Vermont Public Specials
Vermont Gov. Phil Scott's 2026 State of the State Address
Season 2026 Episode 1 | 42m 37sVideo has Closed Captions
Gov. Phil Scott insists on lawmakers 'keeping our word' on education reform in State of State speech
Republican Gov. Phil Scott has taken the state budget hostage in what has suddenly become an even higher stakes showdown in Montpelier over the future of education in Vermont. Recorded live from the State House Jan. 7, 2026
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Vermont Public Specials is a local public television program presented by Vermont Public
Vermont Public Specials
Vermont Gov. Phil Scott's 2026 State of the State Address
Season 2026 Episode 1 | 42m 37sVideo has Closed Captions
Republican Gov. Phil Scott has taken the state budget hostage in what has suddenly become an even higher stakes showdown in Montpelier over the future of education in Vermont. Recorded live from the State House Jan. 7, 2026
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
How to Watch Vermont Public Specials
Vermont Public Specials is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorship-As the lieutenant -governor and chair of this -joint committee, I get the -the pleasure of introducing -a young man that represents -the future of Vermont.
-I get to pick one guest -to come and sit -in the well of the house.
-And today, -I invited Zachary Hornstein, known to his folks and friends as Zach and Zach.
We met through -First Robotics, which is an -!incredible program that if you -don't know about it, -I'd ask you to look into it.
-It's offered in a bunch -of schools around the state, -but not all of them yet.
-And they build teams.
-They're similar -to athletic teams, -except instead of playing -soccer.
-They're learning hands on -engineering, robotics.
-Really great Stem skills.
-And so, I would like to ask -Zach if he would -stand up and be recognized.
-This joint -assembly is convened -pursuant -to the provisions of J.
-Rs.
30, -!which the clerk will now read.
-Yes, sir.
-Do you want to -provide for a joint -assembly to receive the state -of the state message -from the governor, -resolved by the Senate -and House of Representatives, that the two houses meet in Joint Assembly on Wednesday, -January 7th, 2026 -at 2:00 in the afternoon -to receive the state -of the state message -from the governor.
-Now, the chair recognizes the Senator from Chittenden Central District -for the purpose -of making a motion.
-!I move that a committee of six -be appointed by the chair -to wait upon His Excellency -the Governor, -and escort him -into this chamber -for the purpose -of receiving his state -of the state message.
-Now, the Senator -from Chittenden Central -District has moved -that the Committee of Six -be appointed by the chair -to wait upon His Excellency -the Governor, -and escort him -into this chamber -for the purpose -of receiving his State -of the state message.
Are -you ready for the question?
-If so, all in favor, say aye.
-All opposed?
Nay.
-The ayes have it -and the motion carries.
-The members are the member -from Essex Junction.
-Representative Dolan, -the member from Saint Albans -town representative Toof, -the member from Burlington.
-Representative Cheena, -the Senator from Windsor -district.
-Senator white, the Senator -from Windsor district.
-Senator.
-Major and the Senator -from Rutland District.
-Senator Williams, will -the Committee please assemble -and perform -the duties assigned to it?
-Madam Sergeant at arms.
-Mr.
president, -would the members -of the General -Assembly and guests -please rise?
-It is my distinct privilege -to present to you -the governor of Vermont, -the Honorable Philip B -Scott.
-[applause] -It is now my distinct honor -to present to you -the governor -of the state of Vermont.
-The Honorable Philip B Scott.
-[applause] -Mr.
president, -madam speaker, members -of the General Assembly.
Mr.
-Chief justice, honored -guests, my fellow Vermonters, -the opening of the second -half of the biennium gives -governors a chance to report -on the state of the state, -reflect on what we've done -and what we still have to do -for 235 years, those elected -have to gather -to do the work of democracy, -the building, the town -and the season may -have all changed, -but our purpose has not.
-We're here to solve problems -and help people.
-Unfortunately, across -much of the country, -that basic principle -has been lost -and with it, faith -in government itself.
-When conflict is chosen over -cooperation, division -over decency -and outrage over outcomes, -people lose trust.
