WE CONTINUE TO MOVE HAVE IN THE PIPELINE NOW AND THE WOMEN THAT WE CONTINUE TO MOVE THROUGH THE PIPELINE WHO WE WILL WOMEN THAT WE CONTINUE TO MOVE THROUGH THE PIPELINE WHO WE WILL SEE IN DECADES TO COME.

THROUGH THE PIPELINE WHO WE WILL SEE IN DECADES TO COME.

>> THE AMERICAN PUBLIC SEEMS SEE IN DECADES TO COME.

>> THE AMERICAN PUBLIC SEEMS POISED TO TRUST A WOMAN IN THE >> THE AMERICAN PUBLIC SEEMS POISED TO TRUST A WOMAN IN THE HIGHEST LEADERSHIP POSITION.

POISED TO TRUST A WOMAN IN THE HIGHEST LEADERSHIP POSITION.

A RECENT POLL OF BATTLEGROUND HIGHEST LEADERSHIP POSITION.

A RECENT POLL OF BATTLEGROUND STATES FOUND 90% OF VOTERS WOULD A RECENT POLL OF BATTLEGROUND STATES FOUND 90% OF VOTERS WOULD CONSIDER VOTING FOR A QUALIFIED STATES FOUND 90% OF VOTERS WOULD CONSIDER VOTING FOR A QUALIFIED FEMALE CANDIDATE FROM THEIR CONSIDER VOTING FOR A QUALIFIED FEMALE CANDIDATE FROM THEIR PARTY, 86% BELIEVE THE COUNTRY FEMALE CANDIDATE FROM THEIR PARTY, 86% BELIEVE THE COUNTRY IS READY TO ELECT A WOMAN PARTY, 86% BELIEVE THE COUNTRY IS READY TO ELECT A WOMAN PRESIDENT.

IS READY TO ELECT A WOMAN PRESIDENT.

AND NEARLY THREE-QUARTERS PRESIDENT.

AND NEARLY THREE-QUARTERS BELIEVE IT'S LIKELY AMERICA WILL AND NEARLY THREE-QUARTERS BELIEVE IT'S LIKELY AMERICA WILL ELECT A WOMAN PRESIDENT IN 2016.

BELIEVE IT'S LIKELY AMERICA WILL ELECT A WOMAN PRESIDENT IN 2016.

>> AMERICANS, ACROSS THE BOARD ELECT A WOMAN PRESIDENT IN 2016.

>> AMERICANS, ACROSS THE BOARD FEEL THAT WOMEN EXECUTIVES, >> AMERICANS, ACROSS THE BOARD FEEL THAT WOMEN EXECUTIVES, WOMEN LEADERS BRING THE RIGHT FEEL THAT WOMEN EXECUTIVES, WOMEN LEADERS BRING THE RIGHT PRIORITIES AND THE RIGHT WOMEN LEADERS BRING THE RIGHT PRIORITIES AND THE RIGHT JUDGMENTS TO OFFICE AND THAT PRIORITIES AND THE RIGHT JUDGMENTS TO OFFICE AND THAT THEY WILL PUT FAMILY CONCERN AND JUDGMENTS TO OFFICE AND THAT THEY WILL PUT FAMILY CONCERN AND THE NATION'S CONCERNS IN FRONT THEY WILL PUT FAMILY CONCERN AND THE NATION'S CONCERNS IN FRONT OF PARTISAN POLITICS.

THE NATION'S CONCERNS IN FRONT OF PARTISAN POLITICS.

>> SCHRIOCK SAYS SOCIAL MEDIA IS OF PARTISAN POLITICS.

>> SCHRIOCK SAYS SOCIAL MEDIA IS A POWERFUL TOOL FOR WOMEN >> SCHRIOCK SAYS SOCIAL MEDIA IS A POWERFUL TOOL FOR WOMEN CANDIDATES.

A POWERFUL TOOL FOR WOMEN CANDIDATES.

IT'S A GREAT WAY TO RAISE THEIR CANDIDATES.

IT'S A GREAT WAY TO RAISE THEIR PROFILES AND TO RAISE MONEY.

IT'S A GREAT WAY TO RAISE THEIR PROFILES AND TO RAISE MONEY.

>> THAT INCREDIBLE WOMAN THAT PROFILES AND TO RAISE MONEY.

