[ ] >> A STATE COURT SETS EXECUTION DATES FOR SIX OKLAHOMA DEATH ROW >> A STATE COURT SETS EXECUTION DATES FOR SIX OKLAHOMA DEATH ROW INMATES.

DATES FOR SIX OKLAHOMA DEATH ROW INMATES.

>> THERE ARE LIVES THAT WERE INMATES.

>> THERE ARE LIVES THAT WERE DESTROYED OR DAMAGED.

>> THERE ARE LIVES THAT WERE DESTROYED OR DAMAGED.

>> THE GOVERNOR VOWS TO SUPPORT DESTROYED OR DAMAGED.

>> THE GOVERNOR VOWS TO SUPPORT NEW MOTHERS AND BABIES FOLLOWING >> THE GOVERNOR VOWS TO SUPPORT NEW MOTHERS AND BABIES FOLLOWING THE DEMISE OF ROE V. WADE.

NEW MOTHERS AND BABIES FOLLOWING THE DEMISE OF ROE V. WADE.

HOW WILL THAT BE ACCOMPLISHED?

THE DEMISE OF ROE V. WADE.

HOW WILL THAT BE ACCOMPLISHED?

>> SO FAR IT'S BEEN ADEQUATE.

HOW WILL THAT BE ACCOMPLISHED?

>> SO FAR IT'S BEEN ADEQUATE.

>> A LOOK AT HOW OTHER >> SO FAR IT'S BEEN ADEQUATE.

>> A LOOK AT HOW OTHER CONTENTIOUS SUPREME COURT >> A LOOK AT HOW OTHER CONTENTIOUS SUPREME COURT RULINGS COULD CHANGE LIVES IN CONTENTIOUS SUPREME COURT RULINGS COULD CHANGE LIVES IN OKLAHOMA.

RULINGS COULD CHANGE LIVES IN OKLAHOMA.

>> IT GOES TO HOW MUCH OKLAHOMA.

>> IT GOES TO HOW MUCH DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY DOES A >> IT GOES TO HOW MUCH DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY DOES A FEDERAL AGENCY HAVE TO MAKE DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY DOES A FEDERAL AGENCY HAVE TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS?

FEDERAL AGENCY HAVE TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS?

>> HOSPITAL WORKERS FACING THESE DECISIONS?

>> HOSPITAL WORKERS FACING INCREASING THREATS OF VIOLENCE >> HOSPITAL WORKERS FACING INCREASING THREATS OF VIOLENCE FROM DISGRUNTLED PATIENTS.

INCREASING THREATS OF VIOLENCE FROM DISGRUNTLED PATIENTS.

>> MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS HAD FROM DISGRUNTLED PATIENTS.

>> MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS HAD EXPERIENCED VERBAL EXPERIENCE, >> MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS HAD EXPERIENCED VERBAL EXPERIENCE, BUT 44% HAD EXPERIENCED PHYSICAL EXPERIENCED VERBAL EXPERIENCE, BUT 44% HAD EXPERIENCED PHYSICAL VIOLENCE ON THE JOB.

BUT 44% HAD EXPERIENCED PHYSICAL VIOLENCE ON THE JOB.

>> HOW VIABLE IS THE EV INDUSTRY VIOLENCE ON THE JOB.

>> HOW VIABLE IS THE EV INDUSTRY IN OKLAHOMA?

>> HOW VIABLE IS THE EV INDUSTRY IN OKLAHOMA?

>> I'M DRIVING IT FOR FREE NOW.

IN OKLAHOMA?

>> I'M DRIVING IT FOR FREE NOW.

>> THOSE STORIES PLUS OUR WEEKLY >> I'M DRIVING IT FOR FREE NOW.

>> THOSE STORIES PLUS OUR WEEKLY IN-DEPTH CONVERSATION NEXT ON >> THOSE STORIES PLUS OUR WEEKLY IN-DEPTH CONVERSATION NEXT ON "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT."

IN-DEPTH CONVERSATION NEXT ON "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT."

[ ] "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT."

[ ] >> HELLO, EVERYONE, AND WELCOME [ ] >> HELLO, EVERYONE, AND WELCOME TO THE "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS >> HELLO, EVERYONE, AND WELCOME TO THE "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT."

TO THE "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT."

I'M JASON DOYLE.

REPORT."

I'M JASON DOYLE.

RICH LENZ WILL RETURN NEXT WEEK.

I'M JASON DOYLE.

RICH LENZ WILL RETURN NEXT WEEK.

THE OKLAHOMA COURT OF CRIMINAL RICH LENZ WILL RETURN NEXT WEEK.

THE OKLAHOMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS HAS SET 25 EXECUTION THE OKLAHOMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS HAS SET 25 EXECUTION DATES FOR INMATES WHO HAVE APPEALS HAS SET 25 EXECUTION DATES FOR INMATES WHO HAVE EXHAUSTED THEIR APPEALS.

DATES FOR INMATES WHO HAVE EXHAUSTED THEIR APPEALS.

THE COURT'S DECISION WAS EXHAUSTED THEIR APPEALS.

THE COURT'S DECISION WAS HERALDED BY OUTGOING ATTORNEY THE COURT'S DECISION WAS HERALDED BY OUTGOING ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN O'CONNOR BUT NOT HERALDED BY OUTGOING ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN O'CONNOR BUT NOT EVERYONE IS PLEASED WITH THE GENERAL JOHN O'CONNOR BUT NOT EVERYONE IS PLEASED WITH THE DECISION.

EVERYONE IS PLEASED WITH THE DECISION.

TAELYR JACKSON HAS MORE ON THAT.

DECISION.

TAELYR JACKSON HAS MORE ON THAT.

>> THAT'S RIGHT.

TAELYR JACKSON HAS MORE ON THAT.

>> THAT'S RIGHT.

THIS IS NOW THE LARGEST MASS >> THAT'S RIGHT.

THIS IS NOW THE LARGEST MASS EXECUTION DATES SET.

THIS IS NOW THE LARGEST MASS EXECUTION DATES SET.

>> THE FIRST PHASE OF EXECUTIONS EXECUTION DATES SET.

>> THE FIRST PHASE OF EXECUTIONS ARE SET TO START ON AUGUST 25th >> THE FIRST PHASE OF EXECUTIONS ARE SET TO START ON AUGUST 25th AND WILL BEGIN WITH JAMES ARE SET TO START ON AUGUST 25th AND WILL BEGIN WITH JAMES CODINGTON WHO WAS CONVICTED FOR AND WILL BEGIN WITH JAMES CODINGTON WHO WAS CONVICTED FOR MURDERING A 73-YEAR-OLD MAN IN CODINGTON WHO WAS CONVICTED FOR MURDERING A 73-YEAR-OLD MAN IN 1997.

MURDERING A 73-YEAR-OLD MAN IN 1997.

FIVE OTHER INMATES WERE NAMED IN 1997.

FIVE OTHER INMATES WERE NAMED IN THE FIRST PHASE OF EXECUTIONS, FIVE OTHER INMATES WERE NAMED IN THE FIRST PHASE OF EXECUTIONS, INCLUDING RICHARD WHOSE THE FIRST PHASE OF EXECUTIONS, INCLUDING RICHARD WHOSE EXECUTION IS SET FOR SEPTEMBER INCLUDING RICHARD WHOSE EXECUTION IS SET FOR SEPTEMBER 22nd, MARKING THE FOURTH TIME HE EXECUTION IS SET FOR SEPTEMBER 22nd, MARKING THE FOURTH TIME HE HAS BEEN SET TO UNDERGO LETHAL 22nd, MARKING THE FOURTH TIME HE HAS BEEN SET TO UNDERGO LETHAL INJECTION.

HAS BEEN SET TO UNDERGO LETHAL INJECTION.

HIS LAWYER FILED AN APPLICATION INJECTION.

HIS LAWYER FILED AN APPLICATION FOR A POST-CONVICTION RELEASE A HIS LAWYER FILED AN APPLICATION FOR A POST-CONVICTION RELEASE A WEEK AGO AFTER RECENTLY FOR A POST-CONVICTION RELEASE A WEEK AGO AFTER RECENTLY INVESTIGATION WAS REQUESTED BY WEEK AGO AFTER RECENTLY INVESTIGATION WAS REQUESTED BY REPRESENTATIVE KEVIN McDOGLE AND INVESTIGATION WAS REQUESTED BY REPRESENTATIVE KEVIN McDOGLE AND A COMMITTEE.

REPRESENTATIVE KEVIN McDOGLE AND A COMMITTEE.

>> I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT WE A COMMITTEE.

>> I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT WE MIGHT HAVE AN INNOCENT MAN ON >> I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT WE MIGHT HAVE AN INNOCENT MAN ON DEATH ROW.

MIGHT HAVE AN INNOCENT MAN ON DEATH ROW.

>> Reporter: McDOGLE SAYS THE DEATH ROW.

>> Reporter: McDOGLE SAYS THE 343-PAGE REPORT REVEALED >> Reporter: McDOGLE SAYS THE 343-PAGE REPORT REVEALED ALARMING EVIDENCE.

343-PAGE REPORT REVEALED ALARMING EVIDENCE.

>> THAT DIVES INTO THE ALARMING EVIDENCE.

>> THAT DIVES INTO THE INVESTIGATION.

>> THAT DIVES INTO THE INVESTIGATION.

THEY ACTUALLY DIVE INTO THE INVESTIGATION.

THEY ACTUALLY DIVE INTO THE COURT CASE.

THEY ACTUALLY DIVE INTO THE COURT CASE.

THEY DIVE INTO THE TRANSCRIPT.

COURT CASE.

THEY DIVE INTO THE TRANSCRIPT.

>> Reporter: ATTORNEY GENERAL THEY DIVE INTO THE TRANSCRIPT.

>> Reporter: ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN O'CONNOR'S PUSH FOR THE >> Reporter: ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN O'CONNOR'S PUSH FOR THE EXECUTION DATES TO BE SET CAME JOHN O'CONNOR'S PUSH FOR THE EXECUTION DATES TO BE SET CAME AFTER THE JUNE 6th RULING BY THE EXECUTION DATES TO BE SET CAME AFTER THE JUNE 6th RULING BY THE FEDERAL JUDGE THAT DETERMINED AFTER THE JUNE 6th RULING BY THE FEDERAL JUDGE THAT DETERMINED OKLAHOMANS' THREE-DRUG LEGAL FEDERAL JUDGE THAT DETERMINED OKLAHOMANS' THREE-DRUG LEGAL INJECTION METHOD WITH US OKLAHOMANS' THREE-DRUG LEGAL INJECTION METHOD WITH US CONSTITUTIONAL.

INJECTION METHOD WITH US CONSTITUTIONAL.

>> THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S JOB IS CONSTITUTIONAL.

>> THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S JOB IS TO TELL THE COURT OF CRIMINAL >> THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S JOB IS TO TELL THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS THAT ALL THE DUE PROCESS TO TELL THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS THAT ALL THE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED.

APPEALS THAT ALL THE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED.

SO, WE SENT THOSE NOTICES OVER RIGHTS HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTED.

SO, WE SENT THOSE NOTICES OVER ONE AT A TIME ON THE 25 PEOPLE.

SO, WE SENT THOSE NOTICES OVER ONE AT A TIME ON THE 25 PEOPLE.

>> Reporter: AND WHILE O'CONNOR ONE AT A TIME ON THE 25 PEOPLE.

>> Reporter: AND WHILE O'CONNOR WORKS TO PROSECUTE DEATH ROW >> Reporter: AND WHILE O'CONNOR WORKS TO PROSECUTE DEATH ROW INMATES TO THE FULLEST EXTENT, WORKS TO PROSECUTE DEATH ROW INMATES TO THE FULLEST EXTENT, ANTIDEATH PENALTY ORGANIZATIONS INMATES TO THE FULLEST EXTENT, ANTIDEATH PENALTY ORGANIZATIONS ARE FIGHTING AGAINST IT.

ANTIDEATH PENALTY ORGANIZATIONS ARE FIGHTING AGAINST IT.

>> MY BROTHER AND I ARE FOUNDING ARE FIGHTING AGAINST IT.

>> MY BROTHER AND I ARE FOUNDING MEMBERS OF WITNESS TO INNOCENCE, >> MY BROTHER AND I ARE FOUNDING MEMBERS OF WITNESS TO INNOCENCE, WHICH IS AN ORGANIZATION OF MEMBERS OF WITNESS TO INNOCENCE, WHICH IS AN ORGANIZATION OF DEATH ROW SURVIVORS AND FAMILY WHICH IS AN ORGANIZATION OF DEATH ROW SURVIVORS AND FAMILY MEMBERS.

DEATH ROW SURVIVORS AND FAMILY MEMBERS.

>> Reporter: WITNESS TO MEMBERS.

>> Reporter: WITNESS TO INNOCENCE'S MISSION IS TO HELP >> Reporter: WITNESS TO INNOCENCE'S MISSION IS TO HELP EMPOWER EXONERATED DEATH ROW INNOCENCE'S MISSION IS TO HELP EMPOWER EXONERATED DEATH ROW SURVIVORS TO BE AN EFFECTIVE EMPOWER EXONERATED DEATH ROW SURVIVORS TO BE AN EFFECTIVE VOICE IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE SURVIVORS TO BE AN EFFECTIVE VOICE IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY.

VOICE IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY.

NANCY AND HER BROTHER JOINED THE DEATH PENALTY.

NANCY AND HER BROTHER JOINED THE FIGHT AFTER GREG WAS EXONERATED.

NANCY AND HER BROTHER JOINED THE FIGHT AFTER GREG WAS EXONERATED.

>> THIS IS A PICTURE OF MY FIGHT AFTER GREG WAS EXONERATED.

>> THIS IS A PICTURE OF MY BROTHER, ONE OF MY FAVORITE >> THIS IS A PICTURE OF MY BROTHER, ONE OF MY FAVORITE PICTURES.

BROTHER, ONE OF MY FAVORITE PICTURES.

IN 1985, GREG AND HIS WIFE, PICTURES.

IN 1985, GREG AND HIS WIFE, KATHY, AND THEIR TWO LITTLE IN 1985, GREG AND HIS WIFE, KATHY, AND THEIR TWO LITTLE GIRLS WERE LIVING IN TULSA.

KATHY, AND THEIR TWO LITTLE GIRLS WERE LIVING IN TULSA.

AND ON JUNE 1st OF 1985, KATHY GIRLS WERE LIVING IN TULSA.

AND ON JUNE 1st OF 1985, KATHY WAS BRUTALLY MURDERED.

AND ON JUNE 1st OF 1985, KATHY WAS BRUTALLY MURDERED.

HE WAS ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH WAS BRUTALLY MURDERED.

HE WAS ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH CAPITAL MURDER.

HE WAS ARRESTED AND CHARGED WITH CAPITAL MURDER.

>> MY PARENTS HIRED AN ATTORNEY CAPITAL MURDER.

>> MY PARENTS HIRED AN ATTORNEY WHO, UNFORTUNATELY, TURNED OUT >> MY PARENTS HIRED AN ATTORNEY WHO, UNFORTUNATELY, TURNED OUT TO BE AN ALCOHOLIC WITH BRAIN WHO, UNFORTUNATELY, TURNED OUT TO BE AN ALCOHOLIC WITH BRAIN DAMAGE FROM A NUMBER OF FALLS TO BE AN ALCOHOLIC WITH BRAIN DAMAGE FROM A NUMBER OF FALLS HE'D TAKEN WHEN HE WAS DRUNK, DAMAGE FROM A NUMBER OF FALLS HE'D TAKEN WHEN HE WAS DRUNK, AND, ULTIMATELY, UM, HE PUT ON HE'D TAKEN WHEN HE WAS DRUNK, AND, ULTIMATELY, UM, HE PUT ON ABSOLUTELY NO DEFENSE.

AND, ULTIMATELY, UM, HE PUT ON ABSOLUTELY NO DEFENSE.

HE DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO ABSOLUTELY NO DEFENSE.

HE DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DEFEND GREG.

HE DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DEFEND GREG.

>> Reporter: BUT GREG WAS DEFEND GREG.

>> Reporter: BUT GREG WAS EVENTUALLY GIVEN A NEW TRIAL.

>> Reporter: BUT GREG WAS EVENTUALLY GIVEN A NEW TRIAL.

AFTER A DIRECTED VERDICT OF EVENTUALLY GIVEN A NEW TRIAL.

AFTER A DIRECTED VERDICT OF INNOCENCE, HE WAS RELEASED FROM AFTER A DIRECTED VERDICT OF INNOCENCE, HE WAS RELEASED FROM PRISON.

INNOCENCE, HE WAS RELEASED FROM PRISON.

>> MEANING THAT THE DEFENSE PRISON.

>> MEANING THAT THE DEFENSE DIDN'T EVEN HAVE TO PUT ON THEIR >> MEANING THAT THE DEFENSE DIDN'T EVEN HAVE TO PUT ON THEIR CASE.

DIDN'T EVEN HAVE TO PUT ON THEIR CASE.

THE JUDGE STOPPED THE TRIAL AND CASE.

THE JUDGE STOPPED THE TRIAL AND SAID IT SHOULD HAVE NEVER HAVE THE JUDGE STOPPED THE TRIAL AND SAID IT SHOULD HAVE NEVER HAVE GONE TO TRIAL.

SAID IT SHOULD HAVE NEVER HAVE GONE TO TRIAL.

>> Reporter: GARY DRINKARD FACED GONE TO TRIAL.

>> Reporter: GARY DRINKARD FACED A SIMILAR SITUATION BEFORE HE >> Reporter: GARY DRINKARD FACED A SIMILAR SITUATION BEFORE HE WORKED WITH WITNESS TO A SIMILAR SITUATION BEFORE HE WORKED WITH WITNESS TO INNOCENCE.

WORKED WITH WITNESS TO INNOCENCE.

HE SAYS HAVING PROPERLY LEGAL INNOCENCE.

HE SAYS HAVING PROPERLY LEGAL REPRESENTATION DURING A TRIAL HE SAYS HAVING PROPERLY LEGAL REPRESENTATION DURING A TRIAL CAN BE A MATTER OF LIFE AND REPRESENTATION DURING A TRIAL CAN BE A MATTER OF LIFE AND DEATH.

CAN BE A MATTER OF LIFE AND DEATH.

>> IF YOU DON'T HAVE SOME GOOD DEATH.

>> IF YOU DON'T HAVE SOME GOOD REPRESENTATION DURING TRIAL, >> IF YOU DON'T HAVE SOME GOOD REPRESENTATION DURING TRIAL, YOU'RE GOING TO GET CONVICTED REPRESENTATION DURING TRIAL, YOU'RE GOING TO GET CONVICTED BECAUSE A STATE'S ATTORNEY CAN YOU'RE GOING TO GET CONVICTED BECAUSE A STATE'S ATTORNEY CAN MAKE JESUS CHRIST LOOK LIKE HE'S BECAUSE A STATE'S ATTORNEY CAN MAKE JESUS CHRIST LOOK LIKE HE'S GOT HORNS.

MAKE JESUS CHRIST LOOK LIKE HE'S GOT HORNS.

>> Reporter: 180 PEOPLE GOT HORNS.

>> Reporter: 180 PEOPLE WRONGFULLY CONVICTED AND >> Reporter: 180 PEOPLE WRONGFULLY CONVICTED AND SENTENCED TO DEATH IN THE U.S. WRONGFULLY CONVICTED AND SENTENCED TO DEATH IN THE U.S. HAVE BEEN EXONERATED.

SENTENCED TO DEATH IN THE U.S. HAVE BEEN EXONERATED.

IN OKLAHOMA, THE NUMBER IS TEN.

HAVE BEEN EXONERATED.

IN OKLAHOMA, THE NUMBER IS TEN.

>> WE GO ALL OVER THE WORLD, NOT IN OKLAHOMA, THE NUMBER IS TEN.

>> WE GO ALL OVER THE WORLD, NOT JUST IN AMERICA, WE GO ALL OVER >> WE GO ALL OVER THE WORLD, NOT JUST IN AMERICA, WE GO ALL OVER THE WORLD AND SPEAK OUT AGAINST JUST IN AMERICA, WE GO ALL OVER THE WORLD AND SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY.

THE WORLD AND SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY.

ANYWHERE THERE'S SOMEONE THAT THE DEATH PENALTY.

ANYWHERE THERE'S SOMEONE THAT HAS INNOCENCE ISSUES, I MEAN, ANYWHERE THERE'S SOMEONE THAT HAS INNOCENCE ISSUES, I MEAN, EVEN IF THEY'RE GUILTY, WE WOULD HAS INNOCENCE ISSUES, I MEAN, EVEN IF THEY'RE GUILTY, WE WOULD HAVE THEM -- EVEN IF THEY'RE GUILTY, WE WOULD HAVE THEM -- >> Reporter: HE SAYS LIFE HAVE THEM -- >> Reporter: HE SAYS LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE WOULD BE >> Reporter: HE SAYS LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE WOULD BE PUNISHMENT ENOUGH.

WITHOUT PAROLE WOULD BE PUNISHMENT ENOUGH.

>> IF YOU'RE IN THERE FOR THE PUNISHMENT ENOUGH.

>> IF YOU'RE IN THERE FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE, YOU SUFFER >> IF YOU'RE IN THERE FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE, YOU SUFFER EVERY DAY.

REST OF YOUR LIFE, YOU SUFFER EVERY DAY.

YOU CAN GET ANY TYPE OF STORY EVERY DAY.

YOU CAN GET ANY TYPE OF STORY OUT WHERE PEOPLE WILL LISTEN AND YOU CAN GET ANY TYPE OF STORY OUT WHERE PEOPLE WILL LISTEN AND IT BECOMES JUST SO HOPELESS, OUT WHERE PEOPLE WILL LISTEN AND IT BECOMES JUST SO HOPELESS, IT'S UNREAL.

IT BECOMES JUST SO HOPELESS, IT'S UNREAL.

I MEAN, I HAD THOUGHTS OF IT'S UNREAL.

I MEAN, I HAD THOUGHTS OF SUICIDE.

I MEAN, I HAD THOUGHTS OF SUICIDE.

>> Reporter: BUT ATTORNEY SUICIDE.

>> Reporter: BUT ATTORNEY GENERAL O'CONNOR SAYS THIS IS >> Reporter: BUT ATTORNEY GENERAL O'CONNOR SAYS THIS IS ABOUT JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIMS' GENERAL O'CONNOR SAYS THIS IS ABOUT JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIMS' FAMILIES.

ABOUT JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIMS' FAMILIES.

>> IT'S FOR EVERY ONE OF THE 43 FAMILIES.

>> IT'S FOR EVERY ONE OF THE 43 PEOPLE WHO ARE ON DEATH ROW, >> IT'S FOR EVERY ONE OF THE 43 PEOPLE WHO ARE ON DEATH ROW, THERE'S A STORY, AND THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE ON DEATH ROW, THERE'S A STORY, AND THERE ARE LIVES THAT WERE DESTROYED OR THERE'S A STORY, AND THERE ARE LIVES THAT WERE DESTROYED OR DAMAGED.

LIVES THAT WERE DESTROYED OR DAMAGED.

I MEAN, THESE WERE GORY FOR DAMAGED.

I MEAN, THESE WERE GORY FOR EVERY ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS, I MEAN, THESE WERE GORY FOR EVERY ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS, KEEP IN MIND THAT THE PROSECUTOR EVERY ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS, KEEP IN MIND THAT THE PROSECUTOR HAS TO DETERMINE THAT IT'S A KEEP IN MIND THAT THE PROSECUTOR HAS TO DETERMINE THAT IT'S A PARTICULARLY HEINOUS CRIME.

HAS TO DETERMINE THAT IT'S A PARTICULARLY HEINOUS CRIME.

>> Reporter: FIVE OF THE PARTICULARLY HEINOUS CRIME.

>> Reporter: FIVE OF THE EXECUTION ARE SCHEDULED FOR THE >> Reporter: FIVE OF THE EXECUTION ARE SCHEDULED FOR THE REST OF THIS YEAR.

EXECUTION ARE SCHEDULED FOR THE REST OF THIS YEAR.

TEN ARE PLANNED FOR NEXT YEAR, REST OF THIS YEAR.

TEN ARE PLANNED FOR NEXT YEAR, AND THE OTHER TEN ARE SET FOR TEN ARE PLANNED FOR NEXT YEAR, AND THE OTHER TEN ARE SET FOR 2024.

AND THE OTHER TEN ARE SET FOR 2024.

JASON?

2024.

JASON?

>> THANKS.

JASON?

>> THANKS.

THE SUPREME COURT ALSO ISSUED A >> THANKS.