-They stop believing -their voices matter, -and too many wonder -if their government -still works for them.
-But here's the good news.
-Vermont can be the example.
-We can fiercely debate -the issues, -but do it in a way -that's civil and respectful.
-So we get better policy, -not better campaign material.
-!This is entirely in our hands.
-We don't need to be -asked to do the right thing.
-We just need to do it.
-In 13 days, -I'll present a budget that -!reflects an important reality.
-One time pandemic recovery -funds are gone -and federal support -is uncertain.
-All politics in Washington -keep fear and anger high.
-Families are dealing -with the ever increasing cost -of living -and a tax burden that rises -faster than their paychecks.
-So they're looking to us -for relief.
-That means being honest -about the hard choices -we have to make.
-Focusing on -what's within our control -and what matters most.
-This year's -spending package has required -difficult decisions, -but it sets clear priorities.
-Proposes smart investments -and it will be funded -without new taxes.
-My team has prepared -thoughtful proposals -in the areas of housing, -energy, -!health care and public safety, -and we'll share some of them -with you.
-Right after this speech.
-These issues are incredibly -important to our future, -and we will address -each of them with purpose.
-But today, -I want to talk to you about -our most critical challenge.
-Education reform.
-Because this session, -we have the opportunity -!and the obligation to continue -this transformation in order -to build the best public -!education system in the nation -at a cost -taxpayers can afford.
-Last year, -we took a historic and -long overdue step forward.
-X 73 was -a result of good policy work, -compromise, and importantly, -a willingness -to admit the old system -no longer serves Vermont.
-Because of your courage, -it's finally possible -to build something better.
-But that progress -is not guaranteed.
-And we've seen this movie -before -!X 60 focused mostly on funding -!rather than the system itself.
-X 68 only addressed -the property -tax burden, -not the growth in spending.
-Act 46 made small changes -to governance -but avoided dealing -with quality and outcomes.
-What's been -missing is a political -will to address the problem -!with a comprehensive approach, -because how it's organized, -where -resources are prioritized -and who is accountable for -results, are all intertwined.
-When costs rise and pressure -builds, the approach -has been to find that quick -and easy, quick and easy fix.
-Throw more money at it.
-Wrap it in duct tape -and hope it all holds.
-And every time the result -is higher costs -and higher taxes.
-While student outcomes falls -short and gaps -and opportunity widen -between regions.
-This is the reality -of the old system -and previous attempts -to keep it afloat.
-But things change -for the better.
-The moment -the majority of you had -the resolve to pass act 73, -which does so much more -than just -rearrange the deckchairs, -it will expand pre-K.
-So our youngest students -have a solid foundation.
-It will increase equity.
-So everyone is offered -a wide range of courses -!and programs across the state.
-It will expand CTE -so more -!kids have access to the trades -and the great careers -that come along with it.
-It will -!increase salaries for teachers -who are paid -less than their peers, -and more affluent areas.
-!X 73 will deliver the targeted -support students need -and build a structure -to carry out other reforms -to provide universal -after school programs, focus -on stronger literacy, create -accountability, increase -quality and much, much more.
-When you pass this law -last year, you took a stand -for your constituents -who said, enough is enough -and you chose a better future -for our kids.
-And for that, I thank you.
-!But the real work begins today -because now -we have to follow through.
-Here's what we're up against.
-Vermonters are set to spend -$2.5 billion on pre-K -through 12th.
-When I became governor, -it was 1.6 billion.
-We all know -the impact on property taxes, -because you get the bill -in the mail -and you -see it in black and white, -but we don't get a -bill for all the other ways -we contribute to the Ed fund.
-For example, every dollar -!from the sales tax and lottery -goes to the Ed fund, -as well as a portion of both -the rooms and meals, -and purchase and use taxes, -which means about 800 million -above and beyond property -taxes goes to education.
-Remember those tough budget -!decisions I mentioned earlier?
-Here's -something to think about.
-I'm sure some of you -would like to provide -more support for child care.