>> THAT INCREDIBLE WOMAN THAT WHO IS RUNNING FOR THE UNITED >> THAT INCREDIBLE WOMAN THAT WHO IS RUNNING FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE THAT YOU MAY NOT WHO IS RUNNING FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE THAT YOU MAY NOT KNOW YET, BUT I DO AND I AM STATES SENATE THAT YOU MAY NOT KNOW YET, BUT I DO AND I AM GOING TO PUT IT ON FACEBOOK AND KNOW YET, BUT I DO AND I AM GOING TO PUT IT ON FACEBOOK AND I AM JUST ASKING FOR YOU TO GIVE GOING TO PUT IT ON FACEBOOK AND I AM JUST ASKING FOR YOU TO GIVE $5, $25, IF YOU HAVE $100 PUT IT I AM JUST ASKING FOR YOU TO GIVE $5, $25, IF YOU HAVE $100 PUT IT ON THE CREDIT CARD.

$5, $25, IF YOU HAVE $100 PUT IT ON THE CREDIT CARD.

THAT REALLY IS THE MOVEMENT OF ON THE CREDIT CARD.

THAT REALLY IS THE MOVEMENT OF EMILY'S LIST.

THAT REALLY IS THE MOVEMENT OF EMILY'S LIST.

WOMEN AND MEN WHO ARE COMING EMILY'S LIST.

WOMEN AND MEN WHO ARE COMING TOGETHER TO FINANCIALLY SUPPORT WOMEN AND MEN WHO ARE COMING TOGETHER TO FINANCIALLY SUPPORT WOMEN CANDIDATES ACROSS THE TOGETHER TO FINANCIALLY SUPPORT WOMEN CANDIDATES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

WOMEN CANDIDATES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

>> SO, DOES EMILY'S LIST HAVE A COUNTRY.

>> SO, DOES EMILY'S LIST HAVE A TOP PICK TO FOR THE FIRST MADAM >> SO, DOES EMILY'S LIST HAVE A TOP PICK TO FOR THE FIRST MADAM PRESIDENT?

TOP PICK TO FOR THE FIRST MADAM PRESIDENT?

SCHRIOCK SAYS HILLARY CLINTON PRESIDENT?

SCHRIOCK SAYS HILLARY CLINTON CONTINUES TO BE THE FAVORITE, SCHRIOCK SAYS HILLARY CLINTON CONTINUES TO BE THE FAVORITE, BUT NOT THE ONLY WOMAN WHO COULD CONTINUES TO BE THE FAVORITE, BUT NOT THE ONLY WOMAN WHO COULD END UP IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

BUT NOT THE ONLY WOMAN WHO COULD END UP IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

>> HER BACKGROUND, CLEARLY AS A END UP IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

>> HER BACKGROUND, CLEARLY AS A BOTH A SENATOR AND SECRETARY OF >> HER BACKGROUND, CLEARLY AS A BOTH A SENATOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE, BRINGS ALL OF THAT BOTH A SENATOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE, BRINGS ALL OF THAT EXPERIENCE INTO ONE PACKAGE TO STATE, BRINGS ALL OF THAT EXPERIENCE INTO ONE PACKAGE TO MOVE FORWARD.

EXPERIENCE INTO ONE PACKAGE TO MOVE FORWARD.

SHE WOULD BE A FANTASTIC MOVE FORWARD.

SHE WOULD BE A FANTASTIC PRESIDENT IF SHE TOOK THIS ON.

SHE WOULD BE A FANTASTIC PRESIDENT IF SHE TOOK THIS ON.

BUT AS WE LOOK AT THE OTHER PRESIDENT IF SHE TOOK THIS ON.

BUT AS WE LOOK AT THE OTHER WOMEN WHO SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BUT AS WE LOOK AT THE OTHER WOMEN WHO SHOULD BE CONSIDERED LIKE SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR AND WOMEN WHO SHOULD BE CONSIDERED LIKE SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR AND SENATOR KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, THE LIKE SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR AND SENATOR KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, THE NETWORK THAT THEY BRING TO SENATOR KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, THE NETWORK THAT THEY BRING TO POLITICS, THE ENERGY, THE NETWORK THAT THEY BRING TO POLITICS, THE ENERGY, THE PASSION, IS CRITICALLY POLITICS, THE ENERGY, THE PASSION, IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT.

PASSION, IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT.

>> WHILE EMILY'S LIST EYES THE IMPORTANT.

>> WHILE EMILY'S LIST EYES THE WHITE HOUSE, PROGRESS IS STILL >> WHILE EMILY'S LIST EYES THE WHITE HOUSE, PROGRESS IS STILL NEEDED AT THE LOCAL LEVELS.

WHITE HOUSE, PROGRESS IS STILL NEEDED AT THE LOCAL LEVELS.

>> OF THE 100 LARGEST CITIES IN NEEDED AT THE LOCAL LEVELS.

