
Knesset Member: Gaza Crisis “Could Not Happen” Without U.S.
Clip: 3/20/2024 | 18m 19sVideo has Closed Captions
Ofer Cassif joins the show.
Left-wing Israeli lawmaker Ofer Cassif is a passionate opponent of West Bank settlement, and of Netanyahu's handling of the war. Cassif strongly believes a political solution is needed. He joins Michel Martin to explain why, and how, he survived a recent effort to impeach him.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback

Knesset Member: Gaza Crisis “Could Not Happen” Without U.S.
Clip: 3/20/2024 | 18m 19sVideo has Closed Captions
Left-wing Israeli lawmaker Ofer Cassif is a passionate opponent of West Bank settlement, and of Netanyahu's handling of the war. Cassif strongly believes a political solution is needed. He joins Michel Martin to explain why, and how, he survived a recent effort to impeach him.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
How to Watch Amanpour and Company
Amanpour and Company is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.

Watch Amanpour and Company on PBS
PBS and WNET, in collaboration with CNN, launched Amanpour and Company in September 2018. The series features wide-ranging, in-depth conversations with global thought leaders and cultural influencers on issues impacting the world each day, from politics, business, technology and arts, to science and sports.Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorship>>> NOW, AS WE REPORTED EARLIER, THERE ARE LOUD AND DIFFERING VOICES WITHIN IRAN ON THE SO-CALLED DAY AFTER THE WAR.
WE HEARD THE EXTREME SETTLER VIEW EARLIER.
AND LEFT WING LAWMAKER OFER CASSIF IS JUST AS PASSIONATE ABOUT OPPOSING THAT, AND OPPOSING NETANYAHU'S HANDLING OF THE WAR.
STRESSING THE NEED FOR A POLITICAL SOLUTION.
AND HE JOINS MICHEL MARTIN NOW TO EXPLAIN WHY, AND HOW HE SURVIVED THE RECENT EFFORT TO IMPEACH HIM.
>> THANKS, CHRISTIANE.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SPEAKING US WITH.
>> THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME, MY PLEASURE AND HONOR.
>> BEFORE WE GET INTO RECENT EVENTS, I WANTED TO GO BACK A LITTLE BIT, TO LAST MONTH.
YOU'VE BEEN VERY CRITICAL OF THE NETANYAHU GOVERNMENT.
YOU HAVE ARGUED AND YOU HAVE MADE NO SECRET OF THE FACT THAT YOU THINK THAT THIS GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN ENGAGING IN MANY SORT OF ANTI-DEMOCRATIC EFFORTS, TRYING TO SILENCE DISSENT, SILENCE ANY CRITICISM, CRACKING DOWN ON PUBLIC DEMONSTRATIONS THAT WOULD BE CUSTOMARY IN A DEMOCRACY.
HOW DID YOU FIND OUT -- AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS YOUR FELLOW KNESSET MEMBERS THAT WOULD MOVE TO IMPEACH YOU, BUT HOW DID YOU FIND OUT THAT THEY WERE MOVING TO IMPEACH YOU?
>> WELL, THE RECENT LAW IN ISRAEL THAT WAS ENACTED IN 2016 THAT ALLOWS A MAJORITY OF 90 MEMBERS OF THE KNESSET OUT OF 120 TO IMPEACH ANOTHER MEMBER OF THE KNESSET IF ONE IS ACCUSED IN EITHER BEING SUPPORTING RACISM AND SUPPORTING AN ARMED STRUGGLE AGAINST ISRAEL.
AFTER I SIGNED THIS ME SITUATION, WHICH I GUESS WE WILL DISCUSS LATER ABOUT, I REALIZED THAT ONE MEMBER OF THE KNESSET, FAR-RIGHT MEMBER OF THE KNESSET, BEGAN IN GETTING SIGNATURES FROM OTHER MEMBERS OF THE KNESSET IN ORDER TO BEGIN A MOTION TO IMPEACH ME.
SO, THAT'S HOW I KNEW ABOUT IT, AND THE REST IS FOR HISTORY, MORE OR LESS.
