Story written by:
Why Pilots are More Scared Than Excited About Unmanned Aircraft
To technology geeks, the thought of a sky dotted with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles might seem like the coolest thing in the world. But to a lot of pilots, the prospect is a scary one. When a tiny bird hits an airplane, it can do some pretty serious damage; what happens when an unmanned metal vehicle gets in its way? It could spell disaster.
"We're totally opposed to any type of flying vehicle or aircraft that doesn't have someone actively at the controls," says Gail Dunham, president of the U.S. National Air Disaster Alliance and Foundation. "It's common sense, right?"
Pilots like Dunham are concerned that as more Unmanned Aerial Vehicles—or Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UASs), as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) likes to call them—take to the skies, they will put airplanes and pilots at serious risk. The FAA awarded twice as many flying authorization certificates to UASs in 2006 as it did in 2005, and a similar doubling is expected by the end of this year. "Interest is growing in a broad range of uses, from aerial photography to surveying land and crops, to monitoring forest fires and environmental conditions, to protecting borders and ports against intruders," says agency spokesperson Les Farr.
But Farr admits that certification standards for UASs have not yet been developed. In 2005, the Associated Administrator for Aviation Safety asked the Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, a government-industry forum for the development of consensus-based technical standards, to provide recommendations on how to proceed with UAS regulations. As of yet, however, no decisions have been made. The biggest issues, says Farr, involve developing standards for UASs with regards to their abilities to detect, sense and avoid other aircraft, and also their ability to communicate, command and control.
These are key issues for pilots, too. "One of the main concerns we have is that these unmanned aircraft systems do not have any standard or sophisticated see-and-avoid equipment that is equivalent to the manned operator," says Heidi Williams, the director air traffic services at the US Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. In addition, she says, there has to be contingency plan that can keep the skies safe if a UAS loses communication with the ground. Pilots want to know that at all times, "the system can operate in an equivalent level of safety and similar to a manned aircraft operation," she says.
The FAA agrees and promises to ensure the safety of our skies, even if regulations aren't yet in place and others are skeptical. "The US enjoys the safest air transportation system in the world," Farr says. "Ensuring the continuation of this safety record is the top priority for the FAA and, therefore, the safe integration of UASs into the National Airspace System is our biggest concern."







Features RSS Feed







6 Comments
6 Posts
+ Add Comment
10.25.07 7:26 AM PDT
mike elyea
Having worked as an engineer with UAS for the past 3 years, I can say that the FAA has been even MORE stringent with our systems and operations than virtually any civilian aircraft now in the skies. And by the way, most civilian airliners are flown almost excusively by the same type of autopilots that we use!
11.25.07 6:57 PM PST
Randy Krohn
I would like to read comments on the future use of UAV's as a platform to perform task' such as aerial surveying and photogrammetry. Being involved in this field my thoughts are will the pilot be needed in the future or can current UAV technology perform this type of flying safetly and if not now how long can we expect to see the technology available to do this type of work?
12.1.07 9:05 PM PST
Fergus Elliott
Who are we kidding here.These UAV's are not about crop surveilance etc...They are no doubt strictly for control of the masses.Aren't you all aware that all your rights have been eroded by amendments to the Constitution.These UAV's are nothing more than an infringement of your personal privacy.All other talk of them is nothing more than a distraction ,a well orchestrated distraction
3.5.08 8:45 AM PST
Bob Trojan
I sincerely hope that was just a bad joke on your part Mr. Elliott.
7.29.08 12:37 PM PDT
Josh A.
@Bob Totally
@Fergus Spy satellites have been watching you since the '60s. So as far as you're concerned, your constitutional rights were eroded looooong ago.
4.8.09 9:17 AM PDT
anthony leporatti
UAVS such as the Predator RQ1(which was the first uav to be armed with live munitions) Are the fighting force of the future. The typical uav used in the military is under constant surveillance and control by a trained professional. Each day advancements are made in the technology of unmanned vehicles, making them practical for military and private citizen use. To say uavs are a threat to commercial airlines will only slow the developement of future advancement to better uav technology.
Post your comment