Obama Administration on Egypt, Syria & NSA Surveillance
Special | 25m 26sVideo has Closed Captions
US influence in Egypt; chemical weapon use in Syria;NSA collects US emails; March on Washi
US economic and military aid to Egypt in question as Mubarak is released from prison; allegations of chemical weapons use by the Syrian government; the NSA illegally collected thousands of US emails; and a March on Washington retrospective fifty years later. Joining Gwen: Alexis Simendinger of Real Clear Politics, Tom Gjelten of NPR and Michael Fletcher of the Washington Post.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Major funding for “Washington Week with The Atlantic” is provided by Consumer Cellular, Otsuka, Kaiser Permanente, the Yuen Foundation, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Obama Administration on Egypt, Syria & NSA Surveillance
Special | 25m 26sVideo has Closed Captions
US economic and military aid to Egypt in question as Mubarak is released from prison; allegations of chemical weapons use by the Syrian government; the NSA illegally collected thousands of US emails; and a March on Washington retrospective fifty years later. Joining Gwen: Alexis Simendinger of Real Clear Politics, Tom Gjelten of NPR and Michael Fletcher of the Washington Post.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
How to Watch Washington Week with The Atlantic
Washington Week with The Atlantic is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.
Buy Now
10 big stories Washington Week covered
Washington Week came on the air February 23, 1967. In the 50 years that followed, we covered a lot of history-making events. Read up on 10 of the biggest stories Washington Week covered in its first 50 years.Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorshipGWEN: RIOTS IN EGYPT, EVIDENCE IN SYRIA AND OF SPYING AT HOME.
EVIDENCE IN SYRIA AND OF SPYING AT HOME.
WE LOOK BACK AT THE MARCH IN OF SPYING AT HOME.
WE LOOK BACK AT THE MARCH IN WASHINGTON, TONIGHT ON WE LOOK BACK AT THE MARCH IN WASHINGTON, TONIGHT ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
WASHINGTON, TONIGHT ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."
MORE RED LINES CROSSED IN SYRIA.
"WASHINGTON WEEK."
MORE RED LINES CROSSED IN SYRIA.
>> WHAT WE'VE SEEN INDICATES MORE RED LINES CROSSED IN SYRIA.
>> WHAT WE'VE SEEN INDICATES BIG EVENTIS CLEARLY A >> WHAT WE'VE SEEN INDICATES BIG EVENTIS CLEARLY A OF GRAVE CONCERN.
BIG EVENTIS CLEARLY A OF GRAVE CONCERN.
WHEN YOU START SEEING CHEMICAL OF GRAVE CONCERN.
WHEN YOU START SEEING CHEMICAL WEAPONS USED ON A LARGE SCALE WHEN YOU START SEEING CHEMICAL WEAPONS USED ON A LARGE SCALE AND, AGAIN, WE'RE STILL WEAPONS USED ON A LARGE SCALE AND, AGAIN, WE'RE STILL GATHERING OUR INFORMATION ABOUT AND, AGAIN, WE'RE STILL GATHERING OUR INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR EVENT, BUT IT IS GATHERING OUR INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR EVENT, BUT IT IS VERY TROUBLESOME.
THIS PARTICULAR EVENT, BUT IT IS VERY TROUBLESOME.
>> THERE'S NO REASON, IF THERE'S VERY TROUBLESOME.
>> THERE'S NO REASON, IF THERE'S HIDE, FOR THE REGIME >> THERE'S NO REASON, IF THERE'S HIDE, FOR THE REGIME NOT TO LET THE INVESTIGATIVE HIDE, FOR THE REGIME NOT TO LET THE INVESTIGATIVE TEAM IN.
NOT TO LET THE INVESTIGATIVE TEAM IN.
GWEN: MORE TOUGH CHOICES IN TEAM IN.
GWEN: MORE TOUGH CHOICES IN EGYPT.
GWEN: MORE TOUGH CHOICES IN EGYPT.
>> WHAT WE'RE DOING RIGHT NOW IS EGYPT.
>> WHAT WE'RE DOING RIGHT NOW IS THEG A FULL EVALUATION OF >> WHAT WE'RE DOING RIGHT NOW IS THEG A FULL EVALUATION OF U.S.-EGYPTIAN RELATIONSHIP.
THEG A FULL EVALUATION OF U.S.-EGYPTIAN RELATIONSHIP.
>> WE HAVE THE SAME OBJECTIVE.
U.S.-EGYPTIAN RELATIONSHIP.
>> WE HAVE THE SAME OBJECTIVE.
TO SEE A DEMOCRATIC >> WE HAVE THE SAME OBJECTIVE.
TO SEE A DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM IN PLACE IN EGYPT.
TO SEE A DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM IN PLACE IN EGYPT.
IT AHN MCCAIN AND I CALLED SYSTEM IN PLACE IN EGYPT.
IT AHN MCCAIN AND I CALLED COUP BECAUSE THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IT AHN MCCAIN AND I CALLED COUP BECAUSE THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IT IS.
COUP BECAUSE THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IT IS.
GWEN: AND NEW DISCLOSURES ABTOU IT IS.
GWEN: AND NEW DISCLOSURES ABTOU OFERNMENT SURVEILLANCE GWEN: AND NEW DISCLOSURES ABTOU OFERNMENT SURVEILLANCE AMERICAN CITIZENS.
OFERNMENT SURVEILLANCE AMERICAN CITIZENS.
>> I THINK THAT THE TRUST OF THE AMERICAN CITIZENS.
>> I THINK THAT THE TRUST OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THEIR >> I THINK THAT THE TRUST OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THEIR AT STAKET IS WHAT'S AMERICAN PEOPLE IN THEIR AT STAKET IS WHAT'S HERE.
AT STAKET IS WHAT'S HERE.
GWEN: A TRIO OF LATE SUMMER HERE.
GWEN: A TRIO OF LATE SUMMER DILEMMAS, PLUS -- 50 YEAR GWEN: A TRIO OF LATE SUMMER DILEMMAS, PLUS -- 50 YEAR LATER, WE LOOK BACK AT THE MARCH DILEMMAS, PLUS -- 50 YEAR LATER, WE LOOK BACK AT THE MARCH MAY HAVE CHANGED AMERICA.
LATER, WE LOOK BACK AT THE MARCH MAY HAVE CHANGED AMERICA.
GJELTEN THE WEEK, TOM MAY HAVE CHANGED AMERICA.
GJELTEN THE WEEK, TOM OF NPR, ALEXIS SIMENDINGER OF GJELTEN THE WEEK, TOM OF NPR, ALEXIS SIMENDINGER OF REAL CLEAR POLITICS AND MICHAEL OF NPR, ALEXIS SIMENDINGER OF REAL CLEAR POLITICS AND MICHAEL FLETCHER OF "THE WASHINGTON REAL CLEAR POLITICS AND MICHAEL FLETCHER OF "THE WASHINGTON POST."
FLETCHER OF "THE WASHINGTON POST."
>> AWARD-WINNING REPORTING AND POST."
>> AWARD-WINNING REPORTING AND ANALYSIS, AS IT >> AWARD-WINNING REPORTING AND ANALYSIS, AS IT NSPPE.
ANALYSIS, AS IT NSPPE.
OUR NATION'S CAPITAL, NSPPE.
OUR NATION'S CAPITAL, WITHIS "WASHINGTON WEEK" OUR NATION'S CAPITAL, WITHIS "WASHINGTON WEEK" GWEN IFILL.
AGAIN, LIVE FROM WASHINGTON, MODERATOR GWEN IFILL.
WASHINGTON, MODERATOR GWEN IFILL.
GWEN: THIS WEEK PROVED AGAIN WHY IFILL.
GWEN: THIS WEEK PROVED AGAIN WHY NOTHING IS SIMPLE.
GWEN: THIS WEEK PROVED AGAIN WHY NOTHING IS SIMPLE.
THE TERRIBLEOUT NOTHING IS SIMPLE.
THE TERRIBLEOUT PICTURES OF APPARENT CHEMICAL THE TERRIBLEOUT PICTURES OF APPARENT CHEMICAL ATTACKS IN SYRIA.
PICTURES OF APPARENT CHEMICAL ATTACKS IN SYRIA.
TAKE WITH THE ATTACKS IN SYRIA.
TAKE WITH THE NATION, A LONG-TIME ALLY THAT TAKE WITH THE NATION, A LONG-TIME ALLY THAT A DEMOCRATTICALLY NATION, A LONG-TIME ALLY THAT A DEMOCRATTICALLY ELECTED LEADER IN FAVOR OF A A DEMOCRATTICALLY ELECTED LEADER IN FAVOR OF A AND WHO GOVERNMENT ELECTED LEADER IN FAVOR OF A AND WHO GOVERNMENT SHOULD AMERICANS TRUST WHEN THE AND WHO GOVERNMENT SHOULD AMERICANS TRUST WHEN THE PEOPLE WE PAY TO PROTECT US SHOULD AMERICANS TRUST WHEN THE PEOPLE WE PAY TO PROTECT US BEGIN SPYING ON US.
PEOPLE WE PAY TO PROTECT US BEGIN SPYING ON US.
IN A CNN INTERVIEW TODAY, THE BEGIN SPYING ON US.
IN A CNN INTERVIEW TODAY, THE PRESIDENT SPOKE TO THE CRITICS IN A CNN INTERVIEW TODAY, THE PRESIDENT SPOKE TO THE CRITICS AND.S.
INACTION IN SYRIA PRESIDENT SPOKE TO THE CRITICS AND.S.
INACTION IN SYRIA EGYPT.
AND.S.
INACTION IN SYRIA EGYPT.
>> WE REMAIN THE ONE EGYPT.
>> WE REMAIN THE ONE INDISPENSABLE NATION.
>> WE REMAIN THE ONE INDISPENSABLE NATION.
REASON WHY, WHEN YOU INDISPENSABLE NATION.
REASON WHY, WHEN YOU LISTEN TO WHAT'S HAPPENED AROUND REASON WHY, WHEN YOU LISTEN TO WHAT'S HAPPENED AROUND EVERYBODYSYRIA, THAT LISTEN TO WHAT'S HAPPENED AROUND EVERYBODYSYRIA, THAT ASKS WHAT THE U.S. IS DOING, EVERYBODYSYRIA, THAT ASKS WHAT THE U.S. IS DOING, IT'S BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES ASKS WHAT THE U.S. IS DOING, IT'S BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES ONE COUNTRY BE THE IT'S BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES ONE COUNTRY BE THE THAT PEOPLE EXPECT CAN DO MORE ONE COUNTRY BE THE THAT PEOPLE EXPECT CAN DO MORE SIMPLY PROTECT THEIR THAT PEOPLE EXPECT CAN DO MORE SIMPLY PROTECT THEIR BORDERS.
SIMPLY PROTECT THEIR BORDERS.
GWEN: BUT IN SYRIA, AT LEAST, BORDERS.
GWEN: BUT IN SYRIA, AT LEAST, MEANS TURNING TO THE GWEN: BUT IN SYRIA, AT LEAST, MEANS TURNING TO THE U.N. RATHER THAN THE U.S., MEANS TURNING TO THE U.N. RATHER THAN THE U.S., ALEXIS?
U.N. RATHER THAN THE U.S., ALEXIS?
>> THAT'S RIGHT.
ALEXIS?
>> THAT'S RIGHT.
WE HEARD FROM THE PRESIDENT >> THAT'S RIGHT.
WE HEARD FROM THE PRESIDENT TODAY IN THE INTERVIEW AND WE HEARD FROM THE PRESIDENT TODAY IN THE INTERVIEW AND CERTAINLY FROM THE WHITE HOUSE TODAY IN THE INTERVIEW AND CERTAINLY FROM THE WHITE HOUSE THIS WEEK WAS AN EFFORT TO TRY CERTAINLY FROM THE WHITE HOUSE THIS WEEK WAS AN EFFORT TO TRY TO THE UNITED NATIONS THIS WEEK WAS AN EFFORT TO TRY TO THE UNITED NATIONS AND UNITED STATES ALLIES ABROAD TO THE UNITED NATIONS AND UNITED STATES ALLIES ABROAD WORK ON BOTH THE AND UNITED STATES ALLIES ABROAD WORK ON BOTH THE INVESTIGATION OF WHAT HAPPENED WORK ON BOTH THE INVESTIGATION OF WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE ALLEGED CHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE ALLEGED CHEMICAL ATTACKS BUT ALSO TO TRY TO APPLY WITH THE ALLEGED CHEMICAL ATTACKS BUT ALSO TO TRY TO APPLY PRESSURE ON THE SITUATION ATTACKS BUT ALSO TO TRY TO APPLY PRESSURE ON THE SITUATION TO TRY TO ASSESS WHERE THINGS GO PRESSURE ON THE SITUATION TO TRY TO ASSESS WHERE THINGS GO FROM HERE.
