My Father, My Brother, and Me

Producers' Forum

Video Stories - Watch short stories Dave Iverson and Michael Schwarz filmed over the past two years while making My Father, My Brother, and Me.

Will Stem Cells Be the Answer?

By David Iverson on January 20, 2009 11:26 AM | Comments (2)

Well, today we have a new President! And while President Obama has plenty to contend with early on, it's widely expected that one early action he'll take will be to reverse the stem cell funding policy initiated by President Bush in 2001. As I mentioned in my last post, our film chronicles the long contentious debate over federal stem cell funding. But beyond the controversy, where does the science itself stand? Parkinson's is often cited as a principal beneficiary of stem cell science. That's because if stem cells could be nurtured into becoming dopamine producing neurons, they could help make up for the cells that die in Parkinson's. The trick, as Harvard neuroscientist Ole Isacson explained to me when I interviewed him, is to grow just the right cells. It's a complex process that Isacson says is a bit like cultivating just the right seeds for your garden. (To read more about his work, check out this overview of the projects his lab does and this article.)

But one of the things I learned while working on the film is that Parkinson's is complicated. While stem cells may well prove to be a source of dopamine production, there are other symptoms that frequently plague people with PD that can't be easily explained by a neurotransmitter deficiency ... everything from loss of sense of smell to constipation. Bill Langston -- head of the Parkinson's Institute and another voice in our film -- has some useful thoughts on the complexity and what lies ahead in this article

So as we begin the new Obama era,  it's worth remembering that as all of us know, Parkinson's is no easy foe, and the task ahead will be daunting. Yet I also think we can be hopeful -- no matter our politics -- about what science, in ways still unimagined, will bring us in the years ahead.

 

2 Comments

Paul said on January 25, 2009 5:00 PM:

I think the best results for researchers will eventually come from "adult stem cells". The embryonic stem cell research for 20 years has came up with no cures for any disease while adult stem cells have many cures. The adult stem cells can come from your own body and won't be rejected by your body.
Jeremy Gerstle said on February 3, 2009 7:11 PM:

In response to Paul - you are misinformed about embryonic stem cell research as are so many Americans. Embryonic stem cell research hasn't taken place in this country for 20 years, it's barely been in existence for even 12 years and it hasn't received any federal money for the last 10 years. How could it possibly have led to cures? It is a science still in it's infancy that has been stalled by religious groups and misguided politics. Unfortunately, those who are deep opposition to embryonic stem cell research on moral/religious grounds have created a sea of disinformation meant to mislead the public. Meanwhile, traditional media, including PBS, has done little to educate and inform the public in a way that fosters open and intelligent debate on the issue.

Leave a comment


posted january 29, 2009

my father, my brother, and me home page · watch online · dvd/transcript · credits · site map
FRONTLINE series home · privacy policy · journalistic guidelines

FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation.
Web Site Copyright ©1995-2014 WGBH Educational Foundation