THE SUPREME COURT ALSO ISSUED A HANDFUL OF RULINGS THAT COULD THE SUPREME COURT ALSO ISSUED A HANDFUL OF RULINGS THAT COULD HAVE A DRAMATIC IMPACT ON LIFE HANDFUL OF RULINGS THAT COULD HAVE A DRAMATIC IMPACT ON LIFE IN OKLAHOMA, INCLUDING HAVE A DRAMATIC IMPACT ON LIFE IN OKLAHOMA, INCLUDING CONTENTIOUS DECISIONS ON GUN IN OKLAHOMA, INCLUDING CONTENTIOUS DECISIONS ON GUN RIGHTS, SCHOOL CHOICE, SCHOOL CONTENTIOUS DECISIONS ON GUN RIGHTS, SCHOOL CHOICE, SCHOOL PRAYER, AND THE EPA'S ABILITY TO RIGHTS, SCHOOL CHOICE, SCHOOL PRAYER, AND THE EPA'S ABILITY TO REGULATE CLIMATE CHANGE.

PRAYER, AND THE EPA'S ABILITY TO REGULATE CLIMATE CHANGE.

BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE RIFLE REGULATE CLIMATE CHANGE.

BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION v. BRUIN BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION v. BRUIN DECISION WAS HANDED DOWN BY THE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION v. BRUIN DECISION WAS HANDED DOWN BY THE U.S.ING IS IN LATE JUNE, DECISION WAS HANDED DOWN BY THE U.S.ING IS IN LATE JUNE, OKLAHOMA WAS ALREADY A U.S.ING IS IN LATE JUNE, OKLAHOMA WAS ALREADY A PERMITLESS CARRY STATE.

OKLAHOMA WAS ALREADY A PERMITLESS CARRY STATE.

WOMEN FOR GUN RIGHTS FOUNDER PERMITLESS CARRY STATE.

WOMEN FOR GUN RIGHTS FOUNDER BELIEVES THE SUPREME COURT'S WOMEN FOR GUN RIGHTS FOUNDER BELIEVES THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION RESTORED CONSTITUTIONAL BELIEVES THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION RESTORED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF LEGAL GUN OWNERS.

DECISION RESTORED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF LEGAL GUN OWNERS.

>> WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU HAVE RIGHTS OF LEGAL GUN OWNERS.

>> WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU HAVE TO PROVE CAUSE THAT YOU NEED TO >> WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU HAVE TO PROVE CAUSE THAT YOU NEED TO BE ABLE TO SPEAK ON THE FIRST TO PROVE CAUSE THAT YOU NEED TO BE ABLE TO SPEAK ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT?

BE ABLE TO SPEAK ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT?

SO, IN THE SAME MANNER, YOU AMENDMENT?

SO, IN THE SAME MANNER, YOU DON'T HAVE TO PROVE THAT YOU SO, IN THE SAME MANNER, YOU DON'T HAVE TO PROVE THAT YOU NEED A SECOND AMENDMENT.

DON'T HAVE TO PROVE THAT YOU NEED A SECOND AMENDMENT.

>> NOT EVERYONE AGREES.

NEED A SECOND AMENDMENT.

>> NOT EVERYONE AGREES.

>> WE BELIEVE THE SUPREME COURT >> NOT EVERYONE AGREES.

>> WE BELIEVE THE SUPREME COURT IS WRONG AND DANGEROUS.

>> WE BELIEVE THE SUPREME COURT IS WRONG AND DANGEROUS.

I KNOW THAT SOUNDS CHALLENGING IS WRONG AND DANGEROUS.

I KNOW THAT SOUNDS CHALLENGING TO SAY THAT.

I KNOW THAT SOUNDS CHALLENGING TO SAY THAT.

HOWEVER, IT IS OUT OF TOUCH WITH TO SAY THAT.

HOWEVER, IT IS OUT OF TOUCH WITH THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF HOWEVER, IT IS OUT OF TOUCH WITH THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WHO STRONGLY SUPPORT THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WHO STRONGLY SUPPORT GUN SAFETY.

AMERICANS WHO STRONGLY SUPPORT GUN SAFETY.

>> KAY MALAN, A VOLUNTEER SAYS GUN SAFETY.

>> KAY MALAN, A VOLUNTEER SAYS THAT THE SUPREME COURT'S >> KAY MALAN, A VOLUNTEER SAYS THAT THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION COULD MAKE PUBLIC THAT THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION COULD MAKE PUBLIC PLACES MORE DANGEROUS.

DECISION COULD MAKE PUBLIC PLACES MORE DANGEROUS.

>> THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE PLACES MORE DANGEROUS.

>> THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO GO TO THE STORE, TO >> THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO GO TO THE STORE, TO CHURCH, UM, YOU KNOW, TO -- TO ABLE TO GO TO THE STORE, TO CHURCH, UM, YOU KNOW, TO -- TO THE DOCTOR AND TAKE A FAMILY TO CHURCH, UM, YOU KNOW, TO -- TO THE DOCTOR AND TAKE A FAMILY TO WATCH A PARADE WITHOUT THE FEAR THE DOCTOR AND TAKE A FAMILY TO WATCH A PARADE WITHOUT THE FEAR OF BEING SHOT AND KILLED.

WATCH A PARADE WITHOUT THE FEAR OF BEING SHOT AND KILLED.

>> SHE CONTENDS GUN OWNERS NEED OF BEING SHOT AND KILLED.

>> SHE CONTENDS GUN OWNERS NEED TO SEEK OUT TRAINING, BUT IT >> SHE CONTENDS GUN OWNERS NEED TO SEEK OUT TRAINING, BUT IT SHOULD NOT BE MANDATED.

TO SEEK OUT TRAINING, BUT IT SHOULD NOT BE MANDATED.

>> I CAN'T STRESS TRAINING SHOULD NOT BE MANDATED.

>> I CAN'T STRESS TRAINING ENOUGH; ALTHOUGH, I DON'T WANT >> I CAN'T STRESS TRAINING ENOUGH; ALTHOUGH, I DON'T WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO SAY THIS IS ENOUGH; ALTHOUGH, I DON'T WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO SAY THIS IS MANDATORY TO EXERCISE A THE GOVERNMENT TO SAY THIS IS MANDATORY TO EXERCISE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.

MANDATORY TO EXERCISE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.

>> THE SUPREME COURT ALSO HANDED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.

>> THE SUPREME COURT ALSO HANDED DOWN A DECISION IN THE WEST >> THE SUPREME COURT ALSO HANDED DOWN A DECISION IN THE WEST VIRGINIA v. EPA CASE THAT DOWN A DECISION IN THE WEST VIRGINIA v. EPA CASE THAT IMPACTS HOW ELECTRICITY IS VIRGINIA v. EPA CASE THAT IMPACTS HOW ELECTRICITY IS GENERATED.

IMPACTS HOW ELECTRICITY IS GENERATED.

>> IT REALLY STARTS DURING THE GENERATED.

>> IT REALLY STARTS DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE EPA >> IT REALLY STARTS DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE EPA THAT WAS INVOLVED IN THAT OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND THE EPA THAT WAS INVOLVED IN THAT ADMINISTRATION.

THAT WAS INVOLVED IN THAT ADMINISTRATION.

THEY ADOPTED WHAT'S CALLED THE ADMINISTRATION.

THEY ADOPTED WHAT'S CALLED THE CLEAN POWER PLANT.

THEY ADOPTED WHAT'S CALLED THE CLEAN POWER PLANT.

>> THE SUPREME COURT HELD IT UP.

CLEAN POWER PLANT.

>> THE SUPREME COURT HELD IT UP.

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TOOK >> THE SUPREME COURT HELD IT UP.

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TOOK OVER THE EPA AND DECIDED TO THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TOOK OVER THE EPA AND DECIDED TO REPLACE THAT PLAN WITH ONE OF OVER THE EPA AND DECIDED TO REPLACE THAT PLAN WITH ONE OF ITS OWN.

REPLACE THAT PLAN WITH ONE OF ITS OWN.

>> THE SUPREME COURT ACTUALLY ITS OWN.

>> THE SUPREME COURT ACTUALLY DIDN'T REVERSE THE EPA; IT >> THE SUPREME COURT ACTUALLY DIDN'T REVERSE THE EPA; IT ACTUALLY JUST UPHELD THE TRUMP DIDN'T REVERSE THE EPA; IT ACTUALLY JUST UPHELD THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S ACTION, WHICH ACTUALLY JUST UPHELD THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S ACTION, WHICH REPEALED THE CLEAN POWER PLANT.

ADMINISTRATION'S ACTION, WHICH REPEALED THE CLEAN POWER PLANT.

>> THEY WERE WORKING ON REDUCING REPEALED THE CLEAN POWER PLANT.

>> THEY WERE WORKING ON REDUCING CARBON EMISSIONS.

>> THEY WERE WORKING ON REDUCING CARBON EMISSIONS.

IN 2012, THE UTILITY COMPANY AND CARBON EMISSIONS.

IN 2012, THE UTILITY COMPANY AND THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, AS WELL IN 2012, THE UTILITY COMPANY AND THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, AS WELL AS THE EPA, ENTERED INTO A THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, AS WELL AS THE EPA, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT SETTLEMENT MEANT TO AS THE EPA, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT SETTLEMENT MEANT TO REDUCE EMISSIONS.

CONSENT SETTLEMENT MEANT TO REDUCE EMISSIONS.

>> THERE WERE THREE IMPORTANT REDUCE EMISSIONS.

>> THERE WERE THREE IMPORTANT POINTS TO THAT SETTLEMENT.

>> THERE WERE THREE IMPORTANT POINTS TO THAT SETTLEMENT.

FIRST, WE AGREED TO DO SOME POINTS TO THAT SETTLEMENT.

FIRST, WE AGREED TO DO SOME RETROFITTING TO SOME OF OUR FIRST, WE AGREED TO DO SOME RETROFITTING TO SOME OF OUR NATURAL GAS FACILITIES, TO RETROFITTING TO SOME OF OUR NATURAL GAS FACILITIES, TO EXTEND THEIR LIVES.

NATURAL GAS FACILITIES, TO EXTEND THEIR LIVES.

WE AGREED TO CLOSE ONE OF OUR EXTEND THEIR LIVES.

WE AGREED TO CLOSE ONE OF OUR TWO COAL POWER PLANTS AT THAT WE AGREED TO CLOSE ONE OF OUR TWO COAL POWER PLANTS AT THAT POINT UP AT OUR NORTHEASTERN TWO COAL POWER PLANTS AT THAT POINT UP AT OUR NORTHEASTERN STATION AND WE AGREED TO ADD POINT UP AT OUR NORTHEASTERN STATION AND WE AGREED TO ADD EMISSION CONTROLS TO THE STATION AND WE AGREED TO ADD EMISSION CONTROLS TO THE REMAINING COAL PLANTS THERE TO EMISSION CONTROLS TO THE REMAINING COAL PLANTS THERE TO EXTENT ITS LIFE TO 2026.

REMAINING COAL PLANTS THERE TO EXTENT ITS LIFE TO 2026.

>> IT WILL BE 2026 WHEN PSO WILL EXTENT ITS LIFE TO 2026.

>> IT WILL BE 2026 WHEN PSO WILL NO LONGER USE COAL.

>> IT WILL BE 2026 WHEN PSO WILL NO LONGER USE COAL.

DESPITE THE DECISION RESTRICTING NO LONGER USE COAL.

DESPITE THE DECISION RESTRICTING THE EPA FROM ENFORCING A MOVE DESPITE THE DECISION RESTRICTING THE EPA FROM ENFORCING A MOVE FROM COAL TO LESSER CARBON THE EPA FROM ENFORCING A MOVE FROM COAL TO LESSER CARBON INTENSIVE FUELS TO GENERATE FROM COAL TO LESSER CARBON INTENSIVE FUELS TO GENERATE ELECTRIC, THEY WILL REDUCE INTENSIVE FUELS TO GENERATE ELECTRIC, THEY WILL REDUCE EMISSIONS FROM POWER PLANTS AND ELECTRIC, THEY WILL REDUCE EMISSIONS FROM POWER PLANTS AND OTHER SOURCES.

EMISSIONS FROM POWER PLANTS AND OTHER SOURCES.

>> IT AVOIDS POTENTIAL OTHER SOURCES.

>> IT AVOIDS POTENTIAL COMPLIANCE COSTS AND MITIGATION >> IT AVOIDS POTENTIAL COMPLIANCE COSTS AND MITIGATION ISSUES, AND IT ALSO ALLOWED US COMPLIANCE COSTS AND MITIGATION ISSUES, AND IT ALSO ALLOWED US TO SHIFT INVESTMENT TO RENEWABLE ISSUES, AND IT ALSO ALLOWED US TO SHIFT INVESTMENT TO RENEWABLE ENERGY WHICH IS GOING TO SAVE TO SHIFT INVESTMENT TO RENEWABLE ENERGY WHICH IS GOING TO SAVE OUR CUSTOMERS $1 BILLION IN FUEL ENERGY WHICH IS GOING TO SAVE OUR CUSTOMERS $1 BILLION IN FUEL COSTS OVER THE NEXT 30 YEARS.

OUR CUSTOMERS $1 BILLION IN FUEL COSTS OVER THE NEXT 30 YEARS.

>> THE STATE'S OTHER LARGE COSTS OVER THE NEXT 30 YEARS.

>> THE STATE'S OTHER LARGE ELECTRIC UTILITY OG&E IS ALSO >> THE STATE'S OTHER LARGE ELECTRIC UTILITY OG&E IS ALSO REDUCING EMISSIONS.

ELECTRIC UTILITY OG&E IS ALSO REDUCING EMISSIONS.

NATURAL GAS CURRENTLY DOMINATING REDUCING EMISSIONS.

NATURAL GAS CURRENTLY DOMINATING THE QUEUE THE UTILITY GENERATES NATURAL GAS CURRENTLY DOMINATING THE QUEUE THE UTILITY GENERATES ELECTRICITY.

THE QUEUE THE UTILITY GENERATES ELECTRICITY.

IT HAS PLANS TO REDUCE EMISSIONS ELECTRICITY.

IT HAS PLANS TO REDUCE EMISSIONS BY 50% BY 2030 AND RETIRE MOST IT HAS PLANS TO REDUCE EMISSIONS BY 50% BY 2030 AND RETIRE MOST OF ITS FOSSIL FUEL GENERATION BY BY 50% BY 2030 AND RETIRE MOST OF ITS FOSSIL FUEL GENERATION BY 2050.

OF ITS FOSSIL FUEL GENERATION BY 2050.

THEY WERE IN THE SPOTLIGHT FOR 2050.

THEY WERE IN THE SPOTLIGHT FOR OTHER DECISIONS.

THEY WERE IN THE SPOTLIGHT FOR OTHER DECISIONS.

ONE WHICH ALLOWS FOR PRAYER ON OTHER DECISIONS.

ONE WHICH ALLOWS FOR PRAYER ON SCHOOL GROUNDS AFTER ONE WHICH ALLOWS FOR PRAYER ON SCHOOL GROUNDS AFTER EXTRACURRICULAR EVENTS.

SCHOOL GROUNDS AFTER EXTRACURRICULAR EVENTS.

>> THE SUPREME COURT FOUND THAT EXTRACURRICULAR EVENTS.

>> THE SUPREME COURT FOUND THAT HIS MESSAGE, WHAT HE WAS DOING, >> THE SUPREME COURT FOUND THAT HIS MESSAGE, WHAT HE WAS DOING, WAS PRIVATE.

HIS MESSAGE, WHAT HE WAS DOING, WAS PRIVATE.

IT WAS NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF WAS PRIVATE.

IT WAS NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF HIS EMPLOYMENT, WHICH WAS IT WAS NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF HIS EMPLOYMENT, WHICH WAS IMPORTANT.

HIS EMPLOYMENT, WHICH WAS IMPORTANT.

AND THAT IF WE DON'T LET THE IMPORTANT.

AND THAT IF WE DON'T LET THE FIRST AMENDMENT LIVE, THE REST AND THAT IF WE DON'T LET THE FIRST AMENDMENT LIVE, THE REST OF IT WILL BE FALL BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT LIVE, THE REST OF IT WILL BE FALL BY THE WAYSIDE.

OF IT WILL BE FALL BY THE WAYSIDE.

>> THE OTHER DECISION TOOK PLACE WAYSIDE.

>> THE OTHER DECISION TOOK PLACE IN MAY WHERE THE STATE WAS >> THE OTHER DECISION TOOK PLACE IN MAY WHERE THE STATE WAS CHALLENGED FOR NOT SENDING STATE IN MAY WHERE THE STATE WAS CHALLENGED FOR NOT SENDING STATE DOLLARS TO A RELIGIOUS SCHOOL.

CHALLENGED FOR NOT SENDING STATE DOLLARS TO A RELIGIOUS SCHOOL.

>> IT HAD TO BE A NON-RELIGIOUS, DOLLARS TO A RELIGIOUS SCHOOL.

>> IT HAD TO BE A NON-RELIGIOUS, NONFAITH-BASED INSTITUTION.

>> IT HAD TO BE A NON-RELIGIOUS, NONFAITH-BASED INSTITUTION.

WHAT THE SUPREME COURT SAID IS, NONFAITH-BASED INSTITUTION.

WHAT THE SUPREME COURT SAID IS, HEY, THAT'S THE SAME THING AS WHAT THE SUPREME COURT SAID IS, HEY, THAT'S THE SAME THING AS REQUIRING IT TO BE A RELIGIOUS HEY, THAT'S THE SAME THING AS REQUIRING IT TO BE A RELIGIOUS SCHOOL.

REQUIRING IT TO BE A RELIGIOUS SCHOOL.

>> STATE REPRESENTATIVE MARK SCHOOL.

>> STATE REPRESENTATIVE MARK McBRIDE IS THE CHAIR OF >> STATE REPRESENTATIVE MARK McBRIDE IS THE CHAIR OF APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET McBRIDE IS THE CHAIR OF APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE.

APPROPRIATIONS AND BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE.

WHILE HE FEELS THE SUPREME SUBCOMMITTEE.

WHILE HE FEELS THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION WILL HAVE WHILE HE FEELS THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION WILL HAVE LITTLE IMPACT IN OKLAHOMA, IT COURT'S DECISION WILL HAVE LITTLE IMPACT IN OKLAHOMA, IT COULD OPEN A PANDORA'S BOX FOR LITTLE IMPACT IN OKLAHOMA, IT COULD OPEN A PANDORA'S BOX FOR PRIVATE RELIGIOUS-BASED SCHOOLS.

COULD OPEN A PANDORA'S BOX FOR PRIVATE RELIGIOUS-BASED SCHOOLS.

>> ONCE YOUR PRIVATE, CHRISTIAN PRIVATE RELIGIOUS-BASED SCHOOLS.

>> ONCE YOUR PRIVATE, CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS START TAKING STATE OR >> ONCE YOUR PRIVATE, CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS START TAKING STATE OR FEDERAL FUNDS, ARE THEY STILL SCHOOLS START TAKING STATE OR FEDERAL FUNDS, ARE THEY STILL GOING TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE FEDERAL FUNDS, ARE THEY STILL GOING TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE SAME MORAL PRINCIPLES THEY'VE GOING TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE SAME MORAL PRINCIPLES THEY'VE HAD IN THE PAST?

SAME MORAL PRINCIPLES THEY'VE HAD IN THE PAST?

>> AT THE PRIMARY VICTORY PARTY HAD IN THE PAST?

>> AT THE PRIMARY VICTORY PARTY LAST WEEK, KEVIN STITT SAID >> AT THE PRIMARY VICTORY PARTY LAST WEEK, KEVIN STITT SAID OKLAHOMA WOULD BE A LEADING LAST WEEK, KEVIN STITT SAID OKLAHOMA WOULD BE A LEADING FORCE IN HELPING AND PROTECTING OKLAHOMA WOULD BE A LEADING FORCE IN HELPING AND PROTECTING EXPECTANT MOTHERS AND THEIR FORCE IN HELPING AND PROTECTING EXPECTANT MOTHERS AND THEIR NEWBORNS DURING AND AFTER THE EXPECTANT MOTHERS AND THEIR NEWBORNS DURING AND AFTER THE MOTHER'S PREGNANCY.

NEWBORNS DURING AND AFTER THE MOTHER'S PREGNANCY.

BUT HOW WOULD THAT WORK AND ARE MOTHER'S PREGNANCY.

BUT HOW WOULD THAT WORK AND ARE PROGRAMS IN PLACE TO ACHIEVE BUT HOW WOULD THAT WORK AND ARE PROGRAMS IN PLACE TO ACHIEVE THAT AFTER THE REVERSAL OF PROGRAMS IN PLACE TO ACHIEVE THAT AFTER THE REVERSAL OF ROE V. WADE?

THAT AFTER THE REVERSAL OF ROE V. WADE?

>> I SPOKE WITH THE OKLAHOMA ROE V. WADE?

>> I SPOKE WITH THE OKLAHOMA HEALTHCARE AUTHORITY ABOUT A FEW >> I SPOKE WITH THE OKLAHOMA HEALTHCARE AUTHORITY ABOUT A FEW PROGRAMS THAT ASSIST EXPECTANT HEALTHCARE AUTHORITY ABOUT A FEW PROGRAMS THAT ASSIST EXPECTANT MOTHERS IN OKLAHOMA AND A MOM PROGRAMS THAT ASSIST EXPECTANT MOTHERS IN OKLAHOMA AND A MOM WHO HAS USED STATE SERVICES IN MOTHERS IN OKLAHOMA AND A MOM WHO HAS USED STATE SERVICES IN THE PAST.

WHO HAS USED STATE SERVICES IN THE PAST.

>> I MICROWAVED FOOD.

THE PAST.

>> I MICROWAVED FOOD.

>> Reporter: JENNIFER DAVIS IS >> I MICROWAVED FOOD.

>> Reporter: JENNIFER DAVIS IS IN THE HUSTLE AND BUSTLE OF LIFE >> Reporter: JENNIFER DAVIS IS IN THE HUSTLE AND BUSTLE OF LIFE AS A SINGLE MOM AND IN ORDER TO IN THE HUSTLE AND BUSTLE OF LIFE AS A SINGLE MOM AND IN ORDER TO GET HER DAUGHTER TO GYMNASTICS AS A SINGLE MOM AND IN ORDER TO GET HER DAUGHTER TO GYMNASTICS ON TIME, DINNER IS SERVED IN A GET HER DAUGHTER TO GYMNASTICS ON TIME, DINNER IS SERVED IN A TO-GO CUP.

ON TIME, DINNER IS SERVED IN A TO-GO CUP.

THE MOORE, OKLAHOMA MOTHER TO-GO CUP.

THE MOORE, OKLAHOMA MOTHER RAISED BOTH CHILDREN ALONE WHILE THE MOORE, OKLAHOMA MOTHER RAISED BOTH CHILDREN ALONE WHILE PUTTING HERSELF THROUGH NURSING RAISED BOTH CHILDREN ALONE WHILE PUTTING HERSELF THROUGH NURSING SCHOOL AND COLLEGE.

PUTTING HERSELF THROUGH NURSING SCHOOL AND COLLEGE.

>> I HAD A TWO-WEEK-OLD BABY AND SCHOOL AND COLLEGE.

>> I HAD A TWO-WEEK-OLD BABY AND HE THREW A HAMMER AT ME WITH A >> I HAD A TWO-WEEK-OLD BABY AND HE THREW A HAMMER AT ME WITH A BABY IN MY HANDS.

HE THREW A HAMMER AT ME WITH A BABY IN MY HANDS.

I DODGED THE HAMMER AND IT BROKE BABY IN MY HANDS.

I DODGED THE HAMMER AND IT BROKE THE GLASS WINDOW BEHIND ME.

I DODGED THE HAMMER AND IT BROKE THE GLASS WINDOW BEHIND ME.

FROM THAT POINT ON, MY BABY WAS THE GLASS WINDOW BEHIND ME.

FROM THAT POINT ON, MY BABY WAS TWO WEEKS OLD AND I LEFT THE FROM THAT POINT ON, MY BABY WAS TWO WEEKS OLD AND I LEFT THE FATHER TO BE A SINGLE MOM.

TWO WEEKS OLD AND I LEFT THE FATHER TO BE A SINGLE MOM.

>> Reporter: THAT BABY, DYLAN, FATHER TO BE A SINGLE MOM.

>> Reporter: THAT BABY, DYLAN, IS NOW 24 YEARS OLD AND HAS >> Reporter: THAT BABY, DYLAN, IS NOW 24 YEARS OLD AND HAS NEVER HAD A RELATIONSHIP WITH IS NOW 24 YEARS OLD AND HAS NEVER HAD A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MAN WHO THREW THE HAMMER AT NEVER HAD A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MAN WHO THREW THE HAMMER AT HIS WIFE AND NEWBORN SON.

THE MAN WHO THREW THE HAMMER AT HIS WIFE AND NEWBORN SON.

WHEN DYLAN WAS 16, JENNIFER GOT HIS WIFE AND NEWBORN SON.

WHEN DYLAN WAS 16, JENNIFER GOT PREGNANT WITH BROOKLYN AND ONCE WHEN DYLAN WAS 16, JENNIFER GOT PREGNANT WITH BROOKLYN AND ONCE AGAIN LEFT TO RAISE THE BABY PREGNANT WITH BROOKLYN AND ONCE AGAIN LEFT TO RAISE THE BABY ALONE.