>> THE SPECIFIC ACTION THAT YOU WERE ACCUSED OF IS IN RELATION TO YOUR DECISION TO SUPPORT THE PETITION TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT THAT WOULD HAVE INVESTIGATED ISRAEL IN RELATION TO ITS ACTIONS IN GAZA.
YOU KNOW, SOUTH AFRICA HAS ASKED FOR ISRAEL TO BE INVESTIGATED.
AND YOU SAID THAT YOU FEEL THAT THIS WAS AN APPROPRIATE THING TO DO.
AS BRIEFLY AS YOU CAN, WHY DID YOU FEEL THAT THAT WAS IMPORTANT TO DO?
>> WELL, FIRST OF ALL, YOU KNOW, I DO NOT TRUST ANY GOVERNMENT TO INVESTIGATE ITSELF.
IT'S NOT ONLY THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT, BUT ANY GOVERNMENT.
I THINK THAT THE BASIS OF DEMOCRACY IS THAT ANYONE SHOULD CAST DOUBT ON ONE'S OWN GOVERNMENT.
SINCE 1949, THE STATE OF ISRAEL ITSELF JOINED TO THIS CONVENTION ON GENOCIDE AND ACTUALLY RECOGNIZING THEM IN INVESTIGATING SUCH ACCUSATIONS, SO, FOR ME, IT WAS VERY CLEAR THAT THE ICJ IS THE AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE THE ONGOING IN GAZA, NOT THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT ITSELF.
THAT WAS ONE THING.
THE OTHER IS THAT IN THE APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA, AS WELL AS IN THE PETITION THAT I JOINED, EVENTUALLY, BY THE WAY, THERE WERE ALMOST 1,000 ISRAELI CITIZENS WHO SIGNED THIS PETITION, THERE WAS A VERY CLEAR CALL TO STOP THE WAR.
WE ALL KNOW THAT THE DEATH TOLL OF PALESTINIANS IN GAZA IS MORE THAN 30,000.
AND THERE ARE ALSO ISRAELI SOLDIERS AND HOSTAGES.
WE WANT EVERYONE TO -- TO LIVE.
WE DON'T WANT VICTIMS ANYMORE.
SO, IT WAS VERY CLEAR FOR ME, BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL IS NOT INTERESTED IN THE LIVES OF ANYONE, NEITHER THE ISRAELIS, LET ALONE THE PALESTINIANS, SO, I FOUND MYSELF OBLIGED TO APPEAL TO AN INTERNATIONAL -- ICJ.
>> THE EFFORT TO IMPEACH YOU FAILED.
IT DID RECEIVE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF VOTES, BUT NOT ENOUGH TO OBVIOUSLY MOVE FORWARD WITH THE IMPEACHMENT.
YOU CLEARLY HAVE NOT BEEN COWED BY THIS, I MEAN, THIS WEEK, YOU GAVE A SPEECH ON THE FLOOR IN SUPPORT OF THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION'S SANCTIONS AGAINST SETTLERS IN THE WEST BANK.
WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THAT IS THE RIGHT COURSE OF ACTION?
WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION TO PLACE SANCTIONS ON THESE SETTLERS?
AS YOU KNOW, IT'S VERY CONTROVERSIAL, FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS, MANY PEOPLE THINK IT'S SORT OF MINIMALIST, SOME PEOPLE THINK IT'S THE WRONG PEOPLE, SOME PEOPLE THINK IT'S A BAND AID, IT DOESN'T REALLY ADDRESS THE SITUATION.
MANY OPINIONS, BUT WHY DO YOU THINK IT WAS AN APPROPRIATE COURSE OF ACTION?
>> I MAY UPSET ALL THE THINGS YOU SAID, BUT STILL, IT DOESN'T RULE OUT THE SANCTIONS.
I AGREE THAT THE MAIN, YOU KNOW, BODY, THAT SHOULD BE SANCTIONED IS THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT.
THE GOVERNMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ONGOING PROBLEMS THAT SETTLERS CARRY OUT AGAINST PALESTINIANS IN THE WEST BANK.
