North Korea Blusters, Jobs & the Economy, and Political Wrap
Special | 24m 48sVideo has Closed Captions
North Korea continues to be problematic and focus on the economy, immigration and politics
North Korea continues its hostile rhetoric and saber-rattling prompting concerns over their nuclear capabilities. Also, do today’s job numbers signify a cooling economy? Plus, momentum for new immigration legislation and this week’s political wrap-up. Joining Gwen: David Sanger, New York Times; David Wessel, Wall Street Journal; Fawn Johnson, National Journal; Amy Walter, Cook Political Report.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Major funding for “Washington Week with The Atlantic” is provided by Consumer Cellular, Otsuka, Kaiser Permanente, the Yuen Foundation, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
North Korea Blusters, Jobs & the Economy, and Political Wrap
Special | 24m 48sVideo has Closed Captions
North Korea continues its hostile rhetoric and saber-rattling prompting concerns over their nuclear capabilities. Also, do today’s job numbers signify a cooling economy? Plus, momentum for new immigration legislation and this week’s political wrap-up. Joining Gwen: David Sanger, New York Times; David Wessel, Wall Street Journal; Fawn Johnson, National Journal; Amy Walter, Cook Political Report.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
How to Watch Washington Week with The Atlantic
Washington Week with The Atlantic is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.
Buy Now
10 big stories Washington Week covered
Washington Week came on the air February 23, 1967. In the 50 years that followed, we covered a lot of history-making events. Read up on 10 of the biggest stories Washington Week covered in its first 50 years.Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorshipGWEN: THAT SOUND YOU HEAR, HISSING SOUND ON JOBS, IMMIGRATION, POLITICS AND HISSING SOUND ON JOBS, IMMIGRATION, POLITICS AND FOREIGN POLICY.
IMMIGRATION, POLITICS AND FOREIGN POLICY.
WE EXPLAIN IT ALL TONIGHT ON FOREIGN POLICY.
WE EXPLAIN IT ALL TONIGHT ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
WE EXPLAIN IT ALL TONIGHT ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
A ROCKY NEW JOBS REPORT.
"WASHINGTON WEEK."
A ROCKY NEW JOBS REPORT.
WHY HAVE SO MANY AMERICANS A ROCKY NEW JOBS REPORT.
WHY HAVE SO MANY AMERICANS STOPPED LOOKING FOR WORK?
WHY HAVE SO MANY AMERICANS STOPPED LOOKING FOR WORK?
ESCALATING TENSIONS ON THE STOPPED LOOKING FOR WORK?
ESCALATING TENSIONS ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA.
ESCALATING TENSIONS ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA.
>> IT ONLY TAKES BEING WRONG KOREAN PENINSULA.
>> IT ONLY TAKES BEING WRONG ONCE AND I DON'T WANT TO BE THE >> IT ONLY TAKES BEING WRONG ONCE AND I DON'T WANT TO BE THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WHO WAS ONCE AND I DON'T WANT TO BE THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WHO WAS WRONG ONCE.
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WHO WAS WRONG ONCE.
SO WE WILL CONTINUE TO TAKE WRONG ONCE.
SO WE WILL CONTINUE TO TAKE THESE THREATS SERIOUSLY.
SO WE WILL CONTINUE TO TAKE THESE THREATS SERIOUSLY.
GWEN: WILL THREATS LEAD TO THESE THREATS SERIOUSLY.
GWEN: WILL THREATS LEAD TO MITARYLI ACTION?
GWEN: WILL THREATS LEAD TO MITARYLI ACTION?
CLOSING IN ON COMPROMISE ON MITARYLI ACTION?
CLOSING IN ON COMPROMISE ON IMMIGRATION REFORM.
CLOSING IN ON COMPROMISE ON IMMIGRATION REFORM.
>> I AM VERY, VERY OPTIMISTIC IMMIGRATION REFORM.
>> I AM VERY, VERY OPTIMISTIC THAT WE WILL HAVE AN AGREEMENT >> I AM VERY, VERY OPTIMISTIC THAT WE WILL HAVE AN AGREEMENT AMONG THE EIGHT OF US NEXT WEEK.
THAT WE WILL HAVE AN AGREEMENT AMONG THE EIGHT OF US NEXT WEEK.
GWEN: IS CGRESONS READY TO ACT?
AMONG THE EIGHT OF US NEXT WEEK.
GWEN: IS CGRESONS READY TO ACT?
AND HILLARY CLINTON EMERGES.
GWEN: IS CGRESONS READY TO ACT?
AND HILLARY CLINTON EMERGES.
>> WHEN WOMEN PARTICIPATE THIS AND HILLARY CLINTON EMERGES.
>> WHEN WOMEN PARTICIPATE THIS THE POLITICS OF THEIR NATION, >> WHEN WOMEN PARTICIPATE THIS THE POLITICS OF THEIR NATION, THEY CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
THE POLITICS OF THEIR NATION, THEY CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
GWEN: SENDING POLITICAL OZ THEY CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
GWEN: SENDING POLITICAL OZ MAKERS INTO OVERDRIVE.
GWEN: SENDING POLITICAL OZ MAKERS INTO OVERDRIVE.
COVERING THE WEEK DAVID WESSEL MAKERS INTO OVERDRIVE.
COVERING THE WEEK DAVID WESSEL OF "THE WALL STREET JOURNAL."
COVERING THE WEEK DAVID WESSEL OF "THE WALL STREET JOURNAL."
DAVID SANGER OF THE NEW YORK OF "THE WALL STREET JOURNAL."
DAVID SANGER OF THE NEW YORK TIMES.
DAVID SANGER OF THE NEW YORK TIMES.
FAWN JOHNSON OF "NATIONAL TIMES.
FAWN JOHNSON OF "NATIONAL JOURNAL."
FAWN JOHNSON OF "NATIONAL JOURNAL."
AND AMY WALTER OF "THE COOK JOURNAL."
AND AMY WALTER OF "THE COOK POLITICAL."
AND AMY WALTER OF "THE COOK POLITICAL."
>> AWARD-WINNING COVERAGE AND POLITICAL."
>> AWARD-WINNING COVERAGE AND ANALYSIS, COVERING HISTORY AS IT >> AWARD-WINNING COVERAGE AND ANALYSIS, COVERING HISTORY AS IT HAPPENS.
ANALYSIS, COVERING HISTORY AS IT HAPPENS.
LIVE FROM OUR NATION'S CAPITOL, HAPPENS.
LIVE FROM OUR NATION'S CAPITOL, THIS IS "WASHINGTON WEEK" WITH LIVE FROM OUR NATION'S CAPITOL, THIS IS "WASHINGTON WEEK" WITH GWEN IFILL.
ONCE AGAIN LIVE FROM WASHINGTON, MODERATOR GWEN IFILL.
GWEN: GOOD EVENING.
MODERATOR GWEN IFILL.
GWEN: GOOD EVENING.
JUST WHEN IT SEEMED THE ECONOMY GWEN: GOOD EVENING.
JUST WHEN IT SEEMED THE ECONOMY WAS ON A RELIABLE UPTURN AND JUST WHEN IT SEEMED THE ECONOMY WAS ON A RELIABLE UPTURN AND JOBS WERE RETURNING FOR GOOD WAS ON A RELIABLE UPTURN AND JOBS WERE RETURNING FOR GOOD COMES UNSETTLING NEWS TODAY.
JOBS WERE RETURNING FOR GOOD COMES UNSETTLING NEWS TODAY.
INSTEAD OF THE 200,000 NEW JOBS COMES UNSETTLING NEWS TODAY.
INSTEAD OF THE 200,000 NEW JOBS ECONOMISTS PREDICTED FOR THE INSTEAD OF THE 200,000 NEW JOBS ECONOMISTS PREDICTED FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH ONLY 88,000 WERE ECONOMISTS PREDICTED FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH ONLY 88,000 WERE ADD.
MONTH OF MARCH ONLY 88,000 WERE ADD.
AND EVEN THOUGH THE UNEMPLOYMENT ADD.
AND EVEN THOUGH THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE DROPPED TO 7.6% THAT IS AND EVEN THOUGH THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE DROPPED TO 7.6% THAT IS BECAUSE SOME PEOPLE HAVE GIVEN RATE DROPPED TO 7.6% THAT IS BECAUSE SOME PEOPLE HAVE GIVEN UP LOOK FOR WORK.
BECAUSE SOME PEOPLE HAVE GIVEN UP LOOK FOR WORK.
SO WHY ARE THINGS SO UNSTABLE IN UP LOOK FOR WORK.
SO WHY ARE THINGS SO UNSTABLE IN THE ECONOMY?
SO WHY ARE THINGS SO UNSTABLE IN THE ECONOMY?
DAVID?
THE ECONOMY?
DAVID?
>> IT WAS AN UNAMBIGUOUS JOBS DAVID?
>> IT WAS AN UNAMBIGUOUS JOBS REPORT AT LEAST UNTIL THE >> IT WAS AN UNAMBIGUOUS JOBS REPORT AT LEAST UNTIL THE GOVERNMENT REVISES IT.
REPORT AT LEAST UNTIL THE GOVERNMENT REVISES IT.
NEW JOBS WERE CREATED AT HALF GOVERNMENT REVISES IT.
NEW JOBS WERE CREATED AT HALF THE PACE.
NEW JOBS WERE CREATED AT HALF THE PACE.
AND THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FELL THE PACE.
AND THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FELL ONLY BECAUSE HALF A MILLION AND THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FELL ONLY BECAUSE HALF A MILLION PEOPLE LEFT THE LABOR FORCE.
ONLY BECAUSE HALF A MILLION PEOPLE LEFT THE LABOR FORCE.
AND THE REASON IT WAS SO PEOPLE LEFT THE LABOR FORCE.
AND THE REASON IT WAS SO DISTURBING WAS THAT IT COMES AT AND THE REASON IT WAS SO DISTURBING WAS THAT IT COMES AT A TIME WHEN THE OTHER ECONOMIC DISTURBING WAS THAT IT COMES AT A TIME WHEN THE OTHER ECONOMIC DATA WAS LOOKING PRETTY GOOD.
A TIME WHEN THE OTHER ECONOMIC DATA WAS LOOKING PRETTY GOOD.
AUTO SALES IS GOING UP, HOUSING.
DATA WAS LOOKING PRETTY GOOD.
AUTO SALES IS GOING UP, HOUSING.
THE STOCK MARKET HAD A BAD WEEK AUTO SALES IS GOING UP, HOUSING.
THE STOCK MARKET HAD A BAD WEEK THIS WEEK BUT IT'S GROWN 10% THE STOCK MARKET HAD A BAD WEEK THIS WEEK BUT IT'S GROWN 10% THIS YEAR.
THIS WEEK BUT IT'S GROWN 10% THIS YEAR.
I GUESS THE QUESTION IS -- WHAT THIS YEAR.
I GUESS THE QUESTION IS -- WHAT HAPPENED?
I GUESS THE QUESTION IS -- WHAT HAPPENED?
WHAT WENT WRONG?
HAPPENED?
WHAT WENT WRONG?
ONE IS THERE IS THE REVISION WHAT WENT WRONG?
ONE IS THERE IS THE REVISION QUESTION.
ONE IS THERE IS THE REVISION QUESTION.
IN 10 OF THE LAST 14 MONTHS THE QUESTION.