AGAIN LEFT TO RAISE THE BABY ALONE.

SINGLE PARENTS CAN CHIEF CHILD ALONE.

SINGLE PARENTS CAN CHIEF CHILD SUPPORT FROM CO-PARENT.

SINGLE PARENTS CAN CHIEF CHILD SUPPORT FROM CO-PARENT.

>> HIS BALANCE IS CLOSE TO SUPPORT FROM CO-PARENT.

>> HIS BALANCE IS CLOSE TO $150,000 IS WHAT HE OWES FOR MY >> HIS BALANCE IS CLOSE TO $150,000 IS WHAT HE OWES FOR MY BIG KID.

$150,000 IS WHAT HE OWES FOR MY BIG KID.

NOW, JUST BECAUSE HE TURNED 18, BIG KID.

NOW, JUST BECAUSE HE TURNED 18, IT STOPS ACCRUING, BUT HE STILL NOW, JUST BECAUSE HE TURNED 18, IT STOPS ACCRUING, BUT HE STILL OWES THE DEBT.

IT STOPS ACCRUING, BUT HE STILL OWES THE DEBT.

I FILED CHILD SUPPORT AND IT OWES THE DEBT.

I FILED CHILD SUPPORT AND IT TOOK ME THREE YEARS WITHOUT AN I FILED CHILD SUPPORT AND IT TOOK ME THREE YEARS WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY TO GET IT APPROVED TOOK ME THREE YEARS WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY TO GET IT APPROVED THROUGH THE STATE.

ATTORNEY TO GET IT APPROVED THROUGH THE STATE.

>> Reporter: GOVERNOR STITT THROUGH THE STATE.

>> Reporter: GOVERNOR STITT ANNOUNCED THAT HIS PRIMARY >> Reporter: GOVERNOR STITT ANNOUNCED THAT HIS PRIMARY ELECTION PARTY THAT OKLAHOMA ANNOUNCED THAT HIS PRIMARY ELECTION PARTY THAT OKLAHOMA WILL LOVE THE MOTHER AND THE ELECTION PARTY THAT OKLAHOMA WILL LOVE THE MOTHER AND THE CHILD.

WILL LOVE THE MOTHER AND THE CHILD.

>> WE'RE GOING TO BE NUMBER ONE CHILD.

>> WE'RE GOING TO BE NUMBER ONE IN THE COUNTRY AT SUPPORTING >> WE'RE GOING TO BE NUMBER ONE IN THE COUNTRY AT SUPPORTING PREGNANCIES AND MOTHERS AND IN THE COUNTRY AT SUPPORTING PREGNANCIES AND MOTHERS AND THAT'S KIND OF MY COMMITMENT TO PREGNANCIES AND MOTHERS AND THAT'S KIND OF MY COMMITMENT TO THE HEALTHCARE IN OKLAHOMA.

THAT'S KIND OF MY COMMITMENT TO THE HEALTHCARE IN OKLAHOMA.

>> Reporter: THE 2022 RANKING THE HEALTHCARE IN OKLAHOMA.

>> Reporter: THE 2022 RANKING FOR BEST AND WORST STATES FOR >> Reporter: THE 2022 RANKING FOR BEST AND WORST STATES FOR WOMEN RANKED OKLAHOMA AS 50th IN FOR BEST AND WORST STATES FOR WOMEN RANKED OKLAHOMA AS 50th IN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING, WOMEN RANKED OKLAHOMA AS 50th IN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING, 50th IN HEALTHCARE AND SAFETY ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING, 50th IN HEALTHCARE AND SAFETY FOR WOMEN, AND 501 -- 51st FOR 50th IN HEALTHCARE AND SAFETY FOR WOMEN, AND 501 -- 51st FOR OVERALL WELL-BEING AND 33rd IN FOR WOMEN, AND 501 -- 51st FOR OVERALL WELL-BEING AND 33rd IN ECONOMIC AND 42nd IN HEALTH, OVERALL WELL-BEING AND 33rd IN ECONOMIC AND 42nd IN HEALTH, 45th IN EDUCATION AND 42nd IN ECONOMIC AND 42nd IN HEALTH, 45th IN EDUCATION AND 42nd IN OVERALL WELL-BEING FOR CHILDREN.

45th IN EDUCATION AND 42nd IN OVERALL WELL-BEING FOR CHILDREN.

OKLAHOMA HAS PROGRAMS TO HELP OVERALL WELL-BEING FOR CHILDREN.

OKLAHOMA HAS PROGRAMS TO HELP WOMEN OR SINGLE MOTHERS.

OKLAHOMA HAS PROGRAMS TO HELP WOMEN OR SINGLE MOTHERS.

FOR EXAMPLE, THE OKLAHOMA WOMEN OR SINGLE MOTHERS.

FOR EXAMPLE, THE OKLAHOMA HEALTHCARE AUTHORITY'S PREGNANCY FOR EXAMPLE, THE OKLAHOMA HEALTHCARE AUTHORITY'S PREGNANCY SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO HEALTHCARE AUTHORITY'S PREGNANCY SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO OKLAHOMA WOMEN AND GIRLS WHO ARE SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO OKLAHOMA WOMEN AND GIRLS WHO ARE EXPECTING.

OKLAHOMA WOMEN AND GIRLS WHO ARE EXPECTING.

>> IT WOULD PAY FOR HER EXPECTING.

>> IT WOULD PAY FOR HER PHYSICIAN VISITS THROUGH PRIMARY >> IT WOULD PAY FOR HER PHYSICIAN VISITS THROUGH PRIMARY CARE OR SPECIALISTS AND PAYS FOR PHYSICIAN VISITS THROUGH PRIMARY CARE OR SPECIALISTS AND PAYS FOR THE LABOR AND DELIVERY COSTS, CARE OR SPECIALISTS AND PAYS FOR THE LABOR AND DELIVERY COSTS, ULTRASOUND.

THE LABOR AND DELIVERY COSTS, ULTRASOUND.

>> Reporter: TO QUALIFY FOR ULTRASOUND.

>> Reporter: TO QUALIFY FOR THOSE SERVICES, A WOMAN MUST >> Reporter: TO QUALIFY FOR THOSE SERVICES, A WOMAN MUST MAKE LESS THAN $18,084 A YEAR THOSE SERVICES, A WOMAN MUST MAKE LESS THAN $18,084 A YEAR FOR A FAMILY OF ONE.

MAKE LESS THAN $18,084 A YEAR FOR A FAMILY OF ONE.

$24,360 FOR A FAMILY OF TWO, FOR A FAMILY OF ONE.

$24,360 FOR A FAMILY OF TWO, $30,648 FOR A FAMILY OF THREE, $24,360 FOR A FAMILY OF TWO, $30,648 FOR A FAMILY OF THREE, AND $36,924 A YEAR FOR A FAMILY $30,648 FOR A FAMILY OF THREE, AND $36,924 A YEAR FOR A FAMILY OF FOUR.

AND $36,924 A YEAR FOR A FAMILY OF FOUR.

JENNIFER USED TANF OR TEMPORARY OF FOUR.

JENNIFER USED TANF OR TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE TO RECEIVE FINANCIAL JENNIFER USED TANF OR TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE TO RECEIVE FINANCIAL HELP AFTER HER FIRST CHILD WAS ASSISTANCE TO RECEIVE FINANCIAL HELP AFTER HER FIRST CHILD WAS BORN.

HELP AFTER HER FIRST CHILD WAS BORN.

>> IT WAS LIKE A CHILD SUPPORT BORN.

>> IT WAS LIKE A CHILD SUPPORT CHECK, IF YOU WILL, AND FOOD >> IT WAS LIKE A CHILD SUPPORT CHECK, IF YOU WILL, AND FOOD STAMPS.

CHECK, IF YOU WILL, AND FOOD STAMPS.

I EVEN GOT DAYCARE ASSISTANCE STAMPS.

I EVEN GOT DAYCARE ASSISTANCE BUT THE WAY THE CO-PAYS OR I EVEN GOT DAYCARE ASSISTANCE BUT THE WAY THE CO-PAYS OR WHATEVER WORKED WITH DAYCARE, I BUT THE WAY THE CO-PAYS OR WHATEVER WORKED WITH DAYCARE, I STILL COULDN'T AFFORD DAYCARE.

WHATEVER WORKED WITH DAYCARE, I STILL COULDN'T AFFORD DAYCARE.

THE HELP WAS SHORT LIVED.

STILL COULDN'T AFFORD DAYCARE.

THE HELP WAS SHORT LIVED.

JENNIFER GOT A JOB.

THE HELP WAS SHORT LIVED.

JENNIFER GOT A JOB.

SHE NO LONGER QUALIFIED FOR JENNIFER GOT A JOB.

SHE NO LONGER QUALIFIED FOR ASSISTANCE.

SHE NO LONGER QUALIFIED FOR ASSISTANCE.

>> THERE WERE TIMES THAT I ASSISTANCE.

>> THERE WERE TIMES THAT I COULDN'T PAY MY GAS BILL.

>> THERE WERE TIMES THAT I COULDN'T PAY MY GAS BILL.

I WOULD PUT HIS, WELL, MINE TOO, COULDN'T PAY MY GAS BILL.

I WOULD PUT HIS, WELL, MINE TOO, PUT HIS BOWLS OF WATER IN THE I WOULD PUT HIS, WELL, MINE TOO, PUT HIS BOWLS OF WATER IN THE MICROWAVE TO HEAT UP THE WATER PUT HIS BOWLS OF WATER IN THE MICROWAVE TO HEAT UP THE WATER WARM ENOUGH TO TAKE A BATH MICROWAVE TO HEAT UP THE WATER WARM ENOUGH TO TAKE A BATH BECAUSE I DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH WARM ENOUGH TO TAKE A BATH BECAUSE I DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY BILLS WITH.

BECAUSE I DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY BILLS WITH.

>> Reporter: ANOTHER AVAILABLE MONEY TO PAY BILLS WITH.

>> Reporter: ANOTHER AVAILABLE SERVICE IS CALLED SOON TO BE >> Reporter: ANOTHER AVAILABLE SERVICE IS CALLED SOON TO BE SOONER BENEFIT.

SERVICE IS CALLED SOON TO BE SOONER BENEFIT.

>> IT'S AVAILABLE TO THE SOONER BENEFIT.

>> IT'S AVAILABLE TO THE PREGNANT MOM.

>> IT'S AVAILABLE TO THE PREGNANT MOM.

THERE'S NO POSTPARTUM BENEFIT PREGNANT MOM.

THERE'S NO POSTPARTUM BENEFIT THERE.

THERE'S NO POSTPARTUM BENEFIT THERE.

>> Reporter: THE INCOME THERE.

>> Reporter: THE INCOME THRESHOLD IS HIGHER FOR THE >> Reporter: THE INCOME THRESHOLD IS HIGHER FOR THE CHILDREN'S PROGRAM.

THRESHOLD IS HIGHER FOR THE CHILDREN'S PROGRAM.

A FAMILY OF ONE CAN HAVE AN CHILDREN'S PROGRAM.

A FAMILY OF ONE CAN HAVE AN ANNUAL INCOME OF $28,560, THE A FAMILY OF ONE CAN HAVE AN ANNUAL INCOME OF $28,560, THE ANNUAL INCOME QUALIFICATION GOES ANNUAL INCOME OF $28,560, THE ANNUAL INCOME QUALIFICATION GOES UP ROUGHLY $10,000 FOR EVERY ANNUAL INCOME QUALIFICATION GOES UP ROUGHLY $10,000 FOR EVERY ADDITIONAL PERSON IN THE UP ROUGHLY $10,000 FOR EVERY ADDITIONAL PERSON IN THE HOUSEHOLD.

ADDITIONAL PERSON IN THE HOUSEHOLD.

WOMEN, GIRLS, AND FAMILIES FORK HOUSEHOLD.

WOMEN, GIRLS, AND FAMILIES FORK OVER BIG BUCKS DURING PREGNANCY WOMEN, GIRLS, AND FAMILIES FORK OVER BIG BUCKS DURING PREGNANCY AND DELIVERY.

OVER BIG BUCKS DURING PREGNANCY AND DELIVERY.

>> OUR BILL IS, YOU KNOW, IN THE AND DELIVERY.

>> OUR BILL IS, YOU KNOW, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF BETWEEN $2500 >> OUR BILL IS, YOU KNOW, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF BETWEEN $2500 JUST FOR THE DOCTOR CARE, THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF BETWEEN $2500 JUST FOR THE DOCTOR CARE, THE HOSPITAL.

JUST FOR THE DOCTOR CARE, THE HOSPITAL.

IT CAN EASILY BE 10,000.

HOSPITAL.

IT CAN EASILY BE 10,000.

SOMETIMES THERE ARE IT CAN EASILY BE 10,000.

SOMETIMES THERE ARE COMPLICATIONS.

SOMETIMES THERE ARE COMPLICATIONS.

WE HAVE OCCASIONAL PATIENTS WHO COMPLICATIONS.

WE HAVE OCCASIONAL PATIENTS WHO ARE IN THE HOSPITAL FOR EXTENDED WE HAVE OCCASIONAL PATIENTS WHO ARE IN THE HOSPITAL FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME WITH HEALTH ARE IN THE HOSPITAL FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME WITH HEALTH ISSUES OR PREGNANCY-RELATED PERIODS OF TIME WITH HEALTH ISSUES OR PREGNANCY-RELATED PROBLEMS.

ISSUES OR PREGNANCY-RELATED PROBLEMS.

>> WE USE NATIONALLY SET PROBLEMS.

>> WE USE NATIONALLY SET STANDARDS FOR COSTS.

>> WE USE NATIONALLY SET STANDARDS FOR COSTS.

NOW, I'M SURE A LOT OF OUR STANDARDS FOR COSTS.

NOW, I'M SURE A LOT OF OUR PROVIDERS PROBABLY HOPE IT WOULD NOW, I'M SURE A LOT OF OUR PROVIDERS PROBABLY HOPE IT WOULD BE A HIGHER REIMBURSEMENT BUT SO PROVIDERS PROBABLY HOPE IT WOULD BE A HIGHER REIMBURSEMENT BUT SO FAR IT'S BEEN ADEQUATE TO MAKE BE A HIGHER REIMBURSEMENT BUT SO FAR IT'S BEEN ADEQUATE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN ENSURE ACCESS FAR IT'S BEEN ADEQUATE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN ENSURE ACCESS TO THOSE SERVICES FOR ALL THE SURE THAT WE CAN ENSURE ACCESS TO THOSE SERVICES FOR ALL THE MOMS ON THE PROGRAM.

TO THOSE SERVICES FOR ALL THE MOMS ON THE PROGRAM.

>> Reporter: WHILE COSTS ARE A MOMS ON THE PROGRAM.

>> Reporter: WHILE COSTS ARE A WORRY FOR SOME, Dr. STONE, A >> Reporter: WHILE COSTS ARE A WORRY FOR SOME, Dr. STONE, A PRACTICING OB/GYN OF 25 YEARS, WORRY FOR SOME, Dr. STONE, A PRACTICING OB/GYN OF 25 YEARS, IS CONCERNED WITH WOMEN'S PRACTICING OB/GYN OF 25 YEARS, IS CONCERNED WITH WOMEN'S HEALTH.

IS CONCERNED WITH WOMEN'S HEALTH.

>> I DON'T THINK ANYBODY LIKES HEALTH.

>> I DON'T THINK ANYBODY LIKES THE IDEA OF THEIR DOCTOR'S >> I DON'T THINK ANYBODY LIKES THE IDEA OF THEIR DOCTOR'S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS BEING THE IDEA OF THEIR DOCTOR'S DECISION-MAKING PROCESS BEING INFLUENCED BY A 10-YEAR PRISON DECISION-MAKING PROCESS BEING INFLUENCED BY A 10-YEAR PRISON SENTENCE AND A $100,000 FINE TO INFLUENCED BY A 10-YEAR PRISON SENTENCE AND A $100,000 FINE TO TELL YOU WHAT YOUR MEDICAL SENTENCE AND A $100,000 FINE TO TELL YOU WHAT YOUR MEDICAL OPTIONS ARE.

TELL YOU WHAT YOUR MEDICAL OPTIONS ARE.

>> IF YOU WILL HOLD A WOMEN OPTIONS ARE.

>> IF YOU WILL HOLD A WOMEN LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT, A >> IF YOU WILL HOLD A WOMEN LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT, A MAN SHOULD BE JUST AS LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT, A MAN SHOULD BE JUST AS RESPONSIBLE.

MAN SHOULD BE JUST AS RESPONSIBLE.

>> Reporter: PRESIDENT BIDEN RESPONSIBLE.

>> Reporter: PRESIDENT BIDEN SIGNED AN ORDER AND DOES NOT >> Reporter: PRESIDENT BIDEN SIGNED AN ORDER AND DOES NOT SAFEGUARD ACCESS TO ABORTIONS SIGNED AN ORDER AND DOES NOT SAFEGUARD ACCESS TO ABORTIONS NATIONWIDE BUT DOES MITIGATE SAFEGUARD ACCESS TO ABORTIONS NATIONWIDE BUT DOES MITIGATE PENALTIES WOMEN COULD FACE WHEN NATIONWIDE BUT DOES MITIGATE PENALTIES WOMEN COULD FACE WHEN SEEKING AN ABORTION.

PENALTIES WOMEN COULD FACE WHEN SEEKING AN ABORTION.

>> KENNEDY, THANK YOU.

SEEKING AN ABORTION.

>> KENNEDY, THANK YOU.

THE SUPREME COURT WAS BUSY OVER >> KENNEDY, THANK YOU.

THE SUPREME COURT WAS BUSY OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF WEEKS ISSUING THE SUPREME COURT WAS BUSY OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF WEEKS ISSUING DECISIONS WHICH HAVE CHANGED THE PAST COUPLE OF WEEKS ISSUING DECISIONS WHICH HAVE CHANGED LIFE IN THE U.S. AND OKLAHOMA.

DECISIONS WHICH HAVE CHANGED LIFE IN THE U.S. AND OKLAHOMA.

COMING UP LATER IN THE SHOW, WE LIFE IN THE U.S. AND OKLAHOMA.

COMING UP LATER IN THE SHOW, WE TALK WITH LEGAL EXPERTS ON WHAT COMING UP LATER IN THE SHOW, WE TALK WITH LEGAL EXPERTS ON WHAT KINDS OF IMPACTS ARE EXPECTED TALK WITH LEGAL EXPERTS ON WHAT KINDS OF IMPACTS ARE EXPECTED FROM THOSE DECISIONS.

KINDS OF IMPACTS ARE EXPECTED FROM THOSE DECISIONS.

SO, CASTRO v. HERTA CHALLENGED FROM THOSE DECISIONS.

SO, CASTRO v. HERTA CHALLENGED THE PRECEDENCE, THAT THE FEDERAL SO, CASTRO v. HERTA CHALLENGED THE PRECEDENCE, THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROSECUTED CRIMES THE PRECEDENCE, THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROSECUTED CRIMES COMMITTED BY A NON-INDIAN ON GOVERNMENT PROSECUTED CRIMES COMMITTED BY A NON-INDIAN ON FEDERAL LANDS.

COMMITTED BY A NON-INDIAN ON FEDERAL LANDS.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ONLY HAS FEDERAL LANDS.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ONLY HAS JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE CRIMES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ONLY HAS JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE CRIMES ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE CRIMES ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

CONTRACEPTION IS ALREADY UNDER ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

CONTRACEPTION IS ALREADY UNDER ATTACK PERHAPS ACCIDENTALLY CONTRACEPTION IS ALREADY UNDER ATTACK PERHAPS ACCIDENTALLY BECAUSE THERE ARE STATES ATTACK PERHAPS ACCIDENTALLY BECAUSE THERE ARE STATES DEFINING ABORTION AS ANYTHING BECAUSE THERE ARE STATES DEFINING ABORTION AS ANYTHING THAT TERMINATES A PREGNANCY AND DEFINING ABORTION AS ANYTHING THAT TERMINATES A PREGNANCY AND PREGNANCY BEGINS AT CONCEPTION, THAT TERMINATES A PREGNANCY AND PREGNANCY BEGINS AT CONCEPTION, BUT A LOT OF COMMON FORMS OF PREGNANCY BEGINS AT CONCEPTION, BUT A LOT OF COMMON FORMS OF CONTRACEPTION PREVENT BUT A LOT OF COMMON FORMS OF CONTRACEPTION PREVENT IMPLANTATION OF AN EMBRYO, AND CONTRACEPTION PREVENT IMPLANTATION OF AN EMBRYO, AND THAT WOULD BE UNDER THESE IMPLANTATION OF AN EMBRYO, AND THAT WOULD BE UNDER THESE DEFINITIONS ABORTION.

THAT WOULD BE UNDER THESE DEFINITIONS ABORTION.

>> MORE FROM OUR EXPERTS AND DEFINITIONS ABORTION.

>> MORE FROM OUR EXPERTS AND MODERATOR SUSAN CADOT DURING OUR >> MORE FROM OUR EXPERTS AND MODERATOR SUSAN CADOT DURING OUR IN-DEPTH SEGMENT LATER.

MODERATOR SUSAN CADOT DURING OUR IN-DEPTH SEGMENT LATER.

ON JUNE 1st, A GUNMAN IN TULSA IN-DEPTH SEGMENT LATER.

ON JUNE 1st, A GUNMAN IN TULSA TOOK THE LIVES OF FOUR PEOPLE AT ON JUNE 1st, A GUNMAN IN TULSA TOOK THE LIVES OF FOUR PEOPLE AT ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL BEFORE TOOK THE LIVES OF FOUR PEOPLE AT ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL BEFORE KILLING HIMSELF, A HORRIFIC ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL BEFORE KILLING HIMSELF, A HORRIFIC EXAMPLE OF WHAT IS A TREND, KILLING HIMSELF, A HORRIFIC EXAMPLE OF WHAT IS A TREND, THREATS OR VIOLENCE AGAINST EXAMPLE OF WHAT IS A TREND, THREATS OR VIOLENCE AGAINST HOSPITAL WORKERS.

THREATS OR VIOLENCE AGAINST HOSPITAL WORKERS.

TWO DOCTORS, A RECEPTIONIST AND HOSPITAL WORKERS.

TWO DOCTORS, A RECEPTIONIST AND A PATIENT DIED THAT DAY.

TWO DOCTORS, A RECEPTIONIST AND A PATIENT DIED THAT DAY.

SINCE THEN, MORE THREATS HAVE A PATIENT DIED THAT DAY.

SINCE THEN, MORE THREATS HAVE BEEN MADE AGAINST HOSPITAL SINCE THEN, MORE THREATS HAVE BEEN MADE AGAINST HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES IN TULSA.

BEEN MADE AGAINST HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES IN TULSA.

THIS WEEK, RICH LENZ SPOKE WITH EMPLOYEES IN TULSA.

THIS WEEK, RICH LENZ SPOKE WITH REPORTER CATHERINE SWEENEY WITH THIS WEEK, RICH LENZ SPOKE WITH REPORTER CATHERINE SWEENEY WITH OUR CONTENT PARTNER STATE IMPACT REPORTER CATHERINE SWEENEY WITH OUR CONTENT PARTNER STATE IMPACT OKLAHOMA TO LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR CONTENT PARTNER STATE IMPACT OKLAHOMA TO LEARN MORE ABOUT WORKPLACE IN HEALTHCARE OKLAHOMA TO LEARN MORE ABOUT WORKPLACE IN HEALTHCARE FACILITIES.

WORKPLACE IN HEALTHCARE FACILITIES.

CATHERINE, YOU WROTE ABOUT OTHER FACILITIES.

CATHERINE, YOU WROTE ABOUT OTHER THREATS FOLLOWING THE TULSA CATHERINE, YOU WROTE ABOUT OTHER THREATS FOLLOWING THE TULSA SHOOTING.

THREATS FOLLOWING THE TULSA SHOOTING.

CAN YOU GIVE US SOME SPECIFICS SHOOTING.

CAN YOU GIVE US SOME SPECIFICS ON THAT?

CAN YOU GIVE US SOME SPECIFICS ON THAT?

>> ONE PERSON CALLED THEIR ON THAT?

>> ONE PERSON CALLED THEIR DOCTOR AND SAID HE WAS GOING TO >> ONE PERSON CALLED THEIR DOCTOR AND SAID HE WAS GOING TO SHOOT HIM AND HIS OTHER DOCTOR DOCTOR AND SAID HE WAS GOING TO SHOOT HIM AND HIS OTHER DOCTOR AND ANYBODY HE RAN INTO ON THE SHOOT HIM AND HIS OTHER DOCTOR AND ANYBODY HE RAN INTO ON THE WAY.

AND ANYBODY HE RAN INTO ON THE WAY.

ANOTHER MAN AT A HOSPITAL WAS WAY.

ANOTHER MAN AT A HOSPITAL WAS ANGRY ABOUT THE FOOD HE GOT AND ANOTHER MAN AT A HOSPITAL WAS ANGRY ABOUT THE FOOD HE GOT AND SAID HE WAS GOING TO SHOOT ANGRY ABOUT THE FOOD HE GOT AND SAID HE WAS GOING TO SHOOT WHOEVER MADE IT.