>> OF THE 100 LARGEST CITIES IN THE COUNTRY, UNTIL RECENTLY, >> OF THE 100 LARGEST CITIES IN THE COUNTRY, UNTIL RECENTLY, ONLY NINE HAD WOMEN MAYORS.

THE COUNTRY, UNTIL RECENTLY, ONLY NINE HAD WOMEN MAYORS.

WE ARE ACTUALLY IN A BETTER ONLY NINE HAD WOMEN MAYORS.

WE ARE ACTUALLY IN A BETTER POSITION IN CONGRESS, WITH WOMEN WE ARE ACTUALLY IN A BETTER POSITION IN CONGRESS, WITH WOMEN BEING 19%, THAN WE ARE BY FAR IN POSITION IN CONGRESS, WITH WOMEN BEING 19%, THAN WE ARE BY FAR IN MAYORSHIPS OF THE LARGEST CITIES BEING 19%, THAN WE ARE BY FAR IN MAYORSHIPS OF THE LARGEST CITIES IN THE COUNTRY.

MAYORSHIPS OF THE LARGEST CITIES IN THE COUNTRY.

>> AND WITH WOMEN'S ISSUES IN THE COUNTRY.

>> AND WITH WOMEN'S ISSUES DOMINATING HEADLINES IN STATE >> AND WITH WOMEN'S ISSUES DOMINATING HEADLINES IN STATE HOUSES ACROSS THE COUNTRY, DOMINATING HEADLINES IN STATE HOUSES ACROSS THE COUNTRY, SCHRIOCK SAYS EMILY'S LIST CAN'T HOUSES ACROSS THE COUNTRY, SCHRIOCK SAYS EMILY'S LIST CAN'T AFFORD TO IGNORE THE STATE SCHRIOCK SAYS EMILY'S LIST CAN'T AFFORD TO IGNORE THE STATE LEGISLATURES.

AFFORD TO IGNORE THE STATE LEGISLATURES.

>> WE ARE LOSING GROUND ON SO LEGISLATURES.

>> WE ARE LOSING GROUND ON SO MANY ISSUES, PARTICULARLY >> WE ARE LOSING GROUND ON SO MANY ISSUES, PARTICULARLY REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, BUT IF YOU MANY ISSUES, PARTICULARLY REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, BUT IF YOU LOOK AT ECONOMIC, EDUCATION, SO REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, BUT IF YOU LOOK AT ECONOMIC, EDUCATION, SO MANY DIFFERENT AREAS, THESE LOOK AT ECONOMIC, EDUCATION, SO MANY DIFFERENT AREAS, THESE STATE LEGISLATORS ARE REALLY MANY DIFFERENT AREAS, THESE STATE LEGISLATORS ARE REALLY PUSHING THROUGH SOME INCREDIBLY STATE LEGISLATORS ARE REALLY PUSHING THROUGH SOME INCREDIBLY BACKWARDS LOOKING LEGISLATIONS PUSHING THROUGH SOME INCREDIBLY BACKWARDS LOOKING LEGISLATIONS THAT ARE NOW LAWS.

BACKWARDS LOOKING LEGISLATIONS THAT ARE NOW LAWS.

AND IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE THAT ARE NOW LAWS.

AND IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE VERY FOCUSED ON AND WE ARE AND IT IS SOMETHING THAT WE ARE VERY FOCUSED ON AND WE ARE ACTUALLY DOUBLING DOWN ON OUR VERY FOCUSED ON AND WE ARE ACTUALLY DOUBLING DOWN ON OUR PROGRAM TO TRAIN, RECRUIT AND ACTUALLY DOUBLING DOWN ON OUR PROGRAM TO TRAIN, RECRUIT AND GET WOMEN INTO THESE PROGRAM TO TRAIN, RECRUIT AND GET WOMEN INTO THESE LEGISLATORS.

GET WOMEN INTO THESE LEGISLATORS.

>> IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE COMING LEGISLATORS.

>> IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE COMING UP THROUGH THE RANKS, SHE TALKED >> IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE COMING UP THROUGH THE RANKS, SHE TALKED ABOUT AMY KLOBUCHAR, OR UP THROUGH THE RANKS, SHE TALKED ABOUT AMY KLOBUCHAR, OR GILLIBRAND BUT DOES A WOMAN IN ABOUT AMY KLOBUCHAR, OR GILLIBRAND BUT DOES A WOMAN IN THE 2016 ON DEMOCRATIC START GILLIBRAND BUT DOES A WOMAN IN THE 2016 ON DEMOCRATIC START LET'S START WITH, MEAN HILLARY THE 2016 ON DEMOCRATIC START LET'S START WITH, MEAN HILLARY CLINTON?

