GWEN:WITH THOUSANDS KILLED AND HUNDREDS MORE POISONED ALLEGEDLY BY CHEMICAL WEAPONS, THE OBAMA HUNDREDS MORE POISONED ALLEGEDLY BY CHEMICAL WEAPONS, THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION MAKES THE CASE BY CHEMICAL WEAPONS, THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION MAKES THE CASE ACTION IN SYRIA.

ADMINISTRATION MAKES THE CASE ACTION IN SYRIA.

TONIGHT, ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."

ACTION IN SYRIA.

TONIGHT, ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."

TOUGH TALK -- TONIGHT, ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."

TOUGH TALK -- >> THERE'S NO DOUBT WHO IS TOUGH TALK -- >> THERE'S NO DOUBT WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS HEINOUS USE >> THERE'S NO DOUBT WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS HEINOUS USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA, RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS HEINOUS USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA, SYRIAN REGIME.

OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN SYRIA, SYRIAN REGIME.

TIMING.PTOE SYRIAN REGIME.

TIMING.PTOE >> I HAVE NOT MADE A DECISION.

TIMING.PTOE >> I HAVE NOT MADE A DECISION.

I HAVE GOTTEN OPTIONS FROM OUR >> I HAVE NOT MADE A DECISION.

I HAVE GOTTEN OPTIONS FROM OUR MILITARY.

I HAVE GOTTEN OPTIONS FROM OUR MILITARY.

GWEN: AND TODAY, A FIERCE APPEAL MILITARY.

GWEN: AND TODAY, A FIERCE APPEAL TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

GWEN: AND TODAY, A FIERCE APPEAL TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

PREVIOUS STORMS IN HISTORY TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

PREVIOUS STORMS IN HISTORY HAVE GATHERED WHEN UNSPEAKABLE PREVIOUS STORMS IN HISTORY HAVE GATHERED WHEN UNSPEAKABLE WITHIN OUR POWER TO HAVE GATHERED WHEN UNSPEAKABLE WITHIN OUR POWER TO STOP THEM, WE HAVE BEEN WARNED WITHIN OUR POWER TO STOP THEM, WE HAVE BEEN WARNED TEMPTATIONS OF STOP THEM, WE HAVE BEEN WARNED TEMPTATIONS OF LOOKING THE OTHER WAY.

TEMPTATIONS OF LOOKING THE OTHER WAY.

GWEN: THE CRISISVER OSYRIA LOOKING THE OTHER WAY.

GWEN: THE CRISISVER OSYRIA BOILING POINT.

GWEN: THE CRISISVER OSYRIA BOILING POINT.

BRITAIN BOWS OUT AND THE U.S. BOILING POINT.

BRITAIN BOWS OUT AND THE U.S. TO WEIGH IN.NS BRITAIN BOWS OUT AND THE U.S. TO WEIGH IN.NS >> WE HAVE TO ACT.

TO WEIGH IN.NS >> WE HAVE TO ACT.

ONCE THE RED LINE HAS BEEN >> WE HAVE TO ACT.

ONCE THE RED LINE HAS BEEN CROSSED, ONCE CHEMICAL WEAPONS ONCE THE RED LINE HAS BEEN CROSSED, ONCE CHEMICAL WEAPONS HAVE BEEN USED, I BELIEVE THE CROSSED, ONCE CHEMICAL WEAPONS HAVE BEEN USED, I BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT HAS TO TAKE ACTION.

HAVE BEEN USED, I BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT HAS TO TAKE ACTION.

>> I DEFINITELY BELIEVE THERE PRESIDENT HAS TO TAKE ACTION.

>> I DEFINITELY BELIEVE THERE BE A VOTE.

>> I DEFINITELY BELIEVE THERE BE A VOTE.

GWEN: AND SYRIA PREPARES.

BE A VOTE.

GWEN: AND SYRIA PREPARES.

>> WE ARE IN A STATE OF WAR GWEN: AND SYRIA PREPARES.

>> WE ARE IN A STATE OF WAR NOW PREPARING OURSELVES >> WE ARE IN A STATE OF WAR NOW PREPARING OURSELVES FOR THE WORST SCENARIO.

NOW PREPARING OURSELVES FOR THE WORST SCENARIO.

GWEN: IS THE U.S. ON THE VERGE FOR THE WORST SCENARIO.

GWEN: IS THE U.S. ON THE VERGE OF LIMITED BUT CERTAIN WAR?

GWEN: IS THE U.S. ON THE VERGE OF LIMITED BUT CERTAIN WAR?

COVERING THE WEEK, PETER BAKER OF LIMITED BUT CERTAIN WAR?

COVERING THE WEEK, PETER BAKER TIMES," JOHNORK COVERING THE WEEK, PETER BAKER TIMES," JOHNORK HARWOOD OF CNBC AND THE "NEW TIMES," JOHNORK HARWOOD OF CNBC AND THE "NEW AND INDIRA , HARWOOD OF CNBC AND THE "NEW AND INDIRA , LAKSHMANAN OF BLOOMBERG NEWS.

AND INDIRA , LAKSHMANAN OF BLOOMBERG NEWS.

REPORTING ANDNG LAKSHMANAN OF BLOOMBERG NEWS.

REPORTING ANDNG ITLYSIS, COVERING HISTORY AS REPORTING ANDNG ITLYSIS, COVERING HISTORY AS HAPPENS, LIVE FROM OUR NATION'S ITLYSIS, COVERING HISTORY AS HAPPENS, LIVE FROM OUR NATION'S CAPITAL, THIS IS "WASHINGTON HAPPENS, LIVE FROM OUR NATION'S CAPITAL, THIS IS "WASHINGTON WEEK" WITH GWEN IFILL.

ONCE AGAIN, LIVE FROM MODERATOR GWEN IFILL.

MODERATOR GWEN IFILL.

GWEN: GOOD EVENING.

IFILL.

GWEN: GOOD EVENING.

PEOPLE SAY AUGUST IS A SLOW NEWS GWEN: GOOD EVENING.

PEOPLE SAY AUGUST IS A SLOW NEWS MONTH.

PEOPLE SAY AUGUST IS A SLOW NEWS MONTH.

TELL THAT TO THE SECRETARY MONTH.

TELL THAT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OR THE PRIME MINISTER TELL THAT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OR THE PRIME MINISTER OF GREAT BRITAIN OR THE OF STATE OR THE PRIME MINISTER OF GREAT BRITAIN OR THE OF SYRIA OR THE OF GREAT BRITAIN OR THE OF SYRIA OR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF SYRIA OR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHO IS NOW MAKING THE CASE THAT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHO IS NOW MAKING THE CASE THAT TIME FOR THE U.S. TO ACT.

WHO IS NOW MAKING THE CASE THAT TIME FOR THE U.S. TO ACT.

IN AN INTERVIEW AT THE WHITE TIME FOR THE U.S. TO ACT.

IN AN INTERVIEW AT THE WHITE WOODRUFFS WEEK, JUDY IN AN INTERVIEW AT THE WHITE WOODRUFFS WEEK, JUDY AND I ASKED PRESIDENT OBAMA WHY.

WOODRUFFS WEEK, JUDY AND I ASKED PRESIDENT OBAMA WHY.

ARE SAYING IN A CLEAR AND I ASKED PRESIDENT OBAMA WHY.

ARE SAYING IN A CLEAR BUT VERY LIMITED ARE SAYING IN A CLEAR BUT VERY LIMITED THE WE SEND A SHOT ACROSS BUT VERY LIMITED THE WE SEND A SHOT ACROSS BOW SAYING, STOP DOING THIS, THE WE SEND A SHOT ACROSS BOW SAYING, STOP DOING THIS, THAT CAN HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT BOW SAYING, STOP DOING THIS, THAT CAN HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT OUR NATIONAL SECURITY OVER THAT CAN HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT OUR NATIONAL SECURITY OVER THE LONG TERM AND MAY HAVE A OUR NATIONAL SECURITY OVER THE LONG TERM AND MAY HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT IN THE SENSE THE LONG TERM AND MAY HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT IN THE SENSE WEAPONS ARE NOT POSITIVE IMPACT IN THE SENSE WEAPONS ARE NOT USED AGAIN ON INNOCENT WEAPONS ARE NOT USED AGAIN ON INNOCENT CIVILIANS.

USED AGAIN ON INNOCENT CIVILIANS.

BOW.

SHOT ACROSS THE CIVILIANS.

BOW.

SHOT ACROSS THE IF YOU LISTEN CAREFULLY, YOU SEE BOW.

SHOT ACROSS THE IF YOU LISTEN CAREFULLY, YOU SEE THE PRESIDENT BEGINNING TO MAKE IF YOU LISTEN CAREFULLY, YOU SEE THE PRESIDENT BEGINNING TO MAKE CASE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THE PRESIDENT BEGINNING TO MAKE CASE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR YET ANOTHER MIDDLE EAST CASE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR YET ANOTHER MIDDLE EAST INTERVENTION.

FOR YET ANOTHER MIDDLE EAST INTERVENTION.

SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY INTERVENTION.

SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FOLLOWED UP WITH FORCE TODAY.

SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FOLLOWED UP WITH FORCE TODAY.

>> THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOLLOWED UP WITH FORCE TODAY.

>> THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 1,429OWS THAT AT LEAST >> THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 1,429OWS THAT AT LEAST SYRIANS WERE KILLED IN THIS 1,429OWS THAT AT LEAST SYRIANS WERE KILLED IN THIS ATTACK INCLUDING AT LEAST 426 SYRIANS WERE KILLED IN THIS ATTACK INCLUDING AT LEAST 426 CHILDREN.

ATTACK INCLUDING AT LEAST 426 CHILDREN.

THIS IS THE INDISCRIMINATE, CHILDREN.

THIS IS THE INDISCRIMINATE, HORROR OF CHEMICAL THIS IS THE INDISCRIMINATE, HORROR OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

HORROR OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

THIS IS WHAT ASSAD DID TO HIS WEAPONS.

THIS IS WHAT ASSAD DID TO HIS OWN PEOPLE.

THIS IS WHAT ASSAD DID TO HIS OWN PEOPLE.

GWEN: THIS AFTERNOON, THE OWN PEOPLE.

GWEN: THIS AFTERNOON, THE PRESIDENT CALLED SYRIA A GWEN: THIS AFTERNOON, THE PRESIDENT CALLED SYRIA A CHALLENGE TO THE WORLD.

PRESIDENT CALLED SYRIA A CHALLENGE TO THE WORLD.

TROUBLE IS, AMERICANS ARE NOT CHALLENGE TO THE WORLD.

TROUBLE IS, AMERICANS ARE NOT CRAZY ABOUT INTERVENTION.

TROUBLE IS, AMERICANS ARE NOT CRAZY ABOUT INTERVENTION.

NEWS POLL SHOWS HALF CRAZY ABOUT INTERVENTION.

NEWS POLL SHOWS HALF OF US DO NOT WANT THE U.S. TO NEWS POLL SHOWS HALF OF US DO NOT WANT THE U.S. TO 80% SAID AT LEAST OF US DO NOT WANT THE U.S. TO 80% SAID AT LEAST THERE SHOULD BE CONGRESSIONAL 80% SAID AT LEAST THERE SHOULD BE CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL FIRST BUT IF AMERICANS THERE SHOULD BE CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL FIRST BUT IF AMERICANS MINDS, BRITAINS ARE APPROVAL FIRST BUT IF AMERICANS MINDS, BRITAINS ARE MORE RELUCTANT, REBUFFING THEIR MINDS, BRITAINS ARE MORE RELUCTANT, REBUFFING THEIR WHEN HEE MINISTER MORE RELUCTANT, REBUFFING THEIR WHEN HEE MINISTER APPEALED FOR ACTION.

WHEN HEE MINISTER APPEALED FOR ACTION.

>> I STRONGLY BELIEVE IN THE APPEALED FOR ACTION.

