What is it about the computer that makes it become such an obsession for
This young hacker was caught breaking into NASA's computers and sentenced to
six months in jail. The government says that at one time, he took possession of
$1.7 million in software. Because of his age, FRONTLINE is protecting his
Well, it's power at your fingertips. You can control all these computers from
the government, from the military, from large corporations. And if you know
what you're doing, you can travel through the internet at your will, with no
restrictions. That's power; it's a power trip.
Why is that so important?
Well, everybody likes to feel in control.
In my time, they did it by playing hockey or football. How does the computer
It's intellectual. It stimulates my mind. It's a challenge.
How hard was it for you to get into some blue-chip locations?
The government didn't take too many measures for security on most of their
computers. They lack some serious computer security, and the hard part is
learning it. I know Unix and C like the back of my hand, because I studied all
these books, and I was on the computer for so long. But the hard part isn't
getting in. It's learning to know what it is that you're doing.
And how do you learn that?
Oh, by reading, by talking to people. And by spending so much time on the
computer, learning how it works, learning the source code and the programs and
I gather that there's quite a network of hackers out there. Do you guys
share information and secrets over the internet?
If someone told me that a 16-year-old could crack into NASA or into the U.S.
Department of Defense, I'd say, "Sure. In the movies, maybe." How long did it
take you to do that?
I was learning about computers and Unix and programming for two years. I was
learning how to program in C for about a year. If I were targeting a computer,
it would take between a few hours to a few weeks of looking around to find the
So is it just the rush of getting in there, of doing something smarter than
they do? Or did you find anything there that was of interest to you?
Generally, the thrill is over once you've realized that you're on the computer
and that you can do whatever you want--but it's not downloading their
information, because usually it's pointless, bureaucratic stuff you don't need
to know. . . .
When you start out, you sort of poke at various cyberfences and walls.
You're just looking for the soft spots. You don't target a place because it's
got something that you want--it's just that it's a challenge?
I would target a place because it looks like a challenge. Like, if I say, "The
navy has a computer network in Jacksonville, maybe that would be fun to poke
around." And then I'd target them. I'd look at their computers and I'd see
what I can do there.
That doesn't sound like mischief. Sometimes I think you guys are like the
Not at all. Well, first of all, I was just looking around, playing around.
What was fun for me was a challenge to see what I could pull off. But then
there's other people that go into corporate web sites, government web sites, and
change it. That's closer to what you're talking about-- that's mischievous.
But I didn't do stuff like that.
You could have, though.
Oh, yes. I could have gotten a lot of recognition. . . .
A lot of attention was given to the fact that you downloaded software
relating to the international space station. Could you have done anything with
No. It was for the environmental control program. Who wants that-- you can
play with the air conditioner, or what? . . . The code itself was crappy . . .
certainly not worth $1.7 million like they claimed. The only reason I was
downloading the source code in the first place was because I was studying C
programming. And what better way to learn than reading software written by the
Was it a big shock to you that the government was using such inferior code
for such important work?
Yes, but you get used to it. I'm not surprised anymore when I see the failures
of the government.
When did you first suspect that they knew you were snooping around?
Well, I never knew that they would actually come to my house. That was a total
shock to me. Sometimes I would get kicked off a computer. and I'd figure, "Oh,
great, the admin figured something was up and re-installed the software, added
a little security, and forgot about it, because they don't care that I'm here.
They just fix it and move on," which is reasonable. Nothing happened to me in
the weeks following, so, great. They realized that all it takes is five
minutes at the keyboard and they can make a computer secure. And they didn't
care. I would email the system administrators sometimes and tell them that
their computers were vulnerable. I would tell them how to break in, and how to
fix the problems. I'd give them advice, and they would never follow it. Three
weeks later I would go in and I still had access to their computers.
Even after you told them that there's a hole in the fence?
Oh, more than that. I told them how to fix the hole in the fence, and they
didn't respond, so I figured that they didn't care.
But meanwhile, they've got all the resources of the government out looking
for this guy.
And they should have been spending those resources on computer security.
How did they catch you?
They haven't told me exactly how they caught me. They sealed the affidavit for
the search warrant. They said it was sealed for national security or some BS
reason, but from what I understood, they probably called one of my friends, who
gave information about me. Then they came to my house. My mom woke me from bed
and said that the FBI was at the door. It's kind of unnerving. . . . I walk
out and I see everybody with vests that say Federal Agents and NASA and DOD on
the back with guns and all that good stuff.
. . . Were you scared?
No, I was just wondering what was up, and then I saw that their shirt said
And they walked out with all your computers?