LOOK, I WANT TO BE VERY, VERY BLUNT AND VERY, VERY CLEAR -- THERE IS AN ETHNIC CLEANSING GOING ON IN THE WEST BANK.
BEFORE THE MASSACRE OF 7th OF OCTOBER.
LITERALLY THREE, FOUR DAYS BEFORE THE MASSACRE, THE TERRIBLE MASSACRE, THE CRIMINAL MASSACRE THAT HAMAS COMMITTED, IN WHICH I PERSONALLY LOST SOME FRIENDS, IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO SAY THAT I -- WE TOTALLY CONDEMN IT, BECAUSE, AGAIN, SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT IF I'M AGAINST THE WAR AND AGAINST THE OCCUPATION, THAT MEANS THAT I SUPPORT THE CRIMES OF HAMAS, ABSOLUTELY NOT.
SO, I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR ABOUT THAT, TOO.
SO, THREE OR FOUR DAYS BEFORE THE MASSACRE COMMITTED BY HAMAS, I VISITED THE JORDAN VALLEY, SOME PASTORS COMMUNITIES OF PALESTINIANS IN THE WEST BANK AND I REALIZED THEN THAT ALREADY FOUR COMMUNITIES WERE TOTALLY ELIMINATED.
THEY HAD TO FLEE, BECAUSE OF THE ONGOING DAILY PROBLEMS COMMITTED BY SETTLERS.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A SIZE, A TERRITORY DOUBLE THE CITY OF TEL AVIV.
AND SINCE OCTOBER 7th, IT RISES INTO COMMUNITIES THAT -- >> WHAT ARE YOU SAYING?
YOU'RE SAYING THAT IN THE WEST BANK, WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT GAZA -- >> I'M TALKING ABOUT THE WEST BANK.
>> YOU BELIEVE THE SETTLERS ARE MAKING AN EFFORT TO DRIVE PALESTINIANS OUT -- >> SUCCESSFULLY.
>> BY FORCE.
>> SUCCESSFUL EFFORTS.
MORE THAN 20 COMMUNITIES, PALESTINIAN COMMUNITIES OF INNOCENT SHEPHERDS, POOR PEOPLE.
I VISITED.
I KNOW MANY OF THEM.
PERSONALLY.
GOOD PEOPLE.
HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH, YOU KNOW, VIOLENCE OR WHATEVER.
THEY ARE ASSAULTED ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS, A DAILY BASIS, FOR YEARS, ACTUALLY.
IT'S BEEN MORE THAN -- EXACTLY ONE YEAR SINCE I FIRST SENT A LETTER TO THE DEFENSE MINISTER OF ISRAEL.
I SAID TO HIM, AS A MEMBER OF THE KNESSET, I SAID, THERE ARE PROBLEMS GOING ON BY SETTLERS AGAINST THE PALESTINIANS IN THE WEST BANK.
PLEASE STOP IT.
YOU HAVE TO STOP IT FIRST, BECAUSE IT'S CRIMINAL, AND SECONDLY, BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BLOW UP -- EVERYBODY'S GOING TO PAY THE PRICE.
THERE'S GOING TO BE A BLOODSHED THAT WE'VE NEVER EXPERIENCED.
I SAID THAT SEVEN MONTHS BEFORE THE MASSACRE OF OCTOBER 7th.
AND EVER SINCE, I SENT -- I GUESS ANOTHER TEN LETTERS OF THE SAME KIND, UP TO NOW, I HAVEN'T GOTTEN ONE REPLY FROM THE MINISTER.
ONE REPLY.
>> DO YOU THINK THE ISRAELI PUBLIC SEES WHAT YOU SEE IN GAZA AND THE WEST BANK?
>> NO.
THEY DON'T.
THE MEDIA IN ISRAEL -- THE MEDIA IN ISRAEL RUN ENTIRELY, BY THE WAY, IT'S NOT, YOU KNOW -- IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN DOING OR FORCING THE MEDIA TO DO.
THE MEDIA, APART FROM -- TOTALLY HIDES OR IGNORES FROM THE ONGOING IN GAZA AND IN THE WEST BANK.
NOBODY ACTUALLY KNOWS ABOUT IT.