>> I STRONGLY BELIEVE IN THE THE FOR A TOUGH RESPONSE TO >> I STRONGLY BELIEVE IN THE THE FOR A TOUGH RESPONSE TO USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS BUT I THE FOR A TOUGH RESPONSE TO USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS BUT I ALSO BELIEVE IN RESPECTING THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS BUT I ALSO BELIEVE IN RESPECTING THE WILL OF THIS HOUSE OF COMMONS.

ALSO BELIEVE IN RESPECTING THE WILL OF THIS HOUSE OF COMMONS.

IS VERY CLEAR TONIGHT THAT WILL OF THIS HOUSE OF COMMONS.

IS VERY CLEAR TONIGHT THAT WHILE THE HOUSE HAS NOT PASSED A IS VERY CLEAR TONIGHT THAT WHILE THE HOUSE HAS NOT PASSED A TO ME THATIS CLEAR WHILE THE HOUSE HAS NOT PASSED A TO ME THATIS CLEAR THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT, TO ME THATIS CLEAR THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT, REFLECTING THE VIEWS OF THE THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT, REFLECTING THE VIEWS OF THE TOTISH PEOPLE, DOES NOT WANT REFLECTING THE VIEWS OF THE TOTISH PEOPLE, DOES NOT WANT SEE BRITISH MILARY ITACTION.

TOTISH PEOPLE, DOES NOT WANT SEE BRITISH MILARY ITACTION.

I GET THAT AND THE GOVERNMENT SEE BRITISH MILARY ITACTION.

I GET THAT AND THE GOVERNMENT ACT ACCORDINGLY.

I GET THAT AND THE GOVERNMENT ACT ACCORDINGLY.

GWEN: THE PRESIDENT SAYS HE HAS ACT ACCORDINGLY.

GWEN: THE PRESIDENT SAYS HE HAS NOT DECIDED WHEN TO ACT BUT IT GWEN: THE PRESIDENT SAYS HE HAS NOT DECIDED WHEN TO ACT BUT IT HAS DECIDED TO NOT DECIDED WHEN TO ACT BUT IT HAS DECIDED TO ACT, PETER?

HAS DECIDED TO ACT, PETER?

>> IT'S HARD TO IMAGINE HE CAN'T ACT, PETER?

>> IT'S HARD TO IMAGINE HE CAN'T GIVEN THE COMMENTS MADE >> IT'S HARD TO IMAGINE HE CAN'T GIVEN THE COMMENTS MADE TODAY ABOUT THE SYRIAN GIVEN THE COMMENTS MADE TODAY ABOUT THE SYRIAN CULPABILITY.

TODAY ABOUT THE SYRIAN CULPABILITY.

SECRETARY OF STATE KERRY SAID CULPABILITY.

SECRETARY OF STATE KERRY SAID INACTION IS NOT AN OPTION SO THE SECRETARY OF STATE KERRY SAID INACTION IS NOT AN OPTION SO THE QUESTION IS THE TIMING AND THE INACTION IS NOT AN OPTION SO THE QUESTION IS THE TIMING AND THE EXTENT OF THE MILITARY STRIKE, QUESTION IS THE TIMING AND THE EXTENT OF THE MILITARY STRIKE, IS IT A ONE-DAY, IS IT A EXTENT OF THE MILITARY STRIKE, IS IT A ONE-DAY, IS IT A TWO-DAY?

IS IT A ONE-DAY, IS IT A TWO-DAY?

WHAT'S THE IMPACT, DOES IT TWO-DAY?

WHAT'S THE IMPACT, DOES IT ACCOMPLISH WHAT THEY WANT IT TO WHAT'S THE IMPACT, DOES IT ACCOMPLISH WHAT THEY WANT IT TO ACCOMPLISH.

ACCOMPLISH WHAT THEY WANT IT TO ACCOMPLISH.

THE STATEY AT ACCOMPLISH.

THE STATEY AT DEPARTMENT, JOHN KERRY NOT ONLY THE STATEY AT DEPARTMENT, JOHN KERRY NOT ONLY MADE A FORCEFUL RELEASE BUT ALSO DEPARTMENT, JOHN KERRY NOT ONLY MADE A FORCEFUL RELEASE BUT ALSO A MAP SHOWING MADE A FORCEFUL RELEASE BUT ALSO A MAP SHOWING UNCLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS SHOWING A MAP SHOWING UNCLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS SHOWING LAUNCHED MISSILES WERE UNCLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS SHOWING LAUNCHED MISSILES WERE LANDED THATEY LAUNCHED MISSILES WERE LANDED THATEY CARRIED THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

LANDED THATEY CARRIED THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

>> IN THE DECLASSIFIED CARRIED THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

>> IN THE DECLASSIFIED THEY LAID OUT THE >> IN THE DECLASSIFIED THEY LAID OUT THE BEST CASE THEY COULD MAKE THEY LAID OUT THE BEST CASE THEY COULD MAKE PUBLICLY.

BEST CASE THEY COULD MAKE PUBLICLY.

THEY CLAIM AND THE PUBLICLY.

THEY CLAIM AND THE SAYINGTRATION HAS BEEN THEY CLAIM AND THE SAYINGTRATION HAS BEEN SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE WEEK SAYINGTRATION HAS BEEN SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE WEEK WHEN SECRETARY KERRY FIRST SPOKE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE WEEK WHEN SECRETARY KERRY FIRST SPOKE TO US ABOUT THIS, BOTH TIMES WHEN SECRETARY KERRY FIRST SPOKE TO US ABOUT THIS, BOTH TIMES TALKING ABOUT THE AGONY OF TO US ABOUT THIS, BOTH TIMES TALKING ABOUT THE AGONY OF SEEING DEAD CHILDREN, HE DID SAY TALKING ABOUT THE AGONY OF SEEING DEAD CHILDREN, HE DID SAY HAVE CERTAIN EVIDENCE WE SEEING DEAD CHILDREN, HE DID SAY HAVE CERTAIN EVIDENCE WE CAN'T SHARE BECAUSE IT WOULD BE HAVE CERTAIN EVIDENCE WE CAN'T SHARE BECAUSE IT WOULD BE AND METHODS.CES CAN'T SHARE BECAUSE IT WOULD BE AND METHODS.CES WHAT I THINK IS REALLY AND METHODS.CES WHAT I THINK IS REALLY INTERESTING IS WE DO HAVE, SOME WHAT I THINK IS REALLY INTERESTING IS WE DO HAVE, SOME BLOOMBERG COLLEAGUES HAVE INTERESTING IS WE DO HAVE, SOME BLOOMBERG COLLEAGUES HAVE REPORTED ON INTELLIGENCE SOURCES BLOOMBERG COLLEAGUES HAVE REPORTED ON INTELLIGENCE SOURCES NO CLEARTHEM THERE IS REPORTED ON INTELLIGENCE SOURCES NO CLEARTHEM THERE IS CHAIN OF COMMAND SO THEY NEVER NO CLEARTHEM THERE IS CHAIN OF COMMAND SO THEY NEVER POINT THE FINGER DIRECTLY AT CHAIN OF COMMAND SO THEY NEVER POINT THE FINGER DIRECTLY AT ASSAD HIMSELF HAVING ORDERED POINT THE FINGER DIRECTLY AT ASSAD HIMSELF HAVING ORDERED THAT CHEMICAL WEAPONS STRIKE SO ASSAD HIMSELF HAVING ORDERED THAT CHEMICAL WEAPONS STRIKE SO THAT'S SIGNIFICANT TO SOME THAT CHEMICAL WEAPONS STRIKE SO THAT'S SIGNIFICANT TO SOME KNOW HEHAT HOW DO WE THAT'S SIGNIFICANT TO SOME KNOW HEHAT HOW DO WE WAS IN CHARGE OF IT ALTHOUGH THE KNOW HEHAT HOW DO WE WAS IN CHARGE OF IT ALTHOUGH THE ADMINISTRATION HAS TRIED TO WAS IN CHARGE OF IT ALTHOUGH THE ADMINISTRATION HAS TRIED TO SAY -- ADMINISTRATION HAS TRIED TO SAY -- GWEN: THE COMMUNICATIONS THEY'RE SAY -- GWEN: THE COMMUNICATIONS THEY'RE INTERCEPTED,AVE GWEN: THE COMMUNICATIONS THEY'RE INTERCEPTED,AVE ISN'T THAT THE ASSUMPTION THAT'S INTERCEPTED,AVE ISN'T THAT THE ASSUMPTION THAT'S WHO THEY'RE LISTENING TO?

ISN'T THAT THE ASSUMPTION THAT'S WHO THEY'RE LISTENING TO?

SOURCESVE INTELLIGENCE WHO THEY'RE LISTENING TO?

SOURCESVE INTELLIGENCE TELLING US THEY DON'T HAVE THE SOURCESVE INTELLIGENCE TELLING US THEY DON'T HAVE THE DIRECT CHAIN OF COMMAND UP TO TELLING US THEY DON'T HAVE THE DIRECT CHAIN OF COMMAND UP TO ASSAD HIMSELF BUT THAT THE DIRECT CHAIN OF COMMAND UP TO ASSAD HIMSELF BUT THAT THE CONSIDERINGON IS ASSAD HIMSELF BUT THAT THE CONSIDERINGON IS HIM CULPABLE AND RESPONSIBLE CONSIDERINGON IS HIM CULPABLE AND RESPONSIBLE BECAUSE HE IS STILL THE HIM CULPABLE AND RESPONSIBLE BECAUSE HE IS STILL THE PRESIDENT AND HE IS THE LEADER BECAUSE HE IS STILL THE PRESIDENT AND HE IS THE LEADER REGIME SO THEY FEEL THEY PRESIDENT AND HE IS THE LEADER REGIME SO THEY FEEL THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO HOLD HIM REGIME SO THEY FEEL THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO HOLD HIM RESPONSIBLE.

HAVE THE ABILITY TO HOLD HIM RESPONSIBLE.

TO USTHE PRESIDENT TALKED RESPONSIBLE.

TO USTHE PRESIDENT TALKED AND HAS TALKED A LOT ABOUT TO USTHE PRESIDENT TALKED AND HAS TALKED A LOT ABOUT INTERNATIONAL NORM.

AND HAS TALKED A LOT ABOUT INTERNATIONAL NORM.

WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?

INTERNATIONAL NORM.

WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?

WHAT IS IT ABOUT CHEMICAL WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?

WHAT IS IT ABOUT CHEMICAL WEAPONS THAT ARE SO MUCH MORE A WHAT IS IT ABOUT CHEMICAL WEAPONS THAT ARE SO MUCH MORE A CROSSER THAN THE WEAPONS THAT ARE SO MUCH MORE A CROSSER THAN THE CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS WE'VE SEEN CROSSER THAN THE CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS WE'VE SEEN WHICH HAVE KILLED MANY MORE CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS WE'VE SEEN WHICH HAVE KILLED MANY MORE PEOPLE.

WHICH HAVE KILLED MANY MORE PEOPLE.

>> EVER SINCE WE SAW MUSTARD PEOPLE.

>> EVER SINCE WE SAW MUSTARD GAS, CHLORINE GAS USE IN WORLD >> EVER SINCE WE SAW MUSTARD GAS, CHLORINE GAS USE IN WORLD WAR I, THERE'S BEEN WORLDWIDE GAS, CHLORINE GAS USE IN WORLD WAR I, THERE'S BEEN WORLDWIDE OFULSION AGAINST THE USE WAR I, THERE'S BEEN WORLDWIDE OFULSION AGAINST THE USE THESE WEAPONS AND AN ATTEMPT BY OFULSION AGAINST THE USE THESE WEAPONS AND AN ATTEMPT BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY THESE WEAPONS AND AN ATTEMPT BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY PREVENT IT FROM HAPPENING AGAIN.

THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY PREVENT IT FROM HAPPENING AGAIN.

IN 1993, WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS PREVENT IT FROM HAPPENING AGAIN.