-!Others would like to give more -funding -to their towns -to take care of the roads.
-And you know me, -!I'd like to see us lower taxes -and build more housing -for working Vermonters.
-If we had just a fraction -of the general -fund dollars that have been -wasted due to inefficiencies, -!it would go a long way towards -investing -in any of these efforts -and more like public safety, -emergency shelters, -transportation, flood -mitigation, school -construction, -and dozens -of other initiatives.
-Instead, these other -priorities have to compete -for what's left.
-And this year, -there won't be much, -if any, left over.
-Because yet again, for -!the information we have today, -we expect education spending -!to require another 200 million -and another double -digit property tax increase.
-And Vermonters can't afford.
-So while it goes -against the grain -and doesn't actually fix the -!problem we're trying to solve.
-I'll be asking you to provide -some property tax relief -with another Band-Aid -while we follow through on -reforms that will finally -change our course.
-These added costs -and just numbers in a budget.
-They have impacts that ripple -throughout the workforce, -economy, communities -and our entire state.
-They make it harder -for young families to stay, -harder for working -!from Vermonters to buy a home, -and harder for employers -to create and keep good jobs.
-They force the working -class and retirees -on a fixed budget to leave -not because they want to, -but because they can't make -the math work.
-They cripple towns and cities -as they delay maintenance -and new investments, -because residents simply -can't afford -more on their tax bills.
-These are the real costs -of maintaining a system -designed for Vermont -that no longer exists.
-So if there's one thing -you take away from the speech -today, it's this -education transformation.
-It's not optional.
-It's essential.
-We've already taken -a critical step forward.
-!In the next few years, Vermont -will join nearly -every other state -using a funding system proven -to produce better outcomes.
-But how we fund education -is just part of the problem.
-And that's -because the old system -is too complex for the -number of students we serve -at our peak.
-In the late 90s, Vermont had -about 107,000 K-12 students.
-Apples to apples.
-Today, we educate -roughly 74,080 thousand.
-When you include pre-K -to serve those kids.
-We have 52 supervisory -unions in 119 districts, -with as few as 200 students, -while some of the highest -performing districts -in the country have 10,000.
-And each -!have their own administration, -!unique systems and fixed costs -for things like pay -and benefits, heating, -electricity, transportation -which all rise over time.
-I believe -most school leaders -are trying their very best, -but the reality is -they have few real options.
-Because while education -spending keeps rising, -!school leaders are also forced -to cut courses, teachers, -staff, extracurricular -activities and maintenance.
-As one superintendent -put it last year.
-We have no more to cut.
-That's not mismanagement.
-It's math.
-And that's the contradiction -of our education system.
-Before 73.
-Year after year, -we pay more to provide less.
-The way our system was built, -our approach for funding -and how we run -it has led to deep inequity.
-Just look at the size -difference.
-Some schools have well over -1000 students.
-Others have less than 50.
-And in those small schools, -!they also offer fewer courses.
-And teachers are stretched -thin, often covering -multiple subjects -and grade levels.
-And because our funding -formula doesn't actually -provide equity, -many schools are underfunded, -even though on average -we have among the highest -per pupil -spending in the country.
-Here are some real examples -to think about -in today's system, a student -in one district can choose -from 102 courses, and -in another a student has 73.
-That's -a few third fewer learning -opportunities -!based only on where they live.
-We also have two schools -in the same county, -one with 700 students, -one with 100.
-The larger one offers 17 -foreign language courses.
-The smaller school -has just four.
-And there are kids -from different districts -who take the same course -at the regional tech center, -but don't get the same credit -towards graduation.
-This isn't meaningful.
-Local control.
-It's significant -inconsistency, unequal -!opportunity, and frankly, it's -just not fair.
-Following through on act 73 -and rightsizing our systems.
-How we get there.
-First, -we need far fewer districts, -each serving -far more students.
-This change will eliminate -!duplicated effort and expenses -!for things like bussing, human -resources, and purchasing, -!which are currently being done -across 52 supervisor -units in 119 districts.
