| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One of the first actions taken during the juvenile court process is determining whether a case should be processed in the criminal justice system rather than in juvenile court. All states have in place judicial mechanisms through which certain juvenile offenders may be tried as adults in the criminal system. These "transfer" provisions fall into three general categories, depending on where the responsibility for the decision lies. In most States, cases referred to juvenile court that meet certain criteria may be transferred to criminal court upon the authorization of the juvenile court judge. This mechanism is known as "judicial waiver," since the judge is "waiving" the juvenile court's jurisdiction and giving the case over to the criminal system. Almost every state has statutory judicial waiver provisions which grant juvenile judges the authority to transfer juvenile offenders out of the juvenile system. Depending on the state, this authority is granted with varying degrees of flexibility. In some cases, the decision to transfer is left entirely to the judge's discretion. In others, there is a presumption in favor of transfer which can be rebutted by the child's attorney. In some, transfer is mandatory once the judge determines that certain criteria have been met.
The terminology for judicial waiver also varies from state to state; some call
it "certification," "remand," or "bind over" for criminal prosecution. In any
case, it is the most common statutory mechanism for trying juveniles in
criminal court.
Most states have more than one mechanism for trying juveniles to adult court.
An increasing number exclude by statute certain serious or violent crimes from
juvenile court court jurisdiction, providing the offender meets a minimum age
requirement. This effectively mandates the transfer of juveniles who commit
those offences to adult criminal court. Many states also exclude repeat
juvenile offenders from the juvenile system. In 1997, 28 states had such
provisions.
In some states, a combination of the youth's age, offense, and prior record
places certain juvenile offenders under the jurisdiction of both the juvenile
and criminal courts. In these situations where the courts have concurrent
jurisdiction, the prosecutor is given the authority to decide which court will
initially handle the case. Transfer under these circumstances is known as
"prosecutorial waiver."
In 1997, 22 states had provisions for transferring juveniles to criminal court
which did not specify a minimum age. For those that did specify a minimum age,
the most common (16 states) was age 14. Two states, Kansas and Vermont, set the
minimum age as low as 10. In many states, once a juvenile is tried and
convicted as an adult, he or she must be prosecuted in criminal court for any
subsequent offenses.
Traditionally, discretionary judicial waiver was the most common means for juveniles to be transferred into the adult system. Each case was examined on an individual basis, with the judge taking into consideration such factors as the juvenile's likelihood of rehabilitation, his or her background, and the circumstances of the offense. Increasingly, however, state legislatures are removing this judicial discretion from the system by enacting mandatory waiver or exclusion statutes which eliminate the case-specific consideration of the discretionary waiver system. The number of juvenile cases waived into adult criminal court peaked in 1994 when 11,700 cases were transferred. In 1997, this number was down to 8400.
from both sides of the bench · facts & stats · related report: little criminals discussion · synopsis · press · tapes & transcripts · credits FRONTLINE · wgbh · pbs web site copyright 1995-2008 WGBH educational foundation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||