IN 10 OF THE LAST 14 MONTHS THE GOVERNMENT HAS REVISED UP ITS IN 10 OF THE LAST 14 MONTHS THE GOVERNMENT HAS REVISED UP ITS GOVERNMENT HAS REVISED UP ITS INITIAL ESTIMATE.
INITIAL ESTIMATE.
GWEN: SO IT LOOKS BETTER THAN IT SEEMED.
GWEN: SO IT LOOKS BETTER THAN IT SEEMED.
>> IT MAY BE THAT THE NUMBERS SEEMED.
>> IT MAY BE THAT THE NUMBERS WERE STRONG IN JANUARY, >> IT MAY BE THAT THE NUMBERS WERE STRONG IN JANUARY, FEBRUARY, A LITTLE OFFSETTING IN WERE STRONG IN JANUARY, FEBRUARY, A LITTLE OFFSETTING IN MARCH.
FEBRUARY, A LITTLE OFFSETTING IN MARCH.
WASHINGTON IS REALLY A MINUS.
MARCH.
WASHINGTON IS REALLY A MINUS.
IT'S HARD TO SEE THAT THE WASHINGTON IS REALLY A MINUS.
IT'S HARD TO SEE THAT THE SEQUESTER THE ACROSS THE BOARD IT'S HARD TO SEE THAT THE SEQUESTER THE ACROSS THE BOARD SPENDING CUTS HAD ANY EFFECT SEQUESTER THE ACROSS THE BOARD SPENDING CUTS HAD ANY EFFECT YET.
SPENDING CUTS HAD ANY EFFECT YET.
IT LOOKS LIKE THE TAX INCREASE YET.
IT LOOKS LIKE THE TAX INCREASE IS BEGINNING TO WORK ITS WAY IT LOOKS LIKE THE TAX INCREASE IS BEGINNING TO WORK ITS WAY THROUGH.
IS BEGINNING TO WORK ITS WAY THROUGH.
RETAIL EMPLOYMENT WAS DOWN SOME.
THROUGH.
RETAIL EMPLOYMENT WAS DOWN SOME.
THE SECOND THING THAT MIGHT BE RETAIL EMPLOYMENT WAS DOWN SOME.
THE SECOND THING THAT MIGHT BE GOING ON IS THAT -- OR THE THE SECOND THING THAT MIGHT BE GOING ON IS THAT -- OR THE THIRD, RATHER, IS THAT EMPLOYERS GOING ON IS THAT -- OR THE THIRD, RATHER, IS THAT EMPLOYERS ARE JUST A LITTLE UNEASY AND THIRD, RATHER, IS THAT EMPLOYERS ARE JUST A LITTLE UNEASY AND BACK O TO THAT THING ABOUT THE ARE JUST A LITTLE UNEASY AND BACK O TO THAT THING ABOUT THE WAIT AND SEE THING AND WHEN ALL BACK O TO THAT THING ABOUT THE WAIT AND SEE THING AND WHEN ALL THE EMPLOYERS WAIT AND SEE, YOU WAIT AND SEE THING AND WHEN ALL THE EMPLOYERS WAIT AND SEE, YOU GET THIS BAD NUMBER.
THE EMPLOYERS WAIT AND SEE, YOU GET THIS BAD NUMBER.
I HATE TO BE SO NEGATIVE ON THE GET THIS BAD NUMBER.
I HATE TO BE SO NEGATIVE ON THE SHOW.
I HATE TO BE SO NEGATIVE ON THE SHOW.
BUT THE SILVER LINING IS WE'RE SHOW.
BUT THE SILVER LINING IS WE'RE NOT IN EUROPE.
BUT THE SILVER LINING IS WE'RE NOT IN EUROPE.
GWEN: THAT'S YOUR SILVER LINING?
NOT IN EUROPE.
GWEN: THAT'S YOUR SILVER LINING?
WOW.
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OVER GWEN: THAT'S YOUR SILVER LINING?
WOW.
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OVER THERE IS 12%.
WOW.
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OVER THERE IS 12%.
THE NUMBER OF COUNTRIES IN THERE IS 12%.
THE NUMBER OF COUNTRIES IN EUROPE SAID THIS WEEK THAT IN THE NUMBER OF COUNTRIES IN EUROPE SAID THIS WEEK THAT IN SPAIN THE RATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT EUROPE SAID THIS WEEK THAT IN SPAIN THE RATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG PEOPLE UNDER 25 WHO ARE SPAIN THE RATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG PEOPLE UNDER 25 WHO ARE LOOKING FOR WORK IS 56%.
AMONG PEOPLE UNDER 25 WHO ARE LOOKING FOR WORK IS 56%.
GWEN: WOW.
LOOKING FOR WORK IS 56%.
GWEN: WOW.
>> YOU MENTIONED THAT SEQUESTER GWEN: WOW.
>> YOU MENTIONED THAT SEQUESTER WAS NOT A BIG FACTOR YET.
>> YOU MENTIONED THAT SEQUESTER WAS NOT A BIG FACTOR YET.
BUT THERE DOESN'T SEEM TO BE ANY WAS NOT A BIG FACTOR YET.
BUT THERE DOESN'T SEEM TO BE ANY URGENCY RIGHT NOW TO SOLVE THE BUT THERE DOESN'T SEEM TO BE ANY URGENCY RIGHT NOW TO SOLVE THE SEQUESTER PROBLEM AND THE WHITE URGENCY RIGHT NOW TO SOLVE THE SEQUESTER PROBLEM AND THE WHITE HOUSE HAS MADE THE CASE THAT SEQUESTER PROBLEM AND THE WHITE HOUSE HAS MADE THE CASE THAT THIS WILL HAVE A CORROSIVE HOUSE HAS MADE THE CASE THAT THIS WILL HAVE A CORROSIVE EFFECT MONTH TO MONTH.
THIS WILL HAVE A CORROSIVE EFFECT MONTH TO MONTH.
ANYTHING IN THESE NUMBERS TO EFFECT MONTH TO MONTH.
ANYTHING IN THESE NUMBERS TO SUGGEST THAT WE'RE BEGINNING TO ANYTHING IN THESE NUMBERS TO SUGGEST THAT WE'RE BEGINNING TO SEE THAT OR THAT COULD GET THE SUGGEST THAT WE'RE BEGINNING TO SEE THAT OR THAT COULD GET THE WAY OF REVERSING THIS?
SEE THAT OR THAT COULD GET THE WAY OF REVERSING THIS?
>> WELL, IT'S DEFINITELY THE WAY OF REVERSING THIS?
>> WELL, IT'S DEFINITELY THE CASE THAT IT WILL GET -- IT WILL >> WELL, IT'S DEFINITELY THE CASE THAT IT WILL GET -- IT WILL MAKE EFFECT GOING FORWARD.
CASE THAT IT WILL GET -- IT WILL MAKE EFFECT GOING FORWARD.
IT'S HARD TO FIND IT IN THESE MAKE EFFECT GOING FORWARD.
IT'S HARD TO FIND IT IN THESE NUMBERS.
IT'S HARD TO FIND IT IN THESE NUMBERS.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT WAS DOWN NUMBERS.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT WAS DOWN ABOUT 2,000.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT WAS DOWN ABOUT 2,000.
THAT'S LOST IN THE NOISE.
ABOUT 2,000.
THAT'S LOST IN THE NOISE.
IF IT'S HAVING AN EFFECT, IT MAY THAT'S LOST IN THE NOISE.
IF IT'S HAVING AN EFFECT, IT MAY BE IN SOME CONTRACTOR WHO ARE IF IT'S HAVING AN EFFECT, IT MAY BE IN SOME CONTRACTOR WHO ARE NOT HIRING TEMPS.
BE IN SOME CONTRACTOR WHO ARE NOT HIRING TEMPS.
IT'S HARD TO SEE.
NOT HIRING TEMPS.
IT'S HARD TO SEE.
THE WHITE HOUSE MADE A IT'S HARD TO SEE.
THE WHITE HOUSE MADE A MISCALCULATION.
THE WHITE HOUSE MADE A MISCALCULATION.
THEY SAID THE WORLD IS GOING TO MISCALCULATION.
THEY SAID THE WORLD IS GOING TO COLLAPSE.
THEY SAID THE WORLD IS GOING TO COLLAPSE.
WE DID.
COLLAPSE.
WE DID.
WE'RE STUCK WITH IT.
WE DID.
WE'RE STUCK WITH IT.
BUT IT WILL DEFINITELY HAVE AN WE'RE STUCK WITH IT.
BUT IT WILL DEFINITELY HAVE AN EFFECT AS WE GO FORWARD AND BUT IT WILL DEFINITELY HAVE AN EFFECT AS WE GO FORWARD AND WE'LL SEE SOME FURLOWS AND LAFES EFFECT AS WE GO FORWARD AND WE'LL SEE SOME FURLOWS AND LAFES IN THE MONTHS AHEAD.
WE'LL SEE SOME FURLOWS AND LAFES IN THE MONTHS AHEAD.
>> ONE THING WE DON'T HEAR A LOT IN THE MONTHS AHEAD.
>> ONE THING WE DON'T HEAR A LOT ABOUT ARE WAGES, THE IMPACT >> ONE THING WE DON'T HEAR A LOT ABOUT ARE WAGES, THE IMPACT THERE.
ABOUT ARE WAGES, THE IMPACT THERE.
ARE CONSUMERS ACTUALLY TO HELP THERE.
ARE CONSUMERS ACTUALLY TO HELP DIG US OUT OF THIS?
ARE CONSUMERS ACTUALLY TO HELP DIG US OUT OF THIS?
>> THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
DIG US OUT OF THIS?
>> THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
BASICALLY WHEN YOU HAVE THIS >> THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
BASICALLY WHEN YOU HAVE THIS MANY UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE, BASICALLY WHEN YOU HAVE THIS MANY UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE, EMPLOYERS DON'T HAVE TO GIVE MANY UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE, EMPLOYERS DON'T HAVE TO GIVE RAISES BECAUSE THERE'S ALWAYS EMPLOYERS DON'T HAVE TO GIVE RAISES BECAUSE THERE'S ALWAYS SOMEONE WILLING TO DO THE JOB.
RAISES BECAUSE THERE'S ALWAYS SOMEONE WILLING TO DO THE JOB.
RAISES HAVE BEEN FLAT.
SOMEONE WILLING TO DO THE JOB.
RAISES HAVE BEEN FLAT.
SOME MONTHS ARE ABOVE INFLATION.
RAISES HAVE BEEN FLAT.
SOME MONTHS ARE ABOVE INFLATION.
SOME MONTHS A HAIR BELOW.
SOME MONTHS ARE ABOVE INFLATION.
SOME MONTHS A HAIR BELOW.
BUT THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO SOME MONTHS A HAIR BELOW.
BUT THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO IMPROVEMENT ON WAGES AND THAT BUT THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO IMPROVEMENT ON WAGES AND THAT MAKES IT HARD FOR PEOPLE TO IMPROVEMENT ON WAGES AND THAT MAKES IT HARD FOR PEOPLE TO SPEND.
MAKES IT HARD FOR PEOPLE TO SPEND.
>> WILL THIS EFFECT THE FEDERAL SPEND.
>> WILL THIS EFFECT THE FEDERAL POLICY OR WHAT THE -- >> WILL THIS EFFECT THE FEDERAL POLICY OR WHAT THE -- >> WHAT THE FED HAS SAID IS POLICY OR WHAT THE -- >> WHAT THE FED HAS SAID IS THEY'RE GOING TO BUY A LOT OF >> WHAT THE FED HAS SAID IS THEY'RE GOING TO BUY A LOT OF BONDS, $85 MILLION IN BONDS THEY'RE GOING TO BUY A LOT OF BONDS, $85 MILLION IN BONDS UNTIL THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE WILL BONDS, $85 MILLION IN BONDS UNTIL THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE WILL COME DOWN TO 6%.
UNTIL THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE WILL COME DOWN TO 6%.
THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF COME DOWN TO 6%.
THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF WHISPERING FROM THE FED THAT THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF WHISPERING FROM THE FED THAT MAYBE THEY WILL BEGIN TO REDUCE WHISPERING FROM THE FED THAT MAYBE THEY WILL BEGIN TO REDUCE THEIR PURCHASESERS TAKE THEIR MAYBE THEY WILL BEGIN TO REDUCE THEIR PURCHASESERS TAKE THEIR FOOT OFF THE GAS PEDDLE.
THEIR PURCHASESERS TAKE THEIR FOOT OFF THE GAS PEDDLE.
AS FOR CONGRESS AND THE FOOT OFF THE GAS PEDDLE.
AS FOR CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT, THERE'S 100 AS FOR CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT, THERE'S 100 ECONOMISTS WHO HAVE 150 IDEAS OF PRESIDENT, THERE'S 100 ECONOMISTS WHO HAVE 150 IDEAS OF WHAT THEY SHOULD DO.
ECONOMISTS WHO HAVE 150 IDEAS OF WHAT THEY SHOULD DO.
NONE OF THEM WILL BE ACCEPTED.
WHAT THEY SHOULD DO.
NONE OF THEM WILL BE ACCEPTED.
GWEN: THESE JOBS THAT PEOPLE NONE OF THEM WILL BE ACCEPTED.
GWEN: THESE JOBS THAT PEOPLE HAVE STOPPED LOOKED FOR, ARE GWEN: THESE JOBS THAT PEOPLE HAVE STOPPED LOOKED FOR, ARE THEY GONE FOREVER?
HAVE STOPPED LOOKED FOR, ARE THEY GONE FOREVER?
DO WE JUST HAVE TO GET USED TO THEY GONE FOREVER?
DO WE JUST HAVE TO GET USED TO AN ECONOMY THAT HAS -- DOESN'T DO WE JUST HAVE TO GET USED TO AN ECONOMY THAT HAS -- DOESN'T HAVE THE KIND OF JOBS THAT IT AN ECONOMY THAT HAS -- DOESN'T HAVE THE KIND OF JOBS THAT IT USED TO HAVE AND THAT THE MARKET HAVE THE KIND OF JOBS THAT IT USED TO HAVE AND THAT THE MARKET WON'T SUSTAIN IT?
USED TO HAVE AND THAT THE MARKET WON'T SUSTAIN IT?
>> I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO WON'T SUSTAIN IT?
>> I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A PERMANENT UNDERCLASS OF >> I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A PERMANENT UNDERCLASS OF UNEMPLOYMENT.
HAVE A PERMANENT UNDERCLASS OF UNEMPLOYMENT.
I MEAN, WE'VE GONE THROUGH THIS UNEMPLOYMENT.
I MEAN, WE'VE GONE THROUGH THIS BEFORE WHEN WE WENT FROM THE I MEAN, WE'VE GONE THROUGH THIS BEFORE WHEN WE WENT FROM THE FARM TO THE FACTORY.
BEFORE WHEN WE WENT FROM THE FARM TO THE FACTORY.
WHERE ARE ALL THE FORM WORKERS' FARM TO THE FACTORY.
WHERE ARE ALL THE FORM WORKERS' KIDS GOING TO WORK?
WHERE ARE ALL THE FORM WORKERS' KIDS GOING TO WORK?
WE CAME UP WITH JOBS THAT WHO KIDS GOING TO WORK?
WE CAME UP WITH JOBS THAT WHO WOULD HAVE EVER IMAGINED THEN, WE CAME UP WITH JOBS THAT WHO WOULD HAVE EVER IMAGINED THEN, WEB DESIGNER AND MASSAGE WOULD HAVE EVER IMAGINED THEN, WEB DESIGNER AND MASSAGE THERAPIES AND STUFF.
WEB DESIGNER AND MASSAGE THERAPIES AND STUFF.
I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO RUN THERAPIES AND STUFF.
I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO RUN OUT OF JOBS UNTIL WE RUN OUT OF I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO RUN OUT OF JOBS UNTIL WE RUN OUT OF IMAGINATION.
OUT OF JOBS UNTIL WE RUN OUT OF IMAGINATION.
THE WORRY IS WE'LL CREATE JOBS IMAGINATION.
THE WORRY IS WE'LL CREATE JOBS BUT THEY WON'T BE VERY GOOD.
THE WORRY IS WE'LL CREATE JOBS BUT THEY WON'T BE VERY GOOD.
THERE ARE ALMOST 300,000 COLLEGE BUT THEY WON'T BE VERY GOOD.
THERE ARE ALMOST 300,000 COLLEGE GRADS THAT ARE WORKING MINIMUM THERE ARE ALMOST 300,000 COLLEGE GRADS THAT ARE WORKING MINIMUM WAGE JOBS.
GRADS THAT ARE WORKING MINIMUM WAGE JOBS.
THAT'S DOUBLE THAN BEFORE THE WAGE JOBS.
THAT'S DOUBLE THAN BEFORE THE RECESSION.
THAT'S DOUBLE THAN BEFORE THE RECESSION.
GWEN: THE OTHER OPTION IS THAT RECESSION.
GWEN: THE OTHER OPTION IS THAT WE'RE IN THE SPRING SLUMP AND WE GWEN: THE OTHER OPTION IS THAT WE'RE IN THE SPRING SLUMP AND WE WILL GROW OURSELVES OUT OF?
WE'RE IN THE SPRING SLUMP AND WE WILL GROW OURSELVES OUT OF?
>> YEAH.
WILL GROW OURSELVES OUT OF?
>> YEAH.
IT SEEMS THAT WE HAVE A STRONG >> YEAH.
IT SEEMS THAT WE HAVE A STRONG START TO THE YEAR AND THE SLUMP.
IT SEEMS THAT WE HAVE A STRONG START TO THE YEAR AND THE SLUMP.
SOME OF IT WAS THIS NOISE.
START TO THE YEAR AND THE SLUMP.
SOME OF IT WAS THIS NOISE.
I THINK THE BETTING RIGHT NOW IS SOME OF IT WAS THIS NOISE.
I THINK THE BETTING RIGHT NOW IS THAT THE FIRST QUARTER WAS I THINK THE BETTING RIGHT NOW IS THAT THE FIRST QUARTER WAS PRETTY STRONG AND THE SECOND THAT THE FIRST QUARTER WAS PRETTY STRONG AND THE SECOND QUARTER IS GOING TO BE A LITTLE PRETTY STRONG AND THE SECOND QUARTER IS GOING TO BE A LITTLE WEAKER.
QUARTER IS GOING TO BE A LITTLE WEAKER.
GWEN: OK.
WEAKER.
GWEN: OK.
THANKS, DAVID.
GWEN: OK.
THANKS, DAVID.
NOW TO THE ESCALATING TENSIONS THANKS, DAVID.
NOW TO THE ESCALATING TENSIONS ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA.
NOW TO THE ESCALATING TENSIONS ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA.
A DAY PASSED WHERE THREATS WERE ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA.
A DAY PASSED WHERE THREATS WERE NOT ISSUED EITHER FROM NORTH A DAY PASSED WHERE THREATS WERE NOT ISSUED EITHER FROM NORTH WHICH MOVED ADVANCED MISSILE NOT ISSUED EITHER FROM NORTH WHICH MOVED ADVANCED MISSILE SYSTEMS TO GUAM TO FEND OFF WHICH MOVED ADVANCED MISSILE SYSTEMS TO GUAM TO FEND OFF ATTACKS.
SYSTEMS TO GUAM TO FEND OFF ATTACKS.
JAMES CARNEY HAD THIS TO SAY ATTACKS.
JAMES CARNEY HAD THIS TO SAY TODAY.
JAMES CARNEY HAD THIS TO SAY TODAY.
>> WE HAVE SEEN THEM LAUNCH TODAY.
>> WE HAVE SEEN THEM LAUNCH MISSILES IN THE PAST AND THE >> WE HAVE SEEN THEM LAUNCH MISSILES IN THE PAST AND THE UNITED NATIONS HAS REPEATEDLY MISSILES IN THE PAST AND THE UNITED NATIONS HAS REPEATEDLY CONDEMNED THEM UNDER NUMEROUS UNITED NATIONS HAS REPEATEDLY CONDEMNED THEM UNDER NUMEROUS SECURITY COUNCIL REZZ LOSES AND CONDEMNED THEM UNDER NUMEROUS SECURITY COUNCIL REZZ LOSES AND IT WOULD FIT THEIR CURRENT SECURITY COUNCIL REZZ LOSES AND IT WOULD FIT THEIR CURRENT HELPFULOF BELLICOSE AND IT WOULD FIT THEIR CURRENT HELPFULOF BELLICOSE AND AND UNCONSTRUCTIVE.
HELPFULOF BELLICOSE AND AND UNCONSTRUCTIVE.
GWEN: HE KEEPS USING THOSE AND UNCONSTRUCTIVE.
GWEN: HE KEEPS USING THOSE TERMS.
GWEN: HE KEEPS USING THOSE TERMS.
HAS THERE BEEN A LOT OF BLUSTER?
TERMS.
HAS THERE BEEN A LOT OF BLUSTER?
>> BLUSTER IS ALWAYS A BIG PART HAS THERE BEEN A LOT OF BLUSTER?
>> BLUSTER IS ALWAYS A BIG PART OF IT.
>> BLUSTER IS ALWAYS A BIG PART OF IT.
BUT THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE OF IT.
BUT THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE DIFFERENT.
BUT THERE ARE THINGS THAT ARE DIFFERENT.
IT'S WORTH SEPARATING THE TWO.
DIFFERENT.
IT'S WORTH SEPARATING THE TWO.
ON THE BLUSTER SIDE THE NORTH IT'S WORTH SEPARATING THE TWO.
ON THE BLUSTER SIDE THE NORTH JUNG-UN ON ANG KIM ON THE BLUSTER SIDE THE NORTH JUNG-UN ON ANG KIM BIG MAP.
JUNG-UN ON ANG KIM BIG MAP.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE COLD WAR, BIG MAP.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE COLD WAR, PEOPLE USUALLY DIDN'T AMOUNT IT.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE COLD WAR, PEOPLE USUALLY DIDN'T AMOUNT IT.
WE DON'T THINK THEY HAVE ANY PEOPLE USUALLY DIDN'T AMOUNT IT.
WE DON'T THINK THEY HAVE ANY MISSILES THAT CAN REACH ANY WE DON'T THINK THEY HAVE ANY MISSILES THAT CAN REACH ANY PLACE CLOSE TO THE UNITED MISSILES THAT CAN REACH ANY PLACE CLOSE TO THE UNITED STATES.
PLACE CLOSE TO THE UNITED STATES.
THERE ARE SOME RUMORS THAT IT STATES.
THERE ARE SOME RUMORS THAT IT COULD REACH WITH -- HAWAII.
THERE ARE SOME RUMORS THAT IT COULD REACH WITH -- HAWAII.
ON THE OTHER HAND, THEY HAVE COULD REACH WITH -- HAWAII.
ON THE OTHER HAND, THEY HAVE SHOWN THAT THEIR MISSILES ARE OF ON THE OTHER HAND, THEY HAVE SHOWN THAT THEIR MISSILES ARE OF GROWING RANGE.
SHOWN THAT THEIR MISSILES ARE OF GROWING RANGE.
THEY HAVE NOW CONDUCTED THREE GROWING RANGE.
THEY HAVE NOW CONDUCTED THREE NUCLEAR TESTS.
THEY HAVE NOW CONDUCTED THREE NUCLEAR TESTS.
IT LOOKS LIKE THE MOST RECENT NUCLEAR TESTS.
IT LOOKS LIKE THE MOST RECENT ONE WAS SUCCESSFUL.
IT LOOKS LIKE THE MOST RECENT ONE WAS SUCCESSFUL.
THERE'S NO EVIDENT THAT THEY ONE WAS SUCCESSFUL.
THERE'S NO EVIDENT THAT THEY COULD PUT A NUCLEAR WEAPON ON A THERE'S NO EVIDENT THAT THEY COULD PUT A NUCLEAR WEAPON ON A MISSILE.
COULD PUT A NUCLEAR WEAPON ON A MISSILE.
BUT SOONER OR LATER THEY'LL GET MISSILE.
BUT SOONER OR LATER THEY'LL GET THERE.
BUT SOONER OR LATER THEY'LL GET THERE.
FOR A DECADE AND A HALF, EVERY THERE.
FOR A DECADE AND A HALF, EVERY AMERICAN PRESIDENT HAS KICKED FOR A DECADE AND A HALF, EVERY AMERICAN PRESIDENT HAS KICKED THIS PROBLEM DOWN THE ROAD.
AMERICAN PRESIDENT HAS KICKED THIS PROBLEM DOWN THE ROAD.
WE SPENT TIME DEALING WITH IRAQ.
THIS PROBLEM DOWN THE ROAD.
WE SPENT TIME DEALING WITH IRAQ.
WE SPENT TIME DEALING WITH WE SPENT TIME DEALING WITH IRAQ.
WE SPENT TIME DEALING WITH AFGHANISTAN AND THROUGH IT ALL, WE SPENT TIME DEALING WITH AFGHANISTAN AND THROUGH IT ALL, THE NORTH KOREANS BUILT ON AND AFGHANISTAN AND THROUGH IT ALL, THE NORTH KOREANS BUILT ON AND ON AND ON.
THE NORTH KOREANS BUILT ON AND ON AND ON.
AND NOW YOU'RE AT THE POINT ON AND ON.
AND NOW YOU'RE AT THE POINT WHERE THEY ACTUALLY DO HAVE SOME AND NOW YOU'RE AT THE POINT WHERE THEY ACTUALLY DO HAVE SOME CAPABILITY AND BY SOME ESTIMATES WHERE THEY ACTUALLY DO HAVE SOME CAPABILITY AND BY SOME ESTIMATES THEY WILL BE ABLE TO REACH THE CAPABILITY AND BY SOME ESTIMATES THEY WILL BE ABLE TO REACH THE UNITED STATES IF YEARS.
THEY WILL BE ABLE TO REACH THE UNITED STATES IF YEARS.
GWEN: SO WE SHOULD BE MORE UNITED STATES IF YEARS.
GWEN: SO WE SHOULD BE MORE WORRIED?
GWEN: SO WE SHOULD BE MORE WORRIED?
>> I THINK YOU HAVE TO BE MORE WORRIED?
>> I THINK YOU HAVE TO BE MORE WORRIED BECAUSE THE MYSTERY IN >> I THINK YOU HAVE TO BE MORE WORRIED BECAUSE THE MYSTERY IN ALL OF THIS IS KIM JUNG-UN WORRIED BECAUSE THE MYSTERY IN ALL OF THIS IS KIM JUNG-UN HIMSELF.
ALL OF THIS IS KIM JUNG-UN HIMSELF.
HE CLEARLY HAS TO SOMEHOW HIMSELF.
HE CLEARLY HAS TO SOMEHOW IMPRESS HIS OWN MILITARY HE CLEARLY HAS TO SOMEHOW IMPRESS HIS OWN MILITARY LEADERSHIP.
IMPRESS HIS OWN MILITARY LEADERSHIP.
AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT QUITE LEADERSHIP.
AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT QUITE THAT'S GOING TO TAKE.
AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT QUITE THAT'S GOING TO TAKE.
BUT THEY SEE A 28, 29-YEAR-OLD THAT'S GOING TO TAKE.
BUT THEY SEE A 28, 29-YEAR-OLD WHO IS COMPLETELY UNTESTED.
BUT THEY SEE A 28, 29-YEAR-OLD WHO IS COMPLETELY UNTESTED.
AND HE'S GOT TO SHOW WHAT HE CAN WHO IS COMPLETELY UNTESTED.
AND HE'S GOT TO SHOW WHAT HE CAN DO.
AND HE'S GOT TO SHOW WHAT HE CAN DO.
IN SOUTH KOREA WE HAVE A NEW DO.
IN SOUTH KOREA WE HAVE A NEW PRESIDENT, WHO IS THE DAUGHTER IN SOUTH KOREA WE HAVE A NEW PRESIDENT, WHO IS THE DAUGHTER OF A SOUTH KOREAN STRONG MAN.
PRESIDENT, WHO IS THE DAUGHTER OF A SOUTH KOREAN STRONG MAN.
WE ALSO DON'T KNOW HOW SHE WILL OF A SOUTH KOREAN STRONG MAN.
WE ALSO DON'T KNOW HOW SHE WILL REACT.
WE ALSO DON'T KNOW HOW SHE WILL REACT.
HE'S ONLY BEEN IN OFFICE FOR A REACT.
HE'S ONLY BEEN IN OFFICE FOR A FEW WEEKS.
HE'S ONLY BEEN IN OFFICE FOR A FEW WEEKS.
THIS IS WHEN MISTAKES GET MADE FEW WEEKS.
THIS IS WHEN MISTAKES GET MADE WHEN YOU GET PEOPLE WHO ARE THIS IS WHEN MISTAKES GET MADE WHEN YOU GET PEOPLE WHO ARE INEXPERIENCED AND NIDE TO PROVE WHEN YOU GET PEOPLE WHO ARE INEXPERIENCED AND NIDE TO PROVE THEMSELVES.
INEXPERIENCED AND NIDE TO PROVE THEMSELVES.
>> SO IF IT'S NOT US THAT HE THEMSELVES.
>> SO IF IT'S NOT US THAT HE DECIDES TO ATTACK, WHERE ELSE >> SO IF IT'S NOT US THAT HE DECIDES TO ATTACK, WHERE ELSE COULD THEY GO?
DECIDES TO ATTACK, WHERE ELSE COULD THEY GO?
>> WELL, HE'S NEVER ATTACKED THE COULD THEY GO?
>> WELL, HE'S NEVER ATTACKED THE UNITED STATES, YOU KNOW, IN ANY >> WELL, HE'S NEVER ATTACKED THE UNITED STATES, YOU KNOW, IN ANY KIND OF CORRECT WAY AND THE UNITED STATES, YOU KNOW, IN ANY KIND OF CORRECT WAY AND THE NORTH KOREANS USUALLY HAVE NOT.
KIND OF CORRECT WAY AND THE NORTH KOREANS USUALLY HAVE NOT.
THEY DID SYNC A SOUTH KOREAN NORTH KOREANS USUALLY HAVE NOT.
THEY DID SYNC A SOUTH KOREAN SHIP BUT IT TOOK MONTHS TO THEY DID SYNC A SOUTH KOREAN SHIP BUT IT TOOK MONTHS TO FIGURE OUT THEY WERE HIT BY A SHIP BUT IT TOOK MONTHS TO FIGURE OUT THEY WERE HIT BY A NORTH KOREAN MINI SUB AND FIGURE OUT THEY WERE HIT BY A NORTH KOREAN MINI SUB AND TORPEDO AND THERE WAS NO NORTH KOREAN MINI SUB AND TORPEDO AND THERE WAS NO RETALIATION.
TORPEDO AND THERE WAS NO RETALIATION.
THEY DID SHELL A VERY LIGHTLY RETALIATION.
THEY DID SHELL A VERY LIGHTLY POPULATED ISLAND ABOUT THREE THEY DID SHELL A VERY LIGHTLY POPULATED ISLAND ABOUT THREE YEARS AGO.
POPULATED ISLAND ABOUT THREE YEARS AGO.
AGAIN THE SOUTH KOREAN RESPONSE YEARS AGO.
AGAIN THE SOUTH KOREAN RESPONSE WAS QUITE INEFFECTIVE.
AGAIN THE SOUTH KOREAN RESPONSE WAS QUITE INEFFECTIVE.
THAT'S WHY MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE WAS QUITE INEFFECTIVE.
THAT'S WHY MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT PRESIDENT PARK IS GOING TO THAT'S WHY MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT PRESIDENT PARK IS GOING TO HAVE TO RESPOND.
THAT PRESIDENT PARK IS GOING TO HAVE TO RESPOND.
>> AND ARE THEY TRYING TO GET US HAVE TO RESPOND.
>> AND ARE THEY TRYING TO GET US TO RESPOND, US MEANING THE U.S. >> AND ARE THEY TRYING TO GET US TO RESPOND, US MEANING THE U.S. TO RESPOND TO ANY PROVOCATION TO RESPOND, US MEANING THE U.S. TO RESPOND TO ANY PROVOCATION ANYWHERE IN THE AREA?
TO RESPOND TO ANY PROVOCATION ANYWHERE IN THE AREA?
>> YOU KNOW, IT'S PROBABLY ANYWHERE IN THE AREA?
>> YOU KNOW, IT'S PROBABLY LIKELY THAT THEY WOULD TRY A >> YOU KNOW, IT'S PROBABLY LIKELY THAT THEY WOULD TRY A PROVOCATION THAT WOULD STOP JUST LIKELY THAT THEY WOULD TRY A PROVOCATION THAT WOULD STOP JUST SHORT OF GIVING THE U.S.
INTO A PROVOCATION THAT WOULD STOP JUST SHORT OF GIVING THE U.S.
INTO A RESPONSE.
SHORT OF GIVING THE U.S.
INTO A RESPONSE.
AND THE BIG CONCERN YOU HEAR IN RESPONSE.
AND THE BIG CONCERN YOU HEAR IN THE PENTAGON IS WHAT STOPS THE AND THE BIG CONCERN YOU HEAR IN THE PENTAGON IS WHAT STOPS THE ESCALATION?
THE PENTAGON IS WHAT STOPS THE ESCALATION?
IF THE SOUTH KOREANS STRIKE BACK ESCALATION?
IF THE SOUTH KOREANS STRIKE BACK AND THEN SUDDENLY YOU'RE INTO IF THE SOUTH KOREANS STRIKE BACK AND THEN SUDDENLY YOU'RE INTO SOMETHING AND WE DON'T AND THEN SUDDENLY YOU'RE INTO SOMETHING AND WE DON'T UNDERSTAND IT AND THEY CUT ALL SOMETHING AND WE DON'T UNDERSTAND IT AND THEY CUT ALL THE COMMUNICATIONS LINES TO UNDERSTAND IT AND THEY CUT ALL THE COMMUNICATIONS LINES TO KOREA, SO THERE'S THAT SCAPE THE COMMUNICATIONS LINES TO KOREA, SO THERE'S THAT SCAPE VALVE.
KOREA, SO THERE'S THAT SCAPE VALVE.
>> DO THEY SEE NORTH KOREA AS VALVE.
>> DO THEY SEE NORTH KOREA AS GOOD TO KEEP THEM THERE SO WE >> DO THEY SEE NORTH KOREA AS GOOD TO KEEP THEM THERE SO WE DON'T GET TOO CLOSE TO THEIR GOOD TO KEEP THEM THERE SO WE DON'T GET TOO CLOSE TO THEIR BORDER?
DON'T GET TOO CLOSE TO THEIR BORDER?
>> A LITTLE BIT OF BOTH.
BORDER?
>> A LITTLE BIT OF BOTH.
THE TRADITIONAL CHINESE POSITION >> A LITTLE BIT OF BOTH.
THE TRADITIONAL CHINESE POSITION -- OF COURSE THE CHINESE WERE THE TRADITIONAL CHINESE POSITION -- OF COURSE THE CHINESE WERE BIG SUPPORTERS OF NORTH KOREA.
-- OF COURSE THE CHINESE WERE BIG SUPPORTERS OF NORTH KOREA.
TRADITIONAL POSITION IS THAT BIG SUPPORTERS OF NORTH KOREA.
TRADITIONAL POSITION IS THAT NORTH KOREA IS A BUFFER THAT TRADITIONAL POSITION IS THAT NORTH KOREA IS A BUFFER THAT KEEPS THEM AWAY FROM THE CHINESE NORTH KOREA IS A BUFFER THAT KEEPS THEM AWAY FROM THE CHINESE BORDER.
KEEPS THEM AWAY FROM THE CHINESE BORDER.
IF YOU LISTEN TO WHAT THE BORDER.
IF YOU LISTEN TO WHAT THE CHINESE ARE SAYING THEY ARE IF YOU LISTEN TO WHAT THE CHINESE ARE SAYING THEY ARE GETTING TIRED OF ALL OF THESE CHINESE ARE SAYING THEY ARE GETTING TIRED OF ALL OF THESE ACTS.
GETTING TIRED OF ALL OF THESE ACTS.
YOU'VE GOT SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC ACTS.
YOU'VE GOT SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC INVESTMENTS WITH SOUTH KOREA.
YOU'VE GOT SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC INVESTMENTS WITH SOUTH KOREA.
AND THEY'VE GOT TO CHOOSE INVESTMENTS WITH SOUTH KOREA.
AND THEY'VE GOT TO CHOOSE BETWEEN A NORTH KOREA THAT'S AND THEY'VE GOT TO CHOOSE BETWEEN A NORTH KOREA THAT'S STARVING AND ALWAYS WANTS MONEY, BETWEEN A NORTH KOREA THAT'S STARVING AND ALWAYS WANTS MONEY, OIL AND A SOUTH KOREA THAT CAN STARVING AND ALWAYS WANTS MONEY, OIL AND A SOUTH KOREA THAT CAN PROVIDE THEM WITH SAMSUNG CELL OIL AND A SOUTH KOREA THAT CAN PROVIDE THEM WITH SAMSUNG CELL PHONES.
PROVIDE THEM WITH SAMSUNG CELL PHONES.
AND THAT'S A VERY BIG PHONES.
AND THAT'S A VERY BIG DIFFERENCE.
AND THAT'S A VERY BIG DIFFERENCE.
THE QUESTION IS ARE THEY WILLING DIFFERENCE.
THE QUESTION IS ARE THEY WILLING TO TURN THE SCREWS ON THE NORTH THE QUESTION IS ARE THEY WILLING TO TURN THE SCREWS ON THE NORTH KOREANS?
TO TURN THE SCREWS ON THE NORTH KOREANS?
AND THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY TO DO KOREANS?
AND THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY TO DO THAT, IT'S TO TURN OFF THE OIL.
AND THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY TO DO THAT, IT'S TO TURN OFF THE OIL.
>> THIS IS SOMETHING THAT MOST THAT, IT'S TO TURN OFF THE OIL.
>> THIS IS SOMETHING THAT MOST PRESIDENTS HAVE KICKED DOWN THE >> THIS IS SOMETHING THAT MOST PRESIDENTS HAVE KICKED DOWN THE ROAD MEANING IT'S NOT TOP PRESIDENTS HAVE KICKED DOWN THE ROAD MEANING IT'S NOT TOP PRIORITY.
ROAD MEANING IT'S NOT TOP PRIORITY.
SO HAS NORTH KOREAN RISEN TO TOP PRIORITY.
SO HAS NORTH KOREAN RISEN TO TOP PRIORITY?
SO HAS NORTH KOREAN RISEN TO TOP PRIORITY?
>> WELL, IRAN IS A LONG-TERM PRIORITY?
>> WELL, IRAN IS A LONG-TERM PROBLEM BECAUSE OF THE REGION >> WELL, IRAN IS A LONG-TERM PROBLEM BECAUSE OF THE REGION IT'S IN AND IF THEY DID GET A PROBLEM BECAUSE OF THE REGION IT'S IN AND IF THEY DID GET A WEAPON IT COULD START IT'S IN AND IF THEY DID GET A WEAPON IT COULD START PROLIFERATION THROUGHOUT THE WEAPON IT COULD START PROLIFERATION THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST.
PROLIFERATION THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST.
THEY ALREADY HAVE WEAPONS, MIDDLE EAST.
THEY ALREADY HAVE WEAPONS, MISSILES AND THEY'RE MORE THEY ALREADY HAVE WEAPONS, MISSILES AND THEY'RE MORE UNPREDICTABLE.
MISSILES AND THEY'RE MORE UNPREDICTABLE.
GWEN: THE RED LINE WAS ALREADY UNPREDICTABLE.
GWEN: THE RED LINE WAS ALREADY CROSSED.
GWEN: THE RED LINE WAS ALREADY CROSSED.
>> IT WAS CROSSED SO LONG AGO CROSSED.
>> IT WAS CROSSED SO LONG AGO PEOPLE CAN'T EVEN SEE IT IN >> IT WAS CROSSED SO LONG AGO PEOPLE CAN'T EVEN SEE IT IN THEIR REAR VIEW MIRRORS.
PEOPLE CAN'T EVEN SEE IT IN THEIR REAR VIEW MIRRORS.
GWEN: THE SENATE STEAM BE ON THE THEIR REAR VIEW MIRRORS.
GWEN: THE SENATE STEAM BE ON THE VERGE OF AN OUTBREAK ON GWEN: THE SENATE STEAM BE ON THE VERGE OF AN OUTBREAK ON AGREEMENT ON IMMIGRATION.
VERGE OF AN OUTBREAK ON AGREEMENT ON IMMIGRATION.
THE GANG OF EIGHT SIGNALED THAT AGREEMENT ON IMMIGRATION.
THE GANG OF EIGHT SIGNALED THAT THEY HAVE IRONED OUT THE DETAILS THE GANG OF EIGHT SIGNALED THAT THEY HAVE IRONED OUT THE DETAILS OF A SWEEPING COMPROMISE BUT THE THEY HAVE IRONED OUT THE DETAILS OF A SWEEPING COMPROMISE BUT THE DEAL IS FAR FROM DONE.
OF A SWEEPING COMPROMISE BUT THE DEAL IS FAR FROM DONE.
WHERE DOES IT STAND?
DEAL IS FAR FROM DONE.
WHERE DOES IT STAND?
>> WE'RE GOING TO FIND A LITTLE WHERE DOES IT STAND?
>> WE'RE GOING TO FIND A LITTLE BIT MORE WHEN THE SENATE RETURNS >> WE'RE GOING TO FIND A LITTLE BIT MORE WHEN THE SENATE RETURNS NEXT WEEK.
BIT MORE WHEN THE SENATE RETURNS NEXT WEEK.
THE SENATORS, THE GANG LEFT NEXT WEEK.
THE SENATORS, THE GANG LEFT BEFORE THE EASTER BREAK WITH THE THE SENATORS, THE GANG LEFT BEFORE THE EASTER BREAK WITH THE EXPECTATIONS THEY WOULD INK OUT BEFORE THE EASTER BREAK WITH THE EXPECTATIONS THEY WOULD INK OUT THE ENTIRE PROPOSAL AND THEY EXPECTATIONS THEY WOULD INK OUT THE ENTIRE PROPOSAL AND THEY WOULD HAVE THE STAFF PUT IT INTO THE ENTIRE PROPOSAL AND THEY WOULD HAVE THE STAFF PUT IT INTO LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE.
WOULD HAVE THE STAFF PUT IT INTO LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE.
THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN BECAUSE OF LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE.
THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN BECAUSE OF THE LAST MINUTE WALK OUT.
THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN BECAUSE OF THE LAST MINUTE WALK OUT.
THE DISPUTE WAS BETWEEN LABOR THE LAST MINUTE WALK OUT.
THE DISPUTE WAS BETWEEN LABOR AND BUSINESS ON WHAT THEY CALL THE DISPUTE WAS BETWEEN LABOR AND BUSINESS ON WHAT THEY CALL THE FUTURE FLOW.
AND BUSINESS ON WHAT THEY CALL THE FUTURE FLOW.
THIS IS THE FUTURE LOW SKILLED THE FUTURE FLOW.
THIS IS THE FUTURE LOW SKILLED WORKERS WHO ARE GOING TO COME IN THIS IS THE FUTURE LOW SKILLED WORKERS WHO ARE GOING TO COME IN FROM OTHER COUNTRIES.
WORKERS WHO ARE GOING TO COME IN FROM OTHER COUNTRIES.
KEEP IN MIND WE HAVE 11 MILLION FROM OTHER COUNTRIES.
KEEP IN MIND WE HAVE 11 MILLION HERE WHO ARE DOING THESE KIND OF KEEP IN MIND WE HAVE 11 MILLION HERE WHO ARE DOING THESE KIND OF JOBS, WE'RE TALKING CLEANING HERE WHO ARE DOING THESE KIND OF JOBS, WE'RE TALKING CLEANING HOTEL, JANITORIAL WORK, JOBS, WE'RE TALKING CLEANING HOTEL, JANITORIAL WORK, RESTAURANT WORK.
HOTEL, JANITORIAL WORK, RESTAURANT WORK.
IN ORDER TO -- TO AVOID THE RESTAURANT WORK.
IN ORDER TO -- TO AVOID THE PROBLEM THAT HAPPENED IN 1986, IN ORDER TO -- TO AVOID THE PROBLEM THAT HAPPENED IN 1986, THE LAST TIME THEY LEGALIZED THE PROBLEM THAT HAPPENED IN 1986, THE LAST TIME THEY LEGALIZED THE ILLEGAL POPULATION THEY WANT TO THE LAST TIME THEY LEGALIZED THE ILLEGAL POPULATION THEY WANT TO CREATE SOME SORT OF WORK VISA TO ILLEGAL POPULATION THEY WANT TO CREATE SOME SORT OF WORK VISA TO ALLOW NEW PEOPLE TO COME IN AND CREATE SOME SORT OF WORK VISA TO ALLOW NEW PEOPLE TO COME IN AND FILL THOSE JOBS.
ALLOW NEW PEOPLE TO COME IN AND FILL THOSE JOBS.
>> TEMPORARILY.
FILL THOSE JOBS.
>> TEMPORARILY.
>> TEMPORARILY BUT WITH THE >> TEMPORARILY.
>> TEMPORARILY BUT WITH THE OPTION TO STAY IF THEY WOULD >> TEMPORARILY BUT WITH THE OPTION TO STAY IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO.
OPTION TO STAY IF THEY WOULD LIKE TO.
>> THE LABOR DIDN'T LIKE THAT.
LIKE TO.
>> THE LABOR DIDN'T LIKE THAT.
>> WHAT LABOR IS CONCERNED ABOUT >> THE LABOR DIDN'T LIKE THAT.
>> WHAT LABOR IS CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS.
>> WHAT LABOR IS CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS.
IT GETS VERY COMPLICATED VERY A NUMBER OF THINGS.
IT GETS VERY COMPLICATED VERY QUICKLY.
IT GETS VERY COMPLICATED VERY QUICKLY.
BUT THE BROAD -- THE BROAD BRUSH QUICKLY.
BUT THE BROAD -- THE BROAD BRUSH OF IT IS THAT IN 1986 PRESIDENT BUT THE BROAD -- THE BROAD BRUSH OF IT IS THAT IN 1986 PRESIDENT REGAN LEGALIZED THREE MILLION OF IT IS THAT IN 1986 PRESIDENT REGAN LEGALIZED THREE MILLION ILLEGAL ALIEN BUT -- ALIENS BUT REGAN LEGALIZED THREE MILLION ILLEGAL ALIEN BUT -- ALIENS BUT DID NOT CREATE A WAY TO DO THAT ILLEGAL ALIEN BUT -- ALIENS BUT DID NOT CREATE A WAY TO DO THAT IN THE FUTURE.
DID NOT CREATE A WAY TO DO THAT IN THE FUTURE.
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING THE IN THE FUTURE.
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING THE SAME THING BUT WE NEED TO COME WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING THE SAME THING BUT WE NEED TO COME UP WITH A WAY TO DEAL WITH THE SAME THING BUT WE NEED TO COME UP WITH A WAY TO DEAL WITH THE FUTURE FLOW.
UP WITH A WAY TO DEAL WITH THE FUTURE FLOW.
THE PROBLEM THAT LABOR HAS IS FUTURE FLOW.
THE PROBLEM THAT LABOR HAS IS THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO SEE TOO THE PROBLEM THAT LABOR HAS IS THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO SEE TOO MANY OF THESE -- OF THESE THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO SEE TOO MANY OF THESE -- OF THESE FOREIGNERS COME IN AND TAKE MANY OF THESE -- OF THESE FOREIGNERS COME IN AND TAKE THESE JOBS THAT THEY THINK THE FOREIGNERS COME IN AND TAKE THESE JOBS THAT THEY THINK THE RIGHTS SHOULD GO TO AMERICANS.
THESE JOBS THAT THEY THINK THE RIGHTS SHOULD GO TO AMERICANS.
THE GANG OF EIGHT HAS SAID LABOR RIGHTS SHOULD GO TO AMERICANS.
THE GANG OF EIGHT HAS SAID LABOR AND BUSINESS, U.S. CHAMBER OF THE GANG OF EIGHT HAS SAID LABOR AND BUSINESS, U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, YOU GUYS FIGURE IT AND BUSINESS, U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, YOU GUYS FIGURE IT OUT.
COMMERCE, YOU GUYS FIGURE IT OUT.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME SORT OF OUT.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME SORT OF PROGRAM LIKE THIS.
WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME SORT OF PROGRAM LIKE THIS.
I DON'T THINK THEY'RE TOO FAR PROGRAM LIKE THIS.
I DON'T THINK THEY'RE TOO FAR OFF.
I DON'T THINK THEY'RE TOO FAR OFF.
BUT THEY'RE STILL TUGGING ON THE OFF.
BUT THEY'RE STILL TUGGING ON THE NUMBERS.
BUT THEY'RE STILL TUGGING ON THE NUMBERS.
>> WHAT ABOUT -- I GUESS I -- NUMBERS.
>> WHAT ABOUT -- I GUESS I -- ONE REAL BIG QUESTION IS ABOUT >> WHAT ABOUT -- I GUESS I -- ONE REAL BIG QUESTION IS ABOUT MARCO RUBIO.
ONE REAL BIG QUESTION IS ABOUT MARCO RUBIO.
AND HE'S THE GUY THAT WE SPEND MARCO RUBIO.
AND HE'S THE GUY THAT WE SPEND SO MUCH TIME TALKING ABOUT.
AND HE'S THE GUY THAT WE SPEND SO MUCH TIME TALKING ABOUT.
HE'S SUPPOSED TO BE THE LEADER SO MUCH TIME TALKING ABOUT.
HE'S SUPPOSED TO BE THE LEADER OF THIS GANG AND YET HE WAS THE HE'S SUPPOSED TO BE THE LEADER OF THIS GANG AND YET HE WAS THE ONE THAT SORT OF BROKE OUT FIRST OF THIS GANG AND YET HE WAS THE ONE THAT SORT OF BROKE OUT FIRST AND FOREMOST SAYING THIS ISN'T A ONE THAT SORT OF BROKE OUT FIRST AND FOREMOST SAYING THIS ISN'T A DONE DEAL.
AND FOREMOST SAYING THIS ISN'T A DONE DEAL.
AND THE SECOND THING IS WHERE DONE DEAL.
AND THE SECOND THING IS WHERE THE HOUSE FITS INTO ALL OF THIS AND THE SECOND THING IS WHERE THE HOUSE FITS INTO ALL OF THIS BECAUSE THAT'S REALLY WHERE THE THE HOUSE FITS INTO ALL OF THIS BECAUSE THAT'S REALLY WHERE THE HARD LINERS ARE AND THAT TO ME BECAUSE THAT'S REALLY WHERE THE HARD LINERS ARE AND THAT TO ME SEEMS THE HARDEST PLACE TO GET HARD LINERS ARE AND THAT TO ME SEEMS THE HARDEST PLACE TO GET AN IMMIGRATION BILL TO GET SEEMS THE HARDEST PLACE TO GET AN IMMIGRATION BILL TO GET THROUGH.
AN IMMIGRATION BILL TO GET THROUGH.
>> IT'S BEEN PERFORMED IN TWO THROUGH.
>> IT'S BEEN PERFORMED IN TWO DIFFERENT PARTS.
>> IT'S BEEN PERFORMED IN TWO DIFFERENT PARTS.
I WOULD NOT THINK THAT MARCO DIFFERENT PARTS.
I WOULD NOT THINK THAT MARCO RUBIO IS THE LEADER OF THIS I WOULD NOT THINK THAT MARCO RUBIO IS THE LEADER OF THIS GANG.
RUBIO IS THE LEADER OF THIS GANG.
THAT FALLS MORE TO CHUCK SCHUMER GANG.
THAT FALLS MORE TO CHUCK SCHUMER FROM NEW YORK AND CAIN FROM THAT FALLS MORE TO CHUCK SCHUMER FROM NEW YORK AND CAIN FROM ARIZONA.
FROM NEW YORK AND CAIN FROM ARIZONA.
THE ROAD THAT RUBIO PLAYS IS THE ARIZONA.
THE ROAD THAT RUBIO PLAYS IS THE LYNCH PEN.
THE ROAD THAT RUBIO PLAYS IS THE LYNCH PEN.
IF HE WALKS, THE DEAL DIES.
LYNCH PEN.
IF HE WALKS, THE DEAL DIES.
AND HE'S WELL AWARE OF THAT.
IF HE WALKS, THE DEAL DIES.
AND HE'S WELL AWARE OF THAT.
PART OF WHAT HE'S DOING LAST AND HE'S WELL AWARE OF THAT.
PART OF WHAT HE'S DOING LAST WEEK WHEN THEY WERE TRYING TO PART OF WHAT HE'S DOING LAST WEEK WHEN THEY WERE TRYING TO SAY THERE IS A DEAL, THERE IS A WEEK WHEN THEY WERE TRYING TO SAY THERE IS A DEAL, THERE IS A DEAL.
SAY THERE IS A DEAL, THERE IS A DEAL.
HOLD ON.
DEAL.
HOLD ON.
NO, NO.
HOLD ON.
NO, NO.
NOT DONE YET.
NO, NO.
NOT DONE YET.
WE NEED MARCO RUBIO IN THE ROOM NOT DONE YET.
WE NEED MARCO RUBIO IN THE ROOM BECAUSE WITHOUT HIM HE NEEDS TO WE NEED MARCO RUBIO IN THE ROOM BECAUSE WITHOUT HIM HE NEEDS TO HAVE THE CONSERVATIVE TEA PARTY.
BECAUSE WITHOUT HIM HE NEEDS TO HAVE THE CONSERVATIVE TEA PARTY.
>> AND THAT'S THE NEXT PHASE OF HAVE THE CONSERVATIVE TEA PARTY.
>> AND THAT'S THE NEXT PHASE OF THIS THAT THERE'S A COUPLE OF >> AND THAT'S THE NEXT PHASE OF THIS THAT THERE'S A COUPLE OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE RAUL THIS THAT THERE'S A COUPLE OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE RAUL LABRADOR IS FROM WHAT I CAN TELL MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE RAUL LABRADOR IS FROM WHAT I CAN TELL THE REAL LEADER FROM THE TEA LABRADOR IS FROM WHAT I CAN TELL THE REAL LEADER FROM THE TEA PARTIES.
THE REAL LEADER FROM THE TEA PARTIES.
ALL OF THEM ARE WASHINGTONNING PARTIES.
ALL OF THEM ARE WASHINGTONNING WHAT HE'S DOING.
ALL OF THEM ARE WASHINGTONNING WHAT HE'S DOING.
I THINK THEY'RE WILLING TO TALK WHAT HE'S DOING.
I THINK THEY'RE WILLING TO TALK ABOUT IT MUCH THE SAME WAY THAT I THINK THEY'RE WILLING TO TALK ABOUT IT MUCH THE SAME WAY THAT MARCOIO IS.
ABOUT IT MUCH THE SAME WAY THAT MARCOIO IS.
THERE ARE SECRET BUT THEY ARE AS MARCOIO IS.
THERE ARE SECRET BUT THEY ARE AS SECRET AS ANYTHING IN THERE ARE SECRET BUT THEY ARE AS SECRET AS ANYTHING IN WASHINGTON.
SECRET AS ANYTHING IN WASHINGTON.
>> HOW DOES THIS GO FROM TALKS WASHINGTON.
>> HOW DOES THIS GO FROM TALKS TO LEGISLATION?
>> HOW DOES THIS GO FROM TALKS TO LEGISLATION?
>> A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT THAT TO LEGISLATION?
>> A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT THAT I'M NOT QUITE SURE.
>> A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT THAT I'M NOT QUITE SURE.
ONE IS WHAT KIND OF BORDER I'M NOT QUITE SURE.
ONE IS WHAT KIND OF BORDER SECURITY BENCHMARKS TO DO YOU ONE IS WHAT KIND OF BORDER SECURITY BENCHMARKS TO DO YOU NEED IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE REST SECURITY BENCHMARKS TO DO YOU NEED IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE REST OF THE PROCESS TO GO FORWARD?
NEED IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE REST OF THE PROCESS TO GO FORWARD?
AND WHEN ARE THEY PUT IN PLACE.
OF THE PROCESS TO GO FORWARD?
AND WHEN ARE THEY PUT IN PLACE.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN AND WHEN ARE THEY PUT IN PLACE.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN NEGOTIATE IT BY DEGREES.
THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN NEGOTIATE IT BY DEGREES.
>> CERTAIN THINGS HAPPEN.
NEGOTIATE IT BY DEGREES.
>> CERTAIN THINGS HAPPEN.
>> RIGHT.
>> CERTAIN THINGS HAPPEN.
>> RIGHT.
SO THERE'S BORDA ER SECURITY >> RIGHT.
SO THERE'S BORDA ER SECURITY ELEMENT TO THAT.
SO THERE'S BORDA ER SECURITY ELEMENT TO THAT.
THE OTHER THING THAT HAS NOT ELEMENT TO THAT.
THE OTHER THING THAT HAS NOT BEEN RESOLVED AND THIS IS THE THE OTHER THING THAT HAS NOT BEEN RESOLVED AND THIS IS THE PLACE WHERE UNIONS AND BUSINESS BEEN RESOLVED AND THIS IS THE PLACE WHERE UNIONS AND BUSINESS E NEARGOTIATING IT.
PLACE WHERE UNIONS AND BUSINESS E NEARGOTIATING IT.
WHAT ARE THE OVERALL NUMBERS?
E NEARGOTIATING IT.
WHAT ARE THE OVERALL NUMBERS?
HOW MANY NEW IMMIGRANTS CAN WE WHAT ARE THE OVERALL NUMBERS?
HOW MANY NEW IMMIGRANTS CAN WE ACCEPT INTO THE COUNTRY ON ANY HOW MANY NEW IMMIGRANTS CAN WE ACCEPT INTO THE COUNTRY ON ANY GIVEN YEAR?
ACCEPT INTO THE COUNTRY ON ANY GIVEN YEAR?
WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT GIVEN YEAR?
WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT HAVING SOME SORT OF ECONOMIC WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT HAVING SOME SORT OF ECONOMIC MODEL WHEN THE NEED GOES UP, YOU HAVING SOME SORT OF ECONOMIC MODEL WHEN THE NEED GOES UP, YOU ALLOW MORE PEOPLE.
MODEL WHEN THE NEED GOES UP, YOU ALLOW MORE PEOPLE.
BUT THE LAST I CHECKED THE ALLOW MORE PEOPLE.
BUT THE LAST I CHECKED THE NUMBERS WERE VERY FAR APART.
BUT THE LAST I CHECKED THE NUMBERS WERE VERY FAR APART.
YOU'VE GOT THE BUSINESS SAYING NUMBERS WERE VERY FAR APART.
YOU'VE GOT THE BUSINESS SAYING WE NEED $300,000.
YOU'VE GOT THE BUSINESS SAYING WE NEED $300,000.
>> IT SEEMS THAT IT WAS A LITTLE WE NEED $300,000.
>> IT SEEMS THAT IT WAS A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN WHAT WE'RE >> IT SEEMS THAT IT WAS A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN WHAT WE'RE ACCUSTOMED TO.
BIT MORE THAN WHAT WE'RE ACCUSTOMED TO.
>> THINK -- I THINK HE WAS ACCUSTOMED TO.
>> THINK -- I THINK HE WAS TRYING TO IMITATE PRESIDENT >> THINK -- I THINK HE WAS TRYING TO IMITATE PRESIDENT KENNEDY.
TRYING TO IMITATE PRESIDENT KENNEDY.
SO THIS IS -- IT'S HARD TO FILL KENNEDY.
SO THIS IS -- IT'S HARD TO FILL THAT ROLL.
SO THIS IS -- IT'S HARD TO FILL THAT ROLL.
HE'S A REAL DEAL-MAKER.
THAT ROLL.
HE'S A REAL DEAL-MAKER.
AND HE'S VERY GOOD AT TUGGING A HE'S A REAL DEAL-MAKER.
AND HE'S VERY GOOD AT TUGGING A GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE AND HE'S VERY GOOD AT TUGGING A GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE TOGETHER.
GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE TOGETHER.
HE'S FAMOUS FOR DOING THINGS TOGETHER.
HE'S FAMOUS FOR DOING THINGS LIKE SCHEDULE LING PRESS HE'S FAMOUS FOR DOING THINGS LIKE SCHEDULE LING PRESS CONFERENCES RIGHT BEFORE THEY LIKE SCHEDULE LING PRESS CONFERENCES RIGHT BEFORE THEY ARE ACTUALLY HAVE A DEAL TO SAY CONFERENCES RIGHT BEFORE THEY ARE ACTUALLY HAVE A DEAL TO SAY THAT WE HAVE A DEAL.
ARE ACTUALLY HAVE A DEAL TO SAY THAT WE HAVE A DEAL.
D I THINK THAT HIS -- THAT'S THAT WE HAVE A DEAL.
D I THINK THAT HIS -- THAT'S REALLY BEEN HIS ROLE.
D I THINK THAT HIS -- THAT'S REALLY BEEN HIS ROLE.
WE'LL BE SEEING A LOT OF CHUCK REALLY BEEN HIS ROLE.
WE'LL BE SEEING A LOT OF CHUCK SCHUMER.
WE'LL BE SEEING A LOT OF CHUCK SCHUMER.
>> NO CHANGE THERE.
SCHUMER.
>> NO CHANGE THERE.
GWEN: FINALLY TONIGHT, SPEAKING >> NO CHANGE THERE.
GWEN: FINALLY TONIGHT, SPEAKING OF POLITICS, POLITICS AT THE GWEN: FINALLY TONIGHT, SPEAKING OF POLITICS, POLITICS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR, I OF POLITICS, POLITICS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR, I PROMISED -- I PROMISED WE WOULD BEGINNING OF THE YEAR, I PROMISED -- I PROMISED WE WOULD RESIST TALKING ABOUT THE 2016 HE PROMISED -- I PROMISED WE WOULD RESIST TALKING ABOUT THE 2016 HE CAMPAIGN FOR THROAST AS WE RESIST TALKING ABOUT THE 2016 HE CAMPAIGN FOR THROAST AS WE HUMANLY COULD.
CAMPAIGN FOR THROAST AS WE HUMANLY COULD.
WELL, I NO LONGER HUMANLY CAN.
HUMANLY COULD.
WELL, I NO LONGER HUMANLY CAN.
HILLARY CLINTON POPPED UP ON THE WELL, I NO LONGER HUMANLY CAN.
HILLARY CLINTON POPPED UP ON THE SAME STAY AND STIRS THE POT HILLARY CLINTON POPPED UP ON THE SAME STAY AND STIRS THE POT VIGOROUSLY.
SAME STAY AND STIRS THE POT VIGOROUSLY.
IS SHE RUNNING OR NOT?
VIGOROUSLY.
IS SHE RUNNING OR NOT?
>> WE REALLY DID BREAK OUR CODE.
IS SHE RUNNING OR NOT?
>> WE REALLY DID BREAK OUR CODE.
IT'S TOO HARD.
>> WE REALLY DID BREAK OUR CODE.
IT'S TOO HARD.
WE'RE ONLY HUMAN.
IT'S TOO HARD.
WE'RE ONLY HUMAN.
EVERYTHING THAT HILLARY DOES IS WE'RE ONLY HUMAN.
EVERYTHING THAT HILLARY DOES IS GOING TO BE ANALYZE DEATH.
EVERYTHING THAT HILLARY DOES IS GOING TO BE ANALYZE DEATH.
IF SHE BLOWS HER NOSE.
GOING TO BE ANALYZE DEATH.
IF SHE BLOWS HER NOSE.
WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF IF SHE BLOWS HER NOSE.
WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF KLEENEX.
WE WANT TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF KLEENEX.
IS A KHALI NEXT FROM SOUTH KLEENEX.
IS A KHALI NEXT FROM SOUTH CAROLINA.
IS A KHALI NEXT FROM SOUTH CAROLINA.
WE ARE LOOKING AT THREE BIG CAROLINA.
WE ARE LOOKING AT THREE BIG THINGS TO LET YOU KNOW SHE'S WE ARE LOOKING AT THREE BIG THINGS TO LET YOU KNOW SHE'S VERY SERIOUS.
THINGS TO LET YOU KNOW SHE'S VERY SERIOUS.
SHE MAY NOT DO THIS.
VERY SERIOUS.
SHE MAY NOT DO THIS.
THE ONE IS TALKING ABOUT ISSUES.
SHE MAY NOT DO THIS.
THE ONE IS TALKING ABOUT ISSUES.
WHICH IRAN SHOES DOES SHE DESEED THE ONE IS TALKING ABOUT ISSUES.
WHICH IRAN SHOES DOES SHE DESEED TO TALK ABOUT?
WHICH IRAN SHOES DOES SHE DESEED TO TALK ABOUT?
I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT TO TALK ABOUT?
I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT SHE PUT IN A SIX MINUTE VIDEO I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT SHE PUT IN A SIX MINUTE VIDEO TOGETHER TO EXPLAIN HER CHANGE SHE PUT IN A SIX MINUTE VIDEO TOGETHER TO EXPLAIN HER CHANGE OF POSITION ON GAY MARRIAGE.
TOGETHER TO EXPLAIN HER CHANGE OF POSITION ON GAY MARRIAGE.
THAT WAS THE ONE ISSUE THAT SHE OF POSITION ON GAY MARRIAGE.
THAT WAS THE ONE ISSUE THAT SHE WAS RIGHT ON THE DEMOCRATIC THAT WAS THE ONE ISSUE THAT SHE WAS RIGHT ON THE DEMOCRATIC BASE.
WAS RIGHT ON THE DEMOCRATIC BASE.
UNLIKE OTHER POLITICIANS WHO MAY BASE.
UNLIKE OTHER POLITICIANS WHO MAY RUN, SO SHE HAS A LOT MORE UNLIKE OTHER POLITICIANS WHO MAY RUN, SO SHE HAS A LOT MORE REASON TO GO WITH HERER.
RUN, SO SHE HAS A LOT MORE REASON TO GO WITH HERER.
AND THE SECOND WHAT ARE THE REASON TO GO WITH HERER.
AND THE SECOND WHAT ARE THE ALLIES DOING?
AND THE SECOND WHAT ARE THE ALLIES DOING?
IT'S VERY SIGNIFICANT THAT THIS ALLIES DOING?
IT'S VERY SIGNIFICANT THAT THIS WEEK, JAMES CARVILLE, A IT'S VERY SIGNIFICANT THAT THIS WEEK, JAMES CARVILLE, A CLINTON-ITE DECIDED TO JUMP ON WEEK, JAMES CARVILLE, A CLINTON-ITE DECIDED TO JUMP ON THE BANDWAGON SAYING WE GOT THE CLINTON-ITE DECIDED TO JUMP ON THE BANDWAGON SAYING WE GOT THE FERRARI.
THE BANDWAGON SAYING WE GOT THE FERRARI.
I DON'T KNOW IF FERRARI.
I DON'T KNOW IF HE SAID FERRARI.
I DON'T KNOW IF HE SAID FERRARI.
IT WAS SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT.
HE SAID FERRARI.
IT WAS SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT.
THE LAST THING IS YOU KNOW, HOW IT WAS SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT.
THE LAST THING IS YOU KNOW, HOW SHE CHOOSES TO MAKE MONEY AND THE LAST THING IS YOU KNOW, HOW SHE CHOOSES TO MAKE MONEY AND SPEND HER TIME.
SHE CHOOSES TO MAKE MONEY AND SPEND HER TIME.
WE SAW MITT ROMNEY GO OFF THE SPEND HER TIME.
WE SAW MITT ROMNEY GO OFF THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL AND GO RIGHT BACK WE SAW MITT ROMNEY GO OFF THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL AND GO RIGHT BACK UNDER THE BOARD OF MARRIOTT, CAMPAIGN TRAIL AND GO RIGHT BACK UNDER THE BOARD OF MARRIOTT, ENTURE CAPITAL WITH HIS SON.
UNDER THE BOARD OF MARRIOTT, ENTURE CAPITAL WITH HIS SON.
HILLARY CLINTON DOES SHE JUST GO ENTURE CAPITAL WITH HIS SON.
HILLARY CLINTON DOES SHE JUST GO ON THIS SPEECH CIRCUIT?
HILLARY CLINTON DOES SHE JUST GO ON THIS SPEECH CIRCUIT?
IS THAT WHAT SHE'S GOING TO BE ON THIS SPEECH CIRCUIT?
IS THAT WHAT SHE'S GOING TO BE SPENDING HER TIME DOING?
IS THAT WHAT SHE'S GOING TO BE SPENDING HER TIME DOING?
DOES SHE WANT TO GO MAKE FUN?
SPENDING HER TIME DOING?
DOES SHE WANT TO GO MAKE FUN?
AND IF SHE DOES, WHERE DOES SHE DOES SHE WANT TO GO MAKE FUN?
AND IF SHE DOES, WHERE DOES SHE GO DO THAT AND WHAT SORT OF AND IF SHE DOES, WHERE DOES SHE GO DO THAT AND WHAT SORT OF POTENTIAL PITFALLS?
GO DO THAT AND WHAT SORT OF POTENTIAL PITFALLS?
>> AMY, AS WE'RE WATCHING ALL OF POTENTIAL PITFALLS?
>> AMY, AS WE'RE WATCHING ALL OF US LOOK AT THIS TOO EARLY, >> AMY, AS WE'RE WATCHING ALL OF US LOOK AT THIS TOO EARLY, EVERYBODY IS THINKING IT'S IN US LOOK AT THIS TOO EARLY, EVERYBODY IS THINKING IT'S IN HER INTEREST TO WAIT ON THIS EVERYBODY IS THINKING IT'S IN HER INTEREST TO WAIT ON THIS DECISION AND ANNOUNCEMENT TO HER INTEREST TO WAIT ON THIS DECISION AND ANNOUNCEMENT TO FREEZE THE MONEY AND FREEZE THE DECISION AND ANNOUNCEMENT TO FREEZE THE MONEY AND FREEZE THE DEAL.
FREEZE THE MONEY AND FREEZE THE DEAL.
>> TELL US HOW THAT STRATEGY DEAL.
>> TELL US HOW THAT STRATEGY PLAYS OUT.
>> TELL US HOW THAT STRATEGY PLAYS OUT.
WHAT DO YOU DO FOR THE LAST 30 PLAYS OUT.
WHAT DO YOU DO FOR THE LAST 30 MONTHS.
WHAT DO YOU DO FOR THE LAST 30 MONTHS.
>> WHEN DOES THAT WORK?
MONTHS.
>> WHEN DOES THAT WORK?
>> WHAT DOES?
>> WHEN DOES THAT WORK?
>> WHAT DOES?
>> THE FREING THE PILL.
>> WHAT DOES?
>> THE FREING THE PILL.
>> IF YOU TALK TO ANYONE IN JOE >> THE FREING THE PILL.
>> IF YOU TALK TO ANYONE IN JOE BIDEN'S WORK, THEY'RE RUNNING.
>> IF YOU TALK TO ANYONE IN JOE BIDEN'S WORK, THEY'RE RUNNING.
PUSH THE BUTTON.
BIDEN'S WORK, THEY'RE RUNNING.
PUSH THE BUTTON.
MARTIN O'MALLEY THE GOVERNMENT PUSH THE BUTTON.
MARTIN O'MALLEY THE GOVERNMENT NOR OF MARYLAND HE'S GOT A VERY MARTIN O'MALLEY THE GOVERNMENT NOR OF MARYLAND HE'S GOT A VERY HIGH PROFILE SCENES.
NOR OF MARYLAND HE'S GOT A VERY HIGH PROFILE SCENES.
THE GOVERNOR PUSHING AN HIGH PROFILE SCENES.
THE GOVERNOR PUSHING AN INCREDIBLY LITTLE BIT AGENDA.
THE GOVERNOR PUSHING AN INCREDIBLY LITTLE BIT AGENDA.
SO HE'S GETTING HIMSELF SETUP.
INCREDIBLY LITTLE BIT AGENDA.
SO HE'S GETTING HIMSELF SETUP.
YOU'RE NOT GOING TO I'M GOING SO HE'S GETTING HIMSELF SETUP.
YOU'RE NOT GOING TO I'M GOING THE FUNDRAISER HERE.
YOU'RE NOT GOING TO I'M GOING THE FUNDRAISER HERE.
AND THEY HAVE THEIR OPERATION IN THE FUNDRAISER HERE.
AND THEY HAVE THEIR OPERATION IN PLACE.
AND THEY HAVE THEIR OPERATION IN PLACE.
I THINK WE'RE SEEING MORE AN PLACE.
I THINK WE'RE SEEING MORE AN MORE THAT THERE MAY NOW -- I THINK WE'RE SEEING MORE AN MORE THAT THERE MAY NOW -- THERE'S A NEED FOR COMPANIES TO MORE THAT THERE MAY NOW -- THERE'S A NEED FOR COMPANIES TO RATE THEIR MONEY.
THERE'S A NEED FOR COMPANIES TO RATE THEIR MONEY.
SO WHAT ABOUT BILL?
RATE THEIR MONEY.
SO WHAT ABOUT BILL?
HE'S BEEN OUT OF THE HEAD LINES.
SO WHAT ABOUT BILL?
HE'S BEEN OUT OF THE HEAD LINES.
HE'S THE MOST POPELAR HE'S BEEN OUT OF THE HEAD LINES.
HE'S THE MOST POPELAR POLITICIAN, WELL, NEXT TO HER -- HE'S THE MOST POPELAR POLITICIAN, WELL, NEXT TO HER -- POPULAR POLITICIAN, WELL, NEXT POLITICIAN, WELL, NEXT TO HER -- POPULAR POLITICIAN, WELL, NEXT TO HER.
POPULAR POLITICIAN, WELL, NEXT TO HER.
>> MAYBE EVEN MORE.
TO HER.
>> MAYBE EVEN MORE.
>> WE ALL SAT IN FOCUS.
>> MAYBE EVEN MORE.
>> WE ALL SAT IN FOCUS.
AND WHEN THE MOTTE RAY TOR ASKED >> WE ALL SAT IN FOCUS.
AND WHEN THE MOTTE RAY TOR ASKED ABOUT POLITICAL FIGURES.
AND WHEN THE MOTTE RAY TOR ASKED ABOUT POLITICAL FIGURES.
THESE ARE SWING VOTERS.
ABOUT POLITICAL FIGURES.
THESE ARE SWING VOTERS.
THESE ARE REPUBLICANS.
THESE ARE SWING VOTERS.
THESE ARE REPUBLICANS.
OH, BIG CLINTON, WE LOVE BILL THESE ARE REPUBLICANS.
OH, BIG CLINTON, WE LOVE BILL CLINTON.
OH, BIG CLINTON, WE LOVE BILL CLINTON.
THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO 10 YEARS CLINTON.
THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO 10 YEARS WORST UGHT TO HE WAS THE THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO 10 YEARS WORST UGHT TO HE WAS THE THING LET'S FACE IT, THERE ARE A WORST UGHT TO HE WAS THE THING LET'S FACE IT, THERE ARE A WHOLE BUNCH OF PEOPLE ON THE THING LET'S FACE IT, THERE ARE A WHOLE BUNCH OF PEOPLE ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE.
WHOLE BUNCH OF PEOPLE ON THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE.
HE IS THE REASON THAT OBAMA HAS DEMOCRATIC SIDE.
HE IS THE REASON THAT OBAMA HAS A SECOND TERM.
HE IS THE REASON THAT OBAMA HAS A SECOND TERM.
SO HE HAS A FRE CACHE.
A SECOND TERM.
SO HE HAS A FRE CACHE.
THE TWO OF THEM HAVE NOT BEEN AS SO HE HAS A FRE CACHE.
THE TWO OF THEM HAVE NOT BEEN AS POPULAR.
THE TWO OF THEM HAVE NOT BEEN AS POPULAR.
-- ET, IT CAN GO DOWN POPULAR.
-- ET, IT CAN GO DOWN >> THE QUESTION THEN ARE WHETHER -- ET, IT CAN GO DOWN >> THE QUESTION THEN ARE WHETHER THEY'RE WORKING AS HARD AS THE >> THE QUESTION THEN ARE WHETHER THEY'RE WORKING AS HARD AS THE DEMOCRATS.
THEY'RE WORKING AS HARD AS THE DEMOCRATS.
THANK YOU AMY FOR LETTING ME DEMOCRATS.
THANK YOU AMY FOR LETTING ME BREAK MY PROMISE THE MY VIEWERS.
THANK YOU AMY FOR LETTING ME BREAK MY PROMISE THE MY VIEWERS.
>> YOU'RE THINKING WELL BOY, BREAK MY PROMISE THE MY VIEWERS.
>> YOU'RE THINKING WELL BOY, THAT WENT FAST.
>> YOU'RE THINKING WELL BOY, THAT WENT FAST.
WE'RE LAUNCHING A BRAND-NEW THAT WENT FAST.
WE'RE LAUNCHING A BRAND-NEW FEATURE TONIGHT.
WE'RE LAUNCHING A BRAND-NEW FEATURE TONIGHT.
AS ALWAYS THE CONVERSATION WILL FEATURE TONIGHT.
AS ALWAYS THE CONVERSATION WILL CONTINUE ON OUR "WASHINGTON AS ALWAYS THE CONVERSATION WILL CONTINUE ON OUR "WASHINGTON WEEK" EXTRA.
CONTINUE ON OUR "WASHINGTON WEEK" EXTRA.
YOU'LL BE ABLE TO WATCH IT WEEK" EXTRA.
YOU'LL BE ABLE TO WATCH IT IVE-ON BY USTREAM.
YOU'LL BE ABLE TO WATCH IT IVE-ON BY USTREAM.
YOU CAN WATCH US AT 8:00, 8:30 IVE-ON BY USTREAM.
YOU CAN WATCH US AT 8:00, 8:30 EASTERN TIME.
YOU CAN WATCH US AT 8:00, 8:30 EASTERN TIME.
RIGHT -- WE'LL SEE YOU NEXT WEEK EASTERN TIME.
RIGHT -- WE'LL SEE YOU NEXT WEEK RIGHT HERE ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
RIGHT -- WE'LL SEE YOU NEXT WEEK RIGHT HERE ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
GOOD NIGHT.
- News and Public Affairs
Top journalists deliver compelling original analysis of the hour's headlines.
- News and Public Affairs
FRONTLINE is investigative journalism that questions, explains and changes our world.
Support for PBS provided by:
Major funding for “Washington Week with The Atlantic” is provided by Consumer Cellular, Otsuka, Kaiser Permanente, the Yuen Foundation, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.