IN 1993, WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT, THERE WAS A CHEMICAL IN 1993, WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT, THERE WAS A CHEMICAL THAT WASONVENTION PRESIDENT, THERE WAS A CHEMICAL THAT WASONVENTION ADOPTED AND WHAT THE THAT WASONVENTION ADOPTED AND WHAT THE ADMINISTRATION DID FACING ADOPTED AND WHAT THE ADMINISTRATION DID FACING PRESSURE LAST YEAR OVER THE ADMINISTRATION DID FACING PRESSURE LAST YEAR OVER THE THE UNITED STATES PRESSURE LAST YEAR OVER THE THE UNITED STATES SYRIA, HAS SAID THAT IN THE UNITED STATES SYRIA, HAS SAID THAT IN MAY NOT BE IN OUR NATIONAL SYRIA, HAS SAID THAT IN MAY NOT BE IN OUR NATIONAL INTERESTS BUT IF THAT RED LINE MAY NOT BE IN OUR NATIONAL INTERESTS BUT IF THAT RED LINE SOMETHING THEAT'S INTERESTS BUT IF THAT RED LINE SOMETHING THEAT'S UNITED STATES COULD NOT IGNORE SOMETHING THEAT'S UNITED STATES COULD NOT IGNORE AND THAT'S THE NORM THE UNITED STATES COULD NOT IGNORE AND THAT'S THE NORM THE TALKING ABOUT AND AND THAT'S THE NORM THE TALKING ABOUT AND I HAVE TO SAY IN YOUR INTERVIEW TALKING ABOUT AND I HAVE TO SAY IN YOUR INTERVIEW WITH JUDY, THAT WAS THE LEAST I HAVE TO SAY IN YOUR INTERVIEW WITH JUDY, THAT WAS THE LEAST HAVE NOT MADE A WITH JUDY, THAT WAS THE LEAST HAVE NOT MADE A DECISION THAT I HAVE HEARD IN A HAVE NOT MADE A DECISION THAT I HAVE HEARD IN A LONG TIME AND WE SAW CERTAINLY DECISION THAT I HAVE HEARD IN A LONG TIME AND WE SAW CERTAINLY EMOTION OF JOHN KERRY LONG TIME AND WE SAW CERTAINLY EMOTION OF JOHN KERRY AT THE BEGINNING OF THE WEEK AND EMOTION OF JOHN KERRY AT THE BEGINNING OF THE WEEK AND AT THE END OF THE WEEK, THEY AT THE BEGINNING OF THE WEEK AND AT THE END OF THE WEEK, THEY INTEND TO DO SOMETHING.

AT THE END OF THE WEEK, THEY INTEND TO DO SOMETHING.

EN: LET'S LISTEN MORE TO JOHN INTEND TO DO SOMETHING.

EN: LET'S LISTEN MORE TO JOHN KERRY FROM TODAY.

EN: LET'S LISTEN MORE TO JOHN KERRY FROM TODAY.

WE HEARD HIM AT THE STATE KERRY FROM TODAY.

WE HEARD HIM AT THE STATE ANARTMENT IN WHICH HE MADE WE HEARD HIM AT THE STATE ANARTMENT IN WHICH HE MADE EXPANSIVE AND EMOTIONAL CASE.

ANARTMENT IN WHICH HE MADE EXPANSIVE AND EMOTIONAL CASE.

>> WE KNOW WHERE THE ROCKETS EXPANSIVE AND EMOTIONAL CASE.

>> WE KNOW WHERE THE ROCKETS LAUNCHED FROM AND AT WHAT >> WE KNOW WHERE THE ROCKETS LAUNCHED FROM AND AT WHAT TIME.

LAUNCHED FROM AND AT WHAT TIME.

LANDED ANDRE THEY TIME.

LANDED ANDRE THEY WHEN.

LANDED ANDRE THEY WHEN.

WE KNOW ROCKETS CAME ONLY FROM WHEN.

WE KNOW ROCKETS CAME ONLY FROM REGIME CONTROLLED AREAS AND WENT WE KNOW ROCKETS CAME ONLY FROM REGIME CONTROLLED AREAS AND WENT TO OPPOSITION CONTROLLED OR REGIME CONTROLLED AREAS AND WENT TO OPPOSITION CONTROLLED OR CONTESTED NEIGHBORHOODS.

TO OPPOSITION CONTROLLED OR CONTESTED NEIGHBORHOODS.

THAT, WE SAW THE CONTESTED NEIGHBORHOODS.

THAT, WE SAW THE PRESIDENT COME INTO THE BRIEFING THAT, WE SAW THE PRESIDENT COME INTO THE BRIEFING THE CABINETALLY, PRESIDENT COME INTO THE BRIEFING THE CABINETALLY, ROOM, TO MEET WITH SOME FOREIGN THE CABINETALLY, ROOM, TO MEET WITH SOME FOREIGN WAS SO AND IN HIS TONE ROOM, TO MEET WITH SOME FOREIGN WAS SO AND IN HIS TONE MUCH MORE DIFFERENT FROM KERRY'S WAS SO AND IN HIS TONE MUCH MORE DIFFERENT FROM KERRY'S TONE.

MUCH MORE DIFFERENT FROM KERRY'S TONE.

LET'S LISTEN TO THAT AND THEN TONE.

LET'S LISTEN TO THAT AND THEN TALK.

LET'S LISTEN TO THAT AND THEN TALK.

>> WE'RE NOT CONSIDERING ANY TALK.

>> WE'RE NOT CONSIDERING ANY OPEN-ENDED COMMITMENT.

>> WE'RE NOT CONSIDERING ANY OPEN-ENDED COMMITMENT.

CONSIDERING ANY BOOTS OPEN-ENDED COMMITMENT.

CONSIDERING ANY BOOTS ON THE GROUND APPROACH.

CONSIDERING ANY BOOTS ON THE GROUND APPROACH.

CONSIDERILL DO IS ON THE GROUND APPROACH.

CONSIDERILL DO IS OPTIONS THAT MEET THE NARROW CONSIDERILL DO IS OPTIONS THAT MEET THE NARROW CONCERN AROUND CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

OPTIONS THAT MEET THE NARROW CONCERN AROUND CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

THAT THERE'S NOT CONCERN AROUND CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

THAT THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A SOLELY MILITARY THAT THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A SOLELY MILITARY THE UNDERLYING GOING TO BE A SOLELY MILITARY THE UNDERLYING CONFLICT AND TRAGEDY THAT'S THE UNDERLYING CONFLICT AND TRAGEDY THAT'S TAKING PLACE IN SYRIA.

CONFLICT AND TRAGEDY THAT'S TAKING PLACE IN SYRIA.

PRESIDENT IS TALKING TAKING PLACE IN SYRIA.

PRESIDENT IS TALKING NARROW, LIMITED, NO BOOTS ON THE PRESIDENT IS TALKING NARROW, LIMITED, NO BOOTS ON THE GROUND.

NARROW, LIMITED, NO BOOTS ON THE GROUND.

HE SAID IT TWICE.

GROUND.

HE SAID IT TWICE.

IT'S A VERY DIFFERENT TONE HE SAID IT TWICE.

IT'S A VERY DIFFERENT TONE BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND IT'S A VERY DIFFERENT TONE BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE WHITE HOUSE.

BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE WHITE HOUSE.

WHY IS THAT?

THE WHITE HOUSE.

WHY IS THAT?

IT'S THE NATURE WHY IS THAT?

IT'S THE NATURE OF THIS PRESIDENT'S PERSONALITY.

IT'S THE NATURE OF THIS PRESIDENT'S PERSONALITY.

FIGURE.ORE RESTRAINED OF THIS PRESIDENT'S PERSONALITY.

FIGURE.ORE RESTRAINED IT'S NOT HIS NATURE TO BE FIGURE.ORE RESTRAINED IT'S NOT HIS NATURE TO BE BELLICOSE.

IT'S NOT HIS NATURE TO BE BELLICOSE.

THAT, THE OTHER LINE BELLICOSE.

THAT, THE OTHER LINE HE SAID WHICH I THINK IS VERY THAT, THE OTHER LINE HE SAID WHICH I THINK IS VERY IMPORTANT, HE SAID EVERYBODY HE SAID WHICH I THINK IS VERY IMPORTANT, HE SAID EVERYBODY KNOWS SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE IMPORTANT, HE SAID EVERYBODY KNOWS SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE BUT NOBODY WANTS TO DO IT AND KNOWS SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE BUT NOBODY WANTS TO DO IT AND YOU FELT AT THAT MOMENT HE WAS BUT NOBODY WANTS TO DO IT AND YOU FELT AT THAT MOMENT HE WAS BIT ABOUTLITTLE YOU FELT AT THAT MOMENT HE WAS BIT ABOUTLITTLE HIMSELF.

BIT ABOUTLITTLE HIMSELF.

THIS IS SOMETHING HE DID NOT HIMSELF.

THIS IS SOMETHING HE DID NOT COME INTO OFFICE TO DO.

THIS IS SOMETHING HE DID NOT COME INTO OFFICE TO DO.

CAME INTO OFFICE TO GET US COME INTO OFFICE TO DO.

CAME INTO OFFICE TO GET US OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST, NOT HAVE CAME INTO OFFICE TO GET US OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST, NOT HAVE A NEW ONE.

OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST, NOT HAVE A NEW ONE.

THE PRESSURE AND A NEW ONE.

THE PRESSURE AND RESPONSIBILITY TO DO IT BUT IS THE PRESSURE AND RESPONSIBILITY TO DO IT BUT IS NOT EXCITED ABOUT IT.

RESPONSIBILITY TO DO IT BUT IS NOT EXCITED ABOUT IT.

BRIMMING WITH NOT EXCITED ABOUT IT.

BRIMMING WITH INDIGNATION, FILLED WITH OUTRAGE BRIMMING WITH INDIGNATION, FILLED WITH OUTRAGE OVER THE EVENTS WE WITNESSED IN INDIGNATION, FILLED WITH OUTRAGE OVER THE EVENTS WE WITNESSED IN BUT YOU DON'T HEAR THAT OVER THE EVENTS WE WITNESSED IN BUT YOU DON'T HEAR THAT FROM THE PRESIDENT AT THIS BUT YOU DON'T HEAR THAT FROM THE PRESIDENT AT THIS POINT.

FROM THE PRESIDENT AT THIS POINT.

GWEN: I HAVE A THIS YEAR.

POINT.

GWEN: I HAVE A THIS YEAR.

GO AHEAD, JOHN.

GWEN: I HAVE A THIS YEAR.

GO AHEAD, JOHN.

DO THINK THEY HAD DIFFERENT GO AHEAD, JOHN.

DO THINK THEY HAD DIFFERENT MISSIONS IN THEIR SPEECHES.

DO THINK THEY HAD DIFFERENT MISSIONS IN THEIR SPEECHES.

JOHN KERRY WAS TRYING TO MISSIONS IN THEIR SPEECHES.

JOHN KERRY WAS TRYING TO GALVANIZE WORLD OPINION, JOHN KERRY WAS TRYING TO GALVANIZE WORLD OPINION, AMERICAN OPINION TO SOME DEGREE, GALVANIZE WORLD OPINION, AMERICAN OPINION TO SOME DEGREE, AND MAKE THE CASE, BUT PRESIDENT AMERICAN OPINION TO SOME DEGREE, AND MAKE THE CASE, BUT PRESIDENT OBAMA, WHO AFTER ALL, IS THE ONE AND MAKE THE CASE, BUT PRESIDENT OBAMA, WHO AFTER ALL, IS THE ONE WHO WAS ELECTED NATIONALLY.

OBAMA, WHO AFTER ALL, IS THE ONE WHO WAS ELECTED NATIONALLY.

WAS NOT ELECTED WHO WAS ELECTED NATIONALLY.

WAS NOT ELECTED PRESIDENT, WANTED TO BE.

WAS NOT ELECTED PRESIDENT, WANTED TO BE.

GWEN: HE LOOKED PRESIDENTIAL PRESIDENT, WANTED TO BE.

GWEN: HE LOOKED PRESIDENTIAL TODAY, THOUGH.

GWEN: HE LOOKED PRESIDENTIAL TODAY, THOUGH.