-Importantly, -it will reduce the inequity -I just talked about -because there'll -be more consistent leadership -and accountability.
-It also gives leaders -more levers -to pull in more students, -which means more funding.
-Instead -of having to cut a teacher -from an already understaffed -school, -superintendents -can look across -a larger universe of expenses -and resources -and make strategic decisions -with more options.
-!It also means paying attention -to national averages -and best practices.
-Now, I know -we love our small classrooms, -but data shows students -in larger classes -can and do thrive -throughout the country.
-!So let's streamline our system -so more of the money -we spend goes to our kids.
-It's time to let go -of what we think -is best and act on what -the data actually shows us.
-Best.
-To do this, -the legislature -must prioritize -drawing new district lines, -and it should be -the first order of business -for the committees -of jurisdiction.
-Without this governance -change, -!we won't give kids the Better.
-Education Act -73 was designed to provide.
-And from my perspective, -the recent failure to produce -maps was a political strategy -to preserve the old system.
-Following through -is about keeping our word -to students, -teachers, and taxpayers -who all deserve better.
-So I want to be clear -I will not sign a budget -or an education bill or tax -bill that deviates from act -73 or fails to fix -what's broken.
-Yes, it will mean change.
-And change can be hard.
-As you know, act 73 -does not call for -or mandate school closures.
-But we have to be honest, -the financial and academic -quality benchmarks -it puts in place -!will mean merging some schools -!and repurposing old buildings.
-Here's the thing.
-The status quo -is already closing.
-Schools, but it only happens -when a school is facing years -of declining opportunities -for students.
-In 2020, -when black River High School -closed, -it lost 45% of its student -population in just 15 years, -going from 167 in 2005 -to just 75 in 2020.
-When Windham voted to close -!its elementary school in 2024, -had just 15 students -and Rochester was left with -!two students before it closes.
-High school for good.
-Two students.
-Think about what -they missed out on -prom, study groups, -sports, school plays, -the things that -make high school high school.
-Yet even in these situations, -there were fierce advocates -to keep these schools -open.
-Instead of this slow, -tortuous, -and unmanaged process, -!let's move forward with act 73 -so we can manage change -thoughtfully, strategically, -and with students -best interests -at the forefront.
-The opportunities -are there for us.
-We know there are regions -all across the state that -!have lost hundreds of students -over the last 20 years, -but they still operate -the same number of buildings, -often just a few miles -down the road.
-The same amount of overhead -and administration -for far fewer students, -with far fewer opportunities.
-In some places, -we see kids from -neighboring schools -sharing the soccer field, -but for some, -it would be unthinkable -for them -to share the science lab.
-I know these -are difficult conversations, -but when we're talking about -a better future for our kids, -everything -must be on the table.
-It's worth noting -that Vermont has faced -hard choices before.
-Every union high school -in the state exists -because communities decided -that providing a better -education and saving money -mattered more than operating -inefficient buildings.
-We've also merged -elementary and middle schools -because doing so expanded -opportunity for students -and save money.
-I saw this in my home -town of Barre -in the mid 90s.
-We went from seven -smaller schools to one larger -one that now serves about 800 -students.
-It was very controversial -and really hard for some, -it meant adding a bus system -and kids -couldn't walk to their -neighborhood schools anymore.
-It took a little time -to get used to that reality, -but a couple of years later, -many wondered -why it wasn't done sooner.
-Today, Lincoln School, -where I went to kindergarten -through fifth grade, has been -completely restored, is now -a senior living facility, -and it's still an important -part of the community.
-And all the other buildings -have been repurposed.
-I went to sixth through -eighth grade -at the beautiful -old Spalding Graded School, -which was previously -the high school.
-It's now home to the Vermont -Historical Society.
-And sure, -I have great memories -from going to both school, -but those memories -and my nostalgia shouldn't -!hold back the next generation, -because as a result -of those decisions, -students had more academic -opportunities, -extracurricular options, -and social experiences, -and teachers -benefited from more resources -and better tools.
-That's the promise of act 73.
-But we must follow through.