SAID HE WAS GOING TO SHOOT WHOEVER MADE IT.

UM, THIS SAME MAN THREATENED TO WHOEVER MADE IT.

UM, THIS SAME MAN THREATENED TO SHOOT WHOEVER LOST HIS GLASSES UM, THIS SAME MAN THREATENED TO SHOOT WHOEVER LOST HIS GLASSES WHILE HE WAS THERE.

SHOOT WHOEVER LOST HIS GLASSES WHILE HE WAS THERE.

UM, BUT ST. FRANCIS, ST. JOHN, WHILE HE WAS THERE.

UM, BUT ST. FRANCIS, ST. JOHN, HILLCREST, EACH OF THEM HAVE UM, BUT ST. FRANCIS, ST. JOHN, HILLCREST, EACH OF THEM HAVE GOTTEN THREATS OF SHOOTINGS.

HILLCREST, EACH OF THEM HAVE GOTTEN THREATS OF SHOOTINGS.

>> THANKFULLY, THOSE WERE ONLY GOTTEN THREATS OF SHOOTINGS.

>> THANKFULLY, THOSE WERE ONLY THREATS, BUT HOSPITALS MAY BE >> THANKFULLY, THOSE WERE ONLY THREATS, BUT HOSPITALS MAY BE THE ULTIMATE SOFT TARGET.

THREATS, BUT HOSPITALS MAY BE THE ULTIMATE SOFT TARGET.

EXPLAIN THAT.

THE ULTIMATE SOFT TARGET.

EXPLAIN THAT.

>> THERE ARE SO MANY ENTRANCES EXPLAIN THAT.

>> THERE ARE SO MANY ENTRANCES IN HOSPITALS, AND THERE ARE >> THERE ARE SO MANY ENTRANCES IN HOSPITALS, AND THERE ARE STAIRWELLS WHERE PEOPLE CAN IN HOSPITALS, AND THERE ARE STAIRWELLS WHERE PEOPLE CAN HIDE, AND THEY ARE JUST REALLY STAIRWELLS WHERE PEOPLE CAN HIDE, AND THEY ARE JUST REALLY LAID IN AND OUT A WAY THAT IT'S HIDE, AND THEY ARE JUST REALLY LAID IN AND OUT A WAY THAT IT'S HARD TO SECURE THEM.

LAID IN AND OUT A WAY THAT IT'S HARD TO SECURE THEM.

>> IN ADDITION TO THAT, OF HARD TO SECURE THEM.

>> IN ADDITION TO THAT, OF COURSE, THE OBVIOUS, DOCTORS AND >> IN ADDITION TO THAT, OF COURSE, THE OBVIOUS, DOCTORS AND NURSES ARE FACING PEOPLE WHO ARE COURSE, THE OBVIOUS, DOCTORS AND NURSES ARE FACING PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT WELL PERHAPS PHYSICALLY AND NURSES ARE FACING PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT WELL PERHAPS PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY.

NOT WELL PERHAPS PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY.

>> ESPECIALLY IN AN ER.

MENTALLY.

>> ESPECIALLY IN AN ER.

PEOPLE CAN COME IN AFTER A >> ESPECIALLY IN AN ER.

PEOPLE CAN COME IN AFTER A TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND PEOPLE CAN COME IN AFTER A TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND ACTING SO DIFFERENT FROM HOW TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND ACTING SO DIFFERENT FROM HOW THEY USUALLY WOULD OR AFTER A ACTING SO DIFFERENT FROM HOW THEY USUALLY WOULD OR AFTER A BAD DRUG INTERACTION.

THEY USUALLY WOULD OR AFTER A BAD DRUG INTERACTION.

PEOPLE CAN COME IN WITH A BAD DRUG INTERACTION.

PEOPLE CAN COME IN WITH A PERSONALITY THAT'S ALTERED AND PEOPLE CAN COME IN WITH A PERSONALITY THAT'S ALTERED AND THEY CAN BE A LOT MORE PERSONALITY THAT'S ALTERED AND THEY CAN BE A LOT MORE AGGRESSIVE.

THEY CAN BE A LOT MORE AGGRESSIVE.

YOU'RE SEEING THE PATIENT AND AGGRESSIVE.

YOU'RE SEEING THE PATIENT AND THEIR FAMILY KIND OF IN THE MOST YOU'RE SEEING THE PATIENT AND THEIR FAMILY KIND OF IN THE MOST VULNERABLE SITUATION THEY'LL THEIR FAMILY KIND OF IN THE MOST VULNERABLE SITUATION THEY'LL EVER BE IN.

VULNERABLE SITUATION THEY'LL EVER BE IN.

SO, THE TENSIONS ARE VERY HIGH.

EVER BE IN.

SO, THE TENSIONS ARE VERY HIGH.

ALSO, YEAH, THEY COULD BE HAVING SO, THE TENSIONS ARE VERY HIGH.

ALSO, YEAH, THEY COULD BE HAVING A MEDICAL CONDITION THAT MAKE ALSO, YEAH, THEY COULD BE HAVING A MEDICAL CONDITION THAT MAKE THEM ACT DIFFICULT -- A MEDICAL CONDITION THAT MAKE THEM ACT DIFFICULT -- DIFFERENTLY THAN THEY USUALLY THEM ACT DIFFICULT -- DIFFERENTLY THAN THEY USUALLY WOULD.

DIFFERENTLY THAN THEY USUALLY WOULD.

>> IS THIS HAPPENING ALL ACROSS WOULD.

>> IS THIS HAPPENING ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY?

>> IS THIS HAPPENING ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY?

IS THE PROBLEM GROWING?

THE COUNTRY?

IS THE PROBLEM GROWING?

>> WE KNOW THAT HOSPITAL WORKERS IS THE PROBLEM GROWING?

>> WE KNOW THAT HOSPITAL WORKERS AND HEALTH WORKERS GENERALLY >> WE KNOW THAT HOSPITAL WORKERS AND HEALTH WORKERS GENERALLY ALREADY FACE VIOLENCE AT THE AND HEALTH WORKERS GENERALLY ALREADY FACE VIOLENCE AT THE WORKPLACE AT A RATE THAT'S SIX ALREADY FACE VIOLENCE AT THE WORKPLACE AT A RATE THAT'S SIX TIMES HIGHER THAN THE GENERAL WORKPLACE AT A RATE THAT'S SIX TIMES HIGHER THAN THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

TIMES HIGHER THAN THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

UM, BUT IT DID GET WORSE.

PUBLIC.

UM, BUT IT DID GET WORSE.

AND SO THAT STUDY FOUND OF UM, BUT IT DID GET WORSE.

AND SO THAT STUDY FOUND OF NURSES WHO WORK IN HOSPITALS, AND SO THAT STUDY FOUND OF NURSES WHO WORK IN HOSPITALS, THEY SURVEYED HUNDREDS OF THEM, NURSES WHO WORK IN HOSPITALS, THEY SURVEYED HUNDREDS OF THEM, 44% HAD EXPERIENCED WORKPLACE THEY SURVEYED HUNDREDS OF THEM, 44% HAD EXPERIENCED WORKPLACE VIOLENCE, PHYSICAL VIOLENCE, UM, 44% HAD EXPERIENCED WORKPLACE VIOLENCE, PHYSICAL VIOLENCE, UM, MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS HAD VIOLENCE, PHYSICAL VIOLENCE, UM, MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS HAD EXPERIENCED VERBAL ABUSE, BUT MORE THAN TWO-THIRDS HAD EXPERIENCED VERBAL ABUSE, BUT 44% HAD EXPERIENCED PHYSICAL EXPERIENCED VERBAL ABUSE, BUT 44% HAD EXPERIENCED PHYSICAL VIOLENCE ON THE JOB.

44% HAD EXPERIENCED PHYSICAL VIOLENCE ON THE JOB.

>> CATHERINE, THOSE NUMBERS ARE VIOLENCE ON THE JOB.

>> CATHERINE, THOSE NUMBERS ARE VERY DISTURBING.

>> CATHERINE, THOSE NUMBERS ARE VERY DISTURBING.

NOW, WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT VERY DISTURBING.

NOW, WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT PATIENTS HEADING INTO HOSPITALS, NOW, WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT PATIENTS HEADING INTO HOSPITALS, BUT, ALSO, WHAT ABOUT HEALTHCARE PATIENTS HEADING INTO HOSPITALS, BUT, ALSO, WHAT ABOUT HEALTHCARE WORKERS WHO HAVE TO HEAD INTO A BUT, ALSO, WHAT ABOUT HEALTHCARE WORKERS WHO HAVE TO HEAD INTO A HOME, A PRIVATE HOME, THAT CAN WORKERS WHO HAVE TO HEAD INTO A HOME, A PRIVATE HOME, THAT CAN BE DANGEROUS, TOO.

HOME, A PRIVATE HOME, THAT CAN BE DANGEROUS, TOO.

>> I TALKED WITH A HOSPICE BE DANGEROUS, TOO.

>> I TALKED WITH A HOSPICE SOCIAL WORKER, AND SHE KIND OF >> I TALKED WITH A HOSPICE SOCIAL WORKER, AND SHE KIND OF TALKED ABOUT THE STRESSES OF SOCIAL WORKER, AND SHE KIND OF TALKED ABOUT THE STRESSES OF GOING INTO A PERSON'S HOME TALKED ABOUT THE STRESSES OF GOING INTO A PERSON'S HOME BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW IF THEY GOING INTO A PERSON'S HOME BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE A FIREARM OR ANOTHER BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE A FIREARM OR ANOTHER WEAPON, AND YOU'RE ON THEIR HAVE A FIREARM OR ANOTHER WEAPON, AND YOU'RE ON THEIR TURF.

WEAPON, AND YOU'RE ON THEIR TURF.

SHE SAID DURING THESE REALLY BAD TURF.

SHE SAID DURING THESE REALLY BAD SURGES WHERE A LOT OF PEOPLE SHE SAID DURING THESE REALLY BAD SURGES WHERE A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE PACKING THE HOSPITALS UM, SURGES WHERE A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE PACKING THE HOSPITALS UM, YOU KNOW, THERE WERE SHORJS OF WERE PACKING THE HOSPITALS UM, YOU KNOW, THERE WERE SHORJS OF WORKERS, THERE WERE SHORTAGES OF YOU KNOW, THERE WERE SHORJS OF WORKERS, THERE WERE SHORTAGES OF DOCTORS, HOSPITALS WERE PAST WORKERS, THERE WERE SHORTAGES OF DOCTORS, HOSPITALS WERE PAST CAPACITY.

DOCTORS, HOSPITALS WERE PAST CAPACITY.

IT WAS JUST A REALLY HARD TIME CAPACITY.

IT WAS JUST A REALLY HARD TIME TO DELIVER CARE.

IT WAS JUST A REALLY HARD TIME TO DELIVER CARE.

SO, PATIENTS SOMETIMES WERE NOT TO DELIVER CARE.

SO, PATIENTS SOMETIMES WERE NOT GETTING AS MUCH FACE TIME WITH SO, PATIENTS SOMETIMES WERE NOT GETTING AS MUCH FACE TIME WITH THEIR DOCTORS AS THEY USUALLY GETTING AS MUCH FACE TIME WITH THEIR DOCTORS AS THEY USUALLY WOULD, AND THEY WOULD HAVE THEIR DOCTORS AS THEY USUALLY WOULD, AND THEY WOULD HAVE TERMINAL CANCER AND NOT BE SUPER WOULD, AND THEY WOULD HAVE TERMINAL CANCER AND NOT BE SUPER CLEAR ON THAT UNTIL A HOSPICE TERMINAL CANCER AND NOT BE SUPER CLEAR ON THAT UNTIL A HOSPICE WORKER WOULD SHOW AND SAY I AM CLEAR ON THAT UNTIL A HOSPICE WORKER WOULD SHOW AND SAY I AM HERE BECAUSE YOUR FAMILY MEMBER WORKER WOULD SHOW AND SAY I AM HERE BECAUSE YOUR FAMILY MEMBER ONLY HAS A FEW WEEKS LEFT TO HERE BECAUSE YOUR FAMILY MEMBER ONLY HAS A FEW WEEKS LEFT TO LIVE AND FINDING THAT OUT CAN BE ONLY HAS A FEW WEEKS LEFT TO LIVE AND FINDING THAT OUT CAN BE VERY EMOTIONALLY CHARGED.

LIVE AND FINDING THAT OUT CAN BE VERY EMOTIONALLY CHARGED.

>> CATHERINE, BACK TO THE VERY EMOTIONALLY CHARGED.

>> CATHERINE, BACK TO THE HOSPITALS, ARMED GUARDS, METAL >> CATHERINE, BACK TO THE HOSPITALS, ARMED GUARDS, METAL DETECTORS IS THAT THE ANSWER?

HOSPITALS, ARMED GUARDS, METAL DETECTORS IS THAT THE ANSWER?

IS THAT FEASIBLE?

DETECTORS IS THAT THE ANSWER?

IS THAT FEASIBLE?

>> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO TALK IS THAT FEASIBLE?

>> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO TALK ABOUT PHYSICAL SECURITY, ARMED >> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO TALK ABOUT PHYSICAL SECURITY, ARMED GUARDS, METAL DETECTORS, UM, ABOUT PHYSICAL SECURITY, ARMED GUARDS, METAL DETECTORS, UM, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO TALK ABOUT GUARDS, METAL DETECTORS, UM, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO TALK ABOUT JUST, LIKE, WORKFORCE TRAINING, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO TALK ABOUT JUST, LIKE, WORKFORCE TRAINING, UM, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE JUST, LIKE, WORKFORCE TRAINING, UM, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE ORGANIZATIONS THAT DO ADVOCATE UM, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE ORGANIZATIONS THAT DO ADVOCATE FOR STRICTER GUN LAWS.

ORGANIZATIONS THAT DO ADVOCATE FOR STRICTER GUN LAWS.

OKLAHOMA HAS ALREADY ADOPTED A FOR STRICTER GUN LAWS.

OKLAHOMA HAS ALREADY ADOPTED A LAW THAT FURTHER PUNISHES PEOPLE OKLAHOMA HAS ALREADY ADOPTED A LAW THAT FURTHER PUNISHES PEOPLE WHO DO ASSAULT HEALTH WORKERS.

LAW THAT FURTHER PUNISHES PEOPLE WHO DO ASSAULT HEALTH WORKERS.

SO, IT WAS LIFTED UP TO A FELONY WHO DO ASSAULT HEALTH WORKERS.

SO, IT WAS LIFTED UP TO A FELONY AND THEN, YOU KNOW, THE MAXIMUM SO, IT WAS LIFTED UP TO A FELONY AND THEN, YOU KNOW, THE MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT WAS LIFTED UP TO 10 AND THEN, YOU KNOW, THE MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT WAS LIFTED UP TO 10 YEARS.

PUNISHMENT WAS LIFTED UP TO 10 YEARS.

THERE IS A MOVEMENT TRYING TO YEARS.

THERE IS A MOVEMENT TRYING TO PUSH FOR LAWS LIKE THAT TO THERE IS A MOVEMENT TRYING TO PUSH FOR LAWS LIKE THAT TO PROTECT HEALTH WORKERS.

PUSH FOR LAWS LIKE THAT TO PROTECT HEALTH WORKERS.

THERE'S NOT ONE SOLUTION THAT PROTECT HEALTH WORKERS.

THERE'S NOT ONE SOLUTION THAT COULD FIX THE WHOLE PROBLEM.

THERE'S NOT ONE SOLUTION THAT COULD FIX THE WHOLE PROBLEM.

IT'S JUST A VERY TOUGH ISSUE.

COULD FIX THE WHOLE PROBLEM.

IT'S JUST A VERY TOUGH ISSUE.

>> CATHERINE SWEENEY WITH STATE IT'S JUST A VERY TOUGH ISSUE.

>> CATHERINE SWEENEY WITH STATE IMPACT OKLAHOMA, THANKS, AGAIN, >> CATHERINE SWEENEY WITH STATE IMPACT OKLAHOMA, THANKS, AGAIN, SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

IMPACT OKLAHOMA, THANKS, AGAIN, SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

>> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.

SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

>> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.

>> WHEN THE NEWS BROKE THAT >> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.

>> WHEN THE NEWS BROKE THAT CONSTRUCTION ON THE CANOO >> WHEN THE NEWS BROKE THAT CONSTRUCTION ON THE CANOO ELECTRIC VEHICLE FACTORY IN PRY CONSTRUCTION ON THE CANOO ELECTRIC VEHICLE FACTORY IN PRY OR, OKLAHOMA WAS BEING DELAYED, ELECTRIC VEHICLE FACTORY IN PRY OR, OKLAHOMA WAS BEING DELAYED, IT CAUSED QUITE A STIR, BECAUSE OR, OKLAHOMA WAS BEING DELAYED, IT CAUSED QUITE A STIR, BECAUSE THE STATE HAS INVESTED MILLIONS IT CAUSED QUITE A STIR, BECAUSE THE STATE HAS INVESTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE PROJECT THE STATE HAS INVESTED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE PROJECT ALREADY WITH MILLIONS MORE IN OF DOLLARS IN THE PROJECT ALREADY WITH MILLIONS MORE IN INCENTIVES ON THE LINE.

ALREADY WITH MILLIONS MORE IN INCENTIVES ON THE LINE.

HOWEVER, THE MAJOR STAKEHOLDERS INCENTIVES ON THE LINE.

HOWEVER, THE MAJOR STAKEHOLDERS IN THE PROJECT INSIST THE DELAY HOWEVER, THE MAJOR STAKEHOLDERS IN THE PROJECT INSIST THE DELAY IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.

IN THE PROJECT INSIST THE DELAY IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.

IT'S EXPECTED TO LAST SIX MONTHS IS MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.

IT'S EXPECTED TO LAST SIX MONTHS TO A YEAR, AND WHEN WE SPOKE TO IT'S EXPECTED TO LAST SIX MONTHS TO A YEAR, AND WHEN WE SPOKE TO CANOO'S CEO AND CHAIRMAN LAST TO A YEAR, AND WHEN WE SPOKE TO CANOO'S CEO AND CHAIRMAN LAST APRIL, THAT SEEMS TO FIT HIS CANOO'S CEO AND CHAIRMAN LAST APRIL, THAT SEEMS TO FIT HIS TIMELINE AS WELL.

APRIL, THAT SEEMS TO FIT HIS TIMELINE AS WELL.

>> SO, YOU KNOW, ORIGINALLY, WE TIMELINE AS WELL.

>> SO, YOU KNOW, ORIGINALLY, WE WERE HOPING FOR END OF '23, BUT >> SO, YOU KNOW, ORIGINALLY, WE WERE HOPING FOR END OF '23, BUT WE'RE THINKING NOW, JUST WITH WERE HOPING FOR END OF '23, BUT WE'RE THINKING NOW, JUST WITH MATERIAL, SUPPLY-CHAIN STUFF, WE'RE THINKING NOW, JUST WITH MATERIAL, SUPPLY-CHAIN STUFF, EARLY '24 IS THE FIRST MATERIAL, SUPPLY-CHAIN STUFF, EARLY '24 IS THE FIRST PRODUCTION COMING OUT OF EARLY '24 IS THE FIRST PRODUCTION COMING OUT OF BENTONVILLE AND THEN THE LARGER PRODUCTION COMING OUT OF BENTONVILLE AND THEN THE LARGER PRODUCTION LINE COMES UP HERE IN BENTONVILLE AND THEN THE LARGER PRODUCTION LINE COMES UP HERE IN PRODUCTION LINE COMES UP HERE IN PRYOR.

PRYOR.

TULSA RECEIVED A STATEMENT FROM PRYOR.

TULSA RECEIVED A STATEMENT FROM A CANOO SPOKESPERSON ON FRIDAY.

TULSA RECEIVED A STATEMENT FROM A CANOO SPOKESPERSON ON FRIDAY.

WE ARE FACING THE SAME A CANOO SPOKESPERSON ON FRIDAY.

WE ARE FACING THE SAME CHALLENGES EVERYONE IN AMERICA WE ARE FACING THE SAME CHALLENGES EVERYONE IN AMERICA IS FACING.

CHALLENGES EVERYONE IN AMERICA IS FACING.

AS FOR THE MONEY INVESTED BY THE IS FACING.

AS FOR THE MONEY INVESTED BY THE STATE, CANOO WAS AWARDED A $15 AS FOR THE MONEY INVESTED BY THE STATE, CANOO WAS AWARDED A $15 MILLION.

STATE, CANOO WAS AWARDED A $15 MILLION.

THE LARGEST SINGLE AMOUNT THE MILLION.

THE LARGEST SINGLE AMOUNT THE STATE HAS HANDED OUT SINCE THE THE LARGEST SINGLE AMOUNT THE STATE HAS HANDED OUT SINCE THE FUND WAS CREATED MORE THAN A STATE HAS HANDED OUT SINCE THE FUND WAS CREATED MORE THAN A DECADE AGO.

FUND WAS CREATED MORE THAN A DECADE AGO.

AND, THE COMPANY CAN POTENTIALLY DECADE AGO.

AND, THE COMPANY CAN POTENTIALLY RECEIVE $300 MILLION MORE IN AND, THE COMPANY CAN POTENTIALLY RECEIVE $300 MILLION MORE IN STATE INCENTIVES IF AND WHEN THE RECEIVE $300 MILLION MORE IN STATE INCENTIVES IF AND WHEN THE FACTORY'S BUILT AND THE REQUIRED STATE INCENTIVES IF AND WHEN THE FACTORY'S BUILT AND THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF JOBS ARE CREATED.

FACTORY'S BUILT AND THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF JOBS ARE CREATED.

THE OKLAHOMA COMMERCE DEPARTMENT NUMBER OF JOBS ARE CREATED.

THE OKLAHOMA COMMERCE DEPARTMENT RELEASED A SHORT STATEMENT ON THE OKLAHOMA COMMERCE DEPARTMENT RELEASED A SHORT STATEMENT ON THIS DEVELOPMENT THAT READS...

RELEASED A SHORT STATEMENT ON THIS DEVELOPMENT THAT READS... OF COURSE, DOZENS OF ELECTRIC THIS DEVELOPMENT THAT READS... OF COURSE, DOZENS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE OPTIONS ARE ALREADY ON OF COURSE, DOZENS OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE OPTIONS ARE ALREADY ON THE MARKET IN OKLAHOMA.

VEHICLE OPTIONS ARE ALREADY ON THE MARKET IN OKLAHOMA.

SALES ARE INCREASING, BUT TRAIL THE MARKET IN OKLAHOMA.

SALES ARE INCREASING, BUT TRAIL FAR BEHIND GAS-POWERED CARS FOR SALES ARE INCREASING, BUT TRAIL FAR BEHIND GAS-POWERED CARS FOR ONE SIMPLE REASON, THEY REMAIN FAR BEHIND GAS-POWERED CARS FOR ONE SIMPLE REASON, THEY REMAIN TOO EXPENSIVE FOR MOST CAR ONE SIMPLE REASON, THEY REMAIN TOO EXPENSIVE FOR MOST CAR BUYERS.

TOO EXPENSIVE FOR MOST CAR BUYERS.

HOWEVER, MORE OKLAHOMANS ARE BUYERS.

HOWEVER, MORE OKLAHOMANS ARE GIVING EVs A SECOND LOOK.

HOWEVER, MORE OKLAHOMANS ARE GIVING EVs A SECOND LOOK.

STEVE SHAW IS LOOKING INTO THAT GIVING EVs A SECOND LOOK.

STEVE SHAW IS LOOKING INTO THAT STORY.

STEVE SHAW IS LOOKING INTO THAT STORY.

>> JASON, A DECADE OR SO AGO, IF STORY.

>> JASON, A DECADE OR SO AGO, IF YOU TOLD SOMEONE YOU WERE >> JASON, A DECADE OR SO AGO, IF YOU TOLD SOMEONE YOU WERE CONSIDERING BUYING AN ELECTRIC YOU TOLD SOMEONE YOU WERE CONSIDERING BUYING AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE, OR EV, THERE WOULD HAVE CONSIDERING BUYING AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE, OR EV, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A FEW SNICKERS IN THE ROOM.

VEHICLE, OR EV, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A FEW SNICKERS IN THE ROOM.

NOT ANY MORE.

BEEN A FEW SNICKERS IN THE ROOM.

NOT ANY MORE.

>> MY NEXT VEHICLE WILL BE A NOT ANY MORE.

>> MY NEXT VEHICLE WILL BE A PLUG-IN, ALL-ELECTRIC OR PLUG-IN >> MY NEXT VEHICLE WILL BE A PLUG-IN, ALL-ELECTRIC OR PLUG-IN HYBRID.

PLUG-IN, ALL-ELECTRIC OR PLUG-IN HYBRID.

TONY SMITH TEACHES ECONOMICS AT HYBRID.