BUT PRESIDENT OBAMA WAS THE TODAY, THOUGH.

BUT PRESIDENT OBAMA WAS THE ONE WHO NEEDED TO REASSURE BUT PRESIDENT OBAMA WAS THE ONE WHO NEEDED TO REASSURE PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR HIM THAT HE ONE WHO NEEDED TO REASSURE PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR HIM THAT HE THIS IN A VERY PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR HIM THAT HE THIS IN A VERY LIMITED WAY AND VERY RELUCTANTLY THIS IN A VERY LIMITED WAY AND VERY RELUCTANTLY AT PUBLICEN YOU LOOK LIMITED WAY AND VERY RELUCTANTLY AT PUBLICEN YOU LOOK OPINION AND WE HAD THIS NBC NEWS AT PUBLICEN YOU LOOK OPINION AND WE HAD THIS NBC NEWS POLL YOU REFERRED TO EARLIER, OPINION AND WE HAD THIS NBC NEWS POLL YOU REFERRED TO EARLIER, PEOPLE GET INTO POLL YOU REFERRED TO EARLIER, PEOPLE GET INTO THIS CONFLICT AND HE'S TRYING TO PEOPLE GET INTO THIS CONFLICT AND HE'S TRYING TO GOINGON'T WORRY, IT'S NOT THIS CONFLICT AND HE'S TRYING TO GOINGON'T WORRY, IT'S NOT TO BE ANOTHER IRAQ.

GOINGON'T WORRY, IT'S NOT TO BE ANOTHER IRAQ.

GWEN: THAT IS EXACTLY MY THEORY, TO BE ANOTHER IRAQ.

GWEN: THAT IS EXACTLY MY THEORY, TO TWO MEN WERE SPEAKING GWEN: THAT IS EXACTLY MY THEORY, TO TWO MEN WERE SPEAKING DIFFERENT AUDIENCES.

TO TWO MEN WERE SPEAKING DIFFERENT AUDIENCES.

JOHN BOEHNER -- JOHN KERRY WAS DIFFERENT AUDIENCES.

JOHN BOEHNER -- JOHN KERRY WAS SPEAKING TO THE WAVERING JOHN BOEHNER -- JOHN KERRY WAS SPEAKING TO THE WAVERING INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ESPECIALLY SPEAKING TO THE WAVERING INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ESPECIALLY AFTER WHAT HAPPENED IN LONDON, INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT ESPECIALLY AFTER WHAT HAPPENED IN LONDON, AND THE PRESIDENT WAS SPEAKING AFTER WHAT HAPPENED IN LONDON, AND THE PRESIDENT WAS SPEAKING TO WAVERING OR NEVER THEREAS W AND THE PRESIDENT WAS SPEAKING TO WAVERING OR NEVER THEREAS W DOMESTIC SUPPORT.

TO WAVERING OR NEVER THEREAS W DOMESTIC SUPPORT.

>> I TOTALLY AGREE.

DOMESTIC SUPPORT.

>> I TOTALLY AGREE.

PRESIDENT, THAT'S >> I TOTALLY AGREE.

PRESIDENT, THAT'S HIS PERSONALITY TO BE SOBER, PRESIDENT, THAT'S HIS PERSONALITY TO BE SOBER, I'M THED TO SAY, HIS PERSONALITY TO BE SOBER, I'M THED TO SAY, DECISION MAKER HERE AND I HAVE I'M THED TO SAY, DECISION MAKER HERE AND I HAVE TO THINK IT THROUGH AND GRAPPLE DECISION MAKER HERE AND I HAVE TO THINK IT THROUGH AND GRAPPLE WITH THESE REALLY TOUGH ISSUES TO THINK IT THROUGH AND GRAPPLE WITH THESE REALLY TOUGH ISSUES AND THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME WITH THESE REALLY TOUGH ISSUES AND THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME HE'S PUT HIS SECRETARY OF STATE AND THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME HE'S PUT HIS SECRETARY OF STATE OUT TO BE THE EMOTIONAL ONE.

HE'S PUT HIS SECRETARY OF STATE OUT TO BE THE EMOTIONAL ONE.

REMEMBER BENGHAZI?

OUT TO BE THE EMOTIONAL ONE.

REMEMBER BENGHAZI?

IT WAS HILLARY CLINTON WHO WAS REMEMBER BENGHAZI?

IT WAS HILLARY CLINTON WHO WAS STREAMINGWITH TEARS IT WAS HILLARY CLINTON WHO WAS STREAMINGWITH TEARS DOWN HER EYES WHEN THE CASKETS STREAMINGWITH TEARS DOWN HER EYES WHEN THE CASKETS ANDREWS AIR FORCE DOWN HER EYES WHEN THE CASKETS ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE AND IT WAS OBAMA WHO WAS ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE AND IT WAS OBAMA WHO WAS STIFF AND SERIOUS AND FEELING BASE AND IT WAS OBAMA WHO WAS STIFF AND SERIOUS AND FEELING EVERYTHING SO I STIFF AND SERIOUS AND FEELING EVERYTHING SO I SAW ECHOES OF THAT, ALLOWING THE EVERYTHING SO I SAW ECHOES OF THAT, ALLOWING THE SECRETARY OF STATE TO BE THE ONE SAW ECHOES OF THAT, ALLOWING THE SECRETARY OF STATE TO BE THE ONE EMOTION FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE TO BE THE ONE EMOTION FOR THE NATION, FOR THE WORLD AND MAKING EMOTION FOR THE NATION, FOR THE WORLD AND MAKING THIS HUMANITARIAN CASE.

NATION, FOR THE WORLD AND MAKING THIS HUMANITARIAN CASE.

SOMETHINGGO BACK TO THIS HUMANITARIAN CASE.

SOMETHINGGO BACK TO YOU SAID ABOUT LEGALITY WITH SOMETHINGGO BACK TO YOU SAID ABOUT LEGALITY WITH JOHN.

YOU SAID ABOUT LEGALITY WITH JOHN.

UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW, UNDER JOHN.

UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW, UNDER ESTABLISHED INTERNATIONAL LAW, UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW, UNDER ESTABLISHED INTERNATIONAL LAW, IS NOT ACTUALLY LEGAL TO ESTABLISHED INTERNATIONAL LAW, IS NOT ACTUALLY LEGAL TO STRIKE SYRIA EVEN FOR THIS IS NOT ACTUALLY LEGAL TO STRIKE SYRIA EVEN FOR THIS WEAPONS VIOLATION STRIKE SYRIA EVEN FOR THIS WEAPONS VIOLATION UNLESS THERE'S A U.N.

WEAPONS VIOLATION UNLESS THERE'S A U.N.

AUTHORIZATION OR IT'S IN SELF UNLESS THERE'S A U.N.

AUTHORIZATION OR IT'S IN SELF DEFENSE.

AUTHORIZATION OR IT'S IN SELF DEFENSE.

U.N.

AUTHORIZATION IS NOT GOING DEFENSE.

U.N.

AUTHORIZATION IS NOT GOING TO COME BECAUSE RUSSIA WILL U.N.

AUTHORIZATION IS NOT GOING TO COME BECAUSE RUSSIA WILL THE SELF DEFENSE, TO COME BECAUSE RUSSIA WILL THE SELF DEFENSE, WE CAN'T ARGUE SELF DEFENSE THE SELF DEFENSE, WE CAN'T ARGUE SELF DEFENSE BECAUSE THERE WERE NO AMERICANS WE CAN'T ARGUE SELF DEFENSE BECAUSE THERE WERE NO AMERICANS NOTHING AND THERE IS BECAUSE THERE WERE NO AMERICANS NOTHING AND THERE IS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW THAT NOTHING AND THERE IS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW THAT ALLOWS COLLECTIVE SELF DEFENSE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW THAT ALLOWS COLLECTIVE SELF DEFENSE WHO WEREFERENT PEOPLE ALLOWS COLLECTIVE SELF DEFENSE WHO WEREFERENT PEOPLE ATTACKED BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT WHO WEREFERENT PEOPLE ATTACKED BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT SO THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SAY WE ATTACKED BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT SO THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SAY WE CHANGE INTERNATIONAL LAW SO THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SAY WE CHANGE INTERNATIONAL LAW TO ALLOW FOR THE RESPONSIBILITY CHANGE INTERNATIONAL LAW TO ALLOW FOR THE RESPONSIBILITY DOESN'T EXIST IT TO ALLOW FOR THE RESPONSIBILITY DOESN'T EXIST IT YET.

DOESN'T EXIST IT YET.

>> THAT'S WHY JOHN KERRY SAID YET.

>> THAT'S WHY JOHN KERRY SAID -- THREATE'S A THROAT >> THAT'S WHY JOHN KERRY SAID -- THREATE'S A THROAT TO ISRAEL, TURKEY, JORDAN, THAT -- THREATE'S A THROAT TO ISRAEL, TURKEY, JORDAN, THAT IS A THREAT BEYOND HIS OWN TO ISRAEL, TURKEY, JORDAN, THAT IS A THREAT BEYOND HIS OWN BORDERS.

IS A THREAT BEYOND HIS OWN BORDERS.

GWEN: THE PRESIDENT HAS SAID BORDERS.

GWEN: THE PRESIDENT HAS SAID BE A THREAT TO GWEN: THE PRESIDENT HAS SAID BE A THREAT TO US, COULD BE.

BE A THREAT TO US, COULD BE.

>> THAT'S A CRITICAL ELEMENT, BE US, COULD BE.

>> THAT'S A CRITICAL ELEMENT, BE HE MADE THE POINT IN >> THAT'S A CRITICAL ELEMENT, BE HE MADE THE POINT IN THE INTERVIEW WITH YOU AND ALSO HE MADE THE POINT IN THE INTERVIEW WITH YOU AND ALSO TODAY, HE'S TRYING TO TELL THE THE INTERVIEW WITH YOU AND ALSO TODAY, HE'S TRYING TO TELL THE YES, THIS ISLE, TODAY, HE'S TRYING TO TELL THE YES, THIS ISLE, BAD, THIS IS A HUMANITARIAN YES, THIS ISLE, BAD, THIS IS A HUMANITARIAN CRISIS BUT I'M NOT DOING IT JUST BAD, THIS IS A HUMANITARIAN CRISIS BUT I'M NOT DOING IT JUST FOR THAT.

CRISIS BUT I'M NOT DOING IT JUST FOR THAT.

FOR YOU, I'M DOING FOR THAT.

FOR YOU, I'M DOING IT FOR US AS A COUNTRY AND FOR YOU, I'M DOING IT FOR US AS A COUNTRY AND THAT'S A CRITICAL DISTINCTION HE IT FOR US AS A COUNTRY AND THAT'S A CRITICAL DISTINCTION HE DRIVE HOME.

THAT'S A CRITICAL DISTINCTION HE DRIVE HOME.

GWEN: BECAUSE HE DOESN'T THINK DRIVE HOME.

GWEN: BECAUSE HE DOESN'T THINK THERE'S A MORAL CASE TO BE MADE GWEN: BECAUSE HE DOESN'T THINK THERE'S A MORAL CASE TO BE MADE PERSUASIVE?

THERE'S A MORAL CASE TO BE MADE PERSUASIVE?

>> HE KNOWS THERE'S A MORAL CASE PERSUASIVE?

>> HE KNOWS THERE'S A MORAL CASE NOT'S PERSUASIVE BUT THAT'S >> HE KNOWS THERE'S A MORAL CASE NOT'S PERSUASIVE BUT THAT'S LAW.

NOT'S PERSUASIVE BUT THAT'S LAW.

REMEMBER IN 1999 AND KOSOVO, LAW.

REMEMBER IN 1999 AND KOSOVO, CORRIDORS,N THE BACK REMEMBER IN 1999 AND KOSOVO, CORRIDORS,N THE BACK ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS HAVE CORRIDORS,N THE BACK ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS HAVE PARALLELING THE KOSOVO ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS HAVE PARALLELING THE KOSOVO ON US.

PARALLELING THE KOSOVO ON US.

I LOOKED WHACK -- BACK AND ON US.