-I want to speak directly -to teachers for a moment, -because I know you often feel -like we're blaming you -when we talk about -the need to make changes.
-So let's clear the air.
-I know you have a tough job, -and that role of teachers -has changed dramatically -since I was at UVM studying -to be a tech ed teacher.
-I know you have students -with some tough challenges -without the support -they need at home.
-I know in some schools -!you have to do more with less.
-Spending your own money -to create -!a better classroom experience, -or to make sure students -have the supplies they need.
-And I know in some -districts you're underpaid -and overworked, -having to juggle multiple age -groups, multiple subjects.
-And if it wasn't for you -stepping up -to run the afterschool -drama club -or coach basketball, -it doesn't happen -and the kids miss out.
-If we want to build -the best education system -in the nation, -!we must make sure our teachers -have what they need -in every classroom, -every district, -and every school -across the state.
-So I want to be very clear.
-We can no longer ask teachers -to go it alone, -because we all know, -and the data proves, -the most important thing -we can do for our kids -education is expose them -to high quality, -well-resourced teachers -who have the tools to grow -professionally.
-And yes, for -some of you, higher salaries -today, -there's -a $20,000 a year difference -!in our teachers average salary -from the highest paying -to lowest -paying supervisory union.
-But we can close that gap -by following -through on the district maps -required by act 73.
-Finally, making sure teachers -can choose a school -!based on the good they can do, -not the salary -they need to live.
-Better -!supported teachers are the key -to unlocking -the best in our kids.
-I saw that firsthand -when I joined longtime -Northfield teacher Mike -Gonville for Walking -Wednesdays.
-He knew every kid by name, -and you could see -he cared about all of them, -and they cared about him.
-That's -what Dick flies did for me.
-He was a bi tech head teacher -at Spalding -and a -big influence on my life.
-If you want -to see someone instantly -smile, -ask them who -their favorite teacher was.
-So I decided to ask my team -and here's what I got.
-Andrew Cobain -in American history.
-Oxbow.
-Mary Corrigan English.
-Northfield.
-Harvey Dorfman.
-English.
Burn.
Burton.
-!Patti.
Brewer, social studies.
-Mount.
Mansfield.
-John Heinz, English, BFA, -Saint Albans.
-Claire Deloria, French, -Shelburne.
-And limit all.
-Alvarez, a CTE teacher -from Brattleboro.
-And we understand she's -hosting a watch party today.
-So let's give her a round -of applause for being named.
-It gets you all new that -she was named Vermont's 2026 -teacher of the year.
-CTE has come a long ways -in the last decade or two.
-At 73.
-It's not an attack on -teachers.
-It's a recognition you're -not getting what you need.
-It's a blueprint to make sure -every teacher works -!in a system that supports you, -so you can focus on the job -you signed up for.
-Helping students -reach their full potential.
-The old system is not only -failing our teachers, -it's failing our kids.
-Just this past fall, -!The Boston Globe reported that -over the last decade, -no state fell as far -in early reading as Vermont.
-Ten years ago, -we were in the top -five in the nation -in fourth grade reading.
-In 2024, we ranked 37th.
-And the same pattern repeats -across grade and subject.
-And if that doesn't -give you pause, -here's another benchmark -from Mississippi.
-It's a rural state like us, -!but has even bigger challenges -with double -the child poverty rate.
-Mississippi -spends thousands of dollars -less per student than we do.
-And while they educate -five times as many kids, -they have roughly the same -number of districts as us.
-Now, before you start -rolling your eyes and writing -this off, you should know -today their high school -graduation rate -is higher than Vermont's.
-And on national assessments, -they score similar or better.
-Less money per student, -fewer districts, and equal -or better education outcomes.
-Trending -in the right direction.
-!Let that sink in for a moment.
-Mississippi -was once -at the bottom of the charts.
-And now, -because they're honest -about their problem and set -clear education priorities -and then follow through.
-They're making real progress.
-It's being called -the Mississippi Miracle.
-And good for them.
-We should all applaud them -for choosing to change course -and putting their -kids above everything else.
