Martin Solomon talks about Boston's famed medical institutions like a refugee
returning to a once-idyllic, now war-torn city. Though the names of the old
Harvard teaching hospitals - Beth Israel, Deaconess, Brigham, Mass General -
still resonate with prestige, the truth is that the days are gone of academic
camaraderie, unfettered patient access to any specialist and any institution,
and treatment of almost any condition at any cost. Now, hospitals have merged,
patients must not leave prescribed networks, and doctors must adhere to the
bottom line at all cost.
Jennings is the field producer of FRONTLINE's documentary, "Dr. Solomon's Dilemma."
Patient care, Solomon says, has been negatively impacted. "We've gone from
being the Mecca of medicine to a medical Beirut," he says.
With his trademark bow tie, Solomon cuts a slight figure as he goes on his
rounds at Beth Israel Deaconess, the hospital that resulted from the 1996
merger of two famed Harvard teaching hospitals under the aegis of the CareGroup
corporation. In the quiet, early morning hallways - Solomon starts his daily
rounds no later than 5 a.m. - the doctor carefully checks in with his
hospitalized patients, reviewing their treatments and medications. Then he goes
to his Beacon Street office, opening it up for a first patient visit by 7 a.m.
For the next 10 hours, he will see on average 35 patients, receive 100 phone
calls and answer 50 email messages. He seems tireless.
For that immense load, Solomon has been rewarded with recognition that few
primary care doctors achieve in their local community. If a patient at Beth
Israel does not have Solomon as a physician, chances are they've heard of him.
He's a native Bostonian, received his medical degree from Tufts University, and
did his residency at the old New England Deaconess. He has one of the largest
primary care practices in Boston. He's been rated as the best family physician
in Boston by Boston Magazine several times in a row. And he is the
doctor to many Beth Israel Deaconess physicians.
Solomon's renown has meant that he is often tapped for leadership rolls within
the hospital. One of his newest titles: Pod Leader. It may sound alien, but it
is this role that has thrust Solomon and many other doctors into a new gray
area, where physicians are making health care decisions for their patients
based not just on treatment criteria, but on financial criteria. In the United
States, it is estimated that 60 percent of doctors are at some financial risk
for the cost of care of their patients. The numbers are growing, increasingly
forcing doctors to ask tough ethical questions about the quality of the
treatment they give if they must also consider its cost.
Dr. Solomon sold his medical practice to CareGroup in 1998, meaning that he
committed to sending his patients to Beth Israel Deaconess (BID) for medical
care. Around the same time, doctors in the CareGroup system, including Solomon,
began to manage the financial risk of many of their patients, effectively
taking on the role previously held by HMOs. Doctors wanted the control over
care decisions, which they had ceded to managed care companies during the
1990s. But they also wanted a part of the profits HMOs had received by forcing
doctors and hospitals to cut costs and become more efficient. CareGroup
doctors, like doctor groups in other areas of the country, have tried to force
themselves to become more efficient by pushing the financial risk as close to
the doctor as possible. Pods, small groups of doctors, are the result.
Pod 11 is the congregation of 11 doctors, including Dr. Solomon, into a risk
unit. Not only do these physicians answer for the care of the patients in their
practices, they also are responsible for shouldering the financial risk of
9,000 "covered lives" - insurance jargon for patients. The doctors' "downside
exposure" can be minimal, as little as 10 percent, or it can be total, at 100
percent, depending on the insurance contract they have negotiated. The concept
is relatively simple, according to CareGroup Medical Director Kim Saal: "At the
end of the year, doctors either share in the savings or deficit."
During bi-weekly pod meetings, Solomon presides over discussions centered
primarily around keeping costs down: Applying peer pressure to minimize
out-of-network referrals; educating doctors to prescribe cheaper prescriptions;
encouraging colleagues to cut back on diagnostic testing. Pod discussions are
often centered around doctor performance data, collected electronically by the
hospital, to see who can save the pod money. Every prescription, every
referral, every test ordered by these physicians is documented, tabulated,
collated and then distributed as a report card to the doctors.
It is Tuesday evening, and Solomon is preparing for a Pod meeting during which
Pod 11 would for the first time receive data about its efficiency and
performance. "As pod director, I'm supposed to cajole people into a more
responsible behavior - my colleagues, not only my patients. I don't enjoy doing
it, but I have to or I lose money. We never make the pharmaceutical targets.
I'm killing myself to be even, but I can't take any more from my patients."
Minutes later, Solomon goes to the waiting room of Dr. Pastor's office, where
10 of the 11 Pod physicians sit in a circle to discuss patients. What is
quickly apparent is that the majority of the discussion is not about the actual
care of the patient, but the cost of the care.
News is received on three fronts. First, the physicians talk about "leakage,"
or doctors letting patients go to a rival, out-of-network hospital, where
everything done to the patient is out of the care and financial control the
primary care doctor. ("It's okay to say 'No,'" says Solomon). Next comes a
pharmacy specialist from the hospital, who is making pod visits to hand out
efficiency scores and talk about ways of doing a better job of keeping costs in
line. Finally, Dr. Susan Frankl, a member of Pod 11 and designated "medical
director" for the Secure Horizons Medicare contract - which has put these
doctors at 100 percent risk - gives a report on the pod's financial performance
during the third quarter of 1999. The results are not good.
Dr. Frankl is next, and she gives bad news: "We lost $77,000 on Secure Horizons
patients during the last quarter. If we don't make it up during this quarter,
we'll be writing a check to Tufts (the HMO that administers the Secure Horizons
There is a collective gasp in the room.
"I'm sorry," Dr. Frankl says. "We just had a lot of sick patients."
The Pod discussion is a long way from Solomon's medical training at Tufts
Medical School, where he was taught that cost was no concern when it came to
treating patients. But even back then, Solomon knew that there were problems in
the system that would someday have to be addressed. Two books he read
influenced him to start thinking in less black-and-white terms about health
care delivery: Who Shall Live?: Health, Economics, and Social
Choice, written in 1974 by Victor R. Fuchs; and 1984's Social
Transformation of American Medicine by Paul Starr. Both foresaw a system
of care under the fee-for-service model that was set to collapse under its own
weight of treatment excess and out of control costs in American medicine.
If Solomon is not one to gloss over the extravagances of the old,
fee-for-service system in which he has spent the majority of his career, he is
also not one to think that the current system is radically better. Managed care
did tighten up the system, and, he says, in many ways did improve care. But
with the more recent trend of doctors becoming risk-holders, he finds himself
in competition with patients for the income pool. It is the worst part of the
job for Solomon, and it has made him wonder where the passion for doctoring has
gone. "Doctors are seeing patients as adversaries," he says. "To say that this
stuff does not cloud your judgment (when dealing with patients) would be a lie.
The patients are beginning to understand this. "
Even harder than pushing his patients is explaining the cost constraints to his
patients. The delicate balancing act often loses out to a simple trick: Lying.
"We lie to the patients. We're always making up stories because of what is
happening: 'It's really a better drug,' or 'It's easier to take, just once a
day.' If it's a treatment referral, I just say the doctors in our system are
just as good as anywhere. That's not a lie, but it is a far cry from what it
used to be like, when I could send anyone anywhere."
inside the dilemma ·
financial incentives ·
cost v. care
ask the producer ·
producer's notebook ·
tapes & transcripts ·