AND THE VAST MAJORITY DON'T WANT TO KNOW ABOUT IT.
IT'S BECAUSE IT'S VERY HARD TO SEE A VILLAIN WHEN YOU LOOK IN THE MIRROR.
>> THE POLLS IN ISRAEL SHOW HIGH SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL'S WAR IN GAZA, IN JANUARY, THERE WAS A GROUP, THE ISRAEL DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE, WHICH I THINK IS A RESPECTED RESEARCH INSTITUTE SAID 56% OF ISRAELIS POLLED IN JANUARY SAID CONTINUING THE MILITARY OFFENSIVE WAS THE BEST WAY TO RECOVER THE HOSTAGES.
YET, THE PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU IS NOT POPULAR, THAT SAME POLL FOUND THAT ONLY 15% WANT NETANYAHU TO BE PRIME MINISTER ONCE THE WAR IS OVER.
HOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT?
>> WELL, MANY PEOPLE IN ISRAEL PUT THE BLAME, OR, AT LEAST SOME OF THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MASSACRE OF OCTOBER 7th ON NETANYAHU, AND JUSTLY SO.
HE IS RESPONSIBLE.
HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS ONGOING POLICY.
HE SAID, EXPLICITLY, IN 2019, AND I QUOTE HIM ALMOST WORD BY WORD, HE SAID, THOSE WHO OPPOSE A PALESTINIAN STATE, LIKE HE DOES, MUST STRENGTHEN HAMAS.
HE SAID SO.
HE SAID SO.
IN 2015, SAID, AND I QUOTE, THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY IS A BURDEN, HAMAS IS AN ASSET.
HE SAID SO.
THEY WANTED HAMAS TO BE STRONG, AS PART OF THE CLASSIC DIVIDE AND RULE.
AND THEY WANT HAMAS TO BE STRONGER IN ORDER TO FIND AND EXCUSE IN SAYING THAT THERE'S NO ONE TO TALK TO.
THEY WANTED IT.
THEY PASSED NETANYAHU MORE THAN TEN YEARS.
ALLOWED MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO BE TO THE POCKETS OF HAMAS FROM QATAR.
IT'S NOT A SECRET.
EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT.
HE'S RESPONSIBLE.
AND PEOPLE, BECAUSE OF THAT, MANY ISRAELIS DON'T WANT HIM AS A PRIME MINISTER, AND JUSTLY SO.
THEY SAY, YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE, YOU ARE -- YOU ARE GUILTY, SOME EVEN SAY, YOU ARE GUILTY.
AT THE SAME TIME, MANY OF THEM THINK THAT THE WAR MUST GO ON.
OF COURSE I'M NOT THERE, I HAVE MY OWN CRITICISM, BUT WE DO NOT AGREE ABOUT THE WAR, THE ASSAULT.
THERE ARE MANY THAT DO AGREE WITH ME, ESPECIALLY AMONG THE FAMILIES OF THE HOSTAGES, NOT ALL OF THEM.
MANY OF THE FAMILIES OF THE HOSTAGES AND THE VICTIMS WHO WERE BUTCHERED BY HAMAS UNDERSTAND THAT THIS ASSAULT ON GAZA WILL NOT DELIVER NEITHER SECURITY FOR THE ISRAELIS, NOT LET ALONE RELEASE OF THE HOSTAGES.
MORE AND MORE PEOPLE BEGIN TO UNDERSTAND THAT, AND I BELIEVE THAT THE ATMOSPHERE IS SHIFTING, SLOWLY, GRADUALLY, BUT IT IS SHIFTING, BECAUSE OF THAT -- BECAUSE OF THIS SITUATION.
>> SO, LET US TURN NOW TO THE U.S. ROLE HERE.
FIRST, THERE WAS THE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER, SENATOR FROM NEW YORK, THE, I WOULD SAY, THE SORT OF HIGHEST RANKING, MOST PROMINENT JEWISH ELECTED OFFICIAL IN THE UNITED STATES, SAID THAT THE NETANYAHU GOVERNMENT SHOULD GO, THAT THE PRIME MINISTER IS NOT SERVING THE INTERESTS OF THE PEOPLE.