TONY SMITH TEACHES ECONOMICS AT OKLAHOMA STATE'S OKLAHOMA CITY TONY SMITH TEACHES ECONOMICS AT OKLAHOMA STATE'S OKLAHOMA CITY CAMPUS.

OKLAHOMA STATE'S OKLAHOMA CITY CAMPUS.

SIX YEARS AGO, SMITH DID SOME CAMPUS.

SIX YEARS AGO, SMITH DID SOME RESEARCH.

SIX YEARS AGO, SMITH DID SOME RESEARCH.

AFTER ALL, HE'S A Ph.D. RESEARCH.

AFTER ALL, HE'S A Ph.D. THEN HE PLUNKED DOWN $8400 FOR AFTER ALL, HE'S A Ph.D. THEN HE PLUNKED DOWN $8400 FOR THIS 2012 NISSAN LEAF, WHICH THEN HE PLUNKED DOWN $8400 FOR THIS 2012 NISSAN LEAF, WHICH ALREADY HAD ABOUT 25,000 MILES.

THIS 2012 NISSAN LEAF, WHICH ALREADY HAD ABOUT 25,000 MILES.

>> IT'S PRACTICAL AND ALL THAT, ALREADY HAD ABOUT 25,000 MILES.

>> IT'S PRACTICAL AND ALL THAT, BUT IT'S SO FUN TO DRIVE.

>> IT'S PRACTICAL AND ALL THAT, BUT IT'S SO FUN TO DRIVE.

>> Reporter: IT'S FULLY ELECTRIC BUT IT'S SO FUN TO DRIVE.

>> Reporter: IT'S FULLY ELECTRIC AND STILL HAS SOME GIDDYUP.

>> Reporter: IT'S FULLY ELECTRIC AND STILL HAS SOME GIDDYUP.

>> I'M DRIVING IT FOR FREE NOW, AND STILL HAS SOME GIDDYUP.

>> I'M DRIVING IT FOR FREE NOW, ALL THE SAVINGS I HAVE.

>> I'M DRIVING IT FOR FREE NOW, ALL THE SAVINGS I HAVE.

I SAVE ABOUT 1300, 1400 A YEAR ALL THE SAVINGS I HAVE.

I SAVE ABOUT 1300, 1400 A YEAR ON FUEL AND MAINTENANCE.

I SAVE ABOUT 1300, 1400 A YEAR ON FUEL AND MAINTENANCE.

>> Reporter: SMITH SAYS IN THE ON FUEL AND MAINTENANCE.

>> Reporter: SMITH SAYS IN THE PAST SIX YEARS, ALL HE'S DONE >> Reporter: SMITH SAYS IN THE PAST SIX YEARS, ALL HE'S DONE FOR MAINTENANCE IS REPLACE PAST SIX YEARS, ALL HE'S DONE FOR MAINTENANCE IS REPLACE WINDSHIELD WIPER FLUID.

FOR MAINTENANCE IS REPLACE WINDSHIELD WIPER FLUID.

THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS, AND HE WINDSHIELD WIPER FLUID.

THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS, AND HE BOUGHT A NEW SET OF TIRES.

THE WINDSHIELD WIPERS, AND HE BOUGHT A NEW SET OF TIRES.

I PAY ABOUT $10 TO $12 A MONTH BOUGHT A NEW SET OF TIRES.

I PAY ABOUT $10 TO $12 A MONTH IN ELECTRIC DEPENDING ON HOW I PAY ABOUT $10 TO $12 A MONTH IN ELECTRIC DEPENDING ON HOW MUCH IT IS AND THAT'S IT.

IN ELECTRIC DEPENDING ON HOW MUCH IT IS AND THAT'S IT.

>> Reporter: SMITH SAYS A YEAR MUCH IT IS AND THAT'S IT.

>> Reporter: SMITH SAYS A YEAR AFTER HE BOUGHT IT, THOUGH, HE >> Reporter: SMITH SAYS A YEAR AFTER HE BOUGHT IT, THOUGH, HE DID HAVE TO REPLACE THE BATTERY AFTER HE BOUGHT IT, THOUGH, HE DID HAVE TO REPLACE THE BATTERY IN HIS NISSAN LEAF.

DID HAVE TO REPLACE THE BATTERY IN HIS NISSAN LEAF.

THAT BATTERY IS THE ONLY IN HIS NISSAN LEAF.

THAT BATTERY IS THE ONLY POTENTIAL MONEY PIT WITH THESE THAT BATTERY IS THE ONLY POTENTIAL MONEY PIT WITH THESE THINGS, BUT BECAUSE HIS WAS POTENTIAL MONEY PIT WITH THESE THINGS, BUT BECAUSE HIS WAS STILL UNDER WARRANTY, THAT $7500 THINGS, BUT BECAUSE HIS WAS STILL UNDER WARRANTY, THAT $7500 REPLACEMENT BATTERY WAS FREE.

STILL UNDER WARRANTY, THAT $7500 REPLACEMENT BATTERY WAS FREE.

>> BATTERIES THAT ARE COMING ON REPLACEMENT BATTERY WAS FREE.

>> BATTERIES THAT ARE COMING ON TODAY HAVE MUCH BETTER THERMAL >> BATTERIES THAT ARE COMING ON TODAY HAVE MUCH BETTER THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS THAT KEEP THE TODAY HAVE MUCH BETTER THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS THAT KEEP THE HEAT DOWN.

MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS THAT KEEP THE HEAT DOWN.

TESLA DOES A GOOD JOB.

HEAT DOWN.

TESLA DOES A GOOD JOB.

SOME BATTERIES WILL GO 12, 15, TESLA DOES A GOOD JOB.

SOME BATTERIES WILL GO 12, 15, EVEN 20 YEARS.

SOME BATTERIES WILL GO 12, 15, EVEN 20 YEARS.

HE'S AN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF EVEN 20 YEARS.

HE'S AN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF EARNEST.

HE'S AN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF EARNEST.

HE BOUGHT A TESLA EV A YEAR AGO.

EARNEST.

HE BOUGHT A TESLA EV A YEAR AGO.

DO YOU LIKE IT?

HE BOUGHT A TESLA EV A YEAR AGO.

DO YOU LIKE IT?

>> YEAH, I LIKE IT, YEAH.

DO YOU LIKE IT?

>> YEAH, I LIKE IT, YEAH.

>> HE SAYS 10 OR 12 YEARS AGO A >> YEAH, I LIKE IT, YEAH.

>> HE SAYS 10 OR 12 YEARS AGO A FULLY CHARGED BATTERY IN AN EV >> HE SAYS 10 OR 12 YEARS AGO A FULLY CHARGED BATTERY IN AN EV WOULD GET YA ABOUT 75 MILES ON FULLY CHARGED BATTERY IN AN EV WOULD GET YA ABOUT 75 MILES ON THE ROAD.

WOULD GET YA ABOUT 75 MILES ON THE ROAD.

HE SAYS THE NEW BATTERY THE ROAD.

HE SAYS THE NEW BATTERY TECHNOLOGY GETS YOU 250 MILES ON HE SAYS THE NEW BATTERY TECHNOLOGY GETS YOU 250 MILES ON A FULLY CHARGED BATTERY.

TECHNOLOGY GETS YOU 250 MILES ON A FULLY CHARGED BATTERY.

>> IT'S A BIG JUMP, AND I A FULLY CHARGED BATTERY.

>> IT'S A BIG JUMP, AND I THINK -- I PERSONALLY WORK ON >> IT'S A BIG JUMP, AND I THINK -- I PERSONALLY WORK ON BATTERY TECHNOLOGY, HOW TO THINK -- I PERSONALLY WORK ON BATTERY TECHNOLOGY, HOW TO MANAGE THOSE BATTERIES IN ORDER BATTERY TECHNOLOGY, HOW TO MANAGE THOSE BATTERIES IN ORDER TO EXTEND THE LIFE IN ORDER TO MANAGE THOSE BATTERIES IN ORDER TO EXTEND THE LIFE IN ORDER TO SLOW DOWN THE DEGRADATION.

TO EXTEND THE LIFE IN ORDER TO SLOW DOWN THE DEGRADATION.

I CAN TELL YOU THAT, UM, IF YOU SLOW DOWN THE DEGRADATION.

I CAN TELL YOU THAT, UM, IF YOU DRIVE YOUR VEHICLE FOR 100,000 I CAN TELL YOU THAT, UM, IF YOU DRIVE YOUR VEHICLE FOR 100,000 MILES, YOUR BATTERY WILL GO DOWN DRIVE YOUR VEHICLE FOR 100,000 MILES, YOUR BATTERY WILL GO DOWN 10%.

MILES, YOUR BATTERY WILL GO DOWN 10%.

IT'S REALLY NOT A BIG 10%.

IT'S REALLY NOT A BIG DEGRADATION.

IT'S REALLY NOT A BIG DEGRADATION.

>> WHAT HE'S SAYING IS THAT THE DEGRADATION.

>> WHAT HE'S SAYING IS THAT THE NEW EV BATTERIES NOW LAST MUCH >> WHAT HE'S SAYING IS THAT THE NEW EV BATTERIES NOW LAST MUCH LONGER, WHICH MAKS EVs MUCH NEW EV BATTERIES NOW LAST MUCH LONGER, WHICH MAKS EVs MUCH MORE COST EFFICIENT.

LONGER, WHICH MAKS EVs MUCH MORE COST EFFICIENT.

SOMETHING ELSE THAT HAS TAMPED MORE COST EFFICIENT.

SOMETHING ELSE THAT HAS TAMPED DOWN DEMAND IS RANGE ANXIETY.

SOMETHING ELSE THAT HAS TAMPED DOWN DEMAND IS RANGE ANXIETY.

CONSUMERS WORRY ABOUT RUNNING DOWN DEMAND IS RANGE ANXIETY.

CONSUMERS WORRY ABOUT RUNNING OUT OF JUICE ON THE ROAD.

CONSUMERS WORRY ABOUT RUNNING OUT OF JUICE ON THE ROAD.

BUT THE SOONER STATE'S DONE MORE OUT OF JUICE ON THE ROAD.

BUT THE SOONER STATE'S DONE MORE THAN MOST TO ADDRESS THAT.

BUT THE SOONER STATE'S DONE MORE THAN MOST TO ADDRESS THAT.

>> LAST YEAR, OKLAHOMA RANKED THAN MOST TO ADDRESS THAT.

>> LAST YEAR, OKLAHOMA RANKED NUMBER ONE IN A STUDY MEASURING >> LAST YEAR, OKLAHOMA RANKED NUMBER ONE IN A STUDY MEASURING EV DRIVERS' PROXIMITY TO NUMBER ONE IN A STUDY MEASURING EV DRIVERS' PROXIMITY TO CHARGING STATIONS.

EV DRIVERS' PROXIMITY TO CHARGING STATIONS.

ODOT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF CHARGING STATIONS.

ODOT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, THE ODOT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, THE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, THE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA GOVERNMENTS, AND THE INDIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA GOVERNMENTS, AND THE INDIAN NATION'S COUNCIL ON GOVERNMENTS GOVERNMENTS, AND THE INDIAN NATION'S COUNCIL ON GOVERNMENTS ON THE EASTSIDE OF THE STATE NATION'S COUNCIL ON GOVERNMENTS ON THE EASTSIDE OF THE STATE HAVE WORKED TOGETHER TO ON THE EASTSIDE OF THE STATE HAVE WORKED TOGETHER TO ACCOMPLISH THAT GOAL.

HAVE WORKED TOGETHER TO ACCOMPLISH THAT GOAL.

ALL OF THE GREEN DOTS ON THIS ACCOMPLISH THAT GOAL.

ALL OF THE GREEN DOTS ON THIS MAP REPRESENT THE 1032 CHARGING ALL OF THE GREEN DOTS ON THIS MAP REPRESENT THE 1032 CHARGING STATION PORTS THAT ARE NOW MAP REPRESENT THE 1032 CHARGING STATION PORTS THAT ARE NOW AVAILABLE.

STATION PORTS THAT ARE NOW AVAILABLE.

THESE ARE ALL WHAT ARE CALLED AVAILABLE.

THESE ARE ALL WHAT ARE CALLED LEVEL-TWO OR LEVEL-THREE THESE ARE ALL WHAT ARE CALLED LEVEL-TWO OR LEVEL-THREE FAST-CHARGING PORTS.

LEVEL-TWO OR LEVEL-THREE FAST-CHARGING PORTS.

THEY DO COST MONEY TO USE, FAST-CHARGING PORTS.

THEY DO COST MONEY TO USE, EITHER BY THE MINUTE OR BY THEY DO COST MONEY TO USE, EITHER BY THE MINUTE OR BY KILOWATT HOUR.

EITHER BY THE MINUTE OR BY KILOWATT HOUR.

THEY SAY ALL 33 OF THEIR KILOWATT HOUR.

THEY SAY ALL 33 OF THEIR CHARGING STATIONS ACROSS THE THEY SAY ALL 33 OF THEIR CHARGING STATIONS ACROSS THE STATE ARE WELL-LIT AREAS, NEXT CHARGING STATIONS ACROSS THE STATE ARE WELL-LIT AREAS, NEXT TO BUSINESSES, LIKE RUDY'S STATE ARE WELL-LIT AREAS, NEXT TO BUSINESSES, LIKE RUDY'S BARBECUE HERE IN NORMAN.

TO BUSINESSES, LIKE RUDY'S BARBECUE HERE IN NORMAN.

WE FOUND IT REALLY IMPORTANT TO BARBECUE HERE IN NORMAN.

WE FOUND IT REALLY IMPORTANT TO HELP PEOPLE GET OVER THAT WE FOUND IT REALLY IMPORTANT TO HELP PEOPLE GET OVER THAT ANXIETY OF NOT BEING ABLE TO GO HELP PEOPLE GET OVER THAT ANXIETY OF NOT BEING ABLE TO GO WHERE THEY WANT TO GO AND BE ANXIETY OF NOT BEING ABLE TO GO WHERE THEY WANT TO GO AND BE ABLE TO CHARGE THEIR CARS.

WHERE THEY WANT TO GO AND BE ABLE TO CHARGE THEIR CARS.

WE'RE CONFIDENT YOU COULD GO IN ABLE TO CHARGE THEIR CARS.

WE'RE CONFIDENT YOU COULD GO IN AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND HAVE WE'RE CONFIDENT YOU COULD GO IN AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND HAVE PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITIES TO AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND HAVE PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITIES TO CHARGE IT ALONG THE WAY.

PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITIES TO CHARGE IT ALONG THE WAY.

>> Reporter: HE DRIVES A TESLA.

CHARGE IT ALONG THE WAY.

>> Reporter: HE DRIVES A TESLA.

>> AS MORE VEHICLES COME OUT AND >> Reporter: HE DRIVES A TESLA.

>> AS MORE VEHICLES COME OUT AND THE PRICE STARTS TO COME DOWN, >> AS MORE VEHICLES COME OUT AND THE PRICE STARTS TO COME DOWN, THEN I THINK IT WILL BE MORE THE PRICE STARTS TO COME DOWN, THEN I THINK IT WILL BE MORE ATTRACTIVE TO FOLKS.

THEN I THINK IT WILL BE MORE ATTRACTIVE TO FOLKS.

>> Reporter: WITHIN THE ATTRACTIVE TO FOLKS.

>> Reporter: WITHIN THE FIVE-COUNTY AREA THEY SERVE A >> Reporter: WITHIN THE FIVE-COUNTY AREA THEY SERVE A SPOKESPERSON TELLS ME THERE ARE FIVE-COUNTY AREA THEY SERVE A SPOKESPERSON TELLS ME THERE ARE AT LEAST 74 CHARGING STATIONS SPOKESPERSON TELLS ME THERE ARE AT LEAST 74 CHARGING STATIONS RIGHT NOW THAT OFFER 300 LEVEL AT LEAST 74 CHARGING STATIONS RIGHT NOW THAT OFFER 300 LEVEL TWO OR LEVEL THREE PORTS.

RIGHT NOW THAT OFFER 300 LEVEL TWO OR LEVEL THREE PORTS.

IN ADDITION, OKLAHOMA HAS TWO OR LEVEL THREE PORTS.

IN ADDITION, OKLAHOMA HAS SECURED A $66 MILLION CHUNK OF IN ADDITION, OKLAHOMA HAS SECURED A $66 MILLION CHUNK OF WHAT'S CALLED THE NATIONAL SECURED A $66 MILLION CHUNK OF WHAT'S CALLED THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC VEHICLE INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT'S CALLED THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC VEHICLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM.

ELECTRIC VEHICLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM.

OVER THE NEXT FIVE TO TEN YEARS, PROGRAM.

OVER THE NEXT FIVE TO TEN YEARS, THE STATE WILL USE THAT MONEY TO OVER THE NEXT FIVE TO TEN YEARS, THE STATE WILL USE THAT MONEY TO BUILD MORE EV CHARGING STATIONS THE STATE WILL USE THAT MONEY TO BUILD MORE EV CHARGING STATIONS IN RURAL AND IN URBAN AREAS.

BUILD MORE EV CHARGING STATIONS IN RURAL AND IN URBAN AREAS.

>> IN OKLAHOMA, THERE ARE 7,000 IN RURAL AND IN URBAN AREAS.

>> IN OKLAHOMA, THERE ARE 7,000 REGISTERED VEHICLES IN THE STATE >> IN OKLAHOMA, THERE ARE 7,000 REGISTERED VEHICLES IN THE STATE THAT ARE EV.

REGISTERED VEHICLES IN THE STATE THAT ARE EV.

THAT IS .02% OF THE ENTIRE FLEET THAT ARE EV.

THAT IS .02% OF THE ENTIRE FLEET POPULATION OF OKLAHOMA, SO IT'S THAT IS .02% OF THE ENTIRE FLEET POPULATION OF OKLAHOMA, SO IT'S VERY LOW RIGHT NOW.

POPULATION OF OKLAHOMA, SO IT'S VERY LOW RIGHT NOW.

BUT YOU'LL SEE THAT INCREASE, VERY LOW RIGHT NOW.

BUT YOU'LL SEE THAT INCREASE, BASICALLY, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT BUT YOU'LL SEE THAT INCREASE, BASICALLY, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IS GOING TO BE OFFERED BY THESE BASICALLY, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IS GOING TO BE OFFERED BY THESE MANUFACTURERS AND WE NEED TO IS GOING TO BE OFFERED BY THESE MANUFACTURERS AND WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THERE'S OPPORTUNITIES MANUFACTURERS AND WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THERE'S OPPORTUNITIES FOR THESE FOLKS THAT ARE BEING MAKE SURE THERE'S OPPORTUNITIES FOR THESE FOLKS THAT ARE BEING KIND OF PUSHED THIS DIRECTION TO FOR THESE FOLKS THAT ARE BEING KIND OF PUSHED THIS DIRECTION TO MAKE SURE THEY HAVE THE KIND OF PUSHED THIS DIRECTION TO MAKE SURE THEY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHARGE.

MAKE SURE THEY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHARGE.

>> Reporter: TONY SMITH SAYS EV OPPORTUNITY TO CHARGE.

>> Reporter: TONY SMITH SAYS EV PRICES ARE COMING DOWN.

>> Reporter: TONY SMITH SAYS EV PRICES ARE COMING DOWN.

>> THE CHEAPEST ONE OUT THERE IS PRICES ARE COMING DOWN.

>> THE CHEAPEST ONE OUT THERE IS THE CHEVY BOLT, NOT THE VOLT, >> THE CHEAPEST ONE OUT THERE IS THE CHEVY BOLT, NOT THE VOLT, BUT THE BOLT.

THE CHEVY BOLT, NOT THE VOLT, BUT THE BOLT.

AND THEY JUST LOWERED THE PRICE.

BUT THE BOLT.

AND THEY JUST LOWERED THE PRICE.

GOOD FOR GM.

AND THEY JUST LOWERED THE PRICE.

GOOD FOR GM.

BY ALMOST $6,000.

GOOD FOR GM.

BY ALMOST $6,000.

IT'S A LITTLE OVER -- IT'S BY ALMOST $6,000.

IT'S A LITTLE OVER -- IT'S ALMOST $27,000.

IT'S A LITTLE OVER -- IT'S ALMOST $27,000.

IT'S $26,000 AND CHANGE.

ALMOST $27,000.

IT'S $26,000 AND CHANGE.

>> IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT IT'S $26,000 AND CHANGE.

>> IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT 80-90% OF THE CHARGING THAT GOES >> IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT 80-90% OF THE CHARGING THAT GOES ON WITH EVs RIGHT NOW IS DONE IN 80-90% OF THE CHARGING THAT GOES ON WITH EVs RIGHT NOW IS DONE IN PEOPLE'S GARBAGES.

ON WITH EVs RIGHT NOW IS DONE IN PEOPLE'S GARBAGES.

IT'S ALSO AVAILABLE NOW AT MANY PEOPLE'S GARBAGES.

IT'S ALSO AVAILABLE NOW AT MANY APARTMENTS.

IT'S ALSO AVAILABLE NOW AT MANY APARTMENTS.

A LOT OF THE CHARGING IS DONE AT APARTMENTS.

A LOT OF THE CHARGING IS DONE AT NIGHT WHEN ELECTRIC IS ITS A LOT OF THE CHARGING IS DONE AT NIGHT WHEN ELECTRIC IS ITS CHEAPEST.

NIGHT WHEN ELECTRIC IS ITS CHEAPEST.

JASON?

CHEAPEST.

JASON?

>> STEVE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

JASON?

>> STEVE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> THE OKLAHOMA COMMISSION HAS >> STEVE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> THE OKLAHOMA COMMISSION HAS APPROVED A $184 MILLION, >> THE OKLAHOMA COMMISSION HAS APPROVED A $184 MILLION, FIVE-YEAR PLAN TO UPGRADE AND APPROVED A $184 MILLION, FIVE-YEAR PLAN TO UPGRADE AND TRANSFORM MANY OF OUR STATES 104 FIVE-YEAR PLAN TO UPGRADE AND TRANSFORM MANY OF OUR STATES 104 GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORTS.

TRANSFORM MANY OF OUR STATES 104 GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORTS.

THEY WILL BENEFIT 57 COMMUNITIES GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORTS.

THEY WILL BENEFIT 57 COMMUNITIES ACROSS OKLAHOMA.

THEY WILL BENEFIT 57 COMMUNITIES ACROSS OKLAHOMA.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS ACROSS OKLAHOMA.

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS PROVIDING $127 MILLION IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS PROVIDING $127 MILLION IN FUNDING WITH THE REMAINING $56 PROVIDING $127 MILLION IN FUNDING WITH THE REMAINING $56 MILLION PAID FOR BY STATE AND FUNDING WITH THE REMAINING $56 MILLION PAID FOR BY STATE AND LOCAL ENTITIES.

MILLION PAID FOR BY STATE AND LOCAL ENTITIES.

>> THE LION'S SHARE OF OUR MONEY LOCAL ENTITIES.

>> THE LION'S SHARE OF OUR MONEY COMES FROM THE FEDERAL >> THE LION'S SHARE OF OUR MONEY COMES FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR AIRPORT COMES FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE.

GOVERNMENT FOR AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE.

WE'RE WORKING ON THAT.

INFRASTRUCTURE.

WE'RE WORKING ON THAT.

OBVIOUSLY, THANKS TO THE WE'RE WORKING ON THAT.

OBVIOUSLY, THANKS TO THE LEGISLATURE AND GOVERNOR GETTING OBVIOUSLY, THANKS TO THE LEGISLATURE AND GOVERNOR GETTING THE COMMISSION $4 MILLION IN LEGISLATURE AND GOVERNOR GETTING THE COMMISSION $4 MILLION IN FUNDING WE WILL BE ABLE TO THE COMMISSION $4 MILLION IN FUNDING WE WILL BE ABLE TO INVEST IN MORE AIRPORT FUNDING WE WILL BE ABLE TO INVEST IN MORE AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE.

INVEST IN MORE AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE.

AS THE STATE CONTINUES TO INFRASTRUCTURE.

AS THE STATE CONTINUES TO INCREASE ITS SHARE OF AS THE STATE CONTINUES TO INCREASE ITS SHARE OF INVESTMENT, WE HOPE THAT THAT INCREASE ITS SHARE OF INVESTMENT, WE HOPE THAT THAT WILL, OBVIOUSLY, TICK UP OUR INVESTMENT, WE HOPE THAT THAT WILL, OBVIOUSLY, TICK UP OUR NUMBER.

WILL, OBVIOUSLY, TICK UP OUR NUMBER.

>> OKLAHOMA HAS 104 GENERAL NUMBER.

>> OKLAHOMA HAS 104 GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORTS AND FOUR >> OKLAHOMA HAS 104 GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORTS AND FOUR COMMERCIAL AIRPORTS IN ITS AVIATION AIRPORTS AND FOUR COMMERCIAL AIRPORTS IN ITS SYSTEM.

COMMERCIAL AIRPORTS IN ITS SYSTEM.

>> THE HIGH OIL AND NATURAL GAS SYSTEM.