They took me into a room in the back and questioned me for a few hours. And I
admitted everything that I did, and I said, "Yes, I'm sorry. I won't do it
again." I told them how I did it, what I did. They told me not to do it
again, and if I do it again, I'll leave in handcuffs, but for now, they don't
consider me a criminal, and that I just shouldn't do it again. And then they
told me that they're taking my computers for investigative reasons. They said
they don't need to read me my Miranda rights because they're not making an
arrest. They're just investigating,
So what did they take out of there?
They took five of my computers. I had a nice little network going. They took
my Palm Pilot, my CDs, my "Star Trek" book.
Your "Star Trek" book?
My "Star Trek" book, yes. Don't ask me why.
And when did it get serious?
. . . I didn't hear from them for another three months. Then, three months
later, they had a little meeting. I talked to the prosecuting attorney. They
said they might press charges. He said that I might get probation . . . but
that they were unsure of what they're going to do. Then, in July, over the
summer, I was in Israel. And I got a phone call from my father, who said that
they wanted to put me in jail for six months.
Let's think about it from the other side's point of view. They don't know
that it's some nice guy from a nice neighborhood. . . . It could be a real bad
guy in Baghdad, or wherever. What are they supposed to do when they find
somebody snooping around inside their systems?
Well, first of all, they should be responsible enough to provide adequate
security from the start. But once they find out that it's some harmless kid .
. . I think the appropriate response would be perhaps to take my computers away
like they did, and leave it at that. They could tell me that I can't use the
internet for a while, to teach me a lesson, teach me that they actually do care
about what I'm doing, and that I shouldn't do it again. But they shouldn't put
the youth of America in jail.
How does the prospect of sitting in jail for six months affect you?
First of all--six months. While it's not as long as some other sentences, it's
still a long time. And that's six months of me being surrounded by people that
did these actual crimes, did bad things to other people, to humanity. And I'm
surrounding myself with these people that are lower than myself. Not to sound
arrogant, but they lack morals, and it would be degrading to my character . .
. and I'm worried.
Are you trying to tell me that you don't think the crime you committed is on
the same order? . . .
Not at all. This is just harmless exploration. It's not a violent act or a
destructive act. It's nothing.
They say that, at one point, you took possession of $1.7 million worth of
software, and that you made them shut down and spend weeks with 13 or 14
important government computers down. That sounds serious.
Well, I think the price of the software is irrelevant, because the government
overpays for everything. But it was source code that wouldn't even compile.
The computer people know what I'm talking about. It was source code that
wouldn't even compile without the proper equipment, or maybe it was just bad
coding, I don't know. But the only reason I downloaded it was for the sake of
learning what it is that they're doing, how they program, their techniques.
And you learned basically that it was no good?
Yes. They did stupid, stupid things that an experienced programmer would know
not to do. But as for claiming that the addition of computer security is
damages? That demonstrates a serious lack of responsibility on the
government's behalf. The failure to put adequate security up from the start,
from as soon as they turn the computers on, is a lack of responsibility. And
then they cover up their mistakes. They call it damages when a computer
enthusiast such as myself demonstrates their ineptitude.
What did that teach you about the state of computer security, and about the
ability of public authorities and government people to police the security of
the computer systems out there?
I certainly learned that there's a serious lack of computer security. If
there's a will, there's a way, and if a computer enthusiast such as myself was
determined to get into anywhere, be it the Pentagon or Microsoft, it's been
demonstrated that it's possible and they will do it. And there's next to
nothing they can do about it, because there's people with skill out there, and
they'll get what they want.
How would you assess the skill levels of the law enforcement people who
eventually came knocking at your door?
Okay, they got lucky, because I didn't take any measures whatsoever to hide
myself. I didn't cover my tracks at all, and had I done that, they would not
have been able to catch me. If I wanted to, I could have hidden myself, but I
didn't think I was doing anything wrong, so, why bother?
You could have escaped detection?
I could have.
You could have done a lot of damage?
If one was so inclined, you could have deleted files, or put a virus up or sell
information to foreigners. You could perform a denial of service attack and
cause the computers to stop performing. Someone could do any number of things
that I did not do.
Could you have done those things?
I could have.
They couldn't have stopped you? And they couldn't have caught you?
No. They could not have caught me.
What are you going to do now? People of my generation would ask if you've
learned your lesson.
I've learned my lesson. I shouldn't do stuff like that.
But it seems to me that the big lesson is just how vulnerable everybody is
to this technology.
It's a lesson to us all.
What are you going to do about it? Are you going to try and fix it?
Yes, maybe I'll start a computer security company.
home · who are hackers? · risks of the internet · who's responsible · how to be vigilant · interviews
discussion · video excerpts · synopsis · press · tapes · credits
FRONTLINE · wgbh · pbs online
some photos copyright ©2001 photodisc
web site copyright 1995-2013 WGBH educational foundation