What do you think? Leave a respectful comment.

Former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton in New York. File photo by Mike Segar/Reuters

What John Bolton could mean for Trump’s foreign policy

President Donald Trump said Thursday he was replacing national security adviser H.R. McMaster with former U.N. ambassador and longtime Fox News commentator John Bolton — the third person to hold that position in 14 months.

The move comes 10 days after President Trump fired Rex Tillerson as secretary of state, nominating CIA Director Mike Pompeo to take his place.

This leaves Mr. Trump with two new members of his national security team, at a time when he’s preparing for a historic meeting with North Korea over its nuclear program.

Supporters say the addition of Bolton will lead to more aggressive foreign policy. Critics, like Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., say they “hear the drumbeats of war.”

Here’s what we know about where Bolton stands on the issues and how that could influence Trump’s foreign policy.

North Korea

A combination photo of U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Photos by Kevin Lamarque and KCNA/Handout via Reuters

A combination photo of U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Photos by Kevin Lamarque and KCNA/Handout via Reuters

One of Bolton’s earliest tests will come as Trump prepares for a meeting with Kim Jong Un, which is scheduled for sometime before May.

In late February, Bolton wrote an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, titled “The Legal Case for Striking North Korea First.” Bolton “has derided the planned Trump-Kim Jong Un summit as useless and a delaying tactic by Kim as he pursues nuclear weapons,” said Cliff Kupchan, chairman of Eurasia Group.

“The Trump-Kim summit, if it still happens at all, will end quickly in acrimony, setting the stage for American military action,” tweeted Michael McFaul, former U.S. ambassador to Russia. “That was my fear even before Bolton and Pompeo were added to the team, but even more probably now.”


FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks about Iran and the Iran nuclear deal in the Diplomatic Room of the White House in Washington, DC, U.S., October 13, 2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo - RC161A213160

President Donald Trump speaks about the Iran nuclear deal at the White House on Oct. 13, 2017. Photo by Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

With Bolton, the Iran nuclear deal is “in even more trouble” than it was before, Kupchan said. “He’s a fierce opponent of the Iran nuclear deal. In 2015, before the deal, Bolton penned an op-ed titled “To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran.”

Trump has threatened to pull the U.S. out of the Iran nuclear deal if European allies do not fix its “terrible flaws.” He waived sanctions against Iran in January, but the next deadline to waive sanctions comes on May 12 and that will be the real test.

Trump’s position has always been “fix it or nix it” on Iran, said James Carafano, vice president of foreign and defense policy studies at the Heritage Foundation. “I think the reason Tillerson was let go was because Tillerson was adamant about negotiating something with the [European allies] that was less than the fix than the president wanted.”

But “there is no way North Korea is going to negotiate with us if we pull out of the Iran deal,” which was multilateral and the stakes were lower, said David Rothkopf, an author and professor at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. “That means both Iran and North Korea are going to very quickly get hotter. In both cases, Bolton has advocated preemptive strikes.”


U.S. President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin talk during the family photo session at the APEC Summit in Danang, Vietnam November 11, 2017. REUTERS/Jorge Silva - RC1B1EDB0E40

President Donald Trump and Russia’s President Vladimir Putin talk during the family photo session at the APEC Summit in Danang, Vietnam on Nov. 11, 2017. Photo by Jorge Silva/Reuters

While the U.S. has imposed sanctions on Russia under Trump, including a new set earlier this week for cyber intrusion related to the 2016 elections, Bolton has been more direct in criticizing Russia than Trump, writing on Twitter recently that the country’s recent election “was a chance for #Putin to practice election meddling on his own elections so he can do it better elsewhere.” Trump congratulated Russian President Vladimir Putin on his re-election in a phone call from the White House.

Bolton also tweeted that “The #NATO alliance must have a very strong response to the poisoning of a former #Russian spy in Great Britain.”

But Bolton would probably temper his rhetoric on Russia in his new role, McFaul said. “Bolton is not going to spoil his relationship with Trump over Russia.”

United Nations

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley testifies to the House Foreign Affairs Committee on "Advancing U.S. Interests at the United Nations" in Washington

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley has been vocal about pushing for reforms in the U.N. Photo by Joshua Roberts/Reuters

Bolton has a longstanding record of wanting to push reforms on the United Nations, similar to current U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley, Carafano said. In 1994, before becoming U.N. ambassador in a recess appointment from 2005 to 2006, Bolton said of the U.N. headquarters in New York: “If it lost 10 stories, it wouldn’t make a bit of difference.”

Pompeo and now Bolton will help advance Haley’s cause, Carafano added.

What Bolton means for Trump’s broader strategy

Bolton’s appointment makes U.S. foreign policy “America First on steroids,” Kupchan said. “This very hard-line, strident figure will stoke President Donald Trump’s hardest-line instincts.”

“With Bolton’s appointment, you’ve got the most conservative ideological and hawkish foreign policy advisers in recent memory at (a) time when toughness is required, but so is pragmatism and flexibility,” Aaron David Miller, vice president for new initiatives at the Wilson Center, told Bloomberg News.

This also means that “we are entering a phase where [Trump] is becoming more confident about his foreign policy views. It’s clear he is proud of what he views as a victory of securing a meeting with the North Koreans. He thinks that is because of his own aggressive posture,” Julianne Smith, former national security adviser to former Vice President Joe Biden and now with the Center for a New America, told The Guardian.

“He knows the government well, but smoothing over differences was never John Bolton’s forte,” Miller said.

“A national security adviser must be an honest broker, ensuring [the president] considers all points of view,” tweeted Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. “The obvious question is whether John Bolton has the temperament and the judgment for the job.”

At the end of the day, “the president is the decider-in-chief,” and Bolton’s presence will not change that, Carafano said. The Trump administration already has made major foreign policy decisions, including how to handle the Islamic State, defense strategy, North Korea, China and Russia.

“Bringing Bolton in is more about adjusting how the administration follows through, rather than changing policies,” Carafano said. Trump wants to expedite the policies’ implementation and he sees Bolton as someone who can do that. The dynamics might be different than they were under McMaster, but the policies will be the same, he said.