LET'S START WITH, MEAN HILLARY CLINTON?

>> DOESN'T NECESSARILY.

CLINTON?

>> DOESN'T NECESSARILY.

I THINK HILLARY CLINTON PROBABLY >> DOESN'T NECESSARILY.

I THINK HILLARY CLINTON PROBABLY HAS THE BEST RESUME FOR IT.

I THINK HILLARY CLINTON PROBABLY HAS THE BEST RESUME FOR IT.

WE'VE HEARD A LOT ABOUT CHERYL HAS THE BEST RESUME FOR IT.

WE'VE HEARD A LOT ABOUT CHERYL SANDBERG TALKING ABOUT LEANING WE'VE HEARD A LOT ABOUT CHERYL SANDBERG TALKING ABOUT LEANING IN.

SANDBERG TALKING ABOUT LEANING IN.

WHAT I LOVE ABOUT EMILY'S LIST IN.

WHAT I LOVE ABOUT EMILY'S LIST WHAT WE NEED IS WOMEN TO HAVE WHAT I LOVE ABOUT EMILY'S LIST WHAT WE NEED IS WOMEN TO HAVE EACH OTHER'S BACKS.

WHAT WE NEED IS WOMEN TO HAVE EACH OTHER'S BACKS.

JUST LOOK WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH EACH OTHER'S BACKS.

JUST LOOK WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH JANET YELLEN THE SUCCESSION OF JUST LOOK WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH JANET YELLEN THE SUCCESSION OF BEN BERNANKE AT THE FED.

JANET YELLEN THE SUCCESSION OF BEN BERNANKE AT THE FED.

AND SUDDENLY YOU THINK THE VICE BEN BERNANKE AT THE FED.

AND SUDDENLY YOU THINK THE VICE CHAIR WOULD BE VERY SERIOUSLY AND SUDDENLY YOU THINK THE VICE CHAIR WOULD BE VERY SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED CANDIDATE.

CHAIR WOULD BE VERY SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED CANDIDATE.

ALL OF A SUDDEN LARRY'S TEAM, CONSIDERED CANDIDATE.

ALL OF A SUDDEN LARRY'S TEAM, TEAM SUMMERS HAS COME OUT BEEN ALL OF A SUDDEN LARRY'S TEAM, TEAM SUMMERS HAS COME OUT BEEN PUSHING HIS POSITION.

TEAM SUMMERS HAS COME OUT BEEN PUSHING HIS POSITION.

WELL,.

PUSHING HIS POSITION.

WELL,.

>> THE REST OF THE WORLD IS WELL,.

>> THE REST OF THE WORLD IS COMING OUT AGAINST HIM INCLUDING >> THE REST OF THE WORLD IS COMING OUT AGAINST HIM INCLUDING -- COMING OUT AGAINST HIM INCLUDING -- >> NOW THE -- -- >> NOW THE -- >> AND THE "NEW YORK TIMES."

>> NOW THE -- >> AND THE "NEW YORK TIMES."

>> NOW BECOMING TO LARRY OR NOT >> AND THE "NEW YORK TIMES."

>> NOW BECOMING TO LARRY OR NOT TO LARRY.

>> NOW BECOMING TO LARRY OR NOT TO LARRY.

I'M LIKE, WHERE'S JANET?

TO LARRY.

I'M LIKE, WHERE'S JANET?

WHO BY THE WAY WAS ENDORSED BY I'M LIKE, WHERE'S JANET?

WHO BY THE WAY WAS ENDORSED BY THE "NEW YORK TIMES."

WHO BY THE WAY WAS ENDORSED BY THE "NEW YORK TIMES."

I THINK IT'S GREAT.

THE "NEW YORK TIMES."

I THINK IT'S GREAT.

WOMEN NEED TO HAVE EACH OTHER'S I THINK IT'S GREAT.

WOMEN NEED TO HAVE EACH OTHER'S BACK, THEY NEED TO BE LIKE THE WOMEN NEED TO HAVE EACH OTHER'S BACK, THEY NEED TO BE LIKE THE GOOD OLD BOYS NETWORK AND BACK, THEY NEED TO BE LIKE THE GOOD OLD BOYS NETWORK AND SUPPORT THEM.

GOOD OLD BOYS NETWORK AND SUPPORT THEM.

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT EMILY'S LIST SUPPORT THEM.

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT EMILY'S LIST IS DOING.

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT EMILY'S LIST IS DOING.

AND I THINK IT WOULD BE A IS DOING.