>> THE HIGH OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRICES ARE IMPACTING OKLAHOMA'S >> THE HIGH OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRICES ARE IMPACTING OKLAHOMA'S TREASURY.

PRICES ARE IMPACTING OKLAHOMA'S TREASURY.

THAT LEADS THIS WEEK'S OKLAHOMA TREASURY.

THAT LEADS THIS WEEK'S OKLAHOMA BUSINESS REVIEW.

THAT LEADS THIS WEEK'S OKLAHOMA BUSINESS REVIEW.

>> JUNE SAW THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF BUSINESS REVIEW.

>> JUNE SAW THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION >> JUNE SAW THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION TAX IN THE STATE'S HISTORY AT OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION TAX IN THE STATE'S HISTORY AT MORE THAN $171 MILLION.

TAX IN THE STATE'S HISTORY AT MORE THAN $171 MILLION.

IN THE LAST 1MONTHS, GROSS MORE THAN $171 MILLION.

IN THE LAST 1MONTHS, GROSS PRODUCTION TAXES HAVE TOTALED IN THE LAST 1MONTHS, GROSS PRODUCTION TAXES HAVE TOTALED $1.5 BILLION.

PRODUCTION TAXES HAVE TOTALED $1.5 BILLION.

OIL PRICES WERE MORE THAN $100 A $1.5 BILLION.

OIL PRICES WERE MORE THAN $100 A BARREL AND GAS WAS OVER $6.50 OIL PRICES WERE MORE THAN $100 A BARREL AND GAS WAS OVER $6.50 PER MILLION BTU WHEN THE TAX WAS BARREL AND GAS WAS OVER $6.50 PER MILLION BTU WHEN THE TAX WAS ASSESSED.

PER MILLION BTU WHEN THE TAX WAS ASSESSED.

TOTAL RECEIPTS WERE $1.5 BILLION ASSESSED.

TOTAL RECEIPTS WERE $1.5 BILLION LAST MONTH DOWN FROM JUNE OF TOTAL RECEIPTS WERE $1.5 BILLION LAST MONTH DOWN FROM JUNE OF 2021.

LAST MONTH DOWN FROM JUNE OF 2021.

TULSA-BASED WILLIAMS IS MOVING 2021.

TULSA-BASED WILLIAMS IS MOVING FORWARD WITH THE CLEAN ENERGY TULSA-BASED WILLIAMS IS MOVING FORWARD WITH THE CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT CALLED THE LOUISIANA FORWARD WITH THE CLEAN ENERGY PROJECT CALLED THE LOUISIANA ENERGY GATEWAY.

PROJECT CALLED THE LOUISIANA ENERGY GATEWAY.

IT'S EXPECTED TO GATHER NEARLY ENERGY GATEWAY.

IT'S EXPECTED TO GATHER NEARLY TWO BILLION CUBIC FEET OF IT'S EXPECTED TO GATHER NEARLY TWO BILLION CUBIC FEET OF NATURAL GAS A DAY FROM THE TWO BILLION CUBIC FEET OF NATURAL GAS A DAY FROM THE HAINESVILLE BASIN.

NATURAL GAS A DAY FROM THE HAINESVILLE BASIN.

THE NEW PROJECT ALSO WILL HAINESVILLE BASIN.

THE NEW PROJECT ALSO WILL PROVIDE CARBON CAPTURE AND THE NEW PROJECT ALSO WILL PROVIDE CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE TO REDUCE CARBON PROVIDE CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE TO REDUCE CARBON EMISSIONS ALONG THE NATURAL GAS STORAGE TO REDUCE CARBON EMISSIONS ALONG THE NATURAL GAS SUPPLY CHAIN.

EMISSIONS ALONG THE NATURAL GAS SUPPLY CHAIN.

WILLIAMS EXPECTS THE LOUISIANA SUPPLY CHAIN.

WILLIAMS EXPECTS THE LOUISIANA ENERGY GATEWAY PROJECT TO GO WILLIAMS EXPECTS THE LOUISIANA ENERGY GATEWAY PROJECT TO GO INTO SERVICE IN LATE 2024.

ENERGY GATEWAY PROJECT TO GO INTO SERVICE IN LATE 2024.

OKLAHOMA CITY BASED ASCENT INTO SERVICE IN LATE 2024.

OKLAHOMA CITY BASED ASCENT RESOURCES IS EXPANDING IN OHIO.

OKLAHOMA CITY BASED ASCENT RESOURCES IS EXPANDING IN OHIO.

THE COMPANY HAS ENTERED INTO AN RESOURCES IS EXPANDING IN OHIO.

THE COMPANY HAS ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE ASSETS IN THE COMPANY HAS ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE ASSETS IN THE UTICA SHALE FORMATION FOR AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE ASSETS IN THE UTICA SHALE FORMATION FOR $270 MILLION.

THE UTICA SHALE FORMATION FOR $270 MILLION.

THE MOVE EXPANDS ASCENT'S ASSET $270 MILLION.

THE MOVE EXPANDS ASCENT'S ASSET BASE IN OHIO BY NEARLY 27,000 THE MOVE EXPANDS ASCENT'S ASSET BASE IN OHIO BY NEARLY 27,000 NET ANCHORS.

BASE IN OHIO BY NEARLY 27,000 NET ANCHORS.

ASCENT EXPANDED THE CREDIT LINE NET ANCHORS.

ASCENT EXPANDED THE CREDIT LINE TO HELP MAKE THE PURCHASE ALONG ASCENT EXPANDED THE CREDIT LINE TO HELP MAKE THE PURCHASE ALONG WITH CASH ON HAND.

TO HELP MAKE THE PURCHASE ALONG WITH CASH ON HAND.

THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA IS WITH CASH ON HAND.

THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA IS LAUNCHING TWO NEW ONLINE DEGREE THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA IS LAUNCHING TWO NEW ONLINE DEGREE PROGRAMS.

LAUNCHING TWO NEW ONLINE DEGREE PROGRAMS.

THE PROGRAM WILL BE HOUSED PROGRAMS.

THE PROGRAM WILL BE HOUSED WITHIN THE PRICE COLLEGE OF THE PROGRAM WILL BE HOUSED WITHIN THE PRICE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS.

WITHIN THE PRICE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS.

THE U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR BUSINESS.

THE U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS OVER THE NEXT 10 THE U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS, DEMAND FOR SUPPLY CHAIN STATISTICS OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS, DEMAND FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGERS AND BUSINESS ANALYSTS YEARS, DEMAND FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGERS AND BUSINESS ANALYSTS WILL INCREASE BETWEEN 25-30%.

MANAGERS AND BUSINESS ANALYSTS WILL INCREASE BETWEEN 25-30%.

ENROLLMENT IS OPEN FOR THE FALL WILL INCREASE BETWEEN 25-30%.

ENROLLMENT IS OPEN FOR THE FALL 2022 SEMESTER.

ENROLLMENT IS OPEN FOR THE FALL 2022 SEMESTER.

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN TULSA 2022 SEMESTER.

TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN TULSA AND INNOVATION LABS ARE WORKING TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN TULSA AND INNOVATION LABS ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO CREATE A TECH BORING AND INNOVATION LABS ARE WORKING TOGETHER TO CREATE A TECH BORING PIPELINE.

TOGETHER TO CREATE A TECH BORING PIPELINE.

THE INITIATIVE WILL GIVE ADULT PIPELINE.

THE INITIATIVE WILL GIVE ADULT LEARNERS A CHANCE TO PARTICIPATE THE INITIATIVE WILL GIVE ADULT LEARNERS A CHANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN A FULLY ONLINE BOOT CAMP LEARNERS A CHANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN A FULLY ONLINE BOOT CAMP TRAINING PROGRAM TO INCREASE THE IN A FULLY ONLINE BOOT CAMP TRAINING PROGRAM TO INCREASE THE TECHNICAL TALENT WORKFORCE IN TRAINING PROGRAM TO INCREASE THE TECHNICAL TALENT WORKFORCE IN THE AREA.

TECHNICAL TALENT WORKFORCE IN THE AREA.

THE PROGRAM WILL BE FOCUSED THE AREA.

THE PROGRAM WILL BE FOCUSED TOWARD HELPING WOMEN AND THE PROGRAM WILL BE FOCUSED TOWARD HELPING WOMEN AND MINORITY LOWER INCOME TOWARD HELPING WOMEN AND MINORITY LOWER INCOME PROFESSIONALS AND IS AT NO COST MINORITY LOWER INCOME PROFESSIONALS AND IS AT NO COST TO THE ADULT STUDENT.

PROFESSIONALS AND IS AT NO COST TO THE ADULT STUDENT.

[ ] TO THE ADULT STUDENT.

[ ] >> THIS WEEK, THE PORTRAITS OF [ ] >> THIS WEEK, THE PORTRAITS OF OKLAHOMA'S FOUR SONS WERE >> THIS WEEK, THE PORTRAITS OF OKLAHOMA'S FOUR SONS WERE REINSTALLED AT THE STATE OKLAHOMA'S FOUR SONS WERE REINSTALLED AT THE STATE CAPITOL.

REINSTALLED AT THE STATE CAPITOL.

AFTER SITTING IN STORAGE FOR SIX CAPITOL.

AFTER SITTING IN STORAGE FOR SIX YEARS, PAINTED BY CHARLES BANKS AFTER SITTING IN STORAGE FOR SIX YEARS, PAINTED BY CHARLES BANKS WILSON, WILL ROGERS, JIM THORPE, YEARS, PAINTED BY CHARLES BANKS WILSON, WILL ROGERS, JIM THORPE, SEQUOYAH AND ROBERT S. KERR AND WILSON, WILL ROGERS, JIM THORPE, SEQUOYAH AND ROBERT S. KERR AND NOW THEY ARE RETURNED TO THEIR SEQUOYAH AND ROBERT S. KERR AND NOW THEY ARE RETURNED TO THEIR HOME IN THE 4th FLOOR ROTUNDA.

NOW THEY ARE RETURNED TO THEIR HOME IN THE 4th FLOOR ROTUNDA.

A HEADS-UP FOR OKLAHOMANS HOME IN THE 4th FLOOR ROTUNDA.

A HEADS-UP FOR OKLAHOMANS IMPACTED BY TORNADOES AND A HEADS-UP FOR OKLAHOMANS IMPACTED BY TORNADOES AND FLOODING DURING THE FIRST WEEK IMPACTED BY TORNADOES AND FLOODING DURING THE FIRST WEEK OF MAY.

FLOODING DURING THE FIRST WEEK OF MAY.

HOMEOWNERS AND RENTERS CAN NOW OF MAY.

HOMEOWNERS AND RENTERS CAN NOW APPLY FOR DISASTER LOAN RELIEF HOMEOWNERS AND RENTERS CAN NOW APPLY FOR DISASTER LOAN RELIEF FROM FEMA.

APPLY FOR DISASTER LOAN RELIEF FROM FEMA.

SEVEN COUNTIES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR FROM FEMA.

SEVEN COUNTIES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR ASSISTANCE, ADAIR, CHEROKEE, SEVEN COUNTIES ARE ELIGIBLE FOR ASSISTANCE, ADAIR, CHEROKEE, MUSKOGEE, OKMULGEE, ASSISTANCE, ADAIR, CHEROKEE, MUSKOGEE, OKMULGEE, POTTAWATOMIE, SEMINOLE AND MUSKOGEE, OKMULGEE, POTTAWATOMIE, SEMINOLE AND TULSA.

POTTAWATOMIE, SEMINOLE AND TULSA.

HOW WILL THE SUPREME COURT'S TULSA.

HOW WILL THE SUPREME COURT'S MULTIPLE RULINGS BE APPLIED HERE HOW WILL THE SUPREME COURT'S MULTIPLE RULINGS BE APPLIED HERE IN OKLAHOMA?

MULTIPLE RULINGS BE APPLIED HERE IN OKLAHOMA?

IT'S PROBABLY TOO SOON TO TELL, IN OKLAHOMA?

IT'S PROBABLY TOO SOON TO TELL, BUT IN OUR WEEKLY IN-DEPTH IT'S PROBABLY TOO SOON TO TELL, BUT IN OUR WEEKLY IN-DEPTH CONVERSATION THIS WEEK, BUT IN OUR WEEKLY IN-DEPTH CONVERSATION THIS WEEK, MODERATOR SUSAN CADOT IS JOINED CONVERSATION THIS WEEK, MODERATOR SUSAN CADOT IS JOINED BY A PANEL OF LEGAL EXPERTS WHO MODERATOR SUSAN CADOT IS JOINED BY A PANEL OF LEGAL EXPERTS WHO ARE KEEPING A CLOSE EYE ON HOW BY A PANEL OF LEGAL EXPERTS WHO ARE KEEPING A CLOSE EYE ON HOW THESE CONTROVERSIAL NEW ARE KEEPING A CLOSE EYE ON HOW THESE CONTROVERSIAL NEW DECISIONS WILL IMPACT THESE CONTROVERSIAL NEW DECISIONS WILL IMPACT OKLAHOMANS.

DECISIONS WILL IMPACT OKLAHOMANS.

>> YES, I WANT TO JUMP RIGHT IN OKLAHOMANS.

>> YES, I WANT TO JUMP RIGHT IN BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH TO COVER >> YES, I WANT TO JUMP RIGHT IN BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH TO COVER AND I NEVER HAVE ENOUGH TIME.

BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH TO COVER AND I NEVER HAVE ENOUGH TIME.

I'D LIKE TO INTRODUCE OUR GUESTS AND I NEVER HAVE ENOUGH TIME.

I'D LIKE TO INTRODUCE OUR GUESTS TO YOU.

I'D LIKE TO INTRODUCE OUR GUESTS TO YOU.

WE HAVE PROFESSOR JEREMY TELMAN TO YOU.

WE HAVE PROFESSOR JEREMY TELMAN WHO IS A PROFESSOR WITH THE WE HAVE PROFESSOR JEREMY TELMAN WHO IS A PROFESSOR WITH THE SCHOOL OF LAW.

WHO IS A PROFESSOR WITH THE SCHOOL OF LAW.

THEN WE HAVE BRENDA GOLDEN, WHO SCHOOL OF LAW.

THEN WE HAVE BRENDA GOLDEN, WHO IS WITH GOLDEN LEGAL SERVICES, THEN WE HAVE BRENDA GOLDEN, WHO IS WITH GOLDEN LEGAL SERVICES, AN ATTORNEY THERE.

IS WITH GOLDEN LEGAL SERVICES, AN ATTORNEY THERE.

I'D LIKE TO THANK BOTH OF YOU AN ATTORNEY THERE.

I'D LIKE TO THANK BOTH OF YOU FOR BEING WITH US.

I'D LIKE TO THANK BOTH OF YOU FOR BEING WITH US.

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

FOR BEING WITH US.

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

>> THANK YOU SO MUCH.

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

>> THANK YOU SO MUCH.

IT'S AN HONOR TO BE HERE.

>> THANK YOU SO MUCH.

IT'S AN HONOR TO BE HERE.

>> WELL, WE'RE HONORED TO HAVE IT'S AN HONOR TO BE HERE.

>> WELL, WE'RE HONORED TO HAVE YOU BOTH.

>> WELL, WE'RE HONORED TO HAVE YOU BOTH.

AND YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO YOU BOTH.

AND YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO EXPLAIN TO ME IN LAYMAN'S TERMS AND YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO EXPLAIN TO ME IN LAYMAN'S TERMS WHAT IS GOING ON BECAUSE SO MUCH EXPLAIN TO ME IN LAYMAN'S TERMS WHAT IS GOING ON BECAUSE SO MUCH HAS HAPPENED AT THE FEDERAL WHAT IS GOING ON BECAUSE SO MUCH HAS HAPPENED AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL WITH THE SUPREME COURT.

HAS HAPPENED AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL WITH THE SUPREME COURT.

PROFESSOR TELMAN, I WANT TO LEVEL WITH THE SUPREME COURT.

PROFESSOR TELMAN, I WANT TO START WITH A CASE IN NEW YORK PROFESSOR TELMAN, I WANT TO START WITH A CASE IN NEW YORK CITY STATE.

START WITH A CASE IN NEW YORK CITY STATE.

RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION v. CITY STATE.

RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION v. BRUIN.

RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION v. BRUIN.

WHAT IS THE CRUX OF THAT CASE?

BRUIN.

WHAT IS THE CRUX OF THAT CASE?

>> SO, THAT'S A SECOND AMENDMENT WHAT IS THE CRUX OF THAT CASE?

>> SO, THAT'S A SECOND AMENDMENT CASE, A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS CASE.

>> SO, THAT'S A SECOND AMENDMENT CASE, A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS CASE.

NEW YORK AND FIVE OTHER STATES CASE, A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS CASE.

NEW YORK AND FIVE OTHER STATES HAD -- IF YOU WANT TO CARRY A NEW YORK AND FIVE OTHER STATES HAD -- IF YOU WANT TO CARRY A GUN OUTSIDE OF THE HOME, YOU HAD -- IF YOU WANT TO CARRY A GUN OUTSIDE OF THE HOME, YOU NEED TO APPLY FOR A LICENSE.

GUN OUTSIDE OF THE HOME, YOU NEED TO APPLY FOR A LICENSE.

AND THERE ARE SOME CRITERIA THAT NEED TO APPLY FOR A LICENSE.

AND THERE ARE SOME CRITERIA THAT YOU HAVE TO MEET, BUT EVEN IF AND THERE ARE SOME CRITERIA THAT YOU HAVE TO MEET, BUT EVEN IF YOU MEET ALL THOSE CRITERIA, THE YOU HAVE TO MEET, BUT EVEN IF YOU MEET ALL THOSE CRITERIA, THE STATE STILL HAS DISCRETION TO YOU MEET ALL THOSE CRITERIA, THE STATE STILL HAS DISCRETION TO SAY, YOU DON'T REALLY NEED A STATE STILL HAS DISCRETION TO SAY, YOU DON'T REALLY NEED A GUN.

SAY, YOU DON'T REALLY NEED A GUN.

AND THE COURT HELD 6-3 THAT THAT GUN.

AND THE COURT HELD 6-3 THAT THAT DISCRETION, THAT POWER OF THE AND THE COURT HELD 6-3 THAT THAT DISCRETION, THAT POWER OF THE STATE TO SAY NO, YOU DON'T DISCRETION, THAT POWER OF THE STATE TO SAY NO, YOU DON'T REALLY NEED A GUN TO PEOPLE STATE TO SAY NO, YOU DON'T REALLY NEED A GUN TO PEOPLE VIOLATES THE SECOND AMENDMENT.

REALLY NEED A GUN TO PEOPLE VIOLATES THE SECOND AMENDMENT.

SO, THAT WILL AFFECT THOSE SIX VIOLATES THE SECOND AMENDMENT.

SO, THAT WILL AFFECT THOSE SIX STATES -- OR THE FIVE STATES AND SO, THAT WILL AFFECT THOSE SIX STATES -- OR THE FIVE STATES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

STATES -- OR THE FIVE STATES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

THE REST OF THE STATES HAVE MORE THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

THE REST OF THE STATES HAVE MORE PERMISSIVE REGULATORY REGIMES THE REST OF THE STATES HAVE MORE PERMISSIVE REGULATORY REGIMES WHICH, AS FAR AS WE KNOW, ARE PERMISSIVE REGULATORY REGIMES WHICH, AS FAR AS WE KNOW, ARE CONSTITUTIONALLY OKAY.

WHICH, AS FAR AS WE KNOW, ARE CONSTITUTIONALLY OKAY.

>> CAN STATES MAKE THEIR OWN CONSTITUTIONALLY OKAY.

>> CAN STATES MAKE THEIR OWN LAWS?

>> CAN STATES MAKE THEIR OWN LAWS?

>> SOME STATES WHO HAVE PASSED LAWS?

>> SOME STATES WHO HAVE PASSED LAWS RESTRICTING THE AMOUNT OF >> SOME STATES WHO HAVE PASSED LAWS RESTRICTING THE AMOUNT OF BULLET THAT A PERSON CAN LAWS RESTRICTING THE AMOUNT OF BULLET THAT A PERSON CAN PURCHASE.

BULLET THAT A PERSON CAN PURCHASE.

SO, THEY CAN'T PUT THE BULLET IN PURCHASE.

SO, THEY CAN'T PUT THE BULLET IN THE CHAMBER.

SO, THEY CAN'T PUT THE BULLET IN THE CHAMBER.

THOSE HAVE PASSED MUSTER?

THE CHAMBER.

THOSE HAVE PASSED MUSTER?

>> RIGHT.

THOSE HAVE PASSED MUSTER?

>> RIGHT.

THERE'S SOME TENSION BETWEEN THE >> RIGHT.

THERE'S SOME TENSION BETWEEN THE COURT'S ABORTION DECISION, THERE'S SOME TENSION BETWEEN THE COURT'S ABORTION DECISION, DOBBS, AND THE COURT'S GUN COURT'S ABORTION DECISION, DOBBS, AND THE COURT'S GUN DECISION, BRUIN, IN THAT IN DOBBS, AND THE COURT'S GUN DECISION, BRUIN, IN THAT IN DOBBS, THE COURT IS SAYING, UM, DECISION, BRUIN, IN THAT IN DOBBS, THE COURT IS SAYING, UM, THERE'S NO ROLE FOR THE DOBBS, THE COURT IS SAYING, UM, THERE'S NO ROLE FOR THE CONSTITUTION.

THERE'S NO ROLE FOR THE CONSTITUTION.

LET STATES REGULATE ABORTION CONSTITUTION.

LET STATES REGULATE ABORTION HOWEVER THEY WANT.

LET STATES REGULATE ABORTION HOWEVER THEY WANT.

THERE'S REALLY NO CONSTITUTIONAL HOWEVER THEY WANT.

THERE'S REALLY NO CONSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS -- FEDERAL THERE'S REALLY NO CONSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS -- FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS ON WHAT BARRIERS -- FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS ON WHAT THE STATES CAN DO.

CONSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS ON WHAT THE STATES CAN DO.

BUT IN GUNS, THEY'RE GOING THE THE STATES CAN DO.

BUT IN GUNS, THEY'RE GOING THE OTHER WAY AND SAYING, NO.

BUT IN GUNS, THEY'RE GOING THE OTHER WAY AND SAYING, NO.

THE CONSTITUTION DOES SPEAK TO OTHER WAY AND SAYING, NO.

THE CONSTITUTION DOES SPEAK TO ARMS REGULATION, AND THERE ARE THE CONSTITUTION DOES SPEAK TO ARMS REGULATION, AND THERE ARE LOTS OF SITUATIONS WHERE THIS ARMS REGULATION, AND THERE ARE LOTS OF SITUATIONS WHERE THIS COURT AT LEAST SAYS THE FEDERAL LOTS OF SITUATIONS WHERE THIS COURT AT LEAST SAYS THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS GUN COURT AT LEAST SAYS THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS GUN LEGISLATION.

CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS GUN LEGISLATION.

OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO.

LEGISLATION.

OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO.

Ms. GOLDEN, TELL US ABOUT THE OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO.

Ms. GOLDEN, TELL US ABOUT THE CASE.

Ms. GOLDEN, TELL US ABOUT THE CASE.

>> THE CASE INVOLVED A CASE.

>> THE CASE INVOLVED A NON-INDIAN PERPETRATOR THAT >> THE CASE INVOLVED A NON-INDIAN PERPETRATOR THAT COMMITTED CHILD ABUSE AGAINST A NON-INDIAN PERPETRATOR THAT COMMITTED CHILD ABUSE AGAINST A CHEROKEE CHILD IN THE BOUNDARIES COMMITTED CHILD ABUSE AGAINST A CHEROKEE CHILD IN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CHEROKEE RESERVATION, CHEROKEE CHILD IN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CHEROKEE RESERVATION, WHICH WAS TULSA, OKLAHOMA.

OF THE CHEROKEE RESERVATION, WHICH WAS TULSA, OKLAHOMA.

AFTER THE McGIRT RULING, 43% OF WHICH WAS TULSA, OKLAHOMA.

AFTER THE McGIRT RULING, 43% OF THE STATE WAS DEEMED RESERVATION AFTER THE McGIRT RULING, 43% OF THE STATE WAS DEEMED RESERVATION BECAUSE CONGRESS HAD NEVER THE STATE WAS DEEMED RESERVATION BECAUSE CONGRESS HAD NEVER DEESTABLISHED THOSE BECAUSE CONGRESS HAD NEVER DEESTABLISHED THOSE RESERVATIONS, WHICH DEFAULTED DEESTABLISHED THOSE RESERVATIONS, WHICH DEFAULTED THE CRIMES COMMITTED ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS, WHICH DEFAULTED THE CRIMES COMMITTED ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS UNDER FEDERAL THE CRIMES COMMITTED ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS UNDER FEDERAL AUTHORITY.

RESERVATIONS UNDER FEDERAL AUTHORITY.

CASTRO CHALLENGED THE AUTHORITY.