-And if you join me -and bipartisan leaders -in both the House and Senate -to push through the noise, -fear and division -and finish what we committed -to last year, -we can do the same.
-If we realign -our structure, -standards and accountability -with the number -!and needs of today's students.
-We can deliver on the real -change laid out in act 73, -in the new system.
-Every child will have access -to the same high -quality education -!and with a foundation formula, -will guarantee students -with similar needs -get the same funding -no matter where they live.
-We'll have strong early -literacy, a full curriculum -with arts, sciences, foreign -!languages and career pathways.
-!Whether a kid chooses college, -the military, public service -or the trades, -they'll they'll all be -supported and valued equally.
-For teachers.
-It means equitable pay, -professional development, -and more time to teach.
-For communities, -it means schools that attract -families, support employers -and add to the economy.
-And for Vermont, -it means a system that's -financially sustainable.
-So education costs no longer.
-Crowd out -!all the other important needs.
-I know the pressure -you're under -with calls to delay, -to water things down -or stop this transition -altogether.
-But we've been down that road -before.
-And every time -!we bend to the vocal minority, -these problems get worse.
-We didn't pass at 73 -because it was easy.
-We did it because solving -this problem matters.
-And what you do next matters -even more.
-Remember that Boston Globe -article I mentioned earlier?
-The headline was New England -schools are failing -and nobody seems to care.
-Well, I care, -and I know those of you -came together to pass act 73.
-Care to.
-So?
So let's do what's hard -and follow -through this session -to deliver on the education -promise -Vermonters -are currently paying for.
-And our kids deserve.
-In 1892, -Governor Levi Fuller -signed the vicious act, -consolidating over 2000 -local school districts -into about 251 per town.
-Ironically, -the goals all those years ago -!for the same as they are today -equal education, -!increased support for teachers -and better resources -for every school.
-You can tell by its nickname -!the criticisms haven't changed -much either.
-!If nothing else, we Vermonters -certainly are consistent.
-But they knew -then what we know today.
-A static system -will never be perfect, -and the work of education -!reform will never be finished.
-Because when it comes -!to the institution responsible -for educating our children, -we have an obligation -to constantly work -to make it better.
-If we get this right, -it will improve the lives -of all Vermonters.
-Because as I said earlier, -education transformation -is not optional.
-It's essential -to growing our economy, -to building a strong -skilled workforce, -to supporting businesses.
-It's essential -to revitalizing downtowns -and providing more housing -in the communities -that have been left behind.
-Behind.
-It's essential to making -Vermont more affordable, -keeping and attracting -more people to live here.
-Reversing our demographics -and adding more taxpayers -instead of always -looking for new taxes.
-And there's no better way -!to protect our most vulnerable -than making sure everyone, -no matter what hand -they were dealt as a kid, -has a path out of poverty -and a solid chance -to make it in the world.
-On New Year's -Day, just after midnight, -the first Vermonter of 2026 -was born -in Newport and North -Country Hospital.
-If we're lucky, -she'll stay here and grow up -among the mountains -and valleys.
-We love, and communities -that still believe -!in showing up for one another.
-She won't know the debates -we're having today, -but she will have to deal -with the choices we make -or don't make.
-If we have the courage -to finish our work, -she will enter a local school -capable -of supporting her -from cradle to career.
-Helping her -find that pathway to success.
-We can give this -to every child -in every town, -all across the state.
-All we have to do -is keep our word -and push forward -into the headwinds -that true progress -has always encountered.
-To strengthen -!Vermont for future generations -and change the fate -of this brave -little state for the better.
-Will the committee please -reassemble -and escort the governor -from the chamber.
-[applause] -Before we gavel out, I'd -like to remind those present.
-Please remain where you are -until the Senate leaves -and the Doorkeepers escort -!our guests out of the chamber.
-There being no further -business, I do hereby declare -!this joint assembly dissolved.
Support for PBS provided by:
Vermont Public Specials is a local public television program presented by Vermont Public