AND I THINK IT WOULD BE A SURPRISE IF A WOMAN WERE NOT ON AND I THINK IT WOULD BE A SURPRISE IF A WOMAN WERE NOT ON THE CANDIDATE -- ON THE SLATE ON SURPRISE IF A WOMAN WERE NOT ON THE CANDIDATE -- ON THE SLATE ON DEMOCRATIC SIDE.

THE CANDIDATE -- ON THE SLATE ON DEMOCRATIC SIDE.

>> ON THE REPUBLICAN SIDE.

DEMOCRATIC SIDE.

>> ON THE REPUBLICAN SIDE.

>> I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO BE >> ON THE REPUBLICAN SIDE.

>> I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO BE REPUBLICAN WOMEN RUNNING 2016.

>> I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO BE REPUBLICAN WOMEN RUNNING 2016.

I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY DOUBT REPUBLICAN WOMEN RUNNING 2016.

I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY DOUBT ABOUT THAT.

I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY DOUBT ABOUT THAT.

IT'S MUCH CLEAR WHO THE ABOUT THAT.

IT'S MUCH CLEAR WHO THE DEMOCRATS ARE PROBABLY GOING TO IT'S MUCH CLEAR WHO THE DEMOCRATS ARE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE IN 2016 IF A WOMEN IS GOING DEMOCRATS ARE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE IN 2016 IF A WOMEN IS GOING TO BE IT IT'S GOING TO LIKELY BE HAVE IN 2016 IF A WOMEN IS GOING TO BE IT IT'S GOING TO LIKELY BE HILLARY.

TO BE IT IT'S GOING TO LIKELY BE HILLARY.

LET ME GIVE A PLUG FOR ANOTHER HILLARY.

LET ME GIVE A PLUG FOR ANOTHER GROUP THAT DOES STUFF LIKE THIS, LET ME GIVE A PLUG FOR ANOTHER GROUP THAT DOES STUFF LIKE THIS, A GROUP CALLED THE SUSAN B.

GROUP THAT DOES STUFF LIKE THIS, A GROUP CALLED THE SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST WHICH TRIES TO A GROUP CALLED THE SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST WHICH TRIES TO IDENTIFY CONSERVATIVE FEMALE ANTHONY LIST WHICH TRIES TO IDENTIFY CONSERVATIVE FEMALE CANDIDATES WHO ARE PRO LIFE IDENTIFY CONSERVATIVE FEMALE CANDIDATES WHO ARE PRO LIFE EXACTLY WHAT EMILY'S LIST WHAT CANDIDATES WHO ARE PRO LIFE EXACTLY WHAT EMILY'S LIST WHAT DOES THEY DO.

EXACTLY WHAT EMILY'S LIST WHAT DOES THEY DO.

THEY RECRUIT ACROSS THE BOARD.

DOES THEY DO.

THEY RECRUIT ACROSS THE BOARD.

STATE LEVEL, THE TOP LEVEL.

THEY RECRUIT ACROSS THE BOARD.

STATE LEVEL, THE TOP LEVEL.

BUT IT'S NOT JUST OUTSIDE STATE LEVEL, THE TOP LEVEL.

BUT IT'S NOT JUST OUTSIDE GROUPS, THE PARTIES ARE DOING BUT IT'S NOT JUST OUTSIDE GROUPS, THE PARTIES ARE DOING THIS, REPUBLICAN PARTY IS DOING GROUPS, THE PARTIES ARE DOING THIS, REPUBLICAN PARTY IS DOING A LOT IN TERMS OF BOTH AT THE THIS, REPUBLICAN PARTY IS DOING A LOT IN TERMS OF BOTH AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL AND STATE LEVEL A LOT IN TERMS OF BOTH AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL AND STATE LEVEL WHICH IS REALLY YOUR FARM TEAMS.

FEDERAL LEVEL AND STATE LEVEL WHICH IS REALLY YOUR FARM TEAMS.

THIS IS WHERE YOU GET PEOPLE WHICH IS REALLY YOUR FARM TEAMS.

THIS IS WHERE YOU GET PEOPLE THAT EVENTUALLY BECOME SENATORS, THIS IS WHERE YOU GET PEOPLE THAT EVENTUALLY BECOME SENATORS, THAT BECOME GOVERNORS AND THE THAT EVENTUALLY BECOME SENATORS, THAT BECOME GOVERNORS AND THE LIKE.

THAT BECOME GOVERNORS AND THE LIKE.

THE GOAL OF RECRUITING 300 OVER LIKE.

THE GOAL OF RECRUITING 300 OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT ELECTION THE GOAL OF RECRUITING 300 OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT ELECTION PSYCH YES.

THE COURSE OF THE NEXT ELECTION PSYCH YES.

>> YOU LOOK AT ALTERNATIVES TO PSYCH YES.

>> YOU LOOK AT ALTERNATIVES TO HILLARY CLINTON ON THE >> YOU LOOK AT ALTERNATIVES TO HILLARY CLINTON ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE AND MOST ARE HILLARY CLINTON ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE AND MOST ARE WHITE, YOU LOOK TO POSSIBLE DEMOCRATIC SIDE AND MOST ARE WHITE, YOU LOOK TO POSSIBLE FEMALES, SARAH PALIN NOT GOING WHITE, YOU LOOK TO POSSIBLE FEMALES, SARAH PALIN NOT GOING TO -- OKAY.

FEMALES, SARAH PALIN NOT GOING TO -- OKAY.

THEN YOU WERE MENTIONING TO -- OKAY.

THEN YOU WERE MENTIONING GOVERNOR SUZANNE A MARTINEZ OUT THEN YOU WERE MENTIONING GOVERNOR SUZANNE A MARTINEZ OUT OF NEW MEXICO WHO IS VERY GOOD.

GOVERNOR SUZANNE A MARTINEZ OUT OF NEW MEXICO WHO IS VERY GOOD.

AND ANNOUNCED THAT SHE'S RUNNING OF NEW MEXICO WHO IS VERY GOOD.

AND ANNOUNCED THAT SHE'S RUNNING AGAIN IN SOUTH CAROLINA AND HAD AND ANNOUNCED THAT SHE'S RUNNING AGAIN IN SOUTH CAROLINA AND HAD LOT OF BIG NATIONAL NAMES AGAIN IN SOUTH CAROLINA AND HAD LOT OF BIG NATIONAL NAMES STANDING NEXT TO HER.

LOT OF BIG NATIONAL NAMES STANDING NEXT TO HER.

THAT WAS INTERESTING.

STANDING NEXT TO HER.

THAT WAS INTERESTING.

YOU WERE MENTIONING KELLY FROM THAT WAS INTERESTING.

YOU WERE MENTIONING KELLY FROM NEW HAMPSHIRE.

YOU WERE MENTIONING KELLY FROM NEW HAMPSHIRE.

THERE ARE LOT OF WOMEN I THINK NEW HAMPSHIRE.

THERE ARE LOT OF WOMEN I THINK IN THE PARTY WHO ARE AT THE THERE ARE LOT OF WOMEN I THINK IN THE PARTY WHO ARE AT THE RIGHT STATURE LEVEL IN TERMS OF IN THE PARTY WHO ARE AT THE RIGHT STATURE LEVEL IN TERMS OF EXPERIENCE, NOT JUST IN ELECTED RIGHT STATURE LEVEL IN TERMS OF EXPERIENCE, NOT JUST IN ELECTED OFFICE BUT FORMER JOBS AS WELL EXPERIENCE, NOT JUST IN ELECTED OFFICE BUT FORMER JOBS AS WELL THAT I THINK ARE READY FOR THOSE OFFICE BUT FORMER JOBS AS WELL THAT I THINK ARE READY FOR THOSE RUNS IF THEY WANT TO MAKE THEM.

THAT I THINK ARE READY FOR THOSE RUNS IF THEY WANT TO MAKE THEM.

>> DOESN'T HAVE THE STRONGEST RUNS IF THEY WANT TO MAKE THEM.

>> DOESN'T HAVE THE STRONGEST BENCH.

>> DOESN'T HAVE THE STRONGEST BENCH.

UNTIL THEY GET POLICIES THAT BENCH.

UNTIL THEY GET POLICIES THAT WILL ATTRACT MORE WOMEN THEY ARE UNTIL THEY GET POLICIES THAT WILL ATTRACT MORE WOMEN THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE THAT WEAK BENCH.

WILL ATTRACT MORE WOMEN THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE THAT WEAK BENCH.

OUR BENCH -- GOING TO HAVE THAT WEAK BENCH.

OUR BENCH -- >> WHAT ABOUT THE FACT THAT SHE OUR BENCH -- >> WHAT ABOUT THE FACT THAT SHE MENTIONED TWO WOMEN OF COLOR AS >> WHAT ABOUT THE FACT THAT SHE MENTIONED TWO WOMEN OF COLOR AS SORT OF THE TWO MORE PROMINENT MENTIONED TWO WOMEN OF COLOR AS SORT OF THE TWO MORE PROMINENT REPUBLICAN WOMEN WHO MIGHT GO SORT OF THE TWO MORE PROMINENT REPUBLICAN WOMEN WHO MIGHT GO THROUGH THE NOMINATION VERSUS -- REPUBLICAN WOMEN WHO MIGHT GO THROUGH THE NOMINATION VERSUS -- IT'S INTERESTING TO ME THAT -- THROUGH THE NOMINATION VERSUS -- IT'S INTERESTING TO ME THAT -- >> THAT'S NOT WHAT REPUBLICANS IT'S INTERESTING TO ME THAT -- >> THAT'S NOT WHAT REPUBLICANS ARE TALKING ABOUT.

>> THAT'S NOT WHAT REPUBLICANS ARE TALKING ABOUT.

I BELIEVE THAT THE WOMEN THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.

I BELIEVE THAT THE WOMEN THAT WE NAMED TEND TO BE SENATORS I BELIEVE THAT THE WOMEN THAT WE NAMED TEND TO BE SENATORS BECAUSE EVERY SENATOR BELIEVES NAMED TEND TO BE SENATORS BECAUSE EVERY SENATOR BELIEVES THAT SHE CAN BE THE PRESIDENT OF BECAUSE EVERY SENATOR BELIEVES THAT SHE CAN BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

THAT SHE CAN BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

BUT BEYOND THAT I REALLY DON'T THE UNITED STATES.

BUT BEYOND THAT I REALLY DON'T SEE A WOMAN EVEN ON THE BUT BEYOND THAT I REALLY DON'T SEE A WOMAN EVEN ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE THAT WOULD BE A SEE A WOMAN EVEN ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE THAT WOULD BE A TRUE CONTENDER OF THE KIND WE DEMOCRATIC SIDE THAT WOULD BE A TRUE CONTENDER OF THE KIND WE ARE USED TO.

TRUE CONTENDER OF THE KIND WE ARE USED TO.

AND IT'S BECAUSE, LOOK AT THOSE ARE USED TO.

AND IT'S BECAUSE, LOOK AT THOSE WOMEN.

AND IT'S BECAUSE, LOOK AT THOSE WOMEN.

ALMOST ALL OF THEM ARE FAIRLY WOMEN.

ALMOST ALL OF THEM ARE FAIRLY NEW.

ALMOST ALL OF THEM ARE FAIRLY NEW.

ONE, MAYBE TWO TERMS.

NEW.

ONE, MAYBE TWO TERMS.

NOBODY KNOWS THEIR NAME EXCEPT ONE, MAYBE TWO TERMS.

NOBODY KNOWS THEIR NAME EXCEPT US AND THE PEOPLE IN THEIR NOBODY KNOWS THEIR NAME EXCEPT US AND THE PEOPLE IN THEIR STATE.

US AND THE PEOPLE IN THEIR STATE.

AND I CAN'T SAY ENOUGH ABOUT HOW STATE.

AND I CAN'T SAY ENOUGH ABOUT HOW IMPORTANT THAT IS IF YOU WANT TO AND I CAN'T SAY ENOUGH ABOUT HOW IMPORTANT THAT IS IF YOU WANT TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

IMPORTANT THAT IS IF YOU WANT TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

IF YOU WANT TO BE A DARK HORSE RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

IF YOU WANT TO BE A DARK HORSE THERE ARE WOMEN ON BOTH SIDES.

IF YOU WANT TO BE A DARK HORSE THERE ARE WOMEN ON BOTH SIDES.

>> YOU KNOW THIS IS WHY THIS THERE ARE WOMEN ON BOTH SIDES.

>> YOU KNOW THIS IS WHY THIS THING IS SO GOOD.

>> YOU KNOW THIS IS WHY THIS THING IS SO GOOD.

THEY DID A TOWN HALL MEETING IN THING IS SO GOOD.

THEY DID A TOWN HALL MEETING IN IOWA, THEY DID A TOWN HALL THEY DID A TOWN HALL MEETING IN IOWA, THEY DID A TOWN HALL MEETING IN NEW HAMPSHIRE.

IOWA, THEY DID A TOWN HALL MEETING IN NEW HAMPSHIRE.

THEY'RE INTRODUCING THESE WOMEN MEETING IN NEW HAMPSHIRE.

THEY'RE INTRODUCING THESE WOMEN IN VERY CRITICAL PLACES AND IF THEY'RE INTRODUCING THESE WOMEN IN VERY CRITICAL PLACES AND IF YOU THINK OF IT BARACK OBAMA HAD IN VERY CRITICAL PLACES AND IF YOU THINK OF IT BARACK OBAMA HAD BEEN A STATE -- YOU THINK OF IT BARACK OBAMA HAD BEEN A STATE -- >> NOBODY KNEW WHO HE WAS.

BEEN A STATE -- >> NOBODY KNEW WHO HE WAS.

>> IN HIS FIRST TERM.

>> NOBODY KNEW WHO HE WAS.

>> IN HIS FIRST TERM.

DID ANYONE SAY HOW DARE YOU >> IN HIS FIRST TERM.

DID ANYONE SAY HOW DARE YOU THINK YOU CAN BE PRESIDENT -- DID ANYONE SAY HOW DARE YOU THINK YOU CAN BE PRESIDENT -- >> HILLARY DID.

THINK YOU CAN BE PRESIDENT -- >> HILLARY DID.

[LAUGHTER] >> HILLARY DID.

[LAUGHTER] >> THESE GUYS THEY THINK -- [LAUGHTER] >> THESE GUYS THEY THINK -- MINUTE THEY'RE ELECTED SENATOR >> THESE GUYS THEY THINK -- MINUTE THEY'RE ELECTED SENATOR THEY THINK I'M RUNNING FOR THE MINUTE THEY'RE ELECTED SENATOR THEY THINK I'M RUNNING FOR THE WHITE HOUSE.

THEY THINK I'M RUNNING FOR THE WHITE HOUSE.

>> I'LL BE ON E OUR BENCH OF WHITE HOUSE.

>> I'LL BE ON E OUR BENCH OF WOMEN I AGREE WITH YOU IS NOT AS >> I'LL BE ON E OUR BENCH OF WOMEN I AGREE WITH YOU IS NOT AS STRONG AS ON THE DEMOCRATIC WOMEN I AGREE WITH YOU IS NOT AS STRONG AS ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE.

STRONG AS ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE.

BUT THERE ARE REASONS FOR THAT, SIDE.

BUT THERE ARE REASONS FOR THAT, AND PART OF THAT IS BECAUSE THE BUT THERE ARE REASONS FOR THAT, AND PART OF THAT IS BECAUSE THE PARTY PREVIOUSLY DONE NOT A AND PART OF THAT IS BECAUSE THE PARTY PREVIOUSLY DONE NOT A GREAT JOB AT RECRUITING WOMEN PARTY PREVIOUSLY DONE NOT A GREAT JOB AT RECRUITING WOMEN AND CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATIONS GREAT JOB AT RECRUITING WOMEN AND CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATIONS NOT DONE VERY GOOD JOB OF AND CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATIONS NOT DONE VERY GOOD JOB OF RECRUITING WOMEN.

NOT DONE VERY GOOD JOB OF RECRUITING WOMEN.

AS YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT BEFORE RECRUITING WOMEN.

AS YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT BEFORE THE NATIONAL PARTY FOR A FACT IS AS YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT BEFORE THE NATIONAL PARTY FOR A FACT IS GOING OUT OF ITS WAY TO PARTNER THE NATIONAL PARTY FOR A FACT IS GOING OUT OF ITS WAY TO PARTNER WITH ORGANIZATIONS AND RECRUIT GOING OUT OF ITS WAY TO PARTNER WITH ORGANIZATIONS AND RECRUIT MORE WOMEN FOR THE LOWER -- WITH ORGANIZATIONS AND RECRUIT MORE WOMEN FOR THE LOWER -- >> WE ARE OUT OF TIME.

MORE WOMEN FOR THE LOWER -- >> WE ARE OUT OF TIME.

THANK YOU.

>> WE ARE OUT OF TIME.

THANK YOU.

THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION OF THANK YOU.

THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION OF "TO THE CONTRARY."

THAT'S IT FOR THIS EDITION OF "TO THE CONTRARY."

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER "TO THE CONTRARY."

PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE AND @TOTHECONTRARY PLEASE FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER @BONNIEERBE AND @TOTHECONTRARY AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

@BONNIEERBE AND @TOTHECONTRARY AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY WHERE THE DISCUSSION CONTINUES.

PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY WHERE THE DISCUSSION CONTINUES.

WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, TO WHERE THE DISCUSSION CONTINUES.

WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, TO THE CONTRARY, PLEASE JOIN US WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK, TO THE CONTRARY, PLEASE JOIN US NEXT TIME.

FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN ONLINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE FOR A TRANSCRIPT OR TO SEE AN ONLINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE OF "TO THE CONTRARY" PLEASE ONLINE VERSION OF THIS EPISODE OF "TO THE CONTRARY" PLEASE VISIT OUR PBS WEBSITE AT OF "TO THE CONTRARY" PLEASE VISIT OUR PBS WEBSITE AT WWW.PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.