THIS CAUSED A HUGE REACTION.
AND THEN, ACCORDING TO THE WHITE HOUSE, PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN CALLED PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU JUST THIS WEEK TO WARN AGAINST THIS PLANNED MILITARY OPERATION THAT WE ARE TOLD IS COMING IN RAFAH.
SAYING THAT A MAJOR GROUND OPERATION THERE WOULD BE A MISTAKE.
WHAT -- WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS?
PARTICULARLY THE WHITE HOUSE.
DO YOU THINK THAT THIS IS CONSEQUENCE SNSHL.
>> LOOK, I MUST SAY, I'M VERY CRITICAL OF THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, BECAUSE ACTUALLY, WE FOUND THEIR CONSENT, THE ASSAULT ON GAZA, AND THE DEATH TOLL WOULD HAVE NEVER OCCURRED.
I MEAN, THERE IS A KIND OF, YOU KNOW, IF YOU ALLOW ME TO USE SOME CONCEPTS FROM PSYCHOLOGY, THERE IS A KIND OF DISSONANCE COGNITIVE, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, DISSONANCE COGNITIVE IS WHEN ONE CONSCIOUSLY CLINGING TO TWO CONTRADICTORY OR MORE MOMENTS.
AND THAT'S WHAT I SEE IN THE BEHAVIOR OF PRESIDENT BIDEN, BECAUSE ON THE ONE HAND, HE SPEAKS ABOUT THE DIRE SITUATION, THE GRAVE SITUATION OF THE PALESTINIANS IN GAZA.
THEY ARE STARVING THERE.
SO IT IS THE STARVATION, CAUSED BY ISRAEL, AND, OF COURSE, NO MEDICINE, NO HOSPITAL, DESTRUCTION, DEATH TOLL, ET CETERA, ET CETERA.
THAT COULD NOT HAPPEN WITHOUT THE SUPPORT OF THE UNITED STATES.
>> WHY DO YOU SAY THAT?
>> BECAUSE -- BECAUSE I GIVE YOU TWO EXAMPLES, WHICH, FOR ME, ARE THE MAIN ONES.
FIRST OF ALL, EVERY TIME THERE'S A -- A MOTION IN CRITICISM OF ISRAEL IN THE SECURITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED NATIONS, THE UNITED STATES VETOES.
THAT'S SUPPORT, WHICH I DO NOT REALLY ACCEPT.
I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR.
IT'S NOT A SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL AND THE ISRAELIS.
IT'S SUPPORT FOR THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT, WHICH IS AGAINST ISRAELIS.
I AM AS IN OPPOSITION, I'M COMMITTED TO THE ISRAELI PUBLIC, AND I'M TRYING TO DO MY JOB.
AND PART OF MY JOB IS TO STAND STILL AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT IF THE GOVERNMENT IS WRONG, LET ALONE SINCE.
AND THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IN SUPPORTING THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL IS ACTING AGAINST JUSTICE, AGAINST THE PALESTINIANS, BUT ALSO AGAINST THE ISRAELIS.
>> EXCEPT THAT PUBLIC OPINION, AS WE'VEDISCUSSED, DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS GOVERNMENT, BUT IT SUPPORTS WHAT THE GOVERNMENT IS DOING.
YOUR VIEWS ARE NOT IN THE MAJORITY.
>> FIRST OF ALL, YOU MAY BE RIGHT.
THAT DOESN'T UNDERMINE MY OBLIGATION TO RAISE MY VOICE AND TO REPRESENT THE THOUSANDS AND HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF ISRAELIS WHO DO SUPPORT MY VIEW.
AND THE PEOPLE OUT OF ISRAEL.
I GUESS WE BOTH WOULD AGREE THAT POLLS ARE MAINLY FOR STATISTICS, BUT NOT FOR POLITICAL DECISIONS.
>> SO, THE WHITE HOUSE HAS SAID THAT MR. BIDEN ASKED PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU TO SEND A DELEGATION OF INTELLIGENCE AND MILITARY OFFICIALS TO WASHINGTON TO HEAR FIRST-HAND THE WHITE HOUSE'S VIEWS, PARTICULARLY ABOUT THIS PLANNED INCURSION INTO RAFAH.
WE ARE TOLD THAT THE GOVERNMENT, THE NETANYAHU GOVERNMENT HAS AGREED TO SEND SUCH A DELEGATION.
DOES THAT OFFER ANY HOPE TO YOU?
>> I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HEARD NETANYAHU EXPLAIN SENDING THE DELEGATION.
HE SAID HE'S BEEN DOING THAT FOR, AND I QUOTE, FOR RESPECT.
BECAUSE HE RESPECTS BIDEN.
MR. BIDEN.
NOT BECAUSE HE WANTS TO ACHIEVE SOMETHING OR HE'S READY TO, YOU KNOW, TO REFRAIN FROM OPERATING IN RAFAH.
I THINK TO SAY THAT INVADING RAFAH IS WRONG, IT'S AN UNDERSTATEMENT.
IT'S GOING TO BE A CARNAGE.
IT'S -- THE DEATH TOLL THAT'S GOING TO BE THERE, THE BLOODSHED THAT'S GOING TO BE THERE, IS GOING TO BE EVEN MORE DISASTROUS THAN IT'S BEEN -- THAN WHAT HAS BEEN GOING THUS FAR.
>> BEFORE WE LET YOU GO, CLEARLY YOU REMAIN AS OUTSPOKEN AS EVER.
DO YOU FEEL THAT YOU ARE OPENING UP MORE DEMOCRATIC SPACE, YOU KNOW, MORE SPACE FOR PUBLIC CRITICISM, OR TO SORT OF MAINTAIN THESE DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS OF SORT OF PUBLIC DISSENT?
>> YOU KNOW, YOU PROBABLY KNOW THIS STORY, THAT JUST AFTER THE AMERICA, UNITED STATES INVADED VIETNAM, THERE WAS ONE PERSON USED TO DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF THE WHITE HOUSE, AND EVERY TIME HE WAS ASKED, WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE ALONE, YOU KNOW YOU ARE ALL ALONE, EVERYBODY SUPPORTS THE INVASION, THE ASSAULT OF VIETNAM, AND HE USED TO ANSWER, ACCORDING TO THE STORY, HE WAS TOLD THAT HE WAS NOT GOING TO CHANGE SOCIETY, SO, HE USED TO SAY, PERHAPS I'M NOT GOING TO CHANGE SOCIETY, BUT I'M STANDING HERE IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT SOCIETY DOESN'T CHANGE ME.
BUT EVENTUALLY, GOING BACK TO THIS STORY, WE KNOW THAT THIS GUY PROBABLY DID CHANGE SOCIETY.
BECAUSE WE KNOW WHAT HAPPENED LATER.
SO, ANSWERING YOUR QUESTION, BY USING THIS STORY, I DO BELIEVE NOT ONLY ME, BUT THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE, WE WENT TO DEMONSTRATE IN FRONT OF THE AMERICAN EMBASSY, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE OF DAYS AGO.
AND CALLING FOR THE UNITED STATES TO RECOGNIZE THE PALESTINIAN STATE.
SO, IT'S NOT ONLY ME.
IT'S -- IT'S NOT ME.
BUT PEOPLE LIKE ME AND ME TOGETHER, WE ARE THE HOPE FOR BOTH PEOPLES OF THIS LAND, INCLUDING THE ISRAELIS.
>> OFER CASSIF, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SPEAKING WITH US.
>> MY PLEASURE.
THANK YOU.
HAVE A NICE DAY.
>> AND THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT IS CONSISTENTLY DENIED ANY ATTEMPT TO STRENGTHEN HAMAS.
"A Failure of Humanity:" IRC CEO on Impending Famine in Gaza
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 3/20/2024 | 5m 58s | David Miliband joins the show. (5m 58s)
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorship
- News and Public Affairs

Top journalists deliver compelling original analysis of the hour's headlines.

- News and Public Affairs

FRONTLINE is investigative journalism that questions, explains and changes our world.












Support for PBS provided by:
