| |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||
Until recently she served on the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, where she heard both juvenile and adult cases. A state court trial judge since 1982, she presided over Manny's fitness case. Do you think any kid ever belongs in adult court?
Yes. . . . I have come across some young people who are so sophisticated and
who have committed such heinous crimes that the adult system is the place for
them to be. I haven't come across a lot, but there have been some. . . . It
can happen, and it does happen. . . .
Oh, sure. Yes.. I've had sociopaths in court here. I've had only a few of them, and I've been doing this for a long time. I can only really count maybe a half a dozen, and only two in particular that I would be very frightened to see on the street. But I see them from time to time. Some people believe that no kid belongs in adult court. For one reason, they can't be tried by a jury of their peers, because people of their age are not allowed to serve. And some people would argue that, just by definition, they cannot receive a fair hearing in adult court because of that. What do you think? They may be right. Knowing what you know about the lack of services if a child is convicted in adult court, knowing that there aren't going to be the kinds of counseling and therapeutic and educational services available, do you feel, in essence, that you're writing somebody off when you send them off? Oh, absolutely. Yes. It's not a good feeling. It hurts. When you have a kid who has committed a serious offense, someone who's caused harm--most likely a crime of violence--what makes you keep them in the juvenile system?
I'll keep them if I think I can make a difference. And the difference may not
manifest itself for many, many years. But if I think there is a good
likelihood that we can get this kid off the path he's on and onto a better
path, then it's worth the time and the effort. Even if it's a long shot, I'm
willing to take it.
That's a hard question, and the reason it's a hard question is because systemically, my belief is we could do it all better. . . . I don't think a lot of adults belong in adult detention, quite frankly. I think we could do a better job with that. If you look at recidivism rates throughout the country, this punitive system is not working. It doesn't work. From one standpoint, if you lock people up for life and they never get out, I guess you could say that works in terms of public safety as to that person, but it certainly has not proven to have any impact on recidivism . . . . So we have this incredibly ineffective adult system, and now we want to take kids, and put them into what we already know is ineffective. . . . Why? Why? That makes no sense to me. We want to replicate what we're doing for adults, which we know doesn't work, for kids, when we have an opportunity to possibly impact their lives.
Now, another way of getting at that same question is that I do feel that there
are people that are so damaged that they are damaged beyond repair, that
there's not a good intervention that you can do to salvage them. Whatever
their internal stuff is that enables them to connect in a meaningful way, it's
broken. But I think that's a very small, I mean extremely small, percentage of
people that I've run across, especially in the juvenile system.
from both sides of the bench · facts & stats · related report: little criminals discussion · synopsis · press · tapes & transcripts · credits FRONTLINE · wgbh · pbs web site copyright 1995-2008 WGBH educational foundation | |||||||||||||||||||