I LOOKED WHACK -- BACK AND DIDN'T ASSERT A I LOOKED WHACK -- BACK AND DIDN'T ASSERT A LEGAL CASE IN 1999.

DIDN'T ASSERT A LEGAL CASE IN 1999.

THEY ASSERTED A MORAL, LEGAL CASE IN 1999.

THEY ASSERTED A MORAL, HUMANITARIAN CASE BUT DIDN'T THEY ASSERTED A MORAL, HUMANITARIAN CASE BUT DIDN'T WANT TO SET A LEGAL PRECEDENT.

HUMANITARIAN CASE BUT DIDN'T WANT TO SET A LEGAL PRECEDENT.

HE DREW A RED LINE AND WHEN YOU WANT TO SET A LEGAL PRECEDENT.

HE DREW A RED LINE AND WHEN YOU DO THAT YOU PAINT YOURSELF IN A HE DREW A RED LINE AND WHEN YOU DO THAT YOU PAINT YOURSELF IN A CORNER.

DO THAT YOU PAINT YOURSELF IN A CORNER.

HAS TO ACT.

CORNER.

HAS TO ACT.

>> THE OTHER QUESTION ABOUT HIS HAS TO ACT.

>> THE OTHER QUESTION ABOUT HIS TONE AT THIS POINT -- AND HE >> THE OTHER QUESTION ABOUT HIS TONE AT THIS POINT -- AND HE WILL SPEAK IF AND WHEN HE TONE AT THIS POINT -- AND HE WILL SPEAK IF AND WHEN HE DOES -- WE MIGHT HEAR A WILL SPEAK IF AND WHEN HE DOES -- WE MIGHT HEAR A DIFFERENT TONE.

DOES -- WE MIGHT HEAR A DIFFERENT TONE.

THE TONE HE'S OFFERED SO FAR HAS DIFFERENT TONE.

THE TONE HE'S OFFERED SO FAR HAS CRITICISM THAT HE IS THE TONE HE'S OFFERED SO FAR HAS CRITICISM THAT HE IS SENDING A REALLY BAD MESSAGE TO CRITICISM THAT HE IS SENDING A REALLY BAD MESSAGE TO ASSAD SAYING, LOOK, IT'S NOT SENDING A REALLY BAD MESSAGE TO ASSAD SAYING, LOOK, IT'S NOT BIG A DEAL, JUST ONE DAY, ASSAD SAYING, LOOK, IT'S NOT BIG A DEAL, JUST ONE DAY, IT WILL HURT ME MORE THAN IT BIG A DEAL, JUST ONE DAY, IT WILL HURT ME MORE THAN IT QUESTION AND THE IT WILL HURT ME MORE THAN IT QUESTION AND THE PEOPLE ARE RAISING IS HOW QUESTION AND THE PEOPLE ARE RAISING IS HOW EFFECTIVE THEREFORE IS THAT PEOPLE ARE RAISING IS HOW EFFECTIVE THEREFORE IS THAT SONG TO BE IF WE SEEM EFFECTIVE THEREFORE IS THAT SONG TO BE IF WE SEEM RELUCTANT AND SO RESTRAINED IN SONG TO BE IF WE SEEM RELUCTANT AND SO RESTRAINED IN OUR RESPONSE.

RELUCTANT AND SO RESTRAINED IN OUR RESPONSE.

ON SOMETHINGTED OUR RESPONSE.

ON SOMETHINGTED I'M CURIOUS ABOUT.

ON SOMETHINGTED I'M CURIOUS ABOUT.

WHAT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT?

I'M CURIOUS ABOUT.

WHAT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT?

SENT FROM OFFS WHAT ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT?

SENT FROM OFFS SHORE, DRONES?

SENT FROM OFFS SHORE, DRONES?

ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT SHORE, DRONES?

ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT ONE-DAY, TWO-DAY, ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT ONE-DAY, TWO-DAY, THREE-DAY ACTION?

ONE-DAY, TWO-DAY, THREE-DAY ACTION?

WHAT'S ON THE TABLE?

THREE-DAY ACTION?

WHAT'S ON THE TABLE?

LOOKING MOST LIKELY AT WHAT'S ON THE TABLE?

LOOKING MOST LIKELY AT A ONE-DAY STRIKE WITH CRUISE LOOKING MOST LIKELY AT A ONE-DAY STRIKE WITH CRUISE CROSS INTOO AIRPLANE A ONE-DAY STRIKE WITH CRUISE CROSS INTOO AIRPLANE AIRSCEPA THAT MIGHT BE SHOT CROSS INTOO AIRPLANE AIRSCEPA THAT MIGHT BE SHOT DOWN, NO BOOTS ON THE GROUND.

AIRSCEPA THAT MIGHT BE SHOT DOWN, NO BOOTS ON THE GROUND.

SEEN THIS ACTION BEFORE DOWN, NO BOOTS ON THE GROUND.

SEEN THIS ACTION BEFORE UNDER CLINTON, UNDER REAGAN, THE SEEN THIS ACTION BEFORE UNDER CLINTON, UNDER REAGAN, THE OFITED, ONE-DAY KIND UNDER CLINTON, UNDER REAGAN, THE OFITED, ONE-DAY KIND APPROACH AND I THINK THEY'LL, OFITED, ONE-DAY KIND APPROACH AND I THINK THEY'LL, AFTER A DAY, LOOK AND SEE IF APPROACH AND I THINK THEY'LL, AFTER A DAY, LOOK AND SEE IF ACHIEVED WHAT THEY WANTED AFTER A DAY, LOOK AND SEE IF ACHIEVED WHAT THEY WANTED TO AND IT'S POSSIBLE THEY COULD ACHIEVED WHAT THEY WANTED TO AND IT'S POSSIBLE THEY COULD RESUME IT AGAIN.

TO AND IT'S POSSIBLE THEY COULD RESUME IT AGAIN.

I ALSO THINK, BECAUSE OF THE RESUME IT AGAIN.

I ALSO THINK, BECAUSE OF THE SENSITIVITY YOU MENTIONED, WHAT I ALSO THINK, BECAUSE OF THE SENSITIVITY YOU MENTIONED, WHAT DOING, IT'S GOING SENSITIVITY YOU MENTIONED, WHAT DOING, IT'S GOING TO HURT ME MORE THAN IT HURTS DOING, IT'S GOING TO HURT ME MORE THAN IT HURTS YOU, IT'S LIKELY THAT ONE DAY TO HURT ME MORE THAN IT HURTS YOU, IT'S LIKELY THAT ONE DAY BE AN INTENSE ONE DAY YOU, IT'S LIKELY THAT ONE DAY BE AN INTENSE ONE DAY THAT'S HEAVY DUTY.

BE AN INTENSE ONE DAY THAT'S HEAVY DUTY.

GWEN: WHY IS BRITAIN NOT ON THAT'S HEAVY DUTY.

GWEN: WHY IS BRITAIN NOT ON BOARD AND WHY IS FRANCE ON GWEN: WHY IS BRITAIN NOT ON BOARD AND WHY IS FRANCE ON BOARD?

BOARD AND WHY IS FRANCE ON BOARD?

THIS IS FUNNY.

BOARD?

THIS IS FUNNY.

TOMORROW MORNING'S HEADLINE OF THIS IS FUNNY.

TOMORROW MORNING'S HEADLINE OF "SUN," ONE OF THE GREAT TOMORROW MORNING'S HEADLINE OF "SUN," ONE OF THE GREAT IS "END OF THES, "SUN," ONE OF THE GREAT IS "END OF THES, SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP."

IS "END OF THES, SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP."

>> KERRY CAME OUT AND SAID SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP."

>> KERRY CAME OUT AND SAID IS OUR OLDEST FRIEND.

>> KERRY CAME OUT AND SAID IS OUR OLDEST FRIEND.

>> PEOPLE HAVE BEEN JOKING THAT IS OUR OLDEST FRIEND.

>> PEOPLE HAVE BEEN JOKING THAT FRIES CAN BE CALLED >> PEOPLE HAVE BEEN JOKING THAT FRIES CAN BE CALLED MUFFINSGAIN BUT ENGLISH FRIES CAN BE CALLED MUFFINSGAIN BUT ENGLISH WILL BE CALLED FREEDOM MUFFINS.

MUFFINSGAIN BUT ENGLISH WILL BE CALLED FREEDOM MUFFINS.

THAT WAS AN EFFORT TO SAY WILL BE CALLED FREEDOM MUFFINS.

THAT WAS AN EFFORT TO SAY WE UNDERSTAND THE POLITICAL THAT WAS AN EFFORT TO SAY WE UNDERSTAND THE POLITICAL PRESSURE YOU'RE UNDER BUT THE WE UNDERSTAND THE POLITICAL PRESSURE YOU'RE UNDER BUT THE ISITICAL PRESSURE CAMERON PRESSURE YOU'RE UNDER BUT THE ISITICAL PRESSURE CAMERON UNDER HAS BEEN INCREDIBLE ISITICAL PRESSURE CAMERON UNDER HAS BEEN INCREDIBLE BECAUSE IT'S BEEN MORE THAN 150 UNDER HAS BEEN INCREDIBLE BECAUSE IT'S BEEN MORE THAN 150 BRITISH PRIME BECAUSE IT'S BEEN MORE THAN 150 BRITISH PRIME MINISTER LOSS THIS KIND OF A BRITISH PRIME MINISTER LOSS THIS KIND OF A PARLIAMENTARY MOTION FOR MINISTER LOSS THIS KIND OF A PARLIAMENTARY MOTION FOR MILITARYNG THE USE OF PARLIAMENTARY MOTION FOR MILITARYNG THE USE OF FORCE SO IT'S A BIG DEFEAT FOR MILITARYNG THE USE OF FORCE SO IT'S A BIG DEFEAT FOR HIM BUT THAT'S PARTLY BECAUSE OF FORCE SO IT'S A BIG DEFEAT FOR HIM BUT THAT'S PARTLY BECAUSE OF OF IRAQ HANGING HIM BUT THAT'S PARTLY BECAUSE OF OF IRAQ HANGING OVER, PEOPLE WANTING EVIDENCE.

OF IRAQ HANGING OVER, PEOPLE WANTING EVIDENCE.

>> AND THE SPECTER AMONG THE OVER, PEOPLE WANTING EVIDENCE.

>> AND THE SPECTER AMONG THE COUNTRYPUBLIC OF A >> AND THE SPECTER AMONG THE COUNTRYPUBLIC OF A HAVING BEEN LED BY THE UNITED COUNTRYPUBLIC OF A HAVING BEEN LED BY THE UNITED STATES INTO SOMETHING -- HAVING BEEN LED BY THE UNITED STATES INTO SOMETHING -- WAR WEARY, WHEREAS THE FRENCH STATES INTO SOMETHING -- WAR WEARY, WHEREAS THE FRENCH DID NOT GET CARRIED IN ON IRAQ.

WAR WEARY, WHEREAS THE FRENCH DID NOT GET CARRIED IN ON IRAQ.

A GENERATION SINCE DID NOT GET CARRIED IN ON IRAQ.

A GENERATION SINCE WE WENT TO WAR WITHOUT BRITAIN A GENERATION SINCE WE WENT TO WAR WITHOUT BRITAIN IF WE ASKED THEM TO.

WE WENT TO WAR WITHOUT BRITAIN IF WE ASKED THEM TO.

THEY DIDN'T GO WITH US IN IF WE ASKED THEM TO.

THEY DIDN'T GO WITH US IN VIETNAM BUT EVERY OTHER THEY DIDN'T GO WITH US IN VIETNAM BUT EVERY OTHER INSTANCE.

VIETNAM BUT EVERY OTHER INSTANCE.

>> WHERE IS THE UNITED NATIONS INSTANCE.

>> WHERE IS THE UNITED NATIONS ON THIS?

>> WHERE IS THE UNITED NATIONS ON THIS?

THAT'S USUALLY WHERE WE PUNT IT ON THIS?

THAT'S USUALLY WHERE WE PUNT IT TO.

THAT'S USUALLY WHERE WE PUNT IT TO.

HERE TONIGHT AFTER TO.

HERE TONIGHT AFTER 8:00 EASTERN TIME, THE U.N.

HERE TONIGHT AFTER 8:00 EASTERN TIME, THE U.N.

INSPECTORS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE 8:00 EASTERN TIME, THE U.N.

INSPECTORS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE SATURDAY MORNING INSPECTORS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE SATURDAY MORNING AT WHICH TIME WE PRESUME SATURDAY MORNING AT WHICH TIME WE PRESUME SOMETHING WILL HAPPEN BUT THEN AT WHICH TIME WE PRESUME SOMETHING WILL HAPPEN BUT THEN THE IS THE TIME LINE FOR SOMETHING WILL HAPPEN BUT THEN THE IS THE TIME LINE FOR U.N.

INSPECTORS?

THE IS THE TIME LINE FOR U.N.

INSPECTORS?

>> JUST BEFORE WE WENT TO AIR, U.N.

INSPECTORS?

>> JUST BEFORE WE WENT TO AIR, RUSSIA ISLD THAT >> JUST BEFORE WE WENT TO AIR, RUSSIA ISLD THAT CALLING FOR A SPECIAL MEETING OF RUSSIA ISLD THAT CALLING FOR A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL THIS CALLING FOR A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL THIS WEEKEND SO RUSSIA HAS ALREADY THE SECURITY COUNCIL THIS WEEKEND SO RUSSIA HAS ALREADY PUBLICLY DENOUNCED ANY KIND OF WEEKEND SO RUSSIA HAS ALREADY PUBLICLY DENOUNCED ANY KIND OF POSSIBLE MILITARY ACTION.

PUBLICLY DENOUNCED ANY KIND OF POSSIBLE MILITARY ACTION.

TRYING TO DO WHATEVER POSSIBLE MILITARY ACTION.

TRYING TO DO WHATEVER THEY CAN TO BLOCK IT FROM TRYING TO DO WHATEVER THEY CAN TO BLOCK IT FROM HAPPENING, TRYING TO KEEP THE THEY CAN TO BLOCK IT FROM HAPPENING, TRYING TO KEEP THE COUNCIL PROCESS HAPPENING, TRYING TO KEEP THE COUNCIL PROCESS ALIVE TO FORESTALL ACTION.

COUNCIL PROCESS ALIVE TO FORESTALL ACTION.

WE KNOW THE ADMINISTRATION HAS ALIVE TO FORESTALL ACTION.

WE KNOW THE ADMINISTRATION HAS CLEAR THAT THEY CAN GO WE KNOW THE ADMINISTRATION HAS CLEAR THAT THEY CAN GO WITHOUT THE U.N. SECURITY CLEAR THAT THEY CAN GO WITHOUT THE U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL.

WITHOUT THE U.N. SECURITY COUNCIL.

THEY FEEL THEY DON'T NEED THE COUNCIL.

THEY FEEL THEY DON'T NEED THE DON'T NEED BRITAIN.

THEY FEEL THEY DON'T NEED THE DON'T NEED BRITAIN.

>> WHICH IS USEFUL WHEN YOU KNOW DON'T NEED BRITAIN.

>> WHICH IS USEFUL WHEN YOU KNOW YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET IT.

>> WHICH IS USEFUL WHEN YOU KNOW YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET IT.

>> EXACTLY.

YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET IT.

>> EXACTLY.

WE KNOW RUSSIA WILL TRY TO BUY >> EXACTLY.

WE KNOW RUSSIA WILL TRY TO BUY TIME AND TRY TO MAKE THE WE KNOW RUSSIA WILL TRY TO BUY TIME AND TRY TO MAKE THE ARGUMENT AND THEY HAVE CERTAIN TIME AND TRY TO MAKE THE ARGUMENT AND THEY HAVE CERTAIN WHO AREEHIND THEM ARGUMENT AND THEY HAVE CERTAIN WHO AREEHIND THEM IMPORTANT PEOPLE -- THE U.N. WHO AREEHIND THEM IMPORTANT PEOPLE -- THE U.N. SECRETARY GENERAL BAN KI-MOON, IMPORTANT PEOPLE -- THE U.N. SECRETARY GENERAL BAN KI-MOON, U.N. SPECIAL ENVOY TO SYRIA HAVE SECRETARY GENERAL BAN KI-MOON, U.N. SPECIAL ENVOY TO SYRIA HAVE PLEASE, NO MILITARY ACTION U.N. SPECIAL ENVOY TO SYRIA HAVE PLEASE, NO MILITARY ACTION AND I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT PLEASE, NO MILITARY ACTION AND I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT TALKINGNISTRATION KEEPS AND I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT TALKINGNISTRATION KEEPS ABOUT AFTER THIS IMPORTANT TALKINGNISTRATION KEEPS ABOUT AFTER THIS IMPORTANT STRIKE, WE THINK IT'S IMPORTANT ABOUT AFTER THIS IMPORTANT STRIKE, WE THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO RETURN TO PEACE.

STRIKE, WE THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO RETURN TO PEACE.

A WE REALLY THINK THAT AFTER TO RETURN TO PEACE.

A WE REALLY THINK THAT AFTER LIMITED MILITARY STRIKE, ASSAD A WE REALLY THINK THAT AFTER LIMITED MILITARY STRIKE, ASSAD WILL SUE FOR PEACE?

LIMITED MILITARY STRIKE, ASSAD WILL SUE FOR PEACE?

GWEN: THE U.S.

DOES HAVE SPURS WILL SUE FOR PEACE?

GWEN: THE U.S.

DOES HAVE SPURS IN THE REGION -- TURKEY, GWEN: THE U.S.

DOES HAVE SPURS IN THE REGION -- TURKEY, ARABIA ANDND SAUDI IN THE REGION -- TURKEY, ARABIA ANDND SAUDI SO HOW IMPORTANT IS IT OR HOW ARABIA ANDND SAUDI SO HOW IMPORTANT IS IT OR HOW BALANCE THE CONTRA SO HOW IMPORTANT IS IT OR HOW BALANCE THE CONTRA ARGUMENT THAT HE HAS ARAB BALANCE THE CONTRA ARGUMENT THAT HE HAS ARAB SUPPORT?

ARGUMENT THAT HE HAS ARAB SUPPORT?

OBVIOUSLY.RS, SUPPORT?

OBVIOUSLY.RS, GWEN: YOU'RE THINKING REFUGEES OBVIOUSLY.RS, GWEN: YOU'RE THINKING REFUGEES OF LEAKAGEENTIAL GWEN: YOU'RE THINKING REFUGEES OF LEAKAGEENTIAL OVER THE BORDER AND ISRAEL.

OF LEAKAGEENTIAL OVER THE BORDER AND ISRAEL.

>> THEY HAVE EVERY INTEREST IN OVER THE BORDER AND ISRAEL.

>> THEY HAVE EVERY INTEREST IN CONTAINING ASSAD AND KEEPING >> THEY HAVE EVERY INTEREST IN CONTAINING ASSAD AND KEEPING IRAN FROM BASICALLY WINNING WHAT CONTAINING ASSAD AND KEEPING IRAN FROM BASICALLY WINNING WHAT SYRIA.OXY WAR IN IRAN FROM BASICALLY WINNING WHAT SYRIA.OXY WAR IN HAVING SAID THAT, THOUGH, I SYRIA.OXY WAR IN HAVING SAID THAT, THOUGH, I THINK THERE'S THIS INEVITABLE HAVING SAID THAT, THOUGH, I THINK THERE'S THIS INEVITABLE CONTRAST THAT WILL BE MADE AS IT THINK THERE'S THIS INEVITABLE CONTRAST THAT WILL BE MADE AS IT HAS BEEN THROUGHOUT THIS WHOLE CONTRAST THAT WILL BE MADE AS IT HAS BEEN THROUGHOUT THIS WHOLE IRAQ, THAT GEORGE HAS BEEN THROUGHOUT THIS WHOLE IRAQ, THAT GEORGE BUSH WAS UNILATERAL WITHOUT A IRAQ, THAT GEORGE BUSH WAS UNILATERAL WITHOUT A YOU COULDAND NOW BUSH WAS UNILATERAL WITHOUT A YOU COULDAND NOW ARGUE OBAMA HAS LESS OF A YOU COULDAND NOW ARGUE OBAMA HAS LESS OF A COALITION THAN BUSH DID.

ARGUE OBAMA HAS LESS OF A COALITION THAN BUSH DID.

BUSH DIDN'T GET THE U.N.

COALITION THAN BUSH DID.

BUSH DIDN'T GET THE U.N.

HE WAS FORCED, BUSH DIDN'T GET THE U.N.

HE WAS FORCED, BUT DID GET A U.N.

RESOLUTION HE WAS FORCED, BUT DID GET A U.N.

RESOLUTION SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS BUT DID GET A U.N.

RESOLUTION SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH U.N. SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH U.N.

HE HADS AND BUSH ARGUED OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH U.N.

HE HADS AND BUSH ARGUED A RIGHT TO GO AND HE ALSO GOT HE HADS AND BUSH ARGUED A RIGHT TO GO AND HE ALSO GOT PERMISSION FROM CONGRESS WITH A RIGHT TO GO AND HE ALSO GOT PERMISSION FROM CONGRESS WITH AND HILLARY CLINTON PERMISSION FROM CONGRESS WITH AND HILLARY CLINTON VOTING FOR HIM.

AND HILLARY CLINTON VOTING FOR HIM.

IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE BARACK VOTING FOR HIM.

IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE BARACK CONGRESS.

WAIT FOR IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE BARACK CONGRESS.

WAIT FOR >> I THINK THIS IS A CASE WHERE CONGRESS.

WAIT FOR >> I THINK THIS IS A CASE WHERE THE ADMINISTRATION SEEMS TO HAVE >> I THINK THIS IS A CASE WHERE THE ADMINISTRATION SEEMS TO HAVE DECIDED THIS IS GOING TO BE ON THE ADMINISTRATION SEEMS TO HAVE DECIDED THIS IS GOING TO BE ON WILLING TO DO IT, DECIDED THIS IS GOING TO BE ON WILLING TO DO IT, NOT ONLY FOR THE REGION ITSELF WILLING TO DO IT, NOT ONLY FOR THE REGION ITSELF REGION,ALLIES IN THE NOT ONLY FOR THE REGION ITSELF REGION,ALLIES IN THE BUT ALSO FOR THE CASE OF IRAN REGION,ALLIES IN THE BUT ALSO FOR THE CASE OF IRAN WHICH IS ONE WHERE THE BUT ALSO FOR THE CASE OF IRAN WHICH IS ONE WHERE THE UNITED STATES THE WHICH IS ONE WHERE THE UNITED STATES THE WHICH HAS SAID RYAN BRAUN -- UNITED STATES THE WHICH HAS SAID RYAN BRAUN -- NOT BE PERMITTED TO WHICH HAS SAID RYAN BRAUN -- NOT BE PERMITTED TO HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON, THE NOT BE PERMITTED TO HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON, THE THATISTRATION IS CONSCIOUS HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON, THE THATISTRATION IS CONSCIOUS IF WE DON'T ACT, THE PRESIDENT THATISTRATION IS CONSCIOUS IF WE DON'T ACT, THE PRESIDENT HAVING ELEVATED THAT RED LINE, IF WE DON'T ACT, THE PRESIDENT HAVING ELEVATED THAT RED LINE, THEY'RE GOING TO CONCLUDE -- HAVING ELEVATED THAT RED LINE, THEY'RE GOING TO CONCLUDE -- >> THEY'RE GOING TO CONCLUDE -- >> CONCLUDE -- >> CONCLUDE -- GWEN: THAT WORD CREDIBILITY RUNS CONCLUDE -- GWEN: THAT WORD CREDIBILITY RUNS THROUGH THIS WHOLE THING WHICH GWEN: THAT WORD CREDIBILITY RUNS THROUGH THIS WHOLE THING WHICH WHAT WE SAY ORO THROUGH THIS WHOLE THING WHICH WHAT WE SAY ORO NO ONE WILL BELIEVE US.

WHAT WE SAY ORO NO ONE WILL BELIEVE US.

>> KERRY BROUGHT THAT UP NO ONE WILL BELIEVE US.

>> KERRY BROUGHT THAT UP EXPLICITLY.

>> KERRY BROUGHT THAT UP EXPLICITLY.

GWEN: AND ALSO KERRY TALKED EXPLICITLY.

GWEN: AND ALSO KERRY TALKED ABOUT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC GWEN: AND ALSO KERRY TALKED ABOUT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC EXHAUSTION WITH THIS.

ABOUT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC EXHAUSTION WITH THIS.

BIT MORETEN A LITTLE EXHAUSTION WITH THIS.

BIT MORETEN A LITTLE ON WHAT HE HAD TO SAY TODAY BIT MORETEN A LITTLE ON WHAT HE HAD TO SAY TODAY ABOUT THAT.

ON WHAT HE HAD TO SAY TODAY ABOUT THAT.

THAT AFTER A DECADE ABOUT THAT.

THAT AFTER A DECADE OF CONFLICT, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT AFTER A DECADE OF CONFLICT, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF WAR.D OF CONFLICT, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF WAR.D BELIEVE ME, I AM, TOO.

OF WAR.D BELIEVE ME, I AM, TOO.

BUT FATIGUE DOES NOT ABSOLVE US BELIEVE ME, I AM, TOO.

BUT FATIGUE DOES NOT ABSOLVE US OF OUR RESPONSIBILITY.

BUT FATIGUE DOES NOT ABSOLVE US OF OUR RESPONSIBILITY.

JUST LONGING FOR PEACE DOES NOT OF OUR RESPONSIBILITY.

JUST LONGING FOR PEACE DOES NOT BRING IT ABOUT.

JUST LONGING FOR PEACE DOES NOT BRING IT ABOUT.

GWEN: HOW FATIGUED ARE BRING IT ABOUT.

GWEN: HOW FATIGUED ARE AMERICANS, JOHN?

GWEN: HOW FATIGUED ARE AMERICANS, JOHN?

FATIGUED.

AMERICANS, JOHN?

FATIGUED.

IF YOU LOOK AT OUR POLL THIS FATIGUED.

IF YOU LOOK AT OUR POLL THIS ITNING, WE ASKED PEOPLE, IS IF YOU LOOK AT OUR POLL THIS ITNING, WE ASKED PEOPLE, IS IN THE UNITED STATES' NATIONAL ITNING, WE ASKED PEOPLE, IS IN THE UNITED STATES' NATIONAL INTERESTS TO TAKE MILITARY IN THE UNITED STATES' NATIONAL INTERESTS TO TAKE MILITARY ACTION AGAINST SYRIA?

INTERESTS TO TAKE MILITARY ACTION AGAINST SYRIA?

21% SAID YES.

ACTION AGAINST SYRIA?

21% SAID YES.

WOULD MILITARY ACTION AGAINST 21% SAID YES.

WOULD MILITARY ACTION AGAINST THE LOT OFVE WOULD MILITARY ACTION AGAINST THE LOT OFVE CIVILIANS IN SYRIA?

THE LOT OFVE CIVILIANS IN SYRIA?

27% SAID YES.

CIVILIANS IN SYRIA?

27% SAID YES.

PHRASEU INCLUDE THE 27% SAID YES.

PHRASEU INCLUDE THE "CHEMICAL WEAPONS" IN THE PHRASEU INCLUDE THE "CHEMICAL WEAPONS" IN THE QUESTION AND SAY SHOULD WE HIT "CHEMICAL WEAPONS" IN THE QUESTION AND SAY SHOULD WE HIT THEM IN RESPONSE TO THEIR USE OF QUESTION AND SAY SHOULD WE HIT THEM IN RESPONSE TO THEIR USE OF WEAPONS, 42% SAID YES THEM IN RESPONSE TO THEIR USE OF WEAPONS, 42% SAID YES AND 50% SAID NO AND IF YOU WEAPONS, 42% SAID YES AND 50% SAID NO AND IF YOU BYDITION IT ANOTHER WAY AND 50% SAID NO AND IF YOU BYDITION IT ANOTHER WAY SAYING THE RESPONSE WOULD BE BYDITION IT ANOTHER WAY SAYING THE RESPONSE WOULD BE MISSILES LAUNCHED FROM SHIPS, SAYING THE RESPONSE WOULD BE MISSILES LAUNCHED FROM SHIPS, NOT BOOTS ON THE GROUND, THEN MISSILES LAUNCHED FROM SHIPS, NOT BOOTS ON THE GROUND, THEN YOU GET SUPPORT COMING UP TO 50% NOT BOOTS ON THE GROUND, THEN YOU GET SUPPORT COMING UP TO 50% BUT IT IS PLAIN THAT THE YOU GET SUPPORT COMING UP TO 50% BUT IT IS PLAIN THAT THE A HIGH BAROPLE HAVE BUT IT IS PLAIN THAT THE A HIGH BAROPLE HAVE IN THIS CASE FOR UNDERSTANDING A HIGH BAROPLE HAVE IN THIS CASE FOR UNDERSTANDING THAT IT'S IN THE NATIONAL IN THIS CASE FOR UNDERSTANDING THAT IT'S IN THE NATIONAL KNOWESTS AND WANTING TO THAT IT'S IN THE NATIONAL KNOWESTS AND WANTING TO THAT THERE IS A WAY WE CAN LIMIT KNOWESTS AND WANTING TO THAT THERE IS A WAY WE CAN LIMIT INVOLVEMENT.

THAT THERE IS A WAY WE CAN LIMIT INVOLVEMENT.

>> SINCE VIETNAM, EVERY MILITARY INVOLVEMENT.

>> SINCE VIETNAM, EVERY MILITARY ACTION WE'VE TAKEN WITH THE >> SINCE VIETNAM, EVERY MILITARY ACTION WE'VE TAKEN WITH THE OF BOSNIA HAD ACTION WE'VE TAKEN WITH THE OF BOSNIA HAD MAJORITY, IN FACT, VERY STRONG OF BOSNIA HAD MAJORITY, IN FACT, VERY STRONG LEAST IN THEORT AT MAJORITY, IN FACT, VERY STRONG LEAST IN THEORT AT INITIAL DAYS AFTERWARDS.

LEAST IN THEORT AT INITIAL DAYS AFTERWARDS.

WE HAVEN'T SEEN WHAT THE INITIAL DAYS AFTERWARDS.

WE HAVEN'T SEEN WHAT THE RESPONSE WILL BE ONCE -- WE HAVEN'T SEEN WHAT THE RESPONSE WILL BE ONCE -- HE DOES, PRESIDENT RESPONSE WILL BE ONCE -- HE DOES, PRESIDENT OBAMA -- LAUNCHES AN ATTACK.

HE DOES, PRESIDENT OBAMA -- LAUNCHES AN ATTACK.

RALLY AROUNDRE'S A OBAMA -- LAUNCHES AN ATTACK.

RALLY AROUNDRE'S A THE FLAG.

RALLY AROUNDRE'S A THE FLAG.

BEEN HEREICANS HAVE THE FLAG.

BEEN HEREICANS HAVE BEFORE AND WE'RE ON THE TAIL END BEEN HEREICANS HAVE BEFORE AND WE'RE ON THE TAIL END AMERICA'S LONGEST BEFORE AND WE'RE ON THE TAIL END AMERICA'S LONGEST WAR AND THAT CHANGES PEOPLE'S AMERICA'S LONGEST WAR AND THAT CHANGES PEOPLE'S APPETITE ABOUT WHAT CAN BE DONE WAR AND THAT CHANGES PEOPLE'S APPETITE ABOUT WHAT CAN BE DONE SURGICAL STRIKE APPETITE ABOUT WHAT CAN BE DONE SURGICAL STRIKE THEY USED TO CALL IT.

SURGICAL STRIKE THEY USED TO CALL IT.

SOUND APPEALING BUT THEY USED TO CALL IT.

SOUND APPEALING BUT WE'VE DISCOVERED IT DOESN'T SOUND APPEALING BUT WE'VE DISCOVERED IT DOESN'T EXIST.

WE'VE DISCOVERED IT DOESN'T EXIST.

THEUEST QION IS EXIST.

THEUEST QION IS WORDED MAKES SUCH A DIFFERENCE THEUEST QION IS WORDED MAKES SUCH A DIFFERENCE IN THE ANSWER.

WORDED MAKES SUCH A DIFFERENCE IN THE ANSWER.

WE'VE SEEN OVER THE PAST IN THE ANSWER.

WE'VE SEEN OVER THE PAST WEEK HAS BEEN AN UNPRECEDENTED WE'VE SEEN OVER THE PAST WEEK HAS BEEN AN UNPRECEDENTED THE PART CAMPAIGN ON WEEK HAS BEEN AN UNPRECEDENTED THE PART CAMPAIGN ON OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.

THE PART CAMPAIGN ON OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.

IT'S NOT LIKE THEY SAID, WE'RE OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION.

IT'S NOT LIKE THEY SAID, WE'RE GOING TO BOMB.

IT'S NOT LIKE THEY SAID, WE'RE GOING TO BOMB.

BUILDING UP AND GOING TO BOMB.

BUILDING UP AND BUILDING UP WITH THE STATE BUILDING UP AND BUILDING UP WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT AT THE FRONT OF THIS BUILDING UP WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT AT THE FRONT OF THIS REALLYNG SYSTEM BUT DEPARTMENT AT THE FRONT OF THIS REALLYNG SYSTEM BUT TRYING TO SEND A SIGNAL ABOUT REALLYNG SYSTEM BUT TRYING TO SEND A SIGNAL ABOUT LEGITIMACY, JUSTIFICATION, ABOUT TRYING TO SEND A SIGNAL ABOUT LEGITIMACY, JUSTIFICATION, ABOUT THEY THINK THEY HAVE SUPPORT LEGITIMACY, JUSTIFICATION, ABOUT THEY THINK THEY HAVE SUPPORT FROM THE ARAB LEAGUE, ABOUT THE THEY THINK THEY HAVE SUPPORT FROM THE ARAB LEAGUE, ABOUT THE DANGER -- I WANT TO MAKE A POINT FROM THE ARAB LEAGUE, ABOUT THE DANGER -- I WANT TO MAKE A POINT THAT PETER MADE ABOUT IRAN, DANGER -- I WANT TO MAKE A POINT THAT PETER MADE ABOUT IRAN, ALTHOUGH IT'S TRUE WE DON'T WANT THAT PETER MADE ABOUT IRAN, ALTHOUGH IT'S TRUE WE DON'T WANT WIN SINCERAN TO ALTHOUGH IT'S TRUE WE DON'T WANT WIN SINCERAN TO THEY'VE BEEN SUPPORTING THE WIN SINCERAN TO THEY'VE BEEN SUPPORTING THE SYRIAN REGIME, IRAN IS NOT THEY'VE BEEN SUPPORTING THE SYRIAN REGIME, IRAN IS NOT THE USE OFTH SYRIAN REGIME, IRAN IS NOT THE USE OFTH CHEMICAL WEAPONS BECAUSE THEY THE USE OFTH CHEMICAL WEAPONS BECAUSE THEY HAD CHEMICAL WEAPONS USED CHEMICAL WEAPONS BECAUSE THEY HAD CHEMICAL WEAPONS USED AGAINST THEM.

HAD CHEMICAL WEAPONS USED AGAINST THEM.

QUIET ON THIS AGAINST THEM.

QUIET ON THIS ISSUE.

QUIET ON THIS ISSUE.

GWEN: LET'S TALK ABOUT CONGRESS ISSUE.

GWEN: LET'S TALK ABOUT CONGRESS FOR A MINUTE.

GWEN: LET'S TALK ABOUT CONGRESS FOR A MINUTE.

BOEHNER, THE HOUSE SPEAKER, FOR A MINUTE.

BOEHNER, THE HOUSE SPEAKER, WROTE A LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT BOEHNER, THE HOUSE SPEAKER, WROTE A LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT BEING THERE SHOULD WROTE A LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT BEING THERE SHOULD MEANINGFUL CONSULTATION.

BEING THERE SHOULD MEANINGFUL CONSULTATION.

EVERYBODY IS INTERPRETING WHAT MEANINGFUL CONSULTATION.

EVERYBODY IS INTERPRETING WHAT THAT MEANS?

EVERYBODY IS INTERPRETING WHAT THAT MEANS?

WAR POWERSEAN THAT MEANS?

WAR POWERSEAN RESOLUTION, DOES THAT MEAN WAR POWERSEAN RESOLUTION, DOES THAT MEAN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, RESOLUTION, DOES THAT MEAN MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, BRIEFING THEM?

MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, BRIEFING THEM?

WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

BRIEFING THEM?

WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

>> HE DID NOT SAY THIS NEEDS TO WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

>> HE DID NOT SAY THIS NEEDS TO BE AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS.

>> HE DID NOT SAY THIS NEEDS TO BE AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS.

HE SAID CONSULTATION.

BE AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS.

HE SAID CONSULTATION.

THE TIMING CONSIDERATIONS ARE HE SAID CONSULTATION.

THE TIMING CONSIDERATIONS ARE INTERESTING AND TRICKY FOR THE THE TIMING CONSIDERATIONS ARE INTERESTING AND TRICKY FOR THE ADMINISTRATION.

INTERESTING AND TRICKY FOR THE ADMINISTRATION.

YOU TALKED ABOUT THE INSPECTORS ADMINISTRATION.

YOU TALKED ABOUT THE INSPECTORS LEAVE SATURDAY, WE'RE PRESUMING YOU TALKED ABOUT THE INSPECTORS LEAVE SATURDAY, WE'RE PRESUMING SOMETHING WOULD HAPPEN.

LEAVE SATURDAY, WE'RE PRESUMING SOMETHING WOULD HAPPEN.

THAT'S A PRETTY GOOD SOMETHING WOULD HAPPEN.

THAT'S A PRETTY GOOD PRESUMPTION.

THAT'S A PRETTY GOOD PRESUMPTION.

ON THE OTHER HAND, THE PRESIDENT PRESUMPTION.

ON THE OTHER HAND, THE PRESIDENT NEXT WEEK FOR A ON THE OTHER HAND, THE PRESIDENT NEXT WEEK FOR A G20 MEETING, CONGRESS RETURNS ON NEXT WEEK FOR A G20 MEETING, CONGRESS RETURNS ON THE 9TH AND BAN KI-MOON SAID WE G20 MEETING, CONGRESS RETURNS ON THE 9TH AND BAN KI-MOON SAID WE KNOW THE RESULTS OF SOME THE 9TH AND BAN KI-MOON SAID WE KNOW THE RESULTS OF SOME OF THE INSPECTION SAMPLES TAKEN KNOW THE RESULTS OF SOME OF THE INSPECTION SAMPLES TAKEN THETWO WEEKS SO HOW DOES OF THE INSPECTION SAMPLES TAKEN THETWO WEEKS SO HOW DOES ADMINISTRATION NAVIGATE THAT?

THETWO WEEKS SO HOW DOES ADMINISTRATION NAVIGATE THAT?

>> SECRETARY HAGEL GETS HOME ADMINISTRATION NAVIGATE THAT?

>> SECRETARY HAGEL GETS HOME FROM HIS TRIP TONIGHT.

>> SECRETARY HAGEL GETS HOME FROM HIS TRIP TONIGHT.

HE'S HOME NOW.

FROM HIS TRIP TONIGHT.

HE'S HOME NOW.

SO NOW, PRESUMABLY, WITH THE HE'S HOME NOW.

SO NOW, PRESUMABLY, WITH THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE IN TOWN, SO NOW, PRESUMABLY, WITH THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE IN TOWN, YOU CAN DO SOMETHING.

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE IN TOWN, YOU CAN DO SOMETHING.

RUSSIA ONTO LEAVE FOR YOU CAN DO SOMETHING.

RUSSIA ONTO LEAVE FOR TUESDAY.

RUSSIA ONTO LEAVE FOR TUESDAY.

I THINK THE WINDOW IS OPEN.

TUESDAY.

I THINK THE WINDOW IS OPEN.

I THINK THE WINDOW, ONCE THE I THINK THE WINDOW IS OPEN.

I THINK THE WINDOW, ONCE THE INSPECTORS LEAVE, I THINK I THINK THE WINDOW, ONCE THE INSPECTORS LEAVE, I THINK THE WINDOW IS OPEN AND MOST INSPECTORS LEAVE, I THINK THE WINDOW IS OPEN AND MOST PEOPLE THINK IT WILL CLOSE THE WINDOW IS OPEN AND MOST PEOPLE THINK IT WILL CLOSE OBAMA GOES TO RUSSIA.

PEOPLE THINK IT WILL CLOSE OBAMA GOES TO RUSSIA.

>> I THINK IT'S HARD TO IMAGINE OBAMA GOES TO RUSSIA.

>> I THINK IT'S HARD TO IMAGINE TO THESIDENT GOING >> I THINK IT'S HARD TO IMAGINE TO THESIDENT GOING ST. PETERSBURG SUMMIT WITHOUT TO THESIDENT GOING ST. PETERSBURG SUMMIT WITHOUT HAVING THIS HAPPEN, THE IDEA OF ST. PETERSBURG SUMMIT WITHOUT HAVING THIS HAPPEN, THE IDEA OF UP THAT CONVERSATION.

HAVING THIS HAPPEN, THE IDEA OF UP THAT CONVERSATION.

>> PARTICULARLY IN RUSSIA.

UP THAT CONVERSATION.

>> PARTICULARLY IN RUSSIA.

PARTISANNAL THOUGHT, >> PARTICULARLY IN RUSSIA.

PARTISANNAL THOUGHT, DIVIDE.

PARTISANNAL THOUGHT, DIVIDE.

WOULD DIVIDE.

WOULD EXPECT.

WOULD EXPECT.

>> NOT AT ALL.

EXPECT.

>> NOT AT ALL.

A LOT OF PEOPLE PUSHING THE >> NOT AT ALL.

A LOT OF PEOPLE PUSHING THE INTO ACTION IN SYRIA A LOT OF PEOPLE PUSHING THE INTO ACTION IN SYRIA HAVE BEEN CONSERVATIVE INTO ACTION IN SYRIA HAVE BEEN CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS.

HAVE BEEN CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS.

AS WE DO SO OFTEN REPUBLICANS.

AS WE DO SO OFTEN ON THE APPROVAL OF THE PRESIDENT AS WE DO SO OFTEN ON THE APPROVAL OF THE PRESIDENT DON'T SEEISSUES, YOU ON THE APPROVAL OF THE PRESIDENT DON'T SEEISSUES, YOU A STARK SHIFT.

DON'T SEEISSUES, YOU A STARK SHIFT.

GWEN: I SAW A LOT OF LIBERAL A STARK SHIFT.

GWEN: I SAW A LOT OF LIBERAL VOTE AND ASKING FOR A GWEN: I SAW A LOT OF LIBERAL VOTE AND ASKING FOR A BEING VERY -- VOTE AND ASKING FOR A BEING VERY -- OF OBAMA'SE, ONE BEING VERY -- OF OBAMA'SE, ONE GOVERNOR TO, FIRST OF OBAMA'SE, ONE GOVERNOR TO, FIRST SUPPORT BARACK OBAMA FOR GOVERNOR TO, FIRST SUPPORT BARACK OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT, SAYS HE HAS TO HAVE A SUPPORT BARACK OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT, SAYS HE HAS TO HAVE A FIRST.

PRESIDENT, SAYS HE HAS TO HAVE A FIRST.

GWEN: YOU HAVE TO THINK IF IT FIRST.

GWEN: YOU HAVE TO THINK IF IT WERE SENATOR OBAMA, HE WOULD GWEN: YOU HAVE TO THINK IF IT WERE SENATOR OBAMA, HE WOULD FOR IT.

WERE SENATOR OBAMA, HE WOULD FOR IT.

>> UNDER THE LEGALITY IN THE FOR IT.

>> UNDER THE LEGALITY IN THE HE DOESN'T HAVE TO >> UNDER THE LEGALITY IN THE HE DOESN'T HAVE TO CONSULT.

HE DOESN'T HAVE TO CONSULT.

GWEN: WE'LL PROBABLY SEE THINGS CONSULT.

GWEN: WE'LL PROBABLY SEE THINGS AS WE SPEAK THIS GWEN: WE'LL PROBABLY SEE THINGS AS WE SPEAK THIS WEEKEND.

AS WE SPEAK THIS WEEKEND.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, THIS IS WEEKEND.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, THIS IS INTERESTING.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, THIS IS INTERESTING.

NEEDLES ALLPINS AND INTERESTING.

NEEDLES ALLPINS AND WEEK.

NEEDLES ALLPINS AND WEEK.

IT'S JUST THE TIP OF THE WEEK.

IT'S JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG.

IT'S JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG.

WE'LL CONTINUE TO TALK ABOUT ICEBERG.

WE'LL CONTINUE TO TALK ABOUT OUR -- WE'LL CONTINUE WE'LL CONTINUE TO TALK ABOUT OUR -- WE'LL CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION ON OUR OUR -- WE'LL CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION ON OUR "WASHINGTON WEEK" WEBCAST EXTRA THE CONVERSATION ON OUR "WASHINGTON WEEK" WEBCAST EXTRA TALK A BIT ALSO "WASHINGTON WEEK" WEBCAST EXTRA TALK A BIT ALSO ABOUT THIS WEEK'S 50TH TALK A BIT ALSO ABOUT THIS WEEK'S 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE MARCH ON ABOUT THIS WEEK'S 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE MARCH ON WASHINGTON.

ANNIVERSARY OF THE MARCH ON WASHINGTON.

THAT STREAMS LIVE AT 8:30 P.M. WASHINGTON.

THAT STREAMS LIVE AT 8:30 P.M. EASTERN AND IS AVAILABLE ALL THAT STREAMS LIVE AT 8:30 P.M. EASTERN AND IS AVAILABLE ALL YOU'VE GOTG BECAUSE EASTERN AND IS AVAILABLE ALL YOU'VE GOTG BECAUSE NOTHING EE TOLS DO AT YOU'VE GOTG BECAUSE NOTHING EE TOLS DO AT PBS.ORG/WASHINGTONWEEK.

NOTHING EE TOLS DO AT PBS.ORG/WASHINGTONWEEK.

WE'LL MAKE IT WORTH YOUR TIME.

PBS.ORG/WASHINGTONWEEK.

WE'LL MAKE IT WORTH YOUR TIME.

THERE, YOU CAN READ WE'LL MAKE IT WORTH YOUR TIME.

THERE, YOU CAN READ MY BEHIND-THE-SCENES BLOG ABOUT THERE, YOU CAN READ MY BEHIND-THE-SCENES BLOG ABOUT INTERVIEW WITH THE MY BEHIND-THE-SCENES BLOG ABOUT INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT AND JOIN ME FOR MY INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT AND JOIN ME FOR MY MONTHLY WEB CHAT NEXT THURSDAY PRESIDENT AND JOIN ME FOR MY MONTHLY WEB CHAT NEXT THURSDAY AT 1:00 P.M. EASTERN TIME.

MONTHLY WEB CHAT NEXT THURSDAY AT 1:00 P.M. EASTERN TIME.

KEEP UP WITH DAILY EVENTS ALL AT 1:00 P.M. EASTERN TIME.

KEEP UP WITH DAILY EVENTS ALL WEEK ON THE NEWS HOUR AND WE'LL KEEP UP WITH DAILY EVENTS ALL WEEK ON THE NEWS HOUR AND WE'LL YOU NEXT WEEK ON "WASHINGTON WEEK ON THE NEWS HOUR AND WE'LL YOU NEXT WEEK ON "WASHINGTON WEEK."