TO TRY TO ASSESS WHERE THINGS GO FROM HERE.
THE WHITE HEARD AT FROM HERE.
THE WHITE HEARD AT HOUSE EARLIER THIS WEEK WAS, OH, THE WHITE HEARD AT HOUSE EARLIER THIS WEEK WAS, OH, LET'S TAKE A LONG PAUSE AND TRY HOUSE EARLIER THIS WEEK WAS, OH, LET'S TAKE A LONG PAUSE AND TRY THE FACTS AREWHAT LET'S TAKE A LONG PAUSE AND TRY THE FACTS AREWHAT ON THE GROUND AND LET THE U.N.
THE FACTS AREWHAT ON THE GROUND AND LET THE U.N.
INSPECTORS INVESTIGATE AND WHAT ON THE GROUND AND LET THE U.N.
INSPECTORS INVESTIGATE AND WHAT HEARD FROM THE PRESIDENT INSPECTORS INVESTIGATE AND WHAT HEARD FROM THE PRESIDENT TODAY, HE SAID ON THE INTERVIEW HEARD FROM THE PRESIDENT TODAY, HE SAID ON THE INTERVIEW THERE, HE DIDN'T THINK TODAY, HE SAID ON THE INTERVIEW THERE, HE DIDN'T THINK WOULD BE COOPERATION FROM THE THERE, HE DIDN'T THINK WOULD BE COOPERATION FROM THE ASSAD GOVERNMENT WHICH SUGGESTS WOULD BE COOPERATION FROM THE ASSAD GOVERNMENT WHICH SUGGESTS CONSIDERG TO HAVE TO ASSAD GOVERNMENT WHICH SUGGESTS CONSIDERG TO HAVE TO OTHER OPTIONS SIMULTANEOUSLY.
CONSIDERG TO HAVE TO OTHER OPTIONS SIMULTANEOUSLY.
WE KNOW THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER OPTIONS SIMULTANEOUSLY.
WE KNOW THERE HAVE BEEN MEETINGS, THERE WILL BE MORE WE KNOW THERE HAVE BEEN MEETINGS, THERE WILL BE MORE AT THE WHITE HOUSE.
MEETINGS, THERE WILL BE MORE AT THE WHITE HOUSE.
WE KNOW THE ADMINISTRATION HAS AT THE WHITE HOUSE.
WE KNOW THE ADMINISTRATION HAS OPTIONS IT IS CONSIDERING, IT WE KNOW THE ADMINISTRATION HAS OPTIONS IT IS CONSIDERING, IT CONSIDERING, ABOUT OPTIONS IT IS CONSIDERING, IT CONSIDERING, ABOUT WHAT -- HOW TO PROCEED BUT THE CONSIDERING, ABOUT WHAT -- HOW TO PROCEED BUT THE VERYDENT SEEMS TO BE WHAT -- HOW TO PROCEED BUT THE VERYDENT SEEMS TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT NOT ONLY THE VERYDENT SEEMS TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT NOT ONLY THE U.S. PRESSURE TO LEAD BUT ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT NOT ONLY THE U.S. PRESSURE TO LEAD BUT ALSO PUBLIC'S DESIRE NOT U.S. PRESSURE TO LEAD BUT ALSO PUBLIC'S DESIRE NOT TO LEAD.
PUBLIC'S DESIRE NOT TO LEAD.
GWEN: TELL ME ABOUT THIS RED TO LEAD.
GWEN: TELL ME ABOUT THIS RED ISSUE, TOM, BECAUSE WE -- GWEN: TELL ME ABOUT THIS RED ISSUE, TOM, BECAUSE WE -- THE PRESIDENT IS THE ONE WHO ISSUE, TOM, BECAUSE WE -- THE PRESIDENT IS THE ONE WHO "RED LINE" AND THE PRESIDENT IS THE ONE WHO "RED LINE" AND SEEMS TO BE BACK PEDALING EVER "RED LINE" AND SEEMS TO BE BACK PEDALING EVER SINCE.
SEEMS TO BE BACK PEDALING EVER SINCE.
WHAT IS THE LINE THE SINCE.
WHAT IS THE LINE THE ADMINISTRATION IS WAITING?
WHAT IS THE LINE THE ADMINISTRATION IS WAITING?
STATE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION IS WAITING?
STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESWOMAN WHO WE HEARD FROM STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESWOMAN WHO WE HEARD FROM EARLIER WAS ASKED ABOUT THIS SPOKESWOMAN WHO WE HEARD FROM EARLIER WAS ASKED ABOUT THIS SAID THE RED SHE EARLIER WAS ASKED ABOUT THIS SAID THE RED SHE LINE WAS ALREADY CROSSED SOME SAID THE RED SHE LINE WAS ALREADY CROSSED SOME TIME AGO AND WE TOOK ACTION, LINE WAS ALREADY CROSSED SOME TIME AGO AND WE TOOK ACTION, QUESTION, NOW,E TIME AGO AND WE TOOK ACTION, QUESTION, NOW,E WHAT WAS THE RACTION -- ACTION QUESTION, NOW,E WHAT WAS THE RACTION -- ACTION THAT WE TOOK?
WHAT WAS THE RACTION -- ACTION THAT WE TOOK?
TALK OF PROVIDING MORE THAT WE TOOK?
TALK OF PROVIDING MORE SUPPLIES, NOT EVEN ARMS, MORE TALK OF PROVIDING MORE SUPPLIES, NOT EVEN ARMS, MORE FORCES SOO THE REBEL SUPPLIES, NOT EVEN ARMS, MORE FORCES SOO THE REBEL CLEARLY THE ADMINISTRATION HAS FORCES SOO THE REBEL CLEARLY THE ADMINISTRATION HAS WALKED WAY BACK FROM THAT IDEA CLEARLY THE ADMINISTRATION HAS WALKED WAY BACK FROM THAT IDEA THAT THERE WAS GOING TO BE WALKED WAY BACK FROM THAT IDEA THAT THERE WAS GOING TO BE SOMETHING DRAMATIC.
THAT THERE WAS GOING TO BE SOMETHING DRAMATIC.
WHAT PRESIDENT OBAMA ORIGINALLY SOMETHING DRAMATIC.
WHAT PRESIDENT OBAMA ORIGINALLY SAID WOULD CHANGE THE CALCULUS WHAT PRESIDENT OBAMA ORIGINALLY SAID WOULD CHANGE THE CALCULUS OF WHAT WE DO BUT WHAT HE SAID SAID WOULD CHANGE THE CALCULUS OF WHAT WE DO BUT WHAT HE SAID A LEGAL THAT WITHOUT OF WHAT WE DO BUT WHAT HE SAID A LEGAL THAT WITHOUT MANDATE TO GO INTO SYRIA, IT A LEGAL THAT WITHOUT MANDATE TO GO INTO SYRIA, IT WOULD BE VERY HARD TO DO IT.
MANDATE TO GO INTO SYRIA, IT WOULD BE VERY HARD TO DO IT.
IF HE'S GOING TO USE THAT AS THE WOULD BE VERY HARD TO DO IT.
IF HE'S GOING TO USE THAT AS THE CRITERIA FOR INTERVENTION IN IF HE'S GOING TO USE THAT AS THE CRITERIA FOR INTERVENTION IN SYRIA, IT'S NEVER GOING TO CRITERIA FOR INTERVENTION IN SYRIA, IT'S NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN.
SYRIA, IT'S NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN.
GWEN: IF A LEGAL MANDATE, WE HAPPEN.
GWEN: IF A LEGAL MANDATE, WE ASSUME IS THE UNITED NATIONS.
GWEN: IF A LEGAL MANDATE, WE ASSUME IS THE UNITED NATIONS.
>> THAT'S WHAT HE'S TALKING ASSUME IS THE UNITED NATIONS.
>> THAT'S WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT ABOUT.
>> THAT'S WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT ABOUT.
GWEN: ARE WE TALKING ABOUT A ABOUT ABOUT.
GWEN: ARE WE TALKING ABOUT A RESOLUTION?
GWEN: ARE WE TALKING ABOUT A RESOLUTION?
ARE WE TALKING ABOUT JOINT -- I RESOLUTION?
ARE WE TALKING ABOUT JOINT -- I DON'T -- MAYBE THAT'S THE ARE WE TALKING ABOUT JOINT -- I DON'T -- MAYBE THAT'S THE PROBLEM.
DON'T -- MAYBE THAT'S THE PROBLEM.
>> THE PRESIDENT WAS SUGGESTING PROBLEM.
>> THE PRESIDENT WAS SUGGESTING THAT BASED ON WHAT WE KNOW FROM >> THE PRESIDENT WAS SUGGESTING THAT BASED ON WHAT WE KNOW FROM DONEHE UNITED STATES HAS THAT BASED ON WHAT WE KNOW FROM DONEHE UNITED STATES HAS THIS IN THE PAST, MOST DONEHE UNITED STATES HAS THIS IN THE PAST, MOST PROMINENTLY DEALING WITH IRAQ, THIS IN THE PAST, MOST PROMINENTLY DEALING WITH IRAQ, NOT A MEMORY WE ENJOY, THAT PROMINENTLY DEALING WITH IRAQ, NOT A MEMORY WE ENJOY, THAT THERE'S A DISCUSSION OF HAVING NOT A MEMORY WE ENJOY, THAT THERE'S A DISCUSSION OF HAVING THE PROVEABLE EVIDENCE OF THERE'S A DISCUSSION OF HAVING THE PROVEABLE EVIDENCE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THE PROVEABLE EVIDENCE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ASSAD'S USED AGAINST WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ASSAD'S USED AGAINST OWN PEOPLE, THE SYRIAN PEOPLE.
ASSAD'S USED AGAINST OWN PEOPLE, THE SYRIAN PEOPLE.
WITH THAT EVIDENCE, WITH SOME OWN PEOPLE, THE SYRIAN PEOPLE.
WITH THAT EVIDENCE, WITH SOME SORT OF INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION WITH THAT EVIDENCE, WITH SOME SORT OF INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THAT, THEN THE PRESIDENT'S SORT OF INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF THAT, THEN THE PRESIDENT'S THEESTING THAT PROVIDES OF THAT, THEN THE PRESIDENT'S THEESTING THAT PROVIDES BASIS TO GO TO THE U.N. TO SEEK THEESTING THAT PROVIDES BASIS TO GO TO THE U.N. TO SEEK FORCET EFFORT TO TRY TO BASIS TO GO TO THE U.N. TO SEEK FORCET EFFORT TO TRY TO ASSAD TO DO SOMETHING.
FORCET EFFORT TO TRY TO ASSAD TO DO SOMETHING.
AS TOM SUGGESTS, THAT'S A VERY ASSAD TO DO SOMETHING.
AS TOM SUGGESTS, THAT'S A VERY WHAT WE'VES AND AS TOM SUGGESTS, THAT'S A VERY WHAT WE'VES AND LEARNED IS, IF THE PRESIDENT WHAT WE'VES AND LEARNED IS, IF THE PRESIDENT WANTED TO USE INTERIM MILITARY LEARNED IS, IF THE PRESIDENT WANTED TO USE INTERIM MILITARY ABOUTS, YOU WOULD THINK WANTED TO USE INTERIM MILITARY ABOUTS, YOU WOULD THINK REMOVING THE U.N.
INSPECTORS WHO ABOUTS, YOU WOULD THINK REMOVING THE U.N.
INSPECTORS WHO ARE ALREADY ON THE GROUND TRYING REMOVING THE U.N.
INSPECTORS WHO ARE ALREADY ON THE GROUND TRYING TO GET ACCESS TO WHAT IS ARE ALREADY ON THE GROUND TRYING TO GET ACCESS TO WHAT IS CONSIDERED A BATTLEFIELD.
TO GET ACCESS TO WHAT IS CONSIDERED A BATTLEFIELD.
YOU WOULD WANT TO REMOVE THOSE CONSIDERED A BATTLEFIELD.
YOU WOULD WANT TO REMOVE THOSE THEN YOU WOULD BE YOU WOULD WANT TO REMOVE THOSE THEN YOU WOULD BE UNDERCOVERING YOUR EFFORT TO GET THEN YOU WOULD BE UNDERCOVERING YOUR EFFORT TO GET THAT INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE.
UNDERCOVERING YOUR EFFORT TO GET THAT INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE.
GWEN: ONE OF THE THINGS THE THAT INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE.
GWEN: ONE OF THE THINGS THE IS THE IDEAID TODAY GWEN: ONE OF THE THINGS THE IS THE IDEAID TODAY THAT THE U.S. CAN SAIL TO THE IS THE IDEAID TODAY THAT THE U.S. CAN SAIL TO THE RESCUE IS OVERSTATED.
THAT THE U.S. CAN SAIL TO THE RESCUE IS OVERSTATED.
THAT?RIGHT ABOUT RESCUE IS OVERSTATED.
THAT?RIGHT ABOUT >> WELL, I THINK -- I THINK -- THAT?RIGHT ABOUT >> WELL, I THINK -- I THINK -- HE HASU CONSIDER THAT >> WELL, I THINK -- I THINK -- HE HASU CONSIDER THAT ALREADY DEFINITIVELY RULED OUT HE HASU CONSIDER THAT ALREADY DEFINITIVELY RULED OUT BOOTS ON THE GROUND, EVEN IF YOU ALREADY DEFINITIVELY RULED OUT BOOTS ON THE GROUND, EVEN IF YOU SOME KIND OF MANDATE OR BOOTS ON THE GROUND, EVEN IF YOU SOME KIND OF MANDATE OR LEGAL FOUNDATION TO DO SOME KIND OF MANDATE OR LEGAL FOUNDATION TO DO SOMETHING, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT LEGAL FOUNDATION TO DO SOMETHING, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT MISSILE STRIKES, AIR SOMETHING, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT MISSILE STRIKES, AIR RAIDS, THAT'S NOT GOING TO DO MISSILE STRIKES, AIR RAIDS, THAT'S NOT GOING TO DO IT.
RAIDS, THAT'S NOT GOING TO DO IT.
THE UNITED STATES IS NOT REALLY IT.
THE UNITED STATES IS NOT REALLY IN A POSITION -- PARTICULARLY THE UNITED STATES IS NOT REALLY IN A POSITION -- PARTICULARLY THE YOU THINK ABOUT IN A POSITION -- PARTICULARLY THE YOU THINK ABOUT RELUCTANCE OF THE MILITARY -- TO THE YOU THINK ABOUT RELUCTANCE OF THE MILITARY -- TO MAKE A MAJOR DIFFERENCE ON THE RELUCTANCE OF THE MILITARY -- TO MAKE A MAJOR DIFFERENCE ON THE GROUND IN TERMS OF THE OUTCOME MAKE A MAJOR DIFFERENCE ON THE GROUND IN TERMS OF THE OUTCOME THIS CONFLICT.
GROUND IN TERMS OF THE OUTCOME THIS CONFLICT.
GWEN: LET ME READ TO A TWEET THIS CONFLICT.
GWEN: LET ME READ TO A TWEET THAT AMBASSADOR RICE, THE GWEN: LET ME READ TO A TWEET THAT AMBASSADOR RICE, THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER, SUSAN THAT AMBASSADOR RICE, THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER, SUSAN RICE, SENT OUT THIS AFTERNOON.
NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER, SUSAN RICE, SENT OUT THIS AFTERNOON.
DID FORED IT OR SOMEONE RICE, SENT OUT THIS AFTERNOON.
DID FORED IT OR SOMEONE HER, "WHAT IS ASSAD HIDING," DID FORED IT OR SOMEONE HER, "WHAT IS ASSAD HIDING," TALKING ABOUT BASHAR AL-ASSAD, HER, "WHAT IS ASSAD HIDING," TALKING ABOUT BASHAR AL-ASSAD, ANE WORLD DEMANDS TALKING ABOUT BASHAR AL-ASSAD, ANE WORLD DEMANDS INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE ANE WORLD DEMANDS INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE C.W.
IMMEDIATELY."
INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF THE C.W.
IMMEDIATELY."
IS THAT WHAT WE'RE REDUCED TO, C.W.
IMMEDIATELY."
IS THAT WHAT WE'RE REDUCED TO, THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER IS THAT WHAT WE'RE REDUCED TO, THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER OUR DISPLEASURE?
THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER OUR DISPLEASURE?
>> THE ONE PROMISING DEVELOPMENT OUR DISPLEASURE?
>> THE ONE PROMISING DEVELOPMENT IS THAT RUSSIA IS NOW SORT OF >> THE ONE PROMISING DEVELOPMENT IS THAT RUSSIA IS NOW SORT OF ENDORSING THE CALL FOR THE U.N. IS THAT RUSSIA IS NOW SORT OF ENDORSING THE CALL FOR THE U.N. ACTUALLY HAVETO ENDORSING THE CALL FOR THE U.N. ACTUALLY HAVETO ACCESS TO THE CHEMICAL WEAPON ACTUALLY HAVETO ACCESS TO THE CHEMICAL WEAPON ATTACK SITES AND THEY ARE ACCESS TO THE CHEMICAL WEAPON ATTACK SITES AND THEY ARE PUTTING SOME PRESSURE ON THE ATTACK SITES AND THEY ARE PUTTING SOME PRESSURE ON THE SYRIAN GOVERNMENT SO CLEARLY THE PUTTING SOME PRESSURE ON THE SYRIAN GOVERNMENT SO CLEARLY THE ADMINISTRATION IS HOPING THAT SYRIAN GOVERNMENT SO CLEARLY THE ADMINISTRATION IS HOPING THAT TOUGH TALK LIKE THIS WITH A ADMINISTRATION IS HOPING THAT TOUGH TALK LIKE THIS WITH A OF HELP FROM RUSSIA TOUGH TALK LIKE THIS WITH A OF HELP FROM RUSSIA MIGHT ACTUALLY MOVE THAT OF HELP FROM RUSSIA MIGHT ACTUALLY MOVE THAT INVESTIGATION.
MIGHT ACTUALLY MOVE THAT INVESTIGATION.
GWEN: TOUGH TALK FROM THE NEW INVESTIGATION.
GWEN: TOUGH TALK FROM THE NEW U.N.
AMBASSADOR, SAMANTHA GWEN: TOUGH TALK FROM THE NEW U.N.
AMBASSADOR, SAMANTHA POWELL.
U.N.
AMBASSADOR, SAMANTHA POWELL.
THERE'S OBVIOUSLY TALK FROM POWELL.
THERE'S OBVIOUSLY TALK FROM THE U.N. SECRETARY GENERAL.
THERE'S OBVIOUSLY TALK FROM THE U.N. SECRETARY GENERAL.
THE PRESIDENT'S TRYING TO BUILD THE U.N. SECRETARY GENERAL.
THE PRESIDENT'S TRYING TO BUILD OF FOLKS WHO ARE THE PRESIDENT'S TRYING TO BUILD OF FOLKS WHO ARE WILLING TO PRESS AND WHAT TOM IS OF FOLKS WHO ARE WILLING TO PRESS AND WHAT TOM IS SUGGESTING ABOUT RUSSIA THAT'S WILLING TO PRESS AND WHAT TOM IS SUGGESTING ABOUT RUSSIA THAT'S RUSSIA IS, OF SUGGESTING ABOUT RUSSIA THAT'S RUSSIA IS, OF COURSE, AN ALLY OF ASSAD AND HIS RUSSIA IS, OF COURSE, AN ALLY OF ASSAD AND HIS SOIME AND AN ARMS SUPPLIER, COURSE, AN ALLY OF ASSAD AND HIS SOIME AND AN ARMS SUPPLIER, TO GET -- REMEMBER THIS SOIME AND AN ARMS SUPPLIER, TO GET -- REMEMBER THIS RELATIONSHIP THAT THE UNITED TO GET -- REMEMBER THIS RELATIONSHIP THAT THE UNITED ON ICEHAS PUT SORT OF RELATIONSHIP THAT THE UNITED ON ICEHAS PUT SORT OF FOR A WHILE WITH RUSSIA, AND TO ON ICEHAS PUT SORT OF FOR A WHILE WITH RUSSIA, AND TO RUSSIA TO JOININ FOR A WHILE WITH RUSSIA, AND TO RUSSIA TO JOININ THIS EFFORT, MIGHT BE PROFITABLE RUSSIA TO JOININ THIS EFFORT, MIGHT BE PROFITABLE YETOME WAYS THAT WE DON'T THIS EFFORT, MIGHT BE PROFITABLE YETOME WAYS THAT WE DON'T KNOW.
YETOME WAYS THAT WE DON'T KNOW.
GWEN: SYRIA WASN'T THE ONLY KNOW.
GWEN: SYRIA WASN'T THE ONLY AGENDA.
GWEN: SYRIA WASN'T THE ONLY AGENDA.
THERE WAS EGYPT, WHICH CONTINUES AGENDA.
THERE WAS EGYPT, WHICH CONTINUES TO UNRAVEL AND THE U.S.
THERE WAS EGYPT, WHICH CONTINUES TO UNRAVEL AND THE U.S. CONTINUES TO STRUGGLE OVER WHAT, TO UNRAVEL AND THE U.S. CONTINUES TO STRUGGLE OVER WHAT, IF ANYTHING, TO DO ABOUT THAT.
CONTINUES TO STRUGGLE OVER WHAT, IF ANYTHING, TO DO ABOUT THAT.
THE PRESIDENT'S CNN IF ANYTHING, TO DO ABOUT THAT.
THE PRESIDENT'S CNN INTERVIEW.
THE PRESIDENT'S CNN INTERVIEW.
EGYPT ISSE IS WITH INTERVIEW.
EGYPT ISSE IS WITH THAT THE AID ITSELF MAY NOT EGYPT ISSE IS WITH THAT THE AID ITSELF MAY NOT INTERIMWHAT THE THAT THE AID ITSELF MAY NOT INTERIMWHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES, BUT I THINK INTERIMWHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES, BUT I THINK SAY ISST AMERICANS WOULD GOVERNMENT DOES, BUT I THINK SAY ISST AMERICANS WOULD THAT WE HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL SAY ISST AMERICANS WOULD THAT WE HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT BEING SEEN AS AIDING AND THAT WE HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT BEING SEEN AS AIDING AND THAT WE THINKNS ABOUT BEING SEEN AS AIDING AND THAT WE THINKNS RUN CONTRARY TO OUR VALUES AND THAT WE THINKNS RUN CONTRARY TO OUR VALUES AND OUR IDEALS.
RUN CONTRARY TO OUR VALUES AND OUR IDEALS.
GWEN: THIS FROM JUDY WOODRUFF'S OUR IDEALS.
GWEN: THIS FROM JUDY WOODRUFF'S INTERVIEW THIS WEEK WITH EGYPT'S GWEN: THIS FROM JUDY WOODRUFF'S INTERVIEW THIS WEEK WITH EGYPT'S THE U.S., MOHAMED INTERVIEW THIS WEEK WITH EGYPT'S THE U.S., MOHAMED TAWFIK.
THE U.S., MOHAMED TAWFIK.
>> THE U.S. ASSISTANCE TO EGYPT TAWFIK.
>> THE U.S. ASSISTANCE TO EGYPT IS PART OF A STRATEGIC >> THE U.S. ASSISTANCE TO EGYPT IS PART OF A STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP THAT SERVES BOTH IS PART OF A STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP THAT SERVES BOTH COUNTRIES ENORMOUSLY.
PARTNERSHIP THAT SERVES BOTH COUNTRIES ENORMOUSLY.
SITUATION SON COUNTRIES ENORMOUSLY.
SITUATION SON BASICALLY WE WOULD LIKE IT TO SITUATION SON BASICALLY WE WOULD LIKE IT TO WIN-WIN TO BE A BASICALLY WE WOULD LIKE IT TO WIN-WIN TO BE A SITUATION, PARTICULARLY SINCE WE WIN-WIN TO BE A SITUATION, PARTICULARLY SINCE WE AGREE ON THE OBJECTIVE.
SITUATION, PARTICULARLY SINCE WE AGREE ON THE OBJECTIVE.
THE: DO WE KNOW WHAT AGREE ON THE OBJECTIVE.
THE: DO WE KNOW WHAT OBJECTIVES ARE ANYMORE, TOM?
THE: DO WE KNOW WHAT OBJECTIVES ARE ANYMORE, TOM?
HE'SACTUALLY THINK THAT OBJECTIVES ARE ANYMORE, TOM?
HE'SACTUALLY THINK THAT RIGHT, THAT THE UNITED STATES HE'SACTUALLY THINK THAT RIGHT, THAT THE UNITED STATES AND EGYPT SORT OF DO AGREE ON RIGHT, THAT THE UNITED STATES AND EGYPT SORT OF DO AGREE ON SOME THINGS.
AND EGYPT SORT OF DO AGREE ON SOME THINGS.
STATES HAS A VERY SOME THINGS.
STATES HAS A VERY CLEAR INTEREST IN EGYPT BEING -- STATES HAS A VERY CLEAR INTEREST IN EGYPT BEING -- BE COMMITTED TO CLEAR INTEREST IN EGYPT BEING -- BE COMMITTED TO THE CAMP DAVID ACCORDS TO BE COMMITTED TO THE CAMP DAVID ACCORDS TO CONTINUE TO BE COMMITTED TO THE THE CAMP DAVID ACCORDS TO CONTINUE TO BE COMMITTED TO THE OF SUEZ CANAL.
CONTINUE TO BE COMMITTED TO THE OF SUEZ CANAL.
THOSE ARE REALLY IMPORTANT OF SUEZ CANAL.
THOSE ARE REALLY IMPORTANT STRATEGIC INTERESTS AND IT'S THOSE ARE REALLY IMPORTANT STRATEGIC INTERESTS AND IT'S THATINLY MY IMPRESSION STRATEGIC INTERESTS AND IT'S THATINLY MY IMPRESSION THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WILLING THATINLY MY IMPRESSION THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WILLING TO BEND OVER BACKWARDS NOT TO THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WILLING TO BEND OVER BACKWARDS NOT TO BREAK THAT RELATIONSHIP.
TO BEND OVER BACKWARDS NOT TO BREAK THAT RELATIONSHIP.
YOU SEE THE GREAT RELUCTANCE OF BREAK THAT RELATIONSHIP.
YOU SEE THE GREAT RELUCTANCE OF CALL IT ASTRATION TO YOU SEE THE GREAT RELUCTANCE OF CALL IT ASTRATION TO COUP AND TO T OFCUF AID CALL IT ASTRATION TO COUP AND TO T OFCUF AID DEFINITIVELY.
COUP AND TO T OFCUF AID DEFINITIVELY.
GWEN: NOT CALL IT A COUP.
DEFINITIVELY.
GWEN: NOT CALL IT A COUP.
>> NOT CALL IT A COUP.
GWEN: NOT CALL IT A COUP.
>> NOT CALL IT A COUP.
THEY MAY CUT SOME PARTIAL AID >> NOT CALL IT A COUP.
THEY MAY CUT SOME PARTIAL AID SHIPMENTS IN ORDER TO SAY THEY MAY CUT SOME PARTIAL AID SHIPMENTS IN ORDER TO SAY THEY'VE DONE SOMETHING BUT IT'S SHIPMENTS IN ORDER TO SAY THEY'VE DONE SOMETHING BUT IT'S PRETTY CLEAR THAT DON'T WANT TO THEY'VE DONE SOMETHING BUT IT'S PRETTY CLEAR THAT DON'T WANT TO WITH EGYPT.
PRETTY CLEAR THAT DON'T WANT TO WITH EGYPT.
GWEN: THERE'S ALL THIS DANCING WITH EGYPT.
GWEN: THERE'S ALL THIS DANCING GOING ON AND THIS IS WHAT GWEN: THERE'S ALL THIS DANCING GOING ON AND THIS IS WHAT REALLY ALLICY IS GOING ON AND THIS IS WHAT REALLY ALLICY IS ABOUT BUT IT STILL STRIKES ME REALLY ALLICY IS ABOUT BUT IT STILL STRIKES ME THAT AT SOME POINT THE ABOUT BUT IT STILL STRIKES ME THAT AT SOME POINT THE OBJECTIVES THEY'VE AGREED ON IS THAT AT SOME POINT THE OBJECTIVES THEY'VE AGREED ON IS WHO SHOULD RUN EGYPT.
OBJECTIVES THEY'VE AGREED ON IS WHO SHOULD RUN EGYPT.
>> THE OBJECTIVES -- THAT'S WHO SHOULD RUN EGYPT.
>> THE OBJECTIVES -- THAT'S RIGHT.
>> THE OBJECTIVES -- THAT'S RIGHT.
SAYINGSIDENT HAS BEEN RIGHT.
SAYINGSIDENT HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY AND THE SAYINGSIDENT HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY AND THE ADMINISTRATION HAS SAID REPEATEDLY AND THE ADMINISTRATION HAS SAID THEATEDLY THAT THIS IS FOR ADMINISTRATION HAS SAID THEATEDLY THAT THIS IS FOR EGYPTIANS TO DECIDE.
THEATEDLY THAT THIS IS FOR EGYPTIANS TO DECIDE.
THIS IS AN EFFORT FOR DEMOCRACY EGYPTIANS TO DECIDE.
THIS IS AN EFFORT FOR DEMOCRACY AND THERE'S BEEN AN THIS IS AN EFFORT FOR DEMOCRACY AND THERE'S BEEN AN EFFORT TO USE RHETORIC TO ENJOIN AND THERE'S BEEN AN EFFORT TO USE RHETORIC TO ENJOIN TO INTERIM GOVERNMENT TO TRY EFFORT TO USE RHETORIC TO ENJOIN TO INTERIM GOVERNMENT TO TRY RESTORE PEACE.
TO INTERIM GOVERNMENT TO TRY RESTORE PEACE.
ONE OF THE THINGS THE PRESIDENT RESTORE PEACE.
ONE OF THE THINGS THE PRESIDENT HAS SAID TODAY THAT I THOUGHT ONE OF THE THINGS THE PRESIDENT HAS SAID TODAY THAT I THOUGHT HE INTERESTING ABOUT EGYPT, HAS SAID TODAY THAT I THOUGHT HE INTERESTING ABOUT EGYPT, TALKED ABOUT SYRIA AND OUR U.S.
HE INTERESTING ABOUT EGYPT, TALKED ABOUT SYRIA AND OUR U.S.
INTERESTS, HE TALKED ABOUT OUR TALKED ABOUT SYRIA AND OUR U.S.
INTERESTS, HE TALKED ABOUT OUR HE TALKEDINTERESTS, INTERESTS, HE TALKED ABOUT OUR HE TALKEDINTERESTS, ABOUT THEM IN A DIFFERENT WAY HE TALKEDINTERESTS, ABOUT THEM IN A DIFFERENT WAY WITH EGYPT BUT HE SAID THAT ABOUT THEM IN A DIFFERENT WAY WITH EGYPT BUT HE SAID THAT THERE IS NO WAY TO GO BACK TO WITH EGYPT BUT HE SAID THAT THERE IS NO WAY TO GO BACK TO AND AFTERINGS WERE THERE IS NO WAY TO GO BACK TO AND AFTERINGS WERE MOHAMMAD MORSI WAS OVERTHROWN AND AFTERINGS WERE MOHAMMAD MORSI WAS OVERTHROWN NOW BEEN DETAINED IN MOHAMMAD MORSI WAS OVERTHROWN NOW BEEN DETAINED IN PRISON WITHOUT ANY LEGAL NOW BEEN DETAINED IN PRISON WITHOUT ANY LEGAL AGAIN ANDE'S SAYING PRISON WITHOUT ANY LEGAL AGAIN ANDE'S SAYING AGAIN THAT THE RELATIONSHIP WILL AGAIN ANDE'S SAYING AGAIN THAT THE RELATIONSHIP WILL CHANGE BUT HE'S NOT SAYING HOW AGAIN THAT THE RELATIONSHIP WILL CHANGE BUT HE'S NOT SAYING HOW THIS REVIEW, HOW LONG THIS CHANGE BUT HE'S NOT SAYING HOW THIS REVIEW, HOW LONG THIS REVIEW OF THE U.S. ASSISTANCE THIS REVIEW, HOW LONG THIS REVIEW OF THE U.S. ASSISTANCE YOU CONTINUE TO RUN OUT AND REVIEW OF THE U.S. ASSISTANCE YOU CONTINUE TO RUN OUT AND KNOW AT THE WHITE HOUSE THERE YOU CONTINUE TO RUN OUT AND KNOW AT THE WHITE HOUSE THERE WAS ALL THIS EFFORT THIS WEEK TO KNOW AT THE WHITE HOUSE THERE WAS ALL THIS EFFORT THIS WEEK TO TALK ABOUT HOW THE U.S. WAS ALL THIS EFFORT THIS WEEK TO TALK ABOUT HOW THE U.S.
RELATIONSHIP IN TERMS OF TALK ABOUT HOW THE U.S.
RELATIONSHIP IN TERMS OF MILITARY AND OTHER AID IS NOT A RELATIONSHIP IN TERMS OF MILITARY AND OTHER AID IS NOT A SPIGOT.
MILITARY AND OTHER AID IS NOT A SPIGOT.
THE PRESIDENT KNOWS NOT ONLY IS SPIGOT.
THE PRESIDENT KNOWS NOT ONLY IS THIS LIKE A CREDIT CARD IN WHICH THE PRESIDENT KNOWS NOT ONLY IS THIS LIKE A CREDIT CARD IN WHICH BEEN BUYING TANKS AND THIS LIKE A CREDIT CARD IN WHICH BEEN BUYING TANKS AND THIS WILL ALSO AFFECT BEEN BUYING TANKS AND THIS WILL ALSO AFFECT THE U.S. ECONOMY.
THIS WILL ALSO AFFECT THE U.S. ECONOMY.
JOBS ARE PEOPLE WHOSE THE U.S. ECONOMY.
JOBS ARE PEOPLE WHOSE DEPEND ON SOME OF THESE TANKS JOBS ARE PEOPLE WHOSE DEPEND ON SOME OF THESE TANKS AND WEAPONS GOING FORWARD AND SO DEPEND ON SOME OF THESE TANKS AND WEAPONS GOING FORWARD AND SO PRESIDENT'S THINKING AND WEAPONS GOING FORWARD AND SO PRESIDENT'S THINKING ABOUT THE LONG-TERM INTERESTS.
PRESIDENT'S THINKING ABOUT THE LONG-TERM INTERESTS.
GWEN: HE USED THAT PHRASE.
ABOUT THE LONG-TERM INTERESTS.
GWEN: HE USED THAT PHRASE.
HE KEPT TALKING ABOUT THE GWEN: HE USED THAT PHRASE.
HE KEPT TALKING ABOUT THE LONG-TERM INTERESTS, U.S. AND HE KEPT TALKING ABOUT THE LONG-TERM INTERESTS, U.S. AND EGYPT.
LONG-TERM INTERESTS, U.S. AND EGYPT.
BUTE SAID WE WASN'T GO BACK EGYPT.
BUTE SAID WE WASN'T GO BACK THIS WEEK HOSNI MUBARAK WAS BUTE SAID WE WASN'T GO BACK THIS WEEK HOSNI MUBARAK WAS RELEASED FROM PRISON.
THIS WEEK HOSNI MUBARAK WAS RELEASED FROM PRISON.
CELEBRATIONS IN TAHRIR RELEASED FROM PRISON.
CELEBRATIONS IN TAHRIR WAS IMPRISONED.
CELEBRATIONS IN TAHRIR WAS IMPRISONED.
HE IS NO LONGER THE SYMBOL OF WAS IMPRISONED.
HE IS NO LONGER THE SYMBOL OF EGYPTIAN PEOPLE HE IS NO LONGER THE SYMBOL OF EGYPTIAN PEOPLE THE WAY HE WAS.
EGYPTIAN PEOPLE THE WAY HE WAS.
>> BECAUSE OF THEIR ECONOMY.
THE WAY HE WAS.
>> BECAUSE OF THEIR ECONOMY.
GWEN: SO THE SYMBOL IS THE >> BECAUSE OF THEIR ECONOMY.
GWEN: SO THE SYMBOL IS THE WHO REPLACED HIM.
GWEN: SO THE SYMBOL IS THE WHO REPLACED HIM.
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT AID AND WHO REPLACED HIM.
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT AID AND WHETHER IT'S A SPIGOT AND SHOULD WHEN WE TALK ABOUT AID AND WHETHER IT'S A SPIGOT AND SHOULD BE CUT OFF, IT'S NOT JUST THE WHETHER IT'S A SPIGOT AND SHOULD BE CUT OFF, IT'S NOT JUST THE U.S.
WHICH DOESN'T WANT U.S. AID BE CUT OFF, IT'S NOT JUST THE U.S.
WHICH DOESN'T WANT U.S. AID ALSO THE REGION.
U.S.
WHICH DOESN'T WANT U.S. AID ALSO THE REGION.
>> NOT ONLY THAT, GWEN, THE U.S. ALSO THE REGION.
>> NOT ONLY THAT, GWEN, THE U.S. AND SAUDIOFF AID >> NOT ONLY THAT, GWEN, THE U.S. AND SAUDIOFF AID ARABIA HAS ALREADY SAID IT WILL AND SAUDIOFF AID ARABIA HAS ALREADY SAID IT WILL MAKE UP FOR ANYTHING THE UNITED ARABIA HAS ALREADY SAID IT WILL MAKE UP FOR ANYTHING THE UNITED EUROPE CUT OFF TO MAKE UP FOR ANYTHING THE UNITED EUROPE CUT OFF TO EGYPT SO IF ALL THAT AID IS EUROPE CUT OFF TO EGYPT SO IF ALL THAT AID IS SIMPLY REPLACED BY SAUDI AID, EGYPT SO IF ALL THAT AID IS SIMPLY REPLACED BY SAUDI AID, WHAT'S BEEN ACCOMPLISHED?
SIMPLY REPLACED BY SAUDI AID, WHAT'S BEEN ACCOMPLISHED?
GWEN: THE NATIONAL SECURITY WHAT'S BEEN ACCOMPLISHED?
GWEN: THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL HAS BEEN MEETING ABOUT GWEN: THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL HAS BEEN MEETING ABOUT A DAILY BASIS,ON COUNCIL HAS BEEN MEETING ABOUT A DAILY BASIS,ON EVERY DAY THEY SAY THEY'RE A DAILY BASIS,ON EVERY DAY THEY SAY THEY'RE MEETING BUT THEY WON'T TELL US EVERY DAY THEY SAY THEY'RE MEETING BUT THEY WON'T TELL US WHAT HAPPENED.
MEETING BUT THEY WON'T TELL US WHAT HAPPENED.
DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT'S ON WHAT HAPPENED.
DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT'S ON THE TABLE?
DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT'S ON THE TABLE?
IS IE REVIEW PART OF IT THE TABLE?
IS IE REVIEW PART OF IT THINK GOING TO GO ON FOR A IS IE REVIEW PART OF IT THINK GOING TO GO ON FOR A CONTINUED PERIOD OF TIME.
THINK GOING TO GO ON FOR A CONTINUED PERIOD OF TIME.
THERE HAS BEEN NO INDICATION CONTINUED PERIOD OF TIME.
THERE HAS BEEN NO INDICATION THAT THEY WANT TO SAY THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO INDICATION THAT THEY WANT TO SAY THAT TO COME TO A THAT THEY WANT TO SAY THAT TO COME TO A CONCLUSION ABOUT THAT BUT THERE TO COME TO A CONCLUSION ABOUT THAT BUT THERE WAS VIGOROUS DISCUSSION ABOUT CONCLUSION ABOUT THAT BUT THERE WAS VIGOROUS DISCUSSION ABOUT U.S. REVIEW OF WAS VIGOROUS DISCUSSION ABOUT U.S. REVIEW OF ASSISTANCE OF AID BUT THE U.S. REVIEW OF ASSISTANCE OF AID BUT THE INSIDENT, I THINK, ASSISTANCE OF AID BUT THE INSIDENT, I THINK, RE-EMPHASIZING IN THE CNN INSIDENT, I THINK, RE-EMPHASIZING IN THE CNN INTERVIEW THAT HE'S TALKING RE-EMPHASIZING IN THE CNN INTERVIEW THAT HE'S TALKING INTERESTS, IG-TERM INTERVIEW THAT HE'S TALKING INTERESTS, IG-TERM THINK HE'S ALSO TALKING ABOUT INTERESTS, IG-TERM THINK HE'S ALSO TALKING ABOUT AMERICAN INTERESTS, TOO.
THINK HE'S ALSO TALKING ABOUT AMERICAN INTERESTS, TOO.
UNRESOLVED WERE ALSO AMERICAN INTERESTS, TOO.
UNRESOLVED WERE ALSO DEBATES THIS WEEK WITHIN OUR UNRESOLVED WERE ALSO DEBATES THIS WEEK WITHIN OUR BORDERS OVER SECRETS AND DEBATES THIS WEEK WITHIN OUR BORDERS OVER SECRETS AND SURVEILLANCE.
BORDERS OVER SECRETS AND SURVEILLANCE.
THE MILITARY COURT CONVICTED SURVEILLANCE.
THE MILITARY COURT CONVICTED BRADLEY MANNING FOR RELEASING THE MILITARY COURT CONVICTED BRADLEY MANNING FOR RELEASING CONTROL OF SECRET DOCUMENTS TO BRADLEY MANNING FOR RELEASING CONTROL OF SECRET DOCUMENTS TO LEAK AND THE PARTNER OF CONTROL OF SECRET DOCUMENTS TO LEAK AND THE PARTNER OF JOURNALIST GLENN LEAK AND THE PARTNER OF JOURNALIST GLENN SUSPENSIONAS HELD ON JOURNALIST GLENN SUSPENSIONAS HELD ON TO EDWARDONNECTED SUSPENSIONAS HELD ON TO EDWARDONNECTED SNOWDEN AND THE NATIONAL TO EDWARDONNECTED SNOWDEN AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL SAID IT MAY SNOWDEN AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL SAID IT MAY EMAILSEN CONNECTING SECURITY COUNCIL SAID IT MAY EMAILSEN CONNECTING AFTER ALL YET WE'RE TOLD THE EMAILSEN CONNECTING AFTER ALL YET WE'RE TOLD THE PRESIDENT IS CONFIDENT THIS IS AFTER ALL YET WE'RE TOLD THE PRESIDENT IS CONFIDENT THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL.
PRESIDENT IS CONFIDENT THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL.
SOONE REASON I THINK THEY'RE NOT A PROBLEM AT ALL.
SOONE REASON I THINK THEY'RE CONFIDENT IS BECAUSE IN SOONE REASON I THINK THEY'RE CONFIDENT IS BECAUSE IN CONGRESS, THE PEOPLE WHO KNOW CONFIDENT IS BECAUSE IN CONGRESS, THE PEOPLE WHO KNOW PROGRAM ONOUT THIS CONGRESS, THE PEOPLE WHO KNOW PROGRAM ONOUT THIS THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, BOTH PROGRAM ONOUT THIS THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS, HAVE THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS, HAVE PART BEEN SOLIDLY DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS, HAVE PART BEEN SOLIDLY IN SUPPORT OF IT, WITH A FEW PART BEEN SOLIDLY IN SUPPORT OF IT, WITH A FEW WHITING AND- RON IN SUPPORT OF IT, WITH A FEW WHITING AND- RON SENATOR UDALL -- BUT MOSTLY THIS WHITING AND- RON SENATOR UDALL -- BUT MOSTLY THIS ISSUE.A PARTISAN SENATOR UDALL -- BUT MOSTLY THIS ISSUE.A PARTISAN YOU SEE DEMOCRATS AND ISSUE.A PARTISAN YOU SEE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS ALIKE IN POSITIONS YOU SEE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS ALIKE IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY ENDORSING IT AND I REPUBLICANS ALIKE IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY ENDORSING IT AND I ISNK THE ADMINISTRATION OF AUTHORITY ENDORSING IT AND I ISNK THE ADMINISTRATION THINKING EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS A ISNK THE ADMINISTRATION THINKING EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS A THEE VOTE ON FUNDING FOR THINKING EVEN THOUGH THERE WAS A THEE VOTE ON FUNDING FOR SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM IN THE THEE VOTE ON FUNDING FOR SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM IN THE FUTURE, I THINK THE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM IN THE FUTURE, I THINK THE ADMINISTRATION IS THINKING ONCE FUTURE, I THINK THE ADMINISTRATION IS THINKING ONCE DUST SETTLES THIS PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION IS THINKING ONCE DUST SETTLES THIS PROGRAM WILL GO AHEAD AND THEY'LL HAVE DUST SETTLES THIS PROGRAM WILL GO AHEAD AND THEY'LL HAVE CONGRESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR IT.
WILL GO AHEAD AND THEY'LL HAVE CONGRESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR IT.
ABOUT ALLCURIOUS CONGRESSIONAL SUPPORT FOR IT.
ABOUT ALLCURIOUS THESE THINGS THAT LINKS THEM ABOUT ALLCURIOUS THESE THINGS THAT LINKS THEM TOGETHER IS CREDIBILITY FOR THE THESE THINGS THAT LINKS THEM TOGETHER IS CREDIBILITY FOR THE PRESIDENT.
TOGETHER IS CREDIBILITY FOR THE PRESIDENT.
ALEXIS, DO THEY WORRY ABOUT PRESIDENT.
ALEXIS, DO THEY WORRY ABOUT THAT?
ALEXIS, DO THEY WORRY ABOUT THAT?
>> ABSOLUTELY.
THAT?
>> ABSOLUTELY.
YOU COULD HEAR THE PRESIDENT IN >> ABSOLUTELY.
YOU COULD HEAR THE PRESIDENT IN A SERIES OF QUESTIONS, AGAIN AND YOU COULD HEAR THE PRESIDENT IN A SERIES OF QUESTIONS, AGAIN AND WHETHER IT WAS, A SERIES OF QUESTIONS, AGAIN AND WHETHER IT WAS, AT HIS NEWS CONFERENCE OR IN THE WHETHER IT WAS, AT HIS NEWS CONFERENCE OR IN THE CNN INTERVIEW, THE QUESTION IS AT HIS NEWS CONFERENCE OR IN THE CNN INTERVIEW, THE QUESTION IS ABOUT WHETHER HIS WORD IS HIS CNN INTERVIEW, THE QUESTION IS ABOUT WHETHER HIS WORD IS HIS DEED, WHETHER HE HAS MEASURED UP ABOUT WHETHER HIS WORD IS HIS DEED, WHETHER HE HAS MEASURED UP TO EXPECTATIONS, NOT ONLY THAT DEED, WHETHER HE HAS MEASURED UP TO EXPECTATIONS, NOT ONLY THAT HAD FOR HIM ON OR TO EXPECTATIONS, NOT ONLY THAT HAD FOR HIM ON OR ABROAD OR HIS OWN EXPECTATIONS HAD FOR HIM ON OR ABROAD OR HIS OWN EXPECTATIONS BEING HONESTE'S ABROAD OR HIS OWN EXPECTATIONS BEING HONESTE'S ABOUT WHAT IT IS THAT THE BEING HONESTE'S ABOUT WHAT IT IS THAT THE AMERICANS ARE LOOKING AT AND ABOUT WHAT IT IS THAT THE AMERICANS ARE LOOKING AT AND WITH, ABSOLUTELY.
AMERICANS ARE LOOKING AT AND WITH, ABSOLUTELY.
I THINK THAT THE CREDIBILITY AND WITH, ABSOLUTELY.
I THINK THAT THE CREDIBILITY AND GOVERNMENT MEANS TRUST I THINK THAT THE CREDIBILITY AND GOVERNMENT MEANS TRUST IN HIM.
GOVERNMENT MEANS TRUST IN HIM.
GWEN: THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE IN HIM.
GWEN: THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE HEARING, AS WELL.
GWEN: THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE HEARING, AS WELL.
IT AT THE BEGINNING, HEARING, AS WELL.
IT AT THE BEGINNING, GWEN.
IT AT THE BEGINNING, GWEN.
NO EASY ANSWERS.
GWEN.
NO EASY ANSWERS.
I THINK THAT THERE ACTUALLY IS NO EASY ANSWERS.
I THINK THAT THERE ACTUALLY IS SOME SYMPATHY FOR THE DIFFICULTY I THINK THAT THERE ACTUALLY IS SOME SYMPATHY FOR THE DIFFICULTY OF THE POSITIONS THAT THE UNITED SOME SYMPATHY FOR THE DIFFICULTY OF THE POSITIONS THAT THE UNITED WITH.
IS DEALING OF THE POSITIONS THAT THE UNITED WITH.
IS DEALING GWEN: THANKS TO BOTH OF YOU.
WITH.
IS DEALING GWEN: THANKS TO BOTH OF YOU.
WE END TONIGHT WITH A LOOK BACK GWEN: THANKS TO BOTH OF YOU.
WE END TONIGHT WITH A LOOK BACK AT OVER 50 YEARS AT THE HISTORIC WE END TONIGHT WITH A LOOK BACK AT OVER 50 YEARS AT THE HISTORIC MARCH ON WASHINGTON FOR JOBS AND AT OVER 50 YEARS AT THE HISTORIC MARCH ON WASHINGTON FOR JOBS AND FREEDOM.
MARCH ON WASHINGTON FOR JOBS AND FREEDOM.
A QUARTER MILLION PEOPLE OF ALL FREEDOM.
A QUARTER MILLION PEOPLE OF ALL COLORS, GENDERS AND AGES A QUARTER MILLION PEOPLE OF ALL COLORS, GENDERS AND AGES CAPITAL TO THE NATION'S COLORS, GENDERS AND AGES CAPITAL TO THE NATION'S ON AN AUGUST WEDNESDAY, 1963, TO CAPITAL TO THE NATION'S ON AN AUGUST WEDNESDAY, 1963, TO MARCH PEACEFULLY FOR CIVIL ON AN AUGUST WEDNESDAY, 1963, TO MARCH PEACEFULLY FOR CIVIL RIGHTS.
MARCH PEACEFULLY FOR CIVIL RIGHTS.
IT'S REMEMBERED AS THE MOMENT RIGHTS.
IT'S REMEMBERED AS THE MOMENT REVEREND MARTIN LUTHER IT'S REMEMBERED AS THE MOMENT REVEREND MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.
DELIVERED THE "I HAVE A REVEREND MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.
DELIVERED THE "I HAVE A DREAM" SPEECH.
KING JR.
DELIVERED THE "I HAVE A DREAM" SPEECH.
"WASHINGTON POST" REPORTER DREAM" SPEECH.
"WASHINGTON POST" REPORTER MICHAEL FLETCHER INTERVIEWED "WASHINGTON POST" REPORTER MICHAEL FLETCHER INTERVIEWED SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE MICHAEL FLETCHER INTERVIEWED SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE THERE.
SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE THERE.
WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT ELSE THERE.
WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT ELSE THAT DAY.
THEY CAME BY PLANE, TRAIN, AUTOMOBILE AND BY FOOT TO BE THE MARCH ON WASHINGTON, AUTOMOBILE AND BY FOOT TO BE THE MARCH ON WASHINGTON, AN ESTIMATED 250,000 PEOPLE THE MARCH ON WASHINGTON, AN ESTIMATED 250,000 PEOPLE CONVERGED ON THE LINCOLN AN ESTIMATED 250,000 PEOPLE CONVERGED ON THE LINCOLN MEMORIAL ON THAT HOT AUGUST DAY CONVERGED ON THE LINCOLN MEMORIAL ON THAT HOT AUGUST DAY 50 YEARS AGO THIS MONTH.
MEMORIAL ON THAT HOT AUGUST DAY 50 YEARS AGO THIS MONTH.
PEOPLE FORGET IT WAS 50 YEARS AGO THIS MONTH.
PEOPLE FORGET IT WAS REALLY HARD TO GET THATANY M PEOPLE FORGET IT WAS REALLY HARD TO GET THATANY M PEOPLE IN ONE PLACE 1963.
REALLY HARD TO GET THATANY M PEOPLE IN ONE PLACE 1963.
COME TOGETHER?CH PEOPLE IN ONE PLACE 1963.
COME TOGETHER?CH >> IT'S INTERESTING.
COME TOGETHER?CH >> IT'S INTERESTING.
THE IDEA FOR THE MARCH ACTUALLY >> IT'S INTERESTING.
THE IDEA FOR THE MARCH ACTUALLY YEARS BEFORETED 22 THE IDEA FOR THE MARCH ACTUALLY YEARS BEFORETED 22 IT OCCURRED, PHILLIP RANDOLPH, YEARS BEFORETED 22 IT OCCURRED, PHILLIP RANDOLPH, WANTEDOUS LABOR LEADER, IT OCCURRED, PHILLIP RANDOLPH, WANTEDOUS LABOR LEADER, TO HAVE A MARCH ON WASHINGTON AT WANTEDOUS LABOR LEADER, TO HAVE A MARCH ON WASHINGTON AT PROTESTE TO TO HAVE A MARCH ON WASHINGTON AT PROTESTE TO DISCRIMINATION IN THE WAR PROTESTE TO DISCRIMINATION IN THE WAR INDUSTRIES AND SEGREGATION IN DISCRIMINATION IN THE WAR INDUSTRIES AND SEGREGATION IN WASARMED FORCES BUT THAT INDUSTRIES AND SEGREGATION IN WASARMED FORCES BUT THAT THE WAR.R.
DESEGREGATED WASARMED FORCES BUT THAT THE WAR.R.
DESEGREGATED INDUSTRY BUT 22 YEARS LAR, ITEN THE WAR.R.
DESEGREGATED INDUSTRY BUT 22 YEARS LAR, ITEN ERE INDUSTRY BUT 22 YEARS LAR, ITEN ERE EDGAR MEVERS, HE FELT IT WAS ERE EDGAR MEVERS, HE FELT IT WAS TIME TO CONVERGE ON WASHINGTON EDGAR MEVERS, HE FELT IT WAS TIME TO CONVERGE ON WASHINGTON AND MAKE THIS DEMAND BUT IT WAS TIME TO CONVERGE ON WASHINGTON AND MAKE THIS DEMAND BUT IT WAS AUDACIOUS BECAUSE IN THOSE DAYS AND MAKE THIS DEMAND BUT IT WAS AUDACIOUS BECAUSE IN THOSE DAYS MASS MARCHES DIDN'T HAPPEN.
AUDACIOUS BECAUSE IN THOSE DAYS MASS MARCHES DIDN'T HAPPEN.
WASN'T USED AS A POLITICAL MASS MARCHES DIDN'T HAPPEN.
WASN'T USED AS A POLITICAL TOOL IN THIS COUNTRY.
WASN'T USED AS A POLITICAL TOOL IN THIS COUNTRY.
BIG, AUDACUSIO TOOL IN THIS COUNTRY.
BIG, AUDACUSIO IDEA AND IT WAS PULLED TOGETHER BIG, AUDACUSIO IDEA AND IT WAS PULLED TOGETHER IN EIGHT OR 10 WEEKS.
IDEA AND IT WAS PULLED TOGETHER IN EIGHT OR 10 WEEKS.
MENTIONED, A.YOU IN EIGHT OR 10 WEEKS.
MENTIONED, A.YOU PHILLIP RANDOLPH, AND ANOTHER MENTIONED, A.YOU PHILLIP RANDOLPH, AND ANOTHER YOU MENTIONED WAS BEHIND PHILLIP RANDOLPH, AND ANOTHER YOU MENTIONED WAS BEHIND THE ORGANIZATION.
YOU MENTIONED WAS BEHIND THE ORGANIZATION.
BYRON RUSTIN.
THE ORGANIZATION.
BYRON RUSTIN.
>> BACK IN 1963, THIS IS AN BYRON RUSTIN.
>> BACK IN 1963, THIS IS AN OPENLY GAY BLACK MAN AT THE >> BACK IN 1963, THIS IS AN OPENLY GAY BLACK MAN AT THE CENTER OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OPENLY GAY BLACK MAN AT THE CENTER OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT AND HE WAS ATTACKED, OF CENTER OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT AND HE WAS ATTACKED, OF COURSE, PEOPLE IN CONGRESS MOVEMENT AND HE WAS ATTACKED, OF COURSE, PEOPLE IN CONGRESS HIM, STROM THURMOND COURSE, PEOPLE IN CONGRESS HIM, STROM THURMOND TALKED ABOUT HIS LIFESTYLE IN A HIM, STROM THURMOND TALKED ABOUT HIS LIFESTYLE IN A UNDERMINE THE TALKED ABOUT HIS LIFESTYLE IN A UNDERMINE THE PLANNING FOR THE MARCH BUT IT UNDERMINE THE PLANNING FOR THE MARCH BUT IT BYRON RUSTEN WHO BROUGHT THE PLANNING FOR THE MARCH BUT IT BYRON RUSTEN WHO BROUGHT THE TOGETHER, GOT ALL THE BYRON RUSTEN WHO BROUGHT THE TOGETHER, GOT ALL THE WORD OUT.
TOGETHER, GOT ALL THE WORD OUT.
AND HE WAS ABLE TO ORGANIZE THE WORD OUT.
AND HE WAS ABLE TO ORGANIZE THE MARCH AND BRING PEOPLE TO AND HE WAS ABLE TO ORGANIZE THE MARCH AND BRING PEOPLE TO WASHINGTON AND NO ONE KNEW IT MARCH AND BRING PEOPLE TO WASHINGTON AND NO ONE KNEW IT WOULD END UP BEING A QUARTER WASHINGTON AND NO ONE KNEW IT WOULD END UP BEING A QUARTER PEOPLE.
WOULD END UP BEING A QUARTER PEOPLE.
YOU JUST HAD NO WAY OF KNOW THIS PEOPLE.
YOU JUST HAD NO WAY OF KNOW THIS KIND OF THING.
YOU JUST HAD NO WAY OF KNOW THIS KIND OF THING.
>> AND THE FACES IN THE CROWD, KIND OF THING.
>> AND THE FACES IN THE CROWD, NOT JUST BLACK >> AND THE FACES IN THE CROWD, NOT JUST BLACK FACES.
NOT JUST BLACK FACES.
IT WASN'T LIKE SOMEONE GOT UP IN FACES.
IT WASN'T LIKE SOMEONE GOT UP IN PULPITS AND SAID, IT WASN'T LIKE SOMEONE GOT UP IN PULPITS AND SAID, YOU GO TO WASHINGTON.
PULPITS AND SAID, YOU GO TO WASHINGTON.
I WAS STRUCK LOOKING AT THE YOU GO TO WASHINGTON.
I WAS STRUCK LOOKING AT THE INTEGRATED ITOW I WAS STRUCK LOOKING AT THE INTEGRATED ITOW WAS.
INTEGRATED ITOW WAS.
>> THAT WAS ONE OF THE GREAT WAS.
>> THAT WAS ONE OF THE GREAT TRIUMPHS OF THE MARCH.
>> THAT WAS ONE OF THE GREAT TRIUMPHS OF THE MARCH.
RIGHTSK OF THE CIVIL TRIUMPHS OF THE MARCH.
RIGHTSK OF THE CIVIL MOVEMENT, WE THINK ABOUT THE RIGHTSK OF THE CIVIL MOVEMENT, WE THINK ABOUT THE INEGRATED KIND OF MOVEMENT MOVEMENT, WE THINK ABOUT THE INEGRATED KIND OF MOVEMENT SOME WAYS BUT AT THAT TIME I INEGRATED KIND OF MOVEMENT SOME WAYS BUT AT THAT TIME I OFNK THERE WERE A LOT SOME WAYS BUT AT THAT TIME I OFNK THERE WERE A LOT QUESTIONS IN AMERICA ABOUT WHAT OFNK THERE WERE A LOT QUESTIONS IN AMERICA ABOUT WHAT IS THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT.
QUESTIONS IN AMERICA ABOUT WHAT IS THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT.
A FELT THREATENING AND LIKE IS THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT.
A FELT THREATENING AND LIKE BLACK SOUTHERN MOVEMENT AND THE A FELT THREATENING AND LIKE BLACK SOUTHERN MOVEMENT AND THE MARCH BROUGHT IT INTO FOCUS FOR BLACK SOUTHERN MOVEMENT AND THE MARCH BROUGHT IT INTO FOCUS FOR MOST AMERICANS AND FOR A GLOBAL MARCH BROUGHT IT INTO FOCUS FOR MOST AMERICANS AND FOR A GLOBAL AUDIENCE, IN A WAY THAT IT WAS MOST AMERICANS AND FOR A GLOBAL AUDIENCE, IN A WAY THAT IT WAS AN AMERICAN MOVEMENT, A AUDIENCE, IN A WAY THAT IT WAS AN AMERICAN MOVEMENT, A REVOLUTION.
AN AMERICAN MOVEMENT, A REVOLUTION.
THE INTEGRATED NATURE OF THE REVOLUTION.
THE INTEGRATED NATURE OF THE MARCH HELPED THAT ALONG.
THE INTEGRATED NATURE OF THE MARCH HELPED THAT ALONG.
>> YET THE KENNEDY MARCH HELPED THAT ALONG.
>> YET THE KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION WAS NERVOUS >> YET THE KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION WAS NERVOUS ENOUGH ABOUT POTENTIAL FOR ADMINISTRATION WAS NERVOUS ENOUGH ABOUT POTENTIAL FOR VIOLENCE IN A MARCH OF THIS TYPE ENOUGH ABOUT POTENTIAL FOR VIOLENCE IN A MARCH OF THIS TYPE AND THE PRESIDENT VIOLENCE IN A MARCH OF THIS TYPE AND THE PRESIDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL WERE LIKE, I AND THE PRESIDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL WERE LIKE, I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS A GOOD ATTORNEY GENERAL WERE LIKE, I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS A GOOD IDEA.
DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS A GOOD IDEA.
IN FACT, HE HAD SOME OF THE IDEA.
IN FACT, HE HAD SOME OF THE LEADERS INTO THE WHITE HOUSE.
IN FACT, HE HAD SOME OF THE LEADERS INTO THE WHITE HOUSE.
>> HE DID AND THINK OF IT, THEY LEADERS INTO THE WHITE HOUSE.
>> HE DID AND THINK OF IT, THEY HAD THE MARCH ON A WEDNESDAY.
>> HE DID AND THINK OF IT, THEY HAD THE MARCH ON A WEDNESDAY.
THE LIQUOR ALL HAD THE MARCH ON A WEDNESDAY.
THE LIQUOR ALL STORES IN D.C.
THE LIQUOR ALL STORES IN D.C.
THEY HAD ARMY RESERVES ON NOTICE STORES IN D.C.
THEY HAD ARMY RESERVES ON NOTICE TO COME INTO THE CITY THEY HAD ARMY RESERVES ON NOTICE TO COME INTO THE CITY IF THINGS TURNED VIOLENT.
TO COME INTO THE CITY IF THINGS TURNED VIOLENT.
AND KENNEDY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT TO IF THINGS TURNED VIOLENT.
AND KENNEDY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT TO IT, LET'S FACE IT.
AND KENNEDY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT TO IT, LET'S FACE IT.
HE WAS WORRIED THAT ALL THESE IT, LET'S FACE IT.
HE WAS WORRIED THAT ALL THESE PEOPLE ARE COMING TO WASHINGTON, HE WAS WORRIED THAT ALL THESE PEOPLE ARE COMING TO WASHINGTON, IS AN UNHEARD OF PEOPLE ARE COMING TO WASHINGTON, IS AN UNHEARD OF KIND OF PHENOMENON IN THOSE DAYS IS AN UNHEARD OF KIND OF PHENOMENON IN THOSE DAYS SO HE WANTED TO BE HANDS-ON.
KIND OF PHENOMENON IN THOSE DAYS SO HE WANTED TO BE HANDS-ON.
SO IT WAS INTERESTING, AFTER THE SO HE WANTED TO BE HANDS-ON.
SO IT WAS INTERESTING, AFTER THE MARCH, HE HAD THE LEADERS COME SO IT WAS INTERESTING, AFTER THE MARCH, HE HAD THE LEADERS COME BACK TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND MARCH, HE HAD THE LEADERS COME BACK TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRATULATED THEM ON THE GREAT BACK TO THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRATULATED THEM ON THE GREAT SUCCESS.
CONGRATULATED THEM ON THE GREAT SUCCESS.
>> PRESIDENT KENNEDY INVITED US SUCCESS.
>> PRESIDENT KENNEDY INVITED US DOWN TO THE WHITE HOUSE.
>> PRESIDENT KENNEDY INVITED US DOWN TO THE WHITE HOUSE.
HE STOOD IN THE OVAL OFFICE AND DOWN TO THE WHITE HOUSE.
HE STOOD IN THE OVAL OFFICE AND US, SHOOK EACH ONE OF HE STOOD IN THE OVAL OFFICE AND US, SHOOK EACH ONE OF OUR HANDS.
US, SHOOK EACH ONE OF OUR HANDS.
PROUD LIKE A BEAMING OUR HANDS.
PROUD LIKE A BEAMING FATHER.
PROUD LIKE A BEAMING FATHER.
YOU COULD SEE IT ALL OVER HIM.
FATHER.
YOU COULD SEE IT ALL OVER HIM.
WAS SO HAPPY AND SO PLEASED YOU COULD SEE IT ALL OVER HIM.
WAS SO HAPPY AND SO PLEASED THAT EVERYTHING HAD GONE SO WAS SO HAPPY AND SO PLEASED THAT EVERYTHING HAD GONE SO WELL.
THAT EVERYTHING HAD GONE SO WELL.
GWEN: IN YOUR PIECE FOR THE WELL.
GWEN: IN YOUR PIECE FOR THE SMITHSONIAN, YOU TALKED TO A LOT GWEN: IN YOUR PIECE FOR THE SMITHSONIAN, YOU TALKED TO A LOT WERE THERE THAT DAY SMITHSONIAN, YOU TALKED TO A LOT WERE THERE THAT DAY AND SOME WHO SPOKE.
WERE THERE THAT DAY AND SOME WHO SPOKE.
HOW DID THEY LOOK BACK ON THAT AND SOME WHO SPOKE.
HOW DID THEY LOOK BACK ON THAT 50 YEARS VANTAGE?
HOW DID THEY LOOK BACK ON THAT 50 YEARS VANTAGE?
>> LOOKING BACK NOW, IF THEY 50 YEARS VANTAGE?
>> LOOKING BACK NOW, IF THEY 50-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE, >> LOOKING BACK NOW, IF THEY 50-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE, EVERYONE SEES IT AS A PIVOTAL 50-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE, EVERYONE SEES IT AS A PIVOTAL MOMENT IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS EVERYONE SEES IT AS A PIVOTAL MOMENT IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT, WHEN THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOMENT IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT, WHEN THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT GREW INTO AN MOVEMENT, WHEN THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT GREW INTO AN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT GREW INTO AN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS REGIONAL NOT JUST A INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS REGIONAL NOT JUST A RACE BASED KIND OF THING.
REGIONAL NOT JUST A RACE BASED KIND OF THING.
PRICKEDOMETHING THAT RACE BASED KIND OF THING.
PRICKEDOMETHING THAT CONSCIENCE.
PRICKEDOMETHING THAT CONSCIENCE.
WATEREDIS, HIS SPEECH CONSCIENCE.
WATEREDIS, HIS SPEECH DOWN OUT OF CONCERN OF BEING TOO WATEREDIS, HIS SPEECH DOWN OUT OF CONCERN OF BEING TOO RADICAL.
DOWN OUT OF CONCERN OF BEING TOO RADICAL.
CIVIL RIGHTSUT THE RADICAL.
CIVIL RIGHTSUT THE BILL NOT GOING TOO FAR ENOUGH.
CIVIL RIGHTSUT THE BILL NOT GOING TOO FAR ENOUGH.
WITH THE ADVANTAGE OF TIME BILL NOT GOING TOO FAR ENOUGH.
WITH THE ADVANTAGE OF TIME CENTURY,ACK A HALF A WITH THE ADVANTAGE OF TIME CENTURY,ACK A HALF A EVERYONE SAYS IT WAS AN CENTURY,ACK A HALF A EVERYONE SAYS IT WAS AN ASTOUNDING MOMENT.
EVERYONE SAYS IT WAS AN ASTOUNDING MOMENT.
GWEN: WE LOOK BACK AT THE ASTOUNDING MOMENT.
GWEN: WE LOOK BACK AT THE ONVERSATION THAT IS WENT GWEN: WE LOOK BACK AT THE ONVERSATION THAT IS WENT LEADING UP TO THE MARCH AND THE ONVERSATION THAT IS WENT LEADING UP TO THE MARCH AND THE COVERAGE SINCE, IT'S ALMOST ALL LEADING UP TO THE MARCH AND THE COVERAGE SINCE, IT'S ALMOST ALL ABOUT THE "I HAVE A DREAM" COVERAGE SINCE, IT'S ALMOST ALL ABOUT THE "I HAVE A DREAM" SPEECH.
ABOUT THE "I HAVE A DREAM" SPEECH.
YOU MENTION JOHN LEWIS' RADICAL SPEECH.
YOU MENTION JOHN LEWIS' RADICAL WHICH EVEN WATERED DOWN YOU MENTION JOHN LEWIS' RADICAL WHICH EVEN WATERED DOWN WAS PRETTY TOUGH BUT NOT SO WHICH EVEN WATERED DOWN WAS PRETTY TOUGH BUT NOT SO NOT HOW IT'SS WAS PRETTY TOUGH BUT NOT SO NOT HOW IT'SS REMEMBERED.
NOT HOW IT'SS REMEMBERED.
>> IT'S INTERESTING.
REMEMBERED.
>> IT'S INTERESTING.
PEOPLE OBVIOUSLY TALK ABOUT >> IT'S INTERESTING.
PEOPLE OBVIOUSLY TALK ABOUT AND EVERYONEEECH PEOPLE OBVIOUSLY TALK ABOUT AND EVERYONEEECH REMEMBERS "I HAVE A DREAM" BUT AND EVERYONEEECH REMEMBERS "I HAVE A DREAM" BUT THE ORIGINAL IN ADDITION NOTIONE REMEMBERS "I HAVE A DREAM" BUT THE ORIGINAL IN ADDITION NOTIONE MARCH WAS A MARCH FOR JOBS AND THE ORIGINAL IN ADDITION NOTIONE MARCH WAS A MARCH FOR JOBS AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE AND THE FREEDOM MARCH WAS A MARCH FOR JOBS AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE AND THE FREEDOM ADDED ON AS AT ECONOMIC JUSTICE AND THE FREEDOM ADDED ON AS AT RESULT OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS BILL ADDED ON AS AT RESULT OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS BILL OF MEDGARSASSINATION RESULT OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS BILL OF MEDGARSASSINATION EVERS.
OF MEDGARSASSINATION EVERS.
IT WAS ALMOST A SECONDARY THING EVERS.
IT WAS ALMOST A SECONDARY THING EVERYONET'S A THING IT WAS ALMOST A SECONDARY THING EVERYONET'S A THING REMEMBERS.
EVERYONET'S A THING REMEMBERS.
ANOTHER THING PEOPLE REMEMBER REMEMBERS.
ANOTHER THING PEOPLE REMEMBER WHEN THEY LOOK BACK, THEY SAY ANOTHER THING PEOPLE REMEMBER WHEN THEY LOOK BACK, THEY SAY THAT'S THE PART OF THE AGENDA WHEN THEY LOOK BACK, THEY SAY THAT'S THE PART OF THE AGENDA FULFILLED.
THAT'S THE PART OF THE AGENDA FULFILLED.
YOU LOOK AT ECONOMIC DISPARITIES FULFILLED.
YOU LOOK AT ECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN THIS COUNTRY REMAIN.
YOU LOOK AT ECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN THIS COUNTRY REMAIN.
HAVE MADEERICANS IN THIS COUNTRY REMAIN.
HAVE MADEERICANS GREAT PROGRESS, WITH THIS AND HAVE MADEERICANS GREAT PROGRESS, WITH THIS AND THAT, BUT YOU HAVE HUGE GREAT PROGRESS, WITH THIS AND THAT, BUT YOU HAVE HUGE DISPARITIES IN TERMS OF INCOME, THAT, BUT YOU HAVE HUGE DISPARITIES IN TERMS OF INCOME, IN TERMS OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATES.
DISPARITIES IN TERMS OF INCOME, IN TERMS OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATES.
THEY'RE ALMOST IDENTICAL TO WHAT IN TERMS OF UNEMPLOYMENT RATES.
THEY'RE ALMOST IDENTICAL TO WHAT WERE IN 1963.
THEY'RE ALMOST IDENTICAL TO WHAT WERE IN 1963.
GWEN: EVEN DR. KING'S SPEECH, HE WERE IN 1963.
GWEN: EVEN DR. KING'S SPEECH, HE NOTE.ABOUT A PROMISSORY GWEN: EVEN DR. KING'S SPEECH, HE NOTE.ABOUT A PROMISSORY HE TALKED ABOUT WHAT AMERICANS NOTE.ABOUT A PROMISSORY HE TALKED ABOUT WHAT AMERICANS WERE OWED.
HE TALKED ABOUT WHAT AMERICANS WERE OWED.
HE WASN'T JUST TALKING ABOUT WERE OWED.
HE WASN'T JUST TALKING ABOUT INTEGRATION.
HE WASN'T JUST TALKING ABOUT INTEGRATION.
>> NO, NOT AT ALL.
INTEGRATION.
>> NO, NOT AT ALL.
HE WAS TALKING ABOUT ECONOMIC >> NO, NOT AT ALL.
HE WAS TALKING ABOUT ECONOMIC JUSTICE AND YOU SAW WHERE HE HE WAS TALKING ABOUT ECONOMIC JUSTICE AND YOU SAW WHERE HE THE YEARS FOLLOWING THE JUSTICE AND YOU SAW WHERE HE THE YEARS FOLLOWING THE MARCH, THE POOR PEOPLE'S THE YEARS FOLLOWING THE MARCH, THE POOR PEOPLE'S CAMPAIGN AND ALL OF THAT AND HIS MARCH, THE POOR PEOPLE'S CAMPAIGN AND ALL OF THAT AND HIS EFFORTS TO TRY TO LIFT SO MANY CAMPAIGN AND ALL OF THAT AND HIS EFFORTS TO TRY TO LIFT SO MANY AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND OTHERS OUT EFFORTS TO TRY TO LIFT SO MANY AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND OTHERS OUT OF POVERTY.
AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND OTHERS OUT OF POVERTY.
FOCUS.S HIS OF POVERTY.
FOCUS.S HIS BIRAD RUSTEN TALKED ABOUT THAT.
FOCUS.S HIS BIRAD RUSTEN TALKED ABOUT THAT.
HE WROTE A SPEECH AFTER THE BIRAD RUSTEN TALKED ABOUT THAT.
HE WROTE A SPEECH AFTER THE MARCH SAYING THE ROOTS OF HE WROTE A SPEECH AFTER THE MARCH SAYING THE ROOTS OF DISCRIMINATION ARE ECONOMIC AND MARCH SAYING THE ROOTS OF DISCRIMINATION ARE ECONOMIC AND THE ECONOMY, THE ECONOMY IN THIS DISCRIMINATION ARE ECONOMIC AND THE ECONOMY, THE ECONOMY IN THIS COUNTRY HAS TO SHIFT FOR THE THE ECONOMY, THE ECONOMY IN THIS COUNTRY HAS TO SHIFT FOR THE REAL REALITY OF PEOPLE'S LIVES COUNTRY HAS TO SHIFT FOR THE REAL REALITY OF PEOPLE'S LIVES CHANGED.
REAL REALITY OF PEOPLE'S LIVES CHANGED.
GWEN: LOOKING BACK NOW 50 YEARS CHANGED.
GWEN: LOOKING BACK NOW 50 YEARS ENTIRETHERE'S AN GWEN: LOOKING BACK NOW 50 YEARS ENTIRETHERE'S AN GENERATION, A COUPLE OF ENTIRETHERE'S AN GENERATION, A COUPLE OF GENERATIONS OF PEOPLE GOING DOWN GENERATION, A COUPLE OF GENERATIONS OF PEOPLE GOING DOWN AND LOOKING AT THE GENERATIONS OF PEOPLE GOING DOWN AND LOOKING AT THE MARTIN LUTHER KING MEMORIAL AND AND LOOKING AT THE MARTIN LUTHER KING MEMORIAL AND THE ONLY MONUMENT IN WASHINGTON MARTIN LUTHER KING MEMORIAL AND THE ONLY MONUMENT IN WASHINGTON TO A NONELECTED OFFICIAL AND THE ONLY MONUMENT IN WASHINGTON TO A NONELECTED OFFICIAL AND HE'S A BLACK MAN AND A LOT OF TO A NONELECTED OFFICIAL AND HE'S A BLACK MAN AND A LOT OF THAT INIT TIED UP IN HE'S A BLACK MAN AND A LOT OF THAT INIT TIED UP IN THE VERY FACT OF ITS EXISTENCE.
THAT INIT TIED UP IN THE VERY FACT OF ITS EXISTENCE.
50 YEARS LATER, THOUGH, IF KING THE VERY FACT OF ITS EXISTENCE.
50 YEARS LATER, THOUGH, IF KING ABLE TO STAND IN THAT SPOT 50 YEARS LATER, THOUGH, IF KING ABLE TO STAND IN THAT SPOT AND LOOK OUT, WHAT IS THE LEGACY ABLE TO STAND IN THAT SPOT AND LOOK OUT, WHAT IS THE LEGACY THAT SOME PEOPLE SAY AND LOOK OUT, WHAT IS THE LEGACY THAT SOME PEOPLE SAY WE HAVE A BLACK PRESIDENT, THAT SOME PEOPLE SAY WE HAVE A BLACK PRESIDENT, EVERYTHING'S MUCH BETTER, AND WE HAVE A BLACK PRESIDENT, EVERYTHING'S MUCH BETTER, AND WE HAVE SO SAY, EVERYTHING'S MUCH BETTER, AND WE HAVE SO SAY, FARTHER TO GO.
WE HAVE SO SAY, FARTHER TO GO.
>> I THINK IT'S MIXED.
FARTHER TO GO.
>> I THINK IT'S MIXED.
TOCOURSE THERE'S NO WAY >> I THINK IT'S MIXED.
TOCOURSE THERE'S NO WAY DIMINISH THE ASTOUNDING SENSE OF TOCOURSE THERE'S NO WAY DIMINISH THE ASTOUNDING SENSE OF HAVING A BLACK PRESIDENT.
DIMINISH THE ASTOUNDING SENSE OF HAVING A BLACK PRESIDENT.
THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN HAVING A BLACK PRESIDENT.
THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN UNTHINKABLE.
THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN UNTHINKABLE.
IMAGINE SOMEONE SAYING THAT FROM UNTHINKABLE.
IMAGINE SOMEONE SAYING THAT FROM PODIUM 1963.
IMAGINE SOMEONE SAYING THAT FROM PODIUM 1963.
THAT WOULD BE A GREAT DREAM BUT PODIUM 1963.
THAT WOULD BE A GREAT DREAM BUT IT'S A REALITY.
THAT WOULD BE A GREAT DREAM BUT IT'S A REALITY.
LEGACY.ART OF THE IT'S A REALITY.
LEGACY.ART OF THE THERE'S BEEN OBVIOUSLY GREAT LEGACY.ART OF THE THERE'S BEEN OBVIOUSLY GREAT GROWTH IN THE BLACK MIDDLE THERE'S BEEN OBVIOUSLY GREAT GROWTH IN THE BLACK MIDDLE CLASS.
GROWTH IN THE BLACK MIDDLE CLASS.
DOINGE AFRICAN-AMERICANS CLASS.
DOINGE AFRICAN-AMERICANS ALL KINDS OF THINGS IN ALL WALKS DOINGE AFRICAN-AMERICANS ALL KINDS OF THINGS IN ALL WALKS OF LIFE SO THAT'S PART OF THE ALL KINDS OF THINGS IN ALL WALKS OF LIFE SO THAT'S PART OF THE LEGACY BUT YOU STILL HAVE THIS OF LIFE SO THAT'S PART OF THE LEGACY BUT YOU STILL HAVE THIS 27% ROUGHLY OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS LEGACY BUT YOU STILL HAVE THIS 27% ROUGHLY OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS LIVING IN POVERTY.
27% ROUGHLY OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS LIVING IN POVERTY.
THAT'S HUGE AND THAT HASN'T LIVING IN POVERTY.
THAT'S HUGE AND THAT HASN'T IMPROVED THAT MUCH OVER THE LAST THAT'S HUGE AND THAT HASN'T IMPROVED THAT MUCH OVER THE LAST 30 OR 40 YEARS.
IMPROVED THAT MUCH OVER THE LAST 30 OR 40 YEARS.
IT WAS GREAT IMPROVEMENT THROUGH 30 OR 40 YEARS.
IT WAS GREAT IMPROVEMENT THROUGH THAT, THATBUT AFTER IT WAS GREAT IMPROVEMENT THROUGH THAT, THATBUT AFTER PROGRESS SLOWED SO THAT'S PART THAT, THATBUT AFTER PROGRESS SLOWED SO THAT'S PART OF THE LEGACY.
PROGRESS SLOWED SO THAT'S PART OF THE LEGACY.
INRE'S BEEN GREAT PROGRESS OF THE LEGACY.
INRE'S BEEN GREAT PROGRESS EDUCATION BUT NOT ENOUGH.
INRE'S BEEN GREAT PROGRESS EDUCATION BUT NOT ENOUGH.
THAT'S PART OF THE LEGACY.
EDUCATION BUT NOT ENOUGH.
THAT'S PART OF THE LEGACY.
ANY INNER CITY AND THAT'S PART OF THE LEGACY.
ANY INNER CITY AND LOOK AT THE HOUSING.
ANY INNER CITY AND LOOK AT THE HOUSING.
YOU HAVE PROSPEROUS LOOK AT THE HOUSING.
YOU HAVE PROSPEROUS ANDCAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITIES YOU HAVE PROSPEROUS ANDCAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITIES POOR ONES SO YOU HAVE A MIXED ANDCAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITIES POOR ONES SO YOU HAVE A MIXED GACYLE AND IT SPEAKS TO THE NEED POOR ONES SO YOU HAVE A MIXED GACYLE AND IT SPEAKS TO THE NEED STRUGGLE TO CONTIE.NU GACYLE AND IT SPEAKS TO THE NEED STRUGGLE TO CONTIE.NU >> IT HAS BEEN ONE OF THE GREAT STRUGGLE TO CONTIE.NU >> IT HAS BEEN ONE OF THE GREAT OF AMERICA AND I THINK THIS >> IT HAS BEEN ONE OF THE GREAT OF AMERICA AND I THINK THIS AS ONE OF THEDOWN OF AMERICA AND I THINK THIS AS ONE OF THEDOWN GREATEST, IF NOT THE GREATEST, AS ONE OF THEDOWN GREATEST, IF NOT THE GREATEST, FOR FREEDOM AND GREATEST, IF NOT THE GREATEST, FOR FREEDOM AND THEN DIGNITY EVER HELD IN FOR FREEDOM AND THEN DIGNITY EVER HELD IN UNITED STATES.
THEN DIGNITY EVER HELD IN UNITED STATES.
LOOKINGOKING BACK AND UNITED STATES.
LOOKINGOKING BACK AND FORWARD.
LOOKINGOKING BACK AND FORWARD.
FOR MORE, BE SURE TO WATCH "THE FORWARD.
FOR MORE, BE SURE TO WATCH "THE DOCUMENTARYONE-HOUR FOR MORE, BE SURE TO WATCH "THE DOCUMENTARYONE-HOUR ON THE STORY BEHIND THAT DAY, DOCUMENTARYONE-HOUR ON THE STORY BEHIND THAT DAY, TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, AT 9:00 P.M. ON THE STORY BEHIND THAT DAY, TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, AT 9:00 P.M. ON MOST PBS STATIONS.
TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, AT 9:00 P.M. ON MOST PBS STATIONS.
OUR WEBCAST EXTRA STREAMS LIVE ON MOST PBS STATIONS.
OUR WEBCAST EXTRA STREAMS LIVE BEGINNING AT 8:30 P.M. TONIGHT OUR WEBCAST EXTRA STREAMS LIVE BEGINNING AT 8:30 P.M. TONIGHT EASTERN TIME AND ALL WEEKEND BEGINNING AT 8:30 P.M. TONIGHT EASTERN TIME AND ALL WEEKEND LONG AT PBS.ORG/WASHINGTONWEEK.
EASTERN TIME AND ALL WEEKEND LONG AT PBS.ORG/WASHINGTONWEEK.
WEEK ONE YOU NEXT LONG AT PBS.ORG/WASHINGTONWEEK.
WEEK ONE YOU NEXT "WASHINGTON WEEK."
WEEK ONE YOU NEXT "WASHINGTON WEEK."
GOOD NIGHT.
- News and Public Affairs
Top journalists deliver compelling original analysis of the hour's headlines.
- News and Public Affairs
FRONTLINE is investigative journalism that questions, explains and changes our world.
Support for PBS provided by:
Major funding for “Washington Week with The Atlantic” is provided by Consumer Cellular, Otsuka, Kaiser Permanente, the Yuen Foundation, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.