CASTRO CHALLENGED THE LONG-SETTLED PRECEDENT THAT THE CASTRO CHALLENGED THE LONG-SETTLED PRECEDENT THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROSECUTED LONG-SETTLED PRECEDENT THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROSECUTED CRIMES COMMITTED BY A NON-INDIAN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROSECUTED CRIMES COMMITTED BY A NON-INDIAN ON RESERVATION LAND.

CRIMES COMMITTED BY A NON-INDIAN ON RESERVATION LAND.

AND THIS HAS BEEN SETTLED LAW ON RESERVATION LAND.

AND THIS HAS BEEN SETTLED LAW SINCE THE 1800s, BASICALLY, THAT AND THIS HAS BEEN SETTLED LAW SINCE THE 1800s, BASICALLY, THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ONLY HAS SINCE THE 1800s, BASICALLY, THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ONLY HAS THE JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ONLY HAS THE JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE CRIMES ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

THE JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE CRIMES ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

NOW THIS COURT HAS BASICALLY CRIMES ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

NOW THIS COURT HAS BASICALLY UNDONE ALL THE PRECEDENCE OF 100 NOW THIS COURT HAS BASICALLY UNDONE ALL THE PRECEDENCE OF 100 YEARS AND ERODED TRIBAL UNDONE ALL THE PRECEDENCE OF 100 YEARS AND ERODED TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY BECAUSE IN THE YEARS AND ERODED TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY BECAUSE IN THE OPINION WRITTEN BY JUST SOVEREIGNTY BECAUSE IN THE OPINION WRITTEN BY JUST KAVANAUGH, HE WRITES THE CASE IS OPINION WRITTEN BY JUST KAVANAUGH, HE WRITES THE CASE IS WRONG AND THAT STATES HAVE KAVANAUGH, HE WRITES THE CASE IS WRONG AND THAT STATES HAVE AUTHORITY OVER INDIANS WITHIN WRONG AND THAT STATES HAVE AUTHORITY OVER INDIANS WITHIN THEIR BOUNDARIES.

AUTHORITY OVER INDIANS WITHIN THEIR BOUNDARIES.

SO, I SEE IT AS AN EROSION OF THEIR BOUNDARIES.

SO, I SEE IT AS AN EROSION OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY AND, YES, THE SO, I SEE IT AS AN EROSION OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY AND, YES, THE STATE IS COUNTING THIS AS A WIN TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY AND, YES, THE STATE IS COUNTING THIS AS A WIN BECAUSE NOW THEY HAVE THE STATE IS COUNTING THIS AS A WIN BECAUSE NOW THEY HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE BECAUSE NOW THEY HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE NON-INDIAN OFFENDERS ON AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE NON-INDIAN OFFENDERS ON RESERVATIONS WHERE THEY DIDN'T NON-INDIAN OFFENDERS ON RESERVATIONS WHERE THEY DIDN'T BEFORE.

RESERVATIONS WHERE THEY DIDN'T BEFORE.

>> DO THEY HAVE TOTAL RIGHTS IN BEFORE.

>> DO THEY HAVE TOTAL RIGHTS IN THAT TO PROSECUTE?

>> DO THEY HAVE TOTAL RIGHTS IN THAT TO PROSECUTE?

DO THE STATES HAVE TOTAL ACCESS THAT TO PROSECUTE?

DO THE STATES HAVE TOTAL ACCESS TO DO THAT NOW?

DO THE STATES HAVE TOTAL ACCESS TO DO THAT NOW?

>> THEY HAVE ACCESS CONCURRENTLY TO DO THAT NOW?

>> THEY HAVE ACCESS CONCURRENTLY WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

>> THEY HAVE ACCESS CONCURRENTLY WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

UM, NOW THAT MEANS THAT EITHER WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

UM, NOW THAT MEANS THAT EITHER OR COULD PICK UP THE CHARGES, UM, NOW THAT MEANS THAT EITHER OR COULD PICK UP THE CHARGES, WHICH, IN THE PAST, HAS BEEN AN OR COULD PICK UP THE CHARGES, WHICH, IN THE PAST, HAS BEEN AN ISSUE BECAUSE SOME OF THE CRIMES WHICH, IN THE PAST, HAS BEEN AN ISSUE BECAUSE SOME OF THE CRIMES THAT ARE COMMITTED ON WHAT WE ISSUE BECAUSE SOME OF THE CRIMES THAT ARE COMMITTED ON WHAT WE CALL TRUST LAND, RESTRICTED THAT ARE COMMITTED ON WHAT WE CALL TRUST LAND, RESTRICTED LAND, THOSE HAVE BEEN HARD TO CALL TRUST LAND, RESTRICTED LAND, THOSE HAVE BEEN HARD TO PROSECUTE BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW LAND, THOSE HAVE BEEN HARD TO PROSECUTE BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHERE THE BOUNDARIES ARE AT.

PROSECUTE BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHERE THE BOUNDARIES ARE AT.

UM, AND NOW THE STATE HAS WHERE THE BOUNDARIES ARE AT.

UM, AND NOW THE STATE HAS CONCURRENT JURISDICTION AND WE UM, AND NOW THE STATE HAS CONCURRENT JURISDICTION AND WE DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THOSE CONCURRENT JURISDICTION AND WE DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THOSE BOUNDARIES.

DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THOSE BOUNDARIES.

>> I WAS GOING TO ASK YOU, YOU BOUNDARIES.

>> I WAS GOING TO ASK YOU, YOU KNOW, THE TRIBES HAVE THEIR OWN >> I WAS GOING TO ASK YOU, YOU KNOW, THE TRIBES HAVE THEIR OWN COURT SYSTEM.

KNOW, THE TRIBES HAVE THEIR OWN COURT SYSTEM.

THEY'RE A SOVEREIGN NATION.

COURT SYSTEM.

THEY'RE A SOVEREIGN NATION.

WHY WOULDN'T THE TRIBES THEY'RE A SOVEREIGN NATION.

WHY WOULDN'T THE TRIBES PROSECUTE OR CARRY OUT WHY WOULDN'T THE TRIBES PROSECUTE OR CARRY OUT PROSECUTION OR DUE PROCESS FOR PROSECUTE OR CARRY OUT PROSECUTION OR DUE PROCESS FOR ANY CRIME, NO MATTER WHO WHITED PROSECUTION OR DUE PROCESS FOR ANY CRIME, NO MATTER WHO WHITED IT, ON THEIR SOVEREIGN LAND?

ANY CRIME, NO MATTER WHO WHITED IT, ON THEIR SOVEREIGN LAND?

>> THE CONGRESS HAS LIMITED THE IT, ON THEIR SOVEREIGN LAND?

>> THE CONGRESS HAS LIMITED THE TRIBES' POWERS OVER HUNDRED OF >> THE CONGRESS HAS LIMITED THE TRIBES' POWERS OVER HUNDRED OF YEARS.

TRIBES' POWERS OVER HUNDRED OF YEARS.

THEY LIMITED THE TRIBES' ABILITY YEARS.

THEY LIMITED THE TRIBES' ABILITY TO HAND DOWN SENTENCES LONGER THEY LIMITED THE TRIBES' ABILITY TO HAND DOWN SENTENCES LONGER THAN THREE YEARS IN PRISON AND TO HAND DOWN SENTENCES LONGER THAN THREE YEARS IN PRISON AND THEN, OF COURSE, THE SUPREME THAN THREE YEARS IN PRISON AND THEN, OF COURSE, THE SUPREME COURT IN McBRATNY HAS LIMITED THEN, OF COURSE, THE SUPREME COURT IN McBRATNY HAS LIMITED THE SUPREME COURT IN RENO AS COURT IN McBRATNY HAS LIMITED THE SUPREME COURT IN RENO AS WELL THAT TRIBES CAN'T BE THE SUPREME COURT IN RENO AS WELL THAT TRIBES CAN'T BE TRUSTED, IN OTHER WORDS, TO BE WELL THAT TRIBES CAN'T BE TRUSTED, IN OTHER WORDS, TO BE FAIR TO NON-INDIANS, SO WE TRUSTED, IN OTHER WORDS, TO BE FAIR TO NON-INDIANS, SO WE COULDN'T PROSECUTE NON-INDIANS FAIR TO NON-INDIANS, SO WE COULDN'T PROSECUTE NON-INDIANS FOR CRIMES COMMITTED ON OUR COULDN'T PROSECUTE NON-INDIANS FOR CRIMES COMMITTED ON OUR LAND.

FOR CRIMES COMMITTED ON OUR LAND.

>> MY LAST QUESTION, AND THIS LAND.

>> MY LAST QUESTION, AND THIS MAY NOT BE THE BRIGHTEST >> MY LAST QUESTION, AND THIS MAY NOT BE THE BRIGHTEST QUESTION, BUT I DON'T KNOW THE MAY NOT BE THE BRIGHTEST QUESTION, BUT I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER SO I WILL ASK IT.

QUESTION, BUT I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER SO I WILL ASK IT.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ANSWER SO I WILL ASK IT.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HAVING FEDERAL PROSECUTION WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HAVING FEDERAL PROSECUTION VERSUS STATE PROSECUTING CRIMES?

HAVING FEDERAL PROSECUTION VERSUS STATE PROSECUTING CRIMES?

>> WELL, OF COURSE, THE FEDERAL VERSUS STATE PROSECUTING CRIMES?

>> WELL, OF COURSE, THE FEDERAL GUIDELINES AND STATUTES FOR >> WELL, OF COURSE, THE FEDERAL GUIDELINES AND STATUTES FOR CRIMES ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE GUIDELINES AND STATUTES FOR CRIMES ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE STATE'S STATUTES AND CRIMES.

CRIMES ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE STATE'S STATUTES AND CRIMES.

THE WHOLE PROCESS OF PROSECUTING STATE'S STATUTES AND CRIMES.

THE WHOLE PROCESS OF PROSECUTING SOMEONE IN THE FEDERAL SYSTEM THE WHOLE PROCESS OF PROSECUTING SOMEONE IN THE FEDERAL SYSTEM DIFFERS FROM THE STATE SYSTEM.

SOMEONE IN THE FEDERAL SYSTEM DIFFERS FROM THE STATE SYSTEM.

THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF DIFFERS FROM THE STATE SYSTEM.

THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF DIFFERENCE IN THE SENTENCING THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF DIFFERENCE IN THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND THE TYPES OF DIFFERENCE IN THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND THE TYPES OF CRIMES THAT THE FEDERAL GUIDELINES AND THE TYPES OF CRIMES THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROSECUTES.

CRIMES THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROSECUTES.

>> I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE WAS A GOVERNMENT PROSECUTES.

>> I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE WAS A REASON WHY THE TRIBAL NATIONS >> I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE WAS A REASON WHY THE TRIBAL NATIONS PREFERRED THE FEDERAL REASON WHY THE TRIBAL NATIONS PREFERRED THE FEDERAL PROSECUTION TO STATE-LEVEL PREFERRED THE FEDERAL PROSECUTION TO STATE-LEVEL PROSECUTION.

PROSECUTION TO STATE-LEVEL PROSECUTION.

SO, THAT'S PROBABLY THE REASON, PROSECUTION.

SO, THAT'S PROBABLY THE REASON, THEN.

SO, THAT'S PROBABLY THE REASON, THEN.

>> WELL, THE REASON THAT -- IT'S THEN.

>> WELL, THE REASON THAT -- IT'S BECAUSE THE BOUNDARIES OF OUR >> WELL, THE REASON THAT -- IT'S BECAUSE THE BOUNDARIES OF OUR SOVEREIGNTY UNDER THE PREVIOUS BECAUSE THE BOUNDARIES OF OUR SOVEREIGNTY UNDER THE PREVIOUS RULINGS HAD STATED THAT ANY SOVEREIGNTY UNDER THE PREVIOUS RULINGS HAD STATED THAT ANY CRIME COMMITTED WITHIN OUR RULINGS HAD STATED THAT ANY CRIME COMMITTED WITHIN OUR JURISDICTION, OUR TRIBE, THE CRIME COMMITTED WITHIN OUR JURISDICTION, OUR TRIBE, THE STATE COULD NOT PROSECUTE IN ANY JURISDICTION, OUR TRIBE, THE STATE COULD NOT PROSECUTE IN ANY WAY, AND NOW THAT HAS BEEN STATE COULD NOT PROSECUTE IN ANY WAY, AND NOW THAT HAS BEEN OPENED UP.

WAY, AND NOW THAT HAS BEEN OPENED UP.

>> RIGHT.

OPENED UP.

>> RIGHT.

WE'RE GOING TO SWITCH GEARS >> RIGHT.

WE'RE GOING TO SWITCH GEARS AGAIN.

WE'RE GOING TO SWITCH GEARS AGAIN.

UM, I THINK EVERYONE HAS HEARD AGAIN.

UM, I THINK EVERYONE HAS HEARD OF THE DOBBS v. JACKSON WOMEN'S UM, I THINK EVERYONE HAS HEARD OF THE DOBBS v. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION WHICH OF THE DOBBS v. JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION WHICH BASICALLY OVERTURNED ROE V. WADE HEALTH ORGANIZATION WHICH BASICALLY OVERTURNED ROE V. WADE WHICH CAUSED HUGE WAVES ACROSS BASICALLY OVERTURNED ROE V. WADE WHICH CAUSED HUGE WAVES ACROSS AMERICA.

WHICH CAUSED HUGE WAVES ACROSS AMERICA.

I KIND OF WANT TO TALK TO YOU, AMERICA.

I KIND OF WANT TO TALK TO YOU, PROFESSOR TELMAN, AFTER THAT I KIND OF WANT TO TALK TO YOU, PROFESSOR TELMAN, AFTER THAT RULING WAS OVERTURNED, THE PROFESSOR TELMAN, AFTER THAT RULING WAS OVERTURNED, THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE RULING WAS OVERTURNED, THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS SAID WE SHOULD LOOK AT SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS SAID WE SHOULD LOOK AT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THOMAS SAID WE SHOULD LOOK AT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND CONTRACEPTION.

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND CONTRACEPTION.

WHAT WOULD HAPPEN FOR THING IS CONTRACEPTION.

WHAT WOULD HAPPEN FOR THING IS TO LOOK AT THOSE?

WHAT WOULD HAPPEN FOR THING IS TO LOOK AT THOSE?

WHY WOULD THAT BE TIED TO TO LOOK AT THOSE?

WHY WOULD THAT BE TIED TO ROE V. WADE?

WHY WOULD THAT BE TIED TO ROE V. WADE?

>> RIGHT.

ROE V. WADE?

>> RIGHT.

SO, ROE V. WADE WAS BASED ON A >> RIGHT.

SO, ROE V. WADE WAS BASED ON A DOCTRINE CALLED SUBSTANTIVE DUE SO, ROE V. WADE WAS BASED ON A DOCTRINE CALLED SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, FROM WHICH WE DERIVE A DOCTRINE CALLED SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, FROM WHICH WE DERIVE A RIGHT TO PRIVACY.

PROCESS, FROM WHICH WE DERIVE A RIGHT TO PRIVACY.

THEY WERE ALSO PROTECTED UNDER RIGHT TO PRIVACY.

THEY WERE ALSO PROTECTED UNDER THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY DERIVED THEY WERE ALSO PROTECTED UNDER THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY DERIVED FROM SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS.

THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY DERIVED FROM SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS.

SO, UM, JUSTICE THOMAS DOESN'T FROM SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS.

SO, UM, JUSTICE THOMAS DOESN'T LIKE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS SO, UM, JUSTICE THOMAS DOESN'T LIKE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS UNLESS IT HAS TO DO WITH THE LIKE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS UNLESS IT HAS TO DO WITH THE SECOND AMENDMENT, AND SO HE UNLESS IT HAS TO DO WITH THE SECOND AMENDMENT, AND SO HE THINKS NOW THAT WE'VE GOTTEN RID SECOND AMENDMENT, AND SO HE THINKS NOW THAT WE'VE GOTTEN RID OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS WITH THINKS NOW THAT WE'VE GOTTEN RID OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS WITH RESPECT TO ABORTION, MAYBE WE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS WITH RESPECT TO ABORTION, MAYBE WE SHOULD REVISIT THESE OTHER RESPECT TO ABORTION, MAYBE WE SHOULD REVISIT THESE OTHER RULINGS THAT PROTECT THE SHOULD REVISIT THESE OTHER RULINGS THAT PROTECT THE UNPNEUMONIA RATED RIGHTS TO RULINGS THAT PROTECT THE UNPNEUMONIA RATED RIGHTS TO PRIVACY.

UNPNEUMONIA RATED RIGHTS TO PRIVACY.

HE WROTE FOR HIMSELF THE OTHER PRIVACY.

HE WROTE FOR HIMSELF THE OTHER FIVE JUSTICES WHO WERE HE WROTE FOR HIMSELF THE OTHER FIVE JUSTICES WHO WERE COMFORTABLE OVERRULING FIVE JUSTICES WHO WERE COMFORTABLE OVERRULING ROE V. WADE AND CASEY PRETTY COMFORTABLE OVERRULING ROE V. WADE AND CASEY PRETTY MUCH SPECIFICALLY SAID THEY ROE V. WADE AND CASEY PRETTY MUCH SPECIFICALLY SAID THEY DIDN'T THINK THE RULING -- THEY MUCH SPECIFICALLY SAID THEY DIDN'T THINK THE RULING -- THEY SAID ABORTION WAS DIFFERENT, AND DIDN'T THINK THE RULING -- THEY SAID ABORTION WAS DIFFERENT, AND THEY WEREN'T INTERESTED, AT SAID ABORTION WAS DIFFERENT, AND THEY WEREN'T INTERESTED, AT LEAST FOR NOW, IN CHALLENGING THEY WEREN'T INTERESTED, AT LEAST FOR NOW, IN CHALLENGING THOSE OTHER RIGHTS PROTECTED LEAST FOR NOW, IN CHALLENGING THOSE OTHER RIGHTS PROTECTED UNDER THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY.

THOSE OTHER RIGHTS PROTECTED UNDER THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY.

>> Ms. GOLDEN, DO YOU THINK UNDER THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY.

>> Ms. GOLDEN, DO YOU THINK ANYTHING LIKE THAT COULD HAPPEN?

>> Ms. GOLDEN, DO YOU THINK ANYTHING LIKE THAT COULD HAPPEN?

>> I THINK BASED ON ALL THE ANYTHING LIKE THAT COULD HAPPEN?

>> I THINK BASED ON ALL THE LEGAL PRECEDENCE, THAT THIS >> I THINK BASED ON ALL THE LEGAL PRECEDENCE, THAT THIS TERM, THIS COURT HAS IGNORED IN LEGAL PRECEDENCE, THAT THIS TERM, THIS COURT HAS IGNORED IN NUMEROUS RULINGS THAT HAVE COME TERM, THIS COURT HAS IGNORED IN NUMEROUS RULINGS THAT HAVE COME OUT RECENTLY THAT I WOULD NOT BE NUMEROUS RULINGS THAT HAVE COME OUT RECENTLY THAT I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED BECAUSE THEY'RE OUT RECENTLY THAT I WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED BECAUSE THEY'RE OVERTURNING HUNDREDS OF YEARS OF SURPRISED BECAUSE THEY'RE OVERTURNING HUNDREDS OF YEARS OF PRECEDENT AND IT SEEMS LIKE OVERTURNING HUNDREDS OF YEARS OF PRECEDENT AND IT SEEMS LIKE ANYTHING IS FAIR GAME.

PRECEDENT AND IT SEEMS LIKE ANYTHING IS FAIR GAME.

>> CAN I JUST ADD TWO QUICK ANYTHING IS FAIR GAME.

>> CAN I JUST ADD TWO QUICK POINTS.

>> CAN I JUST ADD TWO QUICK POINTS.

ONE IS CONTRACEPTION IS ALREADY POINTS.

ONE IS CONTRACEPTION IS ALREADY UNDER ATTACK PERHAPS ONE IS CONTRACEPTION IS ALREADY UNDER ATTACK PERHAPS ACCIDENTALLY BECAUSE THERE ARE UNDER ATTACK PERHAPS ACCIDENTALLY BECAUSE THERE ARE STATES THAT ARE DEFINING ACCIDENTALLY BECAUSE THERE ARE STATES THAT ARE DEFINING ABORTION AS ANYTHING THAT STATES THAT ARE DEFINING ABORTION AS ANYTHING THAT TERMINATES A PREGNANCY AND ABORTION AS ANYTHING THAT TERMINATES A PREGNANCY AND PREGNANCY BEGINS AT CONCEPTION.

TERMINATES A PREGNANCY AND PREGNANCY BEGINS AT CONCEPTION.

BUT A LOT OF COMMON FORMS OF PREGNANCY BEGINS AT CONCEPTION.

BUT A LOT OF COMMON FORMS OF CONTRACEPTION PREVENT BUT A LOT OF COMMON FORMS OF CONTRACEPTION PREVENT IMPLANTATION OF AN EMBRYO, AND CONTRACEPTION PREVENT IMPLANTATION OF AN EMBRYO, AND THAT WOULD BE, UNDER THESE IMPLANTATION OF AN EMBRYO, AND THAT WOULD BE, UNDER THESE DEFINITIONS, ABORTION.

THAT WOULD BE, UNDER THESE DEFINITIONS, ABORTION.

SO, UNDER THESE STRICT DEFINITIONS, ABORTION.

SO, UNDER THESE STRICT DEFINITIONS OF ABORTION, SOME SO, UNDER THESE STRICT DEFINITIONS OF ABORTION, SOME FORMS OF CONTRACEPTION ARE NOW DEFINITIONS OF ABORTION, SOME FORMS OF CONTRACEPTION ARE NOW BEING CALLED INTO QUESTION.

FORMS OF CONTRACEPTION ARE NOW BEING CALLED INTO QUESTION.

>> SUCH AS WHICH FORMS?

BEING CALLED INTO QUESTION.

>> SUCH AS WHICH FORMS?

>> WELL, THE ORDINARY PILL.

>> SUCH AS WHICH FORMS?

>> WELL, THE ORDINARY PILL.

I MEAN, IT PREVENTS OVULATION, >> WELL, THE ORDINARY PILL.

I MEAN, IT PREVENTS OVULATION, BUT IT ALSO THINS OUT TO UTERINE I MEAN, IT PREVENTS OVULATION, BUT IT ALSO THINS OUT TO UTERINE LINING AS TO PREVENT BUT IT ALSO THINS OUT TO UTERINE LINING AS TO PREVENT IMPLANTATION.

LINING AS TO PREVENT IMPLANTATION.

THAT WOULD INTERFERE.

IMPLANTATION.

THAT WOULD INTERFERE.

THAT WOULD PREVENT A PREGNANCY THAT WOULD INTERFERE.

THAT WOULD PREVENT A PREGNANCY AFTER FERTILIZATION.

THAT WOULD PREVENT A PREGNANCY AFTER FERTILIZATION.

THE OTHER POINT I WANTED TO MAKE AFTER FERTILIZATION.

THE OTHER POINT I WANTED TO MAKE AND MAYBE THIS SEGUES TO THE THE OTHER POINT I WANTED TO MAKE AND MAYBE THIS SEGUES TO THE OTHER CASES YOU WANT TO TALK AND MAYBE THIS SEGUES TO THE OTHER CASES YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT, I DON'T THINK THE COURT OTHER CASES YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT, I DON'T THINK THE COURT WILL GO AFTER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ABOUT, I DON'T THINK THE COURT WILL GO AFTER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DIRECTLY BUT WHITTLING WAY WILL GO AFTER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DIRECTLY BUT WHITTLING WAY PROTECTIONS THROUGH THE FREE DIRECTLY BUT WHITTLING WAY PROTECTIONS THROUGH THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE.

PROTECTIONS THROUGH THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE.

THIS COURT IS FINE WITH ALLOWING EXERCISE CLAUSE.

THIS COURT IS FINE WITH ALLOWING RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS FROM ANY THIS COURT IS FINE WITH ALLOWING RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS FROM ANY NEUTRAL LAW OF GENERAL RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS FROM ANY NEUTRAL LAW OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY INCLUDING LAWS NEUTRAL LAW OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY INCLUDING LAWS THAT PROTECT ON LGBTQ.

APPLICABILITY INCLUDING LAWS THAT PROTECT ON LGBTQ.

>> THAT TAKES TO OUR NEXT CASE.

THAT PROTECT ON LGBTQ.

>> THAT TAKES TO OUR NEXT CASE.

I WANT TO EXAMINE A SCHOOL >> THAT TAKES TO OUR NEXT CASE.

I WANT TO EXAMINE A SCHOOL DISTRICT IN CARSON v. MAY CAN.

I WANT TO EXAMINE A SCHOOL DISTRICT IN CARSON v. MAY CAN.

AGAIN, EVERYONE IS AVAILABLE DISTRICT IN CARSON v. MAY CAN.

AGAIN, EVERYONE IS AVAILABLE WITH THE PRAYER ON THE FIELD AGAIN, EVERYONE IS AVAILABLE WITH THE PRAYER ON THE FIELD RULING.

WITH THE PRAYER ON THE FIELD RULING.

HOW MUCH DO THESE CASES IMPACT RULING.

HOW MUCH DO THESE CASES IMPACT SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE HOW MUCH DO THESE CASES IMPACT SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IN YOUR OPINION?

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IN YOUR OPINION?

>> I THINK BETWEEN THAT ONE AND IN YOUR OPINION?

>> I THINK BETWEEN THAT ONE AND THE ONE WHERE NOW THE TAX -- AT >> I THINK BETWEEN THAT ONE AND THE ONE WHERE NOW THE TAX -- AT A TAX DOLLARS CAN GO TO THE ONE WHERE NOW THE TAX -- AT A TAX DOLLARS CAN GO TO RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS KIND OF OPENS A TAX DOLLARS CAN GO TO RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS KIND OF OPENS THE WALL OF SEPARATION OF CHURCH RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS KIND OF OPENS THE WALL OF SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE BECAUSE THE PRAYER ON THE WALL OF SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE BECAUSE THE PRAYER ON THE FIELD CONCEPT IS LIMITING AND STATE BECAUSE THE PRAYER ON THE FIELD CONCEPT IS LIMITING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

THE FIELD CONCEPT IS LIMITING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

ALSO, IS DOUBLE -- IT GOES TO THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

ALSO, IS DOUBLE -- IT GOES TO THE 50-YARD LINE AND PRAYS ALSO, IS DOUBLE -- IT GOES TO THE 50-YARD LINE AND PRAYS PUBLICLY.

THE 50-YARD LINE AND PRAYS PUBLICLY.

IF THAT WERE, I'M SORRY, A PUBLICLY.

IF THAT WERE, I'M SORRY, A MUSLIM OR SOME OTHER RELIGION, IF THAT WERE, I'M SORRY, A MUSLIM OR SOME OTHER RELIGION, HOW WELL RECEIVED WOULD THAT MUSLIM OR SOME OTHER RELIGION, HOW WELL RECEIVED WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN?

HOW WELL RECEIVED WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN?

SO, WE'RE IMPEDING HIS FREEDOM HAVE BEEN?

SO, WE'RE IMPEDING HIS FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY NOT ALLOWING HIM TO SO, WE'RE IMPEDING HIS FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY NOT ALLOWING HIM TO PRAY ON THE FIELD.

OF SPEECH BY NOT ALLOWING HIM TO PRAY ON THE FIELD.

THAT WAS THE RULING, IN ESSENCE.

PRAY ON THE FIELD.

THAT WAS THE RULING, IN ESSENCE.

AND NOBODY THAT WANTS TO SEE A THAT WAS THE RULING, IN ESSENCE.

AND NOBODY THAT WANTS TO SEE A DIFFERENT OF PRAYER, WE WILL AND NOBODY THAT WANTS TO SEE A DIFFERENT OF PRAYER, WE WILL HAVE A LOT MORE PEOPLE COMING TO DIFFERENT OF PRAYER, WE WILL HAVE A LOT MORE PEOPLE COMING TO THE CENTER -- 50-YARD LINE AND HAVE A LOT MORE PEOPLE COMING TO THE CENTER -- 50-YARD LINE AND DOING THAT.

THE CENTER -- 50-YARD LINE AND DOING THAT.

I THINK THIS OPENS THE DOOR.

DOING THAT.

I THINK THIS OPENS THE DOOR.

IT'S, OF COURSE, THAT WALL OF I THINK THIS OPENS THE DOOR.

IT'S, OF COURSE, THAT WALL OF SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IT'S, OF COURSE, THAT WALL OF SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE HAS BEEN WHITTLED AWAY, CHIPPED SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE HAS BEEN WHITTLED AWAY, CHIPPED AT, AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH HAS HAS BEEN WHITTLED AWAY, CHIPPED AT, AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH HAS OPENED UP A LOT MORE THAN AT, AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH HAS OPENED UP A LOT MORE THAN PROBABLY WHAT WAS INTENDED IN OPENED UP A LOT MORE THAN PROBABLY WHAT WAS INTENDED IN ALLOWING THAT.

PROBABLY WHAT WAS INTENDED IN ALLOWING THAT.

>> PROFESSOR TELMAN, DO YOU ALLOWING THAT.

>> PROFESSOR TELMAN, DO YOU THINK FOLKS WILL MAKE A POINT BY >> PROFESSOR TELMAN, DO YOU THINK FOLKS WILL MAKE A POINT BY GOING TO 50-YARD LINE AND THINK FOLKS WILL MAKE A POINT BY GOING TO 50-YARD LINE AND PRAYING?

GOING TO 50-YARD LINE AND PRAYING?

>> SO, I DO THINK THAT A LOT OF PRAYING?

>> SO, I DO THINK THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE NOW GOING TO BE >> SO, I DO THINK THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE NOW GOING TO BE MOTIVATED TO PUSH THE BARRIERS PEOPLE ARE NOW GOING TO BE MOTIVATED TO PUSH THE BARRIERS AND TO SEE HOW FAR THEY CAN GO MOTIVATED TO PUSH THE BARRIERS AND TO SEE HOW FAR THEY CAN GO IN TERMS OF PUBLIC PRAYER AT AND TO SEE HOW FAR THEY CAN GO IN TERMS OF PUBLIC PRAYER AT PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

IN TERMS OF PUBLIC PRAYER AT PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

A LOT OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

A LOT OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE MAJORITY AND THE DISSENT IN A LOT OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE MAJORITY AND THE DISSENT IN THE KENNEDY CASE, THE CASE OF THE MAJORITY AND THE DISSENT IN THE KENNEDY CASE, THE CASE OF THE COACH, IS REALLY A DISPUTE THE KENNEDY CASE, THE CASE OF THE COACH, IS REALLY A DISPUTE ABOUT THE FACTS.

THE COACH, IS REALLY A DISPUTE ABOUT THE FACTS.

THE MAJORITY DESCRIBES THIS AS ABOUT THE FACTS.

THE MAJORITY DESCRIBES THIS AS PRIVATE PRAYER, BUT JUSTICE THE MAJORITY DESCRIBES THIS AS PRIVATE PRAYER, BUT JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR IN HER DISSENT, PRIVATE PRAYER, BUT JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR IN HER DISSENT, INCLUDED AN IMAGE OF THE COACH SOTOMAYOR IN HER DISSENT, INCLUDED AN IMAGE OF THE COACH SURROUNDED BY STUDENTS AT THE INCLUDED AN IMAGE OF THE COACH SURROUNDED BY STUDENTS AT THE 50-YARD LINE, WEARING HIS SCHOOL SURROUNDED BY STUDENTS AT THE 50-YARD LINE, WEARING HIS SCHOOL UNIFORM AND HOLDING UP THE 50-YARD LINE, WEARING HIS SCHOOL UNIFORM AND HOLDING UP THE FOOTBALL HELMET OF TEAM, ALL OF UNIFORM AND HOLDING UP THE FOOTBALL HELMET OF TEAM, ALL OF WHICH, YOU KNOW, IN OLDER CASE FOOTBALL HELMET OF TEAM, ALL OF WHICH, YOU KNOW, IN OLDER CASE LAW WOULD HAVE CLEARLY WHICH, YOU KNOW, IN OLDER CASE LAW WOULD HAVE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED THAT PRAYER AS A LAW WOULD HAVE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED THAT PRAYER AS A PUBLIC ACT BY A PUBLIC FIGURE, IDENTIFIED THAT PRAYER AS A PUBLIC ACT BY A PUBLIC FIGURE, UM, AND WOULD HAVE CALLED INTO PUBLIC ACT BY A PUBLIC FIGURE, UM, AND WOULD HAVE CALLED INTO QUESTION THE ESTABLISHMENT UM, AND WOULD HAVE CALLED INTO QUESTION THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE WHICH PROHIBITS QUESTION THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE WHICH PROHIBITS GOVERNMENT ENDORSEMENTS OF CLAUSE WHICH PROHIBITS GOVERNMENT ENDORSEMENTS OF RELIGION.

GOVERNMENT ENDORSEMENTS OF RELIGION.

>> ALL RIGHT.

RELIGION.

>> ALL RIGHT.

I HAVE SO MANY MORE QUESTIONS >> ALL RIGHT.

I HAVE SO MANY MORE QUESTIONS I'D LIKE TO ASK, BUT THAT'S OUR I HAVE SO MANY MORE QUESTIONS I'D LIKE TO ASK, BUT THAT'S OUR TIME.

I'D LIKE TO ASK, BUT THAT'S OUR TIME.

I HOPE TO HAVE YOU BACK TO TIME.

I HOPE TO HAVE YOU BACK TO ADDRESS MORE AND A LOT OF BIG I HOPE TO HAVE YOU BACK TO ADDRESS MORE AND A LOT OF BIG DECISIONS THAT CAME DOWN TODAY, ADDRESS MORE AND A LOT OF BIG DECISIONS THAT CAME DOWN TODAY, A LOT FOR EVERYONE TO SIFT DECISIONS THAT CAME DOWN TODAY, A LOT FOR EVERYONE TO SIFT THROUGH, ESPECIALLY IN THE LEGAL A LOT FOR EVERYONE TO SIFT THROUGH, ESPECIALLY IN THE LEGAL FIELD.

THROUGH, ESPECIALLY IN THE LEGAL FIELD.

THANK YOU, BOTH, FOR YOUR TIME FIELD.

THANK YOU, BOTH, FOR YOUR TIME AND INSIGHT.

THANK YOU, BOTH, FOR YOUR TIME AND INSIGHT.

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

AND INSIGHT.

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

>> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

>> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.

IT'S AN HONOR.

>> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.

IT'S AN HONOR.

>> SEUSS, -- SUSAN, GUESTS IT'S AN HONOR.

>> SEUSS, -- SUSAN, GUESTS THANK YOU.

>> SEUSS, -- SUSAN, GUESTS THANK YOU.

-- INCLUDING IN PENNSYLVANIA, THANK YOU.

-- INCLUDING IN PENNSYLVANIA, HOME TO HUNDREDS OF ABANDONED -- INCLUDING IN PENNSYLVANIA, HOME TO HUNDREDS OF ABANDONED COAL MINES IN NEED OF CLEANUP.

HOME TO HUNDREDS OF ABANDONED COAL MINES IN NEED OF CLEANUP.

THIS WEEK'S NATIONAL VIEW, WE COAL MINES IN NEED OF CLEANUP.

THIS WEEK'S NATIONAL VIEW, WE LEARN HOW PROFESSORS AND THIS WEEK'S NATIONAL VIEW, WE LEARN HOW PROFESSORS AND STUDENTS AT PENN STATE ARE LEARN HOW PROFESSORS AND STUDENTS AT PENN STATE ARE TEAMING UP TO RECLAIM WASTE STUDENTS AT PENN STATE ARE TEAMING UP TO RECLAIM WASTE SITES WITH THE HELP OF SOMETHING TEAMING UP TO RECLAIM WASTE SITES WITH THE HELP OF SOMETHING YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE.

SITES WITH THE HELP OF SOMETHING YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE.

>> IN THE MASSIVE COAL FIELDS OF YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE.

>> IN THE MASSIVE COAL FIELDS OF PENNSYLVANIA, SCARS FROM THE >> IN THE MASSIVE COAL FIELDS OF PENNSYLVANIA, SCARS FROM THE MINING INDUSTRY CAN BE SEEN PENNSYLVANIA, SCARS FROM THE MINING INDUSTRY CAN BE SEEN ALONG THE RIVERS AND STREAMS.

MINING INDUSTRY CAN BE SEEN ALONG THE RIVERS AND STREAMS.

AT ITS HEIGHT, COAL MINING ALONG THE RIVERS AND STREAMS.

AT ITS HEIGHT, COAL MINING FUELED THE INDUSTRIAL AT ITS HEIGHT, COAL MINING FUELED THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, BUT IT ALSO LEFT FUELED THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, BUT IT ALSO LEFT BEHIND THOUSANDS OF MINES THAT REVOLUTION, BUT IT ALSO LEFT BEHIND THOUSANDS OF MINES THAT CONTINUE TO POLLUTE THE BEHIND THOUSANDS OF MINES THAT CONTINUE TO POLLUTE THE ENVIRONMENT WITH ACID MINE CONTINUE TO POLLUTE THE ENVIRONMENT WITH ACID MINE DRAINAGE.

ENVIRONMENT WITH ACID MINE DRAINAGE.

>> THE COAL MINE DRAINAGE IS A DRAINAGE.

>> THE COAL MINE DRAINAGE IS A CHALLENGE BECAUSE SO MANY OF THE >> THE COAL MINE DRAINAGE IS A CHALLENGE BECAUSE SO MANY OF THE OPERATIONS THAT CREATED THE CHALLENGE BECAUSE SO MANY OF THE OPERATIONS THAT CREATED THE PROBLEM HAVE GONE BANKRUPT AND OPERATIONS THAT CREATED THE PROBLEM HAVE GONE BANKRUPT AND AREN'T THERE ANY MORE TO DEAL PROBLEM HAVE GONE BANKRUPT AND AREN'T THERE ANY MORE TO DEAL WITH IT.

AREN'T THERE ANY MORE TO DEAL WITH IT.

AND, THEY'VE GENERATED A WITH IT.

AND, THEY'VE GENERATED A POLLUTANT SOURCE THAT COULD LAST AND, THEY'VE GENERATED A POLLUTANT SOURCE THAT COULD LAST FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS.

POLLUTANT SOURCE THAT COULD LAST FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS.

>> PENN STATE PROFESSORS FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS.

>> PENN STATE PROFESSORS BILLBERGOS AND JENNIFER ARE PART >> PENN STATE PROFESSORS BILLBERGOS AND JENNIFER ARE PART OF A RESEARCH EFFORT TO FIND AND BILLBERGOS AND JENNIFER ARE PART OF A RESEARCH EFFORT TO FIND AND DEVELOP MORE EFFECTIVE OF A RESEARCH EFFORT TO FIND AND DEVELOP MORE EFFECTIVE REMEDIATION.

DEVELOP MORE EFFECTIVE REMEDIATION.

>> WE HAVE A TEAM OF PEOPLE THAT REMEDIATION.

>> WE HAVE A TEAM OF PEOPLE THAT INCLUDES ENGINEERS, >> WE HAVE A TEAM OF PEOPLE THAT INCLUDES ENGINEERS, HYDROLOGISTS, MICROBIOLOGISTS TO INCLUDES ENGINEERS, HYDROLOGISTS, MICROBIOLOGISTS TO DO THIS IMPORTANT JOB TO CLEAN HYDROLOGISTS, MICROBIOLOGISTS TO DO THIS IMPORTANT JOB TO CLEAN UP ACID MINE DRAINAGE.

DO THIS IMPORTANT JOB TO CLEAN UP ACID MINE DRAINAGE.

>> THE LEGACY OF THE COAL MINING UP ACID MINE DRAINAGE.

>> THE LEGACY OF THE COAL MINING OPERATIONS HAS BASICALLY TAKEN >> THE LEGACY OF THE COAL MINING OPERATIONS HAS BASICALLY TAKEN ROCK THAT WAS STABLE AND EXPOSED OPERATIONS HAS BASICALLY TAKEN ROCK THAT WAS STABLE AND EXPOSED TO IT AIR AND WATER LEADING TO ROCK THAT WAS STABLE AND EXPOSED TO IT AIR AND WATER LEADING TO THE REACTIONS THAT PRODUCE THE TO IT AIR AND WATER LEADING TO THE REACTIONS THAT PRODUCE THE DRAINAGE.

THE REACTIONS THAT PRODUCE THE DRAINAGE.

>> THIS IS THE AIR SHAFT OF AN DRAINAGE.

>> THIS IS THE AIR SHAFT OF AN ABANDONED UNDERGROUND COAL MINE.

>> THIS IS THE AIR SHAFT OF AN ABANDONED UNDERGROUND COAL MINE.

THE ORANGE WATER COMING OUT OF ABANDONED UNDERGROUND COAL MINE.

THE ORANGE WATER COMING OUT OF THE GROUND IS ACIDIC AND STEEPED THE ORANGE WATER COMING OUT OF THE GROUND IS ACIDIC AND STEEPED WITH IRON, ALUMINUM AND MAG THE GROUND IS ACIDIC AND STEEPED WITH IRON, ALUMINUM AND MAG ANESE.

WITH IRON, ALUMINUM AND MAG ANESE.

IT'S RUN THROUGH CHANNELS TO ANESE.

IT'S RUN THROUGH CHANNELS TO NEUTRALIZE THE ACIDITY AND IT'S RUN THROUGH CHANNELS TO NEUTRALIZE THE ACIDITY AND REMOVE HEAVY METALS.

NEUTRALIZE THE ACIDITY AND REMOVE HEAVY METALS.

>> WHEN CROW -- YOU ARE REMOVE HEAVY METALS.

>> WHEN CROW -- YOU ARE TRAVELING OVER LANDSCAPES, YOU >> WHEN CROW -- YOU ARE TRAVELING OVER LANDSCAPES, YOU WILL SEE LARGE KILL ZONES WHERE TRAVELING OVER LANDSCAPES, YOU WILL SEE LARGE KILL ZONES WHERE THERE ARE NO VEGETATION, DEAD WILL SEE LARGE KILL ZONES WHERE THERE ARE NO VEGETATION, DEAD TREES, NOT MUCH LIFE.

THERE ARE NO VEGETATION, DEAD TREES, NOT MUCH LIFE.

THE COLOR IS OFTEN VERY RED AND TREES, NOT MUCH LIFE.

THE COLOR IS OFTEN VERY RED AND THAT RED COLOR IS ACTUALLY A THE COLOR IS OFTEN VERY RED AND THAT RED COLOR IS ACTUALLY A RESULT OF TREATMENT.

THAT RED COLOR IS ACTUALLY A RESULT OF TREATMENT.

IT'S THE RESULT OF IRON BEING RESULT OF TREATMENT.

IT'S THE RESULT OF IRON BEING OXIDIZED AND BEING IMMOBILIZED IT'S THE RESULT OF IRON BEING OXIDIZED AND BEING IMMOBILIZED IN SORT OF WHAT WE'RE CALLING AN OXIDIZED AND BEING IMMOBILIZED IN SORT OF WHAT WE'RE CALLING AN IRON MOUND.

IN SORT OF WHAT WE'RE CALLING AN IRON MOUND.

WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN THE IRON MOUND.

WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN THE FUTURE IS A COMBINATION OF WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IN THE FUTURE IS A COMBINATION OF EXISTING TYPES OF PASSIVE FUTURE IS A COMBINATION OF EXISTING TYPES OF PASSIVE TREATMENT IN WHICH WE USE EXISTING TYPES OF PASSIVE TREATMENT IN WHICH WE USE NATURAL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES OF TREATMENT IN WHICH WE USE NATURAL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES OF THE SORT THAT ARE CREATING IRON NATURAL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES OF THE SORT THAT ARE CREATING IRON MOUNDS.

THE SORT THAT ARE CREATING IRON MOUNDS.

THOSE COMMUNITIES CAN REMOVE MOUNDS.

THOSE COMMUNITIES CAN REMOVE MOST OF THE IRON AT A LOW PH AND THOSE COMMUNITIES CAN REMOVE MOST OF THE IRON AT A LOW PH AND THAT IS A MAGICAL ABILITY THAT MOST OF THE IRON AT A LOW PH AND THAT IS A MAGICAL ABILITY THAT WE CAN USE AS A COMPONENT OF THAT IS A MAGICAL ABILITY THAT WE CAN USE AS A COMPONENT OF PASSIVE TREATMENT TO IMPROVE WE CAN USE AS A COMPONENT OF PASSIVE TREATMENT TO IMPROVE THEIR EFFICIENCY.

PASSIVE TREATMENT TO IMPROVE THEIR EFFICIENCY.

>> EVEN FINDING AND GETTING TO THEIR EFFICIENCY.

>> EVEN FINDING AND GETTING TO THE MANY SOURCES OF POLLUTION IS >> EVEN FINDING AND GETTING TO THE MANY SOURCES OF POLLUTION IS GOING TO BE A CHALLENGE.

THE MANY SOURCES OF POLLUTION IS GOING TO BE A CHALLENGE.

TO THAT END, THEY WORK WITH GOING TO BE A CHALLENGE.

TO THAT END, THEY WORK WITH STAKEHOLDER CITIZEN GROUPS LIKE TO THAT END, THEY WORK WITH STAKEHOLDER CITIZEN GROUPS LIKE THE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION.

STAKEHOLDER CITIZEN GROUPS LIKE THE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION.

>> LOOKING AT THE CREEK THE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION.

>> LOOKING AT THE CREEK TRIBUTARIES, LIKE THE VEINS OF A >> LOOKING AT THE CREEK TRIBUTARIES, LIKE THE VEINS OF A LEAF, YOU CAN SEE THE AREAS WEST TRIBUTARIES, LIKE THE VEINS OF A LEAF, YOU CAN SEE THE AREAS WEST IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY ACID LEAF, YOU CAN SEE THE AREAS WEST IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY ACID MINE DRAINAGE.

IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY ACID MINE DRAINAGE.

THEY'RE TARGETING CLEANUP MINE DRAINAGE.

THEY'RE TARGETING CLEANUP EFFORTS.

THEY'RE TARGETING CLEANUP EFFORTS.

>> WHAT YOU NEED TO DO IS BREAK EFFORTS.

>> WHAT YOU NEED TO DO IS BREAK THAT LEAF UP INTO SECTIONS, >> WHAT YOU NEED TO DO IS BREAK THAT LEAF UP INTO SECTIONS, MEASURING FLOW AND MEASURING THAT LEAF UP INTO SECTIONS, MEASURING FLOW AND MEASURING CHEMISTRY AT DIFFERENT SPOTS MEASURING FLOW AND MEASURING CHEMISTRY AT DIFFERENT SPOTS ACROSS THE LEAF TO FIGURE OUT CHEMISTRY AT DIFFERENT SPOTS ACROSS THE LEAF TO FIGURE OUT AND SPATIALLY IDENTIFY THE WORST ACROSS THE LEAF TO FIGURE OUT AND SPATIALLY IDENTIFY THE WORST POLLUTANT SOURCES.

AND SPATIALLY IDENTIFY THE WORST POLLUTANT SOURCES.

IDEALLY, IF THERE IS ASSISTANCE POLLUTANT SOURCES.

IDEALLY, IF THERE IS ASSISTANCE WE CAN REMEDIATE SOME OF THESE IDEALLY, IF THERE IS ASSISTANCE WE CAN REMEDIATE SOME OF THESE SOURCES, THAT'S WHAT WE WANT TO WE CAN REMEDIATE SOME OF THESE SOURCES, THAT'S WHAT WE WANT TO DO IN THE FUTURE.

SOURCES, THAT'S WHAT WE WANT TO DO IN THE FUTURE.

>> ON THE NEXT "THE OKLAHOMA DO IN THE FUTURE.

>> ON THE NEXT "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT," OKLAHOMA HAS >> ON THE NEXT "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT," OKLAHOMA HAS RECORDED ITS FIRST WEST NILE NEWS REPORT," OKLAHOMA HAS RECORDED ITS FIRST WEST NILE DEATH OF THE YEAR.

RECORDED ITS FIRST WEST NILE DEATH OF THE YEAR.

THAT IMPACTS BOTH PEOPLE AND DEATH OF THE YEAR.

THAT IMPACTS BOTH PEOPLE AND LIVESTOCK.

THAT IMPACTS BOTH PEOPLE AND LIVESTOCK.

WHAT'S BEING DONE TO PREPARE FOR LIVESTOCK.

WHAT'S BEING DONE TO PREPARE FOR MORE INFECTIONS AROUND THE WHAT'S BEING DONE TO PREPARE FOR MORE INFECTIONS AROUND THE STATE?

MORE INFECTIONS AROUND THE STATE?

STEVE SHAW REPORTS.

STATE?

STEVE SHAW REPORTS.

WE SAY SO LONG FOR NOW WITH A STEVE SHAW REPORTS.

WE SAY SO LONG FOR NOW WITH A LOOK AT ROGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN'S WE SAY SO LONG FOR NOW WITH A LOOK AT ROGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN'S CAROUSEL AT THE OKLAHOMA CITY LOOK AT ROGERS AND HAMMERSTEIN'S CAROUSEL AT THE OKLAHOMA CITY CIVIC CENTER PRODUCED BY THE CAROUSEL AT THE OKLAHOMA CITY CIVIC CENTER PRODUCED BY THE LYRIC THEATER OF OKLAHOMA.

CIVIC CENTER PRODUCED BY THE LYRIC THEATER OF OKLAHOMA.

FOR ALL OF US HERE AT "THE LYRIC THEATER OF OKLAHOMA.

FOR ALL OF US HERE AT "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT," I'M JASON FOR ALL OF US HERE AT "THE OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT," I'M JASON DOYLE.

OKLAHOMA NEWS REPORT," I'M JASON DOYLE.

STAY TUNED TO O.E.T.A.

DOYLE.

STAY TUNED TO O.E.T.A.